1

THE IMPACT OF MYTH ON SCIENCE AND CULTURE

The magic inherent in myth stems from its allegorical nature, one that allows room for us to discern personal truth. As participants and observers, scientific or otherwise, we have to use our perception in conjunction with our experience to discover something new. The manner in which we perceive the world and our role in it influences what that new truth might look like to us. It also influences the degree of freedom we feel to choose one version over another and create a new experience for ourselves.

The journey of self-discovery and cultivating personal truth profoundly affects our ability to heal and to feel connected to the whole of life. It is, in many ways, a process through which we develop our own personal myth, feeling free enough to edit a previous interpretation. Because most myths are not literal does not mean they lack valuable truth. They can still be related to the participant's observation and experience. When our experience changes, so does our perception—and vice versa. Since all of us are evolving at different stages based upon our unique experience, the malleable nature of myths allows variations on personal truth to be accessed simultaneously by more than one observer. But does that mean they are not scientific?

One definition describes the term science as a “systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.”1 The word empirical is often connected with scientific experiment, and it is defined as (1) “derived from or guided by experience or experiment,” (2) “depending upon experience or observation alone, without using scientific method or theory, especially as in medicine,” and (3) “provable or verifiable by experience or experiment.”2 By these definitions, it would seem that experience alone is sufficient evidence for the conclusions one may draw. Where we run into controversy is when one's experience clashes with another's and either or both try to assert their “reality” onto the other.

In the context of astronomy, we see evidence of personal experience and perception combining with science. When it comes to naming planets, astronomers have systematically observed our physical universe and drawn parallels between planetary characteristics and cultural myths. This connection is something we seem to take for granted, and yet it is meaningful to the cultural evolutionary process. Observations naturally rely on personal perception, sometimes leading to “aha” moments and ideas that challenge the prevailing zeitgeist. While mainstream science adheres to a paradigm of reductionism, quantum science points to an ever-expanding universe that mirrors and responds to human consciousness.

THE MYTH AND SCIENCE CONNECTION

Cultural historian William Irwin Thompson, who has taught at Cornell University, MIT, and York University in Toronto, addresses the connection between myth and science in Imaginary Landscape.3 In the book, he elaborates on the Gaia theory originated by Drs. James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis in which the self-regulating capacity of our planet has to do with relationships and connections among living organisms from bacteria to the surrounding atmosphere. When something in the environment becomes extreme, Earth's self-regulating mechanism adjusts the ecosystem so that balance is maintained.

Thompson illustrates the conundrum the theory presents to orthodox scientists who maintain prejudice against it perhaps because of its popularity among the New Age community. Having such an appeal to New Agers may mean, from the reductionist viewpoint, that it holds no scientific merit. While the orthodox scientific community attempts to invalidate the authors, Thompson reminds us that they are by no means “unscientific.”

Lovelock is an atmospheric chemist who holds a B.S. in chemistry from the University of Manchester and a Ph.D. in medicine from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Margulis earned an M.S. in zoology and genetics from the University of Wisconsin and a Ph.D. in genetics from the University of California, Berkeley. She taught biology at Boston University and was named “distinguished university professor” in the department of botany at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. She later changed her university affiliation from botany to biology and then to geoscience.4

Clearly, the academic backgrounds of both Lovelock and Margulis indicate sufficient scientific knowledge. The fact that they expanded their knowledge beyond the constraints of orthodoxy should not invalidate their research. Enhancing intellectual knowledge with organic intuition may in fact lead us to surprising insights that empower rather than overpower, and create more sustainability for the planet. There is a necessity for allowing the self-regulating mechanism to take place in the human psyche, as it does on this planet, so that neither orthodoxy nor intuition becomes extreme.

Gaia, the name of a Greek goddess, is an example of how scientists often choose names from Greek mythology to represent their new discoveries. Gaia is Mother Earth from whose womb all life began. As Mother Nature personified, she symbolizes the ecosystem that is Earth and is constantly working to maintain balance and harmony within the environment and among all living organisms. The way of Gaia is the feminine way of healing. Rather than exist in an active state of doing, her way requires us to engender a state of nurturance where we are able to trust the way of nature and simply be.

Living in accordance with natural laws not only supports life on Earth, it sustains human health as well. What we often fail to remember is that cosmic law informs natural law and the reciprocity between them informs healing. When we upset the ecosystem and pollute the Earth, we pollute our own bodies in the process. By contrast, when we recognize our connection to the cosmos and endeavor to heal our bodies as part of that “whole,” we also contribute to planetary healing.

MOTHER NATURE CURE

The Gaia archetype is the foundation for all methods of the “nature cure.” Global consciousness perceives purpose in all living things, from the most primordial bacteria, to human beings and beyond, to the greater cosmos. All have significant interaction with their environment that either perpetuates balance and harmony or contributes to disease. When we live in accordance with Gaia's laws, health and healing result. When we disregard the laws of harmony, we witness disconnection, disease, and suffering. “In this sense, all medicine and healing can be seen as a system of ecology.”5

Cosmic principles provide a framework for both unity and uniqueness. In plants, animals, and humans, cosmic elements combine to create a specific harmonic “signature” providing clues to the process of healing—a process that constitutes returning to the whole, to unity. It is precisely through the process of discovering our own unique signature that we can celebrate our contribution to, and connection with, the whole. In myths, we witness a similar framework—an archetype within which truths apply to individuals personally and to societies culturally.

So, on the one hand, astronomy involves a rational procedure that leads to the discovery and classification of planets, while on the other, the act of naming involves the process of perception and personal observation that potentially holds infinite possibilities. In the same way, we could examine any myth and discover something new within it according to our current experience. Similarly, there is a synchrony occurring around planet Sedna's discovery that applies to current cultural and environmental changes.

As we will see in the Sedna legend described in chapter 2, there is an inextricable link between myth and science. With myth, we are dealing with unseen “irrational” influences involving symbols, intuition, emotion, and perception. With science, we are dealing with “rational” intellect and deductive reasoning. As we examine certain aspects of planetary science (astronomy) and planetary signatures (astrology) we can find evidence of both types of influence.

Astronomical science explains how gravity and the electromagnetic force fields of planets interact with other planets in the solar system, including Earth. Astrological science considers the personal and cultural impacts of planetary discoveries on human evolution and individual health. By including both of these perspectives we are given a more complete picture regarding how we may create greater harmony for individuals and the global community.

The scientific community continues to debate whether certain planetary bodies—including Sedna—are planets or dwarf planets. For readers with a more rational framework, the discussion of classification will be relevant. For readers with a more intuitive framework the discussion of myth and archetype will hold greater interest. Regardless of where one falls between the two, it is important to realize that size really doesn't matter. What does matter is energetic force.

THE PLUTO DEBATE

Even with the recent “demotion” of Pluto to a dwarf planet, which is now in debate again by the International Astronomical Union (IAU), its classification bears no consequence on the astrological influences regarding human evolution. For about a decade before Pluto's discovery, Percival Lowell observed perturbations in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune, theorizing that there had to be another planet “out there” exerting its force on them. Although his calculations were unsuccessful in leading him to discover Pluto for himself, his theories led Clyde Tombaugh to discover it on February 18, 1930 at the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona. The point of all this is that Pluto's effects were observed before the planet itself was actually discovered, seen, studied, or classified. This is often the case in astronomical science.

Atomic Force

An interesting synchronicity is that atomic force research also began in the years prior to Pluto's actual discovery, and following its discovery nuclear weapons were developed and used. Einstein had discovered the tremendous energy hidden in matter with the famous equation E = mc2, or the energy of matter is equivalent to the mass multiplied by the square of the speed of light—a truly astronomical number. Regarding the debate over size, all one has to consider are the violent effects generated from one atomic bomb, where vast amounts of energy are released from microscopic particles of matter. By comparison, the huge planetary mass needed to generate the force of gravity represents a “weak force,” which puzzled Einstein.

Through fission we observe that splitting two atoms from heavier masses creates a weaker energy than fusing together two lighter masses, which creates a stronger, binding energy.6 The process of fusion generates more force, but that force is unpredictable and much more challenging to control.

It would seem, then, that the size of a material substance is not all that relevant to its ability to exert forceful effects on other objects. On the other hand, the name of a substance or object may be significantly powerful with regard to conscious perception, aggregate agreement, and subsequent effects on the environment and human destiny.

WHAT'S IN A NAME?

Whether one reduces the naming process to coincidence or not, it has historically demonstrated tremendous impact on human culture. Pluto received its name from Venetia Burney, an eleven-year-old English schoolgirl who was interested in ancient mythology. She felt that Hades, god of the underworld, was the most appropriate name for a planet that, at the time, was the farthest known planet from the Sun. Although other names had been suggested and submitted, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory were asked to vote and decided upon the name “Pluto.”7 In the decades following Pluto's discovery, astrologers came to observe a consistent correlation between the planet's impact on cultural change, historical events, and its association with Hades and also with Dionysus, with whom the Greeks associated both Hades and Pluto.8

As god of the underworld, Pluto rules alchemy, death and rebirth, the shadow realm, occult knowledge (that which is hidden from view), sexuality, and all things generally considered dark and taboo. Its archetypal lesson concerns the ethical use of power, primordial instincts, and libidinal forces. (This power, defined by the ancients as “serpent power” is termed “Kundalini energy” in Hinduism.) It is often by exposing negative tendencies from the shadow realm that Pluto initially expresses itself. During the time Pluto made its appearance in our solar system, it revealed its archetype in Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Hirohito, Perón, and weapons of mass destruction.

On the day Pluto was discovered, February 18, 1930 (see fig. 1.1), the Sun occupied the sign of Aquarius at 29° 35' while Pluto itself occupied Cancer at 17° 46'. Pluto will conjoin its own natal Sun on April 18, 2042. What is interesting about this is that Aquarius is associated with scientific breakthrough, inventions, innovation, and all things futuristic and “sci-fi.” This is certainly how atomic force would have been perceived in 1930. The extreme shadow of Aquarius can also be quite cold, detached, and devoid of human compassion.

image

Figure 1.1. Pluto discovery chart.

Tragically, the destructive agent of Pluto's energy, as expressed through the “shadow” Sun in Aquarius, influenced fanatical expression and abuse of power in factions such as the Nazi regime, resulting in the Holocaust and the development of weapons of mass destruction. As we continue to evolve culturally we are given the opportunity to harness Pluto's alchemical process in our individual lives. If we succeed we may well discover that by 2042 we have transformed the “lead” of oppressive power abuse, perpetrated by a few, into the “gold” of human goodness and individual empowerment for all; a far more positive expression of an Aquarian sun and Pluto's shadow resolution.

It is relevant to mention that Pluto's current transit through the sign of Capricorn occupies a degree that directly opposes its own natal position (see fig. 1.2 below). Like a full moon, this aspect shines light upon our past (Cancer) and upon what needs to change in our current societal structures (Capricorn). With these two signs, one could also say that the opportunity exists to transform the relationship between one's private self (Cancer) and public presence (Capricorn).

It takes Pluto 248 years to complete one circuit through the zodiac from Earth's perspective, so it transits one sign for approximately 12–35 years. Pluto entered Capricorn in 2008 (when the world's economy went into recession) and will continue transiting that sign until 2023. Capricorn represents systems and structures—politics, banking, education, religion, and medicine. Since it is ruled by the planet Saturn, it is also associated with cultivating mastery within oneself. When Saturn or Capricorn influence is present, we feel limited in our capacity to be our own authority. Duties and responsibilities heaped upon us by some external authority make us feel overwhelmed. Through experience gained over time, which is ruled by Saturn, or Chronos in Greek, we eventually gain wisdom and mastery, learning to become the “CEO” of our own destiny.

With Pluto's journey through Capricorn, we have seen the dismantling and degradation of our structures. We have also seen those in positions of authority—whether CEOs, religious leaders, or politicians—be exposed for their exploitive abuse of those they manipulated.

Right now, as Pluto approaches the last decant of Capricorn, we may see some rebuilding of systems taking place. Concurrently, as of December 20, 2017, Saturn moved back into Capricorn, its natural sign, which signified recapitulation of its journey through the zodiac. In its “home” sign, it demands integrity from those in leadership roles, fortifying Pluto's role to expose those who have been operating without integrity.

Whether it is due to Pluto's “Sun in Aquarius,” or because Pluto's effects were felt metaphysically before it was actually “discovered,” we are experiencing Aquarian-related phenomena. This is all to prepare us for Pluto's eventual move into the sign of Aquarius in 2023, the conjunction with its own Sun in 2042, as well as Earth's transition into the Age of Aquarius in 2160. At present, our culture is dealing with instances of cyber attacks, manipulation of information, and other power abuses within the realm of technology. We are also witnessing enraged individuals violently projecting their shadow onto society. These are already increasing and may become more intense as Pluto makes its transition from Capricorn to Aquarius.

image

Figure 1.2. Pluto transit in Capricorn.

It's important to remember, however, that Pluto governs the death and rebirth processes. What Pluto annihilates is that to which the ego is exceedingly attached and with which it overidentifies. The rebuilding phase of Pluto in Capricorn is about individuals cultivating an inner authority that empowers people, rather than relying on a system or leader to be the source of power for, or over, them.

With Pluto opposing its own natal position there is an intense tug-of-war going on in American culture. One side reminisces about a particular era, wanting to return to a time when things felt more safe and secure. The other side advocates the dismantling of systems that have grown out of touch with current culture. As is the case with all oppositions, a lasting resolution lies somewhere in between.

SPOOKY ACTION AT A DISTANCE

Pluto's natal Sun in Aquarius holds relevance to advances in science that began in 1930. According to a new analysis cited in an MIT Technology Review article titled “Einstein's ‘Spooky Action at a Distance' Paradox Older than Thought,”9 Albert Einstein was actually investigating quantum theory around this time, a full five years earlier than originally believed by the scientific community.

An example of this research is the EPR paradox—named after its three inventors Einstein, Podolsky (Boris), and Rosen (Nathan)—which found that when any two particles are created at the same point and time in space, they are deeply linked by their origin, so much so that the law of reciprocity applies to each particle simultaneously.

The effects that travel across astronomical distances are what Einstein called “spooky action at a distance.” As quantum science suggests, consciousness, or awareness, affects what is being observed, whether it's the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, the photoelectric effect, or quantum entanglement, the scientific term referring to the principle of reciprocity. No matter how much distance later separates the two particles, each will feel what happens to the other.

This theory is subject to ongoing scientific scrutiny. Yet, consider this: if during the “big bang” all things came into being, originating from the same point and time in space, every experience and subsequent response undertaken by each life form has a reciprocal effect on everything else!

Patterns are found consistently in nature and manifest in the four elements (earth, air, fire, water)—at all levels—from the inner space of human anatomy to outer space, emphasizing the law of reciprocity in healing, and the role vibration and sound play in the delivery of such reciprocity. Quantum science also points to the very real possibility that everything is entangled—connected through one unified field. In his book The Intelligence of the Cosmos, philosopher and systems scientist Ervin Laszlo, nominated twice for the Nobel Peace Prize, underscores the notion that an omnipotent force, or implicate order, is what links all things from micro to macro levels, in a simultaneously complex and coherent manner. “Particles and atoms, molecules and cells, as well as planets and solar systems are integrated clusters: complex coherent systems, the products of natural processes structuring the vibrations that emerged in the wake of the Big Bang.”10 Laszlo describes space as a vibrational force field of consciousness that “in-forms” all things material.

Undoubtedly, the unified field debate will continue for years to come. Laszlo encourages “a truly rational exploration of possibilities, while at the same time reminding us that rationality has its limits.”11 To that end, Brian Greene, author and professor of physics and mathematics at Columbia, agrees: “. . . that's both the wonder and the angst of a life in science. Exploring the unknown requires tolerating uncertainty.”12

While the Sun occupied the sign of Aquarius when Pluto was discovered, Sedna's Sun occupied the sign Scorpio, which is ruled by Pluto. As we explore the astrological significance of Sedna's discovery chart in chapter 4, we will see how these two planets, Pluto and Sedna, share similarities, including connections to the signs of Aquarius and Scorpio. Given that the planetary rulers of these signs, Uranus and Pluto, respectively, formed a square (90° angle) to each other during 2011–2016, their energies are reinforcing our collective evolution as we move into the Age of Aquarius. Aquarius belongs to the air element, representing the intellect. It is symbolically known as the “water bearer,” the constellation of a man pouring water from a pitcher. How interesting, then, that we have Aquarius (mind) connected to Scorpio (emotion) through the Sun positions of Pluto and Sedna.

Perhaps it is time to recognize the link between intellectual development and emotional health, as well as how they express themselves through the elements of air and water. We will explore evidence of the electromagnetic currents important to neurological processes as well as water's impact on brain function.

IT'S ALL IN YOUR HEAD

In the “The Nature of the Chemical Bond,” two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling said the following:

We may ask what the next step in the search for an understanding of the nature of life will be. I think that it will be the elucidation of the nature of the electromagnetic phenomena involved in mental activity . . . I believe that thinking, both conscious and unconscious, and short-term memory involves electromagnetic phenomena in the brain, interacting with the molecular (material) patterns of long-term memory, obtained from inheritance or experience.13

While Pauling was awarded his first Nobel Prize in 1954, professor Rustum Roy published a paper on the “sol-gel” technique, which has since been cited over 68,000 times and earned him leadership status in the field of material science.14 Despite his five professorships at three universities (Penn State, Arizona State, and the University of Arizona), fifty years championing interdisciplinary studies in materials research science, and twenty-one Nobel Prize nominations, the scientific community never honored Roy's work. Most likely this is due to the fact that he had devoted his life to proving the efficacy of human intention and prayer upon material substances, most notably that of water.

In his presentation “Water, Water, Everywhere; and So Little Understood,”15 Roy explained that it is the structure, not the composition of water that responds to change. He emphasized that the first law of materials science was that “structure determines properties,” and he continued to explain that the structure of liquid water is subject to anisodesmicity, a term that means “highly unequal molecular bonds”; these bonds make water highly unique compared to other substances.

Whereas reductionist scientists believe that composition determines structure, making all liquid water identical, Roy pointed out that structure determines composition. As a result, there are undoubtedly infinite types of liquid water, because many things can change structure, including electromagnetic fields and something called “epitaxy.” Epitaxy, he explained, is a term referring to the transfer of information without involving any substance; hence the argument for human intention being one way to change water's structure, along with, he added, sound, vibration, and subtle energies.

UNDERSTANDING WATER

Unlike other liquids, water has a “sticky” quality. When water molecules bind to each other, the process is called “cohesion”; when water molecules adhere to other substances it's called “adhesion.” This is why water droplets appear to be suspended before they finally fall such as the one shown in figure 1.3. But chemistry and electricity are also at work on the molecular level, specifically, the positive and negative charges of hydrogen and oxygen atoms, which give water its cohesive quality. And water's unique chemistry ensures that freezing takes place from the top down rather than from the bottom up so that life within it can be preserved.

image

Figure 1.3. Water's cohesive quality. (Photo by William Warby.)

A healthy water molecule will have all of its electrons. If water is unhealthy it loses an electron, thereby creating space for unhealthy microbes to gather. “Thus,” says Ralph Suddath in his article “Vibration, Energy, and Water,” “water has an ability to store and share information, both healthy and unhealthy . . . [and] even when water has been purified, it can still contain electromagnetic frequencies from poisonous substances.”16

Unfortunately, most people “purify” water by pouring more chemicals into it in an effort to diminish algae, bacteria, and other harmful microbes, no doubt owing to the reductionist view that “composition rules structure” instead of the other way around. In doing so, they serve only to exacerbate water pollution. But, in a statement that lends support to Rustum Roy's theory, Suddath, who served eleven years as chief engineer at the Tesla Energy Institute, says the following:

There is a way to solve the problem of our water becoming polluted and de-energized and it is actually quite easy. . . . By raising the vibrational frequency of water, unhealthy bacteria are no longer drawn to it. . . . What is needed is a paradigm shift in how we perceive and care for this precious resource, which is the foundation of all of our lives. It would be ideal if water's vibration could be raised naturally as it is in nature where life-supporting frequencies can be placed into the water.17

This statement also supports the late author, researcher, and philosopher Dr. Masaru Emoto's water crystal theory. Emoto's books Messages from Water and the Universe and The Hidden Messages in Water provide compelling evidence that words, personal perception, thinking, and feeling impact the shape and health of water crystals (see figs. 1.4 and 1.5).

Scientists at the European Union physics lab in France were able to prove that water transfers memory via covalent bonding, the joining together of two atoms to form molecules.18 Taking into consideration these findings as well as the fact that the brain itself is at least 75 percent water, it is easy to see the impact water, and any alteration to water molecules, would have on the brain, hence the reciprocity between cognitive health and water.

image

Figure 1.4. Dr. Emoto's water crystal image with positive energy. (Copyright Office Masaru Emoto, LLC. Used with permission.)

image

Figure 1.5. Dr. Emoto's water crystal image with negative energy. (Copyright Office Masaru Emoto, LLC. Used with permission.)

As we continue our discussion on myth and science, particularly, the myth of Sedna and its connection to water, we can begin to see how one's subjective viewpoint, or perception, greatly impacts one's intentions. Electromagnetic activity, however, is something very much affected by the movement of the planets and the reason why planetary influences upon human perception become so significant. Remember, no matter how much distance separates two particles, each will feel what happens to the other. Sedna's return is an opportunity to reflect upon how the law of reciprocity is operating at all times among all living beings, including planets within and beyond our solar system. More importantly, Sedna's return reminds us that we as individuals and as a species are impacting water, and, in turn, water impacts our health. For now, it's important to further explore subjectivity and consciousness as they have bearing on the nature of water from which the Sedna myth is derived and on which the Inuit depend for survival.

Subjectivity is defined as “pertaining to or characteristic of an individual; placing excessive emphasis on one's own moods, attitudes, opinions, etc.”19Consciousness is defined as “the thoughts and feelings, collectively, of an individual or of an aggregate of people; internal knowledge; concern, interest; full activity of the mind and senses.”20 A further look into Inuit culture shows how important the role of consciousness becomes, as it dwells within all elements in the environment, not just in humans. This is a concept that the Austrian scholar and lecturer Rudolf Steiner called “anthroposophy.” Steiner also lectured about the higher realms and dimensions, which he called the “Devachans” and how to access them through subjective practices.

SUBJECTIVITY AND ACCESS TO THE DEVACHAN

In the numerous lectures for which he became renowned, Rudolph Steiner addressed the idea of subjectivity as the means by which creation becomes manifest. His lectures connected the Egyptian, Pythagorean, and Hindu initiatory practices to those of the Atlantean and Lemurian Mystery Schools.

Thus the pupils of the Atlantean mysteries saw everything in the world as the product of the human form. . . . These impressions were retained in memory through the time of the flood. . . . The ancient Indian initiators . . . called up in the souls of their pupils this picture of primeval human beings. . . . When the Indian pupil had this picture inwardly, it was felt that everything had sprung from it, that what appeared in this picture as blood had become the waters of the earth and so on. . . . It was said, “In this picture you have two things before your eyes. First, the picture itself; but then, also, what lights up in you as your innermost essence when you contemplate this picture. Without is the macrocosm; within you is what you feel as a sort of extract, the microcosm.”21

From his studies regarding Earth's evolution, Steiner concluded that the Egypto-Chaldean (Indian) culture mirrored that of the Atlantean-Lemurian era. This era holds significance due to its association with the time Sedna would have last entered our solar system, around 11,000 years ago. He described the initiatory process, before and after the events of Christ, as a process by which the adept is gradually acclimated to the Devachan, the higher dimensional realm, the world of spirit. Akasha is another term many disciplines use to describe the spiritual realm of higher consciousness, while Brahman is a Hindu term for achieving the sublime spiritual state from within.

Hence initiation was a great moment in the spiritual life of the pupil who could then allow to arise within what was grasped as Brahman. This was a mighty event in the human soul. It was a rising into higher worlds. In no other way could a human being be initiated and achieve real vision, than by rising into higher worlds.

The world around us is the physical world. Within and around it surges the astral world. Higher stands Devachan, the world of the gods. The pupil must penetrate to the highest regions of Devachan if Brahman, the primeval self, is to be felt in the macrocosm. Then the pupil is in highest Devachan . . . whence springs the noblest that is in the human being. It was a realm of the highest and most perfect order into which the pupil was transported.22

Steiner held that subjectivity and personal creativity must be cultivated in order to reach the Devachan. He also acknowledged that today's astronomers are only able to perceive a shadow of what can be learned from the cosmos because we have lost our ability to sense anything beyond the physical realm.

When astronomy today speaks of the cosmos and its contents, it can report only what the sense-perceiving, physical eye sees when it looks into the heavens. This was by no means the case for ancient clairvoyant humanity in Atlantean times. Human beings did not see physical, finite, shining stars then. What we see today with the physical eye is merely an outward expression of the spiritual reality that human beings beheld in former times.23

This essentially describes the crisis of cognition we are facing today in which our culture adheres to the recognized “authorities” steeped in Newtonian reductionism—perceiving only through the physical realm and invalidating what comes from spiritual sight.

“SUBJECTIVE” OBJECTIVITY

In The Intelligence of the Cosmos, Laszlo and the contributing authors reinforce Steiner's notion that scientific “objectivity” is still bound by the scientist's “subjective” perspective. Gary Jacobs, one of the contributing authors, writes the following:

Resolution of the conflict between these two contradictory views of reality is rooted in the fact that all objective knowledge is the result of subjective processes of cognition. Science studies the objective field of external reality. Spirituality studies the subjective field of psychological self-experience. But all knowledge, even scientific knowledge of external material phenomena involves a subjective process of perception, mental interpretation, social and psychological construction of reality.24

Jacobs explains that, while it began as the study of material objects, the goal of “objectivity” was to eliminate personal bias. Unfortunately, in this endeavor, being “objective” became synonymous with only acknowledging as “real” those things pertaining to the external world. All else, including subjective experience, especially spiritual or intuitive perception, became the antithesis of “reality.”25

LINEAR AND SYMBOLIC PROCESSES

To better understand cognition, as well as water's effect on the brain, it is helpful to examine two types of cognitive processing: linear and symbolic. A linear interpretation involves seeing through the physical senses while a symbolic perspective involves engaging the nonphysical senses. Since the brain deals with both linear and symbolic processes, it seems reasonable to assume that, in order to better understand brain function, one would require a methodology that acknowledges the complexity of both.

Tsutomu Nakada, M.D., Ph.D., director and professor of the Center for Integrated Human Brain Science at the University of Niigata in Japan, describes self-organization in this way: “Everything which appears spontaneously in the universe comes to be so through self-organization, a representative characteristic of complex system behavior.”26 This supports both Steiner's description of subjective creative power and Laszlo's “complex and coherent” clusters of vibration in consciousness and space.

It is this complex system of processing information that is relevant to emotional impact, cognitive processing, and personal perception on human science. Nakada writes: “The final goal of human science is to know the self.”27 Ironically, spiritual edicts also exist that encourage one to “know thyself.” Chapter 5 explores the connection between water and consciousness on the collective level. For now, it's important to establish the impact water has on cognitive function.

When explaining the relationship between water and brain function, Nakada says, “A major goal of our research is to explore the relationship between cerebral water trafficking and brain function. Despite the importance of water to all organisms, there is little understanding of how it specifically affects the brain. Recent studies have suggested that water trafficking . . . plays an important role in neuronal activation and sensitivity.”28

For this reason alone it is important to understand the interconnectedness of brain function and water. If both of these functions have an interdependent connection to (and by) electromagnetic currents, then there is good reason to understand planetary influences—especially through air and water elements—upon the earth and human anatomy. Moreover, the intricate reciprocity between water and cognitive health should certainly motivate us to care more about Earth's waters and our own relationship to water.

Given this information, we owe it to ourselves to study the impact personal perception, words, thoughts, and emotions have on our environment, specifically that of water. More to the point, our relationship with water, as perceived through the elements in astrology and nature, represents human emotion and the feminine principle. We have to ask ourselves how important it is to our future well-being to restore to reverence that which we have historically denigrated.

When we consider that Pluto was discovered while in the sign of Cancer, a water sign that represents emotions, intuition, mother, and memory, and is now transiting its opposite sign Capricorn, which represents authority, structure, father, and time, we can see how the current dynamic of Pluto is calling for balance. What was first expressed as power abuse toward yin-based expression (Pluto in Cancer) must transition to equal empowerment within our social structure (Pluto in Capricorn). As water and earth signs, Cancer and Capricorn are also yin, and with Pluto's influence, there is a rebirth of yin qualities taking place and coming to fullness with the opposition.

So much more than a plea by “feminists” to have a seat at the proverbial table of life, this is about restoring balance between yin (earth/water) and yang (fire/air) elemental expressions for the sake of global sustainability. Knowing how ancient records have been controlled by those who have maintained the reins of power enables us to understand what is asking for transformation at this time.

REMAKING MYTH AND “MARY”

For the past few thousand years, our world has been dominated by a form of Judeo-Christian doctrine that, while it may have served many insofar as reaching a higher state of consciousness, was founded upon intentions that were not so pure at the time. The word mythos once referred to actual records of ancient people rather than “tales veering far from any truthfulness,” which was the modern definition for the word as it was redefined by the Catholic Church.29 In her bestselling book The Chalice and the Blade culminating fifteen years of research, author Riane Eisler describes how sacred stories from (and about) our past have been rewritten for the sake of “normalizing” domination.

Many of these men believed that what they did was also the will of their gods and felt divinely inspired. But whether it was done in the name of gods, bishops, or kings, out of faith, ambition, or fear, this work of constantly fashioning and refashioning normative oral and written literature did not simply follow social change. It was an integral part of the process of norm changing: the process whereby a male-dominated, violent, and hierarchical society gradually began to be seen as not only normal but also right.30

Eisler points out that the remaking of sacred stories from Mesopotamia, Canaan, Judaea, and Israel, as well as the revising of certain codes of law, was performed mainly by priests.

The final reduction of the myths and laws that have so profoundly affected our Western minds into one sacred book—the first half of our Bible—took place about a hundred years after Aeschylus wrote the Oresteia in Greece. At this time in Palestine the biblical mythology on which Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are still based was again sifted, edited, and added to by a group of Hebrew priests identified by biblical scholars as P or the Priestly school. This label was to distinguish them from earlier re-mythers, such as E or the Elohim school, who wrote in the northern kingdom of Israel, and J or the Jahweh school of the southern Kingdom of Judaea. These E and J editorial teams had earlier reworked Babylonian and Canaanite myths, as well as Hebraic history, to suit their purposes. Now the P team came in to work over these heterogeneous ancient texts and try to produce a new holy package. Their aim, to quote biblical scholars who annotated the famous Dartmouth Bible, was “to translate into reality the blueprint for a theocratic state.”31

So as the Dartmouth Bible annotators write, the priests (P school) merged the E (Elohim) and J (Jahweh) school material and passed it off as the new “P strand.” Their influence is thought to include nearly half of the Pentateuch, several chapters in Genesis, Exodus, Numbers, and the entire book of Leviticus, with the end result being a patchwork representation of original texts now known as the Old Testament.

Eisler describes this patching process as the reason for so many inconsistencies in content that reflect the conflict between what had been the lingering reality and the new ways put forth by the priestly ruling class. The lingering culture honored women alongside men and believed sexuality to be a sacred art and initiatory practice. The new culture, dominated by the ruling male priests, held that women could only experience sexuality under the man's authority within the confines of marriage. This process began in Egypt and Sumer, spreading throughout the entire Fertile Crescent until at least 400 BCE—the time experts believe the last version of the Old Testament was (re)written by Hebrew priests.

One of the most significant examples of this transference of power, Eisler says, is the gradual vilification of the serpent symbol from Moses's use of the bronze healing staff on Mount Sinai, to the devil tempting Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. Long before Moses, the serpent had been revered as a symbol of alchemy, wisdom, healing, and the eternal spiraling of the heavens, likened to the Divine Feminine Essence, the Eternal Mother and Milky Way Goddess, giving birth to all things on Earth.

Through the principle of “yang” domination and a “might makes right” philosophy, the way of feminine/yin intuition and essence has been utterly forsaken. Eisler points out how Christ himself honored women, keeping company with them, contradicting certain interpretations of scriptures encouraging women's subordination to men. For instance, Mary Magdalene is described as a prostitute in the New Testament. In fact, she had been a high priestess within the Egyptian Order, the first to whom Jesus appeared upon resurrecting, and a leader within the early Christian movement after his death.32

Eisler cites examples such as in Acts 9:36 (KJV) where there is mention of a woman disciple Jesus called Tabitha, conspicuously omitted from the original twelve. In another example from Romans 16:7 (KJV), “we find Paul respectfully greeting a woman apostle named Junia, whom he describes as senior to himself in the movement. ‘Greet Mary, who bestowed labor on us . . . Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kin and fellow prisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me [emphasis added].'”33 Other inconsistencies stem from the deliberate omission of sacred texts from the Bible, most important of which are the fifty-two Gnostic gospels, discovered in a nearby province of Upper Egypt, known as Nag Hammadi.34

Eisler writes that Harvard professor Helmut Koester believed the texts preceded the New Testament gospels, “possibly as early as the second half of the first half century (50–100)—as early as, or earlier than, Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John.”35

Because the transition of cultural perception had begun prior to the events of Christ (mentioned above as having started in Egypt, Sumer, and the Fertile Crescent), these texts include much of the newly adopted perspective regarding women as put forth by the priests. However, what deemed them “heretical” had to do with the fact that gnosis means “divine knowledge” and involved teachings that threatened the status of the contemporary Hebrew order.

Specifically, what we find in these Gnostic gospels is the same idea that caused the Hebrew priesthood to revile and seek to do away with Jesus . . . that access to the deity need not go through a religious hierarchy headed by a chief rabbi, high bishop, or pope. It is, rather, available directly through gnosis, or divine knowledge—without having to pay homage or tithes to an authoritarian priesthood.36

Whether authoritarian priesthood, orthodox scientists, or false representations of history, the message is clear: it is time to restore faith in our own experience as the means to discovering truth. By examining Sedna's symbolic meaning, we are being invited into the process of revising all that had formerly been accepted without question. We are also being asked to renew and heal ourselves through the process of evaluating our own personal myth.