Antony Sutton produced several different newsletters during his lifetime as a way to stay in touch with his many readers and to continue his research on his many varied interests. The revenues were meager but did help to defray his research costs. From 1982 to 1997, he issued the Phoenix Letter and from 1990 until his passing, he published Future Technology Intelligence Review (FTIR). Here from October 2001 to April 2002 FTIRs is Tony sharing his thoughts on the September 11th attack and an article on Skull & Bones that he had written before the terror event. These are followed by articles from his Phoenix Letter about the Order of Skull & Bones. Some from when he first began writing about the Order.
A Monthly News Letter Devoted to Technical Prediction
October 2001: Vol 12, No. 10
Why 1831? Because German philosopher Georg Hegel died in 1831 and the Hegelian secret society (Yale) Skull & Bones, to which Bush has sworn eternal silence, was created in 1832.
Like Nazism, Communism, and Prussianism, groups, like S & B and Bohemian Grove are based on statist Hegelian idealism, the precise opposite of our ideal of Constitutional liberty and individual rights. The Owl of Minerva is the symbol of Bohemian Grove and the Owl of Minerva is also the title of the Hegelian Society Journal in the United States.
So what, you say? Because you will understand coming events in future technology and the roles of S & B and Bohemian Grove much better if you put to one side the artificial divisions of left and right, Republican and Democrat, and the hypocritical prattling of their members.
These elitist groups are Hegelian and believe the State is run for the benefit of the “Masters” (Hegel’s term). We are mere “Slaves,” the peons, who do their bidding. Understand this and you will understand the trials that await New Technology down the road a way. Okay, you say, but I always knew we were peons, and somebody unelected was running the show. The point is that no academic has yet pinned this control down to an operating philosophy working in defiance of the U.S. Constitution. Suspicion is not enough. Throwing names around is not enough. Big charts with lots of arrows is not enough. We have to pin down the how and why, the operational procedures. If we are right in our analysis, you will in coming years see another layer of the onion skin peeled back. The Emperor really has no clothes.
The Bush Administration is no different from the Clinton Administration when it comes to new and more efficient energy technology. Both Administrations publicly ignore new technology or define it as beefed up, old technology to favor those interests who pay vast sums to support the two major parties — and get a piece of the action.
We hesitate to recommend Hegel for your reading. We see Hegel as turgid nonsense, but very influential. If you want Hegel’s statement on the relations between “Master” (them) and “Slave” (us), see pages 520 to 523 of Phenomenology of Spirit. This is the section on “Lordship and Bondage.” (We term it, “Master and Slave”):
The self consciousness of the Lord is essentially related to the being of the mere things he uses and uses up, and these he enjoys through the bondsman’s (slave) self consciousness. The bondsman prepares and arranges things for the enjoyment of the Lord.
In brief, the function of us — the slaves — is to work for the Master. See Bush/Cheney as the Lord and you and I as the slaves, then it all becomes clear. Our job is to go along. Theirs is to steal and grab and enjoy the product. The State is the vehicle they use to grab the product legally. The State is the Master, and we are supposed to be obedient slaves. Quite a racket, if you can keep it going. And this is the purpose of Bohemian Grove and Skull & Bones. Clever, isn’t it? You are all running around thinking Republican and Democrat, while the real action is somewhere else.
So within this Hegelian frame, let’s take a look at the Bush-Cheney energy plan.
The Bush-Cheney energy plan is wholly based on conventional fossil-atomic technology owned by the same interests that financed Bush and are prominent in the S & B and Bohemian Grove. If the steam and water wheel interests had kicked in for his re-election, no doubt they would have a place in the Bush-Cheney Plan. It’s all about cash for re-election, put up enough cash, and you become one of the Masters.
Bush actions follow closely Hegel’s plan for the “Masters.” The Masters should not be interested (according to Hegel) in new discovery. Leave that for the slaves to develop. “Masters” prefer to milk the old, which generates profit and give them control. Hegel is therefore intimately related to Skull & Bones and Bohemian Grove. The reason that outside observers have not been able to get a handle on establishment power is because they have been trapped into a right-left dichotomy and kept there by carefully baited political promises, rarely kept except to financial contributors.
Collection of names and organizations is insufficient. One needs to know their operating philosophy to learn their goals and how they achieve their goals. This is not political meandering. Unless you understand the control features in today’s world, you cannot make correct decisions on future technology.
The input for the Bush-Cheney energy plan came only from conventional energy interests. The Administration refuses to release the working papers. Why? Because these will demonstrate that only a few energy firms got access to Cheney with their proposals. These were clearly self-serving proposals. No one else was even considered. Certainly not renewable energy sources or free energy. Just as Hegel would have it. Those who gather at Bohemian Grove and Bones — the Masters — got the rewards. The citizen slaves who do the thinking and the development get nothing.
Same with Clinton. The Clinton Administration engineered a sabotage plan in 1996 to collapse the Congress on Free Energy scheduled to be held in Washington, D.C. Bush-Cheney just left them out of consideration.
This closed-shop procedure is, of course, the fascist tableau, and directly out of Hegel, who also provides the philosophic fuel for fascism and communism. So far, only a few commentators have made this observation, and wherever you took your “poli-sci” courses didn’t tell you this.
Our name for the Bush-Clinton version is “smiling fascism,” and it stems directly from the “right Hegelians” of the 19th century. Bush himself can trace to 1832 through Skull and Bones, and its formation in 1832 in Hegelian Germany and the U.S. Even Domhoff, who has written in detail about Bohemian Grove, missed the link to Hegel through Minerva the Owl.
Today, according to our sources, Morgan Stanley is preparing the IPO for Black Light Power (proven free energy). It will come to market in about two years. Wall Street (a lot of the Masters hang out in Wall Street) needs these two years to dump conventional energy assets. But don’t be surprised if a wrench gets thrown into the works. We don’t trust Washington, D.C. one bit when it comes to New Technology or what they will do with the technology as they try to seize control.
Similarly, California utilities are trying to dump their resource assets onto the State and the taxpayer before they become worthless. This is right on schedule as we predicted many years ago. First, fuel cells will have a run in about 2003 and 2004. Then free energy will start to emerge.
By 2005, everybody and his dog will be looking for free energy proposals. Another dot.com mania in the works. This will be the time to be very, very wary. The most probable systems are already known today, but, suddenly, you will be offered participation in a score of systems whose free energy potential cannot be proven.
By 2005, the insiders will have dumped conventional energy assets long before the BLP IPO hits the market. Be careful. We know of only three, maybe four useful free energy technologies: BLP, MEG, Cold Fusion, and a Canadian project, already picked off by the U.S. Navy.
MEG is not in as strong a position as BLP because Colonel Bearden is U.S. Army (Retired), and subject to pressure. We like his technical approach, but Bearden himself well knows the pressures he faces.
Cold fusion is fully proven, but not yet repeatable. It was deliberately crippled, early on. The initial blow to destroy was cast by former President Bush (also S & B) in 1989. The Canadian project is based on nanotechnology and is way over unity (>1000%). This was demonstrated to the U.S. Navy — and then disappeared.
Note also that BLP has a director (Brewer) who was former Assistant Secretary of Energy in the Reagan Administration. BLP is described by the Internet service, <psst-heyu.com> as the “one that got away.”
Maybe not quite a plausible theory is that if free energy is to emerge, the U.S. Government (run by the Masters) would much prefer a government monopoly or control by interests close to the Masters. In other words, make a profit out of something essentially free. How to seize it? There are many ways. At the moment, we say no more.
Free energy would of course be a useful lever to promote their New World Order. NWO could then come charging down the road as a White Knight to rescue the world from energy paralysis.
Almost simultaneously, the revolutionary potential in radionics is emerging. But out of England, not the U.S. The AMA believes it has this potential locked up. We don’t think so. What may happen is this: the AMA will suddenly get religion and adopt radionics. Stranger things have happened.
Most important here is the theoretical justification for radionics formulated in the work of the late famed quantum physicist, David Bohm, one-time Professor of Physics at University of London.
Take a look at Chapter 7 of The Undivided Universe, by Bohm & Hiley, entitled “Non locality.” Bohm says the opposition to “non locality” (this is what physicists call “action at a distance”) has a historical explanation, and Einstein’s “spooky action” comment is not based on science or logic, but on mere assumption.
While Maperton provides proof of concept for non locality and neatly gets around AMA/FDA dictates by computerization, David Bohm is the source for theoretical support.
But most people are like Einstein and think of all action as local. This assumption does not reflect observation, and in fact, is a continuation of Isaac Newton’s comment that non locality is a “philosophical absurdity.”
The establishment is headed, then, towards two roadblocks. Free energy is here, proven and scheduled for installation about 2004 - 2005. The earlier Bush administration shot down cold fusion with a stacked Blue Ribbon Committee, but Randall Mills was too persistent and thorough. The government will have to make a deal with Mills or go the seizure route.
Medical radionics is here, proven and available, free today.
Note the use of the word “free” in both cases. Not quite free, but close enough. If it is free, it cannot be controlled for private gain. Nobody can own it. What the U.S. can do is impose a tax to remove the free aspect or donate the technology to friends.
This, alone, guarantees more skullduggery in coming years. No way are the powers that be going to allow free energy without their control. This is fundamental. If Randall Mills is stubborn and won’t make a deal, they use national security. And if you don’t know how they use national security, then read our America’s Secret Establishment. Randall Mills is not Tony Sutton. We would promptly put the BLP patents into the public domain, and make the lab information freely available. But Mills has sweated blood for 10- 15 years and deserves a payback; so do his loyal shareholders.
Does Washington know all this? Possibly most politicians and bureaucrats do not. But what about those who make the decisions?
We can go back 30 years, and cite CIA Director William Casey, who said CIA did not know the West built the Soviet Union until the 1970s. Yet the State Department files (State used to do the CIA’s job) are crammed with information (Microcopy 316).
That’s where we found the story in the 50s and 60s. (Casey was not courteous enough to cite this Editor as the source of his knowledge, but have you ever known a Government official to be courteous? — or truthful?)
Probably the strangest part of this story is that Secretary of State Dean Rusk and Assistant Secretary of State Main (in 1963) went on public record with statements like:
The Soviets have their own self-developed technology and are not dependent on U.S. technology. (Rusk)
These statements were nonsense, and directly opposed to the massive evidence in the State Department Decimal File. It took this writer three massive volumes to show the falsity. We then privately and quietly produced a fourth volume to show that the Soviets also depended on us for military technology as well. (National Suicide, 1974) — so privately that the book was on the street before the CIA picked up the news. When we refused to withdraw the volume, we were fired at a momentous meeting in August 1973.
The argument that we were killing our own men by shipping U.S. technology to the Soviets and Vietnam had no effect on the assembled CIA, FBI and academics. They had their orders. The Masters knew they were wrong, and wanted to avoid embarrassment and public exposure. A few, like Zbigniew Brzezinski and Richard Pipes, took our side, but were soon quieted. It took Casey and the CIA ten years to quietly repeat our work and find we were correct.
After this, we took nothing out of Washington at face value.
In brief, there is no sure thing about free energy. Wouldn’t the government just love to gain control or make a deal and tax it? — and don’t expect the truth.
Governments do a great job at making war, kicking their citizens around, especially those who make fundamental discoveries and maintain the status quo for their favored friends. They also do a great job at conning citizens.
Apart from this, politicians and bureaucrats have one aim: to keep on the government payroll, which they do very well! And if real ambitious, they want a freeway or building after their name. The welfare of citizens is very much secondary. Don’t expect any change.
Look for legal theft; and as Hegel said, this must benefit the Masters. It is their right, and our duty is to go along, and if we behave, get some scraps. Huh!
October’s FTIR was written and in for typing before the World Trade Center attack.
Note:
a. We are intrigued that only the name Osama bin Laden (a CIA creation) is cited as a suspect. The media is totally absorbed with this one name. No other considered.
b. Bin Laden has been in terrorism for a decade and known to be a factor in all kinds of terrorist acts. Why wasn’t he picked up before this? Journalists were able to locate and meet with him in Afghanistan, but not the U.S. government? We spend $30 billion a year on intelligence, and get hit by a massive surprise attack?
c. We suspect bin Laden was protected by certain powerful Western interests, specifically the Saudis and the oil companies fearful of disrupting oil markets.
d. Is it possible that the U.S. knew the latest WTC attack was coming, and let it occur? Like the 1992 WTC attack (F.B.I. knew), or Pearl Harbor, or the U.S.S. Maine in 1898. Why? For the reasons in the above text.
e. This writer is not alone in distrusting anything that comes out of Washington. Depressing, but realistic.
November 2001: Vol 12, No. 11
1. The United States is a vast, wealthy, productive and intelligent country. The most successful society in all history. Above all, it has a working Constitution with the all-important separation of powers, a full-time restraint on the excesses of politics and government. Remember, the office of President is not the same as the person who temporarily occupies the office. Without this separation, we could easily lapse into dictatorship.
2. The United States will recover from September 11, while mourning the loss of 3,000 citizens. It will do this with some loss of Constitutional rights. Proposals for ID cards, “roving wiretaps” and other devices from A/G Ashcroft are unnecessary — a hasty over-reaction to the situation. Quite rightly, these proposals are viewed suspiciously.
3. The U.S. took a hit. It will have to take some more hits. The response should be calm and reasoned, not hasty and emotional. But, above all, we need some explanations from Washington, D.C.
We need to know why this happened. The Presidential talk about evil and “America under attack” is ridiculous. Why do these people hate America so much? What have the government and the multi-nationals done to achieve this level of enmity? Why has Washington suppressed free energy development? We don’t need Saudi Arabia or the other oil producers; we need open-mindedness in Washington.
Even further, we spend $30 billion a year on intelligence, yet no advance warning, and no action! This strains our credulity. The hijackers came into this country in mid summer, and were recorded on the CIA “terrorist watch list” as “terrorists.” The ball stopped right there. The White House was informed. The people doing the watching did that and no more. They watched while terrorists were allowed to take no-landing flight training and do their planning in peace and quiet. It appears to us the operation was “allowed to go forward” — a scenario we have not seen discussed in the media. How can you spend $30 billion a year on intelligence, and ignore 19 known terrorists? We know the CIA informed the White House. No one said, “stop them.”
This reminds us of a similar snafu in the 1960s. The CIA said it did not know that the U. S. had built the Soviet Union. Nothing has changed. Either we have the most unintelligent of intelligence agencies, throwing money at useless SIGNIT systems, or somebody has another agenda out there — and the power to order “don’t do anything.”
With hundreds of billions a year spent on defense, four planes are able to sneak in and bring down two landmark buildings and hit the Pentagon without triggering defenses. This is incredible. A complete collapse of defenses. We need a full and documented answer. How much was known and when? This put-off of “revealing our intelligence sources” is plain silly. We have no intelligence if we can’t use it — period! To us, it looks very much like the Washington action pre-Pearl Harbor in 1941. Roosevelt had the Japanese code messages and allowed the attack to occur.
This is also a repeat of the collapse of U.S. intelligence in the technical “perceptions problem” with the Soviets. The U.S. never did figure out the technical weakness of the Soviet Union or chose to ignore the weaknesses. If you read, Best Enemy Money Can Buy, you will see how the U.S. was assaulted by an army of disinformation. From Secretary of State Dean Rusk and his deputy Edwin Martin, who had an arsenal of absurdities presented as hard fact, to Armand Hammer, son of founder of the Communist party, U.S.A., and access to every president from Roosevelt onwards; to naive academics like Walt Rostow; to businessmen like Norris (Control Data).
In Iran Contra, the U.S. became a major cocaine supplier, and this was approved from the Bush White House. Nothing ambivalent about that — Colonel Olly North was flat-out lying, and the system will not release the papers, so as to provide a cover for Olly — and to hell with the public.
In the 1993 WTC attack, the FBI had a man inside the operation. It was allowed to go forward.
We refuse to believe that Osama bin Laden woke up one morning and decided to attack next Tuesday at 9:00 A.M. This is a man who lives in a cave, for heavens’ sake!
What is his connection to the CIA? We are now set up for another whitewash, blue ribbon committee. There is a high probability that biological weapons will be used in jihad — cheap, portable, and sometimes effective. What is not discussed anywhere, probably not even in the Pentagon, is the use of radionics to counter pathogens.
The AMA-FDA complex has done an extraordinary job to eliminate knowledge and use of radionics in the U.S.A., an unbelievable disservice to humanity. And all for a few dollars’ profit! Biological weapons by definition have a life energy, and radionics is the manipulation of life energy. This can be reversed, if you know how.
Radionics, discovered in 1924 by a San Francisco doctor, Albert Abrams, was ruthlessly suppressed by the American Medical Association in its effort to monopolize American medicine.
In fact, radionics may be the ideal defense for biological warfare. Radionics can protect up to 1/2 square mile, but thanks to AMA greed and myopia, the U.S. has no usable radionic defense. Any system using life energy can be influenced by radionics. But neither life energy nor radionics is officially recognized in the United States. If anything is to be done, it will be by individual citizens.
We don’t believe that Al Queda cares what is officially recognized by the U.S. establishment. They have one question: does the United States have a defense?
The facts are extraordinary, but not surprising to those who follow government. There is a vaccine against anthrax — efficiency unknown. Only sufficient vaccine exists for the military. None is available for civilians. Antibiotics have very limited use.
Our personal view today is “sauve qui peut” — it is up to individual citizens to discover how they have been conned.
The Bush commentary — “bin Laden is an evil man...” and this is “a declaration of war,” is a sophomore-level retort to a crisis. We need explanatory answers to a host of questions, and so far, we have very little.
Did they know before 9:00 A.M. September 11?
Our information is, the White House knew on August 23, 2001, and had a list of the terrorists from CIA. We ask this because other Administrations have allowed attacks “to go forward” for political reasons. We can cite three or four such cases. The most well known is December, 1941, when Roosevelt had intercepts of the Japanese Pearl Harbor attack codes well beforehand, but allowed the attack to go forward to bring the U.S. into war. The code messages were forwarded to Hawaii by commercial routes, the slowest possible method. They arrived well after the attack.
In September, 2001, the entire New Utrecht High School in New York knew a week beforehand that the Twin Towers were to be attacked. (Journal News, October 11, 2001.) If a high school had advance warning, then someone in Washington must have had that same information.
We spend $30 billion a year on intelligence, and we are asked to believe no one in Washington had advance warning! Not impossible, but unlikely.
What are we doing? Well, we are still waiting for release of the Iran-Contra papers. Olly North was smuggling planeloads of cocaine into the U.S. under CIA auspices. This has been completely concealed by Congress. The Bush family supplied the oil rigs used as transit points for the cocaine. Very few know this today because Washington has clamped secrecy on the operation. In the early 1980s the U.S. Government was a major cocaine trafficker. Why? And why the continual denials in the face of operational documents?
www.judicialwatch.org
Bush, Sr. meets with the bin Laden family on business, while a son is the terrorist bin Laden. It would not look good for Bush to be associated with a terrorist family; so did they invent a dispute to suggest distance? Funds were flowing for years from the family to bin Laden — this suggests cooperation. If there is no evidence to confirm cooperation, why not publish the FBI conclusions from the bank records?
This is absurd. The Saudis are actively helping bin Laden — not the United States. Bush, Sr. has a business relationship with the bin Laden family. A constant stream of funds flows from Saudi businessmen to bin Laden. Saudi Intelligence is non-existent for the United States. We haven’t caught up with bin Laden in great part because he is protected by Saudis.
Saudi Arabia is not an ally. It is virtually an enemy. Bush, Jr. is not facing the situation — why not?
There were, in fact, several reports from foreign allies — all ignored. Why?
Incompetence in Washington, D.C.
The November 2000 FTIR one year ago headlined a warning: we are on the verge of disaster. FTIR identified the Middle East, terrorism and the heavy overhang of gold supply. The significance is this: Washington has a thousand times more information than FTIR. It lacks a capability to analyze and then act on information. The prediction of a gold overhang is important, because it meant that in the event of a crisis, gold would not behave in its normal manner. This is exactly what happened in September, 2001. Gold responded only sluggishly to the WTC events.
The reluctance of Government to act is a recurring problem. Where oil and the Middle East are concerned, the word is “do nothing to upset the oil companies.” As far back as 1985, we brought to the attention of the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board the emerging free energy paradigm. Our argument: We don’t need Saudi Arabia or any other oil producing country. Let’s get out while we can.
This was back in 1985! — and is on record.
December 2001: Vol 12, No. 12
The following comes from London (BBC) and Australia and needs further investigation.
U.S. agents (FBI) in London were pulled off an investigation of bin Laden family and Saudi royals soon after Bush took office. (BBC has documents to show this.) In addition to Osama bin Laden, other members of the family were terrorists and under investigation by FBI.
Intelligence agencies make a big deal out of secrecy. It makes them look important. Secrecy is sometimes needed to acquire information, and they paint a picture of clever CIA people acquiring secret documents.
In truth, this is nonsense. Almost all data can be acquired using ingenuity alone. For the four volumes of the Western Technology series, we acquired all the data needed without any skulking around, and that included the Russian technical manuals — hundreds of them — which came from inside the Soviet Union. What you do is ask for what you want, and have a reason ready.
The only problem I had was on some State {Department} documents. I had to jump up and down a little to get release. Then the reason for the trouble was obvious. State did not want public knowledge of the advanced systems the U.S. was shipping to the U.S.S.R.
This nonsense about the need for secrecy has two reasons:
1 . To conceal from the American public.
2. To make themselves look important, and keep the funds flowing from Congress.
About 5% of the material might be hard to obtain, but if you have Uncle Sam’s checkbook, that is no problem.
Don’t be confused by what I am saying: there have been, and maybe still are, some excellent CIA people. They will tell you that behind all the P.R. stuff, the real powers are (1) secret societies, and (2) drugs. But the bulk of CIA? — an expensive joke.
Congress is being fooled. And note this: the Chairman of the Intelligence Committee is Congressman Goss — a former CIA operative.
February 2002: Vol 13, No. 2
We have studied this event. Our suspicions were aroused at the time, and we now identify three areas where information and explanation are needed.
1. The precision, complexity, logistics and risk in this operation are way beyond the capability of any individual or group of individuals. Bin Laden, whatever his financial resources, does not have the technical resources of a state. There had to be a state entity involved, possibly in a covert partnership. Our short list of possible covert partners is:
United States, Great Britain, Saudi Arabia (very likely), Iraq, Iran, Israel
2. There is an interval of 75 minutes between the hijacking and alerting of the U.S. Air Force. Your choice is:
a. U.S. defenses were asleep, drinking coffee, or something else for 75 minutes.
b. Or - there was a deliberate delay, by official order — again, the state. At first, we thought it was inefficiency. Today, we are inclined to believe the WTC disaster was allowed to go forward.
3. The relations between the Bush family, bin Laden family, and the Saudi government. Of the 19 hijackers, 14 were Saudi.
F.B.I. Agent O’Neill has stated publicly he was blocked from investigation of the Saudi connection for political reasons. What political reasons are more important than investigation of the WTC destruction? This is supported by other information, confirming that Saudis are more deeply linked to Osama than has been stated, and Bush stopped the investigation — why?
In November, 2000 (that’s one year before the WTC disaster) FTIR warned of “troublesome times ahead” and pointed to the Middle East and to financial arenas.
This warning holds. However, the turbulence may be in the financial and economic sectors, rather than airplanes crashing into buildings. WTC-9/11 was a wake-up call.
We are particularly concerned about reports of F.B.I. agents being pulled off investigations relating to Saudi Arabia. Further, we keep getting rumors of Washington, DC elements up to no good, who want expansion of war under the name of antiterrorism.
For the worst case, make sure you have a stock of gold and silver coins. If you have energy stocks, take a close look at the future for oil, gas and nuclear energy.
Keep your heads up, and let your Congressmen know what you think!
A group in the Pentagon wants more war with Iraq — now. Pentagon facilities are being used to leak reports and arguments supporting this policy. It appears to be behind the back of Secretary Rumsfeld and originates in the office of Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz, who has no military experience.
This group has gone back over past Iraqi actions and thinks it has a case for moving on Iraq. We see this as irresponsible with extraordinary consequences for the Near East. This is typical of the arrogant policies which upset U.S. allies.
The CIA has a better idea (for once): use covert action on Baghdad. Secretary of State Colin Powell, a former head of the Joint Chiefs, is against a military action policy.
The WTC debacle altered many things, not all yet apparent.
An attack right into the heart of New York City, and this Editor, four months later, is still uncertain of the identify of the attackers!
All this under the guidance of a President with more secrets than the public realizes — some pretty sleazy.
The U.S. has embarked on a ten-year world crusade — in effect, a global war. This, at a time of a rapidly declining economy and shocking revelations of corporate misdoings in Enron.
There is more to come, much more. And this takes us well beyond the original topic of future technology.
Our original task has broadened. The government is on the way to take over free energy technology; fuel cells are just the start. And what Kenneth Lay did with Enron, with off-the-budget entities, which carried the debt load, is no more than the U.S. government has done for decades, with its off-budget financing.
This changes our focus.
As you see, we have already broadened our scope to include the all-important geopolitical factors, and this will get us back to the core of America’s Secret Establishment.
March 2002: Vol 13, No. 3
Former German Minister of Technology, Andreas von Buelow makes more sense than Bush and the White House on WTC and 9/11.
Von Buelow makes sense, but is almost totally ignored in the United States. He was the former Minister of Technology in Germany, an independent, sensible, down to earth thinker.
It is now nearly four months since 9/11, and according to general U.S. press articles, TV and radio reports, it is an unequivocal but unproven fact that the WTC event of 9/11 was the sole work of an evil madman — Osama bin Laden. Furthermore, we were promised an investigation, but all FBI investigative attempts have been blocked by the White House itself.
Then, conveniently, the Enron scandal emerged. Look at this: Enron has currently twelve Congressional investigations plus others on the board. The tragic event of WTC has none — zero.
Sure, Lay and his buddies ripped off millions, but someone was able to hijack four air planes, fly into New York landmark buildings, and kill a few thousand Americans. We spend billions of taxpayer dollars each year to stop this kind of thing — but our defenses spend 75 minutes drinking coffee!
Quite difficult to understand how a lone Arab who lives in a cave with four wives is able to bring about this stupendous act of cooperation, and our technical efficiency is not discussed or investigated! All we get in the U.S. is unsubstantiated lines about evil madmen!
But to the point, this gets no attention from Congress, only from a foreign statesman, while Lay and his fast-talking aides get twelve Congressional committees.
Our solution is simple: put Lay in jail, and put our effort into WTC - 9/11.
Something over 90% of Americans reportedly support Mr. Bush and accept his neurotic pleas without question; yet, overseas, some very important questions and investigations are in progress. At home, Enron commands all attention, while an extremely important interview of Andreas von Buelow appeared in the German daily, Tagesspiegel (January 13), with not one whisper in the U.S. And the topic is untouched, not only by the vast American Press, but also by Congressional investigators.
Here is one key point from von Buelow: “I can explain what’s bothering me: I see that after the horrifying attacks of Sept. 11, all political public opinion is being forced into a direction that I consider wrong.”
Some people in the U.S. feel the same way, but there is little coverage and few commentators even raise a hint that something is missing here.
Mr. von Buelow’s views are important, not only by virtue of his former position, but also because his views match a few publicized in the United States. FTIR and the La Rouche people have expressed skepticism about the official monopoly view. We sense that many others have unexpressed skepticism, confusing the office of the President with the contemporary office holder.
In your mind, go back and look at how Mr. Bush came to occupy this office — courtesy of Enron — and consider how he can raise over 90% approval on the basis of a PR campaign with no evidence to support the claim.
The level at which Bush discusses Osama bin Laden is sophomoric. This discussion of an evil, seemingly uncatchable Osama is becoming ridiculous.
We need some solid answers to some solid questions, and we are not getting them. To remind you, 3000 citizens get wiped out, and the limit of our knowledge is — evil madmen.
Then we have absurd CIA statements from CIA Director George J. Tenet that this event was a victory for the United States! — nonsense! WTC was no victory. But all we get is amateurish, unproven accusations and claims of victory. The next thing we know, we shall have victory parades on the White House lawn!
The establishment press is little better. Read the New York Times. It is big on “the hole” and heroism (and indeed, there were some heroic actions) but not much else.
This is an intelligent nation. It needs more than this. The White House sees the U.S. as a beer-drinking, SUV-driving, chauvinistic Andy Griffth’s Mayberry.
Something both vital and long overdue has happened in these United States — a deep-seated corruption is now emerging. We have to deal with it, not cover it up, else this country cannot survive.
The Enron case and Kenneth Lay are symptomatic. They reflect what some of us have long known. Basically, the problem stems from overwhelming greed in the political/economic system. Greed has brought Argentina to its knees, greed has brought Zimbabwe to the brink of starvation, and the results of greed over common good are all too obvious now in the United States and in the White House. Lay was the biggest subscriber to the Bush election, and also a major donor to Prince Charles in England — a mere $1.4 million for Charles. Lay was buying everyone who could be bought. The Russians adopted this anything goes philosophy at the Olympics — but too late in the day. They were caught!
We found this obeisance to corporate power in the Hoover Institution at Stanford University 30 years ago. We understand 3/4 of the Senate and perhaps 1/2 of the Congress have received donations from Kenneth Lay — all there, with their hands eagerly outstretched. So if an individual who has not bought his way into the game wants protection, it is not there.
Our personal case is the one we know best, and is very simple. Thirty years ago, we discovered something those in the industrial military establishment did not want you to know. We were told not to publish this by the Hoover Institution at Stanford. They even quietly went through the galleys of one of my books to pull out the material on military aid to the Russians. We refused to stay quiet, and wrote National Suicide and later The Best Enemy Money Can Buy. We published the whole dirty story.
We then found the Hoover Institution was maintained by private corporate donations, those who built the U.S.S.R. for profit — we found that our establishment actually built the Soviet Union while hypocritically claiming innocence. Just like Lay — “I know nothing.”
Instead of thanks for our discovery, the establishment threatened and blustered to save its own skin and reputation. People like Dean Rusk, Robert McNamara and Henry Kissinger lied and made sure enormous pressure was brought out to stop the story. Congress stood by and did nothing.
They did not succeed, but thanks to the gullibility — and perhaps the greed of the Congressman in the street — there was enough pressure brought to silence Congress.
Many years ago, after I would present a speech, scores would come up and make statements, “We are with you.” “God bless you.” But that was all. We often wondered why — why people would stop at that point, and never go beyond empty words. We decided fear was the best explanation.
The fear system works. Almost everyone is accountable to someone just upstairs — his or her boss. As former Senator Mike Mansfield said, “To get along, you have to go along.” But once you go along, you are committed. You have limited your own freedom of action.
What has happened is that many have limited their own freedom of action, and don’t really want the greed-reward system to stop, because it has paid off for them. They have sacrificed their own freedom for security. Hence, Kenneth Lay & Co. today!
The many crooks baited the hooks and caught a raft of greedy fish. There have been many exceptions, but not enough. Sherron Watkins blew the whistle on Enron, but has to face hostility from co-workers and friends. How many whistle-blowers consider it necessary to hide, as if in fear?
We have no fear of the establishment. We can produce more than their complicity in build-up of the Soviet Union. Our delay is for others to wake up and demand these people crawl back into their holes.
Maybe the time is coming. Perhaps Enron and Kenneth Lay have brought enough of this terrible mess into focus. Hoover Institution Director Glenn Campbell mocked us as being a moralist and said “you will not survive.” We have survived so far.
If you want to know this story, read Memoir and America’s Secret Establishment. Hopefully, you will be spurred to action — to destroy this monolithic corruption.
If you have silly ideas like rebellion — forget it. The solution is the mind and communication, that’s all. Violence is self destructive. First enlighten yourself, and then your friends.
And remember one piece of advice. “They” are the ones who are afraid, not you. Do right, and fear no man.
Mr. Bush needs to check his history books when he talks about an “axis of evil.”
For many, including most Europeans, “axis of evil” refers to the unholy alliance of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. Mr. Bush has invented a new axis — Iraq, Iran and North Korea. No matter that Iran and Iraq are enemies. No matter that Saudi Arabia is more and more apparently the seat of power for our problems. Fifteen of the nineteen hijackers were Saudi. The Saudi finance Al Queda and Saudis are highly uncooperative.
Why doesn’t Bush include Saudis? Politics again. Bush is buddy-buddy with Saudi Arabia for family and oil reasons, and refuses to see any evil in that direction.
Mr. Bush now has two major problems:
1. Get off the Osama kick, and tell us who was responsible for the World Trade Center bombing. “Condi” (Condoleezza. Rice, President George W. Bush’s National Security Advisor) should remind him that assumption is not proof.
2. His “axis” is pure fabrication. There is no “axis” among these countries, except in his own imagination for his own purposes.
More and more, Bush sounds like one of his fraternity buddies in Skull & Bones.
Now CIA Director George J. Tenet is claiming a victory for September 11th. That’s about as far as you can stretch imagination! Some three thousand Americans died on September 11, 2001, at the World Trade Center — and we would like to know why. Tenet claims it was a victory for the CIA, and they had known about Osama bin Laden for five years. FTIR readers will ask a simple question: Why wasn’t something done? Is it the CIA’s job just to look at terrorism, say, “My, my!” and go back to sleep?
Tenet is implying that in five years, the agency could not find a way into the Osama group. To FTIR, that is a blunt admission of failure. It is the job of intelligence agencies to find a way in. That is what “operations” does.
To add to Tenet’s advantages, the Bush family and many others have inside contacts with Saudi Arabia. No, Mr. Tenet — not victory, but downright failure. Excuses won’t do it. At $30 billion a year, we need more.
1. “There are 26 intelligence services in the U.S.A. with a budget of $30 billion (more than the total German defense budget) and they were not able to prevent the attacks.”
(FTIR has pointed out the same statistic. We now find the CIA knew 10 days before the attacks, and did nothing. This $30 billion is in addition to a secret budget we understand to be at around $70 billion.)
2. “Then the U.S. immediately went to war … but a Government which goes to war must first establish who the attacker, the enemy is. It has a duty to provide evidence, the U.S. has not been able to present any evidence that would hold up in court.”
(FTIR makes a similar point. Bush has made an assumption, he has not presented evidence.
3. “The assumed chief terrorist is Mohammed Atta. This presumed terrorist then took some unusual risks … and professionals do not take unusual risks. He catches a plane to reach Boston just a short time before the connecting flight. None of the stated terrorists was on the passenger list. None went through pre-flight procedures. None of the four pilots went to the agreed hijack code of 7700.”
April 2002: Vol 13, No. 4
Sometimes surprises hit when least expected. This is certainly true in research.
In February 2002, we had a letter from an international, award-winning New York film maker, Roland Legiardi-Laura, currently making a film on John Taylor Gatto, the New York City and State Teacher of the Year. The film is entitled The Fourth Purpose.
In making the film, Roland had noted references to our book, America’s Secret Establishment. These came from Gatto’s fourth book, Underground History of American Education. (In case you need it, Roland’s address is: The Odyssey Group, 269 East 8th Street, New York, NY 10009.)
Legiardi-Laura in particular had noted references in our book (a book he describes as “extraordinary”) to Thomas Gallaudet, founder of Gallaudet College (for the deaf) in Washington, DC. A book by Gallaudet has apparently been expurgated. We have a photo of the title page, which proves the book did indeed exist, but Legiardi-Laura was unable to obtain a copy for the film.
Legiardi-Laura mailed me a copy of Gatto’s book, and we found numerous references to a member of the Illuminati, a secret society, Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi (1746 - 1827), a close friend of Heinrich Hebart, the founder of so-called “enriched” education in the U.S. An odd combination. A Swiss Illuminati works closely and for some years lived with the American founder of the much-criticized domestic educational system in primary schools.
Legiardi-Laura achieved accidentally what so many have attempted. He found a way into the secret society octopus that threatens to extinguish our way of life.
This gives us an enormous research problem, and all we can do at the moment is present it to you. You are going to either solve it or let everything we have go to pieces. I cannot be any more clear than that.
What you cannot do is what happened 30 years ago when we discovered how the Soviet Union was built by the United States. People made all kind of supporting noises, but when it came down to doing something, they walked away and allowed a few to shoulder the burden. Then the Soviet Union collapsed. The Soviet chess piece was simply removed from the board, and today is replaced by “terrorism.”
For a number of reasons, this “I see nothing” evasion tactic is not going to work this time around. This time, you either do something, or believe me, you will go under. I can’t be any more blunt.
America’s Secret Establishment is based on a genuine membership list of Skull and Bones, which is tied in with the older Illuminati secret society. When viewed side by side with Gatto’s book, Underground History of American Education, a dramatic picture emerges.
Briefly, you have already been conditioned to accept secret society world control through the much-criticized educational system. Some of us have evaded this mechanism, because we did not receive our primary education in the United States. We evaded the conditioning. What we see clearly may not be available to you.
Remember, to achieve the Illuminati- Skull and Bones objective, they must conceal their intentions. The Illuminati were trapped in 1786, over 200 years ago, when the Elector of Bavaria intercepted their papers, found their objectives, and promptly broke up the Illuminati organization.
This is important. The Illuminati survived. Skull and Bones was founded in 1833, and has worked steadily since for its objectives. This is what Gatto has unknowingly discovered — a vital step in this plan for world domination. The President of the United States George W. Bush is a member of Skull and Bones.
As many parents have already found, the American primary education system has less to do with the development of the individual child, but rather prepares the child to be a cog in the State apparatus. This child conditioning can be looked at in two ways:
• First, the child is being raised as a tool of the State; barely able to read, and full of unnatural and non-educational ideas.
• But second, this conditioning can be viewed as a device to make a New World Order more acceptable. The kid grows up to be a pliant zombie.
This was not the Gatto objective. He started out by criticizing the educational objective. A teacher who was a real teacher, and objected to what is happening out there.
Because of the Pestalozzi aspect, we see this differently. We see a long-ranging conditioning objective to make the child accept these deeply secret objectives.
This is what the statistics portray. Just look at the literacy rate. Back 150 years ago, literacy was universal. Is it 100% in the U.S. today? Maybe 60% of the population can read! This is what we spend billions upon? — Something is wrong.
First let’s complete the Odyssey film on the educational system. This needs your help. This portrays a ridiculous affair. We spend billions — on what? — kids who can’t read? The pilot film, The Fourth Purpose, produced by the Odyssey Group is available.
We took a look at a typical school schedule. Have you done this? One school has a period every day for — DRUMMING! Five days a week for drumming! No history, no Constitution, no literature, no science — but drumming!
Our conclusion was, shut this place down fast. This is not a school; it’s an entertainment center.
This conditioning has been going on for well over 100 years. If it is not stopped, now, we shall have the entire population, except for immigrants, ready-made for the New World Order.
We have noticed that quite often the immigrant (there are 50 million of them) or the well-traveled American has evaded the conditioning. The vast group of younger Americans, those under 50 years of age, have been caught in the net.
Gatto and the Odyssey Group have caught this deeper purpose almost by accident.
Please think about this, and do what you can. You need to talk about this with your friends and relatives. You might see a note or review in a newsletter — that’s about the sum of it. Nothing will appear in your newspaper, since newspapers do not report until a topic is widely notorious, and certainly not if the proverbial “telephone call” comes in from the publisher, i.e., “do not report.” Some of you may remember 15 years ago, from time to time we received a report from a friend inside one of the major wire services: “News that isnot reported on the wires.”
We can only tell you what turns up in our research. As long as 40-50 years ago, we tried to tell people, for example, that the Soviet Union was not the almighty giant it appeared to the outside world. Our work was suppressed (see Memoir). Nobody would listen until we forced three books into the mainstream. Today, Mr. Gorbachev himself says the Soviet Union was a “propaganda hoax.” For some reason, people prefer the illusion to reality.
Think about this, please: we have a President who is a member of Skull & Bones. We have described Skull & Bones in detail in America’s Secret Establishment.
Our work is research. Whether you make use of the information is up to you.
From the start, FTIR has been skeptical of the Bush explanation of the WTC disaster. Our skepticism is based on logic and common sense, up to now without evidence.
We now have evidence, which more or less confirms what at least some have already deduced.
As we stated last month, times have changed; you ignore today at your own peril.
Our doubts based on common sense were:
1. Mr. Bush claimed the culprit as an evil bin Laden. Not one piece of evidence was submitted. Bush jumped up and down, pointing a finger at bin Laden, and, according to reports, convinced over 90% of the dumbed down American public without a shred of proof.
2. Congress has over twelve investigations for the Enron case — and NONE for the WTC case. Just as we went to press, two committees were appointed — the House committee has a narrow focus. Chairman is Congressman Porter Goss, former CIA operations! Senate Chairman is Joseph Lieberman, with a wider scope. Think about this. Is the death of 3,000 Americans so insignificant that it can be brushed under the rug? Do the misdeeds of Kenneth Lay warrant twelve investigations, and the deaths of nearly 3,000 innocent Americans warrant no investigation?
Our conclusion: Congress doesn’t want to investigate; maybe it fears some of the information below (and in following issues) is true, and will become public.
But Congress is supposed to represent the people!
3. After six months — no one can find Osama bin Laden, and Bush has stopped the FBI from investigation the Saudi angle.
4. And where is the press? This great big body of investigative journalists cannot even ask for proof of the Bush claim that Osama was to blame.
However: go to the Internet and you will find a different story. CNN and Rense.com (at: http://www.rense.com/generall9/formergerman.htm); print the passenger lists for the four planes involved in the World Trade Center disaster. (More specifically, we routinely checked for Arab names — there are none (one possible). However, the FBI has given us Arab names for the hijackers without aliases. These names are not on any passenger manifest we have seen. What is the reason for this contradiction?
There is much more proof of an alternative explanation. The four American planes were hijacked by NORAD — i.e., U.S. Air Force, using remote control technology designed to rescue hijacked planes — not to fly them into buildings. This is the story coming out of Britain and Germany.
Is this why Britain — always a stout U.S. ally — refused to send 25,000 troops to Afghanistan? Is this why Germany refused to take over peace keeping in Kabul after Britain exits?
We will give you references next issue (June) where you can read the full version for yourself. Some of the references are not something we would rely on; they will need checking. You can read and decide for yourself.
When you pick yourself up off the floor, you will need to contact your Congressman, your local news editor, General Myers at NORAD, any honest newsletter editors you know, and others involved in this affair.
There are rumors this information will be expurgated. What you do after that is your business. From our perspective, we trust none of the above.
Approximately 10,000 people, probably a lot more, know this story, and we are skeptical of a variant — the Chinese version. Their interest is to destabilize the U.S.
Our starting point is:
1. You are not fully dumbed down.
2. Washington is unwilling to tell you the truth.
3. We pick up rumors that this same Washington is frightened that you will somehow learn the truth.
4. Many of you will download the story from Rense.com .
We start with the passenger lists from the four hijacked planes. Much more to come!
Sooner or later, we had to reach this point. Many, many are aware that the world has changed, but at FTIR, we see no signs that any are aware that knowing is not enough. You have to do something. Probably the United States of America has had it so good for so long, it is difficult to adjust.
We were burning many of our papers the other day, and the thought occurred — this is what Embassies do when war is imminent! The smoke from the chimney tells outsiders the end is approaching.
We first warned in November, 2000. September 11th, 2001, should have been another warning, and Washington over the past six months is confirmation. Our warnings have no effect. Congress is allowed to go six months without an investigation of September 11th. Allies are making their warning noises — they are not happy. When Britain refused to send 25,000 troops to Afghanistan, that should have been warning enough.
Rather than ignoring your Congressmen, you should be demanding answers from him about WTC — this is your representative, for heaven’s sakes.
We can see the disintegration, but we do not see any part of the American people in protest. Everybody seems happy enough. Perhaps they do not see that “smiling fascism” can turn quickly to the real thing. Perhaps they do not recognize how the game is being played out in the military tribunals, the clamor for universal ID, and a lot worse. It is entirely possible that September 11th had nothing to do with Arabs, and a lot to do with NORAD.
Clearly worrisome is the fact that a former German Minister of Defense has picked up on this track, and clearly warns about it. Our other information confirms von Buelow. Von Buelow tells us that the U.S. is following the same track as 1930s Germany. People would just not believe what was happening.
Who was financing the German Nazi revolt of the 1930s? None other than Averell Harriman (Democrat) and Prescott Bush (Republican) through Union Banking, both Bonesmen, and Prescott Bush was the grandfather of today’s George W. Bush — also a Yale Bonesman.
Same thing today. The counter-moves are not being made by citizens. Sure, a dozen or so commentators, especially on the Internet, are warning you. And FTIR was surprised to see a jump in renewals — so you are not all asleep.
But who is getting Congress on the ball? Who is writing to the Editor? Who is distributing literature?
If you have not read America’s Secret Establishment, I urge you to do so. Published 20 years ago. And read “Electronically Hijacking the WTC Attack Aircraft,” at: http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/war/homerun.htm
Wake up and smell the coffee!
It looks as though they are willing to kill 3,000 Americans to advance their program. If that doesn’t tell you something, nothing will. Take a look at the Internet, rense.com and Orlin Grabbe.
The next issue of FTIR will be June 2002; we are going to a bi-monthly schedule. Your subscriptions will be filled, except you have twice as long to read each issue.
This was Tony’s last newsletter.
Vol 2 No 9 November 1983
The bland self-effacing mask of Vice-President George Herbert Walker Bush conceals another man from another world.
The Bush family — and several allied families — are at the core of a secret society known as The Order. They are sworn to conceal its objectives. Even its very existence.
Three in the Bush family are members. Here is an extract from the membership “Catalogue” of this secret society listing the “Bush” entries.
BUSH, ‘48, George Herbert Walker-Grove Lane, Greenwich, Conn.
BUSH, ‘22, James Smith-( Finance-Industrial Bank of St. Louis, 901 Washington Ave., St. Louis, Mo.; res., 5125 Lindell Blvd., Sgt., S.A.T.C., World War 1; Lt. Col., U.S.A.A.F., World War 11.
BUSH, ‘17, Prescott Sheldon-( Finance-59 Wall St., New York City; res., Grove Lane, Greenwich, Conn. Member, Yale Corporation, 1944-; Capt., F.A., World War I (A.E.F.).
Prescott Sheldon Bush, father of Vice-President George Herbert Walker Bush, was initiated into The Order in 1917 along with Henry Neil Mallon, founder of Dresser Industries (an important supplier of strategic high technology to the Soviets).
After graduation from Yale both Prescott Bush and Henry Mallon were commissioned into the U.S. Army, Field Artillery.
As instant Captains, they were assigned (or perhaps rewarded) regiments as follows:
Captain Prescott Bush322d Regiment Field Artillery
Captain Henry Mallon323d Regiment Field Artillery
Readers of Introduction to THE ORDER will recall that “322” and “323” are room numbers in the “Bones” Temple on the Yale campus.
After World War One Prescott Bush joined W.A. Harriman (now Brown Brothers, Harriman) private bankers at 59 Wall Street, New York, to start a forty-year career with the firm. Brothers Averell Harriman (‘13), Roland Noel Harriman (‘17) and members of the Brown family are also members of The Order.
In 1921 Bush married Dorothy Walker, daughter of St. Louis banker George Herbert Walker, whose son Stoughton Walker was initiated in 1928. Walker also hired James Smith Bush (initiated 1922), brother of Prescott Bush into his bank, the Industrial Bank of St. Louis.
In brief, the Bush family is part of the tightly woven inner core of The Order, a secret society whose members are sworn to avoid discussion of objectives and membership — or even its very existence.
George Bush was born June 12, 1924, in Milton, Massachusetts. His childhood was spent in Greenwich, Connecticut and Phillips Exeter Academy, Andover. During World War Two — and this is one of the few positive aspects of Bush’s career — he spent three years in the Pacific with Naval Air Services, leaving as a Lieutenant Junior Grade.
Then, according to Current Biography:
On his return to civilian life, Bush entered Yale University where he majored in economics, was elected to Phi Beta Kappa and joined Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity.
Nowhere in this biography — nor in any other Bush biography — is initiation into the order cited. Membership is consistently concealed from the public record.
Moreover, suppression of this membership is consistent with the oath of initiation which forbids members to discuss membership or even be present when The Order is discussed by outsiders.
After Yale, Bush decided to go to work. According to Current Biography:
After graduating from Yale … Bush decided to strike out on his own rather than work for his father’s banking firm (Brown Brothers, Harriman) and took a job as a salesman with Dresser Industries of Odessa, Texas, an oilfield supply company of which his father was a director.
One interesting point about Dresser Industries: it has always been a supplier of top flight high technology to the Soviets — some with more than obvious military applications. Even President Carter — who was actually tougher on holding the technological export line than President Reagan — allowed a Dresser-Soviet contract to go forward in 1977 against the protests of the Department of Defense.
In 1970 Bush ran for the U.S. Senate from Texas. He lost.
President Nixon then appointed Bush U.S. Ambassador to United Nations.
This appointment was widely criticized as a political pay-off-because Bush had absolutely no experience whatsoever in foreign affairs or diplomacy.
This deficiency led to expulsion of Taiwan from the U.N. General Assembly and a seat for Communist China.
Simultaneously Bush used his U.N. office to support “Mundialization,” i.e., the adoption by individual communities of world status. Part of local taxes goes to support United Nations rather than the local community. It is a rejection of U.S. sovereignty.
The first U.S. city to join the New World Order was Richfield, Ohio (November 1970). Here’s part of a letter sent by U.N. Ambassador Bush to Richfield, Ohio:
Permit me to congratulate you and the other members of your community on your Proclamation of Mundialization. There cannot be anything more encouraging to us here than to hear from a community like yours that supports the United Nations and believes in it and in its importance to the establishment of world peace. Equally significant is your community’s commitment to help increase understanding among the peoples of the world for without that understanding peace among peoples can never be achieved. What a profound contribution Richfield is making to man’s greatest efforts to build a world in which all the pledges of the UN Charter will truly govern relations among nations!
Mr. Bush had sworn an oath of office to support the Constitution of the United States. He cannot support any measure that would in any way dilute the sovereignty of the United States. The “Mundialization” process and the Constitution of the U.S. are opposed to each other. They are mutually exclusive. You have to choose one or the other. You can’t support both simultaneously.
After this Bush was moved along the fast track by Nixon and Ford:
1971-2 U.S. Ambassador to United Nations
1973-4 Chairman Republican National Committee
1974-5 Chief U.S. Liaison Office, Peking, Communist China
1976-7 Director, Central Intelligence Agency
In 1980 Bush ran for President. Financial backing came heavily from the so-called Eastern Establishment-not only did David Rockefeller send the maximum allowable contribution of $1,000, but so did five other Rockefellers.
Among members of The Order who backed Bush were:
J. Richardson Dilworth (‘38)
(Administrator of the Rockefeller family) $1000
John Cowles, Jr. (four Cowles in The Order) $1000
George Weyerhaeuser $1000
As you know, Bush ended up on the Presidential ticket with Reagan — and made it into the White House.
The October 1983 Phoenix Letter reported that individual Americans have met with Andropov only twice. And Andropov chose to meet members of The Order: Bush and Harriman. Not even U.S. Ambassador Hartman has seen Andropov alone.
What was Bush’s assessment after the November 1982 meeting? This is Bush — a former head of CIA — on Andropov:
My view on Andropov is that some people make this KGB thing sound horrendous. Maybe I speak defensively as a former head of CIA. But leave out the naughty things they allegedly do: here’s a man who has had access to a tremendous amount of intelligence over the years … (and therefore) would be less apt to misread the intentions of the United States.
The Bush assessment was that Andropov was misunderstood and really wanted to improve U.S.-Soviet relations.
And what did Phoenix Letter print at that time (January 1983 The Russian Window)? As follows:
Andropov is by far the most dangerous Soviet leader since the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution.
Andropov has more education than Lenin, and probably equals Lenin’s cunning. Andropov is as ruthless as Stalin, but this ruthlessness will be directed as much at the Free World as long suffering Russians. In the light of history Kruschev and Brezhnev will be seen as toothless tigers compared to the Andropov regime. In brief: KGB efficiency and terror will now be felt inside and outside Russia.
The “poor misunderstood” Andropov acted — in quick succession came these terror strikes:
The attempted assassination of the Pope, traced back to Moscow,
The massacre of KAL 007,
The massacre of the South Korean cabinet in Bangkok,
The Beirut Marine massacre,
The Cuban-Soviet buildup on Grenada — aimed at revolution in Brazil.
Bush boasts he spent a year as head of CIA. He should buy a subscription to The Phoenix Letter — then his assessment of intentions will be 100% more accurate.
After meeting with Andropov in November, 1982, Bush went on down to see Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe and made a speech not exactly well covered by the U.S. media (it was not reported by any network or major newspaper). Reading extracts from the speech Bush made in Harare (capital of Zimbabwe) readers will understand why Bush may not have been anxious for domestic U.S. coverage of his views on Zimbabwe.
Back in May of this year we reported that Robert Mugabe was engaged in a quiet slaughter of his tribal enemies in Zimbabwe … while the U.S. was financing Zimbabwean housing projects at lower interest rates than could be obtained by American citizens.
We described Mugabe as: “ … a smooth two-faced killer, who sneers when atrocities are mentioned and has conned the local U.S. representatives” (May 1983 p. 8).
While the slaughter was in progress Vice President Bush was in Zimbabwe-not to investigate the slaughter, but to hail Mugabe. Here are some of the fawning statements made by Bush at a State Dinner held in Harare, Zimbabwe on November 16, 1982:
Your excellency … thirty-one hours ago in Moscow, I discussed my mission to Africa with the President of Pakistan, Zia Al-Huk. When I mentioned Prime Minister Mugabe, President Zia made reference to something which informed men everywhere on earth agree …. I want to acknowledge that I stand in the presence of a genuine statesman, the Prime Minister of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe. His stature in the world is well established, highly respected, and it will be more formidable in the years to come ….
And more,
Mr. Prime Minister … you have faced awesome challenges … I do want to say on behalf of the Reagan Administration that we support the policy of reconciliation to which you have committed yourself … We have supported your country because its success is consistent with U.S. principles and U.S. interests … shortly after President Reagan took office my government pledged nearly one quarter of a billion U.S. dollars in new aid. America has not only avowed its faith in Zimbabwe, but proven it.
Finally, Bush couldn’t resist commenting on his response to Andropov’s sucker bait:
A moment ago I mentioned our journey to Moscow. No doubt you have all seen photographs of Secretary Brezhnev’s funeral. The image that struck me most — one that I will never forget — was the magnificent, stately display of young Russian soldiers.
And there’s more of the same preppie gee-whiz juvenile ramblings … this is the Vice President of the United States — once they let him outside the U.S.
Now let’s come up to date — to November 1, 1983, a few days before we go to press.
Over in Harare, statesman Robert Mugabe has seized and imprisoned Bishop Abel Muzorewa of the American-based United Methodist Church.
What is Bishop Muzorewa’s sin?
Two days before Mugabe stormtroopers seized the bishop, Muzorewa made a comment that human oppression in Zimbabwe was worse than under white minority rule (Zimbabwe was formerly Rhodesia). This is how Bishop Muzorewa phrased his criticism of Mugabe:
I continue to hope and pray that God can somehow help us to be delivered from the oppression of today imposed on us not by Ian Smith, not by Israel or South Africa and not by people with white skins, but by our ruling party and government with black skins.
Bishop Muzorewa is today held in Harare Central Police Station. Muzorewa has not been formally charged with a crime. He cannot receive visitors or a lawyer.
And the man responsible is Vice President Bush’s hero — distinguished statesman Mugabe — who is getting a one quarter billion dollar hand-out this year from the United States taxpayer.
1.Mr. Bush is a member of a “sordid” secret society (that’s what one of its own members has called it). This membership has been concealed from the American public. It is obvious deception.
2.Mr. Bush apparently has some difficulty in making correct assessments of people and events. Anyone who provides rapturous support for such psychopaths as Andropov and Mugabe has little understanding of traditional American values of freedom and human dignity.
3.These deficiencies have been identified by Andropov. Soviet psychological profiles of Bush are accurate. Bush apparently cannot restrain himself from reaction. Diplomatic precedence and goose-stepping military parades are two Bush baits which have succeeded.
4.Bush’s actions confirm the conclusion of INTRODUCTION TO THE ORDER, i.e., that members of The Order have severe personality deficiencies.
1.That Vice-President Bush resign — today — before these facts become general public knowledge and rebound on the Reagan administration.
Vol 2 No 12 February 1984
The stupidity of political sinners never ceases to amaze us.
Surely there must be one lesson from the Nixon White House — that cover-ups just don’t work — that the public will accept a political sinner but not one who conceals his sinning.
P-T “Poppy” Bush (D. 146) is scrambling to hide a sordid segment of his life — his involvement with B---s, his membership in The Order.
(If you’re wondering whether our typist is taking shortcuts with words, the answer is no — they know that P-T, D.146 and B---s stand for — it’s a code they use in letters between members. Key: P-T is “Patriarch,” D. 146 is a date of initiation and B --- s is “Bones”).
Back to Patriarch “Poppy” Bush (alias Vice President George Herbert Walker Bush), in the November 1983 issue of The Phoenix Letter we printed an extract from the “Catalogue” of the-Russell Trust (a.k.a. Skull & Bones, a.k.a. The Order). This extract of the Bush family included Vice President Bush.
Within days we picked up the first of three events pointing to a cover-up:
(a)November 14, 1983, The Yale University Library denied researchers further access to Kingsley Trust and Russell Trust papers.
(b)December 13, 1983, Vice President Bush denied membership in a “sordid secret society.”
(c)January 16, 1984, the White House cancelled the Republican regional platform hearings — a long-time GOP tradition.
Mr. Bush is on the spot.
We have proof — absolutely irrefutable documentary proof-that Vice President Bush (as you know him) is a member of The Order.
On the other hand, members take an oath not to discuss membership. Even in letters between members, the entity “The Order” is coded in symbols.
Vice President Bush now has a choice — deny membership and so lie to the American people and betray his oath of office — or he can tell the truth, admit membership and betray The Order.
At this time Patriarch Bush has opted to deny membership.
In November 1983, a Phoenix Letter reader wrote the Vice President, requesting him to respond to the charges made in The Phoenix Letter. We will print two extracts from the reader’s letter (it’s too long to reproduce in full), then the Bush reply, then our comments (the complete Bush letter is reproduced on the next page).
(1) Reader To Bush:
Are you now-or have you ever been — a member of and/or in any way affiliated with the alleged secret society cited by Mr. Sutton, also known as The Order?
Vice President Bush:
“The Vice-President is not now and never has been a member of any ‘sordid secret society’” (see full context opposite).
Comment:
Mr. Bush attempts to duck the question by inserting a word, i.e., “sordid.” The letter is signed by Shirley Green, Acting Press Secretary, so the letter can always be denied. Obviously Vice President Bush is not in a position to make an outright denial.
(2) Reader To Bush:
“Has Mr. Sutton accurately stated and/or quoted your position with regard to Soviet Premier Andropov and Dictator Mugabe of Zimbabwe? If not, then I request that you send me complete transcripts of what you actually stated.”
Vice President Bush:
Bush ignores Mugabe. Neither did the Vice President fill the request for a full transcript. So Phoenix Letter sent a full transcript to the reader.
“Out of context and incomplete quotation” is the reason given for the Andropov part of the question, but no transcript was sent to the reader.
Comment:
None. Mr. Bush is obviously unable to support his allegations.
It is an iron clad rule among librarians throughout the civilized world that catalogue listed material should be freely available to all comers, without restricts, except where limitations on use are clearly stated and approved (rare books for example).
This is a basic tenet of professional librarianship — in thirty years around the academic world we have never once known this rule violated.
Even Soviet libraries by and large keep to this rule. This editor’s three-volume study of Soviet technology relied heavily on Soviet material (the U. S. government classified its files on this topic) and even the paranoid Soviets were willing to ship abroad material listed in their Moscow catalogues.
Now let’s come to that bastion of free inquiry in New Haven, Connecticut, known as Yale University.
Last August (1983) this Editor requested Yale University Library for a copy of items in their Yale catalogue under Call Numbers: Yeg2 K61c (Kingsley Trust) and Yeg2 R9c (Russell Trust).
Here is a copy of a relevant catalog card — as it (once) existed — at Yale University Library:
The response denying access from the University Librarian is reproduced on the opposite page. The censor? Obviously Kingsley Trust. The Russell Trust request was ignored.
Who, or what, is Kingsley Trust? It is a.k.a. Scroll & Key-another Yale senior society. We suspect it is a part of, perhaps a chapter of The Order … members included Dean Acheson (NSC/68) and Cy Vance.
Note this: the requested material was open to researchers as late as mid-1983 because previous requests were fulfilled promptly. Access was closed off sometime between July and November 1983, after remaining available for years, some for almost a century.
Traditionally in election years the Republican Party holds nationwide public platform hearings.
This year, White House counselor Edwin Meese (in charge of writing the platform) and almost all Republican officials, legislators and Governors, wanted to continue the tradition.
The Bush-Baker forces said no. Said James Baker, “When you have the White House, why invite people to go out and criticize you.”
Then Trent Lott (R-Miss.) arranged a compromise — four hearings only. In January, even this compromise was scuttled by the Bush-Baker crowd.
We understand individual Republicans are now organizing hearings on a local basis — in addition to the orchestrated show at Dallas.
We also know from internal correspondence among members of The Order (between their local cells or clubs) that they are worried — worried about the anti-elitist tide, worried that even Yale campus doesn’t want them anymore.
Someone needs to come up with an idea — how to get Vice President Bush on a public platform before nationwide TV cameras to answer a few questions. For example:
“Are you or have ever been a member of a secret society?”
“Have you ever taken an oath to keep this membership secret?”
“Did you declare this secret membership to the FBI or the Senate when you were confirmed as Vice President?”
1.George “Poppy” Bush is not only a member of a secret society, but cannot deny this association.
2.Bush has placed himself behind a smoke screen, i.e., he answers questions through a press secretary (who can be denied), keeps a very low profile, refuses to give the public a forum for questioning.
3.In brief, a cover-up.
1.Mr. Bush should resign before he puts his other foot in it.
2.The Phoenix Letter would appreciate any recent (since 1960) Yale yearbooks that publish Scroll & Key associations. We can return “borrowed” material within 24 hours by overnight Express mail.
Do not assume ALL Yale graduates are suspect. That would be grossly untrue and unfair. We are talking about 15 men a year (the Yale 1945 entering class was 8,000). Not all those initiated became active. We are looking at 100 or so activists among 100,000 or so Yale graduates.
Vol 2 No 12 February 1984
Political conspiracy demands secrecy.
The Order (aka Skull & Bones or Russell Trust) will not comment on our charges.
The Order will not reply to letters. Members will not even admit membership
(Vice President Bush, a public official, will not admit or deny).
Now Scroll & Key (aka Kingsley Trust) has presented us with a useful start point to attack the silence.
A few months ago on January 29, 1985, Radley H. Daly, Treasurer of Kingsley Trust, wrote that senior society secrecy was not secrecy but privacy. We reproduce this letter overleaf.
Daly does not disclaim concealment of information nor deny activities. Daly merely makes a bland claim for privacy. It is this claim of a right to privacy that we want to explore.
Let’s go back 100 years: to the 1871 commentary on Yale senior societies by Lyman Bagg, FOUR YEARS AT YALE. The chapter on senior societies is reproduced in America’s Secret Establishment. On pages 84-5 we find the following:
… the senior societies are such peculiarly Yale institutions, that it will be difficult for an outsider fully to appreciate their significance. Nothing like them exists in other colleges; and Harvard is the only college where, under similar conditions, they possibly could exist. In the first place, they are the only Yale societies whose transactions are really secret. Their members never even mention their names, nor refer to them in any way, in the presence of anyone not of their own number and, as they are all Seniors, there are no old members in the class above them to tell tales out of school.
Bagg’s century-old observations are fully supported by subsequent ACTIONS.
A membership list for The Order — part of the Yale senior society system — is not freely available. If any reader wants to test this assertion, the address for The Order is:
Russell Trust Association
P. 0. Box 2138
Yale Station
New Haven, Conn 06520
Offer to pay Xeroxing costs and ask for:
CATALOGUE, Volume One: Living Members
CATALOGUE, Volume Two: Deceased Members
Volume One is 193 pages in length and Volume Two is 141 pages.
If any reader succeeds in obtaining a copy, we would appreciate the news. We can then release for publication the copy we are now holding. We are presently reluctant to reproduce our copy in case it can be traced to a source.
Radley Daly, of Scroll & Key, claims that membership lists were at one time published in newspapers. This is partially true. But nothing more than bare names of those initiated were ever published. All procedures and objectives are carefully guarded and always have been.
In the past few decades secrecy has been extended even to names — as Daly admits. Daly states publication was “discontinued a few years back.” In fact, it is almost a century since full lists were published to our knowledge, although we have not thoroughly researched this point.
The reason for non-publication presented by Daly is lack of newsworthiness. If it is newsworthiness alone, then why is it impossible to obtain a current list of members of Skull & Bones? Why is the catalogue treated as a state secret “For eye only.”
We suggest the true reason for concealment is the precise opposite, i.e., that the list is indeed highly newsworthy. A quick scan of the 1983 list reveals an extraordinary correlation between The Order and the “powers that be” in the United States.
Furthermore, we have begun to print evidence of collusion among members for specific objectives. So we reject Radley Daly’s argument out of hand.
Privacy becomes unacceptable secrecy when the power and influence of fraternities is used to harm society or individuals outside the fraternity.
We can cite The Brotherhood in England (See Phoenix Letter, May 1984, Vol. 3, No. 3). The KGB infiltrated the Freemasons and used the Masonic fraternal preference structure to work their way to the top of British intelligence. The KGB ended up in control of MI-6, thanks to Masonic “Privacy.” This, in spite of the fact that all British intelligence organizations refuse to recruit masons. (More recently this ban has been extended to Scotland Yard police.)
We have every right — and a civic duty-to demand that the Yale senior societies drop their protective shields and open up their records.
Even without the resources available to the FBI and Congress, we can print enough to demonstrate a prima facie case of illegal and possibly subversive actions.
Concealment of fraternal objectives is the key. Privacy is only guaranteed and acceptable in a free society if the privacy is used for legitimate ends.
Evidence is accumulating that Yale senior society power has been used for illegitimate ends. In The Phoenix Letter for December 1984, January and February 1985 we demonstrated — with only preliminary evidence — that the Yale senior society system has generated the architects of defeat in U.S. foreign policy. We demonstrated that members act jointly and consistently to the disadvantage of the United States.
Not only is membership concealed, but also objectives are concealed and members are under oath not to discuss membership or objectives.
We can deduce objectives from the actions of these blood brothers. Joint actions are the indicator and result of intentions. Joint actions are the proof of intentions.
Consider again, for example, the case of “The Brotherhood” in England as surfaced by Stephen Knight. The KGB infiltrated and manipulated British freemasonry to control British intelligence organizations. Yet British Freemasons claim a right to privacy. They are indeed entitled to privacy if their ends are legitimate and if they take precautions against misuse of privacy. But in England freemasonry was used for illegitimate ends. Privacy is used as a reason to hide perverted, illegal, socially harmful actions totally unacceptable in a free society.
In three issues of the Phoenix Letter we outlined joint use of power in the United States by members of Yale senior societies. These actions were to the disadvantage of the United States. We have so far outlined only 8 events. In fact, we have — even at this early stage — another 20 events ready to lay before you, including control of the Manhattan Project, target selection in World War Two, the Alger Hiss case, and a wide range of other situations.
Given the British case and these 28 events, we are entitled to view Mr. Daly’s claim for privacy with extreme skepticism.
Not only can we demonstrate highly suspicious joint use of power, but also we have a situation where members are supposed to deny membership, membership lists are not published, and even Vice President Bush in writing will neither confirm nor deny membership. The “Temple” is not open to outsiders.
And we are supposed to accept this in the name of privacy?
The secret of The Order’s acquisition of power is the fraternal use of appointment.
Any member who acquires a position of power uses this position to appoint blood brothers. This preferential pattern of appointment starts on the Yale campus itself and has been the target of past Yale criticism. Priority in appointment appears to be:
(1)Blood brothers in Skull & Bones (Russell Trust)
(2)Members of Scroll & Key (Kingsley Trust) and Wolfs Head (Phelps Trust)
(3)Other Yale graduates — except that it is not enough to be just a Yale graduate. Under certain circumstances other Ivy League graduates or outsiders with specific qualifications have priority over Yale graduates.
4)Other Ivy League Universities, especially Harvard, Princeton and Johns Hopkins
(5)Families of (1) and (2) above
(6)Outsiders with specific qualifications
For example: President William Howard Taft (Club D. 76) appointed Franklin MacVeagh (Club D. 60) as his Secretary of Treasury and Henry Lewis Stimson (Club D. 86) as his Secretary of War.
In brief: Taft’s appointments were selected from category (1) above for two senior cabinet posts.
But Taft appointed Theodore Marburg, German born, (6) above, as U.S. Ambassador to Belgium. Why? In 1911 Marburg was the prime exponent of the League of Nations idea and used the Belgian post to push this concept. The League of Nations concept is an event we can trace to The Order and its associates.
Of even greater significance is the way The Order has tried to institutionalize its power of appointment: to remove power from the electorate.
The selective appointment device has a weakness: sooner or later it may be identified and public protest will neutralize the power.
Hence, we find attempts to lock in the power of preferential appointment.
Consider these facts:
Cord Meyer was founder of United World Federalists. Cord Meyer is on the Scroll & Key list.
President Eisenhower’s National Goals Commission had William P. Bundy (Club D. 137) as its director.
The Hutchins-Luce Freedom of the Press Commission wanted to restrict the power of the press to inform. Henry Luce was Club D. 118 and Robert Hutchins was Phelps Trust.
These efforts came to a head with promotion of the “new Constitution.” Here’s how perpetuation of power almost came about in the 1960-1970 period:
Robert Maynard Hutchins (Phelps Trust) was Associate Director of the Ford Foundation, 1951-5. Ford Foundation established Fund for the Republic in 1954 and Hutchins became President. Fund for the Republic funded an outfit called Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions.
In the mid to late 1960s the Center got to work on the “new Constitution” and a member of The Order, McGeorge Bundy (Club D. 138), was President of the supporting Ford Foundation.
The Center’s prime objective was to draft a “model Constitution for contemporary America.”
Some of the provisions of this “new Constitution” follow: (taken from The Center Magazine, Volume III, No. 5, September/October 1970)
Power of the Presidency is modified and shifted to the Senate
Senators have lifetime tenure
Senators appointed, not elected
All enterprises regulated by a National Regulator
The present Bill of Rights is either omitted or carefully circumscribed
The final version of this dictatorial manifesto was published in Rexford G. Tugwell, The Emerging Constitution (Harper & Rowe, 1974).
Current attempts to introduce the new “Constitution” through the back door include:
Creation of 10 Federal Regions, equal to the ten “new States”
A call to expand the Presidential term to nine years
They plan for a Constitutional Convention in 1987. George Bush (D. 146) will be President of the Convention.
The vast majority of people look at events and activities as disconnected and independent. For most people the effort to establish a “new constitution” in 1970 has no connection with, for example, President Taft’s cabinet appointments in 1911 or the Hutchins-Luce Commission on Freedom-of the Press, or the other 28 major events we have identified.
However, if one finds a common thread linking seemingly different events, people and activities, the viewpoint changes. This generates a search for other common links between the same people and events.
The common link or thread in 28 events (so far) is membership in Yale secret societies: Russell Trust, Kingsley Trust and Phelps Trust. Control or manipulation of these events and activities was in the hands of members of one or more of these trusts.
It is this common thread, a binding link, that secrecy keeps from public view. When you look at these events and activities from the viewpoint of secret fraternal organizations, the perspective changes.
Privacy then becomes unacceptable secrecy. Privacy becomes a device for manipulation of a free society. And if any reader doubts this can be done, please read Stephen Knight’s The Brotherhood (Granada Press, 1984).
1. Radley Daly, Treasurer of Scroll & Key, claims a right to privacy for Yale senior societies.
2. We have introduced evidence that privacy has been used as a device to conceal joint activities to manipulate a free society.
3. Therefore the claim for privacy is rejected. Honest members of Yale senior societies — and they exist — should demand publication of all practices, traditions and “secrets.”
1. The network expands slowly but quite surely. A structure has evolved in which individuals work on specific projects in their own time at their own pace. Research results are coordinated with Landkamer, who makes them available to other interested parties.
2. Information is required on the following points:
(a) The Identity Church
(b) An alleged CIA operation entitled “Earl of Dysart”
(c) Names of Yale senior society members that have come up in connection with the Kennedy assassination, the Warren Commission and the Rockefeller Commission
The Order And “Look Alikes”
Out of nowhere, in the last 12 months around the U.S., we find media stories about alleged criminal groups called The Order.
The media has given major space to these groups, but none to The Order as publicized in the Phoenix Letter.
Even more fascinating, we have received letters from prisoners in Federal Penitentiaries inquiring about The Order. So far, Federal prisons in California, Kansas, Texas and Alabama are represented in this unsolicited and unexpected prison mail.
There is no connection between The Order as publicized so far in the media and The Order described in the Phoenix Letter.
Vol 7 No 3 May 1988
Vice President Bush is, as you know, a member of the super-secret Yale Skull & Bones. The following is from Newsweek On Campus (April 1988, page 17): “All references to Yale’s 156-year-old Skull & Bones, which considers itself the ultimate secret society, are torn out of the card catalogs at the college library, and magazine articles about the group have been ripped from bound volumes. Those nosing around the Skull and Bones tomb may be followed or even threatened.”
We can confirm the Newsweek reports of threats from our own sources. But what Newsweek doesn’t know is that this makes investigators all the more curious and stubborn. Many seem to end up contacting us because we duplicated the Yale Library files many years ago. We are happy to make this suppressed information available to genuine researchers.
Personal note for Lee Atwood and Skull & Bones thugs, the files are duplicated, scattered and far distant from Arizona and California. Note for Yale Library: please reread the American Library Association regulations on suppressing materials. Thank you.
Vol 8 No 12 December 1989
Sudden flurry of articles on Skull and Bones in establishment media … picking up from where this editor left off in Americas Secret Establishment.
Louisville Courier-Journal (Magazine section Sunday, October 8, 1989) “The Bonesmen’s Bond” with a subtitle “Presidents, Poets, Pundits and Pinkos have sworn allegiance to Skull and Bones, Yale’s rich and powerful secret society, and the most exclusive college club of all. So what’s all that Nazi stuff doing in the clubhouse?” Written by Steven M.L. Aronson.
Aronson charges that a room in the Bones Temple is “a little Nazi shrine inside, one room on the second floor has a bunch of swastikas, kind of an SS macho Nazi iconography.”
Aronson forgets to mention that President Bush is (and his father was) in Skull and Bones.
The New Haven Advocate (New Haven is the home town of Yale and Skull and Bones).
The front page article in the October 19, 1989 issue is headed: “Bones of contention: skullduggery at Yale” by Howard Altman.
It’s an extraordinary story — the Skull and Bones Temple at Yale is illegally holding the skull of Apache Chief Geronimo … stolen from the grave by Senator Prescott Bush, father of President Bush, and other Bonesmen.
The Apaches want the skull back … and under Connecticut law (Section 53-334 of Offenses Against Public Policy and Title 45-253 of the State Probate Law) the holding of human remains is illegal.
New Haven lawyers, according to Altman, are reluctant to sue or press for a civil or criminal complaint because of the power of Skull and Bones, to which we say “wait a minute, this isn’t Russia” … the local prosecutor has a duty to prosecute if the evidence is credible. After all we live under the rule of law and that includes Presidents. If Mr. Bush is accessory to a criminal offense, apparently compounded by satanism, he has to be brought to the bar of justice. In this case George Herbart Walker Bush is apparently not implicated directly except that he would have knowledge of illegal actions — which is indeed an offense.
[Other news sources please copy and give this charge some public exposure.]
The Altman article also cites a book, a history of Skull and Bones written in 1933 entitled The Continuation of the History of Our Order for the Century Celebration. Compiled by F.O. Matthieson. [Altman does not state that Matthieson was a prominent Marxist and a link between the old line Communists of the 1930’s and the new progressives of the 1960’s.]
If any reader can locate a copy of this book we will arrange for reprinting.
In any event:
(1)We now have clues that President Bush may be tied to satanic practices. This was a segment included in our America’s Secret Establishment.
(2)We also have links between Skull and Bones and Naziism.
If you have read Trevor Ravenscroft Sword of Destiny … you will immediately appreciate the significance. We suspect more information will surface in coming years.
*
*
