FOREWORD

For almost three decades, Barnett Rubin has been a most acute observer of Afghanistan’s iterated wars, as well as an activist in the protracted search there for justice and peace. For the past dozen years, his perch for that work was the NYU Center on International Cooperation, where I have the privilege of being his colleague.

Barney is not your average scholar. Like the best academics, he is deeply versed in the literature and theory of conflict, in the methods of empirical research, and in the region that has now been most of his life work. Unlike most academics, he has the kind of in-depth knowledge of the culture, history, and people of Afghanistan and its neighborhood that often surprises Afghans themselves. I got a glimmer of how unusual is his expertise when I was given an account of a meeting he attended along with an Iranian diplomat in Dubai (this at a time when only a handful of Americans had any contact with official Iran), conducted partly in terms of trading refrains from Iqbal, the Indo-Pakistani poet-philosopher—in Farsi. Barney’s insight into the relationships that shape the local and subregional dynamics of the Afghan wars is unparalleled.

After September 11, and through 2008, Barney was called on by the UN’s Lakhdar Brahimi, by the Afghan authorities, and by the NATO allies with increasing frequency—and with increasing despair about the missed opportunities, errors in misunderstanding, and mistakes of strategy that characterized much of the coalition effort. Barney was never content to carp on the sidelines, though, but took every flight and invitation to publish, brief, or advise to help shape, wherever he could, a more productive engagement.

One person who saw Barney’s unique value was Richard Holbrooke. They had worked together when Barney ran the Council on Foreign Relations’s groundbreaking project on preventive action in the mid-1990s, when Barney was also writing his seminal books The Fragmentation of Afghanistan and Blood on the Doorstep. When Holbrooke became chair of the board of the Asia Society, he called on Barney to work on their Afghanistan program, culminating in an influential study, “Back from the Brink,” cochaired by Barney and master diplomat Tom Pickering. When President Obama and Secretary Clinton tapped Holbrooke to serve as special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, he again turned to Barney for advice. For two years, Barney gave frequent and always richly informed advice to Holbrooke and the secretary.

One of the things that distinguish CIC from many academic centers is the understanding that policy advice is conveyed most effectively through people, not papers. We recruited highly talented people such as Jake Sherman, Rahul Chandran, and Tom Gregg to complement Barney’s work on Afghanistan, enabling him to devote a substantial portion of his time to advising Holbrooke, as well as maintaining his unique dialogue with the Afghans and their neighbors. I am very grateful to our donors—especially the Norwegian Ministry for Foreign Affairs—for supporting our Afghan program generously, but more important, flexibly. Through and around Barney’s effort, CIC, Norway, and the U.S. government have become partners in the search for an end to this long episode of the Afghan wars. We were together in Dubai for a joint CIC/Norwegian workshop on the regional dynamics of a potential Afghan peace, whose outcome Holbrooke was anticipating, when he was suddenly and tragically felled by an aortal aneurysm.

All wars shape their protagonists, but some wars shape more than just those who fight them. The U.S. war in Afghanistan is one such war. The U.S. effort to eliminate or at least contain the threat posed by al-Qaeda, the allied effort to rebuild Afghanistan after this and previous wars, NATO’s role in both military and civilian operations, and the regional and international effort to stem the flow of opium from Afghanistan all have reshaped the way international security is perceived and managed. For readers who want a richer understanding of the Afghan war, or of how that war has shaped the broader international system, this compilation of Barney’s writings provides both evidence and insight. For those who wish to understand what comes next, it’s an essential read. The critical reader will notice that most of the ideas that now shape U.S. and international approaches to Afghanistan found an airing in Barney’s writing well before they came to fruition in policy. Most important, Barney was an early—and frequently lonely—voice for reconciliation when many in Washington preferred to believe that military strategy alone could prevail. Presidents Obama and Karzai have come around to Barney’s view—not least because Barney was dogged in explaining the rationale for reconciliation to Holbrooke, notwithstanding its costs and its discomfort, and strategies for achieving it. When Marc Grossman took over as U.S. special envoy, he too sought Barney’s help and advice, and reconciliation has been a central theme of the U.S. effort since. As I draft this introduction, new agreements among the Taliban, President Karzai, and the United States herald the first public step in a move toward a political settlement to end this round of Afghanistan’s long war.

That first step is tentative and fragile, and there will inevitably be reversals and crises—probably several of them—before real progress is recorded. In time, though, and with patience, the United States can help forge a political process that preserves essential gains in freedom and rights but accommodates those Afghan forces never included in the Bonn accords. If such an agreement is eventually negotiated, credit will go to those political actors who had the courage to stand firm on core principles and the equal courage to make necessary compromises to avoid another generation of bloodshed. History rarely gives credit to those who think the issues through and agitate behind the scenes. But if Afghanistan does reach a reasonable peace, Barney’s ideas and his tireless agitation and advice on behalf of Afghanistan will have played a crucial role.

Bruce Jones

Director and Senior Fellow, NYU Center on International Cooperation

Director, Managing Global Order Project, the Brookings Institution

January 2012