Profitably Healthy Companies: Principles of Organizational Growth and Development

1. Freedman AM. The history of organization development and the NTL institute: What we have learned, forgotten, and rewritten. Psychologist Manager Journal 1999; 3(2): 125–41; French WL, Bell CH, Jr., Zawacki RA. Organization development: Theory, practice, and research. New Delhi: Universal Book Stall, 1978.

2. Burke WW. A perspective on the field of organization development and change: the Zeigarnik effect. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2011; 47(2): 143–67; Burke WW, Noumair DA. Organization development: A process of learning and changing, 3rd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Pearson, 2015.

3. Strogatz SH. Exploring complex networks. Nature 2001; 410(6825): 268–76.

4. Chapman J. Unintended consequences. Nursing Management 2005; 12(4): 30–4; Ben-Jacob E, Levine H. The artistry of nature. Nature 2001; 409(6823): 985–6.

5. Chapman. Unintended consequences.

6. Ben-Jacob, Levine. The artistry of nature.

7. Skaburskis A. The origin of “wicked problems.” Planning Theory and Practice 2008; 9(2): 277–80.

8. Leavitt HJ. Big organizations are unhealthy environments for human beings. Academy of Management learning and Education 2007; 6(2): 253–63; Miller D. The Icarus paradox: How exceptional companies bring about their own downfall. Business Horizons 1992; 35(1): 24–35.

9. Appelbaum SH. Socio‐technical systems theory: An intervention strategy for organizational development. Management Decision 1997; 35(6): 452–63.

10. Emery FE. Democratization of the work place: A historical review of studies. International Studies of Management and Organization: The Goals of Economic Organizations 1971; 1(2): 181–201.

11. Mills T. Altering the social structure in coal mining: A case study. Monthly Labor Review 1976; 99(10): 3–10.

12. I Love Lucy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmAwcMNxGqM.

13. McClure PK. “You’re fired,” says the robot: The rise of automation in the workplace, technophobes, and fears of unemployment. Social Science Computer Review 2018; 36(2): 139–56.

14. Binder AJ, Bound J. The declining labor market prospects of less-educated men. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2019; 33(2): 163–90.

15. Taylor, Winslow F. The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper, 1919; Parkhurst, Augustus F. Applied methods of scientific management. New York: Wiley, 1912.

16. Carey A. The Hawthorne studies: A radical criticism. American Sociological Review 1967; 32(3): 403–16; Bramel D, Friend R. Hawthorne, the myth of the docile worker, and class bias in psychology. American Psychologist 1981; 36(8): 867–78; Adair JG. The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology 1984; 69(2): 334–45.

17. Hsueh Y. The Hawthorne experiments and the introduction of Jean Piaget in American industrial psychology, 1929–1932. History of Psychology 2002; 5(2): 163–89; Lee RM. “The most important technique …”: Carl Rogers, Hawthorne, and the rise and fall of nondirective interviewing in sociology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 2011; 47(2): 123–46.

18. Massarik F. The humanistic core of industrial/organizational psychology. Humanistic Psychologist 1992; 20(2–3): 389–96.

19. Argyris C. The next challenge for TQM—taking the offensive on defensive reasoning. Journal for Quality and Participation 1999; 22(6): 41–43.

20. Argyris C. Double-Loop Learning, Teaching, and Research. Academy of Management learning & education 2002; 1(2): 206-18.

21. Senge PM. The leaders new work—building learning organizations. Sloan Management Review 1990; 32(1): 7–23.

22. Kezar A. What campuses need to know about organizational learning and the learning organization. New Directions for Higher Education 2005; 2005(131): 7–22.

23. Suchy Y. Executive functioning: Overview, assessment, and research issues for non-neuropsychologists. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2009; 37(2): 106–16.

24. Kantrow A. The constraints of corporate tradition. New York: Harper and Row, 1987.

25. Kelloway EK, Day AL. Building healthy workplaces: What we know so far. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 2005; 37(4): 223–35.

26. Korkmaz M. The effects of leadership styles on organizational health. Educational Research Quarterly 2007; 30(3): 23–55; Miles MB. Planned change and organizational health—figure and ground. In Carlson, RO et al. (Eds.) Change processes in the public schools (pp. 11–34). Eugene, OR: Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration, University of Oregon, 1965.

27. Sorohan EG. Healthy companies. Training and Development 1994; 48(3): 9–10; Quick JC, Macik-Frey M, Cooper CL. Managerial dimensions of organizational health: The healthy leader at work—Introduction. Journal of Management Studies 2007; 44(2): 189–205.

28. Highhouse S. A history of the T-group and its early applications in management development. Group Dynamics 2002; 6(4): 277–90; Burnes B, Cooke B. The Tavistock’s 1945 invention of organization development: Early British business and management applications of social psychiatry. Business History 2013; 55(5): 768–89.

29. Fraher AL. Systems psychodynamics: The formative years of an interdisciplinary field at the Tavistock Institute. History of Psychology 2004; 7(1): 65–84.

30. Highhouse. A history of the T-group.

31. Snyder M. In the footsteps of Kurt Lewin: Practical theorizing, action research, and the psychology of social action. Journal of Social Issues 2009; 65(1): 225–45.

32. Boog BWM. The emancipatory character of action research, its history and the present state of the art. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 2003; 13(6): 426–38.

33. Burnes B. Reflections: Ethics and organizational change—time for a return to Lewinian values. Journal of Change Management 2009; 9(4): 359–81.

34. Novotna T. Hastily arranged marriage: political attitudes and perceptions in Germany twenty years after unification. German Politics and Society 2010; 28(4)): 19–40; Silver H. The social integration of Germany since unification. German Politics and Society 2010; 28(1)): 165–88; Hogwood P. ‘How happy are you …?’ Subjective well-being in east Germany twenty years after unification. Politics 2011; 31(3): 148–58; Behrend H. Viewpoints on German partition and reunification. Social Semiotics 2011; 21(1): 55–65.

35. Zimmerman DK. Participative management: a reexamination of the classics. Academy of Management Review 1978; 3(4): 896–901.

36. Kopelman RE, Prottas DJ, Falk DW. Further development of a measure of theory x and y managerial assumptions. Journal of Managerial Issues 2012; 24(4): 450–70; McGregor D, Nord WR, Jacobs D. The human side of enterprise. Academy of Management Review 2004; 29(2): 293–6.

37. Blake RR, Mouton JS. Management by grid® principles or situationalism: Which? Group and Organization Management 1981; 6(4): 439–55.

38. Chemers MM. Leadership research and theory: A functional integration. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2000; 4(1): 27–43.

39. Baumrind D. Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology 1971; 4(1, Pt.2): 1–103; Darling N, Steinberg L. Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin 1993; 113(3): 487–96.

40. Likert R. From production- and employee-centeredness to systems 1–4. Journal of Management 2016; 5(2): 147–56.

1. Olson MS, Bever DV. Stall points: Most companies stop growing—yours doesn’t have to. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008;

2. Olson and Bever, Stall Points; Pettigrew AM. The awakening giant: Continuity and change in Imperial Chemical Industries. London: Routledge, 2013.

3. Ribeiro Serra F, Portugal Ferreira M, Isnard Ribeiro de Almeida M. Organizational decline: A yet largely neglected topic in organizational studies. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management 2013; 11(2): 133–56.

4. Van de Ven, AH, Poole MS. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review 1995; 20(3): 510–40; Chandler AD, Jr. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Philadelphia: Beard Books, 1962.

5. Hambrick DC, D’Aveni RA. Large corporate failures as downward spirals. Administrative Science Quarterly 1988; 33(1): 1–23.

6. Gill RB, Mayewski PA, Nyberg J, Haug GH, Peterson LC. Drought and the maya collapse. Ancient Mesoamerica 2007; 18(2): 283–302.

7. Foster-Fishman PG, Nowell B, Yang H. Putting the system back into systems change: A framework for understanding and changing organizational and community systems. American Journal of Community Psychology 2007; 39(3–4): 197–215.

8. Enzmann DR, Feinberg DT. The nature of change. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2014; 11(5): 464–70.

9. Gladwell M. The tipping point. New York: Little, Brown, 2004.

10. Boin A, Kofman C, Kuilman J, Kuipers S, van Witteloostuijn A. Does organizational adaptation really matter? How mission change affects the survival of U.S. federal independent agencies, 1933–2011. Governance 2017; 30(4): 663–86.

11. Deegan T, Reeves M, Whitaker K. Fighting the gravity of average performance. MIT Sloan Management Review eBook; 2020.

12. Trahms CA, Ndofor HA, Sirmon DG. Organizational decline and turnaround: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management 2013; 39(5): 1277–307.

13. Nutt PC. Organizational de‐development. Journal of Management Studies 2004; 41(7): 1083–103.

14. Bedeian AG, Armenakis AA. The cesspool syndrome: How dreck floats to the top of declining organizations. Academy of Management Executive 1998; 12(1): 58–67.

15. Brockner J, Grover S, O’Malley MN, Reed TF, Glynn MA. Threat of future layoffs, self-esteem, and survivors’ reactions: Evidence from the laboratory and the field. Strategic Management Journal 1993; 14(S1): 153–66; Brockner J, Grover S, Reed T, DeWitt R, O’Malley M. Survivors’ reactions to layoffs: We get by with a little help for our friends. Administrative Science Quarterly 1987; 32(4): 526–41.

16. Tainter JA. The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1988.

17. Raeff C. Distinguishing between development and change: Reviving organismic-developmental theory. Human Development 2011; 54(1): 4–33.

18. Taleb N. Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. New York: Random House, 2012.

19. Sternberg RJ. A theory of adaptive intelligence and its relation to general intelligence. Journal of Intelligence 2019; 7(4): 23–39.

20. Akgün AE, Lynn GS, Byrne JC. Organizational learning: A socio-cognitive framework. Human Relations 2016; 56(7): 839–68.

21. Albrecht K. Power of minds at work: Organizational intelligence in action. New York: AMACOM, 2003.

22. Alvesson M, Spicer A. A stupidity-based theory of organizations. Journal of Management Studies 2012; 49(7): 1194–220.

23. Beer M, Nohria N. Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review 2000; 78(3): 133–41; Burnes B. Introduction: Why does change fail, and what can we do about it? Journal of Change Management 2011; 11(4): 445–50.

24. McDonald C. Western Union’s failed reinvention: The role of momentum in resisting strategic change, 1965–1993. Business History Review 2012; 86(3): 527–49.

25. Mellert LD, Scherbaum C, Oliveira J, Wilke B. Examining the relationship between organizational change and financial loss. Journal of Organizational Change Management 2015; 28(1): 59–71.

26. Erwin DG, Garman AN. Resistance to organizational change: Linking research and practice. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 2010; 31(1): 39–56.

27. Ford JD, Ford LW, D’Amelio A. Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Academy of Management Review 2008; 33(2): 362–77.

28. Armenakis AA, Harris SG, Mossholder KW. Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations 2016; 46(6): 681–703.

29. Rusly FH, Sun PY-T, Corner JL. Change readiness: Creating understanding and capability for the knowledge acquisition process. Journal of Knowledge Management 2015; 19(6): 1204–23.

30. Stevens GW. Toward a process-based approach of conceptualizing change readiness. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2013; 49(3): 333–60.

31. Steinmetz H, Knappstein M, Ajzen I, Schmidt P, Kabst R. How effective are behavior change interventions based on the theory of planned behavior? A three-level meta-analysis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 2016; 224(3): 216–33; Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Attitudes, norms, and control as predictors of intentions and behavior. In Fishbein M, Ajzen I. (Eds.) Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press, 2010: 44–88.

32. Trosten-Bloom A, Whitney DD, Cooperrider D. The power of appreciative inquiry: A practical guide to positive change. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler, 2010.

33. Raelin JA. The manager as facilitator of dialogue. Organization 2013; 20(6): 818–39 Gunnlaugson O. Generative dialogue as a transformative learning practice in adult and higher education settings. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education 2006; 12(1): 2–19.

34. Newcomb TM, Turner RH, Converse PE. Social psychology: The study of human interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1965.

35. Costanza DP, Blacksmith N, Coats MR, Severt JB, DeCostanza AH. The effect of adaptive organizational culture on long-term survival. Journal of Business and Psychology 2016; 31(3): 361–81; Schwaninger M. Intelligent organizations: An integrative framework. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2001; 18(2): 137–58.

36. Gully SM, Incalcaterra KA, Joshi A, Beaubien JM. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology 2002; 87(5): 819–32.

37. Wigfield A, Eccles JS. Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2000; 25(1): 68–81.

38. Chung GH, Choi JN, Du J. Tired of innovations? Learned helplessness and fatigue in the context of continuous streams of innovation implementation. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2017; 38(7): 1130–48.

39. Probst G, Raisch S. Organizational crisis: The logic of failure. Academy of Management Executive 2005; 19(1): 90–105.

40. Deming WE. Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000; Ford JK, Lauricella TK, Van Fossen JA, Riley SJ. Creating energy for change: The role of changes in perceived leadership support on commitment to an organizational change initiative. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2021 Jun;57(2):153–73.

41. Burnes B. Understanding resistance to change—Building on Coch and French. Journal of Change Management 2015; 15(2): 92–116.

42. Parry W, Kirsch C, Carey P, Shaw D. Empirical development of a model of performance drivers in organizational change projects. Journal of Change Management 2014; 14(1): 99–125.

43. Burnes B, Cooke B. Kurt Lewin’s field theory: A review and re-evaluation. International Journal of Management Reviews 2013; 15(4): 408–25.

44. Dawkins R. Universal Darwinism. In Bedau MA, Cleland CE. (Eds.) The nature of life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010: 360–373.

45. Teece DJ. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 2007; 28(13): 1319–50.

46. Al-Haddad S, Kotnour T. Integrating the organizational change literature: A model for successful change. Journal of Organizational Change Management 2015; 28(2): 234–62.

47. Rudolph JW, Repenning NP. Disaster dynamics: Understanding the role of quantity in organizational collapse. Administrative Science Quarterly 2002; 47(1): 1–30; Perrow C. Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.

48. Kuhn TS, Hacking I. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962; Klammer A, Grisold T, Gueldenberg S. Introducing a “stop-doing” culture: How to free your organization from rigidity. Business Horizons 2019; 62(4): 451–8.

49. Don’t get Netflixed: Your current business model isn’t going to last much longer. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2012.

50. Snihur Y. Responding to business model innovation: Organizational unlearning and firm failure. Learning Organization 2018; 25(3): 190–8.

51. Wason PC. On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1960; 12(3): 129–40; Johnson-Laird PN, Legrenzi P, Legrenzi MS. Reasoning and a sense of reality. The British Journal of Psychology 1972; 63(3): 395–400.

52. Scott P. Rethinking business models in the Great Depression: The failure of America’s vacuum cleaner industry. Business History Review 2019; 93(2): 319–48; Christensen CM, Bartman T, Van Bever D. The hard truth about business model innovation. Sloan Management Review 2016; 58(1): 31–40.

53. Schreyögg G, Sydow J. Organizational path dependence: A process view. Organization Studies 2011; 32(3): 321–35.

54. Zhao L, Yang G, Wang W, et al. Herd behavior in a complex adaptive system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2011; 108(37): 15058–63.

55. Janis IL. Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1983.

56. Rook L. An Economic Psychological approach to herd behavior. Journal of Economic Issues 2016; 40(1): 75–95.

57. Chen Y-F. Herd behavior in purchasing books online. Computers in Human Behavior 2008; 24(5): 1977–92.

58. Asch SE. Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American 1955; 193(5): 31–35; Asch SE. Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs 1956; 70(9): 1–70.

59. Kundu P, Cummins DD. Morality and conformity: The Asch paradigm applied to moral decisions. Social Influence 2013; 8(4): 268–79.

60. Griskevicius V, Goldstein NJ, Mortensen CR, Cialdini RB, Kenrick DT. Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006; 91(2): 281–94.

61. Manning K. How many saints are there? The Guardian. May 13, 2013.

62. Lorenz KZ. The evolution of behavior. Scientific American 1958; 199(6): 67–82.

63. Stinchcombe AL, Baum JAC, Dobbin F. (Ed.) Economics meets sociology in strategic management. Vol. 17, Advances in strategic management. Stamford, CT: JAI Press, 2000; Simsek Z, Fox BC, Heavey C. What’s past is prologue: A framework, review, and future directions for organizational research on imprinting. Journal of Management 2015; 41(1): 288–317.

64. Johnson V. What is organizational imprinting? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris Opera. American Journal of Sociology 2007; 113(1): 97–127.

65. Baumol WJ, Bowen WG. On the performing arts: The anatomy of their economic problems. American Economic Review 1965; 55(1/2): 495–502.

66. Schwarz GM, Yang K-P, Chou C, Chiu Y-J. A classification of structural inertia: Variations in structural response. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 2018; 37(1): 1–31; Hannan MT, Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 1984; 49(2): 149–64.

67. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979; 47(2): 263–92.

68. Miller D. The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management Review 1993; 18(1): 116–38; Miller D. What happens after success: The perils of excellence. Journal of Management Studies 1994; 31(3): 325–58.

69. Staw BM. Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1976; 16(1): 27–44.

70. Brockner J. The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review 1992; 17(1): 39–61.

71. Lofquist EA, Lines R. Keeping promises: A process study of escalating commitment leading to organizational change collapse. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2017; 53(4): 417–45.

72. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1991; 5(1): 193–206; Inzlicht M, Shenhav A, Olivola CY. The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2018; 22(4): 337–49.

73. Brewer N, Wells GL. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied 2006; 12(1): 11–30.

74. Moore DA, Healy PJ. The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review 2008; 115(2): 502–17.

75. Greenberg S, Stephens-Davidowitz S. You underestimate yourself. Opinion. New York Times. April 6, 2019.

76. Van Zant AB, Moore DA. Avoiding the pitfalls of overconfidence while benefiting from the advantages of confidence. California Management Review 2013; 55(2): 5–23.

77. Johnson DDP, Fowler JH. The evolution of overconfidence. Nature 2011; 477(7364): 317–20.

78. Jones N. The underdog might win the day. NewScientist. August 2, 2002.

79. Charness G, Rustichini A, van de Ven J. Self-confidence and strategic deterrence. Tinbergen Institute, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers: 11-151/1; 2011.

80. Beer M, Eisenstat RA. The silent killers of strategy implementation and learning. Sloan Management Review 2000; 41(4): 29–40.

81. Glor ED. Assessing organizational capacity to adapt. Emergence 2007; 9(3): 33–46.

82. Gassmann O, Enkel E, Chesbrough H. The future of open innovation. R&D Management 2010; 40(3): 213–21; Johnson MW, Christensen CM, Kagermann H. Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review. December 2008.

83. Huang H-C, Lai M-C, Lin L-H, Chen C-T. Overcoming organizational inertia to strengthen business model innovation: An open innovation perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management 2013; 26(6): 977–1002.

84. Agarwal N, Grottke M, Mishra S, Brem A. A systematic literature review of constraint-based innovations: State of the art and future perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2017; 64(1): 3–15.

85. Leliveld A, Knorringa P. Frugal innovation and development research. European Journal of Development Research 2017; 30(1): 1–16.

86. Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1966). The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

87. Witell L, Gebauer H, Jaakkola E, Hammedi W, Patricio L, Perks H. A bricolage perspective on service innovation. Journal of Business Research 2017; 79: 290–8; Engelen E, Erturk I, Froud J, Leaver A, Williams K. Reconceptualizing financial innovation: Frame, conjuncture and bricolage. Economy and Society 2010; 39(1): 33–63.

88. Peirson LJ, Boydell KM, Ferguson HB, Ferris LE. An ecological process model of systems change. American Journal of Community Psychology 2011; 47(3): 307–21.

89. Buchanan D, Claydon T, Doyle M. Organisation development and change: The legacy of the nineties. Human Resource Management Journal 1999; 9(2): 20–37.

90. Buchanan D, Fitzgerald L, Ketley D, et al. No going back: A review of the literature on sustaining organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews 2005; 7(3): 189–205.

91. Felin T, Powell TC. Designing organizations for dynamic capabilities. California Management Review 2016; 58(4): 78–96.

92. Murray A, Skene K, Haynes K. The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics 2015; 140(3): 369–80.

93. Daou A, Mallat C, Chammas G, Cerantola N, Kayed S, Saliba NA. The ecocanvas as a business model canvas for a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020; 258: 120938.

94. Sovacool BK, Ali SH, Bazilian M, et al. Sustainable minerals and metals for a low-carbon future. Science 2020; 367(6473): 30–3; Lee J, Bazilian M, Sovacool B, Greene S. Responsible or reckless? A critical review of the environmental and climate assessments of mineral supply chains. Environmental Research Letters 2020; 15(10): 103009.

95. Stalinski S. Organizational intelligence: A systems perspective. Organization Development Journal 2004; 22(2): 55.

1. Daepp MIG, Hamilton MJ, West GB, Bettencourt LMA. The mortality of companies. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2015; 12(106): 20150120.

2. Graham JR, Harvey CR, Rajgopal S. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting & Economics 2005; 40(1): 3–73.

3. Napolitano MR, Marino V, Ojala J. In search of an integrated framework of business longevity. Business History 2015; 57(7): 955–69.

4. Barton D, Manyika J, Koller T, Palter R, Godsall J, Zoffer J. Measuring the economic impact of short-termism. McKinsey Quarterly. February 2017; 1–16.

5. Bereskin FL, Hsu PH, Rotenberg W. The real effects of real earnings management: Evidence from innovation. Contemporary Accounting Research 2018; 35(1): 525–57.

6. Junni P, Sarala RM, Taras V, Tarba SY. Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives 2013; 27(4): 299–312.

7. Barton D, Wiseman M. Perspectives on the long term. McKinsey Quarterly. March 1, 2015; 98–107.

8. Rahmandad H, Henderson R, Repenning NP. Making the numbers? “Short termism” and the puzzle of only occasional disaster. Management Science 2018; 64(3): 1328–47.

9. Karlgaard R. Ahead of their time: Noble flops. Forbes. April 14, 2013; 1.

10. Hadhazy A. Ahead of its time, gutsy biofuel firm goes bust. Discover Magazine. May 15, 2014.

11. Teece D, Peteraf M, Leih S. Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review 2016; 58(4): 13–35; Czisnik M. Admiral Nelson’s tactics at the Battle of Trafalgar. History 2004; 89(296): 549–59; Welsh WE. Nelson at Trafalgar: He did his duty. Military History 2005; 22(7): 38–72.

12. Moore GA. To succeed in the long term, focus on the middle term. Harvard Business Review 2007; 85(7/8): 84–90.

13. Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA. The ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 1996; 38(4): 8–30.

14. Danneels E. Trying to become a different type of company: Dynamic capability at Smith Corona. Strategic Management Journal 2011; 32(1): 1–31; Frieswick K. The turning point. CFO.com. April 1, 2005.

15. Denrell J, March JG. Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organization Science 2001; 12(5): 523–38; March JG. Continuity and change in theories of organizational action. Administrative Science Quarterly 1996; 41(2): 278–87.

16. Denrell J, Le Mens G. Revisiting the competency trap. Industrial and Corporate Change 2020; 29(1): 183–205.

17. Arkes HR, Blumer C. The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1985; 35(1): 124–40.

18. Thaler RH. Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1999; 12(3): 183–206; Thaler RH. From cashews to nudges: The evolution of behavioral economics. American Economic Review 2018; 108(6): 1265–87.

19. Thaler. Mental accounting matters.

20. Harvey JB. The Abilene paradox: The management of agreement. Organizational Dynamics 1974; 3(1): 63–80.

21. Goode E. The “sunk cost fallacy” claims more victims. New York Times. July 17, 2018; Sect. D6.

22. Sweis BM, Abram SV, Schmidt BJ, et al. Sensitivity to “sunk costs” in mice, rats, and humans. Science 2018; 361(6398): 178–81.

23. Arkes HR, Ayton P. The sunk cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals? Psychological Bulletin 1999; 125(5): 591–600.

24. Eswaran M, Neary HM. the evolutionary logic of honoring sunk costs. Economic Inquiry 2016; 54(2): 835–46; Nozick R. The nature of rationality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.

25. Fox S, Bizman A, Huberman O. Escalation of Commitment: The effect of number and attractiveness of available investment alternatives. Journal of Business and Psychology 2009; 24(4): 431–9.

26. Anderson CJ. The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin 2003; 129(1): 139–67.

27. Magen E, Gross JJ. Harnessing the need for immediate gratification: Cognitive reconstrual modulates the reward value of temptations. Emotion 2007; 7(2): 415–28.

28. McKerchar TL, Renda CR. Delay and probability discounting in humans: An overview. Psychological Record 2012; 62(4): 817–34.

29. MacGregor KE, Carnevale JJ, Dusthimer NE, Fujita K. Knowledge of the self-control benefits of high-level versus low-level construal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2017; 112(4): 607–20.

30. Baum JR, Locke EA, Kirkpatrick SA. A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Applied Psychology 1998; 83(1): 43–54.

31. Lemmon K, Moore C. The development of prudence in the face of varying future rewards. Developmental Science 2007; 10(4): 502–11.

32. Read D, Frederick S, Orsel B, Rahman J. Four score and seven years from now: The date/delay effect in temporal discounting. Management Science 2005; 51(9): 1326–35.

33. Amir O, Ariely D. Resting on laurels: the effects of discrete progress markers as subgoals on task performance and preferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008; 34(5): 1158–71.

34. Mischel W. The marshmallow test: Mastering self-control. New York: Little, Brown, 2014; Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez M. Delay of gratification in children. Science 1989; 244(4907): 933–8.

35. Souder D, Shaver JM. Constraints and incentives for making long horizon corporate investments. Strategic Management Journal 2010; 31(12): 1316–36.

36. Frieswick K. The turning point: What options do companies have when their industries are dying? CFO. April 1, 2005.

37. Schwenke D, Dshemuchadse M, Vesper C, Bleichner MG, Scherbaum S. Let’s decide together: Differences between individual and joint delay discounting. PLoS One 2017; 12(4): e0176003.

38. Kleymann B, Malloch H. The rule of Saint Benedict and corporate management: employing the whole person. Journal of Global Responsibility 2010; 1(2): 207–24.

39. Brettel M, Greve GI, Flatten TC. Giving up linearity: Absorptive capacity and performance. Journal of Managerial Issues 2011; 23(2): 164–89; Daspit JJ, D’Souza DE. Understanding the multi-dimensional nature of absorptive capacity. Journal of Managerial Issues 2013; 25(3): 299–316; Kranz JJ, Hanelt A, Kolbe LM. Understanding the influence of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity on the process of business model change: The case of on‐premise and cloud‐computing software. Information Systems Journal 2016; 26(5): 477–517.

40. McGovern T. Why do successful companies fail? A case study of the decline of Dunlop. Business History 2007; 49(6): 886–907.

41. Josephson BW, Johnson JL, Mariadoss BJ. Strategic marketing ambidexterity: Antecedents and financial consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2016; 44(4): 539–54.

42. Osvath M. Putting flexible animal prospection into context: Escaping the theoretical box. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science 2016; 7(1): 5–18; Wilkins C, Clayton N. Reflections on the spoon test. Neuropsychologia 2019; 134: 107221.

43. Turner N, Swart J, Maylor H. Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 2013; 15(3): 317–32.

44. Cantarello S, Martini A, Nosella A. A multi-level model for organizational ambidexterity in the search phase of the innovation process: Organizational ambidexterity. Creativity and Innovation Management 2012; 21(1): 28–48.

45. Taylor A. Sixty to zero: An inside look at the collapse of General Motors—and the Detroit auto industry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010.

46. Markides CC. Business model innovation: What can the ambidexterity literature teach us? Academy of Management Perspectives 2013; 27(4): 313–23.

47. Beer M, Walton E. Developing the competitive organization: Interventions and strategies. American Psychologist 1990; 45(2): 154–61.

48. Stoll JD. Corporate America’s most underrated innovation strategy: 3M’s 15% rule. Wall Street Journal. May 15, 2020.

49. Gunther M, Adamo M, Feldman B. 3M’s innovation revival. CNN Money. September 24, 2010.

50. Madden BJ. The purpose of the firm, valuation, and the management of intangibles. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 2017; 29(2): 76–86.

51. Rahrovani Y, Pinsonneault A, Austin RD. If you cut employees some slack, will they innovate? MIT Sloan Management Review 2018; 59(4): 47–51.

1. Dawes RM. Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology 1980; 31(1): 169–93; Komorita SS, Parks CD. Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology 1995; 46(1): 183–207; Van Lange PAM, Joireman J, Parks CD, Van Dijk E. The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2013; 120(2): 125–41.

2. Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 1968; 162(3859): 1243–8.

3. Milinski M, Sommerfeld RD, Krambeck H-J, Reed FA, Marotzke J. The collective-risk social dilemma and the prevention of simulated dangerous climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008; 105(7): 2291–4.

4. Attari SZ, Krantz DH, Weber EU. Reasons for cooperation and defection in real-world social dilemmas. Judgment and Decision Making 2014; 9(4): 316–34.

5. Rand DG, Greene JD, Nowak MA. Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature 2012; 489(7416): 427–30; Tenbrunsel AE, Messick DM. Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly 1999; 44(4): 684–707.

6. Greenbaum RL, Bonner JM, Mawritz MB, Butts MM, Smith MB. It is all about the bottom line: Group bottom‐line mentality, psychological safety, and group creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2020; 41(6): 503–17.

7. Kollock P. Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology 1998; 24(1): 183–214.

8. Moisan F, ten Brincke R, Murphy RO, Gonzalez C. Not all prisoner’s dilemma games are equal: Incentives, social preferences, and cooperation. Decision 2018; 5(4): 306–22.

9. Efferson C, Roca CP, Vogt S, Helbing D. Sustained cooperation by running away from bad behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior 2016; 37(1): 1–9.

10. Milinski M. Reputation, a universal currency for human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions Biological Sciences 2016; 371(1687): 20150100; Nowak MA, Sigmund K. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 1998; 393(6685): 573–7.

11. Heider F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. Hove, England: Psychology Press, 1958; Gross J, De Dreu CKW. The rise and fall of cooperation through reputation and group polarization. Nature communications 2019; 10(1): 776–10.

12. Balliet D, Van Lange PAM. Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2013; 139(5): 1090–112; Holmes JG. Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective. Personal Relationships 2002; 9(1): 1–26.

13. Balliet, Van Lange. Trust, conflict, and cooperation.

14. Putnam RD. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 1995; 6(1): 65–78.

15. Kramer RM. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology 1999; 50(1): 569–98.

16. Klapwijk A, Van Lange PAM. Promoting cooperation and trust in “noisy” situations: The power of generosity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009; 96(1): 83–103; Reinders Folmer CP, Wildschut T, De Cremer D, van Lange PAM. Coping with noise in social dilemmas: Group representatives fare worse than individuals because they lack trust in others’ benign intentions. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 2019; 22(2): 200–14.

17. O’Malley MN, Schubarth G. Fairness and appeasement: Achievement and affiliation motives in interpersonal relations. Social Psychology Quarterly 1984; 47(4): 364–71.

18. Lange F, Eggert F. Selective cooperation in the supermarket. Human Nature 2015; 26(4): 392–400.

19. Zaki J, Mitchell JP. Intuitive prosociality. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2013; 22(6): 466–70.

20. Rand DG, Nowak MA. Human cooperation. Trends in cognitive sciences 2013; 17(8): 413–25; Chiong R, Kirley M. Promotion of cooperation in social dilemma games via generalised indirect reciprocity. Connection Science 2015; 27(4): 417–33; Simpson B, Harrell A, Melamed D, Heiserman N, Negraia DV. The roots of reciprocity: Gratitude and reputation in generalized exchange systems. American Sociological Review 2018; 83(1): 88–110.

21. Horita Y, Takezawa M, Kinjo T, Nakawake Y, Masuda N. Transient nature of cooperation by pay-it-forward reciprocity. Scientific Reports 2016; 6(1): 19471.

22. Chancellor J, Margolis S, Bao KJ, Lyubomirsky S. Everyday prosociality in the workplace: The reinforcing benefits of giving, getting, and glimpsing. Emotion 2018; 18(4): 507–17.

23. Paternotte C. The epistemic core of weak joint action. Philosophical Psychology 2015; 28(1): 70–93.

24. Ostrom E. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015; Parsons T. The structure of social action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1937.

25. Kelley HH, Thibaut JW. Interpersonal relations. A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley, 1978.

26. Brodbeck FC, Kugler KG, Reif JAM, Maier MA. Morals matter in economic games. PLoS One 2013; 8(12): e81558.

27. Irwin K, Mulder L, Simpson B. The detrimental effects of sanctions on intragroup trust: Comparing punishments and rewards. Social Psychology Quarterly 2014; 77(3): 253–72.

28. Bailey C, Shantz A. Creating an ethically strong organization. MIT Sloan Management Review 2018; 60(1): 1–10.

29. Denant-Boemont L, Masclet D, Noussair CN. Punishment, counterpunishment and sanction enforcement in a social dilemma experiment. Economic Theory 2007; 33(1): 145–67.

30. Irwin, Mulder, Simpson. The detrimental effects of sanctions on intragroup trust.

31. Festinger L, Carlsmith JM. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1959; 58(2): 203–10.

32. Aronson E, Carlsmith JM. Effect of the severity of threat on the devaluation of forbidden behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963; 66(6): 584–8.

33. Simpson B, Willer R, Harrell A. The enforcement of moral boundaries promotes cooperation and prosocial behavior in groups. Scientific Reports 2017; 7(1): 42844; Fehr E, Gächter S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 2002; 415(6868): 137–40.

34. Ellingsen T, Johannesson M. Anticipated verbal feedback induces altruistic behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior 2008; 29(2): 100–5.

35. Pruitt DG, Kimmel MJ. Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology 1977; 28(1): 363–92; Columbus S, Münich J, Gerpott FH. Playing a different game: Situation perception mediates framing effects on cooperative behaviour. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2020; 90: 104006.

36. Goette L, Huffman D, Meier S. The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: Evidence using random assignment to real social groups. The American Economic Review 2006; 96(2): 212–6; Ames K, Majolo B, Hall K, Wilson N, Brumpton R, Garratt R. Human friendship favours cooperation in the iterated prisoner's dilemma. Behaviour 2006; 143(11): 1383–95.

37. Chierchia G, Coricelli G. The impact of perceived similarity on tacit coordination: Propensity for matching and aversion to decoupling choices. Frontiers In Behavioral Neuroscience 2015; 9(JULY): 202.

38. Van Vugt M, Hogan R, Kaiser RB. Leadership, Followership, and Evolution: Some lessons from the past. The American Psychologist 2008; 63(3): 182–96.

39. Rossano MJ. The essential role of ritual in the transmission and reinforcement of social norms. Psychological Bulletin 2012; 138(3): 529–49; Briody EK, Berger EJ, Wirtz E, Ramos A, Guruprasad G, Morrison EF. Ritual as work strategy: A window into organizational culture. Human Organization 2018; 77(3): 189–201.

40. Durkheim, É. The elementary forms of the religious life. A study in religious sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

41. MacCormick N. Norms, institutions, and institutional facts. Law and Philosophy 1998; 17(3): 301–45; Schmitt BH, Dubé L, Leclerc F. Intrusions into waiting lines: Does the queue constitute a social system? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992; 63(5): 806–15.

42. Thoits PA, Hewitt LN. Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 2001; 42(2): 115–31; Weinstein N, Ryan RM. When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2010; 98(2): 222–44.

43. Sherif CW, Harvey OJ, Sherif M, Hood WR, White J. Robbers cave experiment: Intergroup conflict and cooperation. Middleton, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2010; Perry G. Real-life lord of the flies. Guardian. April 16, 2018.

44. Deutsch M. Constructive conflict resolution: Principles, training, and research. Journal of Social Issues 1994; 50(1): 13–32.

45. Campbell DT. Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2007; 3(1): 14–25.

46. Bass B. The inspirational processes of leadership. Journal of Management Development 1988; 7(5): 21–31.

47. Bartleby. Mission implausible. Economist August 4, 2018; 414(9100).

48. Rafferty AE, Griffin MA. Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. Leadership Quarterly 2004; 15(3): 329–54.

49. Heath C, Heath D. Made to stick. New York: Random House 2007.

50. Benkler Y. The unselfish gene. Harvard Business Review. August 2011.

51. Grueneisen S, Tomasello M. Children use rules to coordinate in a social dilemma. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2019; 179: 362–74; Simpson B, Willer R. Beyond altruism: Sociological foundations of cooperation and prosocial behavior. Annual Review of Sociology 2015; 41(1): 43–63.

52. Schein EH, Schein P. Organizational culture and leadership, 5th ed. New York: Wiley, 2017.

53. North D, Field AJ. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

54. Curry O, Dunbar RIM. Do birds of a feather flock together?: The relationship between similarity and altruism in social networks. Human Nature 2013; 24(3): 336–47.

55. Tajfel H. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology 1982; 33(1): 1–39; Turner JC, Oakes PJ. Self-categorization theory and social influence. In Paulus PB. (Ed.) Psychology of group influence. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum,1989: 233–75; Hogg MA, Terry DJ, White KM. A Tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 1995; 58(4): 255–69.

56. Bavel JJV, Baicker K, Boggio PS, et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour 2020; 4(5): 460–71.

57. Balliet D, Wu J, De Dreu CKW. Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2014; 140(6): 1556–81.

58. Dunham Y. Mere membership. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2018; 22(9): 780–93.

59. Lee E-S, Park T-Y, Koo B. Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 2015; 141(5): 1049–80.

60. Callahan SP, Ledgerwood A. On the psychological function of flags and logos: Group identity symbols increase perceived entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2016; 110(4): 528–50; Keblusek L, Giles H, Maass A. Communication and group life: How language and symbols shape intergroup relations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 2017; 20(5): 632–43.

61. Wiltermuth SS, Heath C. Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science 2009; 20(1): 1–5.

62. Garrett HJ. The kernel of human (or rodent) kindness. Opinion. New York Times. December 28, 2018.

63. Shellenbarger S. Why perks no longer cut it for workers.. Journal Reports: Leadership. Wall Street Journal. December 3, 2018.

64. Ansberry C. What to do about that awful parent at the game. Life & Arts: Turning Points. Wall Street Journal. June 3, 2019.

65. Worrell FC, Knotek SE, Plucker JA, et al. Competition’s role in developing psychological strength and outstanding performance. Review of General Psychology 2016; 20(3): 259–71.

66. Tsai W. Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science 2002; 13(2): 179–90.

67. Evans RB, Prado MP, Zambrana R. Competition and cooperation in mutual fund families. Journal of Financial Economics 2020; 136(1): 168–88.

68. Roux C, Goldsmith K, Bonezzi A. On the psychology of scarcity: When reminders of resource scarcity promote selfish (and generous) behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 2015; 42(4): 615–31.

69. Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD, Gallo E, Reade JJ. Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal 2016; 59(5): 1508–34.

1. Feldman MS, Pentland BT. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly 2003; 48(1): 94–118; Pentland BT, Feldman MS. Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change 2005; 14(5): 793–815.

2. Gebauer J, Schober F. Information system flexibility and the cost efficiency of business processes. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 2006; 7(3): 122–46.

3. Au S-Y, Dong M, Tremblay A. Employee flexibility, exogenous risk, and firm value. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 2021 May;56(3):853-84.

4. Burns T, Stalker GM. Mechanistic and organic systems. In Cameron KS. (Ed.) Organizational effectiveness: The international library of critical writings on business and management. Northampton, MA: Elgar, 2010: 3–8.

5. Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 1967; 12(1): 1–47; Hage J. An axiomatic theory of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 1965; 10(3): 289–320.

6. Kessler SR, Nixon AE, Nord WR. Examining organic and mechanistic structures: Do we know as much as we thought? International Journal of Management Reviews 2017; 19(4): 531–55; Sherehiy B, Karwowski W, Layer JK. A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2007; 37(5): 445–60; Brown A. Organisational paradigms and sustainability in excellence. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 2014; 6(2/3): 181–90; Burns T, Stalker GM. The management of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press (rev. ed.), 1994.

7. Huang X, Kristal MM, Schroeder RG. The impact of organizational structure on mass customization capability: A contingency view. Production and Operations Management 2010; 19(5): 515–30.

8. Wright PM, Snell SA. Toward a unifying framework for exploring fit and flexibility in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review 1998; 23(4): 756–72.

9. Jain A, Jain PK, Chan FTS, Singh S. A review on manufacturing flexibility. International Journal of Production Research 2013; 51(19): 5946–70; Mendes L, Machado J. Employees’ skills, manufacturing flexibility and performance: a structural equation modelling applied to the automotive industry. International Journal of Production Research 2015; 53(13): 4087–101.

10. Westrum R. A typology of organisational cultures. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2004; 13(2): ii22–ii7.

11. Roberts KH, Bea R. Must accidents happen? Lessons from high-reliability organizations. Academy of Management Executive 2001; 15(3): 70–8; Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM. Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organization Science 2006; 17(4): 514–24.

12. Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. In Starbuck WH, Whalen PS. (Eds.) Organizational learning and knowledge management. Vol. 2, Learning by organizations. Northampton, MA: Elgar, 2008: 106–29.

13. Bamel UK, Bamel N. Organizational resources, KM process capability and strategic flexibility: A dynamic resource-capability perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management 2018; 22(7): 1555–72.

14. Yan Z, Gao SY, Teo CP. On the design of sparse but efficient structures in operations. Management Science 2018; 64(7): 3421–45.

15. Roberts G. Honda introduces “flowing cell” production system in Thailand. JustAuto. April 21, 2016.

16. Duncker K. On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, No. 270. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1945; Georgsdottir AS, Getz I. How flexibility facilitates innovation and ways to manage it in organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management 2004; 13(3): 166–75.

17. Mason S, Mountain G, Turner J, et al. Innovations to reduce demand and crowding in emergency care; a review study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2014; 22: 55–61.

18. Nagarajan M, Shechter S. Prospect theory and the newsvendor problem. Management Science 2014; 60(4): 1057–62; Long X, Nasiry J. Prospect theory explains newsvendor behavior: The role of reference points. Management Science 2015; 61(12): 3009–12; Vipin B, Amit RK. Describing decision bias in the newsvendor problem: A prospect theory model. Omega 2019; 82: 132–41.

19. Ashby WR. An introduction to cybernetics. Oxford: Wiley, 1956.

20. Kashefi M. Work flexibility and its individual consequences. Canadian Journal of Sociology 2007; 32(3): 341–69; Oke A, Idiagbon-Oke M. Implementing flexible labour strategies: Challenges and key success factors. Journal of Change Management 2007; 7(1): 69–87.

21. Sullivan TA. Greedy institutions, overwork, and work‐life balance. Sociological Inquiry 2014; 84(1): 1–15; Beckers DGJ, van der Linden D, Smulders PGW, et al. Voluntary or involuntary? Control over overtime and rewards for overtime in relation to fatigue and work satisfaction. Work and Stress 2008; 22(1): 33–50; Board TE. Working less can save lives. New York Times. May 30, 2021.

22. Rabenu E, Aharoni-Goldenberg S. Understanding the relationship between overtime and burnout. International Studies of Management and Organization 2017; 47(4): 324–35.

23. Wheatley C. Nursing overtime: Should it be regulated? Nursing Economics 2017; 35(4): 213–7.

24. Nicol A-M, Botterill JS. On-call work and health: A review. Environmental Health 2004; 3: 15–7; Ziebertz C, van Hooff MLM, Beckers DGJ, et al. The relationship of on-call work with fatigue, work-home interference, and perceived performance difficulties. BioMed Research International 2015; 2015: 1–10.

25. Carson ED. Disney, Zumiez among 6 retailers ending “on call” work schedules. Investor's Business Daily. December 20, 2016.

26. Henly JR, Lambert SJ. Unpredictable work timing in retail jobs: Implications for employee work-life conflict. ILR Review 2014; 67(3): 986–1016.

27. Kamalahmadi M, Yu Q, Zhou Y-P. Call to duty: Just-in-time scheduling in a restaurant chain. Management Science. In press.

28. Dunn M. Who chooses part-time work and why? Monthly Labor Review. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2018: 1–25.

29. Künn-Nelen A, De Grip A, Fouarge D. Is part-time employment beneficial for firm productivity? ILR Review 2013; 66(5): 1172–91; Kesavan S, Staats BR, Gilland W. Volume flexibility in services: The costs and benefits of flexible labor resources. Management Science 2014; 60(8): 1884–906.

30. Costa G, Sartori S, Åkerstedt T. Influence of flexibility and variability of working hours on health and well-being. Chronobiology International 2006; 23(6): 1125–37; Baltes BB, Briggs TE, Huff JW, Wright JA, Neuman GA. Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology 1999; 84(4): 496–513; Dizaho EK, Salleh R, Abdullah A. Achieving work life balance through flexible work schedules and arrangements. Global Business and Management Research 2017; 9: 455–65.

31. Mas A, Pallais A. Valuing alternative work arrangements. The American economic review 2017; 107(12): 3722–59.

32. Lee BY, DeVoe SE. Flextime and profitability. Industrial Relations 2012; 51(2): 298–316; Contreras F, Baykal E, Abid G. E-Leadership and teleworking in times of COVID-19 and beyond: what we know and where do we go. Frontiers in Psychology 2020; 11. 3484.

33. Gajendran RS, Harrison DA. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology 2007; 92(6): 1524–41; Virick M, DaSilva N, Arrington K. Moderators of the curvilinear relation between extent of telecommuting and job and life satisfaction: The role of performance outcome orientation and worker type. Human Relations 2010; 63(1): 137–54.

34. Golden TD, Eddleston KA. Is there a price telecommuters pay? Examining the relationship between telecommuting and objective career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2020; 116 103348; Allen TD, Golden TD, Shockley KM. How effective Is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2015; 16(2): 40–68.

35. Get used to it: The internet and covid-19. The Economist 2020; 435(9190): 73.

36. Could a four-day working week become the norm? The Economist explains, July 8, 2021.

37. Bartleby. Working hard for the money. The Economist, June 12, 2021: 61.

38. Lindström J. Does higher energy intake explain weight gain and increased metabolic risks among shift workers? Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health 2016; 42(6): 455–7; Knutsson A, BØggild H. Gastrointestinal disorders among shift workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health 2010; 36(2): 85–95.

39. de Cordova PB, Bradford MA, Stone PW. Increased errors and decreased performance at night: A systematic review of the evidence concerning shift work and quality. Work: Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation 2016; 53(4): 825–34.

40. Atkinson J, Meager N. Is flexibility just a flash in the pan? Personnel Management 1986: 26–9.

41. Hyman L. Temps, consultants, and the rise of the precarious economy. Hedgehog Review 2016; 18(1): 17–32.

42. Davis-Blake A, Broschak JP. Outsourcing and the changing nature of work. Annual Review of Sociology 2009; 35: 321–40.

43. Saleh JH, Mark G, Jordan NC. Flexibility: A multi-disciplinary literature review and a research agenda for designing flexible engineering systems. Journal of Engineering Design 2009; 20(3): 307–23.

44. Chan TCY, Fearing D. Process flexibility in baseball: The value of positional flexibility. Management Science 2018; 65(4):1642–66.

45. Akşin OZ, Çakan N, Karaesmen F, Örmeci EL. Flexibility structure and capacity design with human resource considerations. Production and Operations Management 2015; 24(7): 1086–100; Iravani SM, Van Oyen MP, Sims KT. Structural flexibility: A new perspective on the design of manufacturing and service operations. Management Science 2005; 51(2): 151–66.

46. Allwood JM, Lee WL. The impact of job rotation on problem solving skills. International Journal of Production Research 2004; 42(5): 865–81; Park PS. The examination of worker cross-training in a dual resource constrained job shop. European Journal of Operational Research 1991; 52(3): 291–9; Nembhard DA. Cross training efficiency and flexibility with process change. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 2014; 34(11): 1417–39.

47. Campion MA, Cheraskin L, Stevens MJ. Career-related antecedents and outcomes of job rotation. Academy of Management Journal 1994; 37(6): 1518–42.

48. Eriksson T, Ortega J. The adoption of job rotation: Testing the theories. ILR Review 2006; 59(4): 653–66.

49. Moorman C. Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review; 23(4): 698–723.

50. Kossek EE, Piszczek MM, McAlpine KL, Hammer LB, Burke L. Filling the holes: Work schedulers as job crafters of employment practice in long-term health care. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 2016; 69(4): 961–90; Kossek EE, Rosokha LM, Leana C. Work schedule patching in health care: Exploring implementation approaches. Work and Occupations 2020; 47(2): 228–61.

51. De Bruecker P, Van den Bergh J, Beliën J, Demeulemeester E. Workforce planning incorporating skills: State of the art. European Journal of Operational Research 2015; 243(1): 1–16.

52. Nohria N, Gulati R. Is Slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal 1996; 39(5): 1245–64.

53. Guo J, Zhou B, Zhang H, Hu C, Song M. Does strategic planning help firms translate slack resources into better performance? Journal of Management and Organization 2018; 26(4): 1–13.

1. Rosen D, Santesso A. The panopticon reviewed: Sentimentalism and eighteenth-century interiority. ELH 2010; 77(4): 1041–59; Manokha I. Surveillance, panopticism, and self-discipline in the digital age. Surveillance and Society 2018; 16(2): 219–37.

2. Santesso DR. The panopticon reviewed: Sentimentalism and eighteenth-century interiority. ELH 2010; 77(4): 141.

3. Manokha. Surveillance, panopticism, and self-discipline.

4. Mims, C. The Bezos school of management is changing the way we work. Wall Street Journal. September 11–12, 2021.

5. Nieuwenhuis M, Knight C, Postmes T, Haslam SA. The relative benefits of green versus lean office space: Three field experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied 2014; 20(3): 199–214.

6. Zhong C-B, House J. Hawthorne revisited: Organizational implications of the physical work environment. Research in Organizational Behavior 2012; 32: 3–22.

7. Sadatsafavi H, Walewski J, Shepley M. Physical work environment as a managerial tool for decreasing job-related anxiety and improving employee-employer Relations. Journal of Healthcare Management 2015; 60(2): 114–31.

8. Yorks L, Whitsett DA. Hawthorne, Topeka, and the issue of science versus advocacy in organizational behavior. Academy of Management review 1985; 10(1): 21–30.

9. Tarantini M, Pernigotto G, Gasparella A. A co-citation analysis on thermal comfort and productivity aspects in production and office buildings. Buildings 2017; 7(2): 36.

10. Wickhorst V, Geroy G. Physical communication and organization development. Organization Development Journal 2006; 24(3): 54–63.

11. Proshansky HM, Fabian AK. Psychological aspects of the quality of urban life. Boston: De Gruyter, 1986: 19–30; Jensen PA, van der Voordt TJM. Healthy workplaces: What we know and what else we need to know. Journal of Corporate Real Estate 2019; 22(2): 95–112.

12. Chan JK, Beckman SL, Lawrence PG. Workplace design: A new managerial imperative. California Management Review 2007; 49(2): 22–3; Budie B, Appel–Meulenbroek R, Kemperman A, Weijs–Perrée M. Employee satisfaction with the physical work environment: The importance of a need based approach. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 2019; 23(1): 36–49; van der Voordt TJM. Productivity and employee satisfaction in flexible workplaces. Journal of Corporate Real Estate 2004; 6(2): 133–48.

13. Jensen JL. Designing for profound experiences. Design Issues 2014; 30(3): 39–52.

14. Gjerland A, SØiland E, Thuen F. Office concepts: A scoping review. Building and Environment 2019; 163: 106294; Ashkanasy NM, Ayoko OB, Jehn KA. Understanding the physical environment of work and employee behavior: An affective events perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2014; 35(8): 1169–84.

15. MacNaughton P, Satish U, Laurent JGC, et al. The impact of working in a green certified building on cognitive function and health. Building and Environment 2017; 114: 178–86.

16. Delmas MA, Pekovic S. Environmental standards and labor productivity: Understanding the mechanisms that sustain sustainability: environmental standards and labor productivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2013; 34(2): 230–52.

17. Vischer JC. The effects of the physical environment on job performance: Towards a theoretical model of workspace stress. Stress and Health 2007; 23(3): 175–84; Choi H-H, van Merriënboer JJG, Paas F. Effects of the physical environment on cognitive load and learning: Towards a new model of cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review 2014; 26(2): 225–44.

18. Thach T-Q, Mahirah D, Sauter C, et al. Associations of perceived indoor environmental quality with stress in the workplace. Indoor Air 2020; 30(6): 1166–77.

19. Pfeffer J. The hidden costs of stressed-out workers. Life & Arts. Wall Street Journal. February 28, 2019.

20. Roberts AC, Yap HS, Kwok KW, Car J, Soh C-K, Christopoulos GI. The cubicle deconstructed: Simple visual enclosure improves perseverance. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2019; 63: 60–73.

21. Anderson CA, Anderson DC. Ambient temperature and violent crime: Tests of the linear and curvilinear hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984; 46(1): 91–7; Baron RA, Bell PA. Aggression and heat: The influence of ambient temperature, negative affect, and a cooling drink on physical aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976; 33(3): 245–55.

22. Ulrich RS. A theory of supportive design for healthcare facilities. Journal of Healthcare Design: Proceedings from the Symposium on Healthcare Design Symposium on Healthcare Design 1997; 9: 7–24.

23. Salamé P, Baddeley A. Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1982; 21(2): 150–64; Kraus, N. Hearing too much in a noisy world. Wall Street Journal. September 11–12, 2021.

24. Ribeiro FS, Santos FH, Albuquerque PB. How does allocation of emotional stimuli impact working memory tasks? An overview. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2019; 15(2): 155–68; Konstantinou N, Bahrami B, Rees G, Lavie N. Visual short-term memory load reduces retinotopic cortex response to contrast. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2012; 24(11): 2199–210.

25. Kim J, de Dear R. Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2013; 36: 18–26; Skuballa IT, Xu KM, Jarodzka H. The impact of co-actors on cognitive load: When the mere presence of others makes learning more difficult. Computers in Human Behavior 2019; 101: 30–41.

26. Klitzman S, Stellman JM. The impact of the physical environment on the psychological well-being of office workers. Social Science and Medicine 1989; 29(6): 733–42; Pejtersen J, Allermann L, Kristensen TS, Poulsen OM. Indoor climate, psychosocial work environment and symptoms in open-plan offices. Indoor Air 2006; 16(5): 392–401.

27. Lamb S, Kwok KCS. A longitudinal investigation of work environment stressors on the performance and wellbeing of office workers. Applied Ergonomics 2016; 52: 104–11.

28. James O, Delfabbro P, King DL. A comparison of psychological and work outcomes in open-plan and cellular office designs: a systematic review. SAGE open 2021; 11(1).

29. Fuhrmans V. CEOs want their offices back: Some bosses pushing back against open-floor plans. Management & Careers. Wall Street Journal. May 22, 2017.

30. Cawood S. How employee experience will change in the new office model. Employee Benefits News. June 29, 2020.

31. Open office can lead to closed minds. Economist July 28, 2018; 428(9102): 47.

32. Otterbring T, Pareigis J, Wästlund E, Makrygiannis A, Lindström A. The relationship between office type and job satisfaction: Testing a multiple mediation model through ease of interaction and well-being. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health 2018; 44(3): 330–4.

33. Allen TJ. Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R and D organization. Boston: MIT Press, 1977; Waber B, Magnolfi J, Lindsay G. Workspaces that move people. Harvard Business Review. October 2014.

34. Margolies J. Escaping the din of the open office. New York Times. February 19, 2020; Sect. B6.

35. Gibson JJ. The theory of affordances. In Gieseking JJ, Mangold W. (Eds.) The People, Place, and Space Reader. London: Routledge, 2014: 90–94.

36. Menatti L, Casado da Rocha A. Landscape and health: Connecting psychology, aesthetics, and philosophy through the concept of affordance. Frontiers in Psychology 2016; 7(May): 571; Pepper GL. The physical organization as equivocal message. Journal of Applied Communication Research 2008; 36(3): 318–38.

37. Kelling GL, Wilson JQ. Broken windows. Atlantic. March 1982.

38. Keizer K, Lindenberg S, Steg L. The spreading of disorder. Science 2008; 322(5908): 1681–5.

39. Ramos J, Torgler B. Are academics messy? Testing the broken windows theory with a field experiment in the work environment. Review of Law NS Economics 2012; 8(3): 563–77.

40. Shellenbarger S. Use your seat to get ahead at work. Life & Arts. Wall Street Journal. August 8, 2017.

41. Haapakangas A, Hongisto V, Varjo J, Lahtinen M. Benefits of quiet workspaces in open-plan offices: Evidence from two office relocations. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2018; 56: 63–75.

42. Morrison RL, Smollan RK. Open plan office space? If you’re going to do it, do it right: A fourteen-month longitudinal case study. Applied Ergonomics 2020; 82: 102933.

43. Evans J. The dark side of hip office design. Financial Times. January 5, 2020.

44. Laing A, Craig D, White A. High-performance office space. Harvard Business Review. September 1, 2011.

45. Wells M, Thelen L. What does your workspace say about you? The influence of personality, status, and workspace on personalization. Environment and Behavior 2002; 34(3): 300–21.

46. De Paoli D, Sauer E, Ropo A. The spatial context of organizations: A critique of “creative workspaces.” Journal of Management and Organization 2017; 25(2): 1–22.

47. Knight C, Haslam SA. The relative merits of lean, enriched, and empowered offices: An experimental examination of the impact of workspace management strategies on well-being and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied 2010; 16(2): 158–72.

48. Moskaliuk J, Burmeister CP, Landkammer F, Renner B, Cress U. Environmental effects on cognition and decision making of knowledge workers. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2017; 49: 43–54.

49. Tuan Y-F. Topophilia: A study of environmental perceptions, attitudes, and values. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.

50. Masterson VA, Enqvist JP, Stedman RC, Tengö M. Sense of place in social–ecological systems: From theory to empirics. Sustainability Science 2019; 14(3): 555–64; Calvard TS. Integrating organization studies and community psychology: A process model of an organizing sense of place in working lives. Journal of Community Psychology 2015; 43(6): 654–86.

51. Choudhury P, Crowston K, Dahlander L, Minervini MS, Raghuram S. GitLab: Work where you want, when you want. Journal of Organization Design 2020; 9(1): 1–17.

52. Gajendran RS, Harrison DA. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology 2007; 92(6): 1524–41.

53. Choudhury et al. GitLab: Work where you want, when you want.

54. Bindley K. A cubicle in the cloud: Some founders opt to forgo physical workplaces entirely, for now, at least. Exchange. Wall Street Journal. February 26, 2021.

55. Kuruzovich J, Paczkowski WP, Golden TD, Goodarzi S, Venkatesh V. Telecommuting and job outcomes: A moderated mediation model of system use, software quality, and social Exchange. Information and Management 2021; 58(3): 20–24.

56. Craven VD. The future of open office. Buildings 2020 114 (1).

57. Hot desk, cold comfort. Economist. September 26, 2019; 432(9162): 60.

58. Taskin L, Parmentier M, Stinglhamber F. The dark side of office designs: towards de‐humanization. New Technology, Work, and Employment 2019; 34(3): 262–84.

59. Oakman J, Oakman J, Kinsman N, Kinsman N, Briggs AM, Briggs AM. Working with persistent pain: an exploration of strategies utilised to stay productive at work. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2017; 27(1): 4–14.

60. Boutillier S, Capdevila I, Dupont L, Morel L. Collaborative spaces promoting creativity and innovation. Journal of Innovation Economics and Management 2020; 31(1): 1–9.

61. Hoff EV, Öberg NK. The role of the physical work environment for creative employees: A case study of digital artists. International Journal of Human Resource Management 2015; 26(14): 1889–906; McCoy JM. Linking the physical work environment to creative context. Journal of Creative Behavior 2005; 39(3): 169–91.

62. Lee YS. Creative workplace characteristics and innovative start-up companies. Facilities 2016; 34(7/8): 413–32.

63. Schell E, Theorell T, Saraste H. Workplace aesthetics: Impact of environments upon employee health? Work 2011; 39(3): 203–13; Mintz NL. Effects of esthetic surroundings: II. Prolonged and repeated experience in a “beautiful” and an “ugly” room. Journal of Psychology 1956; 41(2): 459–66.

64. Wilson EO. Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.

65. Cutter C, Feintzeig R. New offices seek comfort, fewer distractions. Wall Street Journal. November 25, 2019.

66. Margolies J. Making a day at the office like a walk in the park. New York Times, January 16, 2019; Higgins A. Designs for Amazon HQ2’s garden focus on a connection to nature. Washington Post. July 7, 2021.

67. Jo H, Song C, Miyazaki Y. Physiological benefits of viewing nature: A systematic review of indoor experiments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019; 16(23): 4739.

68. Park S-H, Mattson RH. Therapeutic influences of plants in hospital rooms on surgical recovery. HortScience 2009; 44(1): 102–5.

69. Kaplan R. The nature of the view from home: psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior 2001; 33(4): 507–42; Kaplan R. The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning 1993; 26(1–4): 193–201.

70. Sheikh K. Enjoy 2 hours a week in nature, doctors say. New York Times. June 13, 2019; Sect. D4.

71. Brown, DK, Barton, JL, Pretty, J, and Gladwell, VF. Walks4work: Assessing the role of the natural environment in a workplace physical activity intervention. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health 2014; 40(4): 390–9.

72. Morris B. For better health, just head outdoors. Health & Wellness. Wall Street Journal. February 14, 2021.

73. Hartig T. Where best to take a booster break? American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2006; 31(4): 350.

74. Webb CE, Rossignac-Milon M, Higgins ET. Stepping forward together: Could walking facilitate interpersonal conflict resolution? American Psychologist 2017; 72(4): 374–85.

75. Razani N. Nature and health in practice. Parks Stewardship Forum 2021; 37(1): 17–23.

76. An M, Colarelli SM, O’Brien K, Boyajian ME. Why we need more nature at work: Effects of natural elements and sunlight on employee mental health and work attitudes. PLoS One 2016; 11(5): e0155614; Largo-Wight E, Chen WW, Dodd V, Weiler R. Healthy workplaces: The effects of nature contact at work on employee stress and health. Public Health Reports 2011; 126(Suppl 1): 124–30.

77. Madeddu M, Zhang X. Harmonious spaces: the influence of Feng Shui on urban form and design. Journal of Urban Design 2017; 22(6): 709–25; Whedon GA. Frames of reference that address the impact of physical environments on occupational performance. Work 2000; 14(2): 165–74.

78. Stellar JE, Gordon AM, Piff PK, et al. Self-transcendent emotions and their social functions: compassion, gratitude, and awe bind us to others through prosociality. Emotion Review 2017; 9(3): 200–7; Keltner D, Haidt J. Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion 2010; 17(2): 297–314.

79. Piff P, Keltner D. Why do we experience awe? New York Times. May 22, 2015; Zhang JW, Piff PK, Iyer R, Koleva S, Keltner D. An occasion for unselfing: Beautiful nature leads to prosociality. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2014; 37: 61–72; Bai Y, Ocampo J, Jin G, et al. Awe, daily stress, and elevated life satisfaction. Journal of personality and social psychology 2021; 120(4): 837–60.

80. Miller L, Balodis IM, McClintock CH, et al. Neural correlates of personalized spiritual experiences. Cerebral Cortex 2019; 29(6): 2331–8.

81. Shusterman R. Art as dramatization. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 2001; 59(4): 363–72.

82. Klotz AC. Creating jobs and workspaces that energize people: MIT Sloan Management Review 2020; 61(4): 74–8.

1. Roberson QM. Diversity in the workplace: A review, synthesis, and future research agenda. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 2019; 6(1): 69–88.

2. Lynch FR. Corporate diversity. Society 2005; 42(3): 40–7; Oswick C, Noon M. Discourses of diversity, equality and inclusion: Trenchant formulations or transient fashions? British Journal of Management 2014; 25(1): 23–39.

3. Grant RM. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 1996; 17(S2): 109–22.

4. Nielsen S, Huse M. The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance 2010; 18(2): 136–48; Nielsen S, Huse M. Women directors’ contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: The role of equality perception. European Management Review 2010; 7(1): 16–29.

5. Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M. assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal 1996; 39(5): 1154–84.

6. Mayer RC, Warr RS, Zhao J. Do pro‐diversity policies improve corporate innovation? Financial Management 2018; 47(3): 617–50.

7. Hector A. Ecology: Diversity favours productivity. Nature 2011; 472(7341): 45–6.

8. Lilienfeld DE, Beekman N. The imperative for gender diversity on boards. Corporate Governance Advisor 2014; 22(3): 19–22.

9. Sarhan AA, Ntim CG, Al‐Najjar B. Board diversity, corporate governance, corporate performance, and executive pay. International Journal of Finance and Economics 2018; 24(2): 761–86.

10. White G. Promoting gender parity on boards: A holistic diversity and inclusion strategy. Cost Management 2020; 34(3): 20–24.

11. Sabatier M. A women’s boom in the boardroom: effects on performance? Applied Economics 2015; 47(26): 2717–27.

12. Kim D, Starks LT. Gender diversity on corporate boards: Do women contribute unique skills? American Economic Review 2016; 106(5): 267–71.

13. Khatib SFA, Abdullah DF, Elamer AA, Abueid R. Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions. Business Strategy and the Environment 2021; 30(2): 985–1002.

14. Eagly AH. When passionate advocates meet research on diversity, does the honest broker stand a chance? Journal of Social Issues 2016; 72(1): 199–222; Benkraiem R, Hamrouni A, Lakhal F, Toumi N. Board independence, gender diversity and CEO compensation. Corporate Governance 2017; 17(5): 845–60.

15. Creek SA, Kuhn KM, Sahaym A. Board diversity and employee satisfaction: The mediating role of progressive programs. Group and Organization Management 2017; 44(3): 521–48.

16. Herring C. Is diversity still a good thing? American Sociological Review 2017; 82(4): 868–77.

17. Talke K, Salomo S, Kock A. Top management team diversity and strategic innovation orientation: The relationship and consequences for innovativeness and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2011; 28(6): 819–32.

18. Ruiz-Jiménez JM, Fuentes-Fuentes MdM, Ruiz-Arroyo M. Knowledge combination capability and innovation: The effects of gender diversity on top management teams in technology-based firms. Journal of Business Ethics 2014; 135(3): 503–15.

19. Li J, Meyer B, Shemla M, Wegge J. From being diverse to becoming diverse: A dynamic team diversity theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2018; 39(8): 956–70.

20. Fenwick GD, Neal DJ. Effect of gender composition on group performance. Gender, Work, and Organization 2001; 8(2): 222–5; Hoogendoorn S, Oosterbeek H, van Praag M. The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Science 2013; 59(7): 1514–28.

21. Gompers P, Kovvali S. The other diversity dividend. Harvard Business Review. July 1, 2018.

22. Levine SS, Apfelbaum EP, Bernard M, Bartelt VL, Zajac EJ, Stark D. Ethnic diversity deflates price bubbles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2014; 111(52): 18524–9.

23. Pennekamp F, Pontarp M, Tabi A, et al. Biodiversity increases and decreases ecosystem stability. Nature 2018; 563(7729): 109–12.

24. Page SE. Where diversity comes from and why it matters? European Journal of Social Psychology 2014; 44(4): 267–79.

25. Greene RR. Resilience as effective functional capacity: An ecological-stress model. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 2014; 24(8): 937–50.

26. Ives AR, Carpenter SR. Stability and diversity of ecosystems. Science 2007; 317(5834): 58–62.

27. Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, et al. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2004; 35(1): 557–81.

28. Bonabeau E. Understanding and managing complexity risk. MIT Sloan Management Review 2007; 48(4): 62–91.

29. MacDougall AS, McCann KS, Gellner G, Turkington R. Diversity loss with persistent human disturbance increases vulnerability to ecosystem collapse. Nature 2013; 494(7435): 86–9.

30. Deller S, Watson P. Spatial variations in the relationship between economic diversity and stability. Applied Economics Letters 2016; 23(7): 520–5.

31. Leslie P, McCabe JT. Response diversity and resilience in social-ecological systems. Current Anthropology 2013; 54(2): 114–44; Schoen C, Rost K. What really works?! Evaluating the effectiveness of practices to increase the managerial diversity of women and minorities. European Management Journal 2021; 39(1): 95–108.

32. Fugère MA, Cathey C, Beetham R, Haynes M, Schaedler RA. Preference for the diversity policy label versus the affirmative action policy label. Social Justice Research 2016; 29(2): 206–27.

33. Surowiecki J. Valley boys. New Yorker. November 17, 2014.

34. O’Brien KR, Scheffer M, van Nes EH, Van Der Lee R. How to break the cycle of low workforce diversity: A model for change. PLoS One 2015; 10(7): e0133208; Kogut B, Colomer J, Belinky M. structural equality at the top of the corporation: mandated quotas for women directors. Strategic Management Journal 2014; 35(6): 891–902.

35. Miller C. Affirmative action and its persistent effects: A new perspective. California Management Review 2019; 61(3): 19–33.

36. Schlachter SD, Pieper JR. Employee referral hiring in organizations: An integrative conceptual review, model, and agenda for future research. Journal of Applied Psychology 2019; 104(11): 1325–46; Pieper JR, Trevor CO, Weller I, Duchon D. Referral hire presence implications for referrer turnover and job performance. Journal of Management 2019; 45(5): 1858–88.

37. Agarwal S, Qian W, Reeb DM, Sing TF. Playing the boys game: Golf buddies and board diversity. American Economic Review 2016; 106(5): 272–6.

38. Shellenbarger S. The perils of "cultural fit": Efforts can veer into a ditch if hires look, think and act alike. Life & Arts. Wall Street Journal. September 23, 2019.

39. Byrne D. Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1961; 62(3): 713–5; Alves H. Sharing rare attitudes attracts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2018; 44(8): 1270–83.

40. Hackett JD, Hogg MA. The diversity paradox: When people who value diversity surround themselves with like‐minded others. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2014; 44(6): 415–22.

41. Almandoz J, Tilcsik A. When experts become liabilities: Domain experts on boards and organizational failure. Academy of Management Journal 2016; 59(4): 1124–49.

42. Park G. Blizzard president Brack allowed toxicity to fester, according to lawsuit. Washington Post. July 22, 2021.

43. Sommers SR. On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006; 90(4): 597–612; Triana MdC, Jayasinghe M, Pieper JR. Perceived workplace racial discrimination and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2015; 36(4): 491–513.

44. Dhanani LY, Beus JM, Joseph DL. Workplace discrimination: A meta‐analytic extension, critique, and future research agenda. Personnel Psychology 2018; 71(2): 147–79.

45. Kline PM, Rose EK, Walters CR. Systemic discrimination among large U.S. employers. National Bureau of Economic Research, August, 2021.

46. Hangartner D, Kopp D, Siegenthaler M. Monitoring hiring discrimination through online recruitment platforms. Nature 2021; 589(7843): 572–76.

47. Phillips KWP, Lount JRB, Sheldon O, Rink F. The biases that punish racially diverse teams. Harvard Business Review. February 22, 2016; Phillips KW. How diversity works. Scientific American. October 2014: 43–7; Hebl M, Cheng SK, Ng LC. Modern discrimination in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology And Organizational Behavior 2020; 7(1): 257–82.

48. Hoyt CL, Burnette JL. Gender bias in leader evaluations: Merging implicit theories and role congruity perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2013; 39(10): 1306–19.

49. Henry A. What to do when you feel marginalized? Business/Financial Desk. New York Times. October 7, 2019; Sect. B7.

50. Heilman ME, Haynes MC. No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women’s success in male-female teams. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005; 90(5): 905–16.

51. Foschi M. Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology 2000; 26(1): 21–42.

52. Pasquerella L, Clauss-Ehlers CS. Glass cliffs, queen bees, and the snow-woman effect: Persistent barriers to women’s leadership in the academy. Liberal Education 2017; 103(2): 6.

53. Williams MT. Microaggressions: Clarification, evidence, and impact. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2019; 15(1): 3–26; Pierce CM, Carew JV, Pierce-Gonzalez D, Wills D. An experiment in racism: TV commercials. Education and Urban Society 1977; 10(1): 61–87.

54. Sue DW, Capodilupo CM, Torino GC, et al. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. The American Psychologist 2007; 62(4): 271–86.

55. Crespo G. Doctor says she was racially profiled while trying to help fellow passenger. CNN. November 1, 2018.

56. Goldberg E. It can cause you to shrink. New York Times. 2020; Sect. D4.

57. Leslie LM. Diversity initiative effectiveness: A typological theory of unintended consequences. Academy of Management Review 2019; 44(3): 538–63; Koch AJ, D’Mello SD, Sackett PR. A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology 2015; 100(1): 128–61.

58. Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E. Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review 2016; 71(4): 589–617.

59. McDonald ML, Westphal JD. Access denied: Low mentoring of women and minority first-time directors and its negative effects on appointments to additional boards. Academy of Management Journal 2013; 56(4): 1169–98.

60. Wolgast S, Bäckström M, Björklund F. Tools for fairness: Increased structure in the selection process reduces discrimination. PLoS One 2017; 12(12): e0189512.

61. Axt JR, Lai CK. Reducing discrimination: A bias versus noise perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2019; 117(1): 26–49.

62. Goldin C, Rouse C. Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. American Economic Review 2000; 90(4): 715–41.

63. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.

64. Amodio DM, Swencionis JK. Proactive control of implicit bias: A theoretical model and implications for behavior change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2018; 115(2): 255–75; Bugg JM, Crump MJC. In support of a distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven control: A review of the literature on proportion congruent effects. Frontiers in Psychology 2012; 3: 367.

65. Miller CC. Why mothers’ choices often feel like no choice. New York Times. January 19, 2020; Sect. BU1.

66. Andrews H. Who will defend the American family? New York Times. April 28, 2019; Sect. SR1; Hirko C. Women did everything right. Then work got greedy. New York Times. April 28, 2019.

67. Pasquerella et al. Glass cliffs, queen bees, and the snow-woman effect.

68. Groysberg B, Bell D. Dysfunction in the boardroom. Harvard Business Review. June 2013.

69. Simons SM, Rowland KN. Diversity and its impact on organizational performance: the influence of diversity constructions on expectations and outcomes. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation 2011; 6(3): 171–83.

70. Bertrand O, Lumineau F. Partners in crime: The effects of diversity on the longevity of cartels. Academy of Management Journal 2016; 59(3): 983–1008; Harrison DA, Klein KJ. What’s the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review 2007; 32(4): 1199–228.

71. Solanas Pérez A, Selvam RM, Navarro Cid J, Leiva Ureña D. Some common indexes of group diversity: upper boundaries. Psychological Reports 2012; 111(3): 777–96; Maturo F, Migliori S, Paolone F. Measuring and monitoring diversity in organizations through functional instruments with an application to ethnic workforce diversity of the U.S. federal agencies. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 2018; 25(4): 357–88.

72. Blau PM. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press, 1977.

73. Danbold F, Unzueta MM. Drawing the diversity line: Numerical thresholds of diversity vary by group status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2020; 118(2): 283–306.

74. Forman L. Critical mass is key for women in business: Companies and boards with many women, not just token females, may outperform their peers. Markets. Wall Street Journal. August 14, 2019.

75. Elstad B, Ladegard G. Women on corporate boards: Key influencers or tokens? Journal of Management and Governance 2010; 16(4): 595–615.

76. Garcia Martinez M, Zouaghi F, Garcia Marco T. Diversity is strategy: The effect of R&D team diversity on innovative performance. R&D Management 2017; 47(2): 311–29.

77. Downey SN, van der Werff L, Thomas KM, Plaut VC. The role of diversity practices and inclusion in promoting trust and employee engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2015; 45(1): 35–44.

78. Reagans R, Zuckerman EW. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science 2001; 12(4): 502–17.

79. Svyantek DJ, Mahoney KT, Brown LL. Diversity and effectiveness in the Roman and Persian empires. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 2002; 10(3): 260–83; Svyantek DJ, Bott J. Received wisdom and the relationship between diversity and organizational performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 2004; 12(3): 295–317.

80. Reed H. Corporations as agents of social change: A case study of diversity at Cummins Inc. Business History 2017; 59(6): 821–43.

81. Highhouse S. A history of the T-Group and its early applications in management development. Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice 2002; 6(4): 277–90.

82. Brown CB, Orr D. Influential DNA: A study of prominent women and their impact on the field of organization development. Organization Development Journal 2010; 28(3): 27–40; Waclawski J, Church AH, Burke WW. Women in organization development: A profile of the intervention styles and values of today’s practitioners. Journal of Organizational Change Management 1995; 8(1): 12–22.

83. Hajro A, Gibson CB, Pudelko M. Knowledge exchange processes in multicultural teams: Linking organizational diversity climates to teams’ effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal 2017; 60(1): 345–72; Devine PG, Ash TL. Diversity training Goals, limitations, and promise: a review of the multidisciplinary literature. Annual Review of Psychology 2022; 73(1).

84. Anand R, Winters M-F. A Retrospective view of corporate diversity training from 1964 to the present. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2008; 7(3): 356–72; Lipman J. How diversity training infuriates men and fails women. Time. January 25, 2018.

85. Bezrukova K, Spell CS, Perry JL, Jehn KA. A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychological Bulletin 2016; 142(11): 1227–74; Onyeador IN, Hudson S-kTJ, Lewis NA. Moving beyond implicit bias training: Policy insights for increasing organizational diversity. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2021; 8(1): 19–26.

86. Murrar S, Campbell MR, Brauer M. Exposure to peers’ pro-diversity attitudes increases inclusion and reduces the achievement gap. Nature Human Behaviour 2020; 4(9): 889–97.

87. Pearsall MJ, Ellis APJ, Evans JM. Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: Is activation the key? Journal of Applied Psychology 2008; 93(1): 225–34.

88. van Peteghem M, Bruynseels L, Gaeremynck A. Beyond diversity: A tale of faultlines and frictions in the board of directors. Accounting Review 2018; 93(2): 339–67.

1. Chambers EG, Foulton M, Handfield-Jones H, Hankin SM, Michaels III EG. The war for talent. McKinsey Quarterly 1998; (3): 44–57.

2. O’Connor S. World will have 13 ‘super-aged’ nations by 2020. Financial Times. August 6, 2014.

3. Perez Arce F, Prados MJ. The decline in the U.S. labor force participation rate: a literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys 2021; 35(2): 615–52.

4. Abbott B. At 30-year low, U.S. birth rate shows striking differences between states. Wall Street Journal. January 10, 2019.

5. Jain N, Bhatt P. Employment preferences of job applicants: Unfolding employer branding determinants. Journal of Management Development 2015; 34(6): 634–52.

6. 2017 Training industry report. Excelsior, MN: Lakewood Media Group, 2017.

7. Nguyen TN, Truong Q, Buyens D. The relationship between training and firm performance: A literature review. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management 2010; 18(1): 36–45.

8. Dostie B. The impact of training on innovation. ILR Review 2018; 71(1): 64–87; Sung SY, Choi JN. Effects of training and development on employee outcomes and firm innovative performance: Moderating roles of voluntary participation and evaluation. Human Resource Management 2018; 57(6): 1339–53.

9. Jacobs RL, Washington C. Employee development and organizational performance: A review of literature and directions for future research. Human Resource Development International 2003; 6(3): 343–54.

10. Crook TR, Todd SY, Combs JG, Woehr DJ, Ketchen DJ. Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2011; 96(3): 443–56; Xu J, Liu F. The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: A modified and extended VAIC model. Journal of Competitiveness 2020; 12(1): 161–76.

11. Dumay J, Garanina T. Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2013; 14(1): 10–25; Pedro E, Leitão J, Alves H. Back to the future of intellectual capital research: A systematic literature review. Management Decision 2018; 56(11): 2502–83.

12. Bagdadli S, Gianecchini M. Organizational career management practices and objective career success: A systematic review and framework. Human Resource Management Review 2018; 29(3): 353–70.

13. Martin BO, Kolomitro K, Lam TCM. Training methods: A review and analysis. Human Resource Development Review 2014; 13(1): 11–35.

14. Whyte WH. The organization man. Oxford: Simon and Schuster; 1956.

15. Carnevale AP, Smith N. Workplace basics: The skills employees need and employers want. Human Resource Development International 2013; 16(5): 491–501.

16. Erdogan B, Bauer TN, Truxillo DM, Mansfield LR. Whistle while you work: A review of the life satisfaction literature. Journal of Management 2012; 38(4): 1038–83; Haar JM, Roche MA. Family supportive organization perceptions and employee outcomes: The mediating effects of life satisfaction. International Journal of Human Resource Management 2010; 21(7): 999–1014; McNall LA, Nicklin JM, Masuda AD. A meta-analytic review of the consequences associated with work–family enrichment. Journal of Business and Psychology 2010; 25(3): 381–96.

17. Greenhaus JH, Powell GN. When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review 2006; 31(1): 77–92.

18. Eldor L, Westring AF, Friedman SD. The indirect effect of holistic career values on work engagement: A longitudinal study spanning two decades. Applied Psychology: Health and well-being 2020; 12(1): 144–65.

19. Leung ASM, Cheung YH, Liu X. The relations between life domain satisfaction and subjective well-being. Journal of Managerial Psychology 2011; 26(2): 155–69.

20. Cho E, Tay L. Domain satisfaction as a mediator of the relationship between work-family spillover and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business and Psychology 2016; 31(3): 445–57; Heidemeier H, Göritz AS. Individual differences in how work and nonwork life domains contribute to life satisfaction: Using factor mixture modeling for classification. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being 2013; 14(6): 1765–88; Ilies R, Liu X-Y, Liu Y, Zheng X. Why do employees have better family lives when they are highly engaged at work? Journal of Applied Psychology 2017; 102(6): 956–70; Judge TA, Watanabe S. Another look at the job satisfaction: Life satisfaction relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology 1993; 78(6): 939–48; Wolfram HJ, Gratton L. Spillover between work and home, role importance and life satisfaction. British Journal of Management 2014; 25(1): 77–90.

21. Ferreira P, Gabriel C, Faria S, Rodrigues P, Sousa Pereira M. What if employees brought their life to work? The relation of life satisfaction and work engagement. Sustainability 2020; 12(7): 2743.

22. Greenbaum RL, Babalola M, Quade MJ, Guo L, Kim YC. Moral burden of bottom-line pursuits: How and when perceptions of top management bottom-line mentality inhibit supervisors’ ethical leadership practices. Journal of Business Ethics June 2020, 1–15; Babalola MT, Mawritz MB, Greenbaum RL, Ren S, Garba OA. Whatever It Takes: How and When Supervisor Bottom-Line Mentality Motivates Employee Contributions in the Workplace. Journal of Management 2021; 47(5): 1134–54.

23. Babalola MT, Greenbaum RL, Amarnani RK, et al. A business frame perspective on why perceptions of top management’s bottom‐line mentality result in employees’ good and bad behaviors. Personnel Psychology 2020; 73(1): 19–41.

24. Sirgy MJ, Lee D-J. Work-life balance: An integrative review. Applied Research in Quality of Life 2017.

25. Butts MM, Casper WJ, Yang TS. How important are work–family support policies? A meta-analytic investigation of their effects on employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology 2013; 98(1): 1–25; Fiksenbaum LM. Supportive work–family environments: Implications for work–family conflict and well-being. International Journal of Human Resource Management 2014; 25(5): 653–72; Renaud S, Morin L, Béchard A. Traditional benefits versus perquisites: A longitudinal test of their differential impact on employee turnover. Journal of Personnel Psychology 2017; 16(2): 91–103.

26. Drobnič S, Beham B, Präg P. Good job, good life? Working conditions and quality of life in Europe. Social Indicators Research 2010; 99(2): 205–25.

27. Greenhaus JH, Powell GN. When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review 2006; 31(1): 72–92.

28. Cherrstrom CA, Bixby J. Construct of expertise within the context of HRD: Integrative literature review. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2018.

29. André D, Fernand G. Sherlock Holmes: An expert’s view of expertise. British Journal of Psychology 2008; 99(1): 109–25.

30. Ullén F, Hambrick DZ, Mosing MA. Rethinking expertise: A multifactorial gene-environment interaction model of expert performance. Psychological Bulletin 2016; 142(4): 427–46.

31. Dweck CS. Mindsets and human nature: Promoting change in the Middle East, the schoolyard, the racial divide, and willpower. American Psychologist 2012; 67(8): 614–22.

32. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Römer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review 1993; 100(3): 363–406; Ericsson KA, Towne TJ. Expertise. WIREs Cognitive Science 2010; 1(3): 404–16.

33. Heslin PA, VandeWalle D. Managers’ implicit assumptions about personnel. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2008; 17(3): 219–23.

34. Lyons PR, Bandura RP. Apprehending mindsets in employee development. Human Resource Management International Digest 2017; 25(3): 4–7.

35. Miller AG, Jones EE, Hinkle S. A robust attribution error in the personality domain. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1981; 17(6): 587–600.

36. Han SJ, Stieha V. Growth mindset for human resource development: A scoping review of the literature with recommended interventions. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2020.

37. Yeager DS, Hanselman P, Walton GM, et al. A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature 2019; 573(7774): 364–9; Murphy F, Gash H. I can’t yet and growth mindset. Constructivist Foundations 2020; 15(2): 83–94.

38. Gladwell M. Outliers: The story of success. New York: Little, Brown, 2008.

39. Weiss DJ, Shanteau J. Who’s the best? A relativistic view of expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2014; 28(4): 447–57.

40. Vaci N, Edelsbrunner P, Stern E, Neubauer A, Bilalić M, Grabner RH. The joint influence of intelligence and practice on skill development throughout the life span. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2019; 116(37): 18363–9.

41. Hambrick DZ, Burgoyne AP, Macnamara BN, Ullén F. Toward a multifactorial model of expertise: Beyond born versus made. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2018; 1423(1): 284–95.

42. Ullén, Hambrick, Mosing. Rethinking expertise.

43. Burns ST. Validity of person matching in vocational interest inventories. Career Development Quarterly 2014; 62(2): 114–27; Van Iddekinge CH, Roth PL, Putka DJ, Lanivich SE. Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology 2011; 96(6): 1167–94.

44. Harrington T, Long J. The history of interest inventories and career assessments in career counseling. Career Development Quarterly 2013; 61(1): 83–92; Holland JL. A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1959; 6(1): 35–45; Holland JL. Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments, 3rd ed. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1997; Dik BJ, O’Connor WF, Shimizu AB, Duffy RD. Personal growth and well-being at work: Contributions of vocational psychology. Journal of Career Development 2019; 46(1): 31–47.

45. Strauss K, Griffin MA, Parker SK. Future work selves: How salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology 2012; 97(3): 580–98.

46. Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2004.

47. Bakker AB, van Woerkom M. Strengths use in organizations: A positive approach of occupational health. Canadian Psychology 2018; 59(1): 38–46; Douglass R, Duffy R. Strengths use and life satisfaction: A moderated mediation approach. Journal of Happiness Studies 2015; 16(3): 619–32; Littman-Ovadia H, Lavy S, Boiman-Meshita M. When theory and research collide: Examining correlates of signature strengths use at work. Journal of Happiness Studies 2017; 18(2): 527–48; Woerkom M, Meyers MC. Strengthening personal growth: The effects of a strengths intervention on personal growth initiative. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 2018; Josefina Pelaez M, Coo C, Salanova M. Facilitating work engagement and performance through strengths-based micro-coaching: A controlled trial study. Journal of Happiness Studies 2020; 21(4): 1265–84.

48. Allen TD, Eby LT, Poteet ML, Lentz E, Lima L. Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 2004; 89(1): 127–36; Jones RJ, Woods SA, Guillaume YRF. The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta‐analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 2016; 89(2): 249–77.

49. Wrzesniewski A, Dutton JE. Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review 2001; 26(2): 179–201.

50. Rossi MA, Yin HH. Methods for studying habitual behavior in mice. Current Protocols in Neuroscience 2012; 60(1): 8.29.1–8.29.9; Hilario MRF. High on habits. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2008; 2(2): 208–17; Yin HH, Knowlton BJ. The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2006; 7(6): 464–76.

51. Mayer JD, Caruso DR, Salovey P. The ability model of emotional intelligence: Principles and updates. Emotion Review 2016; 8(4): 290–300.

52. O’Boyle EH, Jr., Humphrey RH, Pollack JM, Hawver TH, Story PA. The relation between emotional intelligence and job performance: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2011; 32(5): 788–818.

53. Nelis D, Kotsou I, Quoidbach J, et al. Increasing emotional competence improves psychological and physical well-being, social relationships, and employability. Emotion 2011; 11(2): 354–66.

54. van Rooij SW, Merkebu J. Measuring the business impact of employee learning: A view from the professional services sector. Human Resource Development Quarterly 2015; 26(3): 275–97.

55. Marsick VJ, Volpe M. The nature and need for informal learning. Advances in Developing Human Resources 2016; 1(3): 1–9; Marsick VJ, Watkins KE. Facilitating learning organizations: making learning count. Aldershot, UK: Gower, 1999.

56. Onken-Menke G, Nüesch S, Kröll C. Are you attracted? Do you remain? Meta-analytic evidence on flexible work practices. Business Research 2018; 11(2): 239–77.

57. Paik SJ, Gozali C, Marshall‐Harper KR. Productive giftedness: A new mastery approach to understanding talent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 2019; 2019(168): 131–59.

1. Argyris C. Empowerment: The emperor’s new clothes. Harvard Business Review 1998; 76(3): 98–105; Maynard MT, Gilson LL, Mathieu JE. Empowerment: Fad or fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research. Journal of Management 2012; 38(4): 1231–81; Maynard MT, Luciano MM, D’Innocenzo L, Mathieu JE, Dean MD. Modeling time-lagged reciprocal psychological empowerment–performance relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology 2014; 99(6): 1244–53.

2. Maynard, Gilson, Mathieu. Empowerment—fad or fab?; Maynard et al. Modeling time-lagged reciprocal psychological empowerment; Seibert SE, Wang G, Courtright SH. Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology 2011; 96(5): 981–1003.

3. Raub S, Liao H. Doing the right thing without being told: Joint effects of initiative climate and general self-efficacy on employee proactive customer service performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2012; 97(3): 651–67.

4. Lorinkova NM, Pearsall MJ, Sims Jr HP. Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams. Academy of Management Journal 2013; 56(2): 573–96.

5. Maynard et al. Modeling time-lagged reciprocal psychological empowerment.

6. Seibert, Wang, Courtright. Antecedents and consequences; Raub, Liao H. Doing the right thing; Lorinkova, Pearsall, Sims Jr. Examining the differential longitudinal performance; Grealish A, Tai S, Hunter A, Emsley R, Murrells T, Morrison AP. Does empowerment mediate the effects of psychological factors on mental health, well‐being, and recovery in young people? Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 2017; 90(3): 314–35; Koontz H. Making theory operational: the span of management. Journal of Management Studies 1966; 3: 229–43.

7. Frazier ML, Fainshmidt S. Voice climate, work outcomes, and the mediating role of psychological empowerment: A multilevel examination. Group and Organization Management 2012; 37(6): 691–715.

8. Prasad P, Eylon D. Narrating past traditions of participation and inclusion: Historical perspectives on workplace empowerment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2001; 37(1): 5–14.

9. O’Connor ES. Back on the way to empowerment: The example of Ordway Tead and industrial democracy. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2001; 37(1): 15–32.

10. O’Connor. Back on the way to empowerment; Kaufman BE. The theory and practice of strategic HRM and participative management. Human Resource Management Review 2001; 11(4): 505–33.

11. Kaufman B. Divergent fates: Company unions and employee involvement committees under the railway labor and national labor relations acts. Labor History 2015; 56(4): 423–58.

12. DeStefanis AR. The road to Ludlow: breaking the 1913–14 southern Colorado coal strike. Journal of the Historical Society 2012; 12(3): 341–90; Deutsch S. Making an American workforce: The Colorado Fuel & Iron Company’s construction of a workforce during the Rockefeller years. Boulder: University of Colorado Press, 2014.

13. Likert R. New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1961.

14. Miller KI, Monge PR. Participation, satisfaction, and productivity: a meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal 1986; 29(4): 727–53.

15. Mowbray PK, Wilkinson A, Tse HHM. An integrative review of employee voice: Identifying a common conceptualization and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 2015; 17(3): 382–400.

16. Wilkinson A, Fay C. New times for employee voice? Human Resource Management 2011; 50(1): 65–74.

17. Cavendish R. Henry Hudson sails into Hudson Bay. London: History Today, 2010; Drabelle D. Mutiny on the Hudson. Washington Post. August 23, 2009; McCoy RM. Henry Hudson has a very bad day, 1607, 1608, 1609, 1610. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012; Miller J. Accidental explorer. Peterborough, NH: Carus, 2007.

18. Deming WE. Opportunities in mathematical statistics, with special reference to sampling and quality control. Science 1943; 97(2514): 209–14.

19. Lawler III EE, Mohrman SA. Quality circles after the fad. Harvard Business Review 1985; 63(1): 64–71.

20. Pereira GM, Osburn HG. Effects of participation in decision making on performance and employee attitudes: A quality circles meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology 2007; 22(2): 145–53.

21. Bernstein E, Bunch J, Canner N, Lee M. Beyond the holacracy hype. Harvard Business Review 2016; 94(7/8): 38–49; Mintzberg H, McHugh A. Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative Science Quarterly 1985; 30(2): 160–97.

22. Moss Kanter R. Power failure in management circuits. Harvard Business Review 1979; 57(4): 65–75; Kanter RM. When giants learn to dance: Mastering the challenge of strategy, management, and careers in the 1990s. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989.

23. Jaehoon R, Seo Dae S, Bozorov F, Dedahanov AT. organizational structure and employees’ innovative behavior: the mediating role of empowerment. Social Behavior and Personality 2017; 45(9): 1523–36; Dust SB, Resick CJ, Mawritz MB. Transformational leadership, psychological empowerment, and the moderating role of mechanistic–organic contexts. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2014; 35(3): 413–33.

24. Fayol H. General and industrial management. London: Pitmin 1949.

25. Guadalupe M, Li H, Wulf J. Who Lives in the C-Suite? Organizational structure and the division of labor in top management. Management Science 2014; 60(4): 824–44.

26. Meier KJ, Bohte J. Ode to Luther Gulick. Administration and Society 2000; 32(2): 115–137; Orth U, Robins RW, Widaman KF. Life-span development of self-esteem and its effects on important life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2012; 102(6): 1271–88; Urwick LF. V. A. Graicunas and the span of control. Academy of Management Journal 1974; 17(2): 349–54; Van Fleet DD, Bedeian AG. A history of the span of management. Academy of Management Review 1977; 2(3): 356–72.

27. Wulf J. The flattened firm: Not as advertised. California Management Review 2012; 55(1): 5–23.

28. Drucker PF. The knowledge society. New Society 1969; 13(343): 24–631.

29. Spreitzer GM. Psychological, empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal 1995; 38(5): 1442–65; Conger JA, Kanungo RN. The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review 1988; 13(3): 471–82.

30. Hackman JR, Oldham GR. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1976; 16(2): 250–79.

31. Spreitzer GM. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal 1995; 38(5): 1442–65.

32. Grant AM. How customers can rally the troops. Harvard Business Review 2011; 89(6): 96–103.

33. Cameron KS, Spreitzer GM. The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.

34. Bacon TR, Pugh DG. Ritz-Carlton and EMC: The gold standards in operational behavioral differentiation. Journal of Organizational Excellence 2004; 23(2): 61–76; Yeung A. Setting people up for success: How the Portman Ritz‐Carlton hotel gets the best from its people. Human Resource Management 2006; 45(2): 267–75.

35. Reece A, Yaden D, Kellerman G, et al. Mattering is an indicator of organizational health and employee success. Journal of Positive Psychology 2021; 16(2): 228–48.

36. Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist 1989; 44(9): 1175–84.

37. Kirkman BL, Rosen B. Powering up teams. Organizational Dynamics 2000; 28(3): 48–66.

38. McNatt DB. Ancient Pygmalion Joins contemporary management: A meta-analysis of the result. Journal of Applied Psychology 2000; 85(2): 314–22.

39. Babad EY, Inbar J, Rosenthal R. Pygmalion, galatea, and the golem: Investigations of biased and unbiased teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology 1982; 74(4): 459–74.

40. Menon ST. Employee empowerment: An integrative psychological approach. Applied Psychology 2001; 50(1): 153–80; Li Y, Wei F, Ren S, Di Y. Locus of control, psychological empowerment and intrinsic motivation relation to performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology 2015; 30(4): 422–38; Huang X. Helplessness of empowerment: The joint effect of participative leadership and controllability attributional style on empowerment and performance. Human Relations 2012; 65(3): 313–34.

41. Maier SF, Seligman MEP. Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. Psychological Review 2016; 123(4): 349–67.

42. Kim M, Beehr TA, Prewett MS. Employee responses to empowering leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 2018; 25(3): 257–76; Pigeon M, Montani F, Boudrias J-S. How do empowering conditions lead to empowered behaviours? Test of a mediation model. Journal of Managerial Psychology 2017; 32(5): 357–72.

43. Schultz JR. Creating a culture of empowerment fosters the flexibility to change. Global Business and Organizational Excellence 2014; 34(1): 41–50.

44. Pratto F. On power and empowerment. British Journal of Social Psychology 2016; 55(1): 1–20.

45. Treviño LK, Brown ME. Ethical leadership. In Day DV. (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014: 524–38; Bass BM. From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational dynamics 1990; 18(3): 19–31.

46. Greenleaf RK. The servant as leader. In Vecchio RP. (Eds.) Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007: 407–15.

47. Zhang X, Bartol KM. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal 2010; 53(1): 107–28; Wong SI, Giessner SR. The thin line between empowering and laissez-faire leadership: An expectancy-match perspective. Journal of Management 2018; 44(2): 757–83; Lee A, Willis S, Tian AW. Empowering leadership: A meta‐analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2018; 39(3): 306–25; Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Zhang L, Xu S, Liu X, Chen W. A meta-analytic review of the consequences of servant leadership: The moderating roles of cultural factors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 2019; 38(1): 371–80.

48. Chanhoo S, Kwangseo Ryan P, Seung-Wan K. Servant leadership and team performance: The mediating role of knowledge-sharing climate. Social Behavior and Personality 2015; 43(10): 1749–60.

49. Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Chenwei L, Meuser JD. Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal 2014; 57(5): 1434–52.

1. Baumard N, Mascaro O, Chevallier C. Preschoolers are able to take merit into account when distributing goods. Developmental Psychology 2012; 48(2): 492–8.

2. Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM. Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 2003; 425(6955): 297. Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM. Evolution of responses to (un)fairness. Science 214; 346(6207): 314

3. Camerer CF. Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. New York: Russell Sage, 2003.

4. Bridge M, Mark B. Musk: Tesla worker has sabotaged our systems. Times (London). June 20, 2018.

5. Ogbonnaya C, Daniels K, Nielsen K. Does contingent pay encourage positive employee attitudes and intensify work? Human Resource Management Journal 2017; 27(1): 94–112.

6. Combs J, Liu Y, Hall A, Ketchen D. How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology 2006; 59(3): 501–28; Messersmith JG, Patel PC, Lepak DP, Gould-Williams JS. Unlocking the black box: Exploring the link between high-performance work systems and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2011; 96(6): 1105–18; Gittell JH, Seidner R, Wimbush J. A relational model of how high-performance work systems work. Organization Science 2010; 21(2): 490–506; Shin D, Konrad AM. Causality between high-performance work systems and organizational performance. Journal of Management 2017; 43(4): 973–97.

7. Maslow AH. Toward a psychology of being, 2nd ed. Oxford: Van Nostrand; 1968.

8. Ryff CD. Well-being with soul: Science in pursuit of human potential. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2018; 13(2): 242–8; Ryff CD, Singer BH. Know Thyself and Become What you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. In Delle Fave A. (Ed.) The exploration of happiness: present and future perspectives. Happiness Studies Book Series. New York: Springer, 2013: 97–116.

9. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology 2008; 49(3): 182–5; Seligman MEP, Parks AC, Steen T. A balanced psychology and a full life. Philosophical Transactions Biological Sciences 2004; 359(1449): 1379–81.

10. Williams G. Management millennialism: Designing the new generation of employee. Work, Employment and Society 2020; 34(3): 371–87.

11. Sruk B. How millennials are changing organizations and business models: New values, new principles, new culture. Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting 2020; 5(1): 101–8.

12. Lepper MR, Greene D. Turning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children’s intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975; 31(3): 479–86.

13. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press, 2017.

14. Frick BJ, Goetzen UTE, Simmons R. The hidden costs of high-performance work practices: Evidence from a large German steel company. ILR Review 2013; 66(1): 198–224.

15. Kim JH, Gerhart B, Fang M. Do financial incentives help or harm performance in interesting tasks? Journal of applied psychology, September, 2021 (advance on-line publication).

16. Cerasoli CP, Nicklin JM, Ford MT. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2014; 140(4): 980–1008.

17. Byron K, Khazanchi S. Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin 2012; 138(4): 809–30.

18. Park S, Sturman MC. Evaluating form and functionality of pay-for-performance plans: The relative incentive and sorting effects of merit pay, bonuses, and long-term incentives. Human Resource Management 2016; 55(4): 697–719; Pohler D, Schmidt JA. Does pay-for-performance strain the employment relationship? The effect of manager bonus eligibility on nonmanagement employee turnover. Personnel Psychology 2016; 69(2): 395–429.

19. Lazear EP. Performance pay and productivity. American Economic Review 2000; 90(5): 1346–61.

20. Hinds PJ, Carley KM, Krackhardt D, Wholey D. Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2000; 81(2): 226–51; Chiaburu DS, Harrison DA. Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2008; 93(5): 1082–103.

21. Groysberg B, Lee L-E. The effect of colleague quality on top performance: The case of security analysts. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2008; 29(8): 1123–44.

22. Rossman G, Esparza N, Bonacich P. I’d like to thank the academy, team spillovers, and network centrality. American Sociological Review 2010; 75(1): 31–51.

23. Weber B, Hertel G. Motivation gains of inferior group members: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007; 93(6): 973–93.

24. Osborn KA, Irwin BC, Skogsberg NJ, Feltz DL. The Köhler effect: Motivation gains and losses in real sports groups. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology 2012; 1(4): 242–53.

25. Aiello JR, Douthitt EA. Social facilitation from Triplett to electronic performance monitoring. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2001; 5(3): 163–80.

26. Gerhart B, Fang M. Pay for (individual) performance: Issues, claims, evidence and the role of sorting effects. Human Resource Management Review 2014; 24(1): 41–52.

27. Nyberg A. Retaining your high performers: Moderators of the performance–job satisfaction–voluntary turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology 2010; 95(3): 440–53.

28. Tervio M. Superstars and mediocrities: Market failure in the discovery of talent. Review of Economic Studies 2009; 76(2): 829–50.

29. Colquitt JA, Jackson CL. Justice in teams: The context sensitivity of justice rules across individual and team contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2006; 36(4): 868–99.

30. Nederhand M, Tabbers H, Rikers R. Learning to calibrate: Providing standards to improve calibration accuracy for different performance levels. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2019; 33(6): 1068–79.

31. Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999; 77(6): 1121–34.

32. Nederhand et al. Learning to calibrate.

33. Kawall J. On complacency. American Philosophical Quarterly 2006; 43(4): 343–55; Rhodes MG. Metacognition. Teaching of psychology 2019; 46(2): 168–75; McIntosh RD, Fowler EA, Lyu T, Della Sala S. Wise up: Clarifying the role of metacognition in the Dunning-Kruger effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 2019; 148(11): 1882–97.

34. Dunning D, Johnson K, Ehrlinger J, Kruger J. Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2003; 12(3): 83–7.

35. Cappelen C, Dahlberg S. The law of Jante and generalized trust. Acta Sociologica 2018; 61(4): 419–40.

36. Reh S, Tröster C, Van Quaquebeke N. Keeping (future) rivals down: Temporal social comparison predicts coworker social undermining via future status threat and envy. Journal of Applied Psychology 2018; 103(4): 399–415; Campbell EM, Liao H, Chuang A, Zhou J, Dong Y. Hot shots and cool reception? An expanded view of social consequences for high performers. Journal of Applied Psychology 2017; 102(5): 845–66; Kim E, Glomb TM. Get smarty pants: Cognitive ability, personality, and victimization. Journal of Applied Psychology 2010; 95(5): 889–901; Kim E, Glomb TM. Victimization of high performers: The roles of envy and work group identification. Journal of Applied Psychology 2014; 99(4): 619–34; Jensen JM, Patel PC, Raver JL. Is it better to be average? High and low performance as predictors of employee victimization. Journal of Applied Psychology 2014; 99(2): 296–309.

37. Hermanowicz J. The culture of mediocrity. Minerva 2013; 51(3): 363–87.

38. Kim, Glomb. Victimization of high performers.

39. Pieper JR. Uncovering the nuances of referral hiring: How referrer characteristics affect referral hires’ performance and likelihood of voluntary turnover. Personnel Psychology 2015; 68(4): 811–58.

40. Burks SV, Cowgill B, Hoffman M, Housman M. The value of hiring through employee referrals. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2015; 130(2): 805–39; Ekinci E. Employee Referrals as a screening device. RAND Journal of Economics 2016; 47(3): 688–708; Stockman S, Van Hoye G, Carpentier M. The dark side of employee referral bonus programs: Potential applicants’ awareness of a referral bonus and perceptions of organisational attractiveness. Applied Psychology 2017; 66(4): 599–627.

41. Young M. The rise of the meritocracy, 1870–2033. London: Thames & Hudson, 1958; Young M. Interview by Dench G. Looking back on meritocracy. Political Quarterly 2006; 77(s1): 73–77; Chang-Hee K, Yong-Beom C. How meritocracy is defined today? Contemporary aspects of meritocracy. Economics and Sociology 2017; 10(1): 112–21.

42. Gallardo-Gallardo E, Dries N, González-Cruz TF. What is the meaning of “talent” in the world of work? Human Resource Management Review 2013; 23(4): 290–300; Adamsen B. Do we really know what the term “talent” in talent management means? And what could be the consequences of not knowing? Philosophy of Management 2014; 13(3): 3–20.

43. Weber M. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, repr. ed. Translated by Talcott Parsons. With a foreword by RH Tawney. Mineola, NY: Dover, 2003.

44. Christopher AN, Zabel KL, Jones JR, Marek P. Protestant ethic ideology: Its multifaceted relationships with just world beliefs, social dominance orientation, and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences 2008; 45(6): 473–7; Mudrack PE. An outcomes-based approach to just world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences 2005; 38(4): 817–30.

45. Day JW, Holladay CL, Johnson SK, Barron LG. Organizational rewards: Considering employee need in allocation. Personnel Review 2014; 43(1): 74–95.

46. Gilboa S, Shirom A, Fried Y, Cooper C. A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: examining main and moderating effects. Personnel Psychology 2008; 61(2): 227–71.

47. Fuller S, Cooke LP. Workplace variation in fatherhood wage premiums: Do formalization and performance pay matter? Work, Employment and Society 2018; 32(4): 768–88.

48. Deutsch M. Cooperation, competition, and conflict. In Coleman PT, Deutsch M, Marcus EC. (Eds.) The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice, 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2014: 3–28.

49. Ingham AG, Levinger G, Graves J, Peckham V. The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1974; 10(4): 371–84; Simms A, Nichols T. Social loafing: A review of the literature. Journal of Management Policy and Practice 2014; 15(1): 58–67.

50. Adler S, Campion M, Colquitt A, et al. Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2016; 9(2): 219–52; Cappelli P, Tavis A. The performance management revolution. Harvard Business Review 2016; 94(10): 58–67.

51. Feintzeig R. The trouble with grading employees. Management & Careers. Wall Street Journal. April 21, 2015.

52. Cappelli P, Conyon MJ. What do performance appraisals do? ILR Review 2018; 71(1): 88–116.

53. Aguinis H, Bradley KJ. The secret sauce for organizational success: Managing and producing star performers. Organizational Dynamics 2015; 44(3): 161–8; Aguinis H, O’Boyle E, Gonzalez‐Mulé E, Joo H. Cumulative advantage: Conductors and insulators of heavy-tailed productivity distributions and productivity stars. Personnel Psychology 2016; 69(1): 3–66; Joo H, Aguinis H, Bradley KJ. Not all nonnormal distributions are created equal: Improved theoretical and measurement precision. Journal of Applied Psychology 2017; 102(7): 1022–53.

54. Green BG, Dalton P, Cowart B, Shaffer G. Evaluating the “labeled magnitude scale” for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chemical Senses 1996; 21(3): 323–34; Green BG. Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties. Chemical Senses 1993; 18(6): 683–702.

55. Haines VY, St-Onge S. Performance management effectiveness: Practices or context? International Journal of Human Resource Management 2012; 23(6): 1158–75.

56. Gorman CA, Rentsch JR. Evaluating frame-of-reference rater training effectiveness using performance schema accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009; 94(5): 1336–44; DeNisi AS, Murphy KR. Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology 2017; 102(3): 421–33; MacDonald HA, Sulsky LM. Rating formats and rater training redux: A context-specific approach for enhancing the effectiveness of performance management. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 2009; 41(4): 227–40.

57. Bradler C, Dur R, Neckermann S, Non A. Employee recognition and performance: A field experiment. Management Science 2016; 62(11): 3085–99; Neckermann S, Yang X. Understanding the (unexpected) consequences of unexpected recognition. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2017; 135: 131–42.

58. Li N, Zheng X, Harris TB, Liu X, Kirkman BL. Recognizing “me” benefits “we”: Investigating the positive spillover effects of formal individual recognition in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology 2016; 101(7): 925–39.

59. Heidemeier H, Moser K. Self–other agreement in job performance ratings: A meta-analytic test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009; 94(2): 353–70.

60. Kim KY, Atwater L, Patel PC, Smither JW. Multisource feedback, human capital, and the financial performance of organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 2016; 101(11): 1569–84.

61. Evans TR, Dobrosielska A. Feedback-seeking culture moderates the relationship between positive feedback and task performance. Current Psychology 2019; 40(7): 3401–8.

62. Lee WR, Choi SB, Kang S-W. How leaders’ positive feedback influences employees’ innovative behavior: the mediating role of voice behavior and job autonomy. Sustainability 2021; 13(4): 1901.

63. DeLong TJ, Vijayaraghavan V. Let’s hear it for B players. Harvard Business Review 2003; 81(6): 96–102.

64. King WC, Miles EW, Day DD. A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior 1993; 14(4): 301–17.

65. Gilley JW, Gilley AM, Jackson SA, Lawrence H. Managerial practices and organizational conditions that encourage employee growth and development. Performance Improvement Quarterly 2015; 28(3): 71–93; Gilley A, Gilley JW, Ambort-Clark KA, Marion D. Evidence of managerial malpractice: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship 2014; 19(4): 24–42.

1. Janicijevic N. business processes in organizational diagnosis. Management 2010; 15(2): 85–106.

2. Uhl-Bien M. Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly 2006; 17(6): 654–76; Barge JK. Pivotal leadership and the art of conversation. Leadership 2014; 10(1): 56–78.

3. Deal TE, Kennedy AA. Corporate cultures: the rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1982; Ouchi WG. Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1982; Peters TJ, Waterman RH. In Search of Excellence: lessons from America's best-run companies. New York: Warner, 1982; Porras, Collins. Built to Last: Successful habits of visionary companies. London: Random House, 2000; Tan B-S. In search of the link between organizational culture and performance: A review from the conclusion validity perspective. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 2019; 40(3): 356–68.

4. Levering R. The 100 best companies to work for. Fortune 2016; 173(4): 142–165.

5. Harvey CR, Graham J, Grennan J, Rajgopal S. Corporate culture: Evidence from the field. National Bureau of Economic Research Paper, 2017.

6. O’Reilly CA, Chatman J, Caldwell DF. People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal 1991; 34(3): 487–516.

7. Eric Van den S. Culture clash: The costs and benefits of homogeneity. Management Science 2010; 56(10): 1718–38.

8. Anonymous. The caring company: Corporate culture and performance by John Kotter and James Heskett. The Economist. June 1992.

9. Sackmann SA. Culture and performance. In Ashkanasy NM, Wilderom CPM, and Peterson, MF. (Eds.) The handbook of organizational culture and climate. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2011: 188–224.

10. O’Reilly CA, Caldwell DF, Chatman JA, Doerr B. The promise and problems of organizational culture: CEO personality, culture, and firm performance. Group and Organization Management 2014; 39(6): 595–625.

11. Schneider WE. Productivity improvement through cultural focus. Consulting Psychology Journal 1995; 47(1): 3–27; Denison DR, Mishra AK. Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science 1995; 6(2): 204–23.

12. Mushtaq AL. Organizational culture in the hotel industry: Perceptions and preferences among staff. Advances in Management 2013; 6(5): 55–60.

13. Warrick DD. What leaders need to know about organizational culture. Business Horizons 2017; 60(3): 395–404.

14. Klein AS, Wallis J, Cooke RA. The impact of leadership styles on organizational culture and firm effectiveness: An empirical study. Journal of Management and Organization 2013; 19(3): 241–54; Giberson TR, Resick CJ, Dickson MW, Mitchelson JK, Randall KR, Clark MA. Leadership and organizational culture: Linking CEO characteristics to cultural values. Journal of Business and Psychology 2009; 24(2): 123–37.

15. Block L. The leadership-culture connection: an exploratory investigation. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 2003; 24(6): 318–34; Tsai Y. Relationship between organizational culture, leadership behavior and job satisfaction. BMC Health Services Research 2011; 11(1): 98–106.

16. Gibbons R, LiCalzi M, Warglien M. What situation is this? shared frames and collective performance. Strategy scien$ce 2021; 6(2): 124–40.

17. Christensen CM, Alton R, Rising C, Waldeck A. The new M&A playbook. Harvard Business Review. March 2011.

18. Selling Chrysler: Putting the shine back on. The Economist. May 14, 2007.

19. Steigenberger N. The challenge of integration: A review of the M&A integration literature. International Journal of Management Reviews 2017; 19(4): 408–31; Monin P, Noorderhaven N, Vaara E, Kroon D. Giving sense to and making sense of justice in postmerger integration. Academy of Management journal 2013; 56(1): 256–84.

20. Schat ACH, Frone MR. Exposure to psychological aggression at work and job performance: The mediating role of job attitudes and personal health. Work and Stress 2011; 25(1): 23–40; Caza BB, Cortina LM. From insult to injury: Explaining the impact of incivility. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2007; 29(4): 335–50.

21. Riskin A, Erez A, Foulk TA, et al. The impact of rudeness on medical team performance: A randomized trial. Pediatrics 2015; 136(3): 487–95.

22. Shin Y, Hur W-M. Supervisor incivility and employee job performance: The mediating roles of job insecurity and amotivation. Journal of Psychology 2019; 154(1): 38–59; Priesemuth M, Schminke M, Ambrose ML, Folger R. Abusive supervision climate: A multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 2014; 57(5): 1513–34.

23. Edmondson AC, Lei Z. Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 2014; 1(1): 23–43; Newman A, Donohue R, Eva N. Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review 2017; 27(3): 521–35.

24. Kim S, Lee H, Connerton TP. How psychological safety affects team performance: Mediating role of efficacy and learning behavior. Frontiers in Psychology 2020; 11: 1581; Nellen LC, Gijselaers WH, Grohnert T. A meta-analytic literature review on organization-level drivers of team learning. Human Resource Development Review 2019; 19(2): 152–82; Hennel P, Rosenkranz C. Investigating the “socio” in socio-technical development: The case for psychological safety in agile information systems development. Project Management Journal 2020; 52(1): 11–30.

25. Wang H-j, Lu C-q, Siu O-l. Job insecurity and job performance: The moderating role of organizational justice and the mediating role of work engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology 2015; 100(4): 1249–58; Abolade DA. Impact of employees’ job insecurity and employee turnover on organisational performance in private and public sector organisations. Studies in Business and Economics 2018; 13(2): 5–19.

26. Foulk T, Woolum A, Erez A. Catching rudeness is like catching a cold: The contagion effects of low-intensity negative behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology 2016; 101(1): 50–67.

27. Lim S, Cortina LM, Magley VJ. Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology 2008; 93(1): 95–107; Porath CL, Erez A. Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Academy of Management Journal 2007; 50(5): 1181–97.

28. Farh CIC, Chen Z. Beyond the individual victim: Multilevel consequences of abusive supervision in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology 2014; 99(6): 1074–95.

29. Andersson LM, Pearson CM. Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review 1999; 24(3): 452–71; Tepper BJ. Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management 2007; 33(3): 261–89.

30. LeBreton JM, Shiverdecker LK, Grimaldi EM. The dark triad and workplace behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 2018; 5(1): 387–414; Paulhus DL, Buckels EE, Trapnell PD, Jones DN. Screening for dark personalities: The short dark tetrad (SD4). European Journal of Psychological Assessment 2021; 37(3): 208–22.

31. Palmer JC, Holmes RM, Perrewé PL. The cascading effects of CEO dark triad personality on subordinate behavior and firm performance: A multilevel theoretical model. Group and Organization Management 2020; 45(2): 143–80.

32. Youssef CM, Luthans F. Positive organizational behavior in the workplace: The impact of hope, optimism, and resilience. Journal of Management 2007; 33(5): 774–800; Avey JB, Reichard RJ, Luthans F, Mhatre KH. Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly 2011; 22(2): 127–52.

33. Otake K, Shimai S, Tanaka-Matsumi J, Otsui K, Fredrickson BL. Happy people become happier through kindness: A counting kindnesses intervention. Journal of Happiness Studies 2006; 7(3): 361–75; Thielmann I, Hilbig BE. The traits one can trust: Dissecting reciprocity and kindness as determinants of trustworthy behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2015; 41(11): 1523–36.

34. Fredrickson BL. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. In Csikszentmihalyi M, Csikszentmihalyi IS. (Eds.) A life worth living: Contributions to positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006: 85–103.

35. Gerbasi A, Porath CL, Parker A, Spreitzer G, Cross R. Destructive de-energizing relationships: How thriving buffers their effect on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2015; 100(5): 1423–33; Kleine AK, Rudolph CW, Zacher H. Thriving at work: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2019; 40(9–10): 973–99.

36. Baker WF, O’Malley M. Leading with kindness: How good people consistently get superior results. Saranac Lake, NY: American Management Association, 2008.

37. Mallén F, Domínguez-Escrig E, Lapiedra R, Chiva R. Does leader humility matter? Effects on altruism and innovation. Management Decision 2019; 58(5): 967–81; Rego A, Cunha MPe, Simpson AV. The perceived impact of leaders’ humility on team effectiveness: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics 2016; 148(1): 205–18.

38. Lee Y, Berry CM, Gonzalez-Mulé E. The importance of being humble: A meta-analysis and incremental validity: Analysis of the relationship between honesty-humility and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2019; 104(12): 1535–46.

39. Frieder RE, Wang G, Oh I-S. Linking job-relevant personality traits, transformational leadership, and job performance via perceived meaningfulness at work: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology 2018; 103(3): 324–33.

40. McCrae RR, Costa PT. Discriminant validity of NEO-PIR facet scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2016; 52(1): 229–37; Derue DS, Nahrgang JD, Wellman NED, Humphrey SE. Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology 2011; 64(1): 7–52.

41. Cunliffe AL, Eriksen M. Relational leadership. Human Relations 2011; 64(11): 1425–49.

42. Hawkins B. Ship-shape: Materializing leadership in the British Royal Navy. Human Relations 2015; 68(6): 951–71; Allen S. Exploring Quaker organising to consider the possibilities for relational leadership. Quaker Studies 2019; 24(2): 249–69.

43. Weitz M. Open concepts. Revue Internationale De Philosophie 1972; 26(99/100 (1/2)): 86–110.

44. Ma L, van Brakel J. Revisiting Wittgenstein on family resemblance and Colour(s). Philosophical Investigations 2016; 39(3): 254–80.

45. Dutton D. A naturalist definition of art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 2006; 64(3): 367–77; Bond EJ. The essential nature of art. American Philosophical Quarterly 1975; 12(2): 177–83.

46. Weber M. Economy and society: A new translation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2019.

47. Tskhay KO, Zhu R, Zou C, Rule NO. Charisma in everyday life: Conceptualization and validation of the general charisma inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2018; 114(1): 131–52.

48. Rogoza R, Fatfouta R. Decoding the narcissism-charisma link: A facet approach. Personality and Individual Differences 2020; 156: 109774.

49. Vergauwe J, Wille B, Hofmans J, Kaiser RB, De Fruyt F. The double-edged sword of leader charisma: Understanding the curvilinear relationship between charismatic personality and leader effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2018; 114(1): 110–30.

50. Caspi A, Bogler R, Tzuman O. “Judging a book by its cover”: The dominance of delivery over content when perceiving charisma. Group and Organization Management 2019; 44(6): 1067–98.

51. The grinch that sold charisma. Bartleby. Economist 2019; 430(9136): 67.

52. Bass BM. Leadership: Good, better, best. Organizational Dynamics 1985; 13(3): 26–40.

53. Vandenberghe C, Stordeur S, D’Hoore W. Transactional and transformational leadership in nursing: Structural validity and substantive relationships. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 2002; 18(1): 16–29.

54. Kahn WA. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal 1990; 33(4): 692–724.

55. Gottman JM. What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hove, England: Psychology Press 1993.

56. Fredrickson BL. Updated thinking on positivity ratios. American Psychologist 2013; 68(9): 814–22; Palgi Y, Bodner E, Shrira A. Positivity ratio of flourishing individuals: Examining the moderation effects of methodological variations and chronological age. Journal of Positive Psychology 2016; 11(2): 109–23; Schutte NS. The broaden and build process: Positive affect, ratio of positive to negative affect and general self-efficacy. Journal of Positive Psychology 2014; 9(1): 66–74; Moroń M. Perceived emotional intelligence and life satisfaction: the mediating role of the positivity ratio. Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2018; 6(3): 212–23.

57. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD. Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 2001; 5(4): 323–70.

58. Silvia PJ, Duval TS. Objective self-awareness theory: Recent progress and enduring problems. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2001; 5(3): 230–41.

59. Bateson M, Nettle D, Roberts G. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters 2006; 2(3): 412–4; Pfattheicher S, Keller J. The watching eyes phenomenon: The role of a sense of being seen and public self‐awareness. European Journal of Social Psychology 2015; 45(5): 560–6.

60. Smith JK. Art as mirror: Creativity and communication in aesthetics. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2014; 8(1): 110–8.

61. Romanowska J, Larsson G, Theorell T. An art-based leadership intervention for enhancement of self-awareness, humility, and leader performance. Journal of Personnel Psychology 2014; 13(2): 97–106.

62. Rousseau DM. Normative beliefs in fund-raising organizations: Linking culture to organizational performance and individual responses. Group and Organization Management 1990; 15(4): 448–60.

63. Arieli S, Sagiv L, Roccas S. Values at work: The impact of personal values in organisations. Applied Psychology 2020; 69(2): 230–75; Rokeach M. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press 1973.

64. Giberson et al. Leadership and organizational culture; Ralston DA, Russell CJ, Egri CP. Business values dimensions: A cross-culturally developed measure of workforce values. International Business Review 2018; 27(6): 1189–99.

65. Hald EJ, Gillespie A, Reader TW. Causal and corrective organisational culture: A systematic review of case studies of institutional failure. Journal of Business Ethics September 2020: 1–27.

66. Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L. The value of corporate culture. Journal of Financial Economics 2015; 117(1): 60–76.

67. Hodson R, Roscigno VJ, Lopez SH. Chaos and the abuse of power: Workplace bullying in organizational and interactional context. Work and Occupations 2006 33(4), 382–416; Roscigno VJ, Lopez SH, Hodson R. Supervisory bullying, status inequalities and organizational context. Social Forces 2009; 87(3): 1561–89.

68. Zimbardo PG. The pathology of imprisonment. Down to earth sociology: Introductory readings. New York: Free Press, 2001.

69. Castro SA, Zautra AJ. Humanization of social relations: Nourishing health and resilience through greater humanity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 2016; 36(2): 64–80.

70. Postmes T, Spears R. Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1998; 123(3): 238–59.

71. Keltner D. Don’t let power corrupt you. Harvard Business Review 2016; 94(10): 112–5.

72. Formanowicz M, Goldenberg A, Saguy T, Pietraszkiewicz A, Walker M, Gross JJ. Understanding dehumanization: The role of agency and communion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2018; 77: 102–16; Tuckey MR, Dollard MF, Hosking PJ, Winefield AH. Workplace bullying: The role of psychosocial work environment factors. International Journal of Stress Management 2009; 16(3): 215–32.