Contrasting Classical and Operant Conditioning

Flip It Video: Associative Learning Principles

Both classical and operant conditioning are forms of associative learning. Both involve acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery, generalization, and discrimination. But these two forms of learning also differ. Through classical (Pavlovian) conditioning, we associate different stimuli we do not control, and we respond automatically (respondent behaviors) (Table 28.1). Through operant conditioning, we associate our own behaviors—which act on our environment to produce rewarding or punishing stimuli (operant behaviors)—with their consequences.

TABLE 28.1 Comparison of Classical and Operant Conditioning

Classical Conditioning Operant Conditioning
Basic idea Learning associations between events we do not control. Learning associations between our behavior and its consequences.
Response Involuntary, automatic. Voluntary, operates on environment.
Acquisition Associating events; NS is paired with US and becomes CS. Associating a response with a consequence (reinforcer or punisher).
Extinction CR decreases when CS is repeatedly presented alone. Responding decreases when reinforcement stops.
Spontaneous recovery The reappearance, after a rest period, of an extinguished CR. The reappearance, after a rest period, of an extinguished response.
Generalization The tendency to respond to stimuli similar to the CS. Responses learned in one situation occurring in other, similar situations.
Discrimination Learning to distinguish between a CS and other stimuli that do not signal a US. Learning that some responses, but not others, will be reinforced.

As we shall see next, our biology and cognitive processes influence both classical and operant conditioning.