THE CELEBRITY OF an actor, hired to recite other people’s words, is a source of agonised embarrassment to Alan Rickman. Not only does he long to direct more, but he is acutely aware that the writers don’t get the credit that the performers do. Actors should be the servants of the writers, as he once put it, but they get promoted over the heads of the playwrights instead. As Peter Barnes wryly remarks, ‘A lot of people haven’t grasped that actors are not making up the words as they go along.’
Stephen Davis once told me how Alan had stood up at an awards ceremony while dishing out the acting prizes and said, ‘Can we please spare some thought for the writers?’ Davis added: ‘It is extraordinary that we are such a visualising culture that we are now living in the cult of the actor. In Hollywood, they are the ultimate royalty; and Alan is embarrassed at the amount of publicity given to actors. I think he is very conscious that he is an actor who profits greatly by success and fame and charisma but who is very careful that he doesn’t use people as a grandstand for his career, because he’s a man of very high principles. But it does cut both ways: you create a tremendous amount of mystique by being Garboesque. It’s a win-win situation to be in.’
Alan Rickman routinely rejects so many roles that Ruby Wax says she feels sick every morning at the thought of the amount of money her purist friend is turning down every single day. Dusty Hughes’ story of the ceiling-high piles of script in Rickman’s flat suggests a crazy paper factory. No wonder Alan has to be fanatically tidy. He is famously faddy and principled, but that doesn’t stop him being offered first choice on countless projects. Perhaps that hard-to-get quality simply whets producers’ appetites: they know he’s not to be bought for any price. Indeed, you could dine out for years on revelations about the major roles that Alan Rickman has declined. Nevertheless, he is contrary enough to moan about the parts he doesn’t get.
When he reached 50, Alan Rickman found himself at a crossroads whose three-fingered signpost behaved like a demented weathervane according to mood. One direction pointed to continuing film stardom, another to heavyweight theatrical roles and the last to directing.
He risked typecasting in the first, he was often too busy to pursue the second and he was a relative newcomer so far as the third option is concerned. No wonder he was frustrated. He had never been more in demand for major movies; yet Alan Rickman faced a quiet mid-career crisis.
Before the Rivergate controversy drove a wedge between Rickman and his old colleague Jules Wright in 1993, he complained to her one day that nobody asked him to go on stage anymore. ‘The problem is that people become inhibited about asking him and assume that he’s not available. Maybe Alan is lost to the theatre now, like Gary Oldman,’ said Jules to me in 1995.
This exasperates all those who would like to see more of Rickman in what they say is his natural habitat on stage: ‘He is the most complete man of the theatre I know,’ insists his old RADA contemporary Stephen Crossley.
‘I ask Alan Rickman every year to rejoin the RSC; I ask him to name his parts,’ Adrian Noble told me in 1995. ‘But it’s difficult when you enter the film game to find the time; with film, it’s not only the actual filming that takes time, but the hanging around beforehand while they find the money.
‘Once you move into film seriously, it’s very hard to carve out the time to do more theatre. It’s much more risky – you stand to lose more.’
Peter Barnes agrees. ‘It’s difficult to return after you leave the theatre, because theatre is hard. And you get more exposure in movies, so theatre becomes something you do only for yourself. I have always done movies to finance my theatre work. With theatre for actors, it’s very much a case of working for yourself.
‘He’s obsessed about not playing villains. I can understand why he doesn’t want to do them, but for a long career it’s pretty good to have a stand-by like that. You will never be too old to become a villain. He’s more a character star than a star star. And Gene Hackman doesn’t go out of fashion.
‘Alan turned down the Lytton Strachey role in Carrington before Jonathan Pryce was offered it. He’s since moaned to me about turning that down plus the role of the baddie Scar in Disney’s The Lion King, which then went to Jeremy Irons. He had second thoughts, but it was too late. He was too proud to admit it, when he should have done it.’
Indeed, it’s tempting to conclude that Alan had his regrets only after Pryce and Irons were seen to have made such tremendous successes of Strachey and Scar; a dog-in-the-manger attitude is only human, after all. After much humming and haaing, Sir Anthony Hopkins finally agreed to play Richard Nixon on film only after director Oliver Stone craftily asked him what he thought of Gary Oldman for the role. ‘I think Alan is much better than Tony Hopkins, who has never been the same since he gave up drinking,’ is Peter’s opinion. ‘One doesn’t wish for artists to self-destruct, but in giving up one must be brutal and say they lose something.’
‘I certainly discussed the role of Lytton Strachey with him,’ says Christopher Hampton, writer and director of Carrington. ‘When he came with me to the screening, I think Alan was upset that he hadn’t taken it. He said, “Oh my God, what have I done!”’
‘He was also offered the role of Peron opposite Madonna in the movie version of Evita, which then went to Jonathan Pryce,’ says Barnes. At this rate, Pryce – yet another friend of Rickman’s – will be learning to read Alan’s fingerprint profile on every script he’s sent.
‘Alan was also told that he was second on the list after Anthony Hopkins to play Hannibal Lecter in Silence Of The Lambs. If Hopkins had decided not to do it, then Alan was the next choice,’ explains Peter.
‘The funny thing is, Alan said that that one couldn’t be turned down, that it would make him the biggest and most powerful star in Hollywood. It would have been a stellar leap. I think Alan would have been extraordinary, though I can’t understand why it didn’t go to Brian Cox – who played Hannibal Lecter originally in the film Manhunter.’
Silence Of The Lambs did finally make Hopkins a British superstar in Hollywood. He won the Oscar for Best Actor and was also awarded a knighthood, though many felt that the Queen’s honours system should not have rewarded an actor for playing a serial killer who disposed of the bodies by eating them.
Still, it was a testament to the sheer size of the part, which Hopkins seized with tremendous relish. ‘But it was a one-note performance,’ said one film critic in exasperation. One can only sadly speculate on the insidious power of Alan Rickman in the role.
‘I think Alan is much better than Tony Hopkins, who has never been the same since he gave up drinking,’ is Peter’s opinion. ‘One doesn’t wish for artists to self-destruct, but in giving up one must be brutal and say they lose something.’
Some of the stories about the scripts on which Rickman has first refusal are almost farcical, though not particularly funny, of course, for the actors that unwittingly took his leavings. ‘In The Last Action Hero, the villain was played by Charles Dance. He agreed to it after seeing an early script. Then he happened to see a later script with the words “Alan Rickman” in brackets after the name of his character . . . !
‘Alan takes endless time to decide about which scripts to accept, goes through the whole Hamlet routine and cogitates for ever about whether to take a part,’ adds Barnes fondly. ‘He often rings up friends. He rang me up about playing Colonel Brandon in Emma Thompson’s film of Sense And Sensibility – he said to me, “The thing has got Hugh Grant in it.”
‘I think he was worried at the time about all the attention on Hugh Grant. Plus I have the impression they didn’t get on in An Awfully Big Adventure.’
The director Mike Newell was a modestly successful film-maker who unexpectedly hit the jackpot with the low-budget British movie Four Weddings And A Funeral. It became the biggest-grossing UK film of all time and turned Hugh Grant into an international star, charmingly knock-kneed and sweetly stammering. The overgrown-boy-next-door image was, of course, far too good to be true. An over-tired Hugh sullied his escutcheon when his idea of in-car entertainment at the seedier end of Sunset Boulevard excited the prurient attention of the Los Angeles Police Department. The rest is mugshot history.
Grant was signed up for Newell’s follow-up project, a screen version of Beryl Bainbridge’s story of a post-war Liverpool repertory theatre company and its struggles to stage a production of Peter Pan. The title, An Awfully Big Adventure, was a quote from a poignant line in J. M. Barrie’s play about the little boy who didn’t want to grow up: ‘To die will be an awfully big adventure.’
By general critical consensus, the lightweight Grant was disastrously miscast as the manipulative and vitriolic theatre director with whom the naïve young heroine falls in love without realising that he is homosexual. (The word is not in her ken.)
Not many people know, however, that Alan Rickman was offered the role of the waspish, cold-hearted Meredith first. The casting would have made a great deal of sense. ‘I asked Alan’s agent if it was the case that Alan doesn’t want to play villains,’ remembers Newell. ‘He said yes, that was the case, but that Alan would like to play the part of P. L. O’Hara instead.’
O’Hara is the film’s equivalent of the cavalry, riding to the rescue of the heroine (and the movie itself) on an old Norton motorbike. Just when you feel the story couldn’t get more leaden, along comes Rickman to wake things up. The result is a broken-backed piece of work that is fascinating only for a few well-observed cameos and for yet another of Alan Rickman’s scene-stealing performances.
‘He is not a chameleon actor, because he is very noticeable,’ says Peter James, principal of the London drama school LAMDA. ‘It seemed to me that Mesmer was the next logical step for him. You can’t cast him in absolutely anything, although he’s managed to cover a surprising breadth of roles. But it would be very difficult for him to play a plumber. He looks so elegant, so aristocratic.’ As opposed to Kenneth Branagh, who is forever being told (despite the kings he has played) that he looks like a plumber. Both Ken and Alan come from similar backgrounds – if anything, Branagh’s origins are more bourgeois – yet you would never associate Rickman with the tradesman’s entrance.
‘God didn’t mean him to play small roles,’ is Newell’s classic observation. ‘But I don’t agree that he couldn’t play a plumber; he would just make you feel that the plumber was a leading part.
‘In theatrical terms, he’s absolutely a star. But on film he’s a leading actor, a great big leading actor who graces any film he’s in. He’s financially very useful because people feel easier about investing in a film he makes.
‘Alan feels he’s a leading actor; in the theatre, he’s allowed to play a huge range of parts. In Hollywood he played villains before heroes, thus he has been typecast in villainy. That way he’s going to have a boring time; it limits him.
‘His villains are in fact warped tragic heroes. But he’s very canny, and doesn’t get that across in a wrong-headed way as some actors do. It’s difficult to get actors to play motiveless malignity; they want the devil to be understood, at least. On the contrary, I want to be satisfied in my villains, not for them to be understood!
‘Alan is pernickety sometimes; but then famous old actors like Ralph Richardson and Laurence Olivier were also pernickety about getting something absolutely right and pat. There is a sense of rhythm and fitness and being in the right place at the right time. But I had a harmonious relationship with him.
‘Affection is important to him,’ adds Newell. ‘He wants to have the sort of authority where people take advice from him. He’s a guru.’
Newell denies the rumour that there was a rancorous atmosphere between Rickman and Grant on An Awfully Big Adventure; Hugh’s encounter with the prostitute Divine Brown was to occur later, duly recorded by Emma Thompson’s Diary (‘“All right for some,” I thought’) on the filming of Sense And Sensibility.
Rickman and Grant are, however, completely different types, though Newell insists, ‘There was no coolness. But Alan does have a bit of Eeyore in him, though he would be puzzled if you pointed that out. It doesn’t strike him that he’s pessimistic.’
The one thing Grant and Rickman indisputably do have in common, of course, is their invaluable early dramatic experience as Old Latymerians. Hugh was also taught English and Drama by Alan’s old mentor, Colin Turner, and appeared in many school productions during the 70s. In 2001, Latymer Upper’s Head of Middle School Chris Hammond was invited to a party at Mel Smith’s London house where he found Alan Rickman and Hugh Grant reminiscing together about their days at Latymer, all rivalry between the first choice and second choice for the male lead in An Awfully Big Adventure apparently long forgotten.
Given his aversion to yet more screen villainy, it’s rather amusing to see Rickman briefly donning the mantle of a black-hearted fiend when P.L. O’Hara plays Captain Hook in Peter Pan with Hugh Grant’s Meredith taking over after O’Hara is drowned. There is no comparison between the two performances. O’Hara is also an intriguing mixture of hero and villain in his own right, befriending and sexually awakening the heroine without realising – until the devastating finale – that he is in fact seducing his own long-lost daughter. Both Meredith and O’Hara are seducers of the young and innocent; and when O’Hara tries to upbraid Meredith for his treatment of a youth, he is fatally compromised by his own cavalier behaviour.
‘There was a big difference in the two voices for Captain Hook,’ Newell admits. ‘Hugh had a thin tenor and Alan a great booming, baritone voice. It’s the difference between a film actor and a stage actor, because Alan is very much a theatre animal.
‘Alan is very ambiguous and enigmatic, very powerful. He stands still, which reinforces the enigma. He’s a calm actor rather than a tumultuous one; everything seems to come from a very deep and solid place. You are constantly invited further and further in, so you find yourself suckered in.
‘He’s what is known as a backfoot actor, with tremendous weight and talent. He would have been fairly obvious casting as Meredith; he would have been magnificent. He’s very difficult to miscast, because he hides everything.
‘I do regret not being able to go into O’Hara’s previous history before he was presented in the film. I wished I had actually shown his failed life as an actor, his cramped Maida Vale flat.’ In the event, however, the sad cast of Rickman’s haggard face said it all.
‘It was a great moment of revelation for Alan at the end of the film when O’Hara realises that he’s the father of Stella, the girl he’s seduced. He played the version without words; we had two versions. He said to me, “I know what you’re going to ask me, to do it without words.” And of course he had this amazing eloquence without words.
‘We used a Norton motorbike – the biggest bike we could get hold of, 450 cc or 500 cc. I wanted something truly huge, but this was the biggest, meanest bike the English made in those days. He rode the machine for 20 to 30 yards, then a stuntman took over. You are not supposed to notice the join.
‘An old bike like that is a cranky thing, and I was concerned about Alan breaking bones. I was very unhappy about him half-learning to ride it. I remember one time that it wasn’t quite in control. But he was very game.
‘As for the death scene, he fell just nine inches into the water; we showed the cast-iron wheel hitting his head, but in fact it was foam rubber. The sound effects did the rest.’
An Awfully Big Adventure contained Rickman’s first film sex scene, with P. L. O’Hara and Georgina Cates’s Stella both naked from the waist up for an unusually delicate and tenderly erotic deflowering of a virgin. We see a back view of Rickman, bending over her in bed: he might have been her tutor.
He certainly fitted Bainbridge’s description of O’Hara in the original novel: ‘in profile, the man appeared haughty, contemptuous almost.’ O’Hara clings to the rags and tatters of a thing he once called integrity, but the character is so tarnished by his equivocal relationship with Stella – partly paternalistic, partly predatory – that only Rickman’s strong and complex presence ensures he retains our sympathy. O’Hara’s doubts and misgivings are evident throughout.
Charles Wood’s screenplay was far too episodic to maintain a strong narrative, and most viewers will have been either bored or confused or both. An Awfully Big Adventure was a cinematic flop, going quickly to video.
So much for the dream team of Newell and Grant, with only Rickman and a few other stalwarts – Alun Armstrong as Stella’s uncle, Prunella Scales, Nicola Pagett and Carol Drinkwater – emerging with much credibility.
Mike Newell says, rather cruelly under the circumstances, that for the supporting cast of An Awfully Big Adventure, ‘I wanted people who were over the hill or about to be over the hill’. And Alan himself admitted in a location interview on Barry Norman’s Film 95: ‘It’s a strange film to be doing in a way, a bit like being a vulture on your own flesh . . . we have actors playing actors, using a stage for a film set and using our own lives as raw material. Georgina is remarkable . . . she claims to be seventeen but I’m going to put it out that she’s forty-three.’
He reminisced about his own days in rep: ‘I had to haul up my own cross because I was Inquisitor and ASM at the same time for a production of Shaw’s St Joan. And then I had to put the kettle on. Everyone’s memories of rep have that kind of mixture – pleasure and pain.’
There is precious little pleasure in An Awfully Big Adventure, compared with much pain and cynical back-biting, led by a hard-boiled Nicola Pagett and a jaded Carol Drinkwater.
The theme of lost innocence – pace Peter Pan – is brusquely handled in a relentlessly downbeat and depressing setting that should at least dissuade a few cross-eyed daughters of Mrs Worthington from following a hard life on the wicked stage.
It’s hard to care about anyone, not least the coldly self-contained young heroine Stella. Little wonder that An Awfully Big Adventure failed to catch fire at the box office, with most people attracted only by the names of Hugh Grant and Alan Rickman.
Variety magazine loathed it, calling the film ‘a dour, anti-sentimental coming-of-age story . . . a rather disagreeable look at the irresponsible and corrupting behaviour of adults toward youthful proteges’. Austerity Britain, indeed.
Rickman’s character was a misfit in more ways than one: he looked anachronistically modern, with a blond bob that inspired a catty story in the London Evening Standard about shipments of hair gel to the location in Dublin (there wasn’t enough of pre-war Liverpool left to shoot there).
This unglamorous evocation of his theatrical beginnings fired him up to go back to the stage with a long-held ambition. After one or two forays as a director, he wanted to flex his controlling muscles again. Ruby’s one-woman show had been really a matter of editing.
Rickman wanted to join the grown-ups and direct a proper drama, specifically Sharman Macdonald’s The Winter Guest – a project that had been thwarted by the failure of his Riverside bid. Even so, for someone who gives the impression of being the epitome of self-control, he was still oddly uncertain about his own capabilities. ‘When he wasn’t sure if he could do The Winter Guest, he asked me to look at it with a view to me doing it,’ says Richard Wilson. ‘And while he was directing it, he said to me, “Your name is mentioned often.”
‘But you always felt Alan should become a director – I’m surprised it took him so long. Alan is always being sought after for his advice. He gives it freely. I have asked him things too; he is a sort of guru.
‘He does go along to an enormous number of productions. He’s very supportive of friends who haven’t worked for a while, giving encouragement to them during bad spells. Now he’s a movie star, it doesn’t prevent him going to Fringe shows. And there’s no reason why it should.
‘My feeling is he would want to do both: act and direct. It’s nice to be able to think about your role and forget everyone else as an actor, because directing is tough. But I would be surprised if he ever left the theatre.’
For a Fringe salary of less than £200 a week, Rickman premièred The Winter Guest at West Yorkshire Playhouse in January 1995. A co-production with London’s fashionable Almeida Theatre, it starred Emma Thompson’s actress mother Phyllida Law. The play had come about through conversations between Alan and his old Les Liaisons co-star Lindsay Duncan. Back in the late 80s, Lindsay would visit her mother, a widow who had become seriously ill with Alzheimer’s disease, in a seaside town on the west coast of Scotland. Not that it was all gloom and doom: when they got together, there was much laughter and mutual comfort. From Duncan’s stories, Rickman gradually realised there was the genesis of a mother–daughter play in this; and who better than his old discovery to depict that most intense of all family relationships? Poignantly, Duncan’s mother, to whom the film was dedicated, died while Sharman was writing the play whose very title referred to winter’s most reliable visitor: Death.
At Leeds, the Guardian’s Michael Billington called it ‘a haunting, elliptical play about unresolved lives, beautifully directed by Alan Rickman’. Alastair Macaulay of the Financial Times thought ‘Rickman shows considerable skill as a director, not least in pacing. Nothing rings false’.
Charles Spencer in the Daily Telegraph felt: ‘Macdonald’s great gift is the ability to persuade an audience that it isn’t watching a play but rather the random, remarkable flow of life itself . . . beautifully drawn characters have come to seem like familiar friends by the end of Alan Rickman’s superbly acted production.’
The design was so effective at creating an icy seaside-town setting on the West Coast of Scotland that it took me back to marrow-freezing childhood holidays on bleak pebbly beaches in Montrose . . . as Mark Twain said of a summer in San Francisco, ‘the coldest winter I ever spent’. Rickman and his designer Robin Don communicated wordlessly by sending each other sketches.
When it opened in London two months later in March, my Daily Express review praised ‘the beautifully fluid production that dips in and out of four different couples’ lives in an almost cinematic way’. Jack Tinker in the Daily Mail wrote: ‘Alan Rickman directs with an unerring sense of place and occasion . . . An evening of magnetic and haunting charm.’ And Clive Hirshhorn of the Sunday Express called ‘this nostalgic tone poem . . . an unflashy little gem’.
Benedict Nightingale’s Times review was equally impressed: ‘This is a funny, touching, rather beautiful play: in the most literal sense, a haunting piece of writing.’ Yes, we were all beautifully spooked and transported.
Poor Rickman then sat and waited for the directing offers to pour in, as opposed to the acting offers that must have given his postman Repetitive Strain Injury from the weight of the scripts. ‘We were having lunch at my usual table at the Café Pelican in St Martin’s Lane and Alan was moaning that no one had asked him to direct again after The Winter Guest,’ remembers Peter Barnes. ‘I said, “Alan, don’t you realise that people have pigeon-holed you as an actor? They want to see you in front of the camera, not behind it!”’ Barnes adds, with some sympathy, ‘It’s very difficult for actors to become directors; I can think of only three or four who have pulled it off in the past.’ Yet he can see only too clearly why Rickman longs to do more directing in order to be in greater control of his career. ‘As an actor, you can only do what you’re offered. And one of the big dilemmas for any actor working in the movies is, do you actually make every film that’s offered to you if you’re free and the script doesn’t actually offend you, or do you select the scripts?’ says Peter. ‘Both decisions bring with them certain drawbacks: either you become a hack or, if you select, there are great gaps in your career. And there’s never any guarantee that a film is going to be good; you are in the hands of the director and the cast and a script that may seem good but which goes down the tubes suddenly. The problem is that you might have good instincts about a script, but there’s an awful long gap between the written word and the realisation on screen. Alan is intuitively good at selecting, but no one ever knows how things will work out. It’s a dilemma for intelligent actors.’
‘If Alan wanted to direct more, he could,’ insists Adrian Noble. ‘I don’t think he’s pining to be a director at all.’ And he recalls his 1985 RSC production of As You Like It, with Alan so perfectly cast as the Forest of Arden’s dandified drop-out Jaques. ‘You can’t be a Jaques type as a director, you have got to be Duke Senior. You have to say “We have to leave the forest today.” You don’t dally with being a director.’
Perhaps, then, there really is a hint of Jaques the intellectual dilettante about Alan Rickman. He finds it hard to stay in one place for long: he once told the journalist Valerie Grove in Harpers & Queen magazine that he liked to present ‘a moving target’. Hence all the obsessive travel, never happier than when on trains and boats and planes, from one film location to another.
‘Alan has a terrific visual sense; he gets cross about designs sometimes. He endlessly goes on about design not happening till rehearsals begin,’ adds Noble. ‘In fact that happened with our design for As You Like It, which didn’t materialise until six weeks after rehearsals started. And it was awful.
‘He is a fantastic collaborator: he has a peculiar blend of terrific analytical skill plus improvisational or group effort. He has a strong visual sense, and a sense of the function of theatre. But being pernickety is an actor’s prerogative, of an intelligent human being. Alan is careful.’
Rickman even hoped that he could turn The Winter Guest into a movie, perhaps encouraged by the critical use of the word ‘cinematic’. His big ambition was to direct on screen, and he had talks in Los Angeles with his old friend Niki Marvin over possible ideas.
But the general consensus on The Winter Guest was that this was a fragile tone poem unsuited to the wide sweep of cinema. That didn’t stop him from directing a film version in late 1996, however, with Phyllida Law and Emma Thompson.
He certainly loved the change of pace in directing on stage. ‘He has a wicked sense of humour, and he had a brilliant relationship with the younger members of cast,’ says an Almeida Theatre worker. ‘He behaves like a born father; I’m surprised he hasn’t got children of his own. But he’s not into small talk. He’s not frightening exactly, though he could be. He knows exactly what he wants.
‘When I first saw him, I was surprised that he hadn’t done anything about his teeth . . . But so many women are fascinated by him, my mother included.’
Directing The Winter Guest was an obvious move, given his Riverside ambitions to spread the scope of his talent. He told Michael Owen in the London Evening Standard on 10 March 1995: ‘It’s been like bringing the two disciplines of art school and drama school – which were both my background – together for the first time. A complete pleasure, until you come to that moment when, as it should be, the play passes into the hands of the actors. Then I feel a bit of an intruder, the guy with the coffee cup who keeps interfering.’
‘It was a very important thing for him – even more than winning the BAFTA awards,’ says Stephen Poliakoff.
When producer Niki Marvin’s film The Shawshank Redemption was nominated for eight awards in the 1995 Oscars, her mother Blanche asked Alan whether he was going to escort Niki to the ceremony in Los Angeles. He smiled but politely declined: ‘I’ll go when it’s my Oscar,’ he said with some determination.
The pull of acting, however, was still too strong. Emma Thompson had just finished a screenplay for Jane Austen’s Sense And Sensibility, commissioned four years earlier after the film producer Lindsay Doran had seen a comedy sketch about two sexually unawakened Victorian ladies from Emma’s BBC TV series Thompson. At the time, Doran was working with Emma and her then husband Kenneth Branagh on the latter’s film noir Dead Again.
It just so happened that Rickman had made another interesting little film noir called Murder, Obliquely for a 1993 American TV anthology under the series title of Fallen Angels. The play was eventually shown on British television’s BBC2 in 1995.
One of the producers of Murder, Obliquely was Lindsay Doran; and the executive producer was the veteran Sydney Pollack. In a passably languid American accent, Rickman had played the part of the wealthy and enigmatic Dwight Billings, over whom Laura Dern’s heroine nearly lost her reason. Despite the knowing voice-over and the retro costumes, this stylish exercise was just the right side of camp; and Rickman also gave it a weird kind of rumpled integrity. He looked like a human being, not an idealised eligible bachelor with a dark secret.
There was a hint of Scott Fitzgerald’s The Last Tycoon about the melancholy anti-hero of Cornell Woolrich’s short story, set in the 40s (though, as usual, Alan Rickman’s hair lived in a different decade).
Cleverly, the role added a sinister overlay to the familiar Rickman quality of sexual danger. There is a moment when the light hits Rickman’s left eye (the right one is coyly hidden behind a door), giving it a translucent, X-ray quality. Only then does it suddenly seem feasible that this likeable, vulnerable man, who has been valiantly trying to piece together the fragments of his heart, might have murdered the bosomy trollop who broke it. And who called him Billie, to add insult to injury. The puckered lips, the tight smile, the abject eyes of a man who is a prisoner to jealousy . . . he plays, with some subtlety, a pitiable victim turned aggressor. There is a sting in this tale.
And you realise he might just be asking Laura Dern to marry him at long last, after she’s given him more shameless encouragement than is strictly decent in a good girl, in order to provide himself with an alibi. Or just to kill her too, having acquired a taste for it. Even his butler Luther was slightly creepy.
For their next project, Doran and Pollack wanted the same ‘brooding romanticism’ that they had also seen him deliver in Truly Madly Deeply.
Sense And Sensibility controversially cast Alan Rickman as a doormat: the chivalrous, kindly and thoughtful middle-aged Colonel Brandon. It was dangerously close to playing a nonentity. Rickman was there to add gravitas to a cast led by Hugh Grant again, Thompson herself, rent-a-beau actor Greg Wise and newcomer Kate Winslet.
Brandon is almost a feminine role in the traditional mode, in that he must sit back and possess himself in patience while he waits for Marianne, the flighty young girl of his dreams, to grow up and see sense. Eventually he gets his chance to play the hero when he leaps on his horse for a secret mission whose outcome drives the narrative along; but most of the time he’s lurking discreetly in the background like the proverbial good deed in a naughty world. If he were a woman, he would be knitting and doing good works; here he stoically cleans his gun as if his life depends on it. (Very Freudian.)
To make a personality like this more than just a gentlemanly wimp represents a considerable challenge for an actor with edge; and no one has more edge than Alan Rickman.
In the novel, Brandon is a rather shadowy figure; Jane Austen’s men exist only in relation to her women. In the Taiwanese director Ang Lee’s film, Rickman gave Brandon the intensity of a soul in torment.
‘He accepts the relationship between Marianne and Willoughby with great grace and dignity,’ said Rickman later, explaining his take on the man. ‘He doesn’t ever assume that Marianne will return his feelings, and he behaves like a perfect gentleman even while watching the woman he loves fall in love with another man.
‘Brandon carries a fair amount of mystery with him, because of a long-ago love affair that went very wrong. And he hasn’t formed any close relationships since. Brandon is a very compassionate and feeling person. He becomes Marianne’s anchor, allowing her to mature from a creature of many moods to a wise young woman. So my job, really, is to present a very steadfast image, the opposite of the more mercurial Willoughby.’
Steadfast on screen, steadfast in life. What the screenplay doesn’t say – and Ang Lee ruthlessly cut out a melodramatic scene in which Brandon visits a fallen woman he once loved – Rickman expresses with his eloquent eyes. His face is puffy, middle-aged; at the age of 49, he’s playing a man that Thompson’s script says is 40 and Jane Austen described as 35. In truth, it gives him an extra dimension of vulnerability; and he immediately wins the sympathy vote.
Austen baldly described Brandon as ‘the most eligible bachelor in the county . . . though his face was not handsome, his countenance was sensible’. At first Rickman seems distinctly uncomfortable in passive mode as the lovesick Brandon, magnetically drawn to Marianne.
The film makes overt what the understated Austen style made covert. And the unfortunate goblin hat in outdoor scenes hardly helps: there are times when he’s in danger of looking like a nineteenth-century Diddyman.
For the first time in his movie career, Rickman was having to sell simple virtue without making it sanctimonious or boring, although it was not the first time that he had played a victim. He couldn’t even take refuge in the kind of scathing humour shown by the satirically-minded ghost Jamie in Truly Madly Deeply. And he met his directorial Waterloo in Ang Lee, who is a great believer in the dictatorship of the director (as opposed to the proletariat).
‘He likes to participate in the movie-making process, does Alan,’ says Stephen Poliakoff. ‘He sees himself as a participant.’ Alan picked holes in the direction, as is his wont. Do birds fly? Do fish swim? There were reports that Lee immediately warned Rickman not to overact (he also told Emma Thompson not to look so old and Hugh Grant not to be nerdy). And it was back to school for the entire cast as they were set 75-page essays to write on the motivation of their characters. Why I think Colonel Brandon is one of the good guys . . . by Alan Rickman. Or words to that effect.
There were dark mutterings of mutiny from Rickman, the most experienced film actor of all the principals, but nevertheless he picked up Ang Lee’s Best Director Golden Bear award for him at the Berlin Film Festival in February 1996. Clearly there were no hard feelings.
Yet Colonel Brandon is such an insubstantial part on the page that anyone, frankly, would succumb to the temptation to overact in order to bring him to life. Rickman duly absorbed Ang Lee’s t’ai chi philosophy of less is more and settled into the rhythm of the strong-and-silent act with grace and authority.
‘It’s true that I asked Alan to write an essay on his character,’ Ang Lee told me. ‘Alan was able to bring out the tragic depth and hidden righteousness of Colonel Brandon to make him an attractive character.
‘I wouldn’t say that I “warned” Alan not to overact; one doesn’t “warn” British actors not to overact,’ he added humorously. ‘Instead I encouraged him to act less and make Colonel Brandon a genuine man. Alan Rickman is a brilliant performer. His portrayal of life as an actor is maybe too good to be true to modern life, yet brilliant is brilliant.
‘His voice possesses a musical quality that produces a lyrical line-delivery. He can read off a telephone book and make each entry sound important, special and attractive.
‘He possesses an outstanding look. His presence is so impressive, and so unlike the character portrayed in the novel, that at first I thought casting him would be a risk,’ the director admits. ‘Alan, however, downplayed the inherent passive and unattractive characteristics of the character, as suggested by the novel, to make his Colonel Brandon an attractive man; in essence, he gave a real boost to Austen’s character.’
Neither was Rickman’s own directing experience an issue, according to Ang Lee. ‘Alan’s directing experience on stage has nothing to do with his performance as an actor,’ he explains. ‘Acting and directing aren’t related. As a director, you watch people. As an actor, you are watched. Though the two may co-exist in one person, they are definitely two different, separate creatures. I only know him as an actor.’
In one of the most prolonged pieces of foreplay between an actor and the audience in the history of the cinema, it seems an age before Rickman’s slow-burn Brandon makes his move and eventually gets the girl. ‘He’s the sort of man that everyone speaks well of, and no one remembers to talk to,’ sneers Greg Wise as Brandon’s spiteful rival Willoughby at one point. That’s the one line which doesn’t ring true with this casting: on the contrary, Rickman’s Brandon has far too much presence to be ignored.
Brandon’s air of mystery is second nature to Rickman; and he can also make the memory of grief still seem raw. ‘As Alan puts it,’ wrote Emma Thompson in Sense & Sensibility: The Diaries (published by Bloomsbury) on the making of the film, ‘it’s about a man thawing out after having been in a fridge for twenty years. The movement of blood and warmth back into unaccustomed veins is extremely painful.’
Nevertheless, there are still flashes of Alan’s old asperity (i.e. attitude) here and there. Brandon stirs himself out of his lovesick reverie when he stares challengingly at Willoughby, with that curdled look of jealousy which Rickman does so well. There is also one early scene in which Brandon immediately endears himself to his lady love’s young sister by satisfying her curiosity about the mysteries of the East Indies. In the kind of intimate gesture that is peculiar to Rickman, he leans forward and whispers sibilantly ‘The air is full of spices’ with one of his hot hisses. It’s a variation on the technique he uses to intimidate a screen enemy: far from being coldly aloof, he’s the ultimate in-your-face actor.
Rickman’s on-set composure even discombobulated Emma Thompson, as her Diaries records. ‘Sometimes Alan reminds me of the owl in Beatrix Potter’s Squirrel Nutkin. If you took too many liberties with him, I’m sure he’d have your tail off in a trice.’ Since Old Brown the owl held the impertinent rodent by the tail in order to skin him alive, that’s quite a menacing role-model. You can even see a distinct physical resemblance to Rickman in Potter’s illustration of Old Brown’s narrow amber eyes.
It was a remarkably apt analogy. She drew it after a sopping-wet Greg Wise had ‘bounded up to Alan and asked, with all his usual ebullience, how he was. Long pause, as Alan surveyed him through half-closed eyes from beneath a huge golfing umbrella. Then, “I’m dry.”’ Indeed, ‘dry’ just about sums him up.
Thompson’s description of her own character Elinor – ‘a witty, Byronic control-freak’ – in fact fits Alan exactly. If you want romantic gravity, you reach for Rickman. As Emma gushed in a BBC2 documentary Sense And Sensibility: Behind The Scenes, ‘Colonel Brandon is the man of all our dreams: the wounded older man who’s a river of compassion and love and strength and honour and decency.’ For Ang Lee, ‘Colonel Brandon was the only solid man, the real man in the movie.’
Thompson’s Diaries recalls how she and Alan talked seriously about the rigours of theatre over lunch in his trailer: ‘He was as much put off by two years in Les Liaisons as I was by fifteen months in Me And My Girl.’
But much of the time on set, he earned his keep as the king of the wry one-liners. When Thompson’s co-star Kate Winslet complained, ‘Oh God, my knickers have gone up my arse,’ Alan’s reply was: ‘Ah: feminine mystique again.’
ET was consequently much impressed by Rickman’s mature mixture of gallantry and irony. ‘He was splendid, charming and virile . . . (At) the party on Saturday, Alan nearly killed me, whirling me about the place.’ (As with many big men, he doesn’t always realise his own size and strength.)
‘Alan’s very moving,’ she later recorded. ‘He’s played Machiavellian types so effectively that it’s a thrill to see him expose the extraordinary sweetness in his nature. Sad, vulnerable but weighty presence. Brandon is the real hero of this piece, but he has to grow on the audience as he grows on Marianne . . . Finish scene with Alan. Me: Oh! I’ve just ovulated. Alan (long pause): Thank you for that.’ She marvelled later about how ‘Alan manages to bring such a depth of pain’ to what is, in effect, the plot of a penny dreadful.
But the old tartness, thank God, was never far away. It’s a relief, in the middle of all these eulogies, to read his reaction to a trespassing moggie.
‘Very nice lady served us drinks in hotel and was followed in by a cat,’ Emma’s journal chronicled. ‘We all crooned at it. Alan to cat (very low and meaning it) “Fuck off.” The nice lady didn’t turn a hair. The cat looked slightly embarrassed but stayed.’ Perhaps he was under strain from being so nice all the time . . .
The chance to play against type was a huge relief for Rickman. Sense And Sensibility also reunited him with an old mate, the actress Harriet Walter, who was on brilliantly malignant form as the snobbish Fanny Dashwood, the nearest that Jane Austen got to a traditional wicked step-sister.
After Brandon’s nuptials to Marianne, he follows the custom of throwing a handful of coins in the air. One hits the frightful Fanny, and the film ends with a glimpse of her backwards collapse into a bush, a piece of comic business she and Rickman invented.
‘We are the envy of other countries because we have the identification with the theatre. It’s a heartbeat. In America they really envy it. And for me, Alan is one of the forces of gravity in theatre,’ says Harriet.
‘It’s not to do with throwing a lot of parties. He had that effect on people long before he was famous. He has high standards and he takes you seriously – you feel elevated, you think that someone out there is looking out for you. He manages to keep that interest in other people going.
‘You endow people like this with power, but of course you need to be critical yourself. It’s up to you to be grown-up. I don’t always agree with him, but we are aiming at the same centre. He has pretty tough standards, and I might rebel for a day or two.
‘But he’s a very good listener. He takes you seriously, you feel encouraged. That’s why we have kept up as friends for so long.’
Movie-making is a schizophrenia-inducing business, however, and Colonel Brandon remains one of Alan Rickman’s least interesting parts even though he did his damnedest with it. He went straight from playing the nice guy to portraying that practitioner of the political black arts, Eamon de Valera, the man who is popularly supposed to have ordered the assassination on a lonely country road of one of the great Irish heroes. The career of Eamon de Valera forms a direct trajectory to the career of the current Sinn Fein president, Gerry Adams.