adaptive trial design, 213–215
Africans, 128
aging, 33
Akey, Joshua, 128, 129, 184–186
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 180
Alkhateeb, Ahmed, 231
ALS (aka Lou Gehrig’s disease or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), 2, 82, 155–156
ALS experimental design, 53–63
animal model as valid surrogate for human disease and, 68–69
animal studies vs. human drug trials and, 54, 55–57, 58–59
drug development, 62
grant application guidelines, 60–62
ALS TDI. See ALS Therapy Development Institute
ALS Therapy Development Institute (ALS TDI), 55–56, 61–63, 68
Alzheimer’s disease, 1, 2, 11, 42, 82, 83
American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 16
American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 105
American Statistical Association, 138
American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 98, 103, 106, 107
Amgen, 7–9, 16, 26, 39, 40, 116
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. See ALS
anatomic pathologists, 200–201. See also pathologists
anesthesia, 198
animal model, as valid surrogate for human disease, 68–69
animal-research guidelines, 233
drug development and, 91
drug testing and reliance on mice in, 74–79
drug-toxicity tests and, 72–73
drugs for hepatitis B and, 71–72
elimination of variables and, 79–80
failure rates, 81
vs. human drug trials, 54, 55–57, 58–59, 71–72, 77
induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells in place of, 83–84
laboratory vs. wild mice in, 78–79
for neurological disease as irrelevant, 82–83
number of animals used in, 73–74
antibody testing, 232
gene-editing technology and, 120–121
improving the quality of, 118–122
index array slides and, 119
irisin for weight loss and, 116–118
misleading results from, 112–118
reproducibility and, 122
anticancer drugs, 51–52, 89, 109, 199
Aristotle, 30
Arizona State University, 21, 199, 212–213, 235
ARRIVE guidelines, 233
arthritis, 142
ASCB. See American Society for Cell Biology
Asia, 178
aspirin, 73
asthma, 132
AstraZeneca, 75
ATCC, 107
autism, 84
bacterial genes, 152
bad science, natural selection of, 188
badges, 232
Baggerly, Keith, 123–125, 126–127, 129–130
Barker, Anna, 21–22, 201–203, 213–215
batch effect, 125, 126–130, 184–185
cancer research and, 201
study of reproducibility failures, 59–60
Begley, C. Glenn, 7–10, 12–13, 14, 25–27, 39, 40, 60, 116, 157–158, 220, 227–228
Belgium, 106
bias
Biden, Beau, 19
Biden, Joe, 19
big data, 130–133, 196. See also data analysis; data sharing
biologicals, 91
biology, 31, 34–35, 36, 38, 130
as quantitative, 203
from small studies to big data and, 196
biomarker validation, 210–213, 211–212
costs, 212
reproducibility and, 211
biomedical research
acknowledgment of problems in, 3–4
analysis (see data analysis)
animal-research guidelines, 233
ARRIVE guidelines, 233
competition for postdoctoral academic, 173–174
confirmatory vs. exploratory, 140–141, 145, 147
data-driven medicine and, 218–221
drugs and (see drugs/pharmaceuticals)
federal support for, 3
fraudulent, 7
funding (see research funding)
incentives to improve, 224–235
incentives to improve, and badges, 232
meta-research and, 216, 217–218
methodology sharing, 150
needed improvement in, 223–224
non-attachment and, 32
pharmaceutical companies, and incentives to improve, 227–228
problems and solutions, 192–196, 216, 217–236
publishing guidelines and checklists, 233
quality over quantity, 235, 236
raising awareness and, 233
raising standards and, 233–234
reasons for slowness of, 1
research reproducibility (see reproducibility)
self-correction, 143
to speed up and to slow down, 235
training for career in, 28
Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines, 233
unforced and unnecessary errors in, 3
as weak and errant, 7
See also breast cancer research; cancer research; fertility research; genetic research; genomics research; glioblastoma/brain cancer research; meta-research
biomedical scientists
competition among, 170–179, 194 (see also scientific misconduct)
fooling oneself and, 29–30, 31
promotions and tenure and, 12, 174, 224–226, 233
resistance to disruptive ideas by, 78
rewards and penalties and, 12
set up for failure, 12
solutions to structural and funding problems and, 192–196
sources of bias and error among, 15
bioRxiv.org, 230
biostatisticians, 4, 126, 142–143, 185–186. See also statistical significance; statistics
Bissell, Mina, 46
blood infections, 78
Boldt, Joachim, 181
bone marrow stem cells
transdifferentiation and, 23–25
See also stem cells
brain cell research, 84
brain damage, stroke related, 74–75, 76
brain tumor/cancer research. See glioblastoma/brain cancer research
breast cancer research, 219, 222
adaptive trial design and, 214–215
breast cancer test and, 199
cell lines and, contamination and misidentification of, 99–104
genetic profiling of, 212
tissue collection and analysis and, 199–200
breast tissue/breast-reduction surgery, 45–47
Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, 62, 204–205, 207
Brown, Pat, 100
Califf, Robert, 226
Campbell, Bill, 121
cancer-causing agents, 73
metastatic, 2, 47–49, 100, 114
See also specific cancers
Cancer Genome Atlas, The (TCGA), 202
cancer research, 7–10, 21–22, 89, 195
acknowledgment of inability to reproduce and, 10
adaptive trial design, 213–215
batch effect and, 201
blood sample collection, 201
cell lines and, contamination and misidentification of, 94–96, 99–104, 106–109
chemotherapy and, 8
clinical trial failure rate, 21
G-CSF and, 8
genomics research and, 202–203
problems, 22
reproducibility in, 8–10, 156–164
standard operating procedures and, 202–203
tissue collection and, 197–203
See also breast cancer research; glioblastoma/brain cancer research; other specific cancers
Capes-Davis, Amanda, 97–99, 99, 102, 111
Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden, 177
Casadevall, Arturo, 17–18, 164, 165–167, 169–170, 182, 236
Catholic University of America, 96
cell banks, 97, 98, 103, 106, 107, 110
cell-fingerprinting technology, 98
cell lines, 130, 203, 232, 233
antibody tests and, 122
cancer, 94–96, 99–104, 106–109, 204–205, 207–209
cell lines, contamination and misidentification of, 93–122
avoidance of misidentification, 109–111
breast cancer research and, 99–104
cancer research and, 94–96, 99–104, 106–109
cell-fingerprinting technology and, 98
cell line sharing and, 110
fertility research and, 93–94, 104–106
glioblastoma/brain cancer research and, 106–107
SNP analysis and, 111
brain, 84
induced pluripotent stem (iPS), 83–84
See also stem cells
Center for Open Science, Charlottesville, VA, 146, 157, 232
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 19
Chavalarias, David, 41
chemistry, 38
chemotherapy, 8
Cheung, Vivian, 127–128, 184–186
Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC, 44, 64
chips, in place of animal studies, 85–87
cholesterol-lowering drugs, 72
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 93, 104, 105–106
clinical pathologists, 200. See also pathologists
ClinicalTrials.gov, 147
coffee, 73
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Long Island, 170
Collins, Francis, 16, 59–60, 151, 152–153
commercial motivation, 142
“Common Genetic Variants Account for Differences in Gene Expression Among Ethnic Groups” (Spielman and Cheung), 128
among biomedical scientists, 170–179, 194 (see also scientific misconduct)
high-impact journal publications and, 174–179
postdoctoral academic research and, 173–174
promotion and tenure and, 174
telomerase discovery and, 170–172
confirmatory research
vs. exploratory research, 140–141, 145, 147
A Conspiracy of Cells (Gold), 95
coronary artery disease, 132
Correlogic Systems, 125
Crick, Francis, 33
Cure Duchenne, 65
Curtin, Daniel, 20
Curtin, Kevin, 20
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, 46, 205, 207
data analysis
batch effect and, 125, 126–130
commercial motivation and, 142
disclosure and openness and, 143
exploratory vs. confirmatory research and, 140–141
p-value and, 126, 134–138, 139–141
reproducibility and, 130
statistical significance and, 133–138, 139
reproducibility and, 150
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, 84
depression, 132
dexpramipexole (“dex”), 55
diabetes, 90
diet drugs, 89
digital data
genomics research and, 203
disease advocacy organizations, 63
DNA. See under genetic research
DNA sequencing. See under genetic research
Down syndrome, 84
ALS experimental design and, 62
animal studies and, 91
biologicals and, 91
biomarker validation and, 210–213
cancer and genome data collection, 203–210
chance and, 90
halt in, due to expense, 18
off-target effects and, 91
costs and ALS experimental design, 56–57
drug trials, 19–20, 21–22, 223
vs. animal studies, 54, 55–57, 58–59, 71–72, 77
drug/pharmaceutical companies
vs. academia and retaining jobs, and reproducibility, 212
file drawer effect and, 147–148
incentives to improve biomedical research and, 227–228
reliance on biomedical research by, 8, 13
drugs/pharmaceuticals
anti-arthritis, 142
anticancer, 51–52, 89, 109, 199
approval rate of new, 18
for brain damage caused by stroke, 74–75, 76
cholesterol-lowering, 72
diet, 89
halt in development due to expense of, 18
ovarian cancer blood test, 123–125, 127
progress in mid-1990s, 18
testing failures of, 17
type 2 diabetes, 90
worsening state of development of, 18
Duchenne muscular dystrophy
TACT and, 65
Duchenne muscular dystrophy experimental design, 63–67
See also muscular dystrophy; muscular dystrophy experimental design, 63
Duke University, 116
education. See scientific education
Einstein, Albert, 192
Eisen, Michael, 230
Emory University, 104
Errington, Tim, 157, 158, 160–162
European Commission, 64
European Union, 67
experimental design, 165. See also ALS experimental design; muscular dystrophy experimental design
experimental science, 29
exploratory research
vs. confirmatory research, 140–141, 145, 147
Faculty of 1000, 230
Failure: Why Science Is So Successful (Firestein), 38–39
Fang, Ferric, 182
FDA. See Food and Drug Administration
federal registration system, 147–150
fertility research
cell lines and, contamination and misidentification of, 93–94, 104–106
fetal bovine serum, 45
Feynman, Richard, 29
FIAU. See fialuridine
Fisher, Ronald “R. A.,” 134–135
Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 16–17, 66, 87, 105, 160, 211, 226
breast cancer test and, 199
laboratory practice guidelines of, 227
ovarian cancer blood test and, 123, 125
Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act, 147
fooling oneself
reproducibility and, 29–30, 31, 34, 40–44
fraud
scientific misconduct and, 179–186
Fujii, Yoshitaka, 181
funding. See research funding
“Future of Research” meetings, 193
G-CSF, 8
Galileo, 30
GBM Agile, 214
gene-editing technology, 120–121
Genetech, 110–114, 207, 208, 210
genetic research, 127–130, 184–186
DNA, 33–34, 127–128, 152, 155–156
DNA sequencing technology, 88, 202, 203
genomics, 131
genomics research, 130–133, 151–154, 156
digital data and, 203
Georgia State University, 190
Gilead Pharmaceuticals, 143
GIP. See good institutional practice
Gleevec, 89
glioblastoma/brain cancer research
adaptive trial design and, 213–215
cell lines and, contamination and misidentification of, 106–107
clinical trial failures, 19–20, 21–22
personal story of clinical trials and, 19–20
See also cancer; cancer research
Global Biological Standards Institute, 13–14
Gold, Michael, 95
Goldacre, Ben, 148
good institutional practice (GIP), 228
Goodman, Steven, 31–32, 137, 217–219, 221, 222–224, 229–230
Gottesman, Michael, 103, 108–109
grants. See research grants
Greenland, Sander, 221
Haibe-Kains, Benjamin, 205–207
Hall, Richard, 192
HARKing (hypothesizing, post-result), 140–142, 145–150. See also hypotheses
Harvard Medical School, 204, 208, 231
Harvard University, 116, 117, 193, 198
Hawking, Stephen, 54
HealthPartners Institute, Minnesota, 186
heart attacks, 142
Henderson, Richard, 192
Herceptin, 199
Hesterlee, Sharon, 66
HHMI. See Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Hicks, David, 199
high blood pressure, 132
Hippocrates, 196
HIV/AIDS, 18
hormone replacement therapy, 219, 222
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), 24, 37, 49, 158, 183
human cells
biomedical research and, 10–11
human disease
animal model as valid surrogate for, 68–69
human drug trials, 19–20, 21–22, 223
vs. animal studies, 54, 55–57, 58–59, 71–72, 77
Human Genome Project, 153
hypotheses, 232
federal registration system and, 147–150
post-result (see HARKing)
hysterectomies, 219
Ice Bucket Challenge of 2014, 53–54
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks (Skloot), 94
immune system checkpoint inhibitors, 51–52
index array slides, 119
induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, 83–84
influenza genomes, 154
Institute for Genomic Research, The (TIGR),151–152
Institute of Medicine, 72
interferons, 51
International Cell Line Authentication Committee, 99
The Invention of Science (Wootton), 30
investors, 65
Ioannidis, John, 11, 41, 132–133, 203, 218–222, 224
irisin
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 17–18, 164
Johns Hopkins Hospital, 94
Johns Hopkins University, 72, 77, 153, 175, 182, 217, 227, 228
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 35
Journal of Cell Biology, 47–48
Journal of Proteome Research, 213
journal publications
false-positive results in, 220
guidelines, 233
high-impact, and competition, 174–179
high-impact, and scientific misconduct, 190–191, 193
incentives to improve, and badges/openness badges, 232
promotion and tenure issues and, 224–226 (see also under biomedical scientists)
research comment sites and, 230
retractions and, 229
scientific misconduct and, 179–186
self-retractions and, 229
journal publishers
efforts to improve reproducibility and, 228–233
Kennedy, Ted, 19
Kiermer, Veronique, 172, 176–177, 178–179
Knoepfler, Paul, 230
Korch, Christopher, 94, 99, 102–105
Korea, 178
Kunkel, Louis, 63
La Barbera, Andrew, 105
laboratory practice guidelines, 227
Law, Peter, 63
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 46, 192
Leek, Jeff, 128, 129, 184–186, 221
leptin, 73
leukemia, 204
life expectancy, 2
Lingner, Joachim, 171
lipidomics, 131
literature. See scientific literature
Lorsch, Jon, 165
Lou Gehrig’s disease. See ALS
Lyell, Charles, 170
Macleod, Malcolm, 3, 15, 74–76, 81–82
Maddox, John, 231
Madsen, Daniel, 48
manufacturing equipment, high-tech, 85
Martinez, Kristina, 172–175, 193
Martinson, Brian, 186–189, 233–234
mass spectrometer, 124
Massachusetts General Hospital, 204, 205, 207
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), 10, 62, 159, 181
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 188
McElreath, Richard, 188
McGill University, Montreal, 234
MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 10, 15, 123
MD Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, 99
medical progress
vs. technological progress, 88
medical research. See biomedical research
Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK, 192
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NYC, 201
Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), 216, 217–218, 229
meta-research (research on research), 216, 217–218, 229
metabolomics, 131
metastatic cancer, 2, 47–49, 100, 114
metformin, 90
METRICS. See Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford
microarray chips, 128–129, 184
microscopy, 88
MIT. See Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Moore’s law, 18
Morton, Don, 102
Murphy, Keri, 54
Murphy, Tom, 53–55, 56, 155–156
muscular dystrophy experimental design, 63–67
funding, 64
investors and, 65
standard operating procedures, 64
See also Duchenne muscular dystrophy; Duchenne muscular dystrophy experimental design
myeloma, 109
Nagaraju, Kanneboyina (“Raju”), 64–65
Nardone, Roland, 96–97, 102, 109
National Academy of Sciences, 136, 193
National Cancer Institute (NCI), 21–22, 95, 103, 193, 201
National Center for Health Statistics, 19
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 148
National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH, 165
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), 57, 58
National Institutes of Health (NIH), 16, 40, 42, 47–48, 59, 60, 61, 66, 148, 180, 191, 194–195, 227
acknowledgment of problems in medical research and, 4
ALS research funding by, 57
brain cell research and, 84
cell line contamination and misidenitification and, 96–97, 108–109
competition for postdoctoral academic research positions and, 173
federal registration system and, 147
funding of, 2
genomics research and, 154
hepatitis B drugs and, 71
ovarian cancer blood test and, 123
personalized medicine and precision medicine and, 196
publication guidelines and, 233
research comment sites, 230
scientific education and, 165
Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, 43–44
natural philosophers, 30
natural selection of bad science, 188
Nature, 10, 16, 27, 60, 87, 97, 151, 152, 153, 175, 176–179, 205, 231, 233
Nature Reviews Genetics, 129
NCI. See National Cancer Institute
Nelson-Rees, Walter, 95, 96, 98, 99
neurological diseases, 2–3, 57–58, 82–83. See also specific neurological diseases
NIH. See National Institutes of Health
NINDS. See National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
NK-1 antagonists, 76
non-attachment, 32
North Carolina State University, 136
Nosek, Brian, 145–147, 149–150, 156–157, 161–163, 224–225, 232–233, 233–234
NXY-059, 75
Obama, Barack, 196
Office of Research Integrity, 179–180
Ohio State University, 93
Open Science Framework, 146, 147, 149, 150
organ transplants, 18
organization, 146
organoids, 84
osteoporosis, 132
ovarian cancer blood test, 123–125, 127
ovarian cell lines, 209
p-value, 126, 134–138, 139–141
Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, 66
clinical and anatomic, 200–201
standard operating procedures and, 202–203
personalized medicine, 196
Petsko, Gregory, 42, 82–84, 176, 192–193
pharmaceutical companies. See drug/pharmaceutical companies
pharmaceuticals. See drugs/pharmaceuticals
precision medicine
correlation of snippets of DNA, proteins, and other molecules with disease diagnosis or prognosis and, 198
creating new incentives and, 215–216
paradox of, 215
reengineering the culture and, 215–216
tissue collection and, 197–203
understanding perverse incentives and, 215
Preclinical Reproducibility and Robustness website channel, 230
preclinical research, 11
untrustworthiness of, 14
Price, Derek de Solla, 235
Princeton University, 193
proteomics, 131
Psychological Science, 232
psychologists, 146
psychology, 223
“Psychology’s Fears Confirmed: Rechecked Studies Don’t Hold Up,” 146
Public Library of Science (PLOS) journals, 172
publishing guidelines and checklists, 233
Pubmed Commons, 230
PubMed database, 184
PubPeer, 230
reagents, sharing of, 150
Reports of the Society for Experiments, 30
reproducibility, 8–18, 25–28, 29–33, 92, 177–178, 179, 217, 218, 221, 222, 228–236
academia vs. pharmaceutical companies and retaining jobs and, 212
ALS experimental design and, 59–60, 62
antibody testing and, 122
biomarker validation and, 211
blinding in, 42
criticism and funding of, 37
data analysis and, 130
data sharing and, 150
drug companies’ reliance on, 8, 13
flawed preclinical research and, 11
flimsy study design and analysis and, 11
fooling oneself and, 29–30, 31, 34, 40–44
illustration of thought experiment and, 31
vs. interpretation and understanding of the mechanism, 36
journal publishers’ efforts to improve, 228–233
learning from failures in, 38–40
measurement of rigor in, 25
misleading results in laboratory research and, 11
nutrients as variable biological material and, 45
organization and, 146
poorly spent funds and, 40
preventable errors in, 40
problems and solutions, 133, 232–233
questions for researchers, 27–28
scientific disagreements in, 49–52
scientific education and, 164–167
scientific error in, 15
scientific method and, 25, 30–31
scientists’ slowness to recognize problems of, 38–40
self-correcting mechanisms and, 37, 39, 40
slowdown in progress and, 11, 17–18
statistical significance and, 146–147
status and perceived expertise and, 50
technical steps to improve, 232–233
transparency and, 143, 145–147, 149
vested interests in, 50
Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, 156–163
Rescuing Biomedical Research, 194
“Rescuing US Biomedical Research from Its Systemic Flaws” (Alberts, Kirschner, Tilghman, and Varmus), 193
ALS experimental design, 53–54, 57, 61–62
muscular dystrophy experimental design, 64
problems and solutions, 192–196
scientific misconduct and, 188–190
state, for universities, 189–190
research grants
application guidelines, 60–61, 61–62
research on research. See meta-research
research reproducibility. See reproducibility
retractions, 229
rheumatology, 211
“rigor mortis,” 3
RIKEN, 179
Rimm, David, 114–116, 118–119, 121
Rosenblatt, Michael, 228
Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, 180
Salzberg, Steven, 151–152, 153–155, 163
Schekman, Randy, 158, 161, 177–178
Schwartz, Martin, 32
science
judgments and truth regarding, 4–5
Science, 152, 175, 176–179, 229–230, 231
Science Exchange, 156, 157, 158
scientific discovery
power of suggestion and, 24–25
experimental design and, 165
research methodology and, 165
switching fields and, 166
scientific literature
See also journal publications
reproducibility and, 25, 30–31
scientific misconduct
admission of mistakes and, 183
high-impact journal publications and, 190–191, 193
misleading images and, 191–192
natural selection of bad science and, 188
punishment for, 180
questionable practices vs. serious misconduct and, 186–193
retractions in scientific literature and, 180–186
unfair treatment leading to, 187–188
self-correction, 143
self-retractions, 229
Settleman, Jeffrey, 204
Shatsky, Maxim, 192
single-particle electron microscopy, 191–192
“Six Red Flags for Suspect Work” (Begley), 27
Skloot, Rebecca, 94
Smaldino, Paul, 188
SNP analysis, 111
social media, 230
SOD-1, 68
Solache, Alejandra, 121
Spiegelman, Bruce, 116, 117–118
Spielman, Richard, 127–128, 184–186
St. Johns Laboratory, London, 119
standard operating procedures, 64
Stanford University, 23, 31–32, 35, 36, 49, 77, 79, 100, 101, 132, 137, 186, 217, 224, 225, 231, 232, 234
states, financial support for universities from, 189–190
statins, 72
statistical significance, 146–147
data analysis and, 133–138, 139
See also biostatisticians; statistics
statistics, 13, 126, 134, 138, 141. See also biostatisticians; statistical significance
stem cells, 23–25, 86, 109, 179. See also cells; cell lines
Stephan, Paula, 190
stroke, 1
brain damage caused by, 74–75, 76
tPA and, 15
supplements, 73
switching fields, 166
TACT. See TREAT-NMD Advisory Committee for Therapeutics
technological progress
vs. medical progress, 88
technology
animal studies and, 83–87, 87–88
telomerase, 33–37, 49, 170–172
Tempst, Paul, 201
TERT (component of telomerase enzyme), 35–37, 171
Texas A&M University, 137
Texas sharpshooter fallacy, 140
Thomson Reuters, 178
tissue collection
collecting starting materials correctly and, 201–202
TODAY show, 123
TOP guidelines. See Transparency and Openness Promotion guidelines
Torsvik, Anja, 107
transcriptomics, 131
transparency, 143, 145–147, 149, 156–157, 163, 164
Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines, 233
TREAT-NMD Advisory Committee for Therapeutics (TACT), 67
type 2 diabetes, 90
universities, state financial support for, 189–190
University Medical Center, Utrecht, Holland, 190, 225
University of Alabama, Birmingham, 182
University of Bergen, Norway, 107
University of California, Berkeley, 158, 177, 230
University of California, Davis, 230
University of California, Merced, 188
University of California, San Francisco, 130, 189–190, 195
University of Chicago, 174
University of Colorado, 170
University of Colorado, Boulder, 36, 150
University of Colorado School of Medicine, 94
University of Edinburgh, 3, 74, 88
University of Minnesota, 78
University of North Carolina, Greensboro, 173
University of Pennsylvania, 127, 128, 139
University of Rochester, 199
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 24, 183
University of Virginia, 145, 225
University of Washington, 128–129, 182
biomedical research funding and, 123, 195
funding of NIH, 189
US Department of Defense, 64, 226
Velcade, 109
Venter, J. Craig, 152
Vioxx, 142
Wall Street Journal, 59
Wallace, Alfred Russel, 170
weight loss, 89
Weill Cornell Medical College, 42, 45, 82, 176, 178
Weinberg, Robert, 10, 159–160, 161, 181–182
Weissman, Irving, 23
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, England, 204
Whitehead Institute, MIT, 62
“Why Most Published Research Findings Are False” (Ioannidis), 11, 220
Winey, Mark, 150
Woodcock, Janet, 16–17, 211–212
Wootton, David, 30
Wyss Institute, Harvard, 84
Yamada, Ken, 42, 44–45, 191–192
Yamamoto, Keith, 130