Chapter 3

The Reading Test: Basic Approach

Half of your Evidence-Based Reading and Writing score comes from the Reading Test, a 65-minute test that requires you to answer 52 questions spread out over five passages. The questions will ask you to do everything from determining the meaning of words in context to deciding an author’s purpose for a detail to finding the main idea of a whole passage to pinpointing information on a graph. Each passage ranges from 500 to 750 words and has 10 or 11 questions. Time will be tight on this test. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce you to a basic approach that will streamline how you take the test and allow you to focus on only what you need to get your points.

SAT READING: CRACKING THE PASSAGES

You read every day. From street signs to novels to the back of the cereal box, you spend a good part of your day recognizing written words. So this test should be pretty easy, right?

Unfortunately, reading on the SAT is different from reading in real life. In real life, you read passively. Your eyes go over the words, the words go into your brain, and some stick and some don’t. On the SAT, you have to read actively, which means trying to find specific information to answer specific questions. Once you’ve found the information you need, you have to understand what it’s actually saying.

Reading on the SAT is also very different from the reading you do in school. In English class, you are often asked to give your own opinion and support it with evidence from a text. You might have to explain how Scout Finch and Boo Radley in To Kill a Mockingbird are, metaphorically speaking, mockingbirds. Or you might be asked to explain who is actually responsible for the tragedies in Romeo and Juliet. On the SAT, however, there is no opinion. You don’t have the opportunity to justify why your answer is the right one. That means there is only one right answer, and your job is to find it. It’s the weirdest scavenger hunt ever.

Your Mission:

Read five passages and answer 10 or 11 questions for each passage (or set of passages). Get as many points as you can.

Okay, so how do you get those points? Let’s start with the instructions for the Reading Test.

DIRECTIONS

Each passage or pair of passages below is followed by a number of questions. After reading each passage or pair, choose the best answer to each question based on what is stated or implied in the passage or passages and in any accompanying graphics (such as a table or graph).

Great news! This is an open-book test. Notice the directions say based on what is stated or implied in the passage. This means that you are NOT being tested on whether you have read, studied, and become an expert on the Constitution, The Great Gatsby, or your biology textbook. All the test writers care about is whether or not you can read a text and understand it well enough to correctly answer some questions about it. Unlike the Math and Writing and Language Tests, there are no formulas to memorize or comma rules to learn for the Reading Test. You just need to know how to approach the passages, questions, and answer choices in a way that maximizes your accuracy and efficiency. It’s all about the text! (No thinking!)

Another awesome thing about an open-book test is that you don’t have to waste time reading every single word of the passage and trying to become an expert on whatever the topic is. You have the passage right there in front of you. So, move back and forth between the passage and the questions, focusing only on what you need to know instead of getting mired down in all the little details.

POOD and the Reading Test

You will get all five of the reading passages at the same time, so use that to your advantage. Take a quick look through the whole section and figure out the best order in which to do the passages. Depending on your target score, you may be able to skip an entire passage or two, so figure out which passages are likely to get you the most points and do those first.

Consider the following:

Don’t forget: On any questions or passages that you skip, always fill in your LOTD!

Basic Approach for the Reading Test

Follow these steps for every Reading passage. We’ll go over these in greater detail in the next few pages.

1. Read the Blurb. The short paragraph at the beginning of each passage may not contain a lot of information, but it can be helpful for identifying the type of passage, as well as the source.

2. Select and Understand a Question. For the most part, do the questions in order, saving the general questions for last and using your LOTD on any questions or passages you want to skip.

3. Read What You Need. Don’t read the whole passage! Use line references and lead words to find the reference for the question, and then carefully read a window of about 10–12 lines (usually about 5 or 6 lines above and below the line reference/lead word) to find the answer to the question.

4. Predict the Correct Answer. Your prediction should come straight from the text. Don’t analyze or paraphrase. Often, you’ll be able to find a sentence or phrase in the text that you can actually underline to predict the answer.

5. Use POE. Eliminate anything that isn’t consistent with your prediction. Don’t necessarily try to find the right answer immediately, because there is a good chance you won’t see an answer choice that you like. If you can eliminate choices that you know are wrong, though, you’ll be closer to the right answer. If you can’t eliminate three answers with your prediction, use the POE criteria (which we’ll talk about later on).

“Where the Money Is”

A reporter once asked notorious thief Willie Sutton why he robbed banks. Legend has it that his answer was, “Because that’s where the money is.” While reading comprehension is much safer and more productive than larceny, the same principle applies. Concentrate on the questions and answer choices because that’s where the points are. The passage is just a place for the test writers to stash facts and details. You’ll find them when you need to. What’s the point of memorizing all 67 pesky details about plankton if you’re asked about only 12?

Let’s see these steps in action!

What follows is a sample reading passage followed by a series of questions. Don’t start working the passage right away. In fact, you can’t, because we’ve removed the answer choices. Just turn to this page, where we will begin going through each step of the Reading Basic Approach using this sample passage and questions.

SAMPLE PASSAGE AND QUESTIONS

Here is an example of an SAT Reading passage and questions. We will use this passage to illustrate the Reading Basic Approach throughout this chapter. You don’t need to do the questions now, but you might want to paperclip this page so it’s easy to flip back to later.

Questions 11–21 are based on the following passage.

This passage is adapted from Linton Weeks’s “The Windshield-Pitting Mystery of 1954.” © 2015 by NPR History Department.

The nationwide weirdness that was the Windshield-Pitting Mystery began in the spring of 1954. Looking back at the events today may give us a window—OK, a windshield—on the makeup and the mindset of mid-20th-century America. The epidemic’s epicenter, according to HistoryLink—an online compendium of Washington state history—was the town of Bellingham, where “tiny holes, pits, and dings…seemingly appeared in the windshields of cars at an unprecedented rate” in late March. “Panicked residents,” the website reports, suspected “everything from cosmic rays to sand-flea eggs to fallout from H-bomb tests.” In Canton, Ohio, some 1,000 residents
notified police that their windshields had been “blemished in a mysterious manner,” the Daily Mail of Hagerstown, MD reported on April 17. And United Press in New York noted on April 20 that “new reports of mysterious windshield pittings came in today almost as fast as theories about what causes them.” A Canadian scientist posited that the marks were made by the skeletons of minute marine creatures that had been propelled into the air by hydrogen bomb testing in the Pacific Ocean. In Utah, someone suggested that acid from flying bugs might be the source of the windshield-denting, but a Brigham Young University biologist disproved the theory, the Provo Daily Herald reported on June 27. As summer rolled on, reports
of pitting decreased everywhere and the country moved on to building backyard fallout shelters. But the question remains: What about those pitted windshields? For guidance, we turn to Missouri State University sociologist David Rohall, who has taught courses in social movements and collective behavior for more than a decade. “Much of what happens in society is a numbers game,” Rohall says. “If you have more people, any phenomenon starts to appear more common if you focus on any one event or behavior. Even something that is very infrequent may start to appear to be a trend, he says, “when you aggregate those events. There are millions of cars in Washington state but thousands
of cases of pitting. While thousands sounds like a huge phenomenon, it represents less than 1 percent of cars. If everyone is looking for and reporting it, it would appear to be a conspiracy of some sort.” Windshield-pitting, Rohall says, “may be more like crop circles in which there is physical evidence that ‘something’ happened but no one is certain of the cause. Of course, we have since found evidence that, in some cases, people utilize special equipment to make those crop circles. The cause of the pitting is different because it would be very difficult to capture someone creating them.” “Most people in the field no longer believe in mass hysteria as a cause of large-group behavior,” Rohall says. “The idea came from Gustave Le Bon,
a French theorist trying to explain the strange behavior of large groups during the French Revolution, in which average citizens began killing large numbers of people via the guillotine. What would cause them to do such a heinous thing?” Even if the theory were true, Rohall says, “it is designed to be applied to situations of heightened emotional arousal—for example: large crowds. While the ideas about pitting may have ‘caught on’ among people in the region, I doubt it was an emotional contagion that drove them to act in a particular way.” “War of the Worlds is a wonderful example of how the media emphasizes the few ‘real cases’ of hysteria without recognizing that the vast majority of people knew that the radio program was fictional and did nothing,” Rohall adds. “Like crop
circles, we know that some of them are man-made, so might these pits. However, the media may have had people start noticing the pits that had already been there.” He likens the experience to this: “It is very common for people to believe that they have contracted an illness when they hear a doctor describe a medical problem and the symptoms associated with that problem. I suspect that most people already had these pits all along and only attributed it to the mysterious cause when they heard other people doing it. Still others may have resulted from vandalism or new cases from simple accidents—debris from the roads. Is this hysteria or simply logical thinking utilizing information from the media and their own situation—a pitted car? Some research about supposed ‘hysteria’ really shows that people are not hysterical at all.”

These are the questions for the passage. We’ve removed the answer choices because, for now, we just want you to see the different question types the SAT will ask. Don’t worry about answering these here; we’ll walk you through some of them in this chapter.

11. The central claim of the passage is that

12. The author most likely mentions the Canadian scientist (line 22) and the Utah resident (line 26) in order to

13. The author’s statement that the “country moved on to building backyard fallout shelters” (lines 31–32) implies that Americans

14. As used in line 41, “common” most nearly means

15. The passage indicates that an effect of aggregating events is

16. According to the passage, what percent of cars in Washington suffered damage?

17. Which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question?

18. The author most likely mentions War of the Worlds in line 73 in order to

19. The quotation marks around the word “hysteria” in line 94 most likely indicate

20. Based on the passage, the author most likely agrees that “pitting” is

21. Which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question?

Step 1: Read the Blurb

You should always begin by reading the blurb (the introductory material preceding the passage). The blurb gives you the title of the piece, as well as the author and the publication date. Typically, the blurb won’t have much more information than that, but it’ll be enough for you to identify whether the passage is literature, history/social studies, or science. It will also give you a sense of what the passage will be about and can help you make a POOD (Personal Order of Difficulty) decision about when to do the passage.

The Strategy

1. Read the Blurb

Read the blurb at the beginning of the passage on this page. Based on the blurb, is this a literature, history/social studies, or science passage? What will the passage be about?

Step 2: Select and Understand a Question

Select…

Notice that the steps of the Basic Approach have you jumping straight from the blurb to the questions. There is no “Read the Passage” step. You get points for answering questions, not for reading the passage, so go straight to the questions.

The Strategy

1. Read the Blurb

2. Select and Understand a Question

On a school test, you probably answer the questions in order. That seems logical and straightforward. However, doing the questions in order on a Reading passage can set you up for a serious time issue. According to the College Board, the order of the questions “is also as natural as possible, with general questions about central ideas, themes, point of view, overall text structure, and the like coming early in the sequence, followed by more localized questions about details, words in context, evidence, and the like.” So to sum it up: the general questions come first, followed by the specific questions.

That question structure works great in an English class, when you have plenty of time to read and digest the text on your own. But when you’re trying to get through five passages in just over an hour, you don’t have time for that. So, instead of starting with the general questions and then answering the specific questions, we’re going to flip that and do the specific questions first.

Look back at the questions on this page.

What does the first question ask you about?

In order to answer that question, you’d have to read what part of the passage?

What you do not want to do is read the whole passage. So skip that first question. You’ll come back to it, but not until you’ve done the specific questions. Once you go through and answer all (or most) of the specific questions, you’ll have a really good idea what the test writers think is important. You’ll also have read most of the passage, so answering the general questions will be easy.

Remember we mentioned earlier that the questions are in chronological order? Look at the line references in the specific questions. What do you notice about them?

Yup; they’re in sequential order! So work through them as they’re given, and you’ll work through the passage from beginning to end. Avoid getting stuck on questions, though. If you find yourself stumped, use your LOTD and move on to the next question. You can always come back if you have time.

Based on that logic, let’s skip the first question and move on to the second question.

…and Understand

Once you’ve selected a question, you need to make sure you understand what it’s asking. Reading questions are often not in question format. Instead, they will make statements such as, “The author’s primary reason for mentioning the gadfly is to,” and then the answer choices will follow. Make sure that you understand the question by turning it into a question—that is, back into a sentence that ends with a question mark and begins with Who/What/Why.

12. The author most likely mentions the Canadian scientist (line 22) and the Utah resident (line 26) in order to

What is this question asking?

Rephrase the Question…

…so that it asks:

Who?

What?

Why?

Notice the phrase in order to at the end of the question. That phrase lets you know the question can be rephrased as a “why” question. So for this particular question, you want to figure out “Why does the author mention the Canadian scientist and the Utah resident?”

Step 3: Read What You Need

Line Reference and Lead Words

Many questions will refer you to a specific set of lines or to a particular paragraph, so you won’t need to read the entire passage to answer those questions. Those are line references. Other questions may not give you a line reference, but may ask about specific names, quotes, or phrases that are easy to spot in the text. We’ll call those lead words. It’s important to remember that the line reference or lead word shows you where the question is answered in the passage, but you’ll have to read more than that single line in order to find the answer in the passage.

The Strategy

1. Read the Blurb

2. Select and Understand a Question

3. Read What You Need

If you read a window of about five lines above and five lines below each line reference or lead word, you should find the information you need. It’s important to note that while you do not need to read more than these 10–12 lines of text, you usually cannot get away with reading less. If you read only the lines from the line reference, you will very likely not find the information you need to answer the question. Read carefully! You should be able to put your finger on the particular phrase, sentence, or set of lines that answers your question. If you save the general questions that relate to the passage as a whole for last, then by the time you begin those questions, you’ll have a greater understanding of the passage even if you haven’t read it from beginning to end.

Read a window of about 5 lines above and 5 lines below the line reference to get the context for the question.

5 Above, 5 Below

5 is the magic number when it comes to line reference questions. Read 5 lines above the line reference and then 5 lines below it to get all of the information you need in order to answer the question correctly.

12. The author most likely mentions the Canadian scientist (line 22) and the Utah resident (line 26) in order to

What are the line references in this question?

What lines will you need to read to find the answer?

Once you underline the line references and find your window, draw a bracket around it so you can find it easily. The more you can get out of your brain and onto the page, the better off you’ll be. Because the line references are line 22 and line 26, you should read lines 17–31. In this case, that paragraph would be a good window.

Now it’s time to read. Even though you’re reading only a small chunk of the text, make sure you read it carefully.

Step 4: Predict Your Answer

The test writers do their best to distract you by creating tempting but nevertheless wrong answers. However, if you know what you’re looking for in advance, you will be less likely to fall for a trap answer. Before you even glance at the answer choices, take the time to think about what specific, stated information in your window supplies the answer to the question. Be careful not to paraphrase too far from the text or try to analyze what you’re reading. Remember, what might be a good “English class” answer may lead you in the wrong direction on the SAT! Stick with the text.

The Strategy

1. Read the Blurb

2. Select and Understand a Question

3. Read What You Need

4. Predict Your Answer

As you read the window, look for specific lines or phrases that answer the question. Often what you’re looking for will be in a sentence before or after the line reference or lead word, so it’s crucial that you read the full window.

Once you’ve found text to answer the question, underline it if you can! Otherwise, jot down a prediction for the answer, sticking as closely to the text as possible.

Let’s take a look at question 12 again, this time with the window.

12. The author most likely mentions the Canadian scientist (line 22) and the Utah resident (line 26) in order to

Here’s your window from the passage. See if you can read it and find something that answers the question. Underline your prediction if you can.

In Canton, Ohio, some 1,000 residents notified police that their windshields had been “blemished in a mysterious manner,” the Daily Mail of Hagerstown, MD reported on April 17. And United Press in New York noted on April 20 that “new reports of mysterious windshield pittings came in today almost as fast as theories about what causes them.” A Canadian scientist posited that the marks were made by the skeletons of minute marine creatures that had been propelled into the air by hydrogen bomb testing in the Pacific Ocean. In Utah, someone suggested that acid from flying bugs might be the source of the windshield-denting, but a Brigham Young University biologist disproved the theory, the Provo Daily Herald reported on June 27.

Did you underline the phrase new reports of mysterious windshield pittings came in today almost as fast as theories about what causes them? The passage provides clear evidence that the Canadian scientist and Utah resident are mentioned in order to give examples of some of the theories about the causes of pitting that were zipping in.

Step 5: Use Process of Elimination

A multiple-choice test is a cool thing because the right answer will always be on the page in front of you. All you have to do is eliminate the answer choices that are incorrect. Sometimes, especially on the Reading Test, it’s easier to find wrong answers that aren’t supported by the passage rather than trying to find the right answer that might not look the way you think it should.

Process of Elimination, or POE, involves two steps. The first step involves asking yourself the question, “What can I eliminate that doesn’t match—or is inconsistent with—my prediction?” For many of the more straightforward questions, this step will be enough to get down to the right answer.

The Strategy

1. Read the Blurb

2. Select and Understand a Question

3. Read What You Need

4. Predict Your Answer

5. Use Process of Elimination

12. The author most likely mentions the Canadian scientist (line 22) and the Utah resident (line 26) in order to

Remember, in Step 4, you used the text to predict that the Canadian scientist and Utah resident are mentioned in order to give examples of some of the theories about the causes of pitting that were zipping in. Eliminate any choice that has nothing to do with that prediction. Here are the answers provided in the test.

 

Keep?

Eliminate?

A) provide support for a previous statement.

B) dispute claims made by experts.

C) prove a theory about an occurrence.

D) show the unprecedented nature of a phenomenon.

 

 

Did you eliminate all answer choices except (A)? None of the other choices have anything to do with your prediction. Additionally, once you’re down to an answer choice that seems to support your prediction, use the text to make sure you can prove it. What’s the previous statement? Theories coming in quickly. What’s the support? Examples from Canada and Utah.

POE Criteria

On many questions you’ll be able to eliminate three of the four answers simply by using your prediction. On more difficult questions, however, your prediction will help you get rid of one or two answer choices, and then you’ll need to consider the remaining answers a little more carefully. If you’ve narrowed it down to two answer choices and they both seem to make sense, you’re probably down to the right answer and the trap answer. Luckily, we know some common traps that the test writers use, and they include the following:

Being aware of these traps will help you spot them on the SAT and therefore avoid them.

Predictions and POE

Use these criteria after you have eliminated any answer choice that doesn’t match your prediction.

USING THE BASIC APPROACH

Now that you know the steps of the Basic Approach, let’s practice them on specific question types: infer/imply/suggest questions and vocabulary-in-context questions.

Infer/Imply/Suggest

When you see a question that contains the word infer, imply, or suggest, be extra careful. In real life, those words often signify a question asking your opinion. You may think that the test writers want you to do some English-class-level reading between the lines, but they don’t. It’s still just a reading comprehension question. You may have to do some reading between the lines, as the answer will not be directly stated in the text as it usually is with detail questions; but there will still be plenty of evidence in the text to support the correct answer.

13. The author’s statement that the “country moved on to building backyard fallout shelters” (lines 31–32) implies that Americans

A) were aware that the threat from bombs was more imminent than that from windshield pitting.

B) had lost interest in the windshield pitting phenomenon.

C) needed a place to be protected from nuclear fallout.

D) did not yet have fallout shelters in their backyards.

Here’s How to Crack It

First, you need to go back to the text and find the line reference. Underline it. Then mark and read your window. Make sure you know what the question is asking. In this case, you want to figure out what the line reference tells you about Americans. When you carefully read your window you see that as summer rolled on, reports of pitting decreased everywhere and the country moved on. They are leaving the mystery of pitting behind. Once you have your prediction, use POE to work through your answers. Choice (A) doesn’t match the idea of Americans moving on, so eliminate it. Choice (B) looks pretty good, so hang on to it. Choice (C) might look good initially because we did see something earlier about nuclear fallout, but it has nothing to do with moving on from the pitting phenomenon, so you can eliminate it. Choice (D) might make sense—if they are building the shelters, they probably don’t have them already—but it has nothing to do with our prediction. That leaves (B), which answers the question and matches the prediction from the text!

Line Reference Questions

On any line reference question, you need to go back to the passage and find the line reference, mark it, and then read your window.

Vocabulary-in-Context

Another way that your reading comprehension will be tested is with vocabulary-in-context (VIC) questions. The most important thing to remember is that these are IN CONTEXT! Gone are the days of “SAT vocabulary” when you had to memorize lists of obscure words like impecunious and perspicacious. Now the focus is on whether you can understand what a word means based on the context of the passage. You’ll see words that look familiar, but are often used in ways that are a little less familiar. Do not try to answer these questions simply by defining the word in your head and looking for that definition. You have to go back to the text and look at the context for the word.

14. As used in line 41, “common” most nearly means

A) tasteless.

B) popular.

C) frequent.

D) inferior.

Here’s How to Crack It

With VIC questions, you don’t need to read a full 10–12 line window. Typically, a few lines before and a few lines after will give you what you need. Go to line 41 and find the word common. Underline it. When you read before and after the word, the text talks about a numbers game and more people. The next sentence says that something infrequent may start to appear to be a trend. Use those context clues to predict something that refers to numbers game, more people, and something that would be the opposite of infrequent. Put in something like “often” and then use POE to eliminate (A), (B), and (D).

VIC Questions

For vocab questions, there’s no need for you to read 10–12 lines to figure out the context in which the word is being used. Instead, read a few lines above and a few lines below the word to find context clues, and then apply POE, as shown here in question 14.

Be careful with VIC questions. As with the other questions, you have to rely heavily on the text, not your own opinions. You might be able to rather convincingly talk yourself into the idea that if something is common, it’s popular, because if it’s common, it’s everywhere, and if it’s everywhere, that must mean a lot of people like it. It can be easy to talk yourself into a tangle if you use your brain. Try to avoid that and instead focus on what the text actually says. In this case, you only have evidence for common having something to do with numbers and frequency, not how the general public feels about something.

Try another question:

15. The passage indicates that an effect of aggregating events is

A) patterns seem to emerge more frequently.

B) the truth about a conspiracy is easier to find.

C) a tiny percent of the events are similar.

D) connections between unrelated events can be reported.

Here’s How to Crack It

This question doesn’t have a line reference, but notice that both the question before it and the question after it do. Since question 14 references line 41, and question 18 references line 73, question 15 should fall somewhere between those lines. Look through those lines for the lead words aggregating events and use that phrase to find your window. Carefully read the window, looking for the answer to the question, “What is an effect of aggregating events?” Within the window, you find something that is very infrequent may start to appear to be a trend and [i]f everyone is looking for and reporting it, it would appear to be a conspiracy of some sort. Go through the answer choices and eliminate those that have nothing to do with appearing to be a trend or conspiracy.

POE in Action

Questions 15 and 18 are additional examples of how to apply POE for different types of questions.

Choice (A) definitely seems to match an appearing trend, so hang on to it.

Choice (B) mentions finding a conspiracy, which might seem to match.

Choice (C) doesn’t match at all, so eliminate it.

Choice (D) might be true, but doesn’t match the prediction, so eliminate it.

Based on our first pass through the answer choices, you are now down to (A) and (B). Remember the POE criteria? Take a closer look at these two answer choices.

Choice (A): patterns seem to emerge more frequently is almost an exact paraphrase of something…may start to appear to be a trend, so this one still looks pretty good.

Choice (B): Although the word conspiracy appears in both the text and the answer choice, don’t forget that you need to read carefully. The text says that it would appear to be a conspiracy, which is much different from finding the truth about a conspiracy. Don’t be deceived by deceptive language! Match content, not just words. Choice (B) is out, leaving (A) as the correct answer.

Let’s try one more.

18. The author most likely mentions War of the Worlds in line 73 in order to

A) argue some cases of mass hysteria are legitimate.

B) prove the media was responsible for people’s reactions.

C) point out that most people were not upset by the broadcast.

D) criticize the media for failing to recognize the program was fictional.

Here’s How to Crack It

Find your window and carefully read it, looking for the answer to the question, “Why does the author mention War of the Worlds?” When you read your window, you find that the author says War of the Worlds is a wonderful example of how the media emphasizes the few ‘real cases’ of hysteria without recognizing that the vast majority of people knew that the radio program was fictional and did nothing. You are looking for an answer choice that has something to do with the media overplaying the hysteria and not acknowledging the majority of people who did nothing.

Choice (A): This doesn’t match our prediction. Also, don’t be deceived by deceptive language! Notice that, in the text, “real cases” is in quotation marks. This indicates the author doesn’t agree with the phrase, so it’s the opposite of what you’re looking for.

Choice (B): Doesn’t match the prediction.

Choice (C): That almost exactly matches the second part of the prediction, so hang on to it.

Choice (D): Doesn’t match the prediction. It was people who didn’t know the program was fictional, not the media.

That leaves (C) as the correct answer!

So, you can see that by following the Basic Approach, you’ll be in good shape to answer a majority of the Reading questions! You’ll use your time more efficiently, focusing on the pieces of the test that will get you points, and your accuracy will be much higher. There are a few other question types which we’ll look at in the next chapter.

Summary