Chapter 6

THE 1971 LOK SABHA POLL AND ITS IMPACT ON HARYANA

Two significant events that took place way back in 1972 still remain etched in my memory. The first was my visit to Shimla (then spelt Simla) at the time of June-July 1972 India—Pakistan summit (details given later in this chapter). This summit was held in the wake of Pakistan’s defeat in the December 1971 war, which led to the creation of a new nation called Bangladesh. At Shimla, India was represented by none other than Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and Pakistan by her counterpart, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. (Bhutto was eventually executed on 4 April 1979.) It was then that I saw Benazir Bhutto (then 19 years old) who had accompanied her father and went on a shopping spree in the hill state capital’s main commercial centre. She went on to become Pakistan’s prime minister twice (first in 1988 and next in 1993). Unfortunately, she was assassinated on 27 December 2007 (more details are given later in this chapter).

The second was the way in which Bansi Lal managed to secure his second term in office (in 1972) by seeking a mid-term poll in Haryana. This step was taken in the backdrop of the March 1971 Lok Sabha mid-term elections.

***

In 1970 Indira Gandhi faced strong opposition from the National Democratic Front, an alliance made up of the Indian National Congress (O; O stood for Organization), the Bharatiya Jan Sangh, the Swatantra Party, the Samyukta Socialist Party and the Praja Socialist Party. The Congress (O), which was led by K. Kamaraj (a former Congress president and a former chief minister of Madras state, as Tamil Nadu was known earlier) and Morarji Desai (a former Union minister who went on to become the prime minister of India in late March 1977), used to be described as ‘the Syndicate’ by its critics. (Kamaraj and Desai were in the rival camp vis-à-vis Indira Gandhi after the Congress split in 1969.) She feared that the NDF would destabilize her government. She opted for mid-term elections to the Lok Sabha, which were held in March 1971. Her party – the Congress (I; I standing for Indira) — won with a thumping majority. Her slogan ‘Garibi Hatao’ (remove poverty) had triumphed over the opposition NDF’s clamour of ‘Indira Hatao’.

Indira Gandhi soon faced a series of problems both domestically and internationally, which she tried to tackle as firmly as possible. The most serious problem pertained to the influx (into India) of large numbers of refugees from what was then called East Pakistan. These people were fleeing their country to escape the numerous atrocities being committed on them by the West Pakistani Army. Also, as the situation created by the Pakistani Army’s skirmishes with Indian forces in East Pakistan deteriorated, Pakistan declared war on 3 December 1971 with pre-emptive air strikes on a number of Indian military airfields and radar installations on the western sector and a simultaneous ground offensive from Poonch (in Jammu and Kashmir) to Sulaimanke (in Pakistan, adjacent to Fazilka, in the Indian part of Punjab). The Indian armed forces immediately swung into action to counter the Pakistani assault. Lasting just 13 days, it is considered one of the shortest conventional wars in history, which India won.

During the course of the war, Indian and Pakistani forces clashed on both the eastern and western fronts. The war effectively came to an end after the Eastern Command of the Pakistan armed forces signed the Instrument of Surrender, perhaps the only public surrender to date, on 16 December 1971 at Dhaka (then spelt Dacca). Following this development, East Pakistan seceded from the composite Pakistan to become an independent state called Bangladesh. Around 93,000 Pakistani troops who laid down their arms in Dhaka (the largest surrender since the Second World War) were taken as prisoners of war (POWs) by India.

Pakistan’s defeat had mellowed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who was prepared to recognize Bangladesh provided India first released all the Pakistani POWs. Besides, he also suggested the possibility of converting the ceasefire line in Jammu and Kashmir into a permanent boundary between India and Pakistan. This led to the aforementioned summit meeting on 28 June 1972 between Indira Gandhi and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto at Shimla. The negotiations eventually led to the signing of the Simla Agreement at around 12.30 a.m. on 2 July 1972. The agreement laid down the principles that should govern the future relations between the two countries. It also highlighted the steps to be taken for further normalization of mutual relations.

The most important of these steps, as suggested by Indira Gandhi, was that the Jammu and Kashmir ceasefire line should be redesignated as the Line of Control (LOC), a political rather than a military measure which, in due course, could be endowed with the characteristics of an international border by locating customs and immigration posts along a soft frontier. The agreement also bound the two countries ‘to settle their differences by peaceful means through bilateral negotiations’.

As mentioned earlier, I happened to be in Shimla at the time of the summit. During Benazir’s five-day stay in the ‘queen of the hills’, I watched the 19-year-old future prime minister of Pakistan strolling along The Mall with curious crowds following her while she visited the famous shopping centres and bought numerous items.

Sixteen years later, when her Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) won the largest number of National Assembly seats in the 16 November 1988 elections and she was destined to become the prime minister, I was asked by Prem Kumar (the Indian Express editor of the Chandigarh edition) to do a piece on her and on her visit to Shimla in 1972. (Later, she took over as the first woman prime minister of one of the world’s largest Muslim countries on 2 December 1988. She remained in power till 6 August 1990.)

My article, ‘The First Step’, appeared in the newspaper on 18 November 1988:

No one who saw the tall and lean girl on The Mall in Shimla or at the Chandigarh airport in June 1972 could have imagined that, one day, she would emerge as the most popular leader of the largest democratic party of Pakistan.

Benazir Bhutto was then only 19. In her junior year at Harvard and on summer vacation, she was visiting India with her father Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who was heading the Pakistani delegation for the summit meeting with Indira Gandhi after Pakistan’s defeat in the Bangladesh war.

Even in her hour of glory, Benazir will find it difficult to erase from her memory the ‘warm and welcoming streets’ of Shimla and the affection the town’s residents showered on her. Her five-day stay in Shimla not only proved to be her first lesson in international politics but also convinced her about the close bonds between the people of India and Pakistan even after the partition.

During her stay in Shimla, the girl in shalwar kameez was virtually the craze for its residents. Whenever she ventured out of the Himachal Bhavan, where she was staying, large crowds would gather on the roads to see her. Sometimes, the crowds would be so large that the traffic had to be stopped. The authorities often found it difficult to keep the crowds away from the shops Benazir would visit during her stay. Though she did not wear any jewellery, she carried with her to Pakistan pieces of imitation jewellery and handicrafts bought from some well-known shops of the city.

At the summit, talks were held in secrecy. Benazir became the focus of media attention. But journalists did not have easy access to her. She refused interviews. Her attitude, however, did not dishearten the enterprising journalists. Razia Ismail, an Indian Express reporter, made several attempts to get in touch with her but failed. But then she had an idea. She rang up the Himachal Bhavan PBX exchange and told the operator her name without disclosing her professional identity. The operator thought her to be a friend of Benazir. When she came on the line, Razia disclosed her professional identity and sought an interview. Benazir put the receiver down saying that ‘papa does not like it’. This was enough to make a readable story the next day!

Though she remained in the limelight from 28 June to 2 July 1972 – the days the Pakistani delegation was in Shimla – Benazir often found it a ticklish task to conduct herself in public in view of the sensitive nature of her father’s mission. In her own words: ‘My father advised me: Everyone will be looking for signs of how the meetings are progressing, so be extra careful. You must not smile and give the impression you are enjoying yourself while our soldiers are still in Indian prisoners of war camps. You must not look grim either which people can interpret as a sign of pessimism. They must have no reason to say: look at her face. The meetings are obviously a failure. The Pakistanis have lost their nerve. They have no chance of success and are going to make concessions.’ ‘So how should I look?’ I asked him. ‘I have already told you. Don’t look sad and don’t look happy,’ my father said. ‘That’s very difficult,’ I told him. ‘It is not difficult at all,’ he said. ‘For once he was wrong. It was very difficult to maintain a neutral stance of the face as we transferred to the helicopter at Chandigarh that was to take us to the hill station of Shimla …’

It was a totally different Benazir in the VIP room of the Chandigarh airport after the return here from Shimla of the Pakistani delegation on 3 July. Wearing jeans and a half shirt, she sat fully composed and listened to the conversation [Zulfikar Ali] Bhutto was having with B. N. Chakravorty and Bansi Lal, the then governor and the chief minister, respectively, of Haryana. For a while, she was the topic of discussion. Chakravorty and Bhutto knew each other as it was Chakravorty who had replied to Bhutto’s attack on India in the United Nations [in December 1971].

Bhutto told Chakravorty that when diplomatic relations between India and Pakistan were re-established, he would like his daughter to study in India. He asked about the institutions where she could be sent for study. Chakravorty named Jawaharlal Nehru University [in New Delhi], Delhi University and Sapru House [also in New Delhi] as the institutions where Benazir could seek admission.

But this was not to be. The 1977 military coup in Pakistan and the subsequent fast-paced developments resulting in the hanging of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto [on 4 April 1979] upset the plans of the father for his daughter.

When Benazir Bhutto became prime minister for the second time in October 1993, she failed to meet the commitments made by her father in the 1972 Simla Agreement and, in fact, adopted a belligerent attitude towards India. I now reproduce excerpts from my column (which was syndicated by the India Press Agency or IPA and published in a number of India’s English and vernacular dailies) that I wrote in late 1993 after my retirement from the Indian Express in 1991:

From her first lesson in diplomacy learnt on the Indian soil 21 years ago to a successful player in the big game of power politics, it has been a long journey for the Muslim world’s only woman prime minister Ms Benazir Bhutto.

India expects the new Pakistan premier to engage in purposeful discussions under Simla Agreement on Kashmir and other bilateral matters. But as the press reports suggest, Ms Bhutto, far from putting restraint on Pakistan’s bellicosity, is raising the Kashmir issue during the five-day summit of Commonwealth leaders which began in Limassol (Cyprus) on Friday [22 October 1993]. This would be in violation of a well-established convention of not raising bilateral issues at meetings of Commonwealth leaders …

Now when Ms Bhutto has again assumed the office of Pakistan’s prime ministership, the question arises: Will she seek a solution of the Kashmir ‘problem’ on the basis of and in the spirit of the Simla Agreement which her father signed and to which she was a witness? The question has assumed importance in view of the virtual rejection of the agreement and internationalization of the Kashmir issue by Pakistan.

Benazir Bhutto was, however, dismissed on 5 November 1996 after her coalition government became extremely unpopular because of the prevailing rampant corruption, which also involved her husband Asif Ali Zardari (who became Pakistan’s president in September 2008), who was arrested. (He was subsequently released in 2004.) Benazir decided to move to Dubai from Pakistan in 1998. She returned to Pakistan in October 2007, after having reached an understanding with President Pervez Musharraf with regard to dropping the corruption charges against her. Unexpectedly, Benazir Bhutto was assassinated on 27 December 2007 in Rawalpindi, a couple of weeks before the scheduled 2008 general elections, in which her party was expected to do fairly well.

***

Now let us get back to Bansi Lal. He sensed an opportunity to cash in on the favourable atmosphere created by the developments in 1971, particularly the Congress’ landslide victory in the Lok Sabha mid-term poll and India’s decisive win in the war with Pakistan. He decided to go in for a mid-term poll in Haryana as well, in which the Congress was to emerge as the winner.

Bansi Lal revealed his mind vis-à-vis the mid-term poll when V. D. Chopra, special correspondent of the Delhi-based newspaper Patriot and I (then representing National Herald) met him in his office at Chandigarh in the first week of February 1972. (Chopra later became the editor of Patriot.)

He disclosed that he had discussed the matter of going in for a mid-term poll with B. N. Chakravorty, the governor of Haryana. After the governor inquired whether he had obtained Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s nod for such a poll, he went to meet her and sought her approval by declaring in his characteristic manner: ‘Please allow me to tag Haryana Assembly’s gadda [cart] to your Lok Sabha aeroplane which has magnificently accomplished its flight [winning the Lok Sabha mid-term poll].’ Smiling at his earthy humour, Indira Gandhi gave her consent for a mid-term poll in Haryana.

Bansi Lal next informed us that he planned to hold a cabinet meeting the next day (with reference to the day on which Chopra and I had met him.) to recommend the dissolution of the Haryana Assembly. He did not want his plans (to seek the dissolution of the Assembly and holding of elections) to be leaked before the cabinet meeting as such a leakage could create serious problems for him within the ruling party.

But a reporter’s eagerness for a scoop like this compelled Chopra and me to request him not to treat the decision about the mid-term poll as ‘off-the-record’. He agreed but with a rider: ‘You can use the news but ensure that it is not displayed on newspapers’ “spot news boards” before it appears in your newspapers tomorrow morning.’ The commitment was honoured by both the National Herald and the Patriot.

The news (about the forthcoming mid-term poll) appearing as the main lead in the National Herald next morning created quite a stir in the Haryana political circles. The state cabinet met early in the morning and passed a resolution recommending dissolution of the Assembly. To avoid being pestered by journalists before meeting the governor, Bansi Lal took a circuitous route from the secretariat to reach the Haryana Raj Bhawan (the governor’s residence) to deliver the cabinet’s resolution to him. The governor then ordered the dissolution of the Assembly, which was followed by mid-term elections on 11 March 1972. The Congress returned to power with a handsome majority. Bansi Lal began his second term as chief minister on 14 March 1972.

***

Most Haryana leaders, who are known for their blunt style of conversation, however, become sweet-tongued when they would jovially narrate anecdotes about their encounters with important personalities. When in a relaxed mood, Bansi Lal would also recall fascinating incidents about his interactions with prominent public figures during his tenure as chief minister (1968–75). Among such figures was Harbans Singh, the chief justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court from 1970 to 1974.

As Bansi Lal observed (in late January 1971): ‘I never had any intention to quarrel with the chief justice. This was the [unwritten] understanding I and the chief justice had reached in our first meeting. But the chief justice wrote a nasty letter to the Punjab CM [Parkash Singh Badal] with a copy marked to the Haryana CM saying that proper protocol was not observed when the prime minister visited the airport on her way to inaugurate the Himachal state [on 25 January 1971]. The chief justice wrote that it was a private function and that in future he should not be invited on such functions.’

This letter evoked a strong response from Bansi Lal. He affirmed: ‘In my reply, I put the chief justice in his proper place.’ His reply resulted in another challenging letter from the chief justice deploring the tone of Bansi Lal’s letter. The CJ also pointed out that he had written to the Punjab CM and had not expected any reply from the Haryana CM. In response, Bansi Lal queried: ‘Then why had you addressed a copy of the letter to me?’ In protocol, according to Bansi Lal, the chief justice ranked fourth (after the president, the prime minister and the chief minister of a state).

The chief justice then replied to Bansi Lal, asking him to consider the matter as closed. Bansi Lal sent the copies of all the correspondence to the PM.

Bansi Lal often told the Congress Working Committee (CWC) and the prime minister (in a lighter vein) that he was ‘illiterate’ and could not contribute much to solving the problems faced by the party. What made him make the comment was the item in the Congress manifesto explaining that the party was not against the right to property. Indira Gandhi responded saying ‘I want to have the opinion of one who belongs to the majority of the people in the country [who were illiterate]!’

Ruling politicians occupying high offices try to hide the nature of their ailments to the extent possible as such a revelation would make them vulnerable to attacks by their opponents and sometimes even leading to revolt within their own party. This was the main reason for the straining of relations between Bansi Lal and his protégé, Bhajan Lal, the agriculture minister in the Haryana Government. (As mentioned earlier, Bhajan Lal went on to become the chief minister of Haryana in June 1979.)

As he was suffering from severe stomach ache and had also been afflicted by a mild paralytic attack, Bansi Lal was undergoing treatment at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (popularly known as the PGI), Chandigarh, in early 1974. He became very apprehensive about the seriousness of his ailment as he thought that he was in the grip of cancer. But medical tests disclosed that his apprehensions were baseless.

When Bansi Lal was convalescing at the PGI, Bhajan Lal and K. L. Poswal, the state home minister, started toying with the idea of succeeding him as chief minister. (Bansi Lal came to know about such a move.) After he was discharged from hospital, Bansi Lal started looking for opportunities to hit back at Bhajan Lal and Poswal. The chief minister severely reprimanded them for what he considered their lapses.

***

Bhajan Lal’s career was a chequered one. Born on 6 October 1930 at Koranwali, Bahawalpur district (now in Pakistan) in a Bishnoi community, Bhajan Lal had a humble beginning. He started his political career by becoming a member of the Adampur Gram Panchayat. (Adampur is part of the Hisar district in Haryana.)

Although there are conflicting reports about his vocation, some claimed that he used to go to different places on his bicycle to sell garments. I, however, know that he was a vendor of desi (pure) ghee. He used to regularly visit my native city Ludhiana to sell his product. He would set up his base in Dharam Pal Garg’s shop located in Mandi Kesar Ganj, just across the road from my house. Garg, with whom I had very good personal relations, was the son-in-law of the Haryana Congress MLA (the late Kishori Lal) and was president of the Punjab Foodgrains Dealers’ Association.

Nobody really knew about Bhajan Lal’s educational qualifications. But once he claimed to be an ‘intermediate’ (eleventh class pass). In a speech in the State Assembly, he, however, said he was a ‘PhD in politics’. He had three stints as chief minister of Haryana: 29 June 1979 to 22 January 1980 (Janata Party); 22 January 1980 to 5 July 1985 (Congress); and 23 July 1991 to 9 May 1996 (Congress). He also served as Union minister for agriculture and environment and forests in the Rajiv Gandhi-led Congress Government (1984–89).

Bhajan Lal owed his political clout to his popular base among Haryana’s non-Jats. He also won the Lok Sabha elections from Hisar in 2009.

Bhajan Lal was reputed for changing his political loyalties at the drop of a hat. He had left Congress to first join Jagjivan Ram’s party.1 He later revolted against the Janata Party chief minister of Haryana, Devi Lal, who had occupied that post on 28 June 1977. Bhajan Lal replaced Devi Lal on 29 June 1979, while still in the Janata Party (which was in power at the Centre at that time). After Indira Gandhi’s triumphant return to power in January 1980, Bhajan Lal maintained Haryana’s reputation of being the pioneer of defection politics in India when, to retain power, he jumped on to the Congress bandwagon on 22 January 1980 converting his Janata Party ministry into a Congress ministry!

To his credit, Bhajan Lal had the knack of winning friends and influencing people. His most famous method of gaining proximity to influential people was by doing ‘lucrative favours’. The favourite among such favours was the allotment of plots out of the chief minister’s discretionary quota to a variety of big names, including politicians, judges, journalists and Central ministers.

***

Initially, I had a good rapport with Bhajan Lal. Nevertheless, I always used to cross-check whatever he told me as I often found that his versions about political happenings were plants or white lies. My relations with him later became strained. The main reason was the publication of one of my reports in the Indian Express (on the front page; I cannot recall the date) about Dr Sukhdev Singh’s (Bhajan Lal’s staunch loyalist MLA) threat to revolt for his non-induction in the state cabinet when it was expanded. After that, Bhajan Lal was deeply annoyed with me.

The day after my report was published, when I was waiting for a lift in the Punjab and Haryana Secretariat’s VIP section, Bhajan Lal happened to come there. Dr Sukhdev Singh and a couple of journalists were with him. As we entered the lift, Bhajan Lal complained that my story on Dr Sukhdev Singh’s resignation was ‘concocted and baseless’. I did not react to his comments. Later, we accompanied him to his fourth floor office. As we took our seats, Bhajan Lal made Dr Sukhdev Singh sit on a chair close to him. Before we journalists could ask him any question, he repeated his earlier charge that my news about Dr Sukhdev Singh’s resignation was baseless. He asserted: ‘Sukhdev Singh is my man. If I ask him to jump into the well, he would jump. Hence, there is no question of his revolting against me.’

I could not digest this retort. I told Bhajan Lal: ‘Chief Minister Sahib you and Sukhdev Singh very well know the truth about the resignation. It would be better if we did our own jobs.’ After that, I left the room.

As I was waiting for the lift, Sukhdev Singh rushed out of the CM’s room and came towards me. Touching my knees, he thanked me for saving him from embarrassment by not mentioning about having shown his letter of resignation to former senior minister Balwant Rai Tayal (with whom he wanted to share his hurt feelings) who was staying in the nearby MLA hostel. For the same reason, Sukhdev Singh had also met Mool Chand Jain, another senior Congress leader and a former Haryana finance minister, who was also staying in the same hostel.

I told him he should have had the courage to tell the chief minister not to question the credibility of my report first in the lift and then again in his office. It was my professional ethics that compelled me not to disclose the source of my information.

Although my walkout from Bhajan Lal’s meeting cost me one of my valuable news sources, Sukhdev Singh became one of my most reliable sources on the Haryana Congress’s internal politics.

In my weekly column Currents and Undercurrents (in the Indian Express), I used to criticize Bhajan Lal’s style of functioning and his politics of engineering defections. When he again took over as Haryana chief minister after the May 1982 State Assembly elections, his principal secretary sent a bunch of clippings of my column published in the Indian Express (along with a letter) to the newspaper’s proprietor Ramnath Goenka. In his letter, Bhajan Lal attributed certain motives to my criticism. A strong advocate of the freedom of the press, RNG disregarded Bhajan Lal’s complaint. Later, the beat of the Indian Express Chandigarh edition’s pro-RSS2 staffer who had been covering Haryana was changed. (The higher-ups in the Indian Express perhaps suspected that as my write-ups used to be critical of Bhajan Lal’s functioning, the pro-RSS journalist may have played a role in Bhajan Lal’s lodging of a complaint against me.)

After some weeks, Bhajan Lal invited media persons for breakfast at his residence. Taking me aside, he apologized to me and, in the presence of his principal secretary, asked me to forgive and forget what had happened in the past.

A few months later, I had an experience of Bhajan Lal’s ‘generosity’ when, one early morning (sometime in the mid-1990s), during his tenure as CM from 1991 to 1996, he rang up to thank me for my column published in the Punjab Kesari group’s newspapers, in which I had appreciated some of his decisions I thought were beneficial for the people of Haryana. He asked me not to hesitate to tell him if I wanted any ‘work to be done including allotment of a plot’. I thanked him, saying that I already owned a plot I had acquired as a member of the Chandigarh Journalists’ Housing Cooperative Society.

__________________

1 Jagjivan Ram (5 April 1908 to 6 July 1986), a veteran politician from Bihar, was a Union minister who had held several important portfolios in the Indira Gandhi Government (1966–77). He broke away from the Congress in February 1977 and set up his own party called the Congress for Democracy (CFD). He was the deputy prime minister of India from March 1977 to July 1979.

2 RSS stands for the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh, an organization known for its pro-Hindu stand.