¹ [Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht (1798), Pt. I, Bk. I, sec. 5.]

² [“There is nothing in the mind that was not in the senses.” Cf. Leibniz, Nouveaux Essais sur l’Entendement humain, Bk. II, ch. 1, sec. 2, in response to Locke. The formula was scholastic in origin; cf. Duns Scotus, Super universalibus Porphyrii, qu. 3.]

³ [In Johannis Evang., XXXIV, 2. Cf. Symbols of Transformation (C.W., vol. 5), par. 162 and n. 69.]

⁴ [Cf. “The Realities of Practical Psychotherapy” (C.W., vol. 16, 2nd edn.), pars. 558ff.]

⁵ [What Jung may have had in mind are the melothesiae, explained in “Psychology and Religion” (C.W., vol. 11), par. 113, n. 5; cf. Psychology and Alchemy, fig. 156.]

⁶ [Psychological Types (C.W., vol. 6), Definition 47.]

⁷ [Ibid., Def. 53.]

⁸ [Ibid., Def. 5.]

⁹ [Ibid., Def. 21.]

¹⁰ [Ibid., Def. 44.]

¹¹ [Ibid., Def. 35.]

¹² [Ibid., Def. 30.]

¹³ [Ibid.]