AFTER FINISHING RASPUTIN, Alan needed a rest from the business, even though his three awards for Rasputin were to make him more in demand than ever. In his case, there were very personal reasons for dropping out of circulation for a while: his octogenarian mother had been unwell since 1995, so he began to spend more time in London.
Just before making Rasputin he had also fitted in a blink-and-you’ve-missed-him performance in Lumière and Company, a short documentary to mark the centennial of those pioneering film-makers the Lumière Brothers, with François Mitterand, Isabelle Huppert and Liam Neeson among the cast and David Lynch and Spike Lee among the directors. At the beginning of 1996, he told friends that he was taking a long-delayed break for a few months before beginning work on the film of The Winter Guest. When Huppert came over from Paris to prepare for her role in Schiller’s Mary Stuart at London’s National Theatre, Rickman acted as escort and squired her round town, throwing parties to introduce her to people. Back in 1993, when his consortium made its bid for Riverside, he was to have played opposite Huppert in Strindberg’s Miss Julie, a much-postponed pet project.
While he was beginning pre-production work on the film version of The Winter Guest, Margaret Rickman became increasingly poorly. Alan was acutely aware that his peripatetic career had kept them apart for long periods. Later, while ostensibly talking about The Winter Guest’s central mother-daughter relationship, he was to give away clues to that difficult time in his life: ‘It’s a moment that comes to many of us, that point when the roles switch and the child must become the parent. You either accept the responsibility and look after your parents or you don’t.’
When Emma Thompson came on board to play her own mother’s daughter in the film, Rickman had signed the Oscar-winner who would guarantee the finances. As he explained to the Los Angeles Times in 1997, ‘Whenever the film version came up, it was sort of automatically assumed that Emma would do it too. She helped finance the project,’ he admitted, ‘but it’s also a great part for her as well as being a great gift to her mother.’ Alan felt a particular affinity with Phyllida Law, who had, he pointed out, been widowed young like his own mother. Margaret had brought up four children on her own, while Phyllida raised Emma and her younger sister Sophie after the death of their father Eric Thompson. As he acknowledged, the casting of a real-life mother and daughter ‘could have been a nightmare, they might have been horribly competitive or their real-life relationship might have been incredibly complicated to shake off. But their complementary acting styles and the ‘bonus’ of their physical resemblance turned them into a dream-team.
Yet, in order to cast Emma, Rickman had to drop the Welsh actress Sian Thomas who had played her role on stage to great acclaim. He hated cutting Sian out of the equation, but it had to be; though he was tired of playing screen villains, Rickman was to discover the hard way that sometimes a director has to play the bad guy for the good of the film. ‘It was tough for her and me and it was a difficult thing to cope with in one’s head; we’ll do something else [together] down the line and I just hope that somehow makes up for it,’ he said.
Despite the beautiful performances, however, the film is curiously inert, at times too reminiscent of a studio-bound television play. You may find yourself wondering why there are no frosty gusts of breath issuing from the mouths of the characters, who spend much of their time talking outdoors in the frozen wastes of a Scottish mid-winter, but that was because Rickman shot the film in a string of Fife fishing villages from October to December 1996 with the art department supplying the ice and snow that hadn’t arrived in real life. The frozen sea was created in the computer; what a pity they didn’t muster up ice-cubes for the actors to suck to make the setting look cold enough. A location like Iceland, Rickman explained, would have been ‘too cold – and you won’t get the insurance to put your actors on the ice’.
By filming a story with such a wintry setting, no one could say that he made things easy on himself as a first-time director; but would we expect anything else? ‘It was a great experience, but sometimes it was just awful,’ Rickman admitted. As he told the Boston Globe, ‘My friend Bob Hoskins says film-making is like being pecked to death by pigeons; I would use a more violent bird. I suppose I saw it as a challenge – why not take it on?’
Why, indeed? In early 1997, while he was in the middle of editing The Winter Guest, Margaret Rickman died. ‘He got very in on himself in that period when his mother died; he was very close to her,’ recalls Peter Barnes. ‘The film didn’t help; that subject matter is not a barrel of laughs at the best of times.’ Even Alan himself admitted that for him, the winter guest of the title was ‘a moment in the life of everyone when you have to grow up quickly’. It certainly was the ultimate maturing experience, that moment when the middle-aged man finally became an orphan and lost the one person who had always continued to indulge him on some level as a child. And for those who don’t have their own children, the sense of bereavement is even bleaker.
But Alan doesn’t rant and rail and beat his breast; instead he retreats crablike into his shell (also a very manlike reaction, of course). He was determined not to allow himself to wallow in despair, either on or off screen. Yet despite changing the original tragic ending of the stage version and stubbornly describing the film as ‘a hymn to life’, Alan’s wanly delicate directorial debut seemed mired in gloom – though without being Bergman. Some viewers felt, and audiences seemed to agree, that the film was rather precious – in the wrong sense; although it had its admirers among the critics and it won three awards (including the prestigious Golden Lion at the 1997 Venice Film Festival), the lack of narrative drive hardly set the art-house box-office on fire.
The same charge was levelled at Rickman’s next two projects that same year, with Alan returning to acting for the movies Dark Harbor and Judas Kiss. Rickman justified jumping back on the performing treadmill again by saying rather defensively to the Boston Globe, ‘Acting is not something I’ll stop doing. I can’t see how.’ He was anxious to reassure himself, after the loss in his own life, that it was business as usual; hardly ideal circumstances under which to make fully focused choices. Yet both movies were offbeat projects that carried the adrenaline-producing element of risk to which Rickman always responded. Dark Harbor, he hoped, would turn out to be ‘another strange love story in the vein of The Crying Game’. He played the husband, his first spousal role since Close My Eyes, in an arctic marriage that ices up even further with the arrival of a mysterious and good-looking stranger. The latter comes into the lives of a couple when they rescue him after an accident in which he nearly became roadkill. Playing the wife was Polly Walker, star of Peter Barnes’s Oscar-nominated Enchanted April, with newcomer Norman Reedus completing the triangle as the stranger to unsettling effect. Despite good reviews for the performances – and in particular, a role that astutely deployed the Rickman quality of tumultuous mystery – this wannabe Hitchcock was pulled from its US theatrical release and went straight to video.
From Dark Harbor’s location in Maine, he flew straight to Pasadena to film the quirky Judas Kiss, which was also pulled from theatrical release and subsequently premièred on Cinemax cable TV in 1999. Though some critics detected the influences of Pedro Almodóvar and Quentin Tarantino in the film, it was by general consensus filed under ‘cult’ – always a useful way of hedging bets. But it did reunite Alan with Emma Thompson for the third time, one of the reasons why he had agreed to do it. As soul-mates in socialism with the same facetious sense of humour, they had become good friends. And, in the roles of an alcoholic police detective and an FBI agent respectively, Rickman and Thompson proved to be dryly amusing in what Variety magazine called ‘a wannabe film noir that’s badly in need of a rewrite.’ It gave Emma a gun-toting peach of a part, and it also cast her new partner Greg Wise, whom she had met on the set of Sense and Sensibility. Alan, by now permanently on the run from screen villainy, saw the chance to escape into lugubrious black comedy in this efficiently plotted but unsparkling script by a first-time writer-director who had been working as a Columbia TV stagehand until just before his metamorphosis into a would-be Raymond Chandler.
To compound the problems, Alan’s old knee injury from Die Hard began playing up during the middle of filming Judas Kiss and left him in so much pain that he had to see a doctor. There was to be no let-up, though, because his next film project was due to start shooting in Memphis in February 1998. Rickman was cast as an angel with attitude in Dogma – the latest project from Kevin Smith, the loquacious, self-indulgent writer-director who might one day be a genius if only he allowed himself a tougher editor.
Before arriving in Memphis, however, Rickman paid a flying visit to London to deliver a speech at the National Film Theatre that attacked his old alma mater, the Royal Shakespeare Company, and conclusively showed that the old campaigner in him had not been de-fanged by celebrity success. It’s difficult to think of any other actor with his international reputation who gets stuck into the politics of the British arts scene in this way, but Alan is as much a maverick as the parts he plays. He had discovered two remarkable schoolboy actors, Douglas Murphy and Sean Biggerstaff, for the cast of The Winter Guest, he remains heavily involved in fundraising for his old drama school RADA and he takes his growing reputation as a mentor for young people seriously. Impulsiveness is not a quality you immediately associate with Alan, but when he feels deeply about something, as Jules Wright discovered, he doesn’t hesitate to give it plenty of welly.
Word had reached Rickman of some RSC company members’ unhappiness. Never having forgotten his own bad experiences there as a young actor, he called the organisation ‘a factory’. ‘It’s all about product endlessly churned out – and not sufficiently about process,’ claimed Rickman. ‘They don’t look after the young actors. There are a lot of people who slip through the net. People are dropping like flies.’ The RSC hit back by accusing Rickman of being ‘out of touch’, pointing out that the RSC was ‘one of the few companies actively concerned about nurturing and developing young talent’. Yet their subsequent troubles at the beginning of the 21st century – widespread opposition eventually engulfed Artistic Director Adrian Noble, leading to his decision to stand down after he had dared to make radical changes to the RSC – were to show that the prescient Rickman could claim to have had his ear to the ground two years earlier.
One of the reasons why Rickman manages to stay in touch with what’s hip, why he is considered so cool by people half his age, is that he always takes care to listen to and talk to the younger generation, something he calls ‘passing on the baton’. He drags friends along to see such eclectic theatrical innovators as Pina Bausch and the stand-up comic surrealist Eddie Izzard, who has since followed Alan into acting – including a much-admired West End performance in a revival of Peter Nichols’ A Day In The Death Of Joe Egg.
‘Alan is still very much in touch with the whole simplicity of the process; he stays in touch with the basic elements,’ explains Peter James, who persuaded Rickman to give talks to his LAMDA students. ‘Fame and money came later to him; it’s always a better way for it to happen than for young actors who have it too soon. He has astonishing leadership and spokesman qualities and he has passionate views on subjects and issues: training, the subsidy of theatre, new young actors.’ As the RSC found out.
Rickman went on to send himself up alongside a young cast by playing Metatron, a black-clad, spiky-haired angel or ‘seraphim’ without genitals – as Rickman takes pains to show Linda Fiorentino in the film – but with a hotline to God in the cosmic conspiracy-theory movie Dogma. Kevin Smith had written the script while he was still shooting the film that made his name: the award-winning Clerks. Rickman first appears in Linda Fiorentino’s bedroom in a blaze of flames put out only by a fire extinguisher: ‘Sweet Jesus, do you have to use the whole can?’ he screeched. There are those – particularly the self-styled Rickmaniacs on one of Alan’s many websites – who argue that he overdid the black eyeliner and sooty hair, which were to be revisited later in Harry Potter. But he got forgiven when this crotchety angel discovered his inner cherub and walked on water to comfort Fiorentino in a wonderful example of Rickman’s ability to switch from sour to sweet instantaneously. As Mesmer had revealed, films are collaborative experiences; the gourmandising side of Metatron, who demonstrated his superhuman powers by whisking everyone to a ritzy restaurant, was suggested by the bon viveur in Rickman.
Rickman followed up Dogma with more self-mockery in the film Galaxy Quest by creating the perfect parody of a self-obsessive Shakespearean actor reaching his career nadir by playing an alien in a long-running sci-fi series and then getting so locked into that character that a bunch of genuine visiting aliens mistook him for the real thing. If he had been a more limited actor, it could be said that he risked cannibalising himself – as Mike Newell’s so-called ‘over-the-hill’ cast were sometimes in danger of doing on An Awfully Big Adventure. Interestingly, Galaxy Quest’s star, the comedian Tim Allen, seems uncannily like a younger version of Alan Rickman with the same feral looks, though Rickman would never be seen mugging as shamelessly as Allen can do. ‘How did I come to this? I played Richard III with five curtain calls; I was an actor once,’ gloomed Alan’s character, staring at his alien reflection in the make-up mirror. And indeed he might stare, with Rickman resplendent in a sort of fossilised ram’s head that turned his character into a distant relative of Mr Spock from Star Trek.
Galaxy Quest was a cunning, well-sustained romp, with lots of subtle jokes about show business along the way, such as: how do you tell the difference between aliens and obsessive fans? It’s so marginal sometimes . . . Of course, for an alien species to be so inspired by a sci-fi show that it bases its entire culture on Galaxy Quest was the ultimate accolade for anyone’s acting talents. On top of which, Alan got to do the first punch-up in his movie career with Allen’s vain leading man. So much for those who say he never mixes it; that he’s too aloof; inside that glacial English exterior, there is an Irish-Welsh bruiser.
Such a diverse trio of roles one after the other had established a satisfying distance between Alan and the screen villainy that made his name. But then, out of the blue, came the great Asp Disaster in October 1998 that would, for a while at least, blight his stage career and expose a speech impediment which had never once been apparent in the films that liberated him. Yet, to be fair to Rickman, it had never been so apparent on stage either until his ill-starred Antony and Cleopatra. With someone like Alan, who always takes aeons to decide what he will do, one wonders why on earth he decided, on the turn of a sixpence, to take on such a major role as Antony on the cruelly exposed Olivier stage in a production by Sean Mathias, a hot young director who had made his mark in the West End with a sex-drenched production of Noël Coward’s already sexy troilism play Design For Living, but who had never directed Shakespeare before.
Perhaps the fates were against it from the outset, for Rickman took over from Alan Bates who had been contracted to play Antony for some time but then pleaded a knee injury. Not that taking another man’s leavings would worry Rickman – he certainly has an ego, but not to that extent. And the profession is full of stories of people who took on roles almost by default, only to triumph; from 42nd Street onwards, it’s the stuff of show business legend.
Nevertheless it was a big decision to make in a hurry. ‘It’s a mystery why Alan Rickman did Antony,’ says an exasperated Peter Barnes. ‘He had once played a very small part in a production of Antony and Cleopatra by Peter Brook, so maybe that’s why he wanted to do the lead part all these years later. But I said to him, “Why the hell did you decide to do it with that director?”’
The truth is that actors are often attracted to a project because of the other names in the cast. Helen Mirren was already on board as Queen of the Nile so Rickman did the gallant thing and leaped into the breach left by Bates to play opposite one of the world’s great performers. Not only was Mirren an international name from playing Jane Tennison in Lynda La Plante’s ground-breaking detective series Prime Suspect, but also a heavyweight classical actress with a most un-English sensuality that had earned her the nickname of the RSC sexpot in her early stage career. She was no less sexy in her 50s, deciding to go topless in Cleopatra’s death scene. The stage coupling of Rickman and Mirren was widely seen as a dream-team, and it set the box-office on fire, selling out the production long before the reviews were published.
Yet Tim Hatley’s cumbersome and clunking stage design overwhelmed the actors and the all-important intimacy of the play, which would have been better served in the Cottesloe studio theatre – always the actors’ choice – than the problematic Olivier. His voice already muffled slightly by a short moustache and beard grown for the part, Alan retreated into himself and often became inaudible – a problem compounded night after night as the impact of the bad reviews gathered momentum. Most were excruciating, with the headline writers having a field day, though some damned with faint praise instead. ‘The grand fall of the great warrior becomes more of a drunken stagger into disillusionment and despair,’ wrote the Stage’s Tara Conlan, while acknowledging that Rickman ‘does bring out Antony’s common humanity and his war-weariness – when you can hear him.’
So much for the one original idea in Mathias’s production – that the battle-weary Antony should, very plausibly, be an alcoholic. It seemed to have fallen as flat as the rest of the evening, with Mathias lacking the experience in Shakespeare to articulate his theme.
But Rickman was never going to be the ideal man of action; more the ideal man of inaction. With his last Shakespearean role, Hamlet, still lingering in his mind, Alan’s Antony was in truth more middle-aged Prince of Denmark than decorated hero of old Rome – as Michael Coveney’s perceptive review alone suggested. ‘Rickman’s Mark Antony is a spineless poet of a warrior, caught with tragic splendour.’ Coveney did add that ‘his articulation could be sharper. But in his case, what else is new? He cuts a marvellously shambolic and charismatic figure.’ But with the production failing to make clear its governing idea that Rickman’s slurred diction was deliberately imitating an alcoholic, it was an unforgivable bodge that left the hapless actor in the role of the fall guy. Yet it was always going to be a tremendous risk for someone with a speech impediment to make his voice more slurred than usual, and many of the critics simply made the assumption that he couldn’t speak the verse.
Nearly three years later, when the dust had settled, Rickman tried to defend the production in a BBC News 24 interview: ‘I was playing somebody who was basically an alcoholic. And I think people got very upset that they weren’t seeing a great hero. The point about the play, to me, is that you see these childlike people who were once great and they’re now reduced to being drunk, rowing, throwing things at each other . . . It’s the most extraordinary deconstruction of a great duo, and they’re presented as little children.’ He was to take the same theme later that year and deconstruct Noël Coward’s spoiled Elyot and Amanda in Private Lives; but with Mark Antony, it was a deconstruction too far in trying to turn elements of the play into a Shakespearean Who’s Afraid Of Virginia Woolf? Particularly when some of the most peerless poetry in the English language had to be delivered in the middle of their spats.
Some elements of the media, scenting blood and detecting a lack of on-stage chemistry between the two leads, stirred things up and tried to make a crisis out of a drama by citing alleged bad karma between Rickman and Mirren as a reason for the fiasco in the first place. But with reviews like the ones the production was receiving, the alleged lack of chemistry would become a self-fulfilling prophecy. ‘I hadn’t heard that they fell out, but it’s easy to fall out if you are in a desperate production,’ says Barnes. ‘You get to the point where you hate going on stage.’
Stories of difficult rehearsals, where the lack of communication between the director and at least one of the leading members of the cast was apparent, had indeed seeped out. Sheridan Morley hit the mark in his Spectator review, when he wrote of an Alan Rickman ‘so patently exhausted and dispirited, presumably from rehearsals, that his defeat at the hands of the Romans and Cleopatra herself . . . also came as no surprise. Whether Alan Bates would have survived any better is debatable.’
Rickman angrily refuted the charge that Cleopatra and her Antony were not getting on: ‘I’ve never been closer to an actress on stage than I was in that production. And off-stage the greatest of friends . . . People wanted to create some kind of furore off-stage as well as on.’
Just as well that Antony and Cleopatra had been planned as a limited season of only 54 performances, for careers can be damaged by a long run in such a critically savaged production. There are, of course, exceptions: Peter O’Toole’s much-panned Macbeth became a must-see, rather like an on-stage car crash, and it merely confirmed him as a maverick steer.
Although Alan was later to tell the BBC that Antony and Cleopatra was a success by virtue of being a sell-out (in the box-office sense), at the time he was so devastated by the adverse reaction that he told his producer friend Paddy Wilson that he doubted whether he would ever go on stage again. And this at a time when American movie stars were already forming long orderly queues to prove their serious acting credentials by appearing on the ultimate live arena, the London stage. But as Paddy knew only too well from their days in rep, when the passive-aggressive Rickman is seriously unhappy with a production, he digs his heels in and retreats into himself – with the inevitable result of an underpowered, muffled performance.
Yet the great shock, of course, was that he had first made his name on stage as a character who was a byword for vicious power and control. Suddenly, it seemed that Alan Rickman had lost it.