twelve
DOWSING & VIEWING
Perhaps the only limits to the human mind are those we believe in.
WILLIS HARMAN, president of IONS, 1977-1997
WHEN I WAS A LITTLE GIRL, a dowser came out to my grandmother’s farm to walk the pastures looking for water, or rather for where to place a well. Everyone who grows up in the country is familiar with these so-called water witches, who have the ability to take a slender Y-shaped branch in their hands (preferably hazel, willow, or peach), stride up and down the hills, and find by the bending of the branch the best site for drilling. (A variety of rods, straight or bent, wire or plastic, are used for dowsing as well as for finding minerals, pipes, oil, and electrical and other forces.) I was about twelve at the time, and curious. I remember I took the dowser’s branch and discovered I, too, had the gift—except in reverse! The branch tore the very skin off my hands as I struggled to keep it from moving. It lifted its point skyward and twisted round, slashing, whipping me in the face! I felt humiliated when the grown-ups laughed, but I had no doubt about what happened, for I’d done everything I could to prevent the stick from moving. I don’t use the gift, but on those occasions when for fun I’ve tried, the wand always behaves in the reckless same way: swiveling skyward and around toward me instead of dipping courteously toward the earth and the water lying hidden in its depths.
My daughter and her husband have a place in Massachusetts. When they wanted to drill a well, they called in a renowned dowser.
“We want to know where to drill the well,” Jonathan needlessly explained.
“Whoa. Wait. Back up. How deep do you want it? No point having to drill down too far. Shall we ask for, what, up to five hundred feet?”
“That sounds good. Okay, let’s go.”
“Whoa. Wait a minute. You want good-quality water, right? It should be pure. How many gallons a minute? No point getting a trickle. Shall we say fifty gallons a minute?”
Jonathan laughed. “Whew! That’s a lot! But all right, why not? Better more than less.”
Only then did the dowser move outside to walk their land. After a time he indicated the exact spot. “Dig here.”
At roughly 250 feet, they struck the purest, most delicious water you’ve ever tasted flowing at, you guessed it, fifty gallons a minute.
Dousers use all sorts of tools: a wire coat hanger stretched into a long thin strip can be used; or two wires bent at nintydegree angles and one held in each hand. At a party in Brittany, I once met a French dowser, Jean Unguen, who showed me the thin, flexible, plastic twenty-seven-inch-long wand he used to find electrical or geological fault lines. He told me how a farmer once called him to find out why the sows in one sty produced fat, healthy piglets and those in the nearby sty brought forth only sickly, weak little creatures that often died. Unguen dowsed the farmyard with his wand, made his determination, and told the farmer to place a magnet. “Here. On this fence post. And don’t move it.”
I don’t know how the farmer managed to attach the magnet to the fence, but afterward the piglets in the unhealthy sty were born as fat and frisky as anyone could wish. Something in the farm was electrically “off.”
We’re out of the realm of personal intuition now, but dowsing is an age-old occupation, another tool of psychic exploration. I remember laughing with Jean Unguen as he told me tale after tale of his professional work. After a bit I asked if he could help me with my house! At the time I owned a beautiful house in the fashionable Georgetown neighborhood of Washington, D.C. The only problem was it made me sick; that is, I always felt a little poorly in the house, not badly, but enough to feel low or tired, out of sorts.
“Make a floor plan of the house when you get home,” Unguen said. “Do it on graph paper, exact to the centimeter, and mail it to me. I’ll dowse it with my pendulum, and then we’ll talk by phone.”
His Breton accent was thick enough to make me hesitate at the idea of a phone conversation, but I followed his directions, mailed him a precise floor plan, exact to the centimeter, and worked out a time to talk. He said a fault line ran diagonally under the dining room, that I needed to place a magnet in the living room to balance the fault. I’d have to phone him when I was ready, and he would indicate to me long-distance the exact site for the magnet.
The first problem was how to put a magnet in the middle of the living room floor without having it kicked or sucked up by the vacuum cleaner. Fortunately we had a “mother-in-law” apartment in the basement just below. I could attach the magnet to a ceiling panel below that hid the underside of the living room floor.
I asked my French niece over to translate for me on the telephone. Then you should have seen us as we sat on the basement floor, trying to tape the magnet to the basement ceiling (the reverse side of the living room floor). We placed the ceiling panel on the floor, the magnet on the panel. Unguen, in France, directed the operation.
“Move the magnet slightly left,” he directed us, holding his pendulum over the drawing I had sent him. “Down a little. Up. Over. There! Right there!”
My family thinks I’m nuts. I taped the magnet in the exact spot and guess what? Never again did I feel ill in the house!
We’re far removed, it seems, from intuition and psychic studies, precognition and clairvoyance, but they are related, at least to the degree that we don’t know what’s going on beyond the fact that a pendant or dowsing tool offers some people the ability to “see” or “feel” or “sense,” in ways we cannot understand, things that they have no right to know.
But you don’t need the wand!
I have a sensitive friend, Elizabeth Paige. One day, hiking alone in Crete (for these images often come when you are alone), she found herself in an isolated little valley with the stonework remains of an abandoned farm. She stood a few moments near one of the roofless stone huts (a former springhouse?) and shuddered as she saw with movie-clip clarity a young woman in long skirts who, standing near the hut, looked up from her work and was washed by terror. She’d seen her father leading his donkey up the hillside on his way home, and a wave of panic had swept over her, knowing that once again he would assault her. Incest! Rape! She had no way to protect herself. Her loneliness. Her helplessness. Her isolation. Blink! The vision lasted only a second, but it was so strong that my friend could not shake it. She hurried away. She never doubted that for one moment she’d ripped the fabric of time and seen the resonance of a real event.
IT WAS THE WRITER C. M. Mayo who suggested that if I was interested in intuition I should take a class in controlled remote viewing. I had first read about remote viewing around 1979, in the Science section (I believe) of Newsweek. But the term had been coined earlier by physicists Harold Puthoff and Russell Targ at Stanford Research Institute and published first in Nature. It caught the attention of the right people, and the CIA gave the laser physicists $50,000 to conduct formal studies. It was simple. They placed a psychic in a soundproof, lead-lined, windowless Faraday room to shield him or her from external electromagnetic waves or radiation. Three “sites” were blindly chosen at random, slipped into three sealed envelopes, and given to a driver. He was told to get in the car, choose one envelope, open it, drive to that site, and look around.
Meanwhile, the psychic, comfortable in the windowless room, was already sketching the site that had not yet been chosen. The sketches proved remarkably accurate. One showed a child’s playground, I remember, and the psychic managed even to hear the squeak of the rusty swings and the laughter of the children.
The article made a profound impression on me, but I heard nothing more for decades. It turns out the military had also been impressed and began their secret experiments in psychic spying around this time, operating out of a purportedly abandoned shack in Fort Meade, Maryland. Lyn Buchanan was one of these military “viewers,” and his book The Seventh Sense is a jewel of information about these now declassified experiments. When the military unit closed down in 1996, at the end of the Cold War, and Buchanan left the military, he and his wife, Linda, set up a business, Problems Solutions Innovations (did you notice the acronym psi?) to help businesses grow, find lost children, work with police, diagnose health problems, and teach people how to do controlled remote viewing, for it is Lyn’s premise that with practice we all have these powers.
CRV was not created for psychics. It was created for the nonpsychics, for the “ungifted.”
LYN BUCHANAN
Various organizations now teach remote viewing, including the Monroe Institute in Faber, Virginia. At my friend’s suggestion, though, I chose to take the basic course from Lori Williams, Buchanan’s talented student, in Amarillo, Texas. (There are many levels to CRV, the advanced courses being taught in Alamogordo, New Mexico, by ex-military viewer Buchanan, but Lori teaches the introductory basic course.)
It would take too long to explain the process and be so boring that you would wander off to a Terry Pratchett novel or some video game, and who could blame you? Suffice it to say that on the first day we were taught a series of ideograms or hieroglyphs that provide a language to the wordless, imagistic subconscious mind, allowing it to shift information into our conscious minds. The seven ideograms are: land, water, man-made (object), biological or organic (material), space/air, motion/energy, and natural (material). Refinements are added in later courses. Controlled remote viewing takes left- and right-brain functions into account, but it doesn’t draw on brain-wave frequencies or energy fields.
Having taken only the basic and intermediate courses, I can only describe my experience at this somewhat primitive level of intuitive viewing. At the end of the first day’s introduction we were ready to try.
“Choose a number between one and twenty,” said Lori.
“Seventeen.”
“Is that seventeen counting from the top or from the bottom of a stack?”
“From the top.”
“Good.” She left the room together with Karen, my classmate, took an inch-thick file of photographs, counted seventeen pages from the top, slipped number seventeen into a folder, and returned.
“Okay,” she said. “What is the target?”
“What! Are you crazy?”
“Work the site. You know how to do it now. Use the ideograms.”
The amazing thing is how much you know! It may take an hour to “work” a target, or even days; the choice is left entirely up to you.
In the advanced classes you learn to determine dimensions (length/width/height), history, time frames, and various other factors that permit not only viewing the target through a glass darkly but also putting the various pieces into a cohesive whole in order to understand the image or site itself.
CRV found that intuitive functions are highest when performed within one hour of each side of 1,347 hours sidereal (or star) time. They are lowest within half an hour of each side of 1,800 hours. Sidereal time differs from solar time by four minutes a day. On only one day a year are the two the same. A sidereal clock is required for calculating sidereal time.
THERE’S A CERTAIN IRONY to the fact that it’s the military that hacked a pathway into this wilderness of intuition, and you can’t help but admire the sturdy, structural discipline of the military approach. On a sheet of paper, any conscious reasoning of left-brain logic is recorded down the right-hand side of the page. The illumined intuition of right-brain insight is recorded on the lefthand side of the sheet. This is in accordance with the way the left brain governs the right side of the body, and the right brain governs the left side.
While searching with the right-brain inner eye, you occupy your analytical mind by jotting on the right-hand side of the paper every thought, conclusion, doubt, and castle it wants to build in the air. Conscious thoughts are recognizable as sentences and nouns, for the perceiving intuitive mind works only in symbols, imagery, and descriptive adjectives and adverbs. It knows no nouns. If you think “squirrel,” therefore, you record it as a left-brain conscious thought. If you think “small, biological, furry, swinging, stopping, scooting, quick,” you can be pretty sure you are “viewing” with right-hemisphere intuition. Remote viewing insight only describes.
One interesting phenomenon: When your subconscious mind is fully activated, perceiving, you lose the ability to spell and write. Your hand shakes. Seeing in pictures, you lose words. Instead, you draw.
Only the military could have dredged, mined, sorted, sifted, and sculpted this brilliant entry into intuition, the Seeing Soul, as it were (though the military would not call it that), whereby anybody—you, me, your little sister, your irritable husband, your defiant disbeliever, anyone at all—can work the puzzle.
Is time a barrier? No. Space? Piffle! You leap over tall buildings in a single bound, flying to far countries quick as thought. Wonder Woman and other superheroes—they all have less sophisticated skills than the ones we everyday perceivers utilize! And, most astonishing, it takes only one three-day weekend and considerable practice to hone these skills. (After the weekend, you have to practice with the discipline of a martial art, to which it is compared, for it takes practice, practice, practice to get good at it.) I don’t need to add that all “remote viewers” have poor sessions sometimes, coming up blank, but often they hit the target spot on. No meditation is involved, no tarot or crystal balls, no pendulum or smoking incense, no crystals, no angels, no spirit guides—nothing but your inner wisdom as you listen to your heightened perceptions, aware of sites far distant from your senses.
I think the subconscious, if it is indeed the seat of intuition, is usually consigned to the basement, chained like a madman in the cellar from whence his howls and banshee wails cause shivers in the upstairs host (“Quick! Pour another drink!”). Demonic, we call it, or the work of the devil, without understanding that the luminous and inarticulate presence of this voice of glory is always on our side.
THOSE ASSOCIATED with Buchanan’s controlled remote viewing are careful to assert that this acquired skill is different from psychic abilities! Nonetheless, they claim it increases intuition, as the subconscious learns a way of communicating with the conscious mind.
“The difference,” wrote Lyn Buchanan to me in an e-mail, “is actually a very large one, in that intuition or psychic faculties is an ability. CRV is a set of tools that give you control over the ability.” The tools are based, he continued, on discipline and practice, on mind-brain studies, and on interviewing or reporting techniques.
If psychic gifts are likened to a vacation in the country, controlled remote viewing is the car that takes you there quickly and under your own power. Once you are at the vacation site, it gives you freedom and mobility. The car is not the vacation, but it’s an efficient mechanism for controlling your trip. And then he added, distinguishing his work perhaps from that of some others, “Remote viewing is the New Age term for ‘psychic ability.’ Controlled remote viewing is the name of the set of tools that put you in control while you’re using your gifts.”
CRV is not a toy. It can be dangerous. I spoke earlier of the blurring of boundaries, especially in children. With controlled remote viewing you may get sucked into the target in the same way, caught in a mud slide, or blown up by a bomb; or, if it is a human, you can enter so fully into the mental state of the subject that his way of thinking becomes yours, at least for the duration of the session—a danger if you’re viewing a psychopath.
“Mental access,” writes Buchanan, “at the level provided by the CRV process can be very dangerous to the viewer.” When the target is a person, you describe; you don’t try to access or get inside the other person’s mind! The boundaries are slippery, enchanted, and entrancing, as you will see in the following chapters.
Inviting Intuition IV: Using the Pendulum
Because everyone is different, there are no hard-and-fast rules for learning intuition, except the one concerning stillness and deep listening. But once you can easily attain a quiet and attentive “no-mind” state, the pendulum becomes a wondrous tool.
You may use any pendant hanging on a chain or string. A sewing needle works perfectly. Thread the needle with about twelve inches of thread and tie a knot (to keep it on the needle). Hold the knot, allowing the needle to swing free. (It may be easier to see if you hold it over a dark surface or your hand.)
Empty your mind. Go into the space of no-mind.
First you must create a relationship between yourself and your pendulum. Ask the needle to show you “Yes.” When I do it, the “Yes” presents as a vertical swing or, sometimes, when the pendulum is wildly enthusiastic, as high, fast, clockwise circles.
For “No,” the pendulum swings horizontally back and forth or else in passionate counterclockwise sweeps. But bear in mind that if your pendulum reverses this signal, that’s perfectly all right! What’s important is that you and your pendulum work together and that you both understand the signature.
Once you feel comfortable with your pendulum, you begin to work with it. Remember it can respond only with Yes or No. Your questions, therefore, must be phrased in such a way that it can provide you with either a positive or negative answer. If you ask something like “What shall I do about X?” the pendulum, helpless, will either stand still or weave the air in sinuous coils, expressing hesitation, anguish, frustration, like a dragon coiled in its lair. Break the question down.
“Should I contact X?”
“Yes.”
“By e-mail?”
“No.”
“By phone?”
“Yes.”
“Should I phone tomorrow?”
“Yes.”
“Should I call before twelve noon? Before ten o’clock? Between ten-thirty and eleven o’clock?”
“Should I apologize?”
By the time you use your pendulum daily or even several times a day, you will have acquired one that appeals to you—a jeweled watch fob, perhaps, a gold cross, or an amethyst carved and shaped into a fine point—and you’ll ask your questions and receive responses swift as thought: no one could imagine what you’ve done. But until that time and while you are learning, I suggest that each time you pick up your pendulum, you ask it for permission to work with you. Each time ask it to show you Yes and No. (There’s no point misreading the message from your higher senses).
Each time ask it three questions: Could I ask you about X? Should I ask about X? And finally, May I ask?
If you receive a deliberate “Yes” for each of the three, then boldly form your questions. You can also use the pendulum for long-sighted, farsighted information.
Your questions may be as important as whether to quit your job or change your daughter’s school. Or they may be as silly as whether your husband, who is traveling, is still asleep or if he can be phoned. Let’s say you’ve planned to meet a friend in a café and you forgot to confirm. Will he be there? Ask your pendulum. It will tell you. (You could also call on your cell phone, I agree.)
I used to dislike pendulum dowsing simply because I could make the pendant give any answer that I chose! But once you learn to empty yourself of desire for an outcome the pendulum becomes another useful tool.
The Ethics of Dowsing
Never use your pendulum in a public space, like a subway or business meeting, where strangers can see you. (Of course, if you are participating in a psychic circle or using it to give a reading on behalf of someone else, that’s another story.)
There are several reasons. First, someone may be tempted maliciously to deflect it by sending it a contradictory thought (psychokinesis), and don’t imagine that the pendulum won’t respond. Or, someone could unconsciously interfere merely by the strength of his or her energy field, and torque your answer like a compass needle shifted from true north.
But second, it’s not respectful of either the pendulum or the people around you.
Keep your pendulum in a pure and private place. Treasure it.
Remember that the pendulum, like a crystal ball or the tarot, is nothing but a tool. As you become adept, you may set it aside. You’ll scry with your perfected intuition. The answer comes instantly without the tool. Even then, however, if you’ve been ill or thrown off center by an unexpected blow, you may wish to revert to the pendulum. If you haven’t used it in a while, remember to begin each time afresh, asking it for Yes and No.