Chapter 13
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS
Hedge Funds, Funds of Funds, and Other Alternative Investments
Beyond the world of mutual funds, there exists a parallel world of so called “alternative investments.” These include hedge funds, funds of funds, and other alternative products.
Hedge Funds
Hedge funds are usually structured as private investment partnerships that (as of April 2009) are exempt from many SEC regulations (as long as they abide by the rules and stay within the safe harbor). This appears likely to change as a result of the financial crisis of 2008.
From a U.S. perspective, there are two classes of hedge funds: onshore funds, which are located domestically, and offshore funds, which are domiciled outside of the United States. Safe harbor refers to limitations that investment companies must abide by in order to be exempt from most SEC regulation. These include restrictions on publicity and strict guidelines about the number and kind of investors they accept.
Hedge Funds or Hedged Funds? A Tangle of Terminology
The term hedge fund comes from the early use of these funds for hedging against a downturn in the markets by engaging in short sales. Today, paradoxically, many hedge funds do not engage in any hedging, but the term seems to be here to stay. Some advocate using the term hedged fund to describe the original type of fund; others have introduced absolute return fund to refer to the broader class of offshore and onshore hedge funds, allowing “hedge fund” to retain its original definition. Regulatory, technological, and economic changes have further confused the issue by blurring the distinction between hedge funds and the wider universe of mutual funds. For example, so-called 130/30 funds may be offered in a mutual fund format, even though they use some leverage and short-selling strategies traditionally associated with hedge funds.
short sale
Sale of securities not owned by the seller; used by investors anticipating a decline in the value of a security, or as a hedge.
Many domestic money managers offer both onshore and offshore hedge funds. The onshore fund is for sophisticated investors who, as U.S. nationals, are prohibited from investing in offshore funds. The offshore funds are for non-U.S. citizens (and tax-exempt domestic entities like pension funds, foundations, and endowments). The world of hedge funds is growing in importance. Over the last decade, it has become easier for accredited investors to find out about hedge funds.
Are You an Accredited Investor?
The lower threshold is liquid net worth of $1 million or income exceeding $200,000 for at least two consecutive years with the expectation that it will continue. There is also a new, more stringent requirement for funds that wish to accept more than the previous limit of 99 investors. These 3c-7 funds require a minimum net worth of $5 million.
Increasing numbers of accredited investors have decided that hedge funds offer benefits that mutual funds don’t. Fighting back against this trend, mutual funds have become a bit more like hedge funds, striving for more flexibility in their investment strategies to counter the perception that hedge funds are simply better investment vehicles. This trend was facilitated by the end of a longstanding restriction on mutual funds, the short-short rule, which formerly prohibited mutual fund managers from engaging in aggressive short-term trading strategies without worrying about endangering the fund’s pass-through tax status. Nonetheless, hedge funds remain far more flexible as investment vehicles, and this is unlikely to change soon. A note of caution: As the much-publicized 2007-2008 collapse of many prominent hedge funds showed, the freedom that hedge funds have with regard to investment strategies often magnifies risk as well as return.
Over the last decade, hedge funds increased in size and number as banks, mutual fund groups, and others launched hedge funds, trying to capture a piece of a very profitable business. In the case of mutual fund groups, these hedge funds frequently had investment objectives similar to those of their existing mutual funds. This raised the concern that managers might favor the hedge fund over the mutual fund when making investment decisions. Why would they? In addition to the 1 to 2 percent management fee, hedge fund managers typically also receive 20 percent of the profits of the hedge fund, as long as the fund is above its (or the investor’s) high-water mark. In contrast, mutual funds generally do not charge performance fees.
This more lucrative fee structure could create a financial incentive to favor the hedge fund in executing investment strategies. It should be noted, however, that hedge funds are typically far smaller than their mutual fund brethren, not only in terms of legal limitations on the number of investors, but also because of capacity constraints on the strategies employed by many hedge fund managers.
Additional information about hedge funds is available from a number of sources:
•
Alpha Magazine (212-224-3300,
www.iimagazine.com/alpha) is published by Institutional Investor (“II”). II publishes a wide range of specialty newsletters for institutional investors, in addition to
Alpha Magazine and its flagship publication,
Institutional Investor Magazine. While many of these publications cost over $1,000 per year, a wide variety of free information is available on their website.
www.iimagazine.com.
• The U.S. Offshore Funds Directory (212-371-5935,
www.hedgefundnews.com) is an annual publication providing information on more than 1,200 offshore funds. Cost: $695.
• Lipper TASS Hedge Fund Data. (
www.lipperweb.com) has data and research on hedge funds and related
alternative investments. The company has a New York office (877-955-4773). The database includes information on more than 7,000 actively reporting hedge funds and CTAs and over 6,000 funds and CTAs that have either closed, liquidated, or just stopped reporting. Information on funds that have stopped reporting is important because it helps mitigate the problem of selection bias which arises when funds with better records report more frequently than do funds with poor records.
alternative investment
Investments intended to help diversify a traditional stock/bond portfolio, such as real estate, hedge funds, or commodities.
A Taxonomy of Hedge Fund Investment Strategies
The Credit Suisse/Tremont Hedge Index divides hedge fund investment strategies into 10 broad categories:
Convertible Arbitrage
Dedicated Short-Bias
Emerging Markets
Equity Market Neutral
Event Driven
Fixed Income Arbitrage
Global Macro
Long/Short Equity
Managed Futures
Multi-Strategy
Funds of Hedge Funds
A fund of hedge funds (FoHF) is an alternative investment vehicle that invests in other alternatives, generally hedge funds. The basic rationale for this is asset allocation. A manager of a FoHF decides on the sectors or types of funds that are most appealing, assigns weightings to those sectors, and looks for the best fund managers within each sector.
asset allocation
Apportionment of a portfolio in various investment categories, especially stocks, bonds, cash.
Critics of the fund of funds concept point out that they generate fees on top of fees and expenses on top of expenses. If you want asset allocation, you can get it without the extra layer of fees and without the extra layer of mystery about what the underlying investments are. Besides, why stop there? Why not create “funds of funds of funds,” “funds of funds of funds of funds,” and so on ad infinitum?
Proponents respond that no single fund company can afford to hire the very best managers in all markets, whereas a fund of funds has the freedom to compile a portfolio of the best managers in the world. There are, however, at least two assumptions hiding in that argument—namely, that the fund of funds manager can identify the best managers and that the FoHF’s asset allocation will add value, not subtract it.
Other Alternatives
One of the biggest problems associated with hedge fund investing has been the lack of transparency into a fund’s positions, strategies, and risks. An extreme example that came to light in late 2008 is perhaps the greatest financial fraud of all time, perpetrated by Bernie Madoff, and apparently facilitated by numerous intermediaries—wittingly and/or unwittingly. While Madoff never operated a hedge fund, billions of dollars were raised by hedge fund and fund of fund managers who offered feeder funds, funds that apparently served no purpose other than to collect fees and send the money to Bernie. The secrecy that still exists in the hedge fund industry can have no greater illustration than the realization that many hedge fund managers had never even heard of Madoff or knew what a feeder fund was until he surrendered to authorities in December 2008.
The problem of lack of transparency has been tackled in two ways: by hedge fund managers offering full position-level transparency in separately managed accounts that are owned by the investor; and by financial engineers who have developed hedge fund replication strategies that are intended to offer hedge-fund-like returns and use sophisticated mathematical and computer techniques to reverse engineer hedge fund strategies, and to attempt to replicate the returns using liquid instruments, especially futures contracts. Both of these approaches are in an early stage of development, but they are garnering significant attention from investors who wish to retain the diversification benefits of alternatives without paying the price of lack of transparency, liquidity, and control.