Introduction
Port Pirie Lead Smelter located in South Australia has been in continuous operation for more than 128 years. The smelter annually produces 225,000 t refined lead and 500 t silver in dore [1], making it one of the largest pyrometallurgical primary lead smelting facilities and one of the top five largest silver producer globally. A redevelopment of the Port Pirie Smelter is underway to transform its operation from that of primary lead smelter into a highly flexible poly-metallic processing and recovery facility [2].
The lead smelting process begins with the oxidation of lead concentrate to lead oxide sinter/slag and SO2 gas. The lead oxide is then reduced to produce lead bullion and zinc rich slag . At the later stages, the lead bullion is sent to a pyrometallurgyical lead refinery to increase its purity and to recover precious metals concentrate, while the zinc rich slag is processed in a slag fumer to recover Zinc Oxide .
At the Port Pirie Smelter, the reduction of the lead oxide sinter/slag to the lead bullion is carried out in a blast furnace . The blast furnace sidewalls are made of several hollow steel jackets, which are water cooled. The use of water-cooled jackets results in the formation of an accretion (frozen slag ) layer, which protects the surface of the furnace sidewalls from the molten charge. Due to the formation of protective accretion layer, no refractory lining is required in the furnace .
Severe interruption in the continuous operation of the blast furnace can happen due to the failure in the water-cooled jackets. Previous visual examination showed the presence of marks and holes on the hot surface of the jackets, which indicated aggressive chemical attacks of the jackets from the inside of the furnace .
The aim of this work is to investigate the lead blast furnace water-jacket stability using a combination of microanalysis techniques using SEM and EPMA, phase equilibria analysis and thermodynamic modelling using FactSage [3] with an advanced thermodynamic database . The advanced thermodynamic database contains slag /matte/metal/speiss/solids phases and multi-component Cu2O–PbO–ZnO–Al2O3–CaO–MgO–FeO–Fe2O3–SiO2–S major and As–Bi–Sb–Sn–Ag–Au minor elements system, which has been developed within a lead consortium research project at PYROSEARCH funded by several major lead producers.
Sample Collection and Analysis Technique

a Schematic section of the bottom part of the lead blast furnace [4] and approximate area of water jacket sample collection is indicated by the dotted square; and b Water jacket area with clear evidence of corrosion

Macro-appearance of steel jacket samples: a As-received samples from Port Pirie; and b Cross-sectioned of samples showing ~3 mm of reacted layer

Macro-appearance of as-received tapped lead bullion sample
The steel jacket and lead bullion samples were sectioned to approximately 15 mm × 15 mm × 10 mm and were mounted in epoxy resin. The mounted samples were polished using automatic polisher TegraPol-31 (Struers, Denmark) and carbon coated using QT150TES carbon coater (Quorum Technologies, UK). Optical microscopy and SEM with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) detector were used for initial microstructural and phase analyses.
Compositions of the phases in the steel jacket and tapped lead bullion samples were accurately determined using an EPMA, JEOL JXA 8200L (Japan Electron Optics Ltd., Tokyo). An acceleration voltage of 15 keV and a probe current of 20 nA were used. The Duncumb-Philibert ZAF correction procedure supplied with the JEOL JXA 8200L probe was applied. Suitable reference materials from Charles M. Taylor, Stanford, CA which include Cu, Fe, InAs, PbS and ZnS were used as standards.
Microanalysis Results
Steel Jacket Sample

Back-scattered electron image of the steel jacket sample with reacted layer
Summary of phases compositions in steel jacket sample from EPMA analysis
No | Phase | Composition not normalized (wt%) | Total | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pb | Fe | As | Zn | Cu | S | |||
1 | FeAs speiss | 0.05 | 87.4 | 10.0 | 0.05 | 2.4 | 0.03 | 99.9 |
2 | FeAsZn-speiss | 0.31 | 47.1 | 27.6 | 16.9 | 5.9 | 1.28 | 99.1 |
3 | Steel jacket | 0.04 | 99.01 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 99.2 |
4 | Metallic lead | 99.7 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 99.9 |
5 | CuZn(γ) | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 58.9 | 38.0 | 0.01 | 97.1 |
6 | As2Zn3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 40.5 | 53.8 | 0.34 | 0.04 | 94.7 |
The FeAsZn-rich speiss appears to be in a liquid state at the operation temperature . The FeAs-rich speiss was observed in two different morphologies, i.e. (i) a dense layer attached directly on the surface of steel jacket; and (ii) globular-shaped material within the FeAsZn-rich speiss matrix. The presence of dense layer of FeAs-rich speiss indicates that the phase was solid, while the globular-shaped FeAs-phase appears to be particles detached from the FeAs-dense layer. The mixed speiss (FeAs–FeAsZn) layer was estimated to have average composition of 64.2wt%Fe–20.5wt%As–9.9wt%Zn–4.6wt%Cu.

The As–Fe binary phase diagram [5]
Apart from the speiss phases, intermetallic compounds of CuZn(γ) (melting point = 834 °C for pure compound [6]) and As2Zn3 (melting point = 1015 °C [5]) were also observed in the sample. The presence of the Zn-containing speiss and intermetallic compounds can be related to the high-Zn pressure condition in the area where the sample was collected.
Tapped Lead Bullion Sample

Back-scattered electron image of the lead bullion sample
Summary of phases compositions in the lead bullion sample from EPMA analysis
No | Phase | Composition not normalized (wt%) | Total | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pb | Fe | As | Zn | Cu | S | |||
1 | Metallic lead | 98.1 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 98.2 |
2 | PbCu matte | 43.6 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 40.1 | 14.9 | 98.8 |
3 | Cu-rich matte | 3.3 | 1.08 | 0.09 | 0.20 | 75.4 | 20.9 | 100.9 |
Thermodynamic Analysis
Thermodynamic modelling to investigate a possible water jacket failure phenomena has been carried out using FactSage [3] with the most recent thermodynamic database developed by PYROSEARCH specifically for lead smelting . The advanced thermodynamic database contains sophisticated mathematical models of Gibbs free energies for all relevant phases in the chemical system. The Modified Quasichemical Formalism in Quadruplet approximation [7]: [Pb2+, Cu1+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Si4+, Al3+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Zn2+, As3+, Sn2+, Sb3+, Bi3+, Ag1+, Au1+] [O2−, S2−] is used for the slag . The matte, metal and speiss phases are modelled in one solution based on the Modified Quasichemical Formalism in Pair approximation [8]: (PbII, CuI, CuII, FeII, FeIII, ZnII, AsIII, SnII, SbIII, BiIII, AgI, AuI, OII, SII). The database also includes a wide range oxide and metal solid solutions, pure compounds and more than 100 gas species.
There are two regions of concern related to the stability of the water jacket. In contact with the lead bullion there is no freeze lining. Above the level of the bullion a slag freeze lining is formed on the inner surface of the water jacket.
Speiss Formation
The stability of the water-jacket steel wall without freeze-lining is related to the formation of the complex Fe-rich speiss phase. Thermodynamic prediction of the formation of speiss has been carried out by considering interaction between solid iron and lead bullion. The prediction was done by reacting 5 grams of solid iron and 95 grams of liquid Pb. This solid iron and liquid Pb ratio was selected since in practice the steel jacket was continuously exposed to a stream of lead bullion for a significant period of time. The base case composition for lead bullion used in the prediction was taken from average historical plant data from 2017, i.e. 95.5wt%Pb–2.4wt%Cu–0.47wt%As–0.70wt%S–0.86wt%Sb.

Thermodynamic prediction of speiss formation based on contact of 5 grams of solid iron and 95 grams of liquid Pb: a Phase proportion as a function of As in lead bullion at T = 900 °C; and b Critical As concentration in lead bullion for the formation of liquid speiss at T = 850 °C–950 °C
Freeze Lining Thickness/Stability

Thermodynamic prediction of freeze lining thickness/stability: a Proportion of phases as a function of temperature (slag composition at point 1); b Proportion of liquid slag as a function of temperature ; c and d Slag compositions (point 1, 2 and 3)
Figure 8b shows the proportion of liquid slag as a function of temperature and slag composition. The prediction results show that a slight change in CaO/FeO/ZnO/SiO2 proportion in the slag can drastically change the proportion of liquid. It can be seen that phase assemblage containing 70% liquid slag + 30% solid phases can be found at higher temperature when moving the slag composition from point 2, point 1 to point 3. This phase proportion (70% liquid slag + 30% solid) is selected as an indicator for comparison. The ability to predict the phase proportion can be used to optimize the freeze lining stability in the furnace .
Blast Furnace Simulation
Summary of Blast Furnace simulation outputs
Reactor | Temp [°C] | Product [t/d] |
---|---|---|
Bullion | 1210 | 465 |
Liquid slag | 500 | |
Solids | 11 | |
Reactor gas | 1359 | |
Condensor | Temp [°C] | Product [t/d] |
Recirculated dust | 400 | 398 |
Off gas | 1068 |
The prediction result gives 512 t/d of bulk slag containing 2.9wt% Pb and lead bullion with 95.1wt% purity. The prediction shows high As concentration in the bullion of 0.55wt% As and high quantity of recirculation dust containing 0.86wt% As. All of these may contribute to the increase of As within the furnace , which can lead to the formation As-containing speiss and the failure of water jackets.
Several possible factors that influence the stability of lead blast furnace water-jacket have been identified from the present work, such as: (i) Hot face temperature of the water jacket; (ii) Freeze-lining formation; and (iii) Speiss formation or speiss attack. Possible measures to prevent failure of the water jacket have been proposed which include: (i) Control of cooling water and blast furnace hearth temperatures; (ii) Adjustment of the blast furnace hearth slag composition to optimize slag liquidus ; and (iii) Control of maximum As intake in the furnace feed. It has been proposed to review and introduce controls and limits of important operation parameters, as well as to conduct laboratory and modeling studies to quantitatively confirm the operational limits.
Conclusion
The stability of lead blast furnace water-jacket has been investigated using coupled microanalysis techniques using SEM and EPMA, phase equilibria analysis and thermodynamic modelling using FactSage [3] with an advanced thermodynamic database . The analysis of water-jacket sample showed the presence of As-containing speiss which lead to aggressive corrosion of the steel jacket. The stabilities of the water-jacket steel wall without and with freeze-lining have been evaluated based on various factors. The present study shows that the advanced thermodynamic database developed by PYROSEARCH for lead smelting can be used to predict the outcomes of the operation and to optimise the operation chemistry.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Nyrstar for the financial support and permission to publish the present data. The authors acknowledge the support of the AMMRF at the Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis at the University of Queensland. The authors are grateful to Prof. Peter C. Hayes for valuable discussion during the preparation of this manuscript.