INDEX
image
Page numbers refer to the print edition but are hyperlinked to the appropriate location in the e-book.
abortion, radical defense of, 92–93
absolute identity, 160
“altruistic personalities,” 127
amoralist, 63–64, 202n9
The Amoralist thought experiment: about, 2, 56–57; changing amoralists, 63–64; law of talion, 62; morally flawed actions, 60–62; morally neutral actions, 60; reasons for being moral, 57–59; universalization, 59–60
And If Sexuality Were Free? thought experiment, 104–6
anger module, 52
Anscombe, Elizabeth, 20–21, 196n7
applied ethics, defined, 181
Aquinas, Thomas, 28
aretists, xix, 8–10, 189, 304
Aristotle, xix, 164, 204n21
autonomy, ethics of, 51
 
“Baby Fae" affair, xi–xiv
Baertschi, Bernard, 196n7, 207n2
“behaviorist,” 143
behaviors, experiments on, xxii–xxiii, 3–5
Bentham, Jeremy, 81–82, 85
bodily form, social belonging and, 79–81
Bondolfi, Alberto, 79
Burgess, Anthony, 63
 
“character,” 123–24
The Child Who Is Drowning in a Pond thought experiment: about, 1, 160; intuition, 12–13; moral questions, 13; negative responsibility, 13; rule, 13; scenarios, 11–12
A Clockwork Orange (Burgess), 63
cloning, 98–99
community, ethics of, 51
compassion module, 52
compatibilism-incompatibilism, defined, 181–82
conceptual consistency, 60
conceptual problem, defined, xviii
Confronting a Furious Crowd thought experiment: explained, 1; scenarios, 17–23
consequentialism: defined, 182–83; explained, xix–xx
consequentialist intuitions, 32–33, 140–41
consequentialists, deontologists and, 36
construction of moral theories, moral intuitions in, 133
continuist, 77–78
conventions, domain of, 47, 176–78
Cosmides, Leda, 145
Cova, Florian, 198n11, 201n8, 208n3
critique of moral theories, moral intuitions in, 133
 
“democratized” thought experiment, 134–35
deontological intuitions, 34, 140–41
deontologism: defined, 183; explained, xix–xx
deontologists: consequentialists and, 36; on killing and letting die, 8–10
Diamond, Cora, 196n7
disgust module, 52
divinity, ethics of, 51–53
doctrine of double effect, 28–29, 35, 183–84
domain of conventions, 47, 176–78
domain of morality, 47, 176–78
double effect, doctrine of, 28–29, 35, 183–84
Dworkin, Ronald, 93
 
Emergencies thought experiment: explained, 1; scenarios, 7–8
emotional reactions, irrationality of, 152–53
emotions, role of, 33
epistemological limits, 136–37, 178
ethics: applied, 181; of autonomy, 51; of community, 51; of divinity, 51–53; morality and, 184; normative, 187; virtue, 3–4, 189
The Experience Machine thought experiment: about, 2, 65–70; scenarios, 67–70; tendency towards inertia, 67
experimental moral philosophy: about, 151–52; explained, x; irrationality of emotional reactions, 152–53
“experimental” philosophers, 137
experiments: on behaviors, xxii–xxiii, 3–5; “Life Raft,” 2
“externalists,” 185, 204n20
extinction, 85
 
facts, norms and, 184
Failure to Render Assistance to a Person in Danger scenario, 7
Faucher, Luc, 198n14
female genital mutilation, 53–55
Ferry, Luc, 78
Fodor, Jerry Alan, 144–45, 148, 149
Foot, Philippa, 25, 27–28
Francione, Gary, 86–87, 206n10
Frankenstein, Minister of Health thought experiment: explained, 3; scenarios, 94–99
A Furious Crowd scenario, 17
 
Goffi, Jean-Yves, 216n17
golden rule, 62
Greene, Joshua, 152, 198n11
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Kant), 203n11
Guichet, Jean-Luc, 80
 
Haidt, Jonathan, 48, 49, 50, 51–53
Hare, Richard, 85, 86, 206n10
harm, injuries and, 82–84
Harmann, Gilbert, 214n7
Hauser, Marc, 27, 31–32, 34, 35, 36
“human nature,” xxiii
Hume, David, 157, 214n4
“Hume’s guillotine.” See R1: One Cannot Derive an Ought from an Is
“Hume’s law.” See R1: One Cannot Derive an Ought from an Is
hypothesis: explained, xvii; justification of, xvii–xix
 
Incest in All Innocence thought experiment: ethics of autonomy, 51–53; ethics of community, 51–53; explained, 2; female genital mutilation, 53–55; maximalism, 47–49; minimalism, 45–47; naturalization of “minimalism” versus “maximalism” debate, 50; scenarios, 42–44; ‘victimless moral crimes,’ 44
incompatibilism, 181–82
“incompatibilist,” 111–12
individuals, species and, 79
inertia, tendency towards, 67
injuries, harm and, 82–84
innate morality, 142–44
instincts. See moral instincts
internalism-externalism, defined, 185
interpretation, 140–41
intuition. See also moral intuition: The Child Who Is Drowning in a Pond thought experiment, 12–13; consequentialist, 32–33, 140–41; deontological, 34, 140–41; “ordinary,” xx–xxi, 27; rules and, 131–33
Is a Short Mediocre Life Preferable to No Life at All? thought experiment, 2, 71–72
It Is Harder to Do Good Intentionally Than It Is to Do Evil thought experiment, 3, 107–8
I Would Have Preferred Never To Have Been Born thought experiment, 73–75
 
justification: about, 140; of hypothesis, xvii–xix; of moral theories, moral intuitions in, 133
 
Kant, Immanuel, xix, xxii, 14, 29, 59–60, 102, 183, 203n11
Kant’s razor, 161–62
The Killer Trolley thought experiment: explained, 1, 5; scenarios, 24–27
Killing the Pedestrian scenario, 78
Knobe, Joshua, 107–8
Kohlberg, Lawrence, 121, 201n13
 
law of talion, 62
learned morality, 142
“liberty,” “nature” and, 78
“Life Raft” experiments, 2
“limit” cases, 76–77
linguistics, 143
liquidation, 86–88
 
“marginal” cases, 76–77
maximalism: about, 47–49, 177; versus minimalism debate, 50
metaethics, defined, 185–86
method: about, 134–35; epistemological problems, 136–37; methodological problems, 135–36
method of reflective equilibrium, 164
methodological problems, 135–36
Milgram, Stanley, 4, 118, 119, 120, 121–22, 135
Mill, John Stuart, 54
minimalism: about, 45–47, 177; versus maximalism debate, 50
modularity, debate concerning, 148–49
modules, 52, 144–48
Monsters and Saints thought experiment, 112–28
moral arguments: elementary rules of, 163–72; reasons for being, 57–59; simplicity of, viii–ix
moral instincts: about, 142; good bye to, 149–50; innate morality, 142–44; learned morality, 142; modularity, 148–49; modules, 144–48; virtues and, 175–76
moral intuition: about, viii, 131, 138–40, 178–79; in construction, justification, and critique of moral theories, 133; defined, 186; elementary rules of, ix; fragility of, 39–41; interpretation, 140–41; justification, 140; poverty of, 37–39
morality: domain of, 47, 176–78; ethics and, 184; innate, 142–44; learned, 142; reasons for, 57–59; ways of conceiving, xix–xx; without “foundations,” 173–75
morally flawed actions, 60–62
morally neutral actions, 60
moral modules, defined, 186–87
moral questions, in The Child Who Is Drowning in a Pond thought experiment, 13
moral reasoning: elementary rules of, 154–62; rule of, 132; value of rules of, 133
moral rules, 45–46
moral theories: about, 176–78; critique of, 133; descriptions of, 193n16
Must We Eliminate Animals In Order To Liberate Them? thought experiment: about, 76–78; criteria, 81–82; criterion of pleasure and pain, 85–86; extinction, 85; individuals and species, 79; injuries and harm, 82–84; liquidation, 86–88; “nature” and “liberty,” 78; normative conclusions, 84–85; repugnant conclusion, 86; social belonging and bodily form, 79–81
 
naturalists, 164
naturalization, of minimalism versus maximalism debate, 50
“nature,” “liberty” and, 78
negative responsibility, in The Child Who Is Drowning in a Pond thought experiment, 13
nonmoral rules, 45–46
normative ethics, defined, 187
norms, facts and, 184
Nozick, Robert, 66
Nucci, Larry, 45–46
Nussbaum, Martha, 192n5
 
“One Cannot Derive an Ought from an Is.” See R1: One Cannot Derive an Ought from an Is
“ordinary intuitions,” xx–xxi, 27
“ought implies being able to.” See R2: Ought Implies Can
 
pain, criterion of pleasure and, 85–86
Parfit, Derek, 85
personal domain, 47, 176–78
personal perfection, xix–xx
philosophy, psychology and, xvi–xvii
Piaget, Jean, 201n13
Plato, xvi, 194n20
pleasure, criterion of pain and, 85–86
Poincaré, Henri, 157
Popper, Karl, 157, 158
positive discrimination, 77
pride module, 52
principle of reciprocity, 62
principle of revenge, 62
psychology, philosophy and, xvi–xvii
 
R1: One Cannot Derive an Ought from an Is: about, 12, 156–59; conflicts between R2: Ought Implies Can and, 166–68; questions about, 163–65
R2: Ought Implies Can: about, 12, 159–60; conflicts between R1: One Cannot Derive an Ought from an Is and, 166–68; questions about, 165–66
R3: Like Cases Must Be Treated Alike: about, 160; defending, 170–71; questions about, 168
R4: It Is Pointless to Oblige People to Do What They Will Necessarily Do of Their Own Accord; It Is Pointless to Prohibit People from Doing What They Will Not Willingly Do in Any Case: about, 161–62; questions about, 171–72
Rawls, John, 133, 164, 187–88, 191n2, 194n20
reality, thought experiments and, xv–xvi
reasoning. See moral reasoning
reflective equilibrium: defined, 187–88; method of, 164
religious theories, 176–78
The Republic (Plato), xvi
repugnant conclusion, 85, 86
respect module, 52
A Responsible Pilot scenario, 17–23
Righteous, the, 126, 127–28
rules: The Child Who Is Drowning in a Pond thought experiment, 13; intuition and, 131–33; nonmoral, 45–46; rule of moral reasoning, 132. See also moral rules
Russell, Bertrand, 164
 
scenarios: The Child Who Is Drowning in a Pond thought experiment, 11–12; Confronting a Furious Crowd thought experiment, 17–23; Emergencies thought experiment, 7–8; The Experience Machine thought experiment, 67–70; Failure to Render Assistance to a Person in
scenarios (continued) Danger, 7; Frankenstein, Minister of Health thought experiment, 94–99; A Furious Crowd, 17; Incest in All Innocence thought experiment, 42–44; The Killer Trolley thought experiment, 24–27; Killing the Pedestrian, 7–8; A Responsible Pilot, 17–23; A Transplant Gone Mad thought experiment, 15–16; A Violinist Has Been Plugged Into Your Back thought experiment, 91–92; We Are Free, Even If Everything Is Written In Advance thought experiment, 110; Who Am I Without My Organs? thought experiment, 100
Schindler, Oskar, 127
Schweder, R.A., 50
Searle, John, 157–58
Singer, Peter, viii–ix, 85, 132, 205n2
“situationism,” 123
“situationist” psychological theories, 123, 124, 125, 126
slippery slope: argument for, 168–70, 170–71; defined, 188
social belonging, bodily form and, 79–81
social theories, 176–78
“sorites,” 216n17
species, individuals and, 79
speciesists,” 77
submission to authority, 4
 
talion, law of, 62
Tappolet, Christine, 193n16
Theseus, 100–101
Thomson, Judith Jarvis, 25, 26–27, 27–28, 34, 41, 93
thought experiments: democratizing, xx–xxi; explained, xiv–xv; reality and, xv–xvi; use of, xi–xiv. See also specific thought experiments
Tooby, John, 145
A Transplant Gone Mad thought experiment: explained, 1; scenarios, 15–16
trolleyology, 5
Turiel, Elliot, 45–46, 48
 
universalization, 59–60
utilitarianism, 164, 188–89
The Utility Monster thought experiment, 2, 5, 89–90
 
victimless crimes, 189, 200n8
victimless moral crimes, 44, 48, 49
A Violinist Has Been Plugged Into Your Back thought experiment: about, 2–3, 160; radical defense of abortion, 92–93; scenarios, 91–92
virtue ethics, defined, 3–4, 189
virtues, moral instinct and, 175–76
 
Wason, Peter, 145
We Are Free, Even If Everything Is Written In Advance thought experiment: about, 103, 109; scenarios, 110
“Westernization,” 49
Who Am I Without My Organs? thought experiment: explained, 3; scenarios, 100
Williams, Bernard, 73–74, 169
 
Zimbardo, Philip, 4