Sex is not like hunger, because it is not an actual need. Yet sex motivates. Had this not been so for all your ancestors, you would not be alive and reading these words. Sexual motivation is nature’s clever way of making people procreate, thus enabling our species’ survival. Life is sexually transmitted.
Among the forces driving sexual behavior are the sex hormones. The main male sex hormone is testosterone. The main female sex hormones are the estrogens, such as estradiol. Sex hormones influence us at many points in the life span:
“ Nature often equips life’s essentials—sex, eating, nursing—with built-in gratification.”
Frans de Waal, “Morals Without God?,” 2010
In most mammals, nature neatly synchronizes sex with fertility. Females become sexually receptive when their estrogens peak at ovulation, and researchers can cause female animals to become receptive by injecting them with estrogens. Male hormone levels are more constant, and hormone injection does not so easily affect the sexual behavior of male animals (Piekarski et al., 2009). Nevertheless, male hamsters that have had their testosterone-making testes surgically removed will gradually lose much of their interest in receptive females. They gradually regain it if injected with testosterone.
Hormones do influence human sexual behavior, but more loosely. Researchers are exploring and debating whether women’s mate preferences change across the menstrual cycle, especially at ovulation, when both estrogens and testosterone rise (Gildersleeve et al., 2014; Haselton & Gildersleeve, 2011, 2016; Wood et al., 2014a).
Women have much less testosterone than men do. And more than other mammalian females, women are responsive to their testosterone level (Davison & Davis, 2011; van Anders, 2012). If a woman’s natural testosterone level drops, as happens with removal of the ovaries or adrenal glands, her sexual interest may wane. And as experiments with surgically or naturally menopausal women have demonstrated, testosterone-replacement therapy can often restore diminished sexual activity, arousal, and desire (Braunstein et al., 2005; Buster et al., 2005; Petersen & Hyde, 2011).
In human males with abnormally low testosterone levels, testosterone-replacement therapy often increases sexual desire and also energy and vitality (Khera et al., 2011). But normal fluctuations in testosterone levels, from man to man and hour to hour, have little effect on sexual drive (Byrne, 1982). Indeed, male hormones sometimes vary in response to sexual stimulation (Escasa et al., 2011). In one study, Australian skateboarders’ testosterone surged in the presence of an attractive female, contributing to riskier moves and more crash landings (Ronay & von Hippel, 2010). Thus, sexual arousal can be a cause as well as a consequence of increased testosterone levels.
Large hormonal surges or declines affect sexual desire in shifts at two predictable points in the life span, and sometimes at an unpredictable third point:
To summarize: We might compare human sex hormones, especially testosterone, to the fuel in a car. Without fuel, a car will not run. But if the fuel level is minimally adequate, adding more won’t change how the car runs. The analogy is imperfect, because hormones and sexual motivation interact. However, it correctly suggests that biology is a necessary but incomplete explanation of human sexual behavior. The hormonal fuel is essential, but so are the psychological stimuli that turn on the engine, keep it running, and shift it into high gear.
The scientific process often begins with simple surveys of behavior, such as Indiana University biologist Alfred Kinsey did in questioning Americans about their sexuality and writing about their experiences. And then it moves to direct observations of complex behaviors. When gynecologist-obstetrician William Masters and his collaborator Virginia Johnson (1966) applied this process to human sexual intercourse in the 1960s, they made headlines. They recorded the physiological responses of volunteers who came to their lab to masturbate or have intercourse. (The volunteers, 382 females and 312 males, were a somewhat atypical sample, consisting only of people able and willing to display arousal and orgasm while scientists observed). Their description of the sexual response cycle identified four stages: