The R1-fractional trigonometry [73–75] is defined by taking the parameter a in the argument of the R-function to be imaginary. This is in contrast to Chapter 5 in which both the a and t parameters were taken to be real. Then, the R1-trigonometry is based on , where R-function is expanded into even and odd series, that is, series with terms that are even and odd powers of a. This yields
We define to be the even part of , that is, the terms in equation (6.1) with even powers of a, and to be the odd part of , that is, the terms in equation (6.1) with odd powers of a. Then, we have and from equation (6.3). Therefore, -function is defined as the real part of equation (6.1) and the -function as the imaginary part. Because t is raised to a fractional power in these series, the series are multivalued or indexed. To elucidate the indexed behavior of these functions, we consider the roots of t. Then, from equation (3.122),
where for the exponent of t is
where and are assumed rational and irreducible, , and M/D is rational and in minimal form. From Lorenzo and Hartley [74], with permission of Springer:
Then, the multivalued, or indexed, definition for the is given by
with , , with common factors in M/D removed. The and are defined in a similar manner
with , and
The principal -generalized trigonometric functions are real functions of the real variable t. They are obtained by taking , in equations ((6.4)–(6.6). Thus,
and
where the simplified notation introduced earlier is used for the principal, k = 0, functions. These functions, equations (6.4)–(6.9), are generalizations of the circular functions (also known as harmonic functions) of the classical integer-order trigonometry. The indexed behavior seen in equations (6.4)–(6.6) has no parallel in the classical trigonometry. We note, when q = 1 and v = 0, the -trigonometric functions revert back to the circular functions for t > 0.
The principal -trigonometric functions are shown in Figures 6.1a, b and 6.2 for various values of q. As the value of q decreases from 1 to 0.1, the oscillatory nature of the - and -functions is also seen to decrease. For q < 1, it can also be seen that the curves tend to zero as t increases. The functions grow at an increasing rate, as q increases for values of q > 1 (not shown). For smaller values of q in the to range, the lack of zero crossings of the -function strongly affects the behavior of the -function.
Figures 6.3–6.8 show the effects of the a parameter on the R1Cos-, R1Sin-, and the -functions, respectively. Increasing the a parameter increases the response rate of the function. In other words, increasing a decreases the apparent period and increases the overshoot. The reader should also consider the effect of the order variable q in these figures. For the and the , it also increases the response rate. For the , it changes the character of the response.
Figures 6.9–6.14 show the effects of secondary order parameter v on the R1Cos-, R1Sin-, and -functions, respectively. In general, increasing v tends to increase the rate of response of the functions and reduce the period. From the Laplace transforms of the functions (Section 6.5), it is clear that v > 0 fractionally differentiates the v = 0 function, while v < 0 integrates it. The effect of v reduces the period of the -function; this is shown clearly in Figure 6.14.
Figure 6.15 shows the phase plane for variations in the order q, with a = 1.0, v = 0.0, and k = 0. Note that for q < 1 the functions are attracted to the origin from infinity, while for q > 1, the functions start at the origin and spiral out to infinity.
From the definitions (6.4) and (6.5), we have that
and
These results substituted into equation (6.6) yield
Using the definitions (6.4) and (6.5) with equation (6.3) gives
which is a fractional Euler equation for the R1-trigonometry. Expanding in the same manner as done for equation (6.3) yields
a complementary fractional Euler equation. The addition of equations (6.13) and (6.14) gives
If we subtract equation (6.15) from (6.14), we have
Both equations (6.15) and (6.16) are the fractional generalizations of the classical equations (1.18) and (1.19), respectively. Based on the definitions of the -trigonometric functions, we have
another R-function expression. Combining this with equation (6.15) gives
Similarly, we have
taken with equation (6.16) yields
A similar relation for the may be obtained from the ratio of equations (6.18) and (6.21), that is,
The addition of the squares equations (6.15) and (6.16) gives
a fractional-order generalization of the classical identity . Because the right-hand side of this identity is a real number, this complex R product behaves like the multiplication of complex conjugates.
In a similar manner, the subtraction of the square of equation (6.16) from the square of equation (6.15) gives
Figure 6.16 shows the value of the product for a range of q and t values. This is a generalization of the identity . Figure 6.17 shows the value of the conjugate sum for a range of q and t values. The substitution of equations (6.18) and (6.21) into (6.13) gives
the fractional Euler equation in an exponential form. Note that for q = 1/2 and v = 0,
Furthermore, with a = 1, we have
A relationship between the -function and the -function is easily determined. Based on equation (6.4)
Thus,
Conversely,
The substitution into the defining series for the fractional trigonometric functions gives
and
demonstrating backward compatibility to common trigonometry.
The relationship between the R1-hyperbolic and the R1-trigonometric functions may be determined by appropriate substitutions into the defining series. It is clear from equations (5.21) and (6.17) that
and conversely
From equations (5.22) and (6.21), we have that
and conversely
These relationships between R1-hyperbolic and R1-trigonometric functions exactly parallel and generalize those between the integer-order trigonometric functions (q = 1, v = 0) and classical hyperbolic functions.
This section determines fractional differintegrals of the principal fractional R-trigonometric functions. This section is from Lorenzo and Hartley [74], with permission of Springer:
The -order differintegral of is determined as follows: Differintegrating term-by-term (see Section 3.16) gives
Then applying equation (5.37), we have
Thus,
Applying equation (6.27), this may be written as
For , this becomes
The -order differintegral of , is determined as follows: We may differintegrate (6.26) term-by-term based on Section 3.16. Then, using equation (5.37)
Thus,
Applying equation (6.27), this may be written as
and for , we have the important case
Because the series are uniformly convergent (see Chapter 14), the Laplace transforms for the principal -trigonometric functions are readily determined by transforming the defining infinite series term-by-term.
Then, the transform of equation (6.4) is
Inverse transforming term-by-term (see Section 3.16),
where and . Thus,
Replacing cos and sin with exponential forms,
Now,
therefore, we have
where and . For the principal function,
Determination of this transform proceeds in a similar manner as that for the ; thus,
From Section 3.16, we may transform term-by-term; thus,
where and . Thus,
Replacing cos and sin with exponential forms,
Now applying equation (6.47), we have
where and . For the principal function,
The principal -trigonometric and -hyperbolic functions, their defining series, Laplace transforms, and R-function relationships are presented in Table 6.1 along with those of the classical circular functions.
Source: Lorenzo and Hartley 2004b [74]. Adapted with permission of Springer.
In Section 6.1, fractional trigonometric functions that parallel the familiar classical trigonometric functions were derived based on the parity-based series (equation (6.2). In this section, we shall consider complexity-based functions starting from equation (6.1). Equation (6.1) can be written as
Furthermore, we have that
a complex plane version of the R-function. Because the results are R-functions which have been studied earlier, we do not pursue this area further.
Continuing from Ref. [74], with permission of Springer:
The -trigonometric functions may also be solutions to fractional differential equations. This transform (equation (6.49) indicates that the uninitialized fractional differential equation
has a solution of the form
when , that is, an impulse function. As with the -hyperbolic functions for arbitrary , the solution is given by the convolution
Assuming composition equation (6.58) may also be written in the form of a fractional integro-differential equation, namely
In a similar manner, equation (6.54) indicates that the uninitialized fractional differential equation
has a solution of the form
when , that is, an impulse function. For arbitrary , the solution is obtained by the convolution similar to equation (6.60). Equation (6.61) may also be written as a fractional integro-differential equation, namely
Linear combinations of fractional trigonometric functions may also be used to infer solutions for fractional differential forms of noncommensurate order. For example, from the linear combination
or using the relationships (6.17) and (6.20)
we may infer the Laplace transformed equation
or
From this, it is seen that the uninitialized fractional differential equation
where
will have a solution of the form given by equation (6.64). Various specializations of the orders and parameters lead to other useful results. Still more varied fractional differential equations may be obtained by considering linear combinations of the both the R1-trigonometric functions and the -hyperbolic functions, using, for example, forms such as
Chapter 7 explores the effect of imaginary t in the definition of a fractional trigonometry.