‘JUMP-JET’ REALITY

The P.1127, as proposed, was sufficiently promising to initiate a self-funded collaborative effort between Hawker Aircraft at Kingston and Bristol Engine Company at Patchway, Bristol, in the autumn of 1957, although at the time both companies had other more important projects on hand.

US Mutual Weapons Development Program representatives were shown a brochure at Farnborough in September 1957, and commented that twice as much flying radius would be required if the P.1127 was to have a useful military potential. A considerable increase in thrust was clearly necessary to achieve such an improvement in range. The Government had selected the Short SC.1 powered by Rolls-Royce RB.108 lift engines to provide V/STOL know-how – and said that no alternatives would be supported. If British Government policy had been imposed on Bristol and Hawker, there would have been no Pegasus engine and no Harrier.

Did you know?
While hovering or flying at very low speeds, the Harrier is controlled in roll, pitch and yaw by reaction control jets located in the wingtips, the nose and tail.
Did you know?
The Harrier can take off vertically by selecting an 80° nozzle angle and applying full power. At around 100ft the nozzles are gradually directed rearwards until conventional ‘wingborne’ flight is achieved.

By March 1958, the design of the Hawker P.1127 was broadly similar to the form of the prototype that was to commence hovering trials about thirty months later. The centre fuselage was filled by the relatively large diameter of the engine, which was to receive its air through two intakes that were extremely short (roughly equal in length to one engine diameter) and of semicircular cross-section.

The pilot was accommodated in a rather cramped cockpit, which was not raised to give a rear view. Early attempts to have two main undercarriage units mounted in the fuselage sides just ahead of the rear nozzles were abandoned because of possible blast damage to the tyres. They were replaced by a single main unit mounted just behind the engine, resulting in what was termed for marketing purposes a ‘zero-track tricycle’ configuration. The P.1127 under-carriage load distribution was somewhat between that of a ‘bicycle’ and a ‘tricycle’ arrangement: the nose unit of the Harrier GR1 typically supported 38 per cent of the aircraft weight. There were ‘outrigger’ wheels at the wingtips to provide lateral balance on the ground.

‘We believe that there is an urgent need for an operational version of the P. 1127. As soon as it can be negotiated, a contract will be placed for a limited development programme so that the RAF can have, by the time they need it, an aircraft that will in fact be the first in the field, with vertical take-off for close-support of our land forces.’
Prime Minister Harold Wilson on 2 February 1965
Did you know?
The Harrier has two control elements that a normal fighter aircraft does not usually have. These are the thrust vector and reaction control. The thrust vector is the slant of the four engine nozzles and can be set between 0° (horizontal, pointing directly backwards) and 98° (pointing slightly forwards). Thrust vector is adjusted by a control close to and next to the thrust lever. The reaction control is achieved by manipulating the control stick and is similar in action to the cyclic control of a helicopter.

The angular position of the four engine nozzles was to be selected by a single lever, mounted just inboard of the quadrant on the left-hand console. The lever controlled the supply of high-pressure air to two motors, mounted under the engine. These would turn the nozzles by a system of rotating shafts, bevel gears, chains and sprockets.

‘Slowly we were becoming less ignorant about control of V/STOL aircraft. We realised that in essence the P.1127 was rather like a house brick supported by a jet fountain, but possessing no natural stability or damping, and that controlling it satisfactorily with these jet reaction controls was going to extend our ingenuity to the limit.’
A.W. ‘Bill’ Bedford, Hawker Chief Test Pilot
Did you know?
The thrust from the Pegasus engine is directed by four jet nozzles, which are controlled by a selector lever next to the throttle in the cockpit. These nozzles swivel as one, directing the thrust from rearward to a position just forward of the vertical.

In September 1959, the Pegasus 1, rated at 9,000lb thrust, first ran on the bench. It should be appreciated that many V/STOL concepts had by that stage proved unflyable and that a massive question mark hung over the viability of the P.1127. Fortunately for Britain, there had been a series of American V/STOL failures, as a result of which both NASA and the USAF became seriously interested in foreign projects.

‘I felt like a bird out of a cage as I was free of the irritating, inhibiting restraints of the tethers. In the absence of radio there was a danger of going too high, with the risk of running out of fuel – hence my colleague had the red flag ready.’
‘Bill’ Bedford, after the first free flight

On 15 July 1960, the first P.1127 prototype (XP831) was transported by road from Kingston to Dunsfold airfield, where the final items of equipment were installed and various systems tested. The first tethered hover took place on 21 October 1960. Untethered hovering followed on 19 November and the first conventional take-off and landing were recorded on 13 March 1961. The second prototype (XP836) went straight into conventional flying trials, making its maiden flight on 7 July 1961. The initial flight trials with the prototypes showed promise, although they were short of thrust, directional stability and reaction control power in V/STOL.

A variety of modifications were applied to the six P.1127s built. The final development aircraft (XP984) had a 15,500lb static thrust (st) Pegasus 5 and this aircraft served as a trials installation for some features of the nine Kestrel evaluation aircraft (XS688–696) that followed. The Kestrel had an uprated new swept wing, a drooped tailplane and a 9in extension to the rear fuselage. Although it had no armament provisions, it did have two hard points under the wings.

Did you know?
In the early 1960s, senior officers in the RAF had the official view that ‘if it did not have swept wings and reach a supersonic speed in level flight, it was not worth bothering about’.
Did you know?
In 1961 a transonic aircraft had never before accomplished transition to and from V/STOL flight. The P.1127 could fly at any speed, from 20 knots backwards to close to the speed of sound in forward flight.

The first Kestrel had its maiden flight on 7 March 1964, and the last took to the air on 5 March 1965. A tripartite squadron, funded by Britain, West Germany and the USA, undertook evaluation of the Kestrels at RAF West Raynham, from 1 May to 30 November 1965. After the trials had been successfully completed, Britain retained two of the Kestrels (XS693 and 695), while Germany sold its three examples to America, where six were used by NASA at Edwards AFB under the designation XV-6A for a variety of V/STOL research projects.

Did you know?
In the early days, the P.1127 could only have enough fuel on board for a few minutes’ flight after a vertical take-off. Today’s descendant, the Harrier GR9, is capable of lifting and delivering to a target bomb loads almost as great as the weight of the old prototype itself.
Did you know?
The Kestrel was never planned as a definitive RAF aircraft for possible large-scale, long-term use, but as a vehicle with which the three participating nations could experiment with jet V/STOL.
‘The Kestrel was a popular, pilot’s aeroplane and the trials proved to be an outstanding success. They gave the first indications of the advantages, particularly where dispersed site operations were concerned.’
‘Bill’ Bedford