Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.
Warren Buffet
Chapter 5 extends the valuation framework presented in Chapter 4 to return analysis. The metrics presented in Chapter 3 are often referred to as parametric because they represent a set of measurable factors that define a fixed-income security and may be classified as either valuation measures related to the price or risk of a fixed-income security.
Individually, neither the valuation measures nor the risk measures provide a sense of the expected return of a fixed-income security. Return analysis combines both the valuation and risk measures to inform the investor of a fixed-income investment's potential return profile given her expectation of the future evolution of interest rates.
At first blush, one may argue that return analysis is not pertinent to the buy-and-hold investor since the investment horizon is equal to the maturity of the bond, which is not the case for the following reasons:
Aside from the buy-and-hold strategy discussed above, return strategies may be classified in one of two ways [Waring and Siegel 2006]:
The above descriptions illustrate that the differences between a buy and hold, total return, and absolute return investor are those of the investment time horizon and/or the direction of the position taken by the investor (i.e., long or short). Both the buy-and-hold and total-return investors are by definition long only investors. The difference between these two investors is their investment time horizons. Specifically, a total return investor typically has a shorter horizon than that of the buy-and-hold investor. The absolute return investor differs from the total investor only in the sense that she may take a short position against a long position in an attempt to capture alpha. Conversely, the total return investor is long only, seeking to create alpha against a specific performance benchmark.
There are three components to the return realized by the fixed-income investor:
The following example illustrates the buy-and-hold return analysis, the simplest of the three return strategies discussed above. Consider a 3.0% five-year bond priced at par to yield 3.0% to maturity. To understand how the coupon and reinvestment income components contribute to the investor's total return, Table 5.2 presents a return matrix. The return matrix allows for the systematic calculation of the investor's horizon total return. The assumptions used in the return analysis matrix are:
The investor receives coupon income, which is calculated by multiplying the bond's coupon by the principal balance outstanding at the time of the last payment date. The coupon accrues according to the bond basis that is one of the following:
Table 5.1 shows the timing of the investor's expected coupon income. In this case, she expects to earn $150 of coupon income over her anticipated holding period.
Table 5.1 Return Matrix Input—Coupon Income
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Total |
$15 | $15 | $15 | $15 | $15 | $15 | $15 | $15 | $15 | $15 | |
Coupon Income | $150 |
Table 5.2 Return Matrix: Coupon Income plus Reinvestment
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
$15 | $15.04 | $15.08 | $15.11 | $15.15 | $15.19 | $15.22 | $15.26 | $15.30 | $15.34 |
$15 | $15.04 | $15.08 | $15.11 | $15.15 | $15.19 | $15.22 | $15.26 | $15.30 | |
$15 | $15.04 | $15.08 | $15.11 | $15.15 | $15.19 | $15.22 | $15.26 | ||
$15 | $15.04 | $15.08 | $15.11 | $15.15 | $15.19 | $15.22 | |||
$15 | $15.04 | $15.08 | $15.11 | $15.15 | $15.19 | ||||
$15 | $15.04 | $15.08 | $15.11 | $15.15 | |||||
$15 | $15.04 | $15.08 | $15.11 | ||||||
$15 | $15.04 | $15.08 | |||||||
$15 | $15.04 | ||||||||
$1,015.00 | |||||||||
Total Coupon ![]() |
$151.70 | ||||||||
Coupon Income | $150.00 | ||||||||
Reinvestment Income | $1.70 | ||||||||
Return of Principal | $1,000.00 | ||||||||
Total Return | $1,151.70 |
The investor's annualized return is given by the following:
where: ![]() |
= | Number of periods |
Frequency | = | Payment frequency of the bond |
The investor's annualized return in this example above is:
Unlike the case of the buy-and-hold investor, the total or absolute return investor may sell her bond investment prior to maturity. In the case of either the total or absolute return investor, the holding period is generally shorter than the maturity of the bond. Indeed, even a buy-and-hold investor may be required to sell her investment in order to raise cash to meet an unexpected out flow from the portfolio. As a result, a price change that is due to a change in the yield maturity as well as a shorter time maturity, due to the passage of time, affects her realized holding period return.
The price change is given by the following:
where: ![]() |
= | Horizon price |
![]() |
= | Initial investment price |
Revisting equation (3.11):
the modified duration of a five-year, 3.0% bond is 4.61 and its convexity is 12.95. Thus, given an instantaneous (+/−) 100 bps change in the term structure the expected price change of a 3.0% five-year bond priced at $100 is 4.74%.
The duration and convexity profile of a bond indicate the bond's price risk given a change in the term structure. However, that profile does not indicate the return an investor may expect to realize, given a holding period that is shorter than the bond's maturity date.
The return analysis presented in this section continues with the hypothetical yield curve used in Chapter 3 and is presented again in Table 5.3. Given an investment horizon that is less than the time to maturity of the bond, the expected return is calculated using equation 5.1.
Table 5.3 Hypothetical Swap Rate Curve
Tenor | 1-yr. | 2-yr. | 3-yr. | 5-yr. | 10-yr. | 20-yr. | 30-yr. |
1.00% | 1.50% | 1.75% | 2.15% | 3.00% | 3.60% | 3.75% |
The assumptions used are:
Two years forward, assuming both the swap curve and nominal spreads are unchanged the price of the bond is $101.72875. The pricing inputs are:
What is the investor's realized return? From Table 5.2, the coupon income plus reinvestment (two years) is equal to $60.23. The price of the bond increased $101.72875. The investor's proceeds from the sale of the bond after two years is equal to $1,017.2875 plus the coupon and reinvestment income, totaling $1,077.517.
From equation 5.1 the investor's annualized return given a two-year holding period assuming that the swap curve remains unchanged is:
Given a two-year horizon, the investor's realized annual return is more than that which would have been achieved under the buy-and-hold strategy due to the following:
The metrics used to describe the risk of the bond also changed at the two-year horizon. The duration and convexity of the bond at the end of the two-year horizon are 2.86 and 5.46, respectively. Substituting the change in the yield to maturity, the horizon duration, and the horizon convexity into equation 3.11 yields a predicted price change:
Using the risk measures of duration and convexity observed at the end of the two-year investment horizon and given the swap curve presented in Table 5.3 the estimated change price is 1.735%, close to the observed price change of the bond at the end of the two-year horizon.
Together, the measures that define the price of a bond and those that define the risk of a bond can be used to estimate the return of a bond given an investment horizon, a horizon yield to maturity, and the horizon duration and convexity.
The estimated return is calculated by using equation 1.5 and assuming a annual reinvestment rate of 25 basis points as illustrated in Table 5.2. The return attributable to both coupon and reinvestment income is:
In the above example, the investor received a three-payment annuity of $15 and a final payment at the horizon date of $15. The total coupon income plus reinvestment income received by the investor at the end of the two year horizon is $60.09. The estimated price change at the end of the two-year horizon assuming the swap curve presented in Table 5.1 is given by the following:
The investor's holding period return is 7.74%. The investor's estimated annualized return is 3.76%. The example above illustrates an important point; individually the measures that define price or risk tell the investor little about the expected return of a fixed-income security. However, together they provide the investor with some insight regarding the expected return over a given investment horizon. Return analysis examines each of the three components of total return presented in section 5.2.
Return analysis blends the measures that define both the price and risk of a bond to provide the investor with an understanding of its expected return given the following inputs:
Return analysis allows the investor irrespective of her strategy (buy and hold, total return, or absolute return) to assess the return potential of a fixed-income security. Indeed, using this analysis she is able to select a portfolio that meets her unique risk/reward profile regardless of the strategy that she chooses.