**TEXT: H. H. Joachim, Aristotle on Coming-to-be and Passing-away, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1922

1Frag. 8 Diels-Kranz.

2Frag. 21, lines 3 and 5, Diels-Kranz.

3See Physics I 6–9.

4See Physics 258b10ff.

5Below, II 10.

6Joachim excises the parenthetical sentence. (In the Oxford Translation he preferred
to transpose it to follow ‘ . . . either generically’ in line 19.)

7See Physics IV 6–9.

8See Physics 226b21–3.

9‘One or more arguments against the Eleatic theory appear to have dropped out’ (Joachim).

10See Timaeus 53Aff.

11See esp. On the Heavens III 1.

12Joachim marks a lacuna in the Greek text after τῇ δὲ μή, line 6: the words within pointed brackets are his attempt to fill in the gap.

13See Timaeus 49Dff.

14See Physics I 6–9.

15The ancient commentators take Aristotle to be referring to Plato’s ‘unwritten doctrines’; Joachim thinks that the reference is to Timaeus 35Aff.

16See Timaeus 54BD.

17Frag. 17, line 17, Diels-Kranz.

18Empedocles, frag. 37 Diels-Kranz.

19See Empedocles, frag. 8 Diels-Kranz.

20About Nature (περὶ Φύσεως) was the title of Empedocles’ scientific poem.

21Empedocles, frag. 53 Diels-Kranz.

22ib., frag. 54.

23See On the Soul I 4–5.

24See I 7.

25See Phaedo 96Aff.

26See Physics II 3–4.

27See Physics 260a26ff.

28See Physics 255b31ff.

29See Physics 217b29ff.

30The text is corrupt at this point.

31Reading κύκλῳ ὁ ἥλιoς.