Thomas Hardy – the third generation of his family to bear that name – was born in a remote house in the hamlet of Higher Bockhampton in rural Dorset, on 2 June 1840. His entry into the world was an inauspicious one, and his life almost ended even before it had properly begun, for the infant Thomas was ‘thrown aside as dead’. ‘Dead! Stop a minute,’cried the monthly nurse (who attended the women of the district during their confinement). ‘He’s alive enough, sure!’ and she managed to revive the lifeless infant. Shortly afterwards, when he was sleeping in his cradle, his mother discovered ‘a large snake curled up upon his breast’ – which was also asleep. Because of its size, it may be deduced that this was probably a harmless grass snake rather than a poisonous adder, which is smaller.1 Thomas III, the subject of this book, was the firstborn of his family. The following year, 1841, his sister Mary arrived on the scene, but it would be another decade before brother Henry was born; to be followed by Katharine in 1856.
The Hardys firmly believed that they were descended from the more illustrious ‘le Hardy’ family of Jersey in the Channel Islands: John le Hardy having settled in Weymouth in the fifteenth century. They also believed that they were distantly related to Admiral Sir Thomas Masterman Hardy, who served under Horatio Nelson as flag captain of HMS Victory in the Battle of Trafalgar. (As yet, no documentary evidence has been produced to substantiate these claims.)2
Thomas III’s family, on both sides, were hardworking and creative people, but their lives were not without incident. His paternal great-grandfather, John Hardy (born 1755), came from the village of Puddletown, 2 miles north-east of Higher Bockhampton, and 5 miles north-east of Dorchester. A mason, and later a master mason and employer of labour, John married Jane Knight and the couple had two sons: Thomas I (born 1778) and John.
Thomas I carried on the family tradition by adopting the same occupation as his father. At the age of 21, he ‘somewhat improvidently married’ a Mary Head from Berkshire; a person who had known great hardship as a child through being orphaned.3
Thomas I and his wife Mary had six children, the oldest being Thomas II (born 1811). Under Thomas II the family business flourished with as many as fifteen men in its employ, including the ‘tranter’ who transported the materials to the building sites.
Hardy’s maternal grandmother, Elizabeth Swetman of Melbury Osmond – a hamlet in north-west Dorset situated on the boundary of Lord Ilchester’s estate – was descended from a family of landed yeomen. She was of a romantic disposition, had an excellent memory and could be relied upon by the parson to identify, in cases of doubt, any particular grave in the churchyard. Also, she was skilled in ministering to the sick of the locality; her authority being the English herbalist Nicholas Culpepper’s (1616–54) Herbal and Dispensary.
When Elizabeth met and secretly married a servant, one George Hand, so great was her father John’s disapproval of the match that he disinherited her. This was to have grave consequences; for soon after her father’s death, Elizabeth’s husband also died, whereupon she and her seven children were left destitute. One of these children, Jemima, born at No 1, Barton Close, Melbury Osmond, in 1813, was destined to become the mother of Thomas Hardy III.
Jemima was skilled at tambouring (embroidering) gloves and mantua (gown) making; she worked as a servant and cook in several Dorset houses, and also in London. In late 1836 she became cook to the Revd Edward Murray, vicar of Stinsford’s parish church of St Michael (Stinsford being a hamlet situated less than a mile from Higher Bockhampton). On 22 December 1839 Jemima married Thomas Hardy II at her mother’s family’s church of St Osmond, at Melbury Osmond.
When she married Thomas II, Jemima was already more than three months pregnant. In those days, however, conception before marriage was considered by the Dorset farm labourers (and even by the lower middle classes) to be nothing unusual. In fact, among such folk, a marriage did not normally proceed until the pregnancy had become obvious. There was a good reason for this: it was considered essential for a woman to prove her ability to bear children, who from an early age would be required to help support the family. In nineteenth-century Dorset, children as young as 8 years of age were commonly put to work in the fields.4
Even today it might prove difficult to negotiate one’s way through the host of labyrinthine lanes to Hardy’s former house, were it not for the fact that the route is adequately signposted. The house lies on the boundary of woodland and heathland, and may therefore be approached either from the woods or from the heath, or alternatively from a lane known as Cherry Alley. In Hardy’s time, Cherry Alley contained seven other houses, each one occupied by a person of some standing in the community. These occupants included ‘two retired military officers, one old navy lieutenant, a small farmer [presumably it was his farm which was small, rather than he himself] and tranter, a relieving officer and registrar, and an old militiaman, whose wife was the monthly nurse that assisted Thomas Hardy III into the world’.5
The Bockhampton house was a two-storey building with a thatched roof. It had been built in 1800–01 by Thomas III’s great-grandfather, John, for his son Thomas I and his wife Mary on land leased from the Kingston Maurward Estate. (In those days, a man with sufficient means could erect a dwelling for himself, or for a relative, and be thereafter permitted to live there for his lifetime; such a person being called a ‘livier’). Also included with the property were two gardens (one part orchard), a horse paddock, sand and gravel pits, and ‘like buildings’.6
The entrance to the house was through a porch leading directly into the kitchen, which had a deeply recessed fireplace on its south wall. Adjacent to this was the parlour, and then a small office where the three generations of Hardys – who were stonemasons-cum-builders – did their accounts and kept their money. Their workmen were handed their wages through a tiny barred window which was little more than a foot square and situated at the rear. From the office, an open staircase led up to the first floor which had two bedrooms. These upstairs rooms, being built into the eaves, had sloping ceilings and it was in the main bedroom situated above the office, that Thomas III was born.
The house had a chimney at each end and was thatched with wheat straw. The walls were made of cob (a composition of clay and straw), with a brick-facing at the front. The ground floor was paved with Portland-stone flagstones; the first floor with floorboards of chestnut 7in wide. Candles were used for lighting, as was usual in those times.
At some later date a self-contained bedroom and kitchen were added, the materials used being of inferior quality to those used in the construction of the original dwelling. It is likely that this extension was built some time around 1837 in order to provide accommodation for Thomas III’s grandmother, Mary Hardy (née Head), who in that year had been left a widow. (This would explain why Mary appears in the 1851 census as living in the parish of Stinsford, of which Higher Bockhampton was a part.) Later still, perhaps after Mary’s own death in 1857, the two buildings were conjoined.
Adjacent to the Hardy house was Thorncombe Wood, where swallet holes are to be found, together with a natural water feature, Rushy Pond. The wood is bisected by the Roman road linking Dorchester (Durnovaria, 2 miles distant) with London (Londinium) via Badbury Rings and Salisbury (Old Sarum), and also by an iron fence dating from the Victorian era and marking the boundary between two estates. On the periphery of the wood, on the south side, lies the hazel coppice; this species of tree being specifically grown for hurdle-making. Beyond the wood, the River Frome meanders through a fertile valley, with the distant ridge of the Purbeck Hills in the background. Ten miles to the south lies the town of Weymouth. Behind the house there extends a huge area of heathland, which in Thomas III’s time was dotted with isolated cottages. This was subsequently given the name ‘Egdon Heath’ by Hardy.
This was the landscape which Thomas III came to know in intimate detail, and also to love. It imprinted itself indelibly on his mind, and through him it would one day become familiar to people in all parts of the world, even though the vast majority of them had never seen it at first hand. During his lifetime, Hardy would live for a period outside of Dorset, but his beloved home county would never be far from his thoughts.
One of Thomas III’s favourite occupations was to lie on his back in the sun, cover his face with his straw hat and think ‘how useless he was’. He decided, based on his ‘experiences of the world so far … [that] he did not wish to grow up … to be a man, or to possess things, but to remain as he was, in the same spot, and to know no more people than he already knew’ – which was about half a dozen.7 In other words, he was perfectly happy and content.
At other times he would ‘go alone into the woods or on [to] the heath … with a telescope [and] stay peering into the distance by the half-hour …’ or in hot weather, lie ‘on a bank of thyme or camomile with the grasshoppers leaping over him’.8 When one cold winter’s day he discovered the body of a fieldfare in the garden, and picked it up and found it to be ‘as light as a feather’ and ‘all skin and bone’, The memory remained to haunt him. The death of this small bird revealed not only Hardy’s love of animals, but also his understanding of the frailty of life itself.9
Thomas Hardy III was born into a musical family and he himself developed a love of music and musicianship which remained with him all his life. His grandfather, Thomas I, in his early years at Puddletown, played the bass viol (cello) in the string choir of the village’s church of St Mary. He also assisted other choirs at a time when church music was traditionally produced by musicians occupying the raised ‘minstrels’ gallery’ at the end of the nave. Having married Mary Head, he moved into the house at Bockhampton, provided for him by his father. From that time onwards he attended the local thirteenth-century parish church of St Michael, situated a mile or so away at Stinsford, where he commenced as a chorister. He was also much in demand to perform at ‘weddings, christenings, and other feasts’.10
Thomas I was dismayed, on attending Stinsford Church, that the music there was provided not, as was the case at Puddletown, by a group of ‘minstrels’, but by ‘a solitary old man with an oboe’.11 With the help of its vicar, the Revd William Floyer, he therefore set about remedying the situation by gathering some like-minded instrumentalists together to play at the church. And from the year 1801, when he was aged 23, until his death in 1837, Thomas I himself conducted the church choir and played his bass viol at two services every Sunday.
At Christmastime there were further duties for the members of Stinsford’s church choir to perform, including the onerous task of making copies of those carols which had been selected to be played. On Christmas Eve it was the custom for the choir, composed of ‘mainly poor men and hungry’, to play at various houses in the parish, then return to the Hardys’ house at Bockhampton for supper, only to set out again at midnight to play at yet more houses.12
After his death in 1822, the Revd Floyer was succeeded by the Revd Edward Murray, who was himself an ‘ardent musician’ and violin player. Murray chose to live at Stinsford House instead of at the rectory, and here, Thomas Hardy I and his sons, Thomas II and James, together with their brother-in-law James Dart, practised their music with Murray on two or three occasions per week. Practice sessions were also held at the Hardys’ house. As mentioned, in late 1836, fourteen years after the arrival of the Revd Murray at Stinsford, Jemima Hand became Murray’s cook, and this is how she came to meet her husband-to-be Thomas Hardy II.
Thomas II is described as being devoted to sacred music as well as to the ‘mundane’, that is ‘country dance, hornpipe, and … waltz’. As for his wife Jemima, she loved to sing the songs of the times, including Isle of Beauty, Gaily the Troubadour, and so forth.13 However, although the family possessed a pianoforte and the children practised on it, she herself did not play.
A diagram was subsequently drawn by Thomas III, with the help of his father, of the relative positions occupied by the singers and musicians of the Stinsford church choir in its gallery in about the year 1835, five years prior to Thomas III's birth. At the rear were singers (‘counter’ – high alto), together with James Dart (counter violin). The middle row consisted of singers (tenor), Thomas Hardy II (tenor violin), James Hardy (treble violin) and singers (treble). In the front row were singers (bass), Thomas Hardy I (bass viol) and singers (treble). Finally, at the rear there were more singers, stationed beneath the arch of the church’s tower.14
What of the young Thomas Hardy III? He would never have the pleasure of meeting his grandfather and namesake, Thomas I, who died in 1837 – three years before he himself was born. Nevertheless, he inherited the family gift for making music and was said to be able to tune a violin from the time that he was ‘barely breeched’.15
When he was aged 4, Thomas III’s father gave him a toy concertina inscribed with his name and the date. Thomas III was said to have an ‘ecstatic temperament’ and music could have a profound effect on him. For example, of the numerous dance tunes played by his father of an evening, and ‘to which the boy danced a “pas seul” in the middle of the room’, there were always ‘three or four that always moved the child to tears’. They were Enrico, The Fairy Dance, Miss Macleod of Ayr and My Fancy Lad. Thomas III would later confess that ‘he danced on at these times to conceal his weeping’, and the fact that he was overcome by emotion in this way reveals just what an immensely sensitive and emotional person he was.16
As Thomas III grew older he learned, under the instruction of his father, to play the violin and soon, like his forefathers before him, was much in demand on this account. He always referred to the instrument as a ‘fiddle’, and to those who played it as ‘fiddlers’.17 It was the rule, laid down by his mother, that he must not accept any payment for his services. Nonetheless, he did on one occasion succumb to temptation, and with the ‘hatful of pennies’ collected, he purchased a volume entitled The Boys’ Own Book, of which his mother Jemima disapproved, since it was mainly devoted to the light-hearted subject of games.
Hardy’s maternal grandmother, Elizabeth Hand, was well-read and the possessor of her own library of thirty or so books (which was unusual for one who occupied a relatively low station in life). She was familiar with the writings of Joseph Addison, Sir Richard Steele, and others of the so-called ‘Spectator group’ (those who contributed to the Spectator magazine, founded in 1828): also with John Milton, Samuel Richardson and John Bunyan. The ten volumes of Henry Fielding’s works which she possessed would one day pass to her grandson, Thomas Hardy III.18
Elizabeth’s daughter, Jemima, inherited her mother’s love of books, together with a desire to read every one that she could lay her hands on. Under Jemima’s influence, therefore, it seemed inevitable that her own offspring, including the young Thomas III, would follow in her footsteps. And there were others, including Thomas III’s godfather, Mr King,19 who encouraged the boy in his reading; for example, by presenting him with a volume entitled The Rites and Worship of the Jews by Elise Giles, even though he had not, as yet, attained the age of 8.20 In fact, according to his sister Katharine, Thomas III had been able to read since the age of 3, and on Sundays, when the weather was considered too wet for him to attend church, it was his habit to don a tablecloth and read Morning Prayer while standing on a chair, and recite ‘a patchwork of sentences normally used by the vicar’.
Thomas III was considered by his parents to be a delicate child, and for this reason he was not sent to school until he was aged 8 (instead of 5, which was the normal practice). And so it was not until the year 1848 that he arrived at school for his first day of lessons. He was early, and he subsequently recalled awaiting, ‘tremulous and alone’, the arrival of the schoolmaster, the schoolmistress and his fellow pupils.
The Bockhampton National School, which had been newly opened in that same year, was situated a mile or so from his house, beside the lane which led from Higher to Lower Bockhampton. The school was the brainchild of Julia Augusta Martin, who, together with her husband Francis, owned the adjoining estate of Kingston Maurward. This they had purchased from the Pitt family three years earlier, in 1845. The couple inhabited the manor house, built in the early Georgian period, not to be confused with the estate’s other manor house nearby, which dated from mid-Tudor times. A benefactress of both Stinsford and Bockhampton, Julia had built and endowed the Bockhampton National School at her own expense; collaborating with the Revd Arthur Shirley (who in 1837 had succeeded the Revd Murray as vicar of Stinsford) on the project.
The Martins had no children of their own and Julia came to regard Thomas III as her surrogate child. In fact, she had singled him out as the object of her affection long before he had even started school. Passionately fond of ‘Tommy’, Julia was ‘accustomed to take [him] into her lap, and kiss [him] until he was quite a big child!’Thomas III, in turn, ‘was wont to make drawings of animals in water-colours for her, and to sing to her’. That he reciprocated Julia’s sentiments is borne out by his statement, made some years later, that she was ‘his earliest passion as a child’.21 One of Thomas III’s songs contained the words, ‘I’ve journeyed over many lands, I’ve sailed on every sea’,22 which would, no doubt, have amused Julia, who must have realised that Thomas III had never ventured beyond his native Dorset. It transpired, however, that the boy was shortly to widen his horizons when he and his mother Jemima paid a visit to her sister in Hertfordshire, and on the return journey caught the train from London’s Waterloo Station to Dorchester. This was Thomas III’s first experience of rail travel – the railway having come to Dorchester only as recently as the previous year, 1847.
At school, Thomas III excelled at arithmetic and geography, though his handwriting was said to be ‘indifferent’.23 Meanwhile, his mother encouraged him with the gift of John Dryden’s translation of Virgil, Dr Samuel Johnson’s Rasselas and a translation of St Pierre’s Paul and Virginia. A friend gave the young Thomas III the New Guide to the English Tongue by Thomas Dilworth24 and he also possessed A Concise History of Birds. Perhaps, however, his greatest joy was to discover, in a closet in his house, a magazine entitled A History of the (Napoleonic) Wars. 25 This would one day inspire him to write two books of his own, namely The Trumpet Major and The Dynasts.
When a year later, in 1849, Thomas III’s parents decided that their son should transfer to a day school in Dorchester, Julia Martin was offended, not only at the loss of her ‘especial protégé little Tommy’, but also because this new school was Nonconformist. This may have been a deliberate gesture of defiance by the Hardys who had developed a great antipathy towards Stinsford’s vicar, the Revd Shirley. This was because, as will shortly be seen, Shirley had been instrumental in destroying not only the fabric of their cherished medieval parish church of St Michael, but also its cherished tradition of providing live music for its congregation.
And so, at the age of 9, Thomas III commenced the second stage of his formal education, walking to and from his new school in Dorchester – a distance of 6 miles in total. Here he flourished, winning at the age of 14 his first prize: a book entitled Scenes and Adventures at Home and Abroad. 26 The headmaster, Isaac Last, was by repute ‘a good scholar and teacher of Latin’, but because this subject was not part of the normal curriculum, Thomas III’s father was obliged to pay extra for it. Nevertheless, his confidence in his son was amply rewarded when, in the following year, the boy was awarded Theodore Beza’s Latin Testament for his ‘progress in that tongue’.
Other authors with whom Thomas III was familiar were William Shakespeare, Walter Scott, Alexander Dumas, Harrison Ainsworth, James Grant and G.P.R. James.27 He also commenced French lessons, and at the age of 15 began to study German at home, using a periodical called The Popular Educator for the purpose. He was clearly a prodigious worker, and it is difficult to imagine that any other child in the county of Dorset (or anywhere else for that matter) was better read than he.
From whence did the impetus come that led Thomas III to drive himself so hard? From his father? Probably not, for Thomas III did not deny that the Dorset Hardys had ‘all the characteristics of an old family of spent social energies’, and it was the case that neither his father nor his grandfather had ever ‘cared to take advantage of the many worldly opportunities’ afforded them.28 Instead, the likelihood is that the drive came from his mother, the provider of books, who had insisted on him changing school in order to better himself; she, having experienced abject poverty as a child when her mother was left destitute, had no desire to see any child of hers in the same predicament.
Thomas III’s move to Dorchester was not without its repercussions. So annoyed was Julia Martin at having her protégé removed from her own school, that she forthwith deprived the boy’s father of all future building contracts connected with her Kingston Maurward Estate. Fortunately, Thomas II was able to obtain such contracts elsewhere, such as one for the renovation of Woodsford Castle – owned by the Earl of Ilchester and situated 5 miles to the east of Dorchester, by the River Frome.
When Thomas III subsequently met with Julia Martin, on the occasion of a harvest supper, she reproached him with having deserted her. Whereupon he assured her that he had not done so and would never do so. It would be more than a decade before the two saw one another again; by which time the Martins had sold their Kingston Maurward Estate and moved to London.
When he was aged 16, Thomas III composed a poem about his home entitled Domicilium, which reads as follows:
It faces west and round the back and sides
High beeches, bending, hang a veil of boughs,
And sweep against the roof. Wild honeysucks
Climb on the walls, and seem to sprout a wish
(If we may fancy wish of trees and plants)
To overtop the apple trees hard by.
Red roses, lilacs, variegated box
Are there in plenty, and such hardy flowers
As flourish best untrained. Adjoining these
Are herbs and esculents, and farther still
A field; then cottages with trees, and last
The distant hills and sky.
Behind, the scene is wilder. Heath and furze
Are everything that seems to grow and thrive
Upon the uneven ground. A stunted thorn
Stands here and there, indeed; and from a pit
An oak uprises, springing from a seed
Dropped by some bird a hundred years ago.
In days bygone –
Long gone – my father’s mother, who is now
Blest with the blest, would take me out to walk.
At such time I once inquired of her
How looked the spot when first she settled here.
The answer I remember. ‘Fifty years
Have passed since then, my child, and change has marked
The face of all things. Yonder garden plots
And orchards were uncultivated slopes
O’ergrown with bramble bushes, furze and thorn:
That road a narrow path shut in by ferns,
Which, almost trees, obscured the passer-by.
‘Our house stood quite alone, and those tall firs
And beeches were not planted. Snakes and efts29
Swarmed in the summer days, and nightly bats
Would fly about our bedroom. Heathcroppers
Lived on the hills, and were our only friends;
So wild it was when first we settled here.’
The poem is quoted in full, and for two reasons. Firstly, because it would be presumptuous of any person to believe that he or she was capable of describing the Hardys’ house better than Thomas III himself; and secondly, because it sheds important light upon his character.
From the poem it is clear that Thomas III possessed an excellent vocabulary, and was capable of writing with both style and fluency. He is poetical and knows how to make his words chime pleasantly with each other. He senses how, with the passing of time, everything changes. He also has a vivid imagination, where he sees the honeysuckle (‘honeysucks’) as having a will of its own, as it reaches upwards towards the sky. On a practical level, he has an extensive knowledge of local flora and fauna.
Surely Thomas III’s poem, Domicilium, is an indicator of the direction which his future life will take.