Stretching from the foothills of the Alborz Mountains in the north to the edges of the Dasht-e Kavir desert in the south, Tehran was the largest city in the Middle East. The mountain range, with snowcapped Mount Damavand, the highest mountain in Iran, at its center, dominated the view. From the air the city looked as modern as a Western city, with broad paved avenues lined with trees. Mosques and minarets could be seen, and low white and brown buildings, many with green walled-in gardens. It had relatively modern hospitals, a university, museums, and a working telephone system. But Tehran was a study in contrasts. The streets were paved, but because the sidewalks were not, the air was dusty. The water supply was primitive. It came down from the mountains and ran in open streams alongside the principal streets. Because the streams were the city’s sole water supply, people had no choice but to use the water for washing as well as drinking: typhoid was rampant.
Under the circumstances the British, Russian, and U.S. embassies sent tank trucks up into the mountains to siphon water directly from mountain springs. Among the many precautions taken by the Russians during the conference was to change the procedure of accessing this water; each day their tank trucks went up into the mountains to unannounced destinations.
By 7:00 p.m. on Saturday, November 27, Harriman and Molotov were working on the conference schedule. It is of particular note that implicit in this first meeting was the assumption that Roosevelt’s wishes would be followed as to timing and discussion points. Harriman gave Molotov Roosevelt’s plan for the first day: Stalin to call on him at 3:00 p.m.; the first plenary session to commence at 4:00 p.m.; Stalin, Molotov, Churchill, Eden, the British ambassador, Archibald Clark Kerr, Hopkins, Harriman, plus the three interpreters to dine with him at 7:30 p.m.
Harriman then relayed to Molotov FDR’s conceptual outlook for the conference so that Stalin would be alerted. Roosevelt, said Harriman, “had not come with Churchill with fixed ideas, but was prepared to lay before the Marshal the various strategic plans…The principal question would be the influence of prompt action in the Mediterranean as against earlier or later OVERLORD.” Roosevelt’s message was clear: the cross-channel invasion was now within Stalin’s grasp—if he faced down Churchill. Harriman and Molotov parted.
Well past midnight Harriman and Clark Kerr received calls from Molotov asking them to come over to the Russian embassy immediately. When they arrived, Molotov announced that Soviet sources had just learned that there were German agents in Tehran who knew of Roosevelt’s presence, an assassination attempt was possible, the safest place for him under the circumstances was inside the Soviet compound. Driving through the city to visit each other was dangerous. Roosevelt, Molotov declared, should move.
His story was plausible. Several years earlier when the Iranian ruler had been Shah Reza, who was pro-Fascist and a great admirer of Hitler’s, there had been hundreds of German agents in Tehran, leading many to fear that Germany might assume control. To stop it from falling into Hitler’s hands, the Soviet Union and Great Britain had jointly invaded Iran, forced the shah to abdicate, and installed his twenty-one-year-old son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, on the throne. In the two-year interim, however, known suspicious Germans had been deported.
Molotov was firm on the necessity of Roosevelt’s moving to the Soviet embassy and continued to maintain the existence of a possible German assassination plan as the rationale for the late invitation. Quite possibly Stalin, finally taking charge of the situation upon arrival at the embassy, had ordered Molotov to invite Roosevelt to move in even if the quarters were not finished. Possibly to give the story additional authority, General Artikov, Mike Reilly’s opposite number in the NKVD, later told Reilly that thirty-eight German parachutists had been dropped on the outskirts of Tehran a few weeks earlier and that six were still at large.
After Molotov declared that Roosevelt should move, late though it was, he took Harriman and Clark Kerr on a tour of the proposed presidential quarters, which were in the central building in the compound, next to the conference room that would be used for the plenary sessions. The tour provided at least a partial answer to the question of why Molotov was just now extending an invitation for the president to stay at the embassy: the apartment was still not finished. Although it was well past midnight, workmen were in the bathroom finishing the installation of the bathtub. In fact, the delay in asking Roosevelt to stay at the embassy had to have been caused by the delay in finishing the rooms. But it little mattered whether the danger was real or imagined. Danger cleared the air for all concerned. Roosevelt was free to accept; not even his severest critics—the rabid right wing in America who thought he was a Communist sympathizer—would be able to fault his choice of residence.
The following morning, obviously delighted at the prospect, FDR announced he would move at 2:30 p.m. and that the U.S. Navy Filipino mess crew who cooked for him at Shangri-La, whom he had brought, would prepare his meals. As all foodstuffs consumed by the U.S. forces were shipped in, and nothing bought locally, the supply of food for the presidential party was not a problem.
Reilly, taking no chances, mindful of the NKVD report and the president’s safety, laid on protective measures for the president’s move to the embassy, which would be by limousine. Early in the afternoon he assembled a motorcade, with armed jeeps at the head and rear, stationed Secret Service men armed with tommy guns on the running boards of the president’s car, and lined the streets of the route with U.S. soldiers standing shoulder to shoulder. As the motorcade moved slowly, majestically past, the Iranians cheered. But inside the car sat a Secret Service agent posing as Roosevelt. After the motorcade was on its way, Reilly whisked FDR, Leahy, and Hopkins into an inconspicuous car. The car, preceded by a jeep, then went through backstreets to the Russian embassy at a brisk pace, arriving before the motorcade. “The Boss, as always, was vastly amused by the dummy cavalcade trip,” Reilly remembered. Chief of Staff Leahy and, of course, Hopkins moved in with the president.
Stalin stayed in one of the smaller houses in the parklike Russian compound; Molotov and Voroshilov stayed in yet another.
In moving into the embassy, Roosevelt would have been well aware that his rooms would be bugged by the Russians, that every word he said, every word said to him, would be overheard. But U.S. government personnel and Roosevelt himself had assumed for years that every important building, hotel, and embassy in the Soviet Union was bugged. In 1934, Roosevelt had sent William Bullitt, America’s first ambassador to the Soviet Union, with the following advice: “You will, of course, warn all the members of the staff of both Embassy and Consulate in Russia that they will be spied upon constantly.” In 1936 a man was discovered in the attic of Spaso House, the ambassador’s residence in Moscow, dangling a microphone over a spot roughly above Ambassador Joseph E. Davies’s desk. The film Mission to Moscow, which Davies had brought to Moscow in the spring of 1943 and shown to Stalin and the assembled Politburo, had in it a scene making fun of the ubiquitous bugging of diplomats by the Soviet government. Roosevelt would have assumed that everything he and his staff said was reported to Stalin, and he would have adjusted all conversation accordingly, even though there was no bugging equipment visible. Indeed, the microphones were so state-of-the-art small, the NKVD’s head, Lavrenti Beria, boasted, that it was “impossible” to spot them. Being such a good actor, the president probably enjoyed exercising his talents.
Stalin set great store in listening to the taped conversations, according to Beria, who briefed Stalin each morning at 8:00 as to what he had heard in the president’s quarters. Stalin “even went so far as to ask for details of the tone of the conversations: did he say that with conviction or without enthusiasm? How did Roosevelt react? Did he say that resolutely?…What do you think, do they know we are listening…? Roosevelt always expressed a high opinion of Stalin.” Stalin once remarked, seemingly puzzled, “They know that we can hear them and yet they speak openly!…It’s bizarre. They say everything, in fullest detail…I was able to establish from my eavesdropping that Roosevelt felt great respect and sympathy for Beria. Admiral Leahy tried several times to persuade him to be firmer with Beria. Every time he received the reply from Roosevelt: ‘That doesn’t matter. Do you think you can see further than I can? I am pursuing this policy because I think it is more advantageous. We are not going to pull the chestnuts out of the fire for the British.’ ”
Nothing underlines Stalin’s obsessive and thorough nature quite as clearly as his daily analysis of Roosevelt’s supposedly private words and attitudes. Nothing underlines Roosevelt’s ability to size people up correctly, and his talents as an actor, more than his pursuit of the invitation to stay in the Russian embassy and his conduct while there. Stalin learned only what Roosevelt wanted him to learn. Roosevelt would have been tickled pink to know that Stalin didn’t dream Roosevelt knew his conversations were being picked up by hidden microphones.
Roosevelt’s living arrangements brought out paranoia in the British. “Plainly it is convenient to him [Stalin] to have the President under his eye, where he cannot spend his time plotting with the British Prime Minister,” observed Churchill’s doctor, Lord Moran, voicing the general underestimation of Roosevelt’s intelligence that was endemic among the British at the conference.
Intimidatingly fit members of the NKVD wearing pistols took the place of servants in the president’s rooms. One look at the men who made their beds and cleaned their rooms made this clear. Remembered Reilly, “Everywhere you went you would see a brute of a man in a lackey’s white coat busily polishing immaculate glass or dusting dustless furniture. As their arms swung to dust or polish, the clear, cold outline of a Luger automatic could be seen on every hip.” Commander William Rigdon, assistant naval aide, left to wind up things after the presidential party had left, was startled to see that a number of the servants, shedding their white coats, were in reality Russian officers, with uniforms and insignia indicating ranks up to general. Brute Soviet soldiers were, in fact, everywhere. Two hundred soldiers armed with submachine guns ringed the embassy grounds. More soldiers, “all of them really big men[,] [n]othing under six feet two,” ringed Roosevelt’s particular building. There seemed to be a Soviet guard behind every tree in the park as well. The street between the Russian and the British embassies was turned into a passage by the placement of high walls from embassy to embassy. The Russian embassy park itself was surrounded by a stone wall. And each morning Lavrenti Beria, the collar of his overcoat turned up, his felt hat pulled down over his eyes, cruised the embassy park in a Buick with darkly tinted windows.
The president probably never felt safer. Discussing the living arrangements later, Roosevelt always left out that he had asked Stalin’s advice as to where he should stay. He told Frances Perkins a half-truth, that at no time did he believe there had been any plot. But he also told her that it was clear to him that Stalin wanted him at the Russian embassy, and, he went on, embroidering his story, the move distressed him because, to make it possible, Stalin had to move out to a small cottage on the embassy grounds.
No one, with the single exception of Hopkins, knew about Roosevelt’s original query to Stalin asking where he should live until years later when their full correspondence was published. Churchill would have been stunned if he had known. But Stalin knew, and Molotov, and that was the whole point. Roosevelt wanted Stalin to see the lengths he had gone to to lay the groundwork for their meeting. It was “a small thing to do to please them…If we could woo them in this way, perhaps it was the cheapest thing we could do…It was a matter of exhibiting my trust in them, my complete confidence in them. And it did please them, no question about it,” he said later to Perkins.
Roosevelt did it because he wanted Stalin to sign on to a full political agenda. There were the military considerations: he had to set a firm date for Overlord, the Allied invasion—the second front, as the Russians called it. And although Stalin had told Cordell Hull in Moscow in October that the Soviet Union would join America in the war against Japan, Roosevelt needed to hear such a commitment from Stalin’s lips. Soviet military plans had to be coordinated with Overlord.
But what was of supreme importance to Roosevelt was the endgame, the structure of the peace, and for that he needed Stalin’s full cooperation. Versailles—the horror and futility of that postwar peace conference—was always on his mind. Only at a conference of the victors, held while still fighting shoulder to shoulder, still in need of each other, did he feel he could shape the postwar world.
How many times did Roosevelt suggest a meeting to Stalin? Countless. By spring 1943, no nearer a meeting, FDR was beginning to feel really anxious: the tide of war was changing in favor of the Allies, and he still had no meeting scheduled. He decided to try new tactics. He proposed a meeting without Churchill because, as he told the Canadian prime minister, Mackenzie King, with whom he had been friends since Harvard, who was visiting the White House, “I have a hunch that Stalin does not want to see the two of us together, at least at the outset, and that he would like to talk with me alone.” FDR envisioned this meeting as taking place in Alaska, possibly in Nome, in August. He had it all worked out in his mind: he would meet up with Mackenzie King in Ottawa, the two of them would drive north on the Alcan Highway (FDR had ordered its construction in 1942, the Army Corps of Engineers had finished it against all odds eight months later; he was dying to see it), then he would continue alone to Alaska to meet Stalin.
King, who knew Churchill at least as well as FDR did, told FDR he foresaw no objection from the prime minister, because Churchill had been in Russia “and seen Stalin there.” But King was wrong—Churchill minded a great deal—and Roosevelt would later in June deny to Churchill that he had written to Stalin asking him for a private meeting. It had been Stalin’s idea, Roosevelt wrote: “I did not suggest to UJ that we meet alone but he told Davies that he assumed (a) that we would meet alone and (b) that he agreed that we should not bring staffs to what would be a preliminary meeting.”
To underline the importance of a meeting of just the two of them to Stalin, the president had Joseph E. Davies deliver his message in person. Davies, his good friend, who had established a good relationship with Stalin when he had been American ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1936 to 1938, arrived in Moscow in late May 1943.
In his letter Roosevelt demonstrated his fine geographic knowledge:
My Dear Mr. Stalin: I am sending this personal note to you by the hands of my old friend…It relates solely to one subject which I think it is easier for us to talk over through a mutual friend…I want to get away from the difficulties of large Staff conferences…Africa is almost out of the question in summer, and Khartoum is British territory, Iceland I do not like because for both you and me it involves rather difficult flights, and in addition would make it, quite frankly, difficult not to invite Prime Minister Churchill at the same time. Therefore I suggest we meet either on your side or our side of the Bering Straits.
Roosevelt hoped to cut through Stalin’s anger and disappointment at the lack of concrete plans for the second front, which he had led Molotov to believe was going to happen that summer.
Stalin accorded Davies a special welcome when he arrived in Moscow in 1943. He met with him for two and a half hours on May 20 and three days later threw him a formal dinner in the Kremlin. Virtually all of the Politburo were at the dinner, at the conclusion of which Mission to Moscow was shown. The movie, produced by Warner Brothers, based on Davies’s book of the same title, was essentially a Hollywood propaganda film designed to whip up sympathy for the hard-pressed Russians. It purported to give “the facts as I [Ambassador Davies] saw them.” The all-star cast featured Walter Huston, Roosevelt’s “favorite of favorites” actor, as Davies, Ann Harding as his wife, Marjorie Merriwether Post Davies, and Oskar Homolka as Maxim Litvinov. Other actors played Joseph Stalin, Winston Churchill, and the British foreign secretary Anthony Eden. The film was a great paean to Soviet courage, to Soviet grit, and to the heroic struggle by Soviet civilians and soldiers against the onslaught of the German army. The movie suggested that Soviet workers who fulfilled their factory quotas and were rewarded with extra rubles had a great deal in common with American workers. Collective farms were depicted as producing mountains of food. There were dramatic photographs of sabotaged Russian factories being blown up, as justification for the Moscow show trials of 1936–38. That was followed by a dramatization of a show trial during which high Soviet officials confessed to taking orders from the traitor Leon Trotsky, who, aided by the German government, was seeking to overthrow the Soviet government. The movie couldn’t have been more laudatory to the Soviet cause if it had been directed by the Kremlin.
When it was over, after the lights were turned on, after the clapping, everyone turned to see Stalin’s reaction. He looked quite stunned, remembered a British diplomat, who reported that at length he said, “Let’s all get a drink.” Pleasantly amazed as he must have been by the enthusiastic, simplistic portrayal, he decreed that it could be shown all over the Soviet Union. (It pleased him so much that in later years it became one of the films he most enjoyed watching.)
Davies thought Stalin had agreed to a meeting with FDR. “As to the particular mission I was engaged upon, I believe that the result thereof has been completely successful,” he advised Roosevelt. Stalin cabled FDR that he thought they could meet in July or August, saying he would give the president two weeks’ prior notice of the exact date: “I agree with you that such a meeting is necessary and that it should not be postponed.” But he also warned that “the summer months will be extremely serious for our Soviet armies.” Unusually, this message closed with Stalin’s writing, “With sincere respect.”
Then, on June 11, 1943, Stalin wrote to Roosevelt to tell him of his disappointment in learning that at the Trident Conference just concluded in Washington, “you and Mr. Churchill made the decision, postponing the British-American invasion of Western Europe until Spring of 1944…This decision creates exceptional difficulties for the Soviet Union.”
Roosevelt did not directly respond to this. Instead, he wrote that he was stepping up the shipments of aluminum that the Soviet Union so desperately needed, and “in addition to our new protocol agreement I have directed that six hundred additional fighters be sent to you during the balance of 1943…the most maneuverable fighter we have…I have also directed the shipment of seventy eight additional B-25s.”
Stalin sent another angry message regarding the postponement of the invasion to the president on June 24, in the form of relaying the message he had sent to Churchill:
You write to me that you fully understand my disappointment. I have to tell you that this is not simply [a] matter of disappointment of the Soviet Government, but a matter of preservation of its confidence in the Allies which confidence is subjected to hard trials.
One must not forget, that it is a question of preservation of millions of lives in occupied regions of Western Europe and Russia, and reduction of the tremendous sacrifices of the Soviet armies in comparison with which the sacrifices of the Anglo-American forces constitute a small quantity.
Two days later, however, certainly influenced by a laudatory message Roosevelt sent him on the second anniversary of Hitler’s invasion of the Soviet Union (which took two days to get to him), in which the president mentioned the “act of treachery,” the “history-making exploits of the armed forces of the Soviet Union,” the “almost incredible sacrifices which the Russian people are so heroically making,” and “approaching the challenging tasks of peace which victory will present to the world,” Stalin sent the president a friendly message that expressed his mind-set at the time, ascertainable because, unusually, he took the trouble to cross out the original “vrajeskiy” as describing the Germans and replace it with “zatvernik,” which translates as “brigands”:
I thank you for the high evaluation of the determination and courage of the Soviet people and of their armed forces in their struggle against the German brigands.
As a result of the two-year struggle of the Soviet Union against Hitlerite Germany and her vassals and as a result of the serious blows which have been delivered by the Allies to the Italian-German armies in North Africa the conditions for the final destruction of our common enemy have been created.
In July, Roosevelt impatiently reminded Stalin that he was still waiting for a firm meeting date. But the German counterattack that Stalin had been waiting for had finally begun. Hitler had amassed huge numbers of tanks and guns in preparation for a battle at Kursk, southwest of Moscow, counting on the German army’s winning a decisive victory there that would fire up the world. The battle involved four thousand planes, six thousand tanks, and more than two million soldiers. The Red Army fought the Germans to a standstill, then gradually pushed them back and overwhelmed them. By the fifth day the battle was finished; the Red Army was in control. It was a decisive time: the end of Hitler’s penetration of the Soviet Union. Almost immediately the Red Army regrouped and began marching, quickly retaking Orel and Belgorod, then advancing in force toward the Dnieper River and beyond.
On August 8, Stalin finally responded to Roosevelt’s message. He explained that he couldn’t take a long journey: “The battles are in full swing…the Soviet Armies repelled the July offensive, recaptured Orel and Belgorod and now is putting the further pressure upon the enemy…I…shall not be able, unfortunately, during this summer and autumn to keep my promise given to you through Mr. Davies.” Unless, he continued, Roosevelt came all the way to him: “Under the present military situation, it could be arranged either in Astrakhan or in Archangel.”
As to Roosevelt’s suggestion that they meet à deux, Stalin seemed to think it was a trick: “I do not have any objections to the presence of Mr. Churchill at this meeting, hoping you will not have any objections to this.” Although there was no way for Roosevelt to know it, Stalin had taken great care with this message; it is one of the few written in his own hand.
Roosevelt took this as a cue that Stalin wanted Churchill present, and his next two cables asking for a meeting were co-signed by Churchill. He followed these up with another on September 4 mentioning Churchill as the third conferee. “I personally could arrange to meet in a place as far as North Africa.” Finally, on September 8, Stalin agreed he could now take the time to meet, but he dismissed North Africa as a location: he would only travel as far as Iran.
Roosevelt didn’t want to go there with good reason. As he wrote to Stalin on October 14, Tehran presented a problem because the U.S. Constitution stipulated that “new laws and resolutions must be acted on by me after their receipt and must be returned to Congress physically before ten days have elapsed…. The possibility of delay in getting over the mountain—first, east bound and then west bound—is insurmountable.”
Stalin replied, “Unfortunately, not one of the places proposed instead of Tehran by you for the meeting is suitable for me.”
The end of October found Roosevelt as upset as he ever got because of Stalin’s insistence on Tehran. In a long, impassioned message, he pulled out all the stops, writing, “I would gladly go ten times the distance to meet you were it not for the fact that I must carry on a constitutional government more than one hundred and fifty years old…It would be regarded as a tragedy by future generations if you and I and Mr. Churchill failed today because of a few hundred miles…I repeat that I would gladly go to Tehran were I not prevented from doing so because of limitations over which I have no control…Please do not fail me in this crisis.”
His message was timed so that Hull, in Moscow for the conference of foreign ministers, could personally deliver it to Stalin. The strain of not knowing and keeping up appearances was telling on the president. He came down with the flu on October 19, running a temperature that went as high as 104 degrees for days.
On October 25, Hull, accompanied by Harriman, met with Stalin in the Kremlin, where Stalin had his office in the yellow palace, the stunning yellow and white palace built by Tsar Nicholas I along the Moscow River. They walked through the long green-carpeted corridors to Stalin’s large and simply furnished office on the second floor overlooking the river. The windows were lined with heavy drapes and the walls with Russian stoves, both testaments to the bitter cold of the Russian winters that Stalin felt so acutely. On the floor was a thick red carpet. Portraits of Lenin, Marx, and Engels stared down from the walls. In one corner in a glass case was a white death mask of Lenin.
As Hull and Harriman sat across the large conference table from Stalin in hard, uncomfortable chairs, Hull emphasized how important the still unscheduled meeting was to FDR. Stalin said that he was unable to understand why a delay of two days in the delivery of state papers should be so vital a matter as to preclude Roosevelt’s presence in Tehran, whereas a false step in military operations might cost tens of thousands of lives. Hull tried to explain, and while suspicious of Stalin’s sincerity he was at least reassured by Stalin’s remark that he was not against the meeting “in principle” and his further explanation that he had put off the meeting because he couldn’t miss the present opportunity to aid in the decisive defeat of the Germans, “an opportunity which might occur only once in fifty years.”
Three more days passed. Hearing nothing from Stalin, on October 28 Roosevelt cabled Hull that he should suggest to Stalin that he fly “as far as Basra even for one day,” that the rest of the time Molotov could sit in with Churchill and him. Hull cabled back that such an arrangement was “doubtful.” Another day passed with no meeting set up. Sufficiently recovered from the flu to hold a press conference, FDR found himself pressured by reporters about the Moscow Conference. One reporter asked, “You are now confident of Russia’s willingness to cooperate with us in maintaining peace?” Roosevelt answered, “I wouldn’t put it that way. I always have been personally. This confirms my belief.”
Q: “It has been confirmed—strengthened?”
ROOSEVELT: “Yes, yes.”
Later that day Roosevelt called his good friend Daisy Suckley, who was home in Rhinebeck, New York, and vented his frustration to her. “Things are ‘in a mess,’ ” he complained.
“I can’t ask questions over the phone,” she wrote in her diary, “He ‘expects’ to go on the Long Trip, ‘thinks’ it will go through, but it is not entirely certain, yet.”
Suckley, ten years younger than the president, was Roosevelt’s sixth cousin and his closest companion during the war years. Her important role in Roosevelt’s life is little known because it was only after she died in 1991 that her diary, thousands of pages long, her letters to the president, and thirty-eight handwritten letters to her from him were discovered in a suitcase under her bed. Her diary was published as Closest Companion, edited by Geoffrey Ward, in 1995. She had first laid eyes on Roosevelt at a New Year’s Eve ball when she was an impressionable eighteen and he twenty-eight. She never forgot the sight of him, she told a confidant, “tall and laughing as he whirled one partner after another around and around the dance floor.” He was the love of her life. She lived at Wilderstein, her family’s large but run-down five-story turreted Queen Anne Hudson River mansion that was upriver from Springwood, the Roosevelt compound in Hyde Park built by FDR’s father and rebuilt by him, which FDR considered his real home. She was smart, well-read, and thoughtful. At this point in the president’s life, she was probably his best friend. She spent more leisure time with him than anyone else. In addition, she was working with him, using her intimate knowledge of FDR’s life, to arrange the large photograph collection in his new presidential library, the first presidential library in the country, which he had built on the grounds of his Hyde Park estate and had given to the nation.
Suckley was slender, prim looking, always dressed in slightly old-fashioned clothes. Whether they ever had an affair is not known, although something happened one day when they were at Top Cottage, the president’s strictly private getaway cottage that he had designed and built on his property in Hyde Park. Whatever it was, it sufficed for Daisy, binding her to Roosevelt through thick and thin.
She managed to be the most nonthreatening of the women that the president surrounded himself with and was accepted resignedly by Eleanor, who told her friend and biographer Joseph P. Lash that Franklin’s eye had wandered from the very beginning—while they were on their honeymoon: “There always was a Martha for relaxation and for the non-ending pleasure of having an admiring audience for every breath.” Daisy gave Roosevelt Fala, the black Scottie that became famous after the president, responding to a Republican charge that he had wasted taxpayer dollars on transportation for Fala (which he showed was untrue), made the brilliant countercharge that, as low as it was to attack him, attacking a dog that couldn’t defend itself was beyond the pale: “His Scottish soul was furious. He has not been the same dog since.” He must have been half in love with her himself, for he kept her letters to him with him always, secreting them among the volumes of his stamp collection that traveled with him wherever he went.
Roosevelt arrived at Hyde Park on October 29 still unable to shake the flu, according to Daisy’s diary entry: “He is preparing for the Long Trip—Hopes he won’t have to go to Teheran, which is full of disease, and involves a flight over the mountains of up to 15,000 feet. He dreads both things for himself and his whole party.” The worst of it was that he still didn’t know if the meeting was even going to take place, as he wrote to Mackenzie King on November 1: “I still hope that we can see ‘Uncle Joe.’ Apparently, however, my constitutional problems weigh lightly with him though I have tried a dozen times to explain to him that while my Congress is in session I must be in a position to receive bills, act on them, and get them back to Congress physically within ten days.”
Another cable came from Stalin: “The possibility of traveling farther than Tehran is excluded. My colleagues in the Government consider…that my traveling beyond the borders of the USSR at the present time is impossible…I could be successfully substituted at this meeting by Mr. V. M. Molotov.”
That same day Roosevelt also received some good news: the Senate overwhelmingly, 85 to 5, passed a measure dear to his heart, the Connally resolution approving of the United Nations: “That the Senate recognizes the necessity of there being established at the earliest practicable date a general international organization, based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all peace-loving states, and open to membership by all such states, large and small, for the maintenance of international peace and security.” He had jumped the first hurdle—a hurdle Wilson had failed to clear: he had the backing of the legislative branch of government. The Senate would be behind him for his postwar organization for peace.
The next morning Roosevelt had breakfast with Sumner Welles, until very recently, as undersecretary of state, the second-ranking person in the State Department, who had headed the prewar State Department planning group working on the international peace organization. It was a warm gray November day, recalled Welles. Roosevelt was propped up in bed amid a pile of papers, a dark blue cape over his shoulders, smoking a cigarette through his long, uptilted ivory holder, the windows half-open in spite of air heavy with mist. They talked for two hours on the general nature of the organization that he would present to Stalin when they finally met. “We won’t get any strong international organization unless we can find the way by which the Soviet Union and the United States can work together to build it up as the years go by,” FDR told him. “That to him was the key issue,” Welles would write. Later in the morning the president set off for Shangri-La, taking along, for distraction, the Supreme Court justice William O. Douglas and his wife, Mr. and Mrs. Nelson Rockefeller—and Daisy.
The next afternoon, according to her diary, when Daisy walked onto the enclosed porch of the cottage, Roosevelt greeted her with his latest thoughts about Stalin, saying that because he was commander of the Russian forces he “cannot be away from Moscow beyond a certain number of hours…The P. suggested that Stalin may be suffering from an inferiority complex…It has to do with his ‘strategy’ toward the outside world—Russia is now so big, and so strong, that she can impose her will, and must be treated at least as an equal—this is such a change from, shall we say, ten years ago, that Stalin may be self conscious about it.”
It was never far from Roosevelt’s thoughts that the time to make postwar plans was before the fighting ended. He had a private fear that that might be sooner than anyone expected. “It was quite possible Germany might crumple up at any moment,” he had said to Mackenzie King the previous December, as Zhukov began tightening the noose around Stalingrad, explaining that he had been getting many reports from Germans “as to the shortage of food, as to the discontent of the people.” He had to get a meeting scheduled.
Observant Daisy noticed that his hands were shaking more than usual, which he attributed to drinking too much coffee, but his ankles were swollen, which he couldn’t explain away—even appearing, Daisy wrote, “a little worried about swelling in his ankles which comes when he is tired. Fox [Lieutenant Commander George Fox, the president’s physical therapist] rubs them before dinner and he puts an electric vibrator on them at bedtime.”
FDR had presented his travel problem to Attorney General Francis Biddle, a product, as he was, of Groton and Harvard, who solved it by writing up a memo emphasizing that wherever the president might be, he had ten days excepting Sundays, which were not counted, to return a bill to Congress from the time it had been presented to him. That problem solved, he decided to go. On Monday, FDR cabled a message to the U.S. embassy in Moscow for Harriman to deliver to Stalin. Stalin, however, was not available; Molotov received the message. Molotov told him that the premier had a light case of the flu and could not receive him, whereupon Harriman had the message translated for Molotov so that, as he explained, in case there were any questions, he could clarify them. “I have worked out a method so that if I get word that a bill requiring my veto has been passed by the Congress…I will fly to Tunis to meet it and then return,” wrote FDR. Roosevelt’s message continued, “It is my thought that the Staffs begin their work in Cairo on November 22, and I hope Mr. Molotov and your military representative, who I hope can speak English, will come there at that time.”
Molotov queried Harriman as to what was involved in the preliminary negotiations in Cairo, because he would be the Soviet representative. Harriman admitted he did not know, at which point Molotov frostily asked whether the president had taken note of Marshal Stalin’s comment in his November 5 cable that the marshal’s colleagues “consider it generally impossible for him to travel outside the borders of the USSR.” Harriman answered that he would inform the president about that but that the president “is assigning high priority to this meeting.”
THE CABLES BACK AND FORTH to Stalin and to Churchill as well had a huge effect on Stalin. No longer did the world hold him and his nation at arm’s length. Now, realizing that FDR and Churchill were treating him as an equal, he began concentrating on grooming the Soviet Union for its coming postwar status as a major world power. Even before Tehran he made systemic changes. The same weekend that the president was at Shangri-La with Daisy fretting about whether or not he would go to Tehran, Stalin was giving his annual Revolution Day peroration. For the first time he introduced a note of praise and accommodation for his allies: “The fighting in Southern Europe is not the Second Front, but, all the same, it is something like the Second Front…Naturally, only a real Second Front—which is now not so far away—will greatly speed up victory over Nazi Germany, consolidate still further the comradeship-in-arms of the Allied States.” He had admitted only the week before at the Moscow Conference that “the threat of a Second Front in Northern France had, in the summer of 1943, pinned down some twenty-five German divisions in the west.”
Stalin, a great student of history, particularly liked to think of himself as a ruler following in the steps of Ivan the Terrible, who had made Russia great. When the foreign minister of Lithuania had walked the halls of the Kremlin with him late one night in 1940, Stalin said to him, “Here Ivan the Terrible used to walk.” Now, in 1943, he ordered the gifted Soviet film director Sergei Eisenstein to make Ivan the Terrible. The film, written and directed by Eisenstein, was an extravaganza that portrayed Ivan as a cruel but wise state builder who united the country, and showed Russia as barbaric, splendid, and strong. Ivan, as portrayed, was “the obvious forerunner” of himself, noted Alexander Werth, correspondent for the BBC and the London Sunday Times during the war. Alexis Tolstoy, author of a play about another legendary tsar, Peter the Great, also had to edit his work to make Peter resemble Stalin: “The ‘father of the people’ revised the history of Russia. Peter the Great became, without my knowing it, ‘the proletarian tsar’ and the prototype of our Josif!”
Stalin had been thinking for a long time about dissolving the Comintern, an organization specifically charged with fomenting revolution in other countries: he thought it had outlived its usefulness. As early as April 1941, he had gone on record as saying that the Communist parties in other countries, instead of being members of the Comintern, should be transformed into national parties: “Membership in the Comintern makes it easier for the bourgeoisie to persecute the Communist parties.” Barbarossa, code name for the German invasion of Russia, had stopped the implementation of the idea. Now Stalin had the time and the platform. Molotov informed Georgi Dimitrov, the head of the Comintern, that the organization would cease to exist. On May 21, at a meeting of the Politburo in Stalin’s office in the yellow palace, Molotov read the following resolution:
When we created the CI and thought we could direct the movement in all countries, we were overestimating our forces. That was our error. The further existence of the CI would discredit the idea of the international, something we do not wish to see…There is also another motive for the dissolution…And that is the fact that the CPs that belong in the CI are falsely accused of being the agents of a foreign state…By dissolving the CI we are knocking this ace out of the enemies’ hand.
The dissolution was more than cosmetic but less than total. Molotov told Dimitrov that the Comintern’s various operations and functions would be divided up among other agencies. Roosevelt, cynically, thought of it as a hopeful step, a gesture of friendship, a step in the right direction. In point of fact it did not entirely cease to function, but it was no longer centrally controlled: its networks were merged into NKVD networks.
The dissolution clearly exposed past Soviet duplicity. The Soviet government had always maintained that the Comintern was independent of the Soviet government. In fact Stalin steered the activities of the Comintern; for years his letters to Molotov contained advice on what the Comintern should and should not do. The fictional independence of the Comintern was now fully exposed. The dissolution was well on its way when Joseph E. Davies had appeared in Moscow to set up the meeting between Stalin and Roosevelt. Stalin saw the chance of a public relations coup: announce it while Davies was in Moscow. “We ought to rush with the publication,” the premier urged Dimitrov. Dimitrov got to work, and the dissolution was announced the day before Stalin’s dinner for Davies and the showing of Mission to Moscow. Davies had been thrilled at the action. He remarked at the dinner “that when he was ambassador in Moscow, he used to say to Litvinov that the Comintern—the stick with which everybody beat the Soviet Union—was the real source of all the trouble.”
Stalin got as much mileage as he could from the act. Harold King, Reuters correspondent in Moscow, asked him what the dissolution meant. On May 28, Stalin replied, “It exposes the lie of the Hitlerites to the effect that ‘Moscow’ allegedly intends to intervene in the life of other nations and to ‘Bolshevize’ them. From now on an end is put to this lie.”
In keeping with Stalin’s new vision, fostered by FDR, that Russia would emerge from the war as a world power rather than the embattled proletarian pariah it had been before the war, Stalin realized that Russia needed a professional, elite officer corps that could deal as equals with those of other countries. As he would say to the English interpreter A. H. Birse, “We have good generals in the Soviet Army. Only ours lack breeding, and their manners are bad. Our people have a long way to go.” In August 1943 nine Suvorov Military Schools were established, named after Alexander Suvorov, the great eighteenth-century Russian general who never lost a battle. The schools were closely modeled on the prerevolutionary Cadet Corps in order to create an officer caste such as had existed before the revolution. The young men would get a military education and a secondary school education that would include worldly touches, foreign languages, and social skills such as fine manners and ballroom dancing. They would emerge smart, sophisticated, and cultured. They would also look smart: student uniforms were modeled on Red Army uniforms, with epaulets and other markings. In sum, the next generation of Soviet soldiers would be on a par with the militaries of Britain, France, and America and be respected at home.
Army officers’ uniforms themselves underwent a startling transformation earlier in 1943 as the Red Army began to beat back German soldiers. In the middle of the Battle of Stalingrad, indeed at its height, as the Soviet forces gained the upper hand, gold braid and epaulets—imported from England—appeared on officers’ uniforms. It wouldn’t have been accepted before—epaulets had been torn off the shoulders of the tsar’s officers in 1917—but after Stalingrad, officers were seen as proud professionals. “Fine uniforms would have looked all wrong in retreat,” as Werth noted, but as the embattled Red soldiers clawed their way back and made the Wehrmacht give way at Stalingrad, officers as a class regained the respect they had been missing in Russia because the anger unleashed in the revolution had leveled all class distinctions. Outstanding officers were singled out and awarded new orders named after Russia’s pre-Communist great warriors: the orders of Alexander Suvorov; Mikhail Kutuzov, who defeated Napoleon; Fedor Ushakov, who served under Catherine the Great; Prince Alexander Nevsky, hero of the thirteenth century who ousted the Teutons. Officers above a certain rank were given a new code of conduct to set them off from the rank and file: they could not travel by public transport; they could not do anything as undignified as carrying paper parcels. If a general went to the theater in Moscow, he had to sit in one of the first fifteen rows of the orchestra; if those seats were sold out, he couldn’t attend. Enlisted men had to sit in the balcony.
Another, even more profound change in the lives of army officers was instituted, although later it would be countermanded: political commissars, whose job it was to oversee and spy on the officers as well as to ensure political correctness, which had the effect of dissipating officers’ prestige, were abolished. For the first time, officers had the sole responsibility for military decisions.
The diplomatic corps was also spruced up. New outfits for diplomats suddenly appeared: dove-gray suits with gold-plated buttons, set off by a peaked cap, vest, black silk socks, white shirt with stiff collar, pearl cuff links, white kid gloves, and a small dagger at the belt.
But Stalin made the biggest change, pushed by FDR, on religion. Two months before Tehran, Stalin officially rescinded his antireligion policy. He knew the Soviet Union’s negative attitude toward religion was a constant concern to Roosevelt. The president knew it gave fodder to enemies of the Soviet Union in America, particularly the Catholic Church, but it also offended him personally. Only those very close to Roosevelt were aware of his deep religious streak. Rexford Tugwell, friend and member of the Columbia University brain trust that developed the early policy recommendations for Roosevelt’s presidency, remembered that when FDR was about to institute something new, he would first ask all his colleagues to accompany him in asking for divine blessing on what they were about to do. The speechwriter Robert Sherwood believed “his religious faith was the strongest and most mysterious force that was in him.”
Roosevelt had pushed for religious freedom in the Soviet Union every chance he got. The day following Hitler’s invasion in June 1941, he had notified Stalin that American help and religious freedom went hand in hand: “Freedom to worship God as their consciences dictate is the great and fundamental right of all peoples…To the people of the United States this and other principles and doctrines of communistic dictatorship are as intolerable and as alien to our own beliefs, as are the principles and doctrines of Nazi dictatorship. Neither kind of imposed overlordship can have, or will have, any support or any sway in the mode of life, or in the system of Government, of the American people.”
In the fall of 1941, as the German army closed in on Moscow, as Averell Harriman and Lord Beaverbrook, press baron and minister of supply, were about to leave for Moscow to work out what supplies their countries could ship to the Soviet Union, FDR had seized the moment to advocate religious freedom in the Soviet Union. Stalin was desperate: FDR knew there would never be a better time. “I believe there is a real possibility that Russia may as a result of this present conflict recognize freedom of religion in Russia,” wrote Roosevelt in early September. He took three actions. The first was that he called in Constantine Oumansky, the Soviet ambassador in Washington, to the White House to tell him that it was going to be extremely difficult to get Congress to autho rize the aid he knew Russia desperately needed because of the great deal of hostility in Congress toward his country. He then suggested, “If Moscow could get some publicity back to this country regarding the freedom of religion during the next few days without waiting for the Harriman mission to reach Moscow, it might have a very fine educational effect before the next Lend-Lease bill comes up in Congress.” Oumansky agreed to attend to the matter. On September 30, FDR held a press conference during which he instructed reporters to read article 124 of the Russian Constitution that granted freedom of conscience and freedom of religion—and publicize the information. (After the press duly reported the information, Roosevelt’s archenemy, Hamilton Fish, the Republican congressman from Roosevelt’s district, Hyde Park, sarcastically suggested the president invite Stalin to the White House “so that he might be baptized in the White House swimming pool,” following which they could both “join the White House Sunday school.”)
Roosevelt next instructed Harriman, about to go to Moscow, to raise the issue of freedom of worship with Stalin. Remembered Harriman, “The President wanted me to impress on Stalin how important it was to ease restrictions on religion. Roosevelt was concerned about possible opposition from religious groups…In addition he sincerely wanted to use our wartime collaboration to modify Soviet antagonism toward religion.” Harriman raised the subject with Stalin, in a context Stalin would relate to: that the political situation and negative public opinion in America regarding Russia would improve if “the Soviets were willing to allow freedom of worship not only in letter but in fact.” As Harriman recounted, when he explained this, Stalin “nodded his head and indicated what I understood to mean a willingness to see that something was done.”
Harriman also pursued the subject with Molotov, who revealed he didn’t believe Roosevelt was being honest. “Molotov expressed to me with great sincerity the high regard that he and the others had for the President…At one point…he asked me whether the President being such an intelligent man really was as religious as he appeared, or whether his professions were for political purposes,” Harriman recalled. It was an understandable Russian reaction. Oumansky might have reported that Roosevelt never went to Sunday services at the National Cathedral, the Episcopal church where presidents and the upper-crust Episcopalians in Washington traditionally attended services (although occasionally he went to St. John’s in Lafayette Square). Oumansky couldn’t possibly have known FDR stayed away from the National Cathedral because he couldn’t stand the presiding Episcopal bishop of Washington, James Freeman. FDR had visited the National Cathedral in 1934 for a special service in celebration of the first anniversary of his inauguration at the invitation of Bishop Freeman. After the service the bishop, who was walking beside FDR as he was wheeled to his car, suggested to the president that he make plans to be buried in the cathedral crypt, as President Wilson and Admiral Dewey had done. Freeman had then suggested to Roosevelt that he dictate a memorandum, “expressing his wish to be buried here.” Roosevelt, furious, didn’t answer. Once out of the bishop’s clutches and safely ensconced in his car, however, Roosevelt kept muttering, “The old body snatcher, the old body snatcher.” A bit later, reminded of the bishop’s suggestion, Roosevelt dictated a memorandum—to his heirs—directing that he be buried at Hyde Park. He never attended another service at the National Cathedral.
Harriman made nothing more than a dent. Solomon A. Lozovsky, assistant people’s commissar for foreign affairs, waited until the day Harriman left Moscow to call a press conference; he read the following: “Public opinion of the Soviet Union learned with great interest of the press conference statement of President Roosevelt concerning freedom of worship in the USSR…Freedom of worship and freedom of anti-religious propaganda are recognized for all citizens.” But, he said, the Soviet state “did not meddle with religion”; religion was a “private matter.” And Lozovsky ended by warning Russian Orthodox Church leaders, many still in jail, “Freedom for any religion presupposes that the religion, church or community will not be used for the overthrow of the existing authority which is recognized in the country.” Furthermore, the only newspaper in Russia that ran the item was the Moscow News, the English-language newspaper that only Americans read; Pravda and Izvestia ignored Lozovsky’s comments. Roosevelt wasn’t happy; he had expected more, remembered Harriman: “He made me feel that it was not enough and took me to task…[H]e was critical of my failure to get more.”
A few weeks later, after reading a late State Department draft of the United Nations Declaration that all nations at war were to sign on January 1, 1942, FDR had told Hull to get religious freedom into the document: “I believe Litvinov can be induced to agree.” When the Soviet ambassador Litvinov, who had just replaced Oumansky, had objected to the inclusion of the words concerning religion, Roosevelt spun the words around, changing “freedom of religion” to “religious freedom.” This alteration, while slight and meaningless, allowed Litvinov to truthfully report to Moscow that he had had enough clout to make Roosevelt alter the document, thus satisfying Stalin.
In November 1942, the first crack came in the Soviet government’s antireligion stance: Nikolas, metropolitan of Kiev, one of the three metropolitans who led the Russian Orthodox Church, was made a member of the Extraordinary State Commission for Ascertaining Offenses of the German Fascists. Now, two months before Tehran, there was a big payoff for Roosevelt. Stalin, who had been a party to the closing and/or destruction of so many churches, the liquidation of 637 of Russia’s 1,026 monasteries and convents, began seeing religion not through the narrow doctrinaire lens of Communism but as an ally. This was made easier, of course, by the fact that the Church was no longer a hotbed of resistance against his regime. It had joined forces with the government in opposing the Germans; the government and the Church were now both defenders of Mother Russia.
On September 4, 1943, in the late afternoon, Stalin summoned to his Kuntsevo dacha G. G. Karpov, chairman of the Council of Russian Orthodox Church Affairs; Georgy Malenkov, a member of the GKO, the State Defense Committee; and Lavrenti Beria. After discussing the friendly role the Church was already playing in the war and the stronger role it might play in the future, Stalin announced that he had decided to immediately restore the patriarchate, which he had dissolved in 1925, and open churches and seminaries throughout the Soviet Union. Later that same evening, the metropolitans Sergei, Nikolas, and Alexius were summoned to the Kremlin and informed by Stalin of the momentous changes he had decided upon. Stalin talked with them until 3:00 in the morning, undoubtedly probing to make sure that they no longer harbored thoughts of undermining the Soviet regime. The discussion was fruitful and probably friendly. Stalin respected members of the clergy, even though he no longer believed in God, probably because his early education had been at the hands of priests.
The following day Pravda announced that the metropolitan Sergei, a great churchman who had opposed Rasputin at the court of Tsar Nicholas, had spent the intervening twenty-five years in Bolshevik prisons, and believed the Church should make peace with the Soviets, was now free and would be permitted to convene the Council of Bishops to elect a new patriarch. In addition, licenses would be issued for the opening and restoration of religious institutions, and the Church would be allowed to resume publication of its journal. Pravda gave Stalin a pat on the back, to make crystal clear that it was Stalin behind the new policy: “The head of government, Comrade I. V. Stalin, was sympathetic to these proposals and stated that the government would not stand in the way.” Within a short time the Church was a part of the establishment upholding Stalin’s right to rule.
Stalin, who had a baritone voice and loved to sing, at this time also decided that the Soviet national anthem was not up to international standards: it too needed sprucing up. He had sung in the choir in his Gori church school as a little boy and continued singing as he grew older in the seminary in Tiflis, in fact, until the seminary expelled him for revolutionary activities, he had earned his spending money by being choir leader. Oddly, all his life Stalin would while away nights singing hymns, usually with Molotov and Voroshilov, including orthodox liturgical chants and Russian folk songs that all Russians knew from their childhood. Perhaps because of this, he decided that, with help, he was fit to upgrade the national anthem. He decreed that there would be a competition for a new national anthem, that he would be the judge, that he would listen to all contestant entries, and that the contest would be at Beethoven Hall in Moscow on November 1, 1943. The day of the competition he, flanked by Molotov, Beria, and Voroshilov, arrived at 9:00 a.m. at the concert hall—one of the rare times that Stalin, a notorious night owl, is noted as being at a morning function. The group sat for four hours listening to the forty renditions, after which Stalin decided that only the lyrics of the anthem needed to be changed. After a great deal of discussion lyrics were chosen of which Stalin approved but which he insisted on endlessly changing. “You can leave the verses,” he told the lyricists at one point, “but rewrite the refrains. ‘Country of Soviets’—if it’s not a problem, change it to ‘country of socialism,’ ” then, an afterthought, he wanted to add “the Motherland.” He then approved the insertion of his own name in one of the verses: “The great Lenin lighted our path, Stalin reared us faithful to the people; Inspired us for work and great deeds.” Perhaps that had been his aim all along. The famed composers Dmitri Shostakovich and Sergei Prokofiev, obedient Soviet citizens, were put to work orchestrating the music to fit the new words. Stalin loved the result, going so far as to say that the new anthem “parts the sky and heaven like a boundless wave.”
Stalin’s desire to change the face his government put to the world continued. Sunday, November 7, 1943, the twenty-sixth anniversary of the revolution, was a day of celebration in Moscow. In the evening the celebration continued in the form of a grand party, Polina and Vyacheslav Molotov were the official hosts. The two stood under a huge crystal chandelier in the Spiridonovka Palace, an imposing Gothic mansion from tsarist times, greeting the guests. Harriman and the British ambassador, Sir Archibald Clark Kerr, attended, plus the rest of the diplomatic community. Generals, admirals, famous writers, artists, musicians—including Shostakovich in full evening dress—came to the party. The buffet, extraordinarily lavish, stretched out over twelve rooms. Many of the toasts were in English—so many that Harriman and Clark Kerr, obliged to drain their glasses at each toast, felt that Molotov had decided to make the two of them drunk. One important member of the Politburo, Lazar Kaganovich, who drank too much, began loudly sounding off about how ineffective assistance from the Americans and the British had been and suggested it was time for them to carry out their obligations: “Only a mere two percent—two percent—of what we needed arrived in time…How are you running this war? Only one full-time shift. The Red Army is working its shift. But the British and Americans are only working part time…What you need are pile drivers.” He was hurried into his coat and fur hat and bundled out of the room so quickly Harriman never even noticed him.