There are many ways to approach painting outdoors. This chapter features some of the ways you might like to start, but it is by no means all-inclusive. There are days when I abandon all previous methods of beginning, so that I can explore something new or just make a big mess!
I created this 12-by-9-inch painting on-site in New York City. It was morning, and the guy who owned the hot dog cart was just getting started. The scene was backlit, throwing shadows toward me. That strong morning light negated some of the color, turning the local color into a warm neutral. I loved the steam that was rising up from that first batch of hot dogs, and I used dry-brush scumbling over an already dry passage to indicate it. I did not have much time that morning, so it was necessary to get the gist of the vision I had for the painting in a short amount of time.
First, I eliminated the buildings behind the trees. The buildings would help set the scene in the city, but the vendor’s setup is my story. I also eliminated about a dozen other people. I felt that to include them would prove unnecessary distraction. I want the viewer to focus on the vendor, the setup, the shadows, and particularly that steam.
For the sake of this demonstration, I’ve reproduced my toned panel, including the outlines of all the basic shapes I needed. Notice that there are two lines: one dark line in pencil and another in white pencil on top of that. My cadmium red light-toned panel was too close in value to the graphite pencil lines, making the lines hard to see. I always carry a white water-soluble pencil for such occasions. White against the mid-value cadmium red light shows up much better.
Many artists like to do a value study (black, white, and grays) before they begin the final painting. This is also called a grisaille. Most often this is done as a small version to help the artist better see their value plan, but this gray beginning can also be used as the first base layer. I skip this step when painting in the field. If I deem it necessary to have a value plan, I do it in pencil in my sketchbook.
Let’s take a look at my vendor painting in grayscale. This would be a fair approximation of an actual grisaille painting using values only. I like the way the middle values hold the lights and darks together. In this painting, there are lots of middle values: mostly light with a bit of dark. This is a good ratio of values, and this relationship also holds true for color temperature. It can be visually confusing to have fifty percent warm colors and fifty percent cool colors. With an equal balance of warm to cool, there is no clear dominance and your painting will lack unity. As I paint, I keep this idea close. I try to lean my paintings either warm or cool, with bits of the opposite also included. Take a look at the examples provided here.
We want to avoid an even split of warm and cool colors. As soon as you get close to an even split in temperature, the visual vibration can be unsettling to the viewer. I believe it was Picasso who said something like, “You should be able to say, this is a ‘blue’ painting or this is a ‘red’ painting.” He also believed that a dominance of hue (and therefore temperature) holds everything together. Let’s take a look at two examples of a warm-dominant painting and a cool-dominant painting.
Occasionally, I may skip creating the pencil sketch and go directly to painting because I’m anxious to capture the scene and light before it changes. If I make a mistake in terms of value (how light or dark one shape is compared to another), hue (the actual color used), or temperature (how warm or cool the selected color is), I can correct it because I know how fast acrylics dry.
It was a rare January day in Michigan with temperatures in the high forties. The accumulated snow had melted. The afternoon light was coming in at a low angle from left to right, and the red dogwood bush seemed to glow. I set up in my front yard to capture the evening light hitting the pine trees, the field grass, and the red dogwood. I had to work fast, so I got right to work. No preliminary value plan this time. My easel was loaded with my usual eight or nine colors: cobalt blue, phthalo blue, ultramarine blue, alizarin crimson, cadmium red light, cadmium yellow deep, cadmium yellow light, and titanium white.
I previously applied cadmium red light to an 8-inch square birchwood painting panel. I often use this color, as cadmium red light is a middle value straight out of the tube. This means that when I apply a stroke of another color, I can tell if that passage is lighter or darker than a mid-tone. It helps me determine my values. Another advantage is allowing some of the warm red to peek out as I paint. If I want my painting to have a warm dominance, I allow more of the cadmium red light to show. If I want my painting to have a cool dominance, I let less cadmium red light show. It acts as a warm accent to my cool colors.
I sometimes tone my canvases or panels with other colors, either to create the sky before I begin or to create a color scheme more fitting to the scene. I also sometimes begin on a white, gessoed surface that comes from a commercially prepared canvas or panel. Similar to an oil painting, my first pass is sometimes a wash of a warm neutral color to knock down the white.
The atmosphere changes the way we see color; as colors recede into the distance, they get both cooler and grayer. I almost always exaggerate atmospheric, or aerial, perspective. This painting will have a warm dominance, and I want the tree line to act as a foil to those warm colors.
I wipe my brush off with a paper towel. I don’t always clean my brush between color changes because it saves both water and time. When the brush has a little bit of the previous mixture on the bristles, it blends with the next mixture and provides a bit of unity to the whole painting. Some of everything is everywhere!
I use cobalt blue, ultramarine blue, alizarin crimson, and a bit of cadmium yellow deep to create a dark, neutral violet. Still using my size 6 short flat, I paint this darker mixture (still one value lighter than black) on the lower part of the pines and in the foreground weeds. Both areas are in shadow.
Time to add the light. For the red dogwood bush itself, I use a mixture of cadmium red light, alizarin crimson, a small amount of cadmium yellow deep, and white. I paint the sunlit side of the bush, and as I work my way around to the shadow side, I add more alizarin to the mixture. I use short, quick strokes to create an impression of the light hitting that bush.
I sometimes leave the sky for last. It helps me key the rest of the painting both in terms of value (the lighter the sky, the darker the other shapes appear) and in terms of the dominant temperature of the whole. In this case, I use lots of titanium white with some cadmium yellow light and just a touch of phthalo blue. I apply this mixture starting along the top of the distant tree shapes and in and around the middle ground pines. As I work my way up the panel (the sky usually gets darker as you approach the zenith), I add more phthalo blue into the mix.
If I have to choose between finding a beautiful scene and painting it, and finding an acceptable scene and making the best painting I can, I almost always choose the latter.
Why? There is much beauty in the world. As I write this, I look out over the gardens that fill our backyard, and even though it is early spring, I can already see the flowers poking through. The grass is starting to green up, and the birds—back from their winter migration—are singing loudly. A beautiful scene for sure, but painted as is, I’m afraid it would be very boring. There’s still a lot of brown, only one temperature of green, a cloudless blue sky, and small shadows (as it’s close to noon).
Could I make a painting from what I’m seeing? Of course! But I’d have to get creative: change some of those browns to warm and cool grays; add variety to the greens; add clouds to an otherwise uninspiring sky; elongate the shadows; and connect foreground, middle ground, and background.
While I do sometimes paint exactly what I see, the excitement for me comes from rearranging what nature provides to make the best painting I can. This often means leaving out much of what I see. Like a camera, our eyes visually gather too much information. The problem with attempting to include everything in our paintings is that it becomes a confusing bundle of imagery.
What to do? There are two choices: Search until you find a scene that needs little in terms of adjustment, or paint the first thing that captures your eye and redesign what you see to make a good painting.
In Morning Reflections with Pond (opposite), I painted the scene almost exactly as I perceived it. The light was subdued, and the greens were varied. It was early in the morning so the sky appeared more yellow than blue, and the reflections in the pond were a close mirror to the grasses and trees from above.
Even the title is a “reflection” of what I was seeing. I felt I captured my sense of being there, and I was happy with that day’s effort. There is a certain joy in painting things we find beautiful. And while I find that kind of effort to be fulfilling, sometimes I want to do much more.
Many variables determine the final version of any painting. Location, time, mood, visual problems to solve—the list is endless. The time of day and the atmospheric conditions at the time are also major determinants of how your painting will turn out.
Capturing natural light changes will help you tell your visual story with more clarity. You have two choices: Do your best to paint the light and atmosphere exactly as you perceive it, or artistically alter what you see to make the painting you conceive in your mind’s eye (in other words, exercise your artistic license). Both options are entirely valid.
As the day progresses, the angle of the sun and quality of the light change. As plein air painters, we can follow this progression. The quality of the light is a combination of these factors: time of day and the relative atmospheric conditions at the time of set up. The atmosphere can vary from day to day—even hour to hour—and change within minutes. When I’m planning to spend a day painting outside, one of the first things I do is check the morning weather report to see what conditions to expect.
Here in Michigan we fully experience all four seasons: spring, summer, fall, and a four- to six-month winter. If I were to wait for perfect weather, I would not get out to paint much! In the colder months, cloudy skies are the norm, as are chilly and frigid temperatures. Painting outside in Michigan can be a rugged affair, but as long as the outside temperature is above freezing (32°F), I am ready to go.
It is helpful to paint the same area or view in the different seasons. The light changes from season to season, just as it does at different times of the day. The foliage changes as the season progresses, and the amount of light that bounces into the shadows also changes. Take a look at the next four plein air paintings completed from the same location: a stand of trees about two miles from my home (opposite page). They sit on the edge of a farmer’s field. All four paintings are small and were completed in under an hour.
Sometimes, as we search for subject matter, we spend more time looking for that “perfect spot” than we do actually painting. Instead, use what nature provides and manipulate what you observe to make a better painting. Find one or two interesting things; then build a painting around them. Remember, you are the artist—you can add, subtract, and alter anything you like. Design or arrange the elements in your painting to make a unified whole. Let your initial enthusiasm direct your efforts to make the painting you want to make.
We don’t have many sunny days in our Michigan winters. It’s cold and snowy for up to six months of the year, and spring comes slowly. I love to go for a drive on those rare occasions when the sun shines. My cameras are always with me: a point-and-shoot with a good telephoto lens and, of course, my cell phone camera.
I was out for an evening drive, and the sun had almost set. There was a warm glow touching the tops of the distant trees. The foreground and middle ground were bathed in shadow. I snapped a photograph (at right) that shows the scene; it also shows too many telephone poles, mailboxes, and traffic.
I used the photo as inspiration, but I did not do the painting outside. It was too cold! Instead, I worked with what nature gave me to make a painting. I kept just three telephone poles, leaning the middle one toward the center of interest—that glow of sunset. I saturated the cool blue of the snow to a bright violet. I also added a cool blue in the sky to replace the warm neutral tone that was washed out by the sun.
Using this cool blue heightened the warm red-orange I chose for the distant tree line. Finally, I changed from a rectangular format to a square composition to put more emphasis on the red-orange trees.
Here is another example. As I came around a bend, the converging lines that formed the edges of the road captured my interest. This led to a vanishing point of sunlit trees around the bend. I also enjoyed the dance of light across the road and up the snow-covered hill on the right.
I took the photo (below), which gave me enough information to complete the painting in the studio. I wanted to capture the road leading into the distance, the dappled light across the snow, and the deep blue-violet of the shadows.
When working from photographic references, I always consider whether I like the painting more than the photo.
In this case, I do. As an artist, you should never feel you are locked into any given scene, colors, or methods. The creative and fun part is to change things to make a great painting!