by its shape forcing the air to move faster. If
you change the shape of the wing, obviously
you alter the air flow and that can help you to
generate either more or less lift. In the wings
and tails of most aeroplanes there are movable
flaps which are known as control surfaces.
I’m more a spanners and hammers
man – but it was obviously going
to be fun helping put the
HPA together.
The control surfaces in the wings are called
ailerons. These work as opposites, so that if the
pilot pushes his joystick or control column left,
then the left wing aileron flap is raised and the
right one lowered. This changes the air flow
over the wings so that the left wing generates
less lift than the right wing. As a result the right
wing rises, causing the aircraft to bank left.
There are similar control surfaces in the tail.
On the horizontal tail ‘wing’ there are flaps
called elevators. These work together to raise
or lower the tail, thereby pointing the nose of
the aeroplane upwards or downwards. In the
upright ‘fin’ of the tail there is a rudder which
works just like the rudder on a ship, helping to
point the nose of the plane either right or left.
Our HPA was going to do without control
surfaces in the wings, but the tail was to have
both rudder and elevators. Steering the HPA
with the rudder would give us all the control
we needed. A dynamic, banking turn when
you are just a few feet off the ground and your
wingspan is more than 60 feet is almost bound
to end in you ploughing a furrow with your
wingtip and bringing the whole HPA crashing
to the ground. Best to avoid that, really. I would
find out later exactly how to operate these
controls. In the meantime, we had an aeroplane
to build, and this was going to involve messing
about with foam.
Lightweight foam and clingfilm aren’t really the
sort of materials I’m used to working with – I’m
more a spanners and hammers man – but it was
obviously going to be fun helping put the HPA
together, and the whole process had to start with
the manufacture of the parts.
Constructing the Wings
Messing about in foam might make you think
of one of those parties, but the foam we were
about to mess about with was far more serious
stuff. Ben Tindale was my guide to working
with foam. An expert in robotics engineering,
Australian-born Ben has built some fantastic
machines for his company, Tindale Systems,
to manufacture all manner of tools and
components. He was to take the CAD (computer
aided design) blueprints from Alex’s team and
turn them into actual components.
The machines Ben worked with produced
components that were accurately engineered
to within fractions of a millimetre, yet he too,
like Alex and his team, applied a ‘suck it and
see’, trial-and-error approach to the HPA.
Despite all the time they spent on painstaking
calculations, they were always willing to go
back to the drawing board if something didn’t
work. Ben described projects like the HPA as
encompassing his ‘Holy Trinity’, as he put it:
‘You think a bit; you build a bit; then you go
out and hurt yourself. It’s amazing how you
can come up with a better idea when your knees
are bleeding!’
A bit of a joker he may be, but Ben’s machines
were something else. With the CAD design
for a wing section programmed into his foam
fabrication machine, I stood back and marvelled
106
HUMAN POWERED AIRCRAFT