© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
R. Shamey, R. G. KuehniPioneers of Color Sciencehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30811-1_31

31. Young, Thomas 1773–1829

Renzo Shamey1  
(1)
Color Science and Imaging Laboratory, North Carolina State University, Wilson College of Textiles, Raleigh, NC, USA
 
 
Renzo Shamey
../images/336076_1_En_31_Chapter/336076_1_En_31_Figa_HTML.png

Wikimedia, Public Domain

Thomas Young was an English polymath with interests ranging from physics to Egyptology. He was born in 1773, in Somerset, England into a large Quaker family1 and had nine siblings. He was a child prodigy, learnt to read by age two, and taught himself Latin at age six. Young has been described as “The Last Man Who Knew Everything” [1]. He died in London in 1829 at the age of fifty-five.

At the age of fourteen, Young had learned Greek and Latin and was acquainted with French, Italian, Hebrew, German, Aramaic, Syriac, Samaritan, Arabic, Persian, Turkish, and Amharic languages [2].

Young began to study medicine in London at St Bartholomew’s Hospital in 1792, moved to the University of Edinburgh Medical School in 1794, and a year later went to Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany, where he obtained the degree of doctor of medicine in 1796 from the University of Göttingen. In 1793, he offered an explanation of how the eye accommodates itself to vision at different distances based on changes in the curvature of the eyes crystalline lens [3]. In 1797, he entered Emmanuel College, Cambridge. In the same year, he inherited the estate of his granduncle, Richard Broscklesby, which made him financially independent, and in 1799, he established himself as a physician at 48 Welbeck Street, London (now recorded with a blue plaque). Young published many of his first academic articles anonymously to protect his reputation as a physician.

As a gentleman of independent means, Thomas Young had a keen interest in science. Although he had decided on a career in medicine, he did not substantially practice but continued scholarly studies at Emmanuel College, in Cambridge. In 1801, he was appointed a professor of natural philosophy (mainly physics) at the Royal Institution and in the same year proposed that three types of retinal particles might exist, each associated with one of the principal colors “red, yellow, and blue” [4]. In 1802, he became foreign secretary for the Royal Society. In an 1803 paper, he changed his primary colors to red, green, and violet. While it is debated whether Young was the first to propose this idea, his views were one of the earliest statements pertaining to the fundamental property of “trichromacy” that characterizes human spectral discrimination.

Young resigned his professorship in 1803, fearing that its duties would interfere with his medical practice. His lectures were published in 1807 in Course of Lectures on Natural Philosophy and the mechanical arts [5] containing a number of anticipations of later theories.

In 1811, Young became a physician to St George’s Hospital, and in 1814, he served on a committee appointed to consider the dangers involved in the general introduction of gas into London. In 1816, he was secretary of a commission charged with ascertaining the precise length of the second’s or seconds pendulum (the length of a pendulum whose period is exactly 2 s), and in 1818, he became secretary to the Board of Longitude and superintendent of HM Nautical Almanac Office.

In 1827, Young was chosen as one of the eight foreign associates of the French Academy of Sciences. In 1828, he was elected a foreign member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

31.1 Trichromatic Color Vision and Wave Theory of Light

Among the early conceptual ideas regarding Young’s color vision theory was his hypothesis that vision depends on three kinds of “nerve fibers,” (today known as the three cone types in the retina of the eyes), a concept that was later expanded by H. von Helmholtz. Young had briefly presented this idea in the 1801 Bakerian Lecture: on the theory of light and colors, which was published in 1802 [4]. In this lecture, Young expressed his ideas as follows:

Now it is almost impossible to conceive each sensitive point of the retina to contain an infinite number of particles, each capable of vibrating in perfect unison with every possible undulation, it becomes necessary to suppose the number limited, for instance, to the three principal colours, red, yellow, and blue, of which the undulations are related in magnitude nearly as the numbers 8, 7 and 6…. and each sensitive filament of the nerve may consist of three portions, one for each principal colour.

In Young’s own judgment, of his many achievements the most important was to establish the wave theory of light. However, he would have to overcome a major obstacle, Isaac Newton’s century-old views described in “Opticks” according to which light consisted of particles. Nevertheless, Young put forth a number of theoretical reasons supporting the wave theory of light and developed two enduring demonstrations to support this viewpoint. On 24 November 1803, Thomas Young described his historic experiment to the Royal Society of London, which was destined to become a classic. He started his lecture in the following way…

The experiments I am about to relate… may be repeated with great ease, whenever the sun shines, and without any other apparatus than is at hand to everyone.

The lecture was published in the following year’s Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, [6] and is still reprinted and read today. Thus, with the ripple tank, he demonstrated the idea of interference in the context of water waves and with his interference or double-slit experiment, and he demonstrated interference in the context of light as a wave.

In the paper entitled Experiments and Calculations Relative to Physical Optics, published in 1804, Young described an experiment in which he placed a narrow card (approx. 1/30th in.) in a beam of light from a single opening in a window and observed the fringes of color in the shadow and to the sides of the card [6]. He observed that placing another card before or after the narrow strip, such that to prevent light from the beam from striking one of its edges, caused the fringes to disappear. This supported his notion that light is composed of waves. Young performed and analyzed a number of experiments, including interference of light from reflection off nearby pairs of micrometer grooves, from reflection off thin films of soap and oil, and from Newton’s rings. Figure 31.1 shows an illustration from his lecture notes published in 1807.
../images/336076_1_En_31_Chapter/336076_1_En_31_Fig1_HTML.png
Fig. 31.1

Plate from “Course of Lectures” of 1802, published in 1807 [5]

Young also performed two important diffraction experiments using fibers and long narrow strips. In his Course of Lectures on Natural Philosophy and the Mechanical Arts [5], he gives Grimaldi credit for first observing the fringes in the shadow of an object placed in a beam of light. Within ten years, much of Young’s work was reproduced and then extended by Fresnel.

As Young pointed out “The nature of light is a subject of no material importance to the concerns of life or to the practice of the arts, but it is in many other respects extremely interesting…