‘So fill me in then,’ requested Milton.
‘As I told you before, between mainstream, fringe, and splinter groups, there are probably a couple of dozen,’ said Paul Jarrett. ‘Though I can’t say we’re really experts on them yet. It’s only recently we began to realize that some of them really are terrorists. They fall more or less into four groups. First, what you might call Establishment animal protectors: the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals, the League Against Cruel Sports, and so on. They write letters to MPs, pass resolutions, send out press statements and try to win arguments.’
Milton scribbled a few words. ‘OK. Next.’
‘Groups like Compassion in World Farming which are ninety per cent full of nice, decent people, concerned about cruelty to animals, whether it be battery farming or transporting animals in inhumane conditions to be slaughtered cruelly abroad. They got strongly involved in the hunting issue in recent months because of the barrage of one-sided propaganda. Groups in this category believe in peaceful protest, but increasingly they’ve been infiltrated by members of the third group—animal rights people—who to say the least have a pretty loose definition of the word “peaceful”. Some of them want straightforward civil disobedience, and others—like the sabs—actively encourage violence.’
Milton nodded. ‘With you so far.’
‘Now to confuse the issue, what you might call categories B and C have also been infiltrated by Trotskyites—members of the Socialist Workers’ Party and others less well known and even more sinister. The Trots don’t give a tuppenny fuck for animals; their agenda is simply to foment discord wherever it arises. Poll-tax riots, motorway protests, nationalist street protests in Derry, demonstrations against cuts in the NHS—and now animal issues—it’s all the same to them. All they want is to take the peace out of peaceful and try to get us to overreact and injure members of the public. So they shout and scream and throw things and by fanning flames and encouraging a riot here and there hope to undermine our democracy.’
‘Are they potential murderers?’
‘Doubt it. Not most of them, anyway. Though not everyone would agree with me. But the fourth group certainly are. They’re the terrorists who send letter bombs, plant the odd car bomb, and are so fanatical I believe them capable of anything. Because they’re undercover we don’t know much about them. We think Jerry Dolamore is their public face.’
‘You mean you think he’s in favour of murder?’
‘I think so. But I can’t prove it.’
‘What about the peaceful fruitcakes like Brother Francis? Hasn’t he got some organization called something like “Bunnies for Jesus”?’
Jarrett grinned. ‘Not quite. But he calls the manor house he inherited from his father the Sanctuary; it’s a kind of retreat for animals and animal activists. Dolamore’s been there a lot.’
‘Do you think they’re in cahoots?’
‘Definitely. Though I don’t know who is the leader and who the led. At the moment we’re dredging up information on Dolamore and we’d be grateful if you’d do the same on Brother Francis. He has to be a suspect since he’s such a fanatic. And he could have fired the stun-gun. Contrary to Lords etiquette, he had left the chamber immediately after speaking and at the time of the murders, he was allegedly praying in his room. So what we really want to know is what he’s capable of, and you’re more likely to be able to find that out without attracting attention than we are.’
‘Sure. I’ll get to it straightaway. Talk to you tomorrow.’
***
‘When did he leave his order?’
‘Not long after he got the title, I gather, sir. About two years ago. Shall I get the clippings?’
‘Please, Ellis.’
The file was thick, but most of the contents were pretty repetitive. Milton glanced through some poems, but when he got to the lines
The lion’s tender with his cub
Gently licking and cuffing him in the scrub
he grimaced, and put the rest on one side.
Until very recently material about Brother Francis had been mainly confined to women’s magazines, with the occasional saccharine piece in a tabloid. ‘Saint Who Puts His Kitten First’ was a not atypical article, focusing as it did on how Brother Francis had spent an entire night sitting beside the sick bed of his kitten, Tiddles. ‘Millionaire Peer Gives His All To His Animals’ came when he announced on his father’s death that he would use all his material possessions for the good of animals and would not renounce the Purseglove title, since it would give him a platform from which to defend them. He would not, he explained to a reporter, sell up and give the proceeds to the recognized animal charities, for he felt that they were too much part of the Establishment. He wanted to harness the idealism of the young, so he had decided to set up a little commune of animals and their lovers in his family home.
In a profile in a particularly glutinous women’s magazine a few months later, there was much about Tiddles and Georgie and Becky and Bobbie, respectively cat, dog, hamster, and donkey, and how they and all the other little birdies and animals were in communion at Locksleigh Manor, along with those visitors who came for spiritual refreshment. Brother Francis was happy, but he admitted it had been a great wrench to leave the monastery where he had lived so happily for so many years. But he had had no option, for he knew the legacy to be a sign from God that he had been called to a special vocation. His abbot was quoted as confining his remarks to the press to a terse message on behalf of the community wishing their brother well.
Apart from reports of speeches at public meetings and in the Lords, the only other interesting piece was from a reporter who had recently enquired of inhabitants in his local village what they thought of their saintly lord. Attributed comments included, ‘proper gentleman’ and ‘holy man’; unattributed ranged from ‘potty’ and ‘barmy’ to—in an outbreak of rural wit—‘two brain cells short of a halfwit’. A few locals grumbled that the ban he had placed on hunting across his land had caused deep and bad feeling.
Milton sat and thought for a moment, then rang directory enquiries.
***
‘I came alone. I thought it might make it easier to talk.’
‘Ah, so you are looking to me, Chief Superintendent, to be indiscreet about my brother in Christ.’ The abbot giggled. Although their telephone conversation had led Milton to expect a friendly response, the friar’s sheer joviality took him aback. His features were as plump as Brother Francis’ were drawn, as rubicund as the other was colourless.
‘Well, fire away. What do you want to know?’
Milton put down his tea cup. ‘Is he capable of murder?’
‘If you’re asking me if I think Brother Francis might have been capable of devising such a sophisticated method of dispatching his ideological enemies and of then carrying it out, certainly not. As it was too painfully clear here, he is not what you would call a practical man.
‘The jobs he was capable of doing, other than writing his unspeakable poetry…You look surprised. Just because I’m a Franciscan doesn’t mean I’m daft. It is wretched poetry, which is an insult to human beings as well as to animals. I don’t want to be duly anthropomorphic, but if I were a tiger described as “gentle pussy of the jungle,” I would be inclined to hire a lawyer and sue for defamation.’
‘However, as I was saying, Brother Francis was so hopeless with his hands and so entirely without…’ He paused to search for the mot juste. ‘…Without a shred of common sense, that he was frankly an encumbrance.’ He tittered. ‘I can tell you that it is proof of our Christian charity that we didn’t end up murdering him ourselves. I mean, for a start, he couldn’t do gardening because he was obsessed about not killing insects. He couldn’t look after the hens because he disapproved of eating eggs. He was really a Buddhist, was Francis, masquerading as an Anglo-Catholic friar. So mainly we put him on cleaning duties, but he was so dozy that most of that was beyond him too. If there was anything to break, he’d break it.’
‘Nursing?’
‘The sick, you mean? Trouble there was that he was frankly irritating. When you’re sick, you want somebody calm, confident, and good with their hands, not somebody who’ll fret and drop things. So for most purposes, we left him to himself to do the best he could. Treated him essentially as our village idiot—a cross sent to us by God to test us.’ The abbot laughed. ‘Does that answer your question to your satisfaction?’
‘Yes. I can see he doesn’t appear cut out to be a criminal mastermind. But might he have helped?’
‘You mean is this funny colony of his a mask for taking arms against persecutors of animals?’
‘Yes. A violent cult, in other words.’
‘I believe that Brother Francis would be more upset at the death of a kitten or indeed a fox than of a human being. I often wondered why and came to the conclusion that the great attraction of animals was, shall we say, that they were uncritical. But that is not to say that he disliked people. No, by and large, he was a peaceable creature who would not wittingly do anyone any harm. Indeed, I would describe him where people are concerned as tender-hearted.’
‘But could he be brainwashed?’
‘He’s certainly weak-minded enough for that. But I stick to the belief that there is nothing violent in the man. I could see him throwing himself in front of horses and hounds to save the life of a fox and thus cause injury and death but only unintentionally. And you could, in any case, rely on him to launch himself at the wrong time and generally’—the abbot sighed rather wearily—‘once more demonstrate his capacity for messing everything up.’
He looked appraisingly at Milton. ‘You shouldn’t depend on my word alone. Why don’t you join us for dinner and talk to some of the others. Your driver would be most welcome too, though perhaps lest he inhibit conversation, it might be better for him to eat separately.’
***
‘All in all,’ reported Milton to Amiss when he rang him from home the next morning, ‘it was rather a jolly break in the proceedings.’
‘Are you joining up?’
‘I don’t think I’ll go to quite those lengths, but it’s been a revelation to me to find that friars can be fun.’
‘And they’re all of one mind?’
‘Absolutely. No one present ever saw Brother Francis harm his fellow man or beast except by accident. They’re glad to be rid of him, but to a man they’d be astounded if he ever committed or helped the commission of a violent act. They would not, however, be astounded if someone succeeded in pulling the wool over his eyes.’
‘So what does today hold?’
‘Getting the goods on Dolamore. Jarrett’s mob has a dossier.’
***
Jerry Dolamore, it emerged, was forty. Australian sources reported that he had left school in Perth with no qualifications at sixteen, drifting into a beach-based world where he’d proved to be short on athletic talent. He was sacked from a job as a lifeguard, moved to Sydney, and for a time dallied with the world of gay liberation. But he seemed to have been neither sufficiently attractive nor committed to be anything other than an also-ran in a world of bronzed and handsome young men.
In his late twenties, he had come to England, worked in bars in Earls Court, and for a time hung around with gay activists. Yet again he had been sidelined.
‘That,’ said Jarrett, ‘was when he seems to have decided to go in search of a new cause.’
Milton was puzzled. ‘What I can’t understand, bearing in mind all I’ve heard about his oratorical talents, is why he got nowhere in the gay movement.’
‘Because gays don’t want to be led by fanatical demagogues. For the most part, they make their case through the use of economic power, the courts, and lobbying. Few of them have a penchant for standing in great halls shouting “Sieg Heil”. Besides, at that stage Dolamore had no idea how effective he was as a public speaker. He appears to have drifted into the animal-activist business when he went to a public meeting out of curiosity and made a spontaneous speech which went down a treat. Within six months he was recognized as a great rabble-rouser and—like orators often do—having started by saying what would please an audience, he came to believe it himself and so entered a vicious spiral of extremism.
‘My guess is that what he actually thinks about animals is as unclear to him as it is to us. No one in Australia ever remembers him passing an opinion on animals, and in that land of huge steaks and barbecues, being a vegetarian—let alone a vegan—would have been a cause for considerable comment. No, I think the truth is that Dolamore was desperate for attention and possibly power and therefore took up the most promising cause.’
‘And do you think he would use violence?’
‘Only to increase his power. But I have to admit, it’s hard to see how these murders could help since he couldn’t claim the credit publicly without ending up in the clink.’
‘So where does that get us?’
‘Fucked if I know. But we’re putting the fear of God into some of those around him at the moment. So watch this space.’