As his Brighton train drew out of Victoria Station five minutes behind schedule on the last day of his life, the theatre critic A. S. Crystal made a note in tiny handwriting: ‘Complain to train company.’ He had often travelled on this notorious line, and it had often disappointed, but until today he had let it pass. Today, however, he was in no mood to be charitable; the delay was unacceptable, and a complaint would duly be made.
Crystal was under no particular time constraints, as it happens. He would be spending the whole day in Brighton before attending a new play at the Theatre Royal in the evening. The lost five minutes were arguably immaterial. But he was a tightly wound man at the best of times and today he was especially tense, mentally girding himself for A Shilling in the Meter, whose reputation preceded it.
An angry play, by all accounts. A shocking play. A ‘new’ play, by a northern writer. Crystal hated it already, hence his fury with the train for starting late. Had he not met his end in Brighton within the next twelve hours, a swingeing letter on Daily Clarion headed notepaper would have been typed and dispatched as soon as his secretary Miss Sibert arrived the next morning at his serviced flat in Great Russell Street.
A middle-aged man in a smart grey raincoat, with a beaky nose and wire-rimmed spectacles, Crystal did not conform to the popular idea of the theatre critic. He had none of the flamboyance (long hair, opera cloaks, affected speech impediments) usually associated with the trade. His speaking voice was thin and reedy, and he had apparently never heard of deodorant. Arriving for a glamorous first night in the Haymarket or Drury Lane, Crystal looked more like a man sent in by the Revenue than an influential writer with millions of readers, who could decide the fate of a production by the use of one single, devastating adjective.
But he was rightly feared by everyone in the theatre. Today’s paper contained a Crystal opinion piece lambasting the principle of knighthoods for actors; last year he had famously exploded the chances of a gritty northern drama called Clogs on the Batty Stones by dismissing it in just twelve (now-legendary) words: ‘Wooden clogs, wooden dialogue, wooden acting; and thicker than two short planks’. There was something of Robespierre about Crystal. He was Robespierre with BO. It was his plain duty to point out deficiencies in every aspect of life. When something needed to be said, it was unthinkable that A. S. Crystal would not step up to the mark and say it.
Years before, in fact, when he had been assistant manager of the Aldersgate Branch of the Albion Bank, he had spoken up even when armed criminals were holding him at gun-point. Not to beg for his life, or to reason with the robbers. No, he had spoken up purely to press home some unwanted critical points.
‘You’re doing this very badly,’ he had said, addressing a masked woman armed with an exotic Luger pistol.
‘Put a sock in it, Stinky,’ she had replied, pointing the barrel straight at him.
Those were her exact words. In his statement to the police afterwards, Crystal was able to reproduce precisely many things this masked woman had said; it was his facility with remembering dialogue on a single hearing that was the basis of his later confidence as a critic.
‘You’ve also chosen the wrong day,’ he had objected later, from his position tied to a cashier’s swivel chair with a canvas bag over his head. ‘There would have been far more cash in the safe if you’d come tomorrow afternoon.’
But no one cared what this little bespectacled assistant manager thought. Loud shots were fired at the ceiling, as the two robbers gathered the bags of loot in the middle of the banking hall. This was especially terrifying for Crystal. With his head in the sack, he alone couldn’t tell the direction she was firing.
‘I’m not kidding!’ The woman was concluding the proceedings. ‘I promise I’ll shoot the next person who speaks. Now, I’m asking: any more for any more?’
At which point, she and her confederate had left the building with untraceable notes to the value of £25,000, never to be caught.
Crystal had at first seemed untroubled by the bank raid. For three months or so after the Aldersgate Stick-up (as the incident came to be known), he waved aside all offers of sympathy, and continued his work at the Albion Bank. And then one day he found himself on a number 8 bus in New Oxford Street, weeping and shaking uncontrollably. For the next six weeks, his mother fed him oxtail soup in bed at home in Hoxton, and when he finally re-emerged, unsteady, into the world, he found strange but wonderful solace in the theatre.
There was something cocoon-like in the darkness and the plush seats of those West End spaces; even if guns were fired in the plays, the bangs were planned for, written, part of the design. He loved drawing-room comedies and well-made plays. He revered the work of Terence Rattigan. Above all, he loved the community of the audience together in the dark – although people sometimes noisily vacated the seat next to him. After a while, he started submitting critical articles and feature pieces to the weekly papers, which he was delighted to see in print.
Not that he was a pushover as a critic; quite the reverse. He simply applied his own rule of thumb. When he saw beauty and wit and order reflected on the stage, he hailed it. Conversely, when he saw ugliness, passion and violence, he bowed to no one in his determination to stamp them out. It was the same feeling he had had during the bank raid: when something needed saying…
Tonight’s play stood for everything Crystal detested. True, he hadn’t seen it yet, but he knew all about its writer Jack Braithwaite’s infantile ambitions to shock and outrage the theatre-going public. This being 1957, a revolution was already tearing down the comforting old French doors and drawing-room scenery; in its place were kitchen sinks, mangles, and actors in string vests. Beautiful diction was out; regional invective was in.
Jack Braithwaite was not a leader in this revolution, but he was an articulate follower, and a forthright spokesman, with the sort of youthful arrogance and broody bespectacled looks that evidently made quite sensible women fall at his feet. An actor-turned-writer, too (they were always the worst). Crystal had already gone head to head with him on a BBC discussion programme, during which Braithwaite said, memorably, that if he ever wrote anything well-made, he’d have to ‘cut off his own two guilty hands’. He had also said that old-school critics like Crystal should be ‘put out of their misery’. Miss Sibert, speaking out of turn for once (she usually knew her place), had begged her employer not to go and see the new play. ‘It vill only upset you!’ she had said (she had a German accent).
But he could not shirk a challenge, so here he was on the train. Also, there was someone he desired to speak with in Brighton, so he could kill two birds with one stone. A Shilling in the Meter was bound to be sordid, hectoring, formless, northern in origin, and long – Crystal’s top five dislikes. As the train picked up speed on the outskirts of the capital, and the bombsites became fewer and farther between, he picked up his notebook. He had an observation for the review.
‘Rather than putting his shilling in the meter, perhaps Jack Braithwaite should have given a bob to a Boy Scout, to write the play for him,’ he wrote. (It had been Bob-a-Job Week quite recently; Crystal always enjoyed a topical reference.) ‘The Boy Scout would undoubtedly have done a better job than our long-haired northern friend in his absurd black turtleneck sweater and winkle-picker shoes.’
If this excellent sentiment turned out not to work in the context of the review, he could save it for another day. It was all grist to the mill. If it worked nowhere else, he would squeeze it into the memoir he was currently writing with Miss Sibert’s help – a memoir linking a) the restorative world of the theatre with b) the life-changing trauma of the Aldersgate Stick-up, and c) the role of chance in a person’s life. The book was thus far tentatively titled A Shot in the Dark.
* * *
The same morning, in the Lanes in Brighton, a prematurely bald antiques dealer named Henry (‘The Head’) Hogarth paid £50 for a set of antique coins that he knew for a fact to be stolen. The anonymous seller of these dodgy goods – who sported an improbably large nose and a jet-black moustache – hinted that, all things being equal, there might be more business they could do. Henry the Head said he welcomed such news. He was ‘always in the market’, he declared, cheerfully – and tilted his head forward to show the words ‘Always in the Market’ tattooed in cursive script on the top of his shining, shapely pate.
Before he left, Henry’s customer paused at the door and asked a bizarre question.
‘You don’t need to answer this,’ he said, ‘but would you say you are a fond father, Mr Hogarth? Would you say you love your children beyond the usual bounds?’
Henry the Head hesitated. Was this a threat? A threat to his kids? He tensed up. Under the counter – out of sight – was a cricket bat, and instinctively he grasped its handle.
‘I’d never grass, mate,’ he said.
The man held up his hands in a reassuring gesture.
‘No, you misunderstand, Mr Hogarth. It’s just an intuition I have about you. I wondered if I was right?’
Not letting go of the bat, Henry the Head decided to answer. ‘I’d die for my kids,’ he said. ‘Now, what do you want to make of that?’
‘Nothing,’ said the man, opening the door. ‘I’m very pleased to hear it, that’s all.’
* * *
In the preceding two weeks, the police in Brighton had become aware of a spate of house burglaries. In all cases, there was little to go on, and the officers could only take note of the valuables stolen and ‘circularise’ (official word for circulate) the details to pawnbrokers within the town. Appearing on the most recent list was the same collection of priceless antique coins that had just come into the possession of Henry the Head. When the file of witness statements was perused by Inspector Steine of the Brighton Constabulary, nothing in particular stood out as offering a helpful clue, beside the fact that all the break-ins had taken place between 7.30 and 9.30 on weekday evenings when the houses in question were empty.
On the day of A. S. Crystal’s visit to Brighton, Inspector Steine spent the first half hour of the morning in his office examining this file, which had been prepared for him by his ‘bagman’ Sergeant Brunswick. It didn’t make him happy. Being a sensitive soul, it pained Steine to think of innocent citizens arriving home in the evening to discover they’d been robbed; it was very depressing, and he was rather inclined to be angry with Brunswick for bringing it to his attention.
But he took some small comfort from this file nevertheless. Two or three of the victims, he noticed, mentioned that on the day of the burglary a smartly dressed woman with bright auburn hair had called at the house in the afternoon and interviewed them on behalf of the national Public Opinion Poll. She had stayed around forty-five minutes and taken a particular interest in whether the householders kept a dog, whether they had any plans for the evening, and whether any window catches at the back of the property were especially in need of repair. This was all great news as far as Inspector Steine was concerned. He had always hoped one day to be interviewed by the Public Opinion Poll. How pleasing to discover that attractive female pollsters were operating in the Brighton area!
‘Circularise details to pawnbrokers,’ he wrote on the cover of the file, and handed it to Sergeant Brunswick, who was standing patiently beside the desk.
‘Yes, sir,’ said Brunswick, reading the instruction. ‘You don’t think the red-head is important?’
‘Not really,’ said Steine. ‘She was only mentioned by one or two people. But I certainly hope she calls at my house, don’t you?’
And there the investigation might have ended. But as Brunswick turned to go, the station charlady, Mrs Groynes, entered Steine’s office with his ten o’clock cup of tea and plate of custard creams, accompanied by a tall young police constable in a helmet, who politely helped her with the door.
Inspector Steine acknowledged him, with a questioning raise of an eyebrow.
‘Constable Twitten, sir,’ said the unknown young man. He sounded well educated and unusually keen. He also sounded as if he thought his arrival was expected. ‘Reporting for duty, sir,’ he added, in a rush. And then, unable to suppress his excitement: ‘Reporting for duty to the great Inspector Steine!’
Steine nodded. ‘Thank you, yes, that’s me,’ he said, quite kindly. ‘You may remove the helmet.’
‘Thank you, sir,’ said Twitten.
Steine hoped this would mark the end of the interview. ‘Good, good,’ he said, and shuffled some papers on his desk. The day ahead looked unusually demanding: first, he had to finish writing a talk for his weekly BBC Home Service series entitled Law and the Little Man. Later, the theatre critic of the Daily Clarion was intending to visit him at the police station. Evidently this man remembered Steine from a long-ago case called the Aldersgate Stick-up.
Crystal had been a witness, apparently; Steine the investigating officer. In his letter to Steine, typed on Daily Clarion headed notepaper and postmarked WC1, Crystal claimed that the trauma had altered the course of his life. Steine’s total lack of success in breaking the case at the time (by finding no leads) had robbed Crystal of both his chance to obtain justice, and also to shine in court. Steine sincerely hoped he wasn’t about to receive some sort of ticking off.
‘He’s seen that film of yours any number of times, isn’t that right, dear?’ said Mrs Groynes, nodding towards young Twitten, who was still standing awkwardly to attention in front of Steine’s desk, helmet under his arm. She flicked a feather duster over Inspector Steine’s Outstanding Policing Award certificate in its ornate silver frame. Mrs Groynes wore a floral overall and brown lace-ups. Her hair was tied up in a paisley scarf. Steine had spoken to her before about her habit of wittering on, but it turned out that the wittering was non-negotiable if you wanted the tea and biscuits.
‘It was The Middle Street Massacre that made me decide to become a policeman, sir,’ gushed Twitten. ‘Father wanted me to study kinship systems in the Fens! But I saw The Middle Street Massacre, and then I read all the books about it, and I’m afraid I defied Father and enrolled for Hendon, and – I’m sorry, sir, you’ll know all this already from my file, of course. The awards and commendations and so on. So I’ll pipe down, shall I, sir? Yes, I think I should probably pipe down.’
Steine smiled again. He had no idea who Twitten was. He had seen no file. He looked optimistically at Brunswick, but from the sergeant’s dazed expression, it seemed that he didn’t know anything about Constable Twitten either.
‘Just so,’ Steine said.
And then Mrs Groynes said something that brought Inspector Steine a strange discomfort, and had such a powerful effect on Sergeant Brunswick that it seemed to raise the temperature in the room.
‘This young man won a prize at Hendon for forensic observation,’ she said.
‘Did you, son?’ said Brunswick, powerfully interested. ‘Forensic observation?’
‘Yes, sir,’ said Twitten, blushing.
‘Top of his year,’ added Mrs Groynes.
Steine said nothing. Was this young know-it-all coming to work here? He hoped not. It was bad enough keeping Sergeant Brunswick in check.
‘How do you feel about criminals, son?’ Brunswick demanded.
Twitten looked surprised by the question, but answered it. ‘I wholeheartedly oppose them, sir,’ he said. ‘Don’t you?’
At this, a mixture of unfamiliar emotions appeared on Sergeant Brunswick’s face – his usual pained expression giving way to amazement, disbelief, a little bit of triumph and (most unfamiliar of all) hope.
* * *
At the Theatre Royal, the five cast members of A Shilling in the Meter were assembling onstage for a meeting with the author. Prior to its opening night in London the week after next, the play was being ‘tried out’ in Brighton – a place famous for the regular tipping up of seats during performances, as outraged retired colonels struggled to their feet and hobbled out in noisy protest. The actors were right to be worried about tonight’s first public performance. A Shilling in the Meter was overlong, quite hectoring, utterly sordid, unapologetically northern in origin and completely formless – the five top dislikes of retired south-coast colonels (although they wouldn’t have been able to compile the list themselves: they relied on A. S. Crystal to do it for them in their favourite establishment newspaper).
The play’s protagonist was a disaffected youth who made speeches about the evils of conformity; water dripped irritatingly from a fractured pipe in the ceiling into an old tin bath below; a dirty lavatory was on show throughout; and to top it all, in one of his rages, the unappealing central character Nick murdered his hapless girlfriend by first assaulting her with a hot iron and then smothering her under an old, stained mattress.
But it wasn’t any of these unpleasant particulars that had precipitated the cast rebellion. Playwright (and director) Jack Braithwaite had instructed the management that, at the end of the play, the National Anthem should not be played. It was possible there would be a riot tonight – which in terms of publicity, of course, would do the play no harm. But for the actors, it was worrying; the three older members of the cast had pressed for this meeting with Braithwaite, to ask him to reverse his decision. Having Braithwaite’s luminously beautiful current girlfriend amongst them in the cast – young Penny Cavendish, in her first leading role – was an advantage here. She could act as a bridge to the author, who otherwise scarcely gave his small troupe of players the time of day.
But they would have to wait for Braithwaite. He was in the circle bar, about to give a quick interview to a youth from the local press – a youth who had, literally, drawn the short straw. Braithwaite was a famously difficult interviewee (it contributed to his sex appeal), so the call for volunteers at the Brighton Evening Argus had been fruitless, hence the drawing of lots, using matchsticks.
‘Did you say you don’t want a drink?’ Braithwaite now called to the young man from where he was standing at the bar.
Ben considered his response carefully. Was this a trick question?
‘Yes, thank you,’ he called back, politely.
‘Now, what the bloody hell does that mean? “Yes, thank you”?’
‘Well, it means –’
‘Yes, please, you DO want a drink? No, thank you, you DON’T want a drink?’ Braithwaite had evidently never heard anything more stupid than ‘Yes, thank you’.
Ben Oliver chewed the inside of his cheek and then said, with care, ‘I meant, yes, thank you for asking, I did say that I didn’t want a drink.’
‘Huh!’ said Braithwaite, as he returned to the table and sat down heavily. ‘God’s boots,’ he muttered, in an unnecessarily northern kind of way.
‘Um,’ said Ben, and cleared his throat. ‘Um, I wondered if you could tell me about your play’s title, Mr Braithwaite.’
‘What about the title?’
‘I just wondered if you could explain for our readers why it’s called A Shilling in the Meter.’
‘Bloody hell!’ exploded the easily offended playwright. ‘Where do these papers get such slobbering cretins? Why do you think it’s called A Shilling in the Meter?’
Ben looked at his notes while he decided what to do. No one had ever described him as ‘slobbering’ before. He had never slobbered in his life. It seemed a trifle unfair, in this professional context, to direct such slurs at people who were in no position to retaliate.
‘Well,’ he said, ‘I’m wondering, not having seen the play yet, if it’s to do with the last gasp of England – the last shilling running out on empire, and that kind of thing. Maybe the play concerns the frustrated energy of youth in post-war Britain, symbolised by a gas fire that keeps going out on an endless dark February Sunday afternoon.’
He looked up from his notes. Braithwaite, with a stunned expression, wordlessly waved him on.
‘If so,’ Ben continued, ‘I think that the great well-crafted plays by playwrights such as Rattigan and Priestley are about to be blown to matchwood by this hurricane-force new spirit of sexy naturalism emanating from the North.’
Braithwaite sat back. He was actually impressed. He particularly appreciated the word ‘sexy’.
‘But that’s just my guess,’ added Ben. ‘Speaking with the disadvantage of not having seen the play yet, and also as a slobbering cretin. By the way, I noticed from the cuttings that you were actually born in Portsmouth. Is that true?’
* * *
Back at the station, Inspector Steine was hoping that the others would leave his office so that he could press on with the talk he was writing. For this week’s Law and the Little Man he wanted to draw attention to the legal aspects of a notorious London football match in 1945, known as the Battle of Fulham Road, which had been such a hot ticket that fans had run amok. They had scaled buildings using stolen ladders; residents answering a knock on their front door had been rudely pushed aside by fans who took to the upper floors or stormed through gardens to get a view of the pitch; fences were torn down to be used as battering rams against locked gates.
So, on the one hand, this match had been a morale-boosting affair between Chelsea FC and a famous Moscow team (which Steine had a feeling was called the Dominoes, but some female dogsbody at the BBC would be able to check); on the other hand, there had been an enormous number of chargeable offences committed by a large group of individuals acting, as it were, with a single criminal purpose.
Inspector Steine was masterly when it came to explaining law to people who hadn’t studied it; in the years since the Middle Street Massacre, such entertaining explication had become his main career. For example, did you know it was illegal to take a billiard cue on a bus? Do you know about the origins of ‘legal tender’? If the young Queen’s playboy husband hypothetically requested you to pay his gambling debts, would it be treason to refuse?
Well, you would be well informed in such fascinating areas if you had listened to Law and the Little Man, which over the past five years had confirmed Inspector Geoffrey Steine as a household name, and had familiarised the public with such arcane legal statutes as the Public Service Vehicles (Conduct of Drivers, Conductors and Passengers) Regulations, 1936. Honestly, if it weren’t for Sergeant Brunswick constantly trying to expose criminality in Brighton, Steine would be more than happy with his lot.
Because the point was this: Steine loved the law, but he found the entire concept of criminals morally repugnant. When he adopted the famous faraway expression, he was not (as all supposed) thinking deeply: he was strenuously attempting to place himself in a calm green place beside a tinkling stream, with kingfishers flashing overhead and a snatch of Elgar on the breeze. It suited him perfectly to believe that, in a single afternoon, all the serious criminals in Brighton had killed each other, leaving the town crime-free for ever. Policing for him was about upholding the law and protecting the public, not dealing with unprincipled louts who would shoot you as soon as look at you.
‘All the Brighton criminals are dead, Brunswick,’ Steine had said to him a thousand times. ‘You saw them dead with your own eyes. And may I remind you, they even made a film about it!’
‘Yes, but that’s not quite correct, sir,’ Brunswick would reply. ‘Two gangs were wiped out, sir, I grant you. But there are still dozens of villains, sir. Dozens!’ And then he would start tiresomely reeling off names like Stanley-knife Stanley and Diamond Tony, Fiveways Potter and Ronnie the Nerk. ‘It’s my belief they’re all controlled by Terence Chambers in London, sir. Working through a trusted deputy, as yet unidentified.’
It had been hard work suppressing Sergeant Brunswick’s policing zeal for all these years. Of late, Steine had resorted to a regular, meaningful reply to all of Brunswick’s reports of robberies and assaults: ‘I fear this case will baffle all our efforts to solve it.’ It had become a kind of mantra. No wonder Steine looked at this young Twitten now with a certain dread – especially when Brunswick handed Twitten the file concerning the break-ins.
Steine tried to object. ‘Brunswick! We don’t even know who he is!’
But Brunswick defied him. To Steine’s annoyance, he asked the young man, ‘Would you study this for me, son, and tell me what you make of it?’
To which Twitten, anxious to impress, replied, ‘I already have, sir. And it’s surely obvious that the flame-haired female is the key.’
* * *
A. S. Crystal of the Daily Clarion alighted neatly from the train at 11 a.m., and adjusted his spectacles. He was happy because he had already composed a large part of his review. Technically, any critical assessment of the play need not be written until the week after next, when it had officially opened in London. It was also unfair (and deeply frowned on) to review a production before it was ready. But Crystal had decided to dispense with the usual protocol. His intention was to kill off A Shilling in the Meter before it was even born.
As he left the station amid a herd of shrieking holidaymakers, he felt the cool punch of sea air in his face and stomach, and recoiled. There was nothing about Brighton that wasn’t tawdry and second-rate, he thought. Stuck badly on an old wall opposite the station entrance were garish, tattered posters advertising the delights on offer in the town beyond: the Palace Pier, the Hippodrome. At the Hippodrome the current star act was evidently ‘Professor Mesmer, the Last Living Phrenologist’ – which just about said it all. A fake, outmoded science exercised in a fake, outmoded place. ‘Come and have your bumps felt by the Great Professor Mesmer!’
‘Ugh!’ said Crystal, closing his eyes in disgust. Thank goodness the Clarion never required him to cover acts like that. He would rather (in that memorable image) cut both his hands off – except that, unlike Braithwaite, he appreciated what logistical difficulties that bloody job would present, if you actually tried to do it.
* * *
At the Theatre Royal, Braithwaite had finished with the reporter, and reluctantly met with his cast onstage in the darkened auditorium, on a set built to represent a grimy basement room lit by an upper, barred window and two naked light bulbs. On behalf of the others, who perched on the tea crates that comprised the major furnishings, Penny begged him to reconsider about the National Anthem.
What he wanted this morning was to run a dress rehearsal of Act One. After that, he intended to take Penny to a boozy lunch in the Queen Adelaide with a chum of his from drama-school days, who happened to be in town. He was in no mood for protests and naysayers; in no mood for these irksome actors. He had embarked on his theatrical journey believing that he liked everything about it, but now he realised there was one small part that didn’t suit him at all: this disagreeable requirement of working with other people.
He surveyed his cast now with genuine dislike. The young leading man Todd Blair was a vain little insect, of course – but since he played the part of Nick (and therefore delivered three-quarters of the dialogue), Braithwaite had been obliged not to express this opinion too openly. Sporting a fashionable quiff, Blair had recently appeared as a hopped-up juvenile delinquent in a Dirk Bogarde film, and was, truthfully, the main reason people were buying tickets, so if he wanted to address Braithwaite as ‘Daddy-o’ occasionally in rehearsals, that was clearly his prerogative.
Where Braithwaite’s patience had not stood the test was when Blair challenged any single detail of Nick’s behaviour (‘I’m just wondering if even Nick would say something so mean, you know?’). Such impertinent questions were off-limits, and had resulted in a few nasty scenes, with Jack telling Todd that until he was Marlon Brando he could keep his ruddy trap shut.
Penny, of course, playing the girlfriend Ruby had been a delight to work with, mostly because she loved him and thought (rightly) that he was not only masterly in bed, but a genius in an active relationship with the zeitgeist. Being a classy girl, she also knew when to keep quiet.
But the others! The couple playing Nick’s stick-in-the-mud parents were obstinate time-server types who never expended a pound of effort if half an ounce would do; as for old Alec Forrester, who played the unnamed Man from the Gas Board, he’d been a thorn in Jack’s side from the start. Casting a former matinée idol in such a demeaning role had appealed to his iconoclastic nature, but any malicious pleasure had soon evaporated once rehearsals had begun. The man with the smallest part was the biggest irritant – forever campaigning to change his lines; making suggestions for improvements to the script; reminiscing at length about playing one of the Lost Boys in the original production of Peter Pan; making odious comparisons between this play and great works by Priestley, Rattigan and Maugham.
It was true that this was Jack Braithwaite’s first mainstream production, and that a bit of humility might not have gone amiss. It was true that Jack Braithwaite knew pitifully little about the history of the British stage. But he was a rising star whose picture had appeared in magazines, and he wasn’t going to be humiliated by the actor playing Man from the Bloody Gas Board, however many anecdotes the tedious old stager could tell about what ‘Larry’ said to ‘Vivien’, and what ‘Johnnie’ had said to them both.
Things came to a head between Alec and Jack at this meeting. It was hardly good for cast morale that a violent spat should break out between writer and Gas Board Man with a first performance looming later in the day. It was unfortunate for Braithwaite, too, that young Argus reporter Ben Oliver was sitting quietly at the back of the stalls in the dark, and witnessed the whole thing.
But resentments had been building between the two of them ever since Alec had first tactlessly pointed out that Man from the Gas Board was a ‘colourless cipher’ and needed (at the very least) a Scottish accent. Today, under the spotlights, as tempers flared between them, and Penny tried to intervene, Jack accused Alec of being a ‘pathetic toupéed has-been’, while Alec called Jack ‘jumped-up’ ‘talentless’, ‘derivative’ and (worst of all) ‘totally cloth-eared’.
The two men behaved very differently during their argument. Jack became restive and loud, and started pacing the stage – from tin bath to ironing board, and back to tin bath – while Alec sat upright on his tea chest, hands on his knees. Todd Blair and the others started to quite enjoy it. The exchange might be acrimonious, but it was packed with home truths. For example, Alec Forrester actually was a has-been, and he did wear a toupée, and he was pathetic.
And then Alec dropped his bombshell. ‘Well, we’ll see what Algernon makes of it, shall we?’
For a moment confusion reigned. Algernon who?
‘You know him as A. S. Crystal, I suppose. Of the Clarion. I’ve invited him to see the play tonight, and asked him to pay particular attention to the under-written part of Man from the Gas Board. If I know Algernon – and I do know Algernon – his review will appear tomorrow.’
Braithwaite was so shocked that he stopped pacing the stage, coming to rest near the ironing board. The others held their breath. ‘He can’t do that,’ he said. ‘It’s the first bloody performance!’
‘He shouldn’t, but he can,’ laughed Alec, nastily. ‘As you would know if you knew anything about the theatre.’
And then Braithwaite did something that shocked everyone. He grabbed the iron from the ironing board and threw it full force at Alec Forrester. Penny screamed; Todd Blair shouted ‘My face!’; and all took cover, including Alec, whose ginger hairpiece fell off in the mêlée.
Fortunately, the iron didn’t travel far, being heavier than it looked. It dropped like a stone without hitting anybody, just as the house manager yelled from the wings, ‘What’s happening here?’ and switched on the house lights to reveal a tableau of disarray on the stage, and at the back of the stalls a cub reporter from the Brighton Evening Argus nestled into his seat, making notes in an excited manner.
‘You!’ shouted the house manager. ‘Out!’
‘Just going,’ Ben Oliver called back, preparing to leave. ‘But bravo, everyone. Bravo!’
* * *
Back at the police station, Twitten explained how he had come to read the file on the break-ins.
‘It was while I was waiting for everyone to arrive in the office this morning,’ he said. ‘I’m sorry, sir. Perhaps I should have waited?’
‘You most certainly should,’ said Steine.
‘But I found the statements so interesting I couldn’t put them down, sir. The fact that several of the victims received a visit from the same red-headed Opinion Poll lady – well, what a lead! She was obviously casing the joint for the burglar who came along later in the evening.’
Steine harrumphed. ‘There’s no “obviously” about it.’
‘The inspector’s right,’ said Brunswick, loyally. ‘This is the real world, son. You’re not in Hendon now. It was only a couple of the victims who reported this woman, isn’t that right, sir?’
‘Just one or two, as I recall,’ said Steine.
‘It was four, sir! And I hope you won’t be cross, but I decided to telephone all the other victims to see if they’d had a visit from the Opinion Poll lady themselves –’
‘It seemed like the obvious next step, to establish the pattern. Witnesses are notoriously unreliable when it comes to mentioning details they think the police won’t consider relevant. At Hendon we were taught about it as “FOWPT”, or Fear of Wasting Police Time, sir. I can show you the relevant section in the latest training handbook if you like.’
‘No, thank you,’ said Steine.
‘Anyway, my hunch paid off, sir. All of them had received an identical visit!’
‘What?’ said Brunswick, a half-smile of astonishment on his face. This surely couldn’t be happening. Who was this boy?
‘I know, sir. All of them including the woman who lost the antique coins. She lives quite nearby in Upper North Street, so I’ve made an appointment to go and interview her this afternoon at half-past two.’
Twitten paused. From the way everyone was looking at him, he sensed something was wrong, but he had no idea what it was. So he pressed on.
‘There’s just one more thing?’ He looked to his superior officers for a signal to continue, but they were too stunned to give it. There was an awkward pause. Spotting the problem, the charlady spoke up.
‘Go on, dear,’ she said, kindly.
‘Thank you, Mrs Groynes. The thing is, the Opinion Poll lady always gave her respondents tickets to the Hippodrome for that evening, as a way of thanking them for their time, and no one had mentioned that in their statements, had they? To my mind, this omission was a classic example of witness “FOSTMAOS”, Fear of Saying Too Much About One’s Self, which is a recognised sub-division of FOWPT, Fear of Wasting Police Time. So if she’s handing out tickets to the Hippodrome, she might have some connection to that establishment, which I believe is in Middle Street, sir.’
‘I know where the Hippodrome is, thank you, Twitten,’ said Steine, feeling himself on firm ground at last.
‘There’s an old phrenologist topping the bill at the moment, sir,’ added Twitten. ‘But that might not be relevant.’
He stopped and looked round expectantly. Oddly, there was no round of applause.
Brunswick put his hands to his face.
Mrs Groynes turned away, saying, ‘I’ll put the kettle on, shall I, dears?’
Steine looked out of the window. His expression was suggestive of deep thought. (He saw two kingfishers, and heard the sound of distant panpipes.)
‘You can come with me this afternoon to Upper North Street if you’d like to, Sergeant Brunswick,’ Twitten added, excitedly. ‘After all, it is your case.’