Chapter 14
EXTREME TURBULENCE IN PUNJAB
Karl Marx had once said: ‘Religion is the opiate of the masses.’ In the dying decades of the twentieth century, religion became the breeding ground of extremism and separatist terrorism in Punjab. The situation reminded me of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche’s words: ‘After coming into contact with a religious man I always feel I must wash my hands.’
***
The period 1979 to 1991 was a crucial one in my professional career. I was then a special correspondent of the Indian Express when Punjab was in the vice-like grip of foreign-backed separatist terrorism and when Akali politics was in turmoil.
A few years before the Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale-led terrorist violence in Punjab assumed serious proportions, efforts were initiated to resolve the interstate disputes between Punjab and Haryana. (Bhindranwale began as a Sikh preacher who, along with his followers, later took control of the Golden Temple Complex at Amritsar: the holiest shrine of the Sikhs. He started fortifying the complex after he was forced to move from the Guru Nanak Niwas to the Akal Takht on 15 December 1983.)
Leaders of different factions of the Akali Dal as well as some Congress and non-Congress leaders, including Chandrashekhar1 and Inder Kumar Gujral,2 acted as mediators and tried to resolve the disputes, but without much success.
In early February 1983, before the tripartite talks – among the Centre, the Akalis and the leaders of the opposition parties – could commence, a secret meeting was arranged at a Congress leader’s farm house near Delhi. Those present were Arun Singh,3 Captain Amarinder Singh4 and the Akali leaders Ravi Inder Singh and Balwant Singh. After five minutes of their arrival, Rajiv Gandhi (then a Congress MP) also turned up. No clear picture, however, emerged on how to find a solution to Punjab’s complex situation.
Given the fact that a secret meeting had taken place, nobody was surprised when the first tripartite meeting held later (in late February 1983) among the Centre, the Akalis and the leaders of the opposition parties ended in a deadlock. A number of formulae were suggested but without any viable outcome.
The Central leadership was apparently not interested in finding immediate solutions to Punjab’s problems at the time of the tripartite talks. The contention was that the Akalis were frequently shifting their stand on their demands and that no solution could be evolved at the cost of Haryana and Rajasthan. At one stage, Indira Gandhi told Chandrashekhar that the Akalis had refused to come to Delhi to hold talks with her. Factional divisions within the Akali Dal and the Centre’s inability to concede some of the Akalis’ demands led to the failure of these efforts. These developments made Punjab’s complex problem even more difficult to resolve.
***
The first five decades of Punjab’s post-independence history have been marked by two tragic phases. The first phase saw the Hindu—Sikh divide caused by the Master Tara Singh-led agitation for the formation of the Punjabi Suba and an equally aggressive opposition to it by some right-wing Hindu organizations. The second was the more-than-a-decade-long period that witnessed militancy and separatist terrorism.
As mentioned in Chapter 1, in the early 1950s, Master Tara Singh launched the Punjabi Suba movement demanding a Sikh-majority state within the framework of the Indian Constitution. The undeclared object was to have a state where the Akalis, claiming to be the ‘sole representatives of the Sikhs’, could come to power. Such a state, however, did not come into existence in the then-prevailing situation. But the demand for a Sikh-majority state sowed the seeds of separatism, which nourished by the fundamentalists and religious extremists and later backed by Pakistan, sprouted (in the 1980s) in the form of a demand for ‘Khalistan’ – a separate country for the Sikhs. It needs to be borne in mind that such a demand was not made by the 1973 Anandpur Sahib Resolution of the Akali Dal leadership, then made up of moderates. (Anandpur Sahib is a place in Punjab’s Ropar district.)
The Anandpur Sahib Resolution – drafted by the Akali Dal’s high-level subcommittee headed by the party general secretary, Surjit Singh Barnala – was adopted at the open session of the 18th All India Akali Conference held at Ludhiana on 28-29 October 1978. The operative part of the resolution read as follows: ‘The Akali Dal endorses the principle of State autonomy in keeping with the concept of Federalism.’
While releasing the English version of the resolution, the Akali Dal president, Harchand Singh Longowal, had said: ‘There has been much confusion and misunderstanding about the text of the resolution adopted by the Working Committee of the Akali Dal at Anandpur Sahib. The Akali Dal has been consistently making efforts to clear the spirit and the content of the resolution. Now an authentic version is being issued for the benefit of non-Punjabi countrymen.’
***
The Hindu—Sikh chasm created by the Punjabi Suba movement and by the extremists in the late 1970s, 1980s and the early 1990s was, however, substantially bridged after the Akali Dal opened up its membership for non-Sikhs in 1996, leading to what the Akali Dal supremo Parkash Singh Badal described a ‘lifelong’ alliance between his party and the BJP. The alliance helped the two parties to capture power in Punjab in the 1997, 2007 and 2012 Assembly elections (details given later).
In the second phase starting in the late 1970s, Punjab saw the emergence of the Bhindranwale phenomenon, the spread of religious extremism and the spate of terrorist violence, which killed thousands of innocent Hindus and Sikhs. Such extremism and violence, abetted by Pakistan, were, in fact, the illegitimate offspring of the Akali Dal—Congress tussle for power, as was clear from the subsequent happenings in Punjab.
The second phase also witnessed three tragic events: Indira Gandhi’s assassination on 31 October 1984; the November 1984 anti-Sikh riots; and Beant Singh’s (chief minister of Punjab) assassination on 31 August 1995 (details given later).
A group belonging to fundamentalist organizations, including the Damdami Taksal, to which Bhindranwale belonged, held a demonstration against the congregation of the Sikh sect (called Nirankaris) in Amritsar on 13 April 1978, the day of the Baisakhi festival. It led to a confrontation in which 16 demonstrators were killed. This marked the starting point of the tragic events in Punjab, where the Parkash Singh Badal-led Akali Government was in power at that time. The killing of fundamentalist Sikhs had their climax in the assassination of Baba Gurbachan Singh, the spiritual head of the Nirankaris, on 24 April 1980 in Delhi. Thereafter, religious dogmatism and extremism created the environment that resulted in the emergence of the Bhindranwale spectre.
Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale’s is the tragic and frightening story of how certain Congress and Akali Dal leaders tried to use rabid fundamentalist and extremist elements in their fight for power at the cost of Punjab’s peace and political stability. Such a state of affairs created a fertile ground for inimical foreign forces that later supported Bhindranwale in their abortive bid to disintegrate India.
***
It all began with Giani Zail Singh promoting Sikh fundamentalists to weaken the Akalis.
In mid-August 1978 (when Zail Singh was out of power), the Dal Khalsa, then an obscure fundamentalist body, held a press conference in a Sector 22 Chandigarh hotel, where I was also present. It was addressed by the Dal Khalsa chief, Gajinder Singh. The bill for the conference was paid by none other than Onkar Chand (whom we have met earlier in Chapter 13), Zail Singh’s right-hand man and once secretary of the Punjab Congress Bhawan Trust.
The pro-Khalistani Gajinder Singh (who was among the hijackers of an Indian Airlines plane to Lahore, Pakistan, on 29 September 1981), was named ‘minister for agriculture’ in the clandestine government that was formed by the West Germany-based Dal Khalsa’s mukh panch (chief) on 11 June 1984.
In early 1980, even as efforts were on to resolve Punjab and Haryana’s interstate issues through talks, Congress leaders, including Giani Zail Singh and Sanjay Gandhi, are believed to have propped up the then relatively young and obscure fundamentalist preacher Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale who reportedly also supported some Congress candidates in the elections. It did not take him long to turn into a Frankenstein to haunt his creators. The USA’s Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) later used him as a pawn for promoting their strategic interests in the region.
The fifth volume of the series entitled A Centenary History of the Indian National Congress (Academic Foundation, Delhi, 2011) also made critical observations about the role Giani Zail Singh played, first when he was Punjab chief minister (1972–77) and then as Union home minister (in 1980), in promoting religious extremists and terrorist elements in Punjab.
The volume concluded that ‘dirty politics’ in the name of religion in Punjab was one of the factors responsible for instigating terrorism and the Khalistan agitation in Punjab. Such dubious measures boomeranged on both the Akali and Congress leaderships with disastrous consequences for the Sikh community and the Indian state.
After the media highlighted the critical comments in the book against Zail Singh and Sanjay Gandhi, the Congress distanced itself from such comments, contending that this was not the official version of the party’s history.
Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari (who took over as minister of state, information and broadcasting, on 28 October 2012), stressed that ‘the book, brought out by a group of editors, headed by senior party leader Pranab Mukherjee, has two disclaimers [one is] “In no circumstances, Congress subscribes to these views”’. (Pranab Mukherjee went on to become the president of India on 25 July 2012.)
In the preface, Mukherjee has noted that the Congress desired the volume ‘to be edited and contributed [sic] by experts in order to generate an “objective and scholarly perspective for the period under review” and “not necessarily have a party perspective”’.
***
After Sanjay Gandhi’s death (he was killed in a plane crash in Delhi on 23 June 1980) and Zail Singh’s elevation as Union home minister in January 1980, the attempts to build up Bhindranwale continued. This was evident from two incidents.
First, at a press conference (in late 1980) during his visit to Chandigarh (where I was also present), Rajiv Gandhi described Bhindranwale as a ‘sant’ (saint). Secondly, Zail Singh even prevented Bhindranwale from being arrested by the Punjab police (details given later in this chapter) in connection with the murder of Lala Jagat Narain (on 9 September 1981 near Ludhiana), veteran journalist and owner and chief editor of the Hind Samachar Group of newspapers (publishers of the state’s three popular language dailies).
The relations between Zail Singh and Darbara Singh – chief minister of Punjab from June 1980 to October 1983, who belonged to the Congress – were far from cordial, which led to anomalous situations.
In a talk with me (in the second week of September 1981), Darbara Singh bemoaned the fact that two leaders (Zail Singh and Bhajan Lal, chief minister of Haryana) had created obstacles for the Punjab police, which had gone to Haryana to nab Bhindranwale.
The aforementioned book (A Centenary History of the Indian National Congress) also has referred to the episode involving the questionable role of Gianiji.
Zail Singh and Bhindranwale had Haryana connections as well. Gianiji had ensured a safe passage for Bhindranwale who had set up camp at village Chando Kalan in the Hisar district of Haryana for addressing religious congregations.
The Punjab Police had obtained arrest warrants for Bhindranwale in connection with the assassination of Lala Jagat Narain. My sources described the roles of Zail Singh and Bhajan Lal in saving Bhindranwale from being arrested by the Punjab police in September 1981 in the following words:
A few days after the assassination, a police party from Punjab, led by the Ludhiana district police chief and assisted by a Haryana police team, had laid a perfect trap for Bhindranwale, but Zail Singh intervened. He questioned Haryana Chief Minister Bhajan Lal: ‘Why are you taking the trouble of Darbara Singh on your shoulders?’
Acting on Zail Singh’s advice, Bhajan Lal sent a senior official to inform Bhindranwale about the plan to nab him. Bhindranwale then fled from Chando Kalan under the protection of the Haryana Police. Travelling incognito in a police officer’s car, he reached Chowk Mehta – the headquarters of the Damdami Taksal [situated about 40 km north of Amritsar] – even as the Punjab police (which had gone to Chando Kalan) returned empty handed.
On 20 September 1981, Bhindranwale surrendered to the police at Chowk Mehta. His arrest led to the killing of about a score of Sikh protestors in clashes with the police. He was released on bail on 15 October 1981, even as Union Home Minister Giani Zail Singh announced in Parliament that there was no evidence against Bhindranwale.
***
Disregarding the consequences for the Indian polity and its secular character, Zail Singh believed that by using the Akalis’ panthic (religious) agenda and by promoting religious extremism, the Congress could politically defeat the Akalis. Otherwise a skilful political operator, Gianiji probably had forgotten that in the use of the ‘religion-and-politics-are-inseparable ideology’, the Akalis could always outmanoeuvre the Congress.
***
As the militants’ activities spread across Punjab, some Akali leaders (considered moderate) too started toeing the extremist line. They organized morchas (rallies) on a variety of issues, thereby creating chaos and uncertainty. Such an atmosphere proved conducive for the further spread of militancy, resulting in large-scale violence and huge casualty figures.
Deeply upset over the deteriorating situation in Punjab, Parliament passed a resolution on 29 April 1982:
Resolved that this House expresses its deep anguish and concern over the situation recently created in the Punjab and strongly condemns certain calculated acts of sacrilege committed by some miscreants and fanatical elements in Amritsar, aimed at creating disharmony, disorder and misunderstanding among the patriotic and peace-loving people of the state. The House reaffirms its commitment to the national policy of secularism, tolerance and amity among all sections of the Indian citizens, and trusts that the people of Punjab will not allow themselves to be swayed by any mischievous and irresponsible actions of a few misguided and anti-national persons. This House reiterates that the law shall take its course to bring the culprits to book speedily and trusts that all communities and every section of public opinion in Punjab will strive to maintain the traditional communal harmony, goodwill and peace and continue to work together for the greater good of the state and our country.
Even the Parliament resolution (stressing on the need for maintaining communal harmony and peace in Punjab) did not make any impact on some of the Akali leaders, who continued to encourage the extremist elements.
***
In July 1982, Sant Harchand Singh Longowal (the chief of the Akali Dal) invited Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale to take up residence within the Golden Temple compound at Amritsar. He praised the ‘tough-minded’ Bhindranwale for helping the Akalis ‘to beat the government’. Demanding recognition of Sikhs as a separate entity, the Akali Dal wanted an amendment to Article 25 of the Indian Constitution, which treats Sikhism, Jainism and Buddhism as part of the Hindu religion.
In late February 1984, some Akali leaders, including Parkash Singh Badal, even burnt copies of Article 25 in Delhi’s Bangla Sahib Gurdwara. Years later, the Anand Marriage Act was amended (in 2012) for the separate registration of Sikh marriages. The Akalis, however, continued to voice their demand for an amendment to Article 25.
After the arrest of the president of the All India Sikh Students’ Federation, Amrik Singh (an ally of the militants), on 19 July 1982, in a case of attempted murder, Bhindranwale shifted from Chowk Mehta and took shelter, with a large group of his armed followers, in the Guru Nanak Niwas situated within the precincts of the Golden Temple.
In August 1982, the Akali Dal, led by Longowal, launched the Dharam Yudh (religious war) Morcha, which gained a lot of support from the Sikhs. And it did not take long for Bhindranwale to begin dominating the scene.
***
Accompanied by the Indian Express’ Amritsar-based staff correspondent Sanjeev Gaur, I met Bhindranwale during my visit to that city on 1 November 1983. Then 36, the tall and wiry Bhindranwale, surrounded by his armed guards, spent the better part of the day sitting on his charpoy (cot) on the roof of the Guru Nanak Niwas. People went to him, presented their offerings and listened to his sermons before leaving. He could be heard telling his male followers to be true to the faith, to abstain from drinking and smoking, to show respect to women and not to trim their beards. He also never forgot to advise them to arm themselves and buy revolvers and motorcycles. He also recounted the ‘fake police encounters with innocent Sikhs’, and asked his followers to prepare themselves to fight the ‘government oppression’. And he punctuated all this by quoting liberally from the Guru Granth Sahib, the Sikhs’ holy book.
Bhindranwale was quite a bully too. He humiliated his followers in public. Journalists found him domineering and not willing to be interrupted or contradicted. When he met them, he was always surrounded by his armed guards. And at the end of each interview, he invariably asked the interviewer: ‘Has anyone given you a better interview so far?’
During the course of my interview, I asked him: ‘What will be your reaction if the police or any paramilitary force enters the Guru Nanak Niwas as the government says some terrorists are hiding in the building?’ Bhindranwale’s answer was: ‘Time will tell. But I repeat what I said six months ago. If the police entered the Golden Temple Complex, it will serve as the first stone of the foundation of Khalistan.’
Bhindranwale took foreign journalists more seriously. They turned up in large numbers and invariably asked him about his stand on Khalistan. Bhindranwale’s response used to always be the same: ‘I am neither against Khalistan nor for it. The Sikhs want to live in India but not as second-class citizens. So it is for the Indian Government to decide whether it wants to keep the Sikhs in the country. If the government was willing to give Khalistan to the Sikhs, we shall not repeat the mistake we committed in 1947.’ (He perhaps meant that the Sikhs made the ‘mistake’ of not demanding a separate state for themselves in 1947 when some Muslims demanded and got Pakistan.)
During my interaction with him, I got the impression that he was an intolerant egoist. He presented himself as ‘the saviour of the Sikhs’, shutting his eyes to the fact that a large number of those killed by his armed motorcycle riders belonged to his own religion.
***
At the instance of Prabhash Joshi, I had started my weekly political column, Currents and Undercurrents, in 1980, which was published in the Indian Express on Sundays. My write-ups invited brickbats and bouquets – brickbats from militants and their supporters during the pre-Operation Bluestar5 and post-Operation Bluestar periods and bouquets from common readers and not so common public figures during the post-Operation Bluestar period.
The militants (operating from their Golden Temple Complex bastion) were extremely angry with me because of the relentless criticism of their violent actions and killing of innocent people in my columns. I got an anonymous telephone call (in late 1982) warning me that, along with the names of other well-known journalists (such as Arun Shourie, M. J. Akbar, Prem Bhatia and N. C. Menon), my name too was on the militants’ hit list. I also received threatening letters. In one such letter (undated) written in English purportedly by a person describing himself as my ‘friend’, I was informed that ‘a meeting of the Sikh Students’ Federation was held at Amritsar on 11 December 1982 which deputed some persons to eliminate you and your family. Being a friend I felt that I should inform you to leave Chandigarh for some time. As I was in the meeting I cannot disclose my name. It may happen this month or in the first week of January 1983’.
From the language and the tenor of the letter, I suspected it to be the handiwork of persons close to the state’s ruling Congress leadership, which was unhappy with me because I had found fault with the government’s handling of the situation in Punjab.
Some months later, I received another undated letter written in Punjabi (Gurmukhi script) by one describing himself as a spokesman of the pro-Khalistan militant body: the Dashmesh Regiment. It warned me that ‘if you do not stop writing against the Sikhs (militants) you would also meet the fate Lala Jagat Narain had met’. (As mentioned earlier in this chapter, Lala Jagat Narain had been shot dead by militants near Ludhiana on 9 September 1981.) His son, Ramesh Chander, who succeeded his father as editor of the Hind Samachar Group’s newspapers, was also shot dead by the militants on 12 May 1984. The second letter prompted me to change my view about the first letter. I began to believe it was perhaps also written by a militant ‘friend’.
All these developments strengthened my belief that if there are threats, you are on the right track.
I later came to know that the intelligence agencies too had obtained information that the militants (at their 11 December 1982 meeting in Amritsar) had decided to eliminate some journalists, including me. The government then informed me that, as a security measure, police guards would be deployed outside my residence and a personal security officer (PSO) would accompany me wherever I went. I declined the offer of police guards, pointing out that their tents outside my house would make my family an easily identifiable target. The government, however, insisted on providing me a PSO. I did not resist. I used to be my armed plainclothes PSO’s driver every day when I went to attend the morning meeting of the Indian Express staffers. After the meeting I would ask him to go home as I did not want him to accompany me during my routine news-hunting trips to the Punjab and Haryana Secretariat where I met several political leaders! (In his letter of 10 October 1990, the Chandigarh DGP informed me that the PSO was being withdrawn ‘due to the acute shortage of manpower’.)
Some well-wishers advised me to procure a licensed weapon for self-protection. My response was that I could neither afford to buy a weapon nor did I know how to use one! However, one of my friends, a Haryana minister, insisted that I must possess a gun as it would give me confidence in the event of an emergency. He transferred his pistol in my name as he had an automatic carbine. The government soon gave me an arms licence. After about two years, I returned the pistol to my friend.
***
Overconfidence often makes reporters indiscreet. I was also a victim of indiscretion, if not of unpardonable folly, during one of my visits to Amritsar to interview Akali Dal President Sant Harchand Singh Longowal (before the June 1984 Operation Bluestar). I was carrying the pistol in the pocket of my trousers.
Longowal was then staying in the Teja Singh Samundri Hall adjacent to the Golden Temple Complex. I went to meet him in his first-floor room. His plainclothes security guard posted outside his room asked me to wait as Santji was in a meeting. Luckily, my intuition made me conscious of the folly of carrying a weapon. I rushed back to the ground floor and placed my pistol in my briefcase, which I had deposited with Avinashi Singh (the secretary of the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee or SGPC). After my interview, when I came back to collect my briefcase, Avinashi Singh told me that the Sant’s eagle-eyed security guard had informed him that I had a tamancha (pistol) in my pocket! My intuition saved me from the embarrassment that would have resulted had I taken the pistol along during my meeting with Longowal.
During the interview, Longowal expressed his anxiety about the extremely tense situation in the complex. His body language also betrayed his apprehension about his own safety though he did not talk about it openly.
***
On 15 December 1983, Bhindranwale decided to move from the Guru Nanak Niwas with his armed entourage to the Akal Takht6 (also within the Golden Temple Complex) despite, I was told, the objections of Giani Kirpal Singh (the head priest of the Akal Takht).
It was alleged that Bhindranwale skilfully used his connections with Gurcharan Singh Tohra for achieving his goal. Tohra, the president of the SGPC, was responsible for maintaining peace and harmony in the Golden Temple Complex. Moreover, Tohra, being the appointing authority of all priests (including the head priest), claimed to have overruled the indignant Giani Kirpal Singh and permitted Bhindranwale to shift to the Akal Takht.
One of the reasons that prompted Bhindranwale to leave the Guru Nanak Niwas was the apprehension that Longowal (who was instrumental in inviting him to stay in the Golden Temple Complex) could be physically harmed by his (Bhindranwale’s) armed cohorts, something he wanted to avoid.
***
After moving into the Akal Takht, Bhindranwale fortified the Golden Temple Complex with light and heavy arms and turned it into his bastion for launching a separatist campaign. Thereafter, the Akali leadership could never muster the courage to force Bhindranwale and his armed men to leave the Akal Takht.
Apart from the Congress and the Akali leaders who tried to use Bhindranwale for fulfilling their political objectives (before he converted the Golden Temple Complex into a fortress), sections of the Punjab Police are also believed to have helped him in procuring arms, which was quite an alarming development. They acted as a conduit for clandestinely smuggling in sophisticated light and heavy weapons into the Golden Temple Complex. They, in fact, had developed vested interests in such an activity, which had become a quick means of amassing wealth.
These weapons were used by the separatist militants for killing large numbers of innocent people and also against the Indian Army during the June 1984 Operation Bluestar, which was aimed at flushing out the militants from Sikhism’s holiest shrine.
On 27 November 1983, the Punjab home secretary, N. N. Vohra (a conscientious and straightforward official who later occupied the posts of Union home secretary, defence secretary and governor of Jammu and Kashmir), had received reports on how even some senior police officers were helping militants (who were taking shelter in the complex) to accumulate arms and ammunition.
The Government of India’s 10 July 1984 White Paper on the Punjab Situation revealed (para 32, p. 33) that ‘the security forces checked a “kar sewa”7 truck (carrying material for the community kitchen) on 11 May 1984 and recovered Sten guns, arms and ammunition. The truck was found to be registered in the name of Shri Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale.’
Giving details of the case, Vohra informed me that Ajay Pal Singh Mann, a former senior superintendent of police (SSP), Amritsar, who was later posted as commandant Punjab Armed Police (PAP), Jalandhar, had helped in the smuggling of arms into the Golden Temple Complex. After checking thirteen kar sewa trucks carrying material for the langar (community kitchen) within the complex, Mann left the place without checking the fourteenth truck. The unchecked truck carried sophisticated weapons, including two anti-tank grenade launchers, Sten guns and ammunition. These items had been smuggled from Pakistan through the border at Khem Karan (about 60 km from Amritsar). The last truck was the one the aforementioned White Paper referred to.
It was proposed to dismiss Mann from service and also arrest him. The Punjab Home Department officials claimed that Mann ‘owned huge assets’. Later, overruling reservations by a senior officer, the Punjab Government sacked Mann. This was the first case in Punjab of a senior IPS officer being given the boot.
***
India’s new generation may not be fully aware of the horrors of terrorism that Punjab and the neighbouring regions had experienced during the 1980s and early 1990s. Apart from the regular killings (mostly of innocent people), the scourge of terrorism had not only made all constitutional bodies and political parties in Punjab irrelevant but had also posed serious threats to the country’s unity and integrity. The alarming situation that prevailed in the state during that period has been documented by a wide variety of publications (newspapers, magazines and books) and also by the electronic media, the Internet and film makers. In my write-ups (published as lead articles in the Sunday magazine sections of the Indian Express, pre-Operation Bluestar), I too contributed my bit. The following excerpts from a couple of articles (dated 8 May 1983 and 6 November 1983) explain the background of the events, Punjab’s then-prevailing political scenario and the security environment that had developed in the state. Here is the first excerpt:
The last two decades in the Punjab have witnessed two extremes: The Green Revolution and gun-wielding, bomb-throwing killer squads. The Green Revolution, ushered in by the state’s hard-working and predominantly Sikh peasantry in the mid-1960s, has made India almost self-sufficient in food. The emergence of Sikh extremist killer squads in the beginning of the 1980s symptomizes the spread of religious fundamentalism, from Muslim-dominated West Asia, Iran and Pakistan to Sikh-dominated Punjab. It has created another flashpoint, a potential threat to the integrity of the country, on its sensitive western border.
Though a variety of historical, religious, economic and extra-territorial factors have also contributed, the current explosive situation in the state is really the culmination of a tussle for power. Since 1947, various sections of the Sikh leadership in the two main parties, the Congress and the Akali Dal, have been battling for supremacy. While successive Akali leaders have been exploiting the susceptibilities of the deeply religious and tradition-bound Sikh community to achieve their objective, the Congress has overwhelmingly depended on the support of the Hindus and Harijans [now called Dalits] – and only partly on the Sikhs – to retain or capture power in the Punjab.
In their ‘no-holds-barred’ struggle for power, certain sections of both the Congress and the Akali Dal have been mobilizing secessionist elements and religious fanatics to play the game. It is no longer a secret that after the Emergency, some Congress leaders encouraged the pro-Khalistan Dal Khalsa to embarrass the Akali-dominated Punjab government. Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale – leader of the religious extremists, who does not go anywhere without a group of armed followers – was also made a pawn in pursuing this objective. It is another matter that he later became a militant ally of the Akali leaders who are now repeating the performance of their Congress rivals.
RS 1.13 LAKH BANK ROBBERY IN LUDHIANA
ONE KILLED, FIVE HURT IN SHOOTOUTS, GRENADE ATTACKS
EIGHT SHOT DEAD BY EXTREMISTS
CHIEF MINISTER DARBARA SINGH RESIGNS [on 10 October 1983]
CENTRAL RULE IN PUNJAB
PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH UT [union territory] DECLARED DISTURBED AREAS
JAIL OFFICIAL KIDNAPPED – TRADER SHOT DEAD
FOUR NIHANGS [armed sikhs in dark blue attires] KILLED IN ENCOUNTER
ARMED FORCES GIVEN WIDE POWERS
TERRORISTS KILL FIVE IN CHANDIGARH
GRENADE LOBBED AT CHANDIGARH POLICE STATION
SECURITY TIGHTENED AT [punjab and haryana] SECRETARIAT
SI [subinspector] SHOT DEAD IN AMRITSAR
SABOTEURS BEHIND TRAIN ACCIDENT – DEATH TOLL 17, 125 INJURED
SWOOP ON EXTREMISTS IN FIVE DISTRICTS
SANGRUR [a place in south-eastern punjab] BANK LOOTED
These are some of the headlines which have appeared in the newspapers (in a chronological order) last month [October 1983].
It is a different Punjab today. There is no field of activity which has not been affected by the escalating terrorist violence in the state. Trade and business have been badly hit with traders from outside dreading visits to the state. The reduced inflow of migratory labour from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar poses a threat to the state’s agricultural economy.
After the murder of six bus passengers on 5 October, which forced the Centre to impose president’s rule, followed by the derailment of the Sealdah Express at Mandi Gobindgarh which killed 17 persons, road and rail travel has become a hazard. Though people have not stopped going to cinema houses or other places of entertainment, their number has dwindled considerably. Filmgoers, who are particularly concerned about personal safety, buy tickets for seats near the back of the theatre as there is less risk of being hit if somebody rolls a grenade down the aisle.
In the bigger cities, the crowds in the bazaars start thinning soon after dusk – an increasing number of people want to avoid remaining outdoors late at night. Fear runs high despite constant patrolling by men belonging to the Punjab Police and the paramilitary forces.
This feeling of insecurity is not just confined to the Hindu-dominated urban areas. It also pervades the countryside, which has a high concentration of Sikhs, though for different reasons. The fear of the killer squads riding two wheelers haunts urban dwellers while, in the rural areas, ordinary criminals have begun to take advantage of the current lawlessness thereby injecting an increasing sense of insecurity in the already troubled state.
The most disturbing aspect of the present situation is that a sense of mistrust has developed between the Hindus and the Sikhs, particularly in the cities. One can smell the tension.
Chaos attracts foreign interference. The present situation in Punjab seems to be ideal ground for Pakistani mischief-making. Although there is no concrete evidence available yet, intelligence agencies suspect that money and material are flowing into Punjab in vast quantities from across the border. The arms being smuggled are believed to include those supplied to the Afghan refugees by the US to fight the Russians [Soviets]. The gun running and spying are mostly done by smugglers who have contacts on both sides of the border. There are also reports that well-trained Pakistani spies are operating in the garb of Sikhs.
***
The 1980s witnessed turbulence all over Punjab. The separatists, led by Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale, launched a movement in support of their demand for Khalistan by converting the Golden Temple Complex into their stronghold for turning Punjab into a graveyard of innocent people.
By mid-May 1984, Punjab was in the grip of the worst possible terror. Political parties became irrelevant. Politicians were being killed indiscriminately by the militants. Even the Akali leaders started toeing the separatist-militants’ line. The state administration stood paralysed. The police personnel were completely demoralized. But that did not prevent them from being more concerned about making money and about their own safety than the safety of the people. The judiciary was subdued. In fact, many judges avoided hearing cases against terrorists, fearing for their lives.
Commenting on the Punjab situation in his article (India Today, 26 September 2011), K. T. S. Tulsi (a Sikh), a senior advocate of the Supreme Court, wrote: ‘One criminal case that frustrated me greatly was the one that related to the attempt on the life of Julio Ribeiro [in October 1986], then DGP of Punjab. I remember opposing the bail applications of the accused on a winter afternoon in the high security prison at Sangrur. Even on the cold day, I was surprised to notice beads of sweat on the forehead of the judge. When I turned around, I saw the accused, all 6 footers, glaring … at the judge. Bail was granted despite the airtight case. Most of the judges handling terrorist cases were terribly scared. It is only when normalcy returned to Punjab that the judiciary became active again. The worst was that all the judges who had succumbed to fear or pressure received normal promotions. That epitomized the lack of accountability of the judiciary.’
***
In the early 1980s, New Delhi initiated moves for holding talks with the Akali leadership to stem the deteriorating situation. Although several rounds of negotiations were held between top government ministers and the Akali moderates, no success could be achieved. Meanwhile, as stated earlier, Bhindranwale and his followers had consolidated their position within the Golden Temple Complex.
On 19 February 1984, Balwant Singh, who later became finance minister in the Surjit Singh Barnala-led Akali Dal Government in Punjab (formed in September 1985) disclosed to me some interesting bits of information. He told me that President Giani Zail Singh had asked him to bring Parkash Singh Badal and Gurcharan Singh Tohra to meet him (Zail Singh). Gianiji added that he would then be able to intervene with the PM to find a solution to the vexatious Punjab problem. For his part, Balwant Singh requested Zail Singh to first sound the PM out and ascertain to what extent she could go (to meet the Akalis’ demands). Zail Singh’s reply was tangential. He told Balwant Singh that the Akali Dal should have claimed victory for the imposition of president’s rule in Punjab (after the resignation of the Darbara Singh Congress Government in October 1983). Balwant Singh responded by asserting that president’s rule was never the Akalis’ demand and, in fact, the continuation of Darbara Singh as CM would have rather suited them.
The separatist terrorists were clearly working on a plan to engineer exchanges of population in Punjab. They were targeting the Hindus in Punjab to create an atmosphere that would force them to migrate to other parts of India and in return Sikhs from the rest of the country would flock to Punjab. Pakistan later (in the 1990s) partly succeeded in implementing such a plan in Kashmir by fostering terrorism and creating a situation that forced the Kashmiri Pandits to migrate from the Valley.
However, in Punjab the plan for such an exchange of population failed for three reasons: The centuries-old strong bonds between the Hindus and the Sikhs; the majority of the Sikhs opposed the separatist terrorists; and the might of the state that suppressed the terrorists through no-holds-barred onslaughts after Beant Singh (belonging to the Congress) took over as chief minister on 25 February 1992. Unfortunately, he was killed in a bomb blast in Chandigarh on 31 August 1995 (details given in Chapter 27).
***
Understandably, the entire nation was deeply concerned about the Punjab situation as the happenings in the state posed a threat to India’s unity and integrity. The Government of India faced the dilemma of how to deal with the situation as any extreme action against the terrorists who had made the Sikhs’ holiest shrine their bastion could lead to serious religio-political problems; in case the GOI just kept on holding talks with the Akalis, its position would become untenable.
There is one particular incident that is worth recounting. In early 1983, the top-level Punjab Government circles were abuzz with rumours alleging that, at one stage, a plan had been drawn up (by a retired, senior Indian Police Service officer), at New Delhi’s instance, to eliminate Bhindranwale. When he showed his plan to the authorities, they asked him to handle the whole operation himself and he would be provided as much money as was needed to carry it out. The officer, however, said he would work without any remuneration. He paid several visits to Punjab and to the Golden Temple Complex in disguise. The plan, which was to be executed by a prominent functionary of a warrior Sikh sect through four trained persons, two from Punjab and two from outside, was abandoned as it was later decided (at the highest political level) that the Indian Army would tackle Bhindranwale. Highly places sources told me that ‘the GOI managed to acquire all the information about arms with the militants within the Golden Temple Complex through the Sikh sect’s functionary who would visit Gurdwara Baba Deep Singh after going to the Golden Temple. At the gurdwara he would pass on all the information to the government’s contact man, said to be a senior Punjab police officer from Jalandhar (A. S. Atwal)’.
Atwal, deputy inspector general (DIG) of police, who had almost penetrated the Bhindranwale camp, was double-crossed and, on 25 April 1983, was shot dead just outside the Golden Temple Complex. An inspector who was near the scene of murder failed to take the body into his custody. Later, action was taken against him for dereliction of duty.
***
As Punjab was being inexorably sucked into the vortex of terrorism, the Central Government held a series of talks with the moderate Akali leaders in late 1983 and early 1984, but to no avail. It was then that Prime Minister Indira Gandhi decided to send in the Indian Army to evict the militants holed up in the Golden Temple Complex. Thus was launched Operation Bluestar, one of the most crucial events in the post-independence history of India.
__________________
1 Chandrashekhar (a former Congressman) went on to become the prime minister of India on 10 November 1990.
2 Gujral (also a former Congressman) became the prime minister of India on 21 April 1997.
3 Arun Singh was inducted as minister of state for defence in 1985 in the Rajiv Gandhi Government.
4 Captain Amarinder Singh went on to become chief minister of Punjab on 26 February 2002.
5 During Operation Bluestar (3 to 8 June 1984), the Indian Army (upon instructions from Prime Minister Indira Gandhi) entered the Golden Temple Complex in order to flush out Bhindranwale and his armed followers. (See also Chapter 15.)
6 The Akal Takht (literally meaning immortal throne) is the highest seat of temporal authority of the Khalsa. Khalsa refers to the community of fully initiated Sikhs to which boys are admitted after attaining puberty.
7 Voluntary or selfless service performed by the devotees.