Starring: |
Henry Thomas, Drew Barrymore, Peter Coyote |
Directed by: |
Steven Spielberg |
Viewed by the Reagans: |
June 27, 1982 |
The Film That Made the Reagans Cry
A lot of what was happening on Earth in the days before the president and Mrs. Reagan hosted a screening of E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial at the White House probably made a science-fiction movie about life on another planet appealing to many of the people there.
It started with Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin’s visit to Washington. Ronald Reagan was unalterably committed to the well-being of Israel and its people. He understood the alliance’s strategic importance to the United States, but well beyond that, he understood the historic significance and imperative of the right of the state of Israel to exist in peace. Israel’s safety was nonnegotiable to him. But Menachem Begin was not the easiest man to like, even for strong supporters of Israel. The discussions President Reagan had with the prime minister that day were exasperating.
The administration’s concerns about Israel’s strong response to the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) shelling of Israeli villages was the issue. In retaliation for repeated attacks by PLO forces in southern Lebanon, Israel invaded and briefly occupied southern Lebanon until the PLO left. The president’s public comments after their meeting telegraphed the tension. In uncharacteristically brief remarks to the press, Reagan said that it had been merely “worthwhile” to have Begin at the White House again. Ouch. Everyone knew that was diplomat speak for contentious.
Reagan’s private diary entries offer more illumination. The president described himself as being “pretty blunt” about his concerns but that Begin came back with a “defense.” Sounds like an argument. The president’s notes went on to refer to the matter as “a complex problem,” saying: “In the larger meetings with his people and ours, we went at it again. He’s adamant against our proposal to sell arms to Jordan. My argument is we’re trying to create more ‘Egypts’ who’ll make peace with Israel. He refuses to believe another Arab state will do what Egypt did.” Ronald Reagan’s last word on that meeting says it all: “Frustrating.” That was Monday. Quite a beginning to the week.
Storm clouds arrived that Wednesday. The president met with Secretary of State Alexander Haig, whose arrogance, constant complaints, and refusal to cooperate with the White House staff had become a problem. From his bizarre (and constitutionally incorrect) behavior announcing himself “in charge” in the White House after the president had been wounded by a would-be assassin’s bullet, to his whining about what helicopters he was assigned to ride, Haig had alienated virtually everyone at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. The president knew a change had to be made and wrote in his diary, “I was prepared for Al to resign.” But Haig did not make it easy, complaining to the president about a number of things, almost all of which related to perceived slights and other minor issues. Reagan referred to it as “a bill of particulars,” which he promised to review. In a rare, but telling, note of exasperation, Ronald Reagan penned in his diary for that day: “I’m ready for Camp David.”
Friday was a predictably grim day at the White House, as the president accepted Haig’s resignation. The drama was over. There were no wet eyes among the White House staff when Ronald Reagan walked into the Press Briefing Room that afternoon to announce Haig was out and former labor and treasury secretary and Office of Management and Budget director George P. Shultz would replace him. The president was gracious to Haig in his public statements, but in his diary, he referred to the ordeal as “a heavy load.” Although Ronald Reagan respected the service that the highly decorated veteran of both the Korean and Vietnam Wars had rendered to his country, enough was enough.
Some may consider George Shultz to have been a terrific Secretary of State, but he was not always nice to the president’s staff, at least not the mid-level and junior staff. Simply put, he could be rude. He often treated me and others like we were furniture. Not worth acknowledging.
I am certain the Reagans were not aware of how Shultz treated us. Had they been, I am sure they would have passed the word to him to behave appropriately. Regardless, I eventually got to tell Mrs. Reagan about it and was more than happy to do so.
In 1989 or 1990, we were on an airplane traveling somewhere, and Mrs. Reagan mentioned George Shultz’s name. I either rolled my eyes or curled my lip to indicate my dislike, which Mrs. Reagan saw and chose not to ignore. “Mark,” she said in a tone a bit less than warm, “what’s the issue with George?” I knew she liked him (he kissed up to her shamelessly), so I took a deep breath and decided to tell her. “Well, Mrs. Reagan,” I began, “you know how no matter how busy or preoccupied you or your husband could be, that you never, ever failed to smile and say hello to people when you saw them?” She smiled and said, “Yes.”
“George is not that way.” She raised her eyebrows and said “Oh?” in a very skeptical tone. So I explained: “Yes, George walks right by people and ignores them, even if they say hello. Sometimes he just looks at people and says nothing. Nothing. Even if they say hello first. That is, unless you happen to be a pretty woman or someone very powerful. Then he has all the time in the world for you,” I said. She laughed.
“But Mrs. Reagan,” I said, “if the most important and busy man and woman in the world always had time to be courteous to people, why couldn’t he?”
She paused. “Yes, well, you may have a point.” From then on, every time we were with George Shultz, Mrs. Reagan would look at me, raise her eyebrows, and smile.
As Ronald Reagan entered the second year of his presidency, his widespread popularity among the American people had begun to decline. This leveling was common after a president’s first year in office, but it reminded Reagan of how fleeting a sense of unity in America could be. Undeterred, he looked for new opportunities to transcend typical partisan divisions and inspire the nation. He identified one such opportunity in the Space Shuttle Program in the summer of 1982.
To maximize its impact, Reagan wanted the American people to feel that the Shuttle Program belonged to them rather than to the government. This task was well suited to his unique gifts as a communicator. His speech declaring the first space shuttle operational could have easily been given from the Oval Office or the press room at NASA’s headquarters, but he delivered it instead on the tarmac at Edwards Air Force Base in California after the space shuttle Columbia landed from its test mission.
He made sure it happened on the Fourth of July, when people would be off from work and feeling their most patriotic. The event turned into a remarkable spectacle. A half million Americans came to the Southern California desert to watch the Columbia land, including forty-five thousand who overflowed onto the ramps and taxiways at the Dryden Flight Research Center to hear the president speak.
The White House advance team had worked hard to create an event that would showcase the best of the president’s onstage skills as a communicator, with a little bit of drama. Some might call it a Hollywood touch. In addition to christening Columbia, the purpose of the event was to introduce America to its second space shuttle, the Challenger. When Reagan reached the part in his speech referencing the future of the Shuttle Program, a jetliner carrying the Challenger on its back thundered overhead with precision. As the crowd roared, he leaned into the microphone and boomed, “Where we’re going to go in the future is something that depends on you.” His message resonated deeply with a country already transfixed on the wonders of space.
Following America’s victory in the space race of the 1960s, defined by our being the first (and only) country to land men on the moon and bring them back safely, the United States and the Soviet Union had spent a decade trading off on a series of remarkable achievements, from orbital space stations, to unmanned Mars landings, to flybys of Jupiter and Saturn. As these captured the attention of the public, an appetite developed for movies, music, and books that could transport anyone, not just NASA astronauts, into the far reaches of space. Perhaps the most notable cultural touchstone from the era was Star Wars, which broke the record for highest-grossing film of all time upon its release in 1977. Five years later, however, Star Wars’s record would be surpassed by another film—one that, as if to complement Reagan’s own efforts, took all the mystery and enchantment of space and placed it in the heart of the American suburbs.
On June 27, 1982, one week before the event at Edwards Air Force Base—and the day of Columbia’s launch—a star-studded group of Washington and Hollywood veterans sat with the Reagans at the White House to watch a new film titled E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. This was an unusual occurrence, as the president and Mrs. Reagan customarily watched movies at Camp David with a small circle of aides.
Its director, Steven Spielberg, and members of the cast were there. Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon, and several other astronauts were also in attendance, as was the newest Supreme Court Justice, Sandra Day O’Connor. Several of the guests and luminaries had brought their young children. The atmosphere in the White House that evening was almost whimsical. Columbia’s successful launch hours earlier had been the perfect prelude, and now these influential Americans were gathered not for a stuffy state dinner but to watch a family film about a homesick alien.
In E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, a lonely middle child named Elliott discovers an equally lonely alien hiding in the shed in his suburban backyard. With the help of his teenage brother and younger sister, he brings it into his house and hides it from his mother. Over time Elliott’s friendship with the creature, which he names E.T., grows into a mysterious telekinetic connection in which he gets sick when E.T. is sick, sad when E.T. is sad, and even intoxicated when E.T. discovers beer in the family refrigerator. After government agents in full astronaut suits capture the alien, the children manage to help him escape just in time to meet the spaceship that’s come to take him home.
After the audience took their seats, Spielberg stood and introduced the film, calling it an ode to his childhood. He then sat beside the Reagans. As the film played, the president seemed enchanted, laughing at the charming dialogue and turning occasionally to whisper into Nancy’s ear. By the time the film reached its stirring emotional send-off, both he and the First Lady were crying, as were many others in the audience.I Spielberg later recounted that the president was so moved toward the end that he “looked like a ten-year-old kid,” leaning forward in his seat as he watched.
E.T. struck me as fundamentally Reaganesque in tone and approach. Its wholesome depiction of Middle America, its impish sense of humor, and its subtle placement of the protagonist in opposition to the government aligned with his identity. After the closing credits, President Reagan stood and faced the crowd, searching from face to face for a moment to read reactions. “I wanted to thank you for bringing E.T. to the White House,” he said. “We really enjoyed your movie.” He paused before saying with a completely straight face: “And there are a number of people in this room who know that everything on that screen is absolutely true.”II
The audience broke out in laughter, but the seriousness of his delivery went on to spark rumors among self-proclaimed “UFOlogists” that Reagan had let slip a state secret about an alien encounter. The rumors persist to this day. In an interview in 2011, Spielberg confirmed the comment but stated, “I’m sorry to say I think he was simply trying to tell a joke.”
One guest at the event, Morgan Mason, had an interesting take on what Reagan was doing. I believe Morgan was the only Hollywood movie veteran to serve on Ronald Reagan’s White House staff. The son of Academy Award nominee and acclaimed actor James Mason and actress-screenwriter Pamela Mason, both born in England, Morgan had appeared in Hero’s Island, along with his father, when he was just seven, and in The Sandpiper with Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton three years later. In 1979 he joined Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign, despite his father’s advice to the contrary—“Oh, my dear boy, don’t be ridiculous; he doesn’t have a chance”—and, following Reagan’s decisive victory over incumbent president Jimmy Carter in 1980, was appointed deputy chief of protocol of the United States. Shortly thereafter, the president asked him to join the White House staff, where he served as special assistant to the president for political affairs. Morgan is married to Belinda Carlisle, lead vocalist of the all-female rock group the Go-Go’s. Their son, Duke, is also active in politics.
The Reagans liked Morgan so much that when he left the White House staff, they came to his farewell party at the home of Mike Deaver. Despite his pedigree, Morgan was neither pretentious nor arrogant. He was like a young Ronald Reagan: handsome, smart, charming, politically savvy, courteous to everyone, and had a wonderful sense of humor. Unlike many on the White House staff, Morgan was a person about whom no one had an unkind word.
And he was clever. Morgan once gave the Reagans a unique anniversary gift: the business card of the famed divorce attorney Marvin Mitchelson framed behind glass with a small hammer and a sign reading “Break in Case of Emergency!” Both Reagans howled with laughter when he presented it. On one occasion, Morgan was playing tennis on the White House court when Chief of Staff James A. Baker III called him. Baker was peeved that Mason was recreating instead of working at his desk. Baker told Morgan that he had “just been with your boss,” meaning White House Political Affairs Chief Edward J. Rollins. Without missing a beat, Mason replied, “Well, I was just with yours,” meaning Nancy Reagan. That was that.
Mason told me, “When I first got to the White House, one of my jobs was to arrange screenings in the family theater for movies such as E.T. and Victory,” which takes place in a Nazi POW camp during WWII. The camp commander (Max Von Sydow) organizes a soccer match between his German soldiers and the Allied POWs. It was directed by John Huston and also starred Michael Caine.
“We tried to get the key people to come—Steven Spielberg, Sylvester Stallone, Kirk Kerkorian, who on three separate occasions owned MGM Studios—like that. There was always an informal dinner afterward. Everyone was relaxed and had fun. I seem to recall that after seeing E.T., the president said something about how can we be one hundred percent sure that there are not other forms of life out there? A few people looked startled, and a few laughed politely, but I remember thinking how open-minded it was of him to acknowledge that possibility and not buy into the arrogance that we were the only living creatures ever.”
My view was that the president’s comment was almost certainly intended to draw laughter, but his serious delivery also made me think he was giving a gift to the children in the audience. Similar to the way a parent might confirm the existence of Santa Claus, Reagan was lending extra weight to the magic of the film for all those who wanted its magic to be real. He was also giving a wink to the filmmakers, indicating that their aim to inspire audiences was also his aim.
E.T., of course, did succeed—wildly. And not just in ticket sales but also in leaving a sizeable cultural footprint. It introduced to science fiction the idea that alien visitors need not be evil conquerors but might instead be cosmic companions.III This seemingly new concept was a refreshing twist for many filmgoers who were drawn to the subject matter of space and extraterrestrials but burned out by the pervasive darkness of such films.
Spielberg’s intention, however, was never to revolutionize science fiction. It was to capture the essence of childhood. He was inspired to make E.T. by experiences he had in his own childhood after his parents’ divorce, when he was beset by feelings of loneliness and would cope by retreating into his imagination. The choice of an alien companion at the film’s center—as opposed to, say, a golden retriever or an orca whale, as in other children’s films with similar narrative arcs—was a function of the space-crazy era in which the film was released.
“I wanted E.T. to become a kind of conscience and companion to kids growing up in the eighties,” Spielberg said once. “In the fifties, I had Jiminy Cricket and Winnie-the-Pooh as imaginary sidekicks and preceptors. They were creatures who outlived their original contexts, and I hope the same thing happens with E.T.”IV
Spielberg used a variety of techniques to pull the audience back into childhood, including shooting most scenes from a low vantage point. He also took the time to develop the ancillary characters in Elliott’s family. They span different ages and filter the story’s central theme—Elliott’s attachment to E.T.—through their own complex points of view. This multigenerational approach gives older audience members a way to relate to the story without relying exclusively on their memories of being Elliott’s age.
Watching Elliott, we witness his first-time struggle with feelings of loss and abandonment. E.T.’s role in Elliott’s life grows from being like a pet, to like a friend, to like a stand-in parent or mentor. When E.T. appears to have died and his telekinetic connection with Elliott seems severed, Elliott says, “I must be dead, because I don’t know how to feel.”
Meanwhile, Elliott’s teenage brother, Mike, allows us to see the events unfold from a slightly older perspective. Mike has a scene in which he’s talking with one of the scientists who set up shop at the family’s home. He explains Elliott’s connection with E.T. this way:
SCIENTIST: |
You said it has the ability to manipulate its own environment? |
MICHAEL: |
He’s smart. He communicates through Elliott. |
SCIENTIST: |
Elliott thinks its thoughts? |
MICHAEL: |
No. Elliott feels his feelings. |
After this exchange, Mike withdraws into a closet full of stuffed animals, toys, and comics that he’s clearly outgrown. With tears in his eyes, he pulls his knees up to his chest and falls asleep on the floor, having retreated one more time into the comfort of childhood.
In the film’s emotional final scene, even adult characters such as Elliott’s mother and the government agents become teary-eyed at the relationship between Elliott and E.T. They watch as the two stand outside the spaceship and labor through an anguished good-bye. E.T. points a glowing finger at Elliott’s forehead and says, “I will be right here.” The audience senses that Elliott is saying good-bye to part of his childhood as much as to a friend. We see even the cold and anonymous government agents won over by E.T.’s magic.
As the highest officeholder in the United States government, President Reagan had to have identified with the government agents portrayed as antagonists throughout the film. His infamous comment about everything on the screen being true showed how aware he was that, in the minds of many Americans, he was the ultimate authority on whether the government was hiding anything about its knowledge of space.
He viewed the movie, however, not just from the perspective of a sitting president but also as a veteran of the movie business. In a conversation after the screening, President Reagan told Spielberg that E.T. had left him feeling nostalgic, not about childhood but about a simpler time in filmmaking.
“I only have one criticism of your movie,” he said. “How long were the end credits?”
“Oh, I don’t know,” Spielberg replied. “Maybe three, three and a half minutes.”
Reagan was unimpressed. “In my day, when I was an actor, our end credits were maybe fifteen seconds long. Three and a half minutes, that’s fine—but only show that inside the industry. Throughout the rest of the country, reduce your credits to fifteen seconds at the end.”
His point was that people in the filmmaking business would be interested in seeing their names and those of their colleagues, but the rest of the country would not.
Nancy intervened before Spielberg had the chance to respond. “Oh, Ronnie,” she said. “They can’t do that. You know that.”
“Oh, yes, yes,” the president sighed. “I suppose.”V
It’s a humorous conversation in hindsight, but it also showed the way Reagan’s mind worked when viewing films. He watched them as a student of the craft. He came from a less technically advanced time in moviemaking, when crews didn’t consist of the visual effects artists and hordes of specialized technicians needed to make E.T. Spielberg, on the other hand, was of a new generation in Hollywood. He understood that big effects were the draw for audiences, even if the smaller human moments were still what kept them in their seats.
As the director intended, the science-fiction elements of the film connected it to kids growing up in the eighties. He further appealed to them with references to other popular sci-fi space adventures throughout. In an early interaction between Elliott and E.T., Elliott shows off a series of Star Wars action figures. Later on, E.T. is trick-or-treating, disguised by a white sheet, and tries to chase after a child in a Yoda costume, saying “Home . . . home . . . home.” Near the film’s end, Elliott explains to a neighborhood boy that E.T. needs to get to a spaceship. “Well, can’t he just beam up?” the boy asks, in reference to existing sci-fi clichés. Elliott’s impatient reply: “This is reality, Greg.”
A sense of reality, it seems, is what audiences were craving from the science-fiction genre.
The flight of the space shuttle one week after the screening of E.T. was a moment of unity for the country. It continued to inspire Americans in the coming years, and the administration kept searching for methods of involving the American people, including children, in the program.
The Shuttle Student Involvement Program was one such method. It gave students the opportunity to propose experiments to be performed by astronauts in space. Reagan also had far bigger ideas. He was determined to see a civilian launched into space before the end of his second term. He believed that was a way to truly give the American people a stake in the Shuttle Program.
In 1984 he proposed the Teachers in Space Project. “I am directing NASA to begin the search in all of our elementary and secondary schools,” the president said, “and to choose as the first citizen passenger in the history of our space program one of America’s finest: a teacher. I can’t think of a better lesson for our children and our country.”
After more than eleven thousand applied, a high school social studies teacher from Concord, New Hampshire, named Christa McAuliffe was selected. What followed would be one of the greatest tragedies of the Reagan presidency. On January 28, 1986, just seventy-three seconds after it had launched, the Challenger exploded, killing Christa and the six other astronauts on board.
It was the worst disaster in NASA’s history and a heavy blow to the US space program. Yet with Christa on board, the deepest wound was to the American people. The shuttle that had been a source of inspiration since it first thundered overhead at Edwards Air Force Base in 1982 had become a source of heartbreak. The millions who had watched Christa’s training unfold suddenly felt no desire to follow in her footsteps. Reagan understood the challenge before him. This was a human tragedy more than a scientific disaster, and he needed to respond in kind.
He wanted, first of all, to speak to the millions of schoolchildren who had watched the disaster happen live. For many, it remains one of their earliest and most vivid memories. The gifted speechwriter Peggy Noonan went to work and drafted what would become defining words.
“I want to say something to the schoolchildren of America who were watching the live coverage of the shuttle’s takeoff,” the president said in his now-famous speech the evening of the disaster. “I know it is hard to understand, but sometimes painful things like this happen. It’s all part of the process of exploration and discovery.”
He also wanted to remind people that the Shuttle Program would remain a public endeavor, one for all to share in and experience. “We don’t hide our space program,” he said. “We don’t keep secrets and cover things up. We do it all up front and in public. That’s the way freedom is, and we wouldn’t change it for a minute. We’ll continue our quest in space. There will be more shuttle flights and more shuttle crews, and, yes, more volunteers, more civilians, more teachers in space. Nothing ends here; our hopes and our journeys continue.”
I. Janet Maslin, “Nation’s First Film-Goer Gets a Front-Row Seat,” New York Times online, April 21, 1983, www.nytimes.com/1983/04/21/us/nation-s-first-film-goer-gets-a-front-row-seat.html.
II. Alejandro Rojas, “Spielberg Confirms Reagan’s Extraterrestrial Comment,” OpenMinds, last modified June 6, 2011, www.openminds.tv/spielberg-confirms-reagan-705/10057.
III. “New Releases: E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial,” Christian Science Monitor online, March 22, 2002, www.csmonitor.com/2002/0322/p14s01-almo.html.
IV. Gary Arnold, “ ‘E.T.: Steven Spielberg’s Joyful Excursion, Back to Childhood, Forward to the Unknown,” Washington Post online, June 6, 1982, www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/22/AR2005062201424.html.
V. Rojas, “Spielberg Confirms Reagan’s Extraterrestrial Comment.”