As archaeologists, we know that tracing origins of ideas and materials is challenging, especially when searching for a finite beginning. Tracing the origins of this volume is more like a genealogy. In certain ways, we might push the “prehistory” of this collaboration to 2002, when we first worked in the field together at Sylvester Manor, New York. A few of the themes highlighted in this volume were at least on the peripheries of our discussions of the complicated material culture, features, and overall layout of the plantation site; however, we had not yet a full appreciation of how complex the nature of colonialism was (and is) there. As we each headed off in different directions to complete various degrees, these discussions continued via email and conference meet-ups.
The project’s more immediate roots materialized as each of us began working on comparative colonialism in new settings. Kat joined the anthropology department at the University of Minnesota in 2008, and in 2012 Craig took a job overseas, in the University of Leicester’s School of Archaeology and Ancient History. Each of these places brought new awareness through new comparisons. For example, the colonial histories of New York and New England have radically different trajectories than those in Minnesota, and these differences are stark in terms of the contemporary political circumstances of American Indian tribes. When teaching a course titled Archaeologies of Colonialism with an explicitly comparative approach, moreover, Kat found that many undergraduates had difficulty even recognizing the United States as “colonial” beyond the struggles of colonists against the British crown authority. What sparked the students’ willingness to rethink the grounds of American colonialism were the comparative perspectives on Greek and Roman colonization, the Inca Empire, or the trade diaspora of Uruk. The contemporaneous contexts of Africa, Australia, and South America, with the complicated discourse of indigeneity, opened considerations of whether there are common practices for imposing or resisting colonial power and whether there are common outcomes.
In Leicester, Craig engaged with his new colleagues and was struck by the rich and diverse set of approaches that the School of Archaeology and Ancient History employed in studying the human past. The interdisciplinarity of the dialogues and debates that emerged on a regular basis in the department inspired him to consider the relevance (or lack thereof) that his work on colonialism in Native North American had for his new English colleagues working all across the globe, particularly those who studied colonialism, defined broadly. Some were reluctant to accept the definitions and theories that circulate in North American archaeology and especially the engagement with descendant communities. This made for a lively and arguably productive set of debates.
In January 2012, we began planning a large conference session devoted to comparative colonialism to draw on these insights. The occasion that presented itself was the 2013 Society for Historical Archaeology meetings, held at the University of Leicester. The location offered the opportunity to bring together scholars working in and on Old World and New World contexts. The session was designed to encourage direct engagement among scholars working on very different times and places but with potentially comparable interpretive themes, such as consumption, diaspora, critical approaches to temporality, stakeholders and descendants, and slavery. The symposium, titled “Entangling Colonial Narratives New and Old,” took place on January 10, 2013. It included papers by Craig Cipolla, Paul Mullins and Timo Ylimaunu, Per Cornell, Stephen Mrozowski, Katherine Hayes, Lucio Menezes Ferreira and Pedro Funari, Jane Webster, Richard Hingley, Christina Hodge, Diana Loren, and Patricia Capone, with Audrey Horning and Kent Lightfoot as discussants.
As the project moved toward the publishing phase, several participants had to drop out. Luckily, Peter Wells and Steve Silliman each agreed to join the project later and contribute to the book. Additionally, Rae Gould and Heather Law Pezzarossi agreed to co-author a chapter with Steve Mrozowski. We very much wanted the published chapters to continue in the spirit of comparative approaches by encouraging authors to engage with one another’s work. To that end, all the draft chapters were circulated among all the authors, not just the editors. As our authors revised, we saw that the original thematic pairings multiplied into connections across many chapters. The remnant of the thematic dialogues resides in the order of the volume chapters, but it became impossible to confine chapters to thematic sections. This, we felt, was part of the point. It has been an enormously satisfying process, and we hope to encourage this type of scholarly collaboration in future projects.
We each owe thanks for support and help in the unfolding of this volume. Craig received copyediting funds for this project from a European Commission Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (grant number 333909). Any findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the editors and authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. Both editors are grateful to Kelly Ferguson for painstakingly copyediting several drafts of each chapter. We also thank all session participants and chapter authors, Peter van Dommelen, and an anonymous reviewer for suggested improvements on the complete manuscript, along with Meredith Babb and Sonia Dickey at the University Press of Florida.
Craig thanks Kat for providing enthusiasm and hope when his was running low, his colleagues at the University of Leicester School of Archaeology and Ancient History for general support, and the Brothertown Indian Nation for participating in—and supporting—some of the research reported on in chapter 2. Special thanks are due to Kelly, Maya, and Pete for making England a home.
Kat thanks the University of Minnesota American Indian Studies Workshop and the Sociocultural Anthropology Brownbag group for critical comments on her chapter. She is also grateful to Craig for keeping the conversation going all these years and to John Matsunaga for keeping her going.