About forty-five miles west of Warsaw flows a small and picturesque river, the Płonka; it also runs through the town of Płońsk. On one of the last days of summer in 1903, three friends went to swim there. The oldest of them, Shmuel Fuchs, was almost nineteen years old. Shlomo Zemach had just celebrated his seventeenth birthday; he was a few months older than David Yosef Gruen, who would later take the name Ben-Gurion. The three of them spent a lot of time together, bound in an intimate friendship that began in their early adolescence. “We’d swim and speak Hebrew,” Ben-Gurion related many years later.1 Sometimes they were accompanied by another young man, older than they were, Shlomo Levkowitz.
Like many members of their generation, Jews and non-Jews, they were given to gloom and overcome with existential doubts, and they were all in love. Shlomo Levkowitz and Ben-Gurion were in love with the same girl; Shmuel Fuchs was in love with Shlomo Zemach’s sister, and Zemach was in love with Fuchs’s sister. Zemach and Ben-Gurion were also in love with Shmuel Fuchs. It was a tormented camaraderie, but it endured throughout their lives; Fuchs and Levkowitz, who in the meantime changed his name to Lavi, died before Ben-Gurion; Zemach died a year after him. For seventy years, Ben-Gurion and Zemach remained joined by bonds of love and envy, just as they were on that late summer day in 1903, on the banks of the Płonka.
They had taken along the latest issue of Hatzefirah, a Hebrew-language newspaper published in Warsaw. Reading it on the riverbank, they learned that the Zionist movement was seriously considering the establishment of a Jewish state in East Africa, instead of in Palestine. The idea of establishing at least a temporary shelter there for European Jewry was known as the Uganda plan. Theodor Herzl, the venerated founder of the world Zionist movement and its first leader, refused to reject the idea out of hand; after a bitter debate, the Zionist Congress, the movement’s supreme body, decided by majority vote to send an exploratory delegation to the area. Dozens of Jews had been slaughtered a few months earlier in the city of Kishinev, then part of the Russian Empire. The willingness of many Zionists to consider the Uganda proposal grew out of their sense that the Jews of Russia urgently needed a refuge, even if it meant one in Africa. The three boys from Płońsk had closely followed the news from Kishinev. They felt humiliated and helpless, Lavi later wrote, “disheartened in both body and spirit.”2 But the three of them were shocked by the Uganda plan. Zionism, they felt, was betraying itself; they broke into tears. On the spot, their emotions rising and their bodies wet with river water, they took an oath to leave Poland and settle in Palestine. It was a seminal moment in their lives.
*
It is almost certain that most of the people that Ben-Gurion and his youthful friends knew at that time identified themselves first as Jews rather than Poles. In the eight hundred years since Jews had settled in Poland, they had suffered from discrimination and persecution, but their numbers rose into the millions and they became one of the world’s most important Jewish communities. They had solid economic and cultural foundations there, self-governing bodies, and a lively political discourse.3 Jews first settled in Płońsk about four centuries before Ben-Gurion and his friends were born. In 1815 the town came under Russian imperial rule. All government officials, including policemen and judges, served the czar; some of these were Russians themselves. Children were required to learn Russian, and young men were drafted into the Imperial Army. But just as the town’s Jews did not see themselves as Poles, neither did they see themselves as Russians.
When Ben-Gurion was ten years old, Płońsk had eight thousand inhabitants, more than half of them Jews. According to Ben-Gurion, he never encountered outright anti-Semitism there, and he saw no reason to fear a pogrom.4 Years later, long after leaving, some of its former Jewish inhabitants remained proud of being Płońskers, but they were first and foremost Jews; they felt no need to define their Jewishness beyond that. It was a small and fairly insular community. Everyone knew everyone else, and about everyone else. Most of them engaged in trades and crafts; a few were wealthy.
Zemach was the son of a businessman; his family had numbered among the community’s aristocracy for several generations. Fuchs’s family was also well-off. But many of Płońsk’s Jews lived in poverty and hardship. Levkowitz grew up in a dark alley where sewage flowed, among stinking muddy pits. When he was twelve, a cholera epidemic raged through the town. His father worked for the Zemach family, and he himself was an apprentice in a bakery. He had little schooling and Ben-Gurion described him as a “savage.”5 Levkowitz’s low station seems not to have bothered Shlomo Zemach’s father; he did not try to interfere with the friendship between the two. He did, however, forbid his son to visit David Gruen’s home, and when the boy disobeyed, his father slapped him. “The Gruen family did not have a good name in Płońsk,” Zemach wrote, and another Płońsker said that “their name was not spoken in the city, neither for good nor for ill. As if they had been condemned to oblivion.”6
Ben-Gurion’s father, Victor (Avigdor) Gruen, made a living providing a range of paralegal services. Most of his clients were Poles, many of them illiterate. He filled out forms, wrote requests, and arranged affairs with the authorities. He sometimes engaged in brokerage, arbitration, and conflict resolution. Zemach wrote that the Gruen family’s income was low and unstable. Not well-off, neither were they poor. They had a two-story wood-frame home in Goat Alley, which later became Wspolna Street; it led to the market square. Ben-Gurion’s eldest brother and his family lived in an adjacent house; the two homes were separated by a small, fenced-in garden containing apple, pear, plum, and cherry trees. The complex had been the dowry of Ben-Gurion’s mother, Sheindel; it lay just next to the Catholic church and the priest’s garden.
Coming and going among inspectors and policemen, bureaucrats and judges, Gruen befriended them, sent them felicitations on their holidays, and consoled them when they mourned. He presumably also bribed them. Quite naturally, his own community looked askance. Gruen was not the only Jew in Płońsk who worked and traded with Christians, but unlike the others he did not “dress Jewish.” Flaunting convention, he wore a short jacket, as opposed to the traditional long coat; he sometimes sported a top hat, which the Jews of Płońsk simply did not do. In the eyes of his neighbors, he was frivolous and clownish, and the gossip was that cards were played in the house. He had a hand in local politics, and sometimes got into fights.7
*
Dubche, or Dovidel, as the boy was called at home, was born on October 16, 1886, the third of three sons; he had an older and a younger sister. The family’s language was Yiddish, but they also heard a lot of Polish and Russian. A government school for Jews was established in the town a few years before Ben-Gurion’s birth, but most of the town’s Jews preferred to give their children a Jewish education. They thus sent their sons to a heder, a one-room school in the home of an instructor who kept the boys under his charge in his house throughout most of the day, teaching them to read and write in Hebrew and Yiddish, and, even more important, to study Torah and Talmud. Some children in Płońsk began school at the age of three; Ben-Gurion began when he was five. He attended several such schools, one of them a modern version where Hebrew was taught by a new immersion technique, “Hebrew in Hebrew.” He also spent a few hours each day in the government school, as the law required.8
Shlomo Zemach had other teachers, with better pedigrees and higher tuition fees. He also studied history, geography, and Greek mythology. He remembered Ben-Gurion as a skinny kid, short and a bit sickly looking. Ben-Gurion himself recalled that he suffered frequent fainting spells. The doctor recommended spending the summer with his mother’s family in one of the nearby villages, and it was there, he related, that he first came into contact with agriculture. Zemach and Levkowitz also spent time in these villages.9
A few months after Ben-Gurion turned eleven, his mother again went into labor. The child was stillborn, and a few days later she died of blood poisoning. It was a terrible blow. “For many, many nights I saw my mother in my dreams and I asked her, Mother, why don’t we see you? And she did not answer,” he wrote when he was more than eighty. “There is no barrier at all between a child and his mother …,” he continued. “A son is always his mother’s son, and when his mother dies, there is no replacement. It is not closeness, and more than love. It is identification. And something more than that. Because there is nothing like a mother’s love. There can be only one mother, and she is everything. Moreover, if she dies, no person, no friend, no acquaintance, no lover can take her place. A void remains, an empty void, full of sorrow, longing, unending sorrow and longing. Who can take her place? Orphanhood, orphanhood …” Ben-Gurion frequently spoke and wrote of his mother in later years; on more than one occasion he remarked that her death had never ceased to anguish him, in his dreams as well, even though he had no memory of her face and no photograph of her remained. “The loss has not left my heart,” he wrote many years after her death. Even though she gave birth eleven times, she cared for him as if he were her only child, he wrote. She was “a wellspring of love difficult for me to describe.” He identified her with his Zionist faith: “The nation’s foundation is the mother,” he declared at a Cabinet meeting.10 He may also have seen her image in the Land of Israel itself: “I suckled the dream of the Land of Israel along with my mother’s milk,” he wrote. When he demanded that Palestine be handed over to the Jews, he said: “The care of a child cannot be given to any woman, even an upright and fitting one. But every child can be placed in the hands of his mother.”11 Apparently he saw her before him once or twice while making decisions about the status of women in Israel. When he sought to appoint Golda Meir to his first government, he said: “Each of us owes a bit of thanks to his mother.”12 He said that his father had been both father and mother to him. “It is hard for me to forget being an orphan as a child,” he wrote, “although I was blessed with a beloved father to whom I owe much for my education and learning, and he lived to the age of eighty-six, but there is nothing like a mother.”
About two years after being widowed, Avigdor Gruen remarried. Ben-Gurion called his stepmother “aunt,” momeh in Yiddish, just as other orphans did. When he mentioned her in his letters to his father, he took care to do so with all due respect. But when he opposed handing over children who had survived the Holocaust to adoption in Israel, he wrote: “Only exceptional people are capable of adoption; we all know what a stepmother is.” As his biographer, Shabtai Teveth, wrote, he seems here to have been thinking back on his own life.13 In any case, his mother’s death shattered his childhood. Sometimes he seemingly sought to heighten the devastation of losing his mother by saying that she died when he was only ten.14 He usually recalled a brief childhood and early maturation, without joy and without games, “except chess.”
Some boys who did not have to work or learn a trade would spend their post–bar mitzvah days in a beit midrash, a religious seminary, where they studied with the help of teachers and on their own for several years until they married and had families, or even beyond that. Others were sent out of town to a gymnasium, as academic high schools were called in Central and Eastern Europe, and then on to higher studies. Ben-Gurion studied for a time at a beit midrash with Shlomo Zemach, where, Zemach claimed, he did not excel. “His brain did not grasp the abstract logical paths in those studies,” Zemach wrote, adding that he himself had excelled at Talmud.15 So Ben-Gurion was a boy orphaned of his mother, a stepson, shorter than his fellows, less gifted at his studies, who heard everywhere that his father was a dubious character. He coped with his childhood trauma as many do—he tweaked it. He often referred to his father as an “attorney,” and termed him a “recognized leader of the town’s Jews.” He claimed never to have felt any inadequacy because of his short stature—his mother had been short as well, he noted. Ben-Gurion also liked to say that a doctor who examined him when he was five years old noted that his head was relatively large and that there was a bump on the back. The doctor deduced from this that the boy had been endowed with tremendous abilities and had a great future before him. That was another reason to leave his melancholy childhood behind him, as soon as he possibly could. “At the age of fourteen I felt myself in every sense an adult,” he later said.16
As a matter of fact, by that time he was idle. He did not attend school and was not working. A biographer suggested that Ben-Gurion helped his father out, learning how to write requests, milling with the crowds along with him on the steps of courthouses, trying to rope in new clients. He read books and began keeping a diary. On Hanukah in 1900, he, Zemach, and Fuchs founded an organization they called Ezra, after the biblical scribe. Their goal was to promote the use of Hebrew in everyday life. At its height, Ezra numbered several dozen members; it lasted for about six years. It was Ben-Gurion’s first public initiative.17
Ben-Gurion later recounted that his Zionist views took form when he was a toddler of three or five; once he claimed, “I was born a Zionist.” He presumably was more accurate when he wrote that “when I still could not understand the substance of discussions and debates, I absorbed the hope of Zion that filled our house.”18 His father was one of the first Zionist activists in Płońsk, one of those who identified with a cluster of initiatives referred to collectively as Hovevei Zion. The movement’s older followers had lived through the Spring of Nations, the national and political revolutions that swept through Europe in 1848. Hovevei Zion was the Jewish answer to the upsurge in national identity and hopes for national independence that swirled around the Jews of Europe. Its adherents identified themselves not just as believers in the Jewish religion, but as members of a Jewish nation. The members of these different societies tried to form an international organization, but Hovevei Zion was fundamentally a romantic and even religious, rather than a political, movement. Many promoted it as a response to the discrimination and persecution of Jews. Socialism was also making its way into the Jewish communities of the Russian Empire at this time. Some of the socialist groups promoted agricultural settlement in Palestine, organizing settlers to found farming communities there, and supporting them thereafter. It was the beginning of what would later be called “practical Zionism.”19
Zionism was a movement founded in Europe, inspired by its culture, and embedded in its history. Zionism’s nationalism, romanticism, liberalism, and socialism all came from that continent. In this sense, the history of the Zionist presence in Palestine belongs to European history.
Avigdor Gruen had not yet thought of settling in Zion. In fact, once he became active in Hovevei Zion, he had much less incentive to leave Poland. His social isolation, which might have driven him to emigrate, largely ended thanks to his Zionist activity, which brought him into contact with people who had previously done their best not to be seen in his company. He hosted them in his home once a week for a meeting where, among other things, they together read the Hebrew newspapers Hatzefirah and Hamelitz. Ben-Gurion could not remember whether his grandfather had also been a member of the group, but recalled sitting on his grandfather’s lap and being taught Hebrew—first syllables, then words, and finally complete sentences.20
About four months before Ben-Gurion’s tenth birthday, Hamelitz made its first mention of a man named Theodor Herzl, the author of a new book just published in Vienna, The Jewish State. The item was very positive.21 Word of Herzl quickly spread. Rumors ran through Płońsk that the Messiah had arrived. Ben-Gurion recalled that they spoke of “a tall, handsome man” with a black beard.22 Herzl was not, in fact, tall, nor did he promise divine redemption. Furthermore, as opposed to Hovevei Zion, he did not believe in the efficacy of the settlement of individual Jews in Palestine. His aim was a full-fledged nation-state; to that end he founded a global organization that would seek Jewish independence by negotiating an agreement with the Ottoman Empire and the European powers. In other words, his was political, rather than practical, Zionism. Avigdor Gruen immediately became an enthusiastic supporter of Herzl’s. So did a local shopkeeper named Simcha Isaac. The two of them founded a society they named Bnei Zion—Children of Zion. They began to collect “shekels,” as membership dues in the Zionist movement were called, and to send donations to Palestine. In September 1900, the organization reported having two hundred members.*
*
The Zionist activity in Płońsk attracted outside attention. Hamelitz covered a meeting held in Gruen’s home. A pamphlet in Yiddish, written by the famous author Shalom Aleichem, was read out loud. Its title was “Why Do the Jews Need Their Own Country?” After the reading, the assembled sang Zionist songs.23 Ben-Gurion could certainly have imbibed Zionism in his childhood. Unlike several of his friends, his road to Zionism did not require him to rebel against his father. In that sense it was easier for him.
The newspaper report also indicates that a Zionist gathering in Płońsk was an exceptional event. In fact, most of Poland’s Jews, including those of Ben-Gurion’s age cohort, were not Zionists. Ben-Gurion and his friends were thus exceptional, on the verge of eccentric. He stood out among them because he could speak a bit of Hebrew; his friends had trouble keeping up with him on this score. Zemach related that his own Hebrew sounded ludicrous at first. Levkowitz found it even harder—at that time, he was barely able to read and almost never wrote, in any language. Rather than speak Hebrew, he would communicate with his friends by means of gestures and facial expressions.24 Fuchs’s Hebrew was that of his sacred studies and the synagogue liturgy; everyday Hebrew was a foreign language for him. For the first time in his life, Ben-Gurion had an advantage over his friends.
One seminary allowed them to organize an evening class that included Hebrew lessons and lectures on Zionist subjects; the teenage Ben-Gurion gave talks on Zionism and culture. Once or twice they circulated a mimeographed pamphlet. Ben-Gurion published poems there. One day he traveled to Warsaw to ask for the support of Hatzefirah’s editor, Nahum Sokolow. It was Ben-Gurion’s first public initiative outside his hometown. Hatzefirah did not write anything about Ezra. Sokolow might well not have seen anything new about it.25
It was certainly not Ben-Gurion and his friends who woke Hebrew from its long sleep. A hundred years before, Poland was already one of the centers of a new European Hebrew-language literary culture. Organizations to promote the Hebrew language were already in existence in any number of places; in Płońsk, Ezra was preceded by thirty years by another such group.26
Yiddish continued to be the principal language of the town’s Jews, but the boys of Ezra became adept at Hebrew and used it as a kind of secret argot for themselves. They wrote their letters in modern Hebrew, generally correct, sometimes even rich; their penmanship is adept.
The letters that the four friends wrote to each other after they parted, and the memoirs they later published, exude tormented adolescent angst; they felt trapped between the outgoing century and the new one. “My soul is not at peace,” Ben-Gurion wrote. “I do not know why I am sometimes so sad, so dejected, and I feel a deep emptiness, great and looming in my heart … I have intense longing for something, I know not what.”27 Levkowitz also recalled “youthful yearning for an unclear unknown” and for “all that is distant.” He felt a “towering thirst” to do a “great deed,” and suffered from intense depression and anxiety. He was sick of life. Zemach was tormented with similar thoughts. “We wondered about life as death and death as life, not understanding much of these, but nevertheless absorbing something into us,” he wrote in his memoirs. He wrote to Fuchs: “It is impossible to die and I am unable to live.”28
Zemach was tall and handsome, with curly hair and a black mustache; he was a proud, conceited gossip. Along with other boys, he made fun of Levkowitz for his ignorance and even publicly humiliated his father in synagogue. He mocked “Mr. Avigdor,” as he called Ben-Gurion’s father, for making spelling mistakes in Russian.29 According to Zemach, Fuchs was an “emotional,” “delicate,” and somewhat “passive” boy. “His character was overdelicate and there was something feminine in every mood of his, but this tenderness was pleasant and very attractive,” he wrote.30
Fuchs did not make himself out to be as depressed as his friends, but he seems to have shared Levkowitz’s longing for “all that is distant.” In 1904 he went to London, leaving behind in Płońsk Zemach’s sister, whom he loved. Zemach wrote to tell him that she sometimes asked about him. But mostly he wrote about his own love for Fuchs’s sister, and his feelings for Fuchs himself. “I so miss you, so very much desire and crave to see you, my beloved friend. O, if I only had shaken your hand before you left, if I could only embrace you and bestow kisses on you.” He once signed a letter with the parting phrase “Your brother embraces you with fierce love and kisses you.”31 Sometimes he patronized him. In London, Fuchs intended to study at a rabbinical college, but had trouble supporting himself. Zemach admonished him: “You have just crossed the threshold and now I’m already hearing dissatisfaction, resentment, and grievances … What did you think, that they would roll out a band to welcome you upon your arrival in London?” Zemach described his relations with Ben-Gurion at that time as close friendship. The two met daily, and according to Zemach, there were no secrets between them save one—he did not speak of his love for Fuchs’s sister. He may well not have spoken of his love for Fuchs, either.
Ben-Gurion told Fuchs that he first fell in love at the age of twelve. “My love then was as soft as the buds of spring,” he recounted poetically when he was eighteen, “and it grew in time and ignited like a flame—and last summer I learned that she loves me … I thought I had ascended to heaven.”32 When he first saw her, she was about ten years old, a student at the government school that he attended. Her name was Rachel Nelkin and she had black braids. This may well be the same girl who “very much captured” Levkowitz’s heart as well.
Levkowitz was a tall, slender youth with a long nose and small eyes. “He’s not handsome,” Zemach wrote.33 He was also very shy. He first caught sight of Rachel at the home of her stepfather, Simcha Isaac, who regularly convened Zionist meetings for young people in the back room of his store. “Sometimes I thought that those boys were not enthralled so much by Simcha Isaac as by his beautiful daughter,” Levkowitz wrote.34 For a long time, he lacked the courage to speak to her. He only spoke with her father, with great gravity. He secretly envied his friends, who were more successful than he, but he put on a pretense of insouciance. Yet he thought of her incessantly, day and night. In the end, he fashioned a scheme to encounter Rachel alone, but after lying in wait, when he found himself face-to-face with her, he blushed, turned his face away, and pretended he had not even noticed her presence. Afterward, he cursed himself and his idiocy. Levkowitz seems to have found life a heavier burden than his friends did. His bashfulness might have killed him had Zionism not taken his mind off his plight, he later wrote.35
He sometimes went to the Gruens’ house, which he also described as “a center of Zionism.” Coming from a poor neighborhood, he saw the Gruens as wealthy. He was drawn there by “a magic that he did not understand,” but something also repelled him—specifically, Ben-Gurion’s two sisters. Paralyzed in their presence, there too he put on a show of having come to talk about the Zionist future.36 It was a particularly tough time to be a teenager. In Płońsk, social interactions between the sexes were still subject to very strict rules. When a boy and a girl were in love, Ben-Gurion related, a matchmaker could generally be called in to arrange things. As Levkowitz put it, “We boys sat over our pages of Talmud, studied, fantasized, and waited for a good match.”37 When it seemed to him that Ben-Gurion was winning Nelkin’s love, Levkowitz was crushed.38
Zemach did not have that problem. One night, when he was eighteen, he had trouble falling asleep. He turned from side to side, then got dressed and opened his bedroom window. Looking into the window of the house across the street, he saw his neighbors’ daughter, Shoshana, Shmuel Fuchs’s sister. For the next hour the two sat at their windows and gazed at each other, as dawn broke. Zemach felt “huge excitement,” as he wrote afterward to Fuchs. “If I didn’t go insane back then [it must be because] I am solid iron … David Gruen told me that I had the look of a lunatic.”
In the months that followed, he continued to share his infatuation with Fuchs. “I am so much in love that I am sometimes ashamed of myself,” he wrote. He promised that he had never even considered touching her, and again quoted their mutual friend: “D. Gruen tells me that I am overly idealistic and that he cannot understand how I can be that way.”39
Zemach’s Zionism was more than a national-ideological aspiration—it was also a fledgling’s longing to flee the nest, to spread his wings, and to go where he wished. Life in Płońsk seemed “banal” to him; he wanted to go to Odessa, to study science and foreign languages, including Arabic and Turkish, the languages spoken in Palestine. Then he would return to Płońsk, not in order “to sink again into the bog” but to take Shoshana and to settle in the Land of Israel. He dreamed of being a Hebrew writer.40 In the meanwhile, youth afflicted him. “I am not happy, my fate is evil and bitter,” he lamented. “When will I finally stop being subject to my parents and become my own man?”41
Other adolescents felt the same way, deeply troubling their parents. They felt that they were losing their children. When the girls took their daily walk through town, Zemach and his companions did their best to impress them. They’d loiter on the sidewalk on the other side of the street and speak Hebrew to each other, as loudly as they could. Zemach smoked. In photographs from this period the boys are bareheaded, eschewing the traditional cap, and are in the company of girls.42 Ben-Gurion swaggered, so as to impress the beautiful Rachel Nelkin. Once he went out for a walk with the daughter of family friends from Warsaw. “It was not long before the entire town was at our heels,” he related.43 Parents had a hard time accepting such scandalous behavior, and many of them attributed it to Zionism.
In its first article on The Jewish State, Hamelitz declared that Herzl “will not find a path into the hearts of the God-fearing,” with just a few exceptions.44 Longing for the Land of Israel had always been a part of the Jewish religion. It fostered a dream of a return to the Holy Land, of aliyah, literally “ascent,” as the book of Genesis puts it in its account of Abraham’s wanderings. Yet the Zionists angered the vast majority of Orthodox leaders, in particular the ultra-Orthodox ones who termed themselves Haredim.† Avraham Gruen, Ben-Gurion’s eldest brother, wrote of a “huge civil war,” including persecution and boycotts, that also “made it difficult to earn a living.” Some rabbis forbade their followers to marry into Zionist families.
Zionism required its supporters to reconsider their Jewish identities and to position themselves between the values of Jewish tradition and a new Jewish nationalism. It was a revolutionary challenge. At the founding assembly of Ezra, the organization that Ben-Gurion and his friends founded, blows were traded with Haredim who tried to disrupt the event. “The opponents of Zionism viewed us as Satan himself,” Zemach wrote.45 But the Zionist movement did not keep religious Jews out. Most Jews, including most maskilim (modernizing, “enlightened” Jews) and Zionists, continued to define their Jewish identities in religious terms.
Ben-Gurion described his father as being of “free opinions.” Indeed, Gruen complained that religious education in Płońsk had created a “generation of ignoramuses.”46 He sent his son to a modernized heder, where secular subjects were also taught. But he remained on close terms with his religion. Most likely he was not sorry when his Dubche suddenly, at the age of seven, began strictly observing the commandments. Nor did he object, when the boy was a bit older, to his school’s stress on Talmud as the main subject of study. He was upset when, at the age of fourteen, his son stopped putting on tefillin, the phylacteries worn by Jews during the morning prayer service. Gruen himself attended services at the synagogue every morning, but appears bareheaded in photographs.47 His Orthodox rivals branded him a maskil. The conflict between Płońsk’s Haredim and early Zionists was in fact one among religious Jews who differed in the strictness of their observance and their lifestyles. To a large extent, it was a power struggle. Gruen complained that Haredi functionaries had taken over the community leadership and said that some of them had informed on him to the police, charging him with smuggling money out of the country. Ben-Gurion’s relations with his father were generally good. His friends had to deal with greater challenges.
Shlomo Levkowitz and his father went through an extended confrontation that was extremely painful to both. Zemach knew fathers who declared their sons dead and observed mourning rituals for them after the sons adopted a Zionist lifestyle. “You cannot imagine the pain,” he wrote to Fuchs.48 The Zionist faith of a number of Ben-Gurion’s friends thus required much more fortitude, and sometimes more courage, than Ben-Gurion himself had to display.
*
Zionist culture was easily accessible in Płońsk. The town had a library run by a man named Lipa Taub. He functioned as Ezra’s secretary, but the library preceded the organization.49 Apparently it was there that Ben-Gurion found the books he read, some of them in Hebrew—he later recalled being infatuated with Bialik’s poetry, and reading other poets and writers. Avraham Mapu’s Love of Zion, published in 1853 and considered the first Hebrew novel, intensified Ben-Gurion’s longing for the Land of Israel. Avraham Zinger’s translation of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, published in 1896, impelled his revulsion at slavery, subjugation, and dependence; both books made a huge impression on him. He also read in Russian, adopting vegetarianism for a while after reading Tolstoy’s Resurrection. Zemach also read a great deal, as did other young people. All of them were enthusiastic admirers of a Ukrainian-born Jew named Micha Josef Berdichevsky.
“In my youth, I recall,” Ben-Gurion later wrote, “Berdichevsky’s articles were the ones that most made an impression on the young people in my town.” Berdichevsky had a much greater impact than Asher Ginsberg, who wrote under the pseudonym Ahad Ha’am; the two writers were on opposite sides of numerous literary and political controversies. To these young people, Ahad Ha’am sounded like the voice of tradition and narrow horizons, dry and severe; it was the voice of an old man. Berdichevsky sounded young, rebellious, masculine, exciting: “We have no room to move! … Our time has come to find our way out into the open spaces,” he wrote in a public letter to Ahad Ha’am. Ben-Gurion and his companions heard in Berdichevsky’s writing a call to take their fate into their own hands and to make history.
They did not always correctly comprehend Berdichevsky’s position on Zionism, but his voice was an expression of what they felt churning inside them. Levkowitz found in his works “the mood of the thoughts rising from the heart into the brain and returning to pound on a restless heart.” Ben-Gurion found in them “a great passion for a free and natural life in the land of our fathers.”50 In Berdichevsky’s writing, the young people seem to have found a refuge from adolescent despondency and an answer to the life questions that tormented them.
*
They felt more and more constricted in Płońsk. “The Jewish town is emptying of substance,” Zemach wrote. “Life in Płońsk became tedious and I sought a new life.”51 The world outside called out not only to him and his friends but also to many others. In the fifteen years that preceded World War I, about 1.7 million Jews emigrated from Eastern Europe, mostly for the United States, Britain, and Argentina. It was not a new phenomenon, but it was surging and becoming a huge wave. A third of the region’s Jews left during this period.52 The emigrants sent letters home, and sometimes returned for visits. They told exciting and fantastic stories about their new lives in other lands, where the twentieth century was in full swing. It was an American dream, as Herzl wrote: “America must conquer Europe, in the same way as large landed possessions absorb small ones.”53
From its inception, the Zionist movement had marketed itself as an agent of progress and had promised to bring modern technology to Palestine, including “roads and railroads, electric lines, the telephone, and water pipes.”54 Ben-Gurion and his friends could thus see Zionism as the doorway into the wonderful world that began to appear before their eyes at the beginning of the new century. In the spring of 1904, Gruen permitted his son to move to Warsaw. There Ben-Gurion could, for the first time, turn on an electric light, attend a moving picture show, and see an automobile for the first time in his life. There were telephones as well. “Technical science had given wings to the rhythm of life,” Stefan Zweig wrote.55 Coming of age alone in the big city could be exciting, but it could also be pretty depressing.
* Shlomo Zemach alleged that Gruen “was in no hurry” to deposit the dues he collected in the organization’s coffers. He would use the money for his household expenses and had trouble paying it back when asked. As a result, the organization decided to stop collecting shekels. Ben-Gurion later related that he had wanted to collect shekels from his classmates, but that the adults did not allow it. (Zemach 1983, p. 19; Ben-Gurion 1974b, p. 31; Hatzefirah, Sept. 14, 1900.)
† The religious argument against Zionism is based on a Talmudic passage that speaks of two prohibitions that God imposed on the Jews of the Exile: they were not to storm the wall (which was generally understood to mean taking the initiative or using force to regain the Holy Land), or to rebel against the nations. At the same time, the gentiles were enjoined not to overly oppress the Jews. Known as the “three oaths” to which God swore the Jews and the gentiles, they were traditionally understood as mandating Jewish passivity. They were to await help from heaven rather than take matters into their own hands. (Salmon 1990, p. 51; Bacon 2001, 2, p. 453ff.; Zemach 1963a, p. 42ff.)