A strong man battles the enemy without and within
See page 317 for visitor information.
We are standing on top of Tel Bet Shemesh, which looks out on the scene of the Samson stories. The ancient city, an area comprising seven acres on the hilltop, sat at the crossroads of three cultures: Philistine, Canaanite, and Israelite. Named for the Canaanite sun god, it was home to the Israelites when the ark of the covenant, captured by the Philistines in battle, was returned to them (check out the full story in 1 Samuel 6). Archaeological excavations from the period of Judges indicate a large village with Canaanite-style architecture and pottery. The animal bones found here suggest the inhabitants did not eat pork, a food eschewed by both Canaanites and Israelites. Neighborly relations seem to have been cordial.
During the tenth–eighth centuries BCE Bet Shemesh expanded into a large administrative center with complex fortifications, an iron workshop, and an impressive underground reservoir hewn from the rock. The Israelite city was ultimately destroyed by the Assyrians in 701 BCE. The reservoir was eventually blocked with 150 tons of landfill to prevent Judaeans from returning to resettle the city. Bet Shemesh ultimately lost its prominence; it is mentioned once in the Talmudic literature as a very small town (j. Ta‘anit 4).
Fig. 5. Tel Bet Shemesh
Remains of a fifth-century CE Byzantine monastery are visible here.
Behind you, to the east of the tel, is the modern city of Bet Shemesh. Straight ahead, westward, is Yishi, a moshav founded by Yemenite immigrants in 1950. To the right, northwest, is Kibbutz Zorah, named for the biblical town of Zorah, which was located nearby. You passed Eshtaol as you came here on Route 38, and Timnah, also not visible from here, would have been located several miles northwest of Bet Shemesh. All these towns are mentioned in the Samson stories.
The Samson cycle of stories in Judges 13–16 takes place on the home turf of Israel’s most formidable enemy, the Philistines. The tribe of Dan, Samson’s tribe, set out to claim its inheritance in the area between the foothills of Judaea and the coastal plain, a rich swath of agricultural land controlling an important segment of the ancient trade route. However, this area had already been claimed by an invader arriving in ancient Canaan from the west, about the same time the children of Israel were arriving from the east and settling in the promised land. The Philistines were one of the Sea Peoples who left their homelands in the Aegean Sea following a violent upheaval at the beginning of the twelfth century BCE. They arrived in the land of Israel from the sea, violently displacing the local Canaanites who lived there and taking control of the coastal plain and inner lowlands.
The Philistines are portrayed in the Bible as strong and organized, but they are repeatedly referred to as “uncircumcised,” evidently their most distinguishing characteristic in a region where Israelites, many Canaanite peoples, and Egyptians practiced circumcision. This ethnic and cultural marker set them apart from the locals and the readers who identified with them. Today “Philistine” is a byword for a person lacking in culture and indifferent to aesthetic values (regardless of what’s under his overalls). This misguided stereotype is a minor victory for the authors of the Bible, who clearly wished us to remember the Philistines in a negative light.
However, the archaeological evidence teaches us that the Philistines were a highly sophisticated society. The technological innovations they brought with them to Canaan deeply enriched the local culture and sparked a long-lasting developmental trend in the eastern Mediterranean. The Sea Peoples invented the prototype of the ship widely used for commerce in the region for hundreds of years, as well as important innovations such as advanced rigging, the crow’s nest, and the composite anchor. Their round-bottomed jars safely fitted into round holes in the hold enabled the safe transport of liquids such as wine and oil over the high seas, and their introduction of square-cut building stones became a standard of local architecture. They had a unique style of pottery and a well-organized administrative system.
Perhaps most importantly the Philistines held a distinct advantage over the tribes of Israel in two realms: military prowess and metallurgy. The Israelite army was made up of volunteers, often reluctant tribesmen who had to be convinced to take up arms. The Philistine army was well organized, consisting of multitudes of conscripted troops ready to operate on very short notice. They took control of the fertile coastal plain and the valleys of the lowlands, threatening to move eastward into the Israelite enclaves.
The second significant advantage of the Philistines over the Israelites was their monopoly of metal technology and raw materials. The seafaring Philistines were able to access the international markets for tin and copper, the two components of bronze. Tin was unavailable at this time in ancient Israel. They also arrived in Canaan already equipped with the technology and the means to transform iron into steel, enabling them to outfit their army with swords, spears, and fittings for chariots. (For an abbreviated catalog of some of these items, read the description of Goliath as he goes out to battle in 1 Sam. 17:4–7.) The Philistines ensured that the Israelites would remain militarily inferior by preventing their access to bronze and iron. They allowed their Israelite neighbors to patronize Philistine blacksmiths in order to service their agricultural implements (1 Sam. 13:19–22), but the Israelites had no means of producing or procuring bronze and iron weapons, putting them at a distinct disadvantage vis-à-vis their Philistine adversaries.
Judges 13 begins with the standard opener we have come to expect in the stories of the settlement period in the book of Judges: the undisciplined Israelites had strayed from the path of faith yet again, and God had punished them by delivering them into the hands of the enemy. This time it was the Philistines, and the Israelite tribes of Dan and Judah had suffered under them for forty years. Presumably, God was ready to give them a break and dispatched an angel to inform the barren wife of Manoah the Danite that she would conceive a son. This child would be dedicated to the Lord, and “he shall be the first to deliver Israel from the Philistines” (13:5).
Right away we know this story is not going to end well. The phrase “he shall be the first” implies that the liberation of Israel from the Philistines will be a long, tortuous process that will not be completed by Samson (but eventually by David). He will have impressive successes, but he will not vanquish the enemy; rather, they will vanquish him. The people of Israel have not yet proven their commitment to the covenant they made with God. Therefore, they are not deserving of complete deliverance. Instead, they get a problematic hero. This is a setup.
For starters Samson’s pedigree is somewhat questionable. His mother is never mentioned by name, remaining largely anonymous throughout the story. His father, Manoah, is depicted as a doofus; he is not privy to the announcement of Samson’s conception and is left trailing after his wife in search of information from the messenger angel (Judg.13:11). Much has been written in the rabbinic literature about his bumbling nature and dubious intelligence. Not the sharpest tool in the shed. Curiously, an intimate union between Manoah and his wife is never reported. In fact, some commentators have suggested that Manoah’s absence when the angel spoke to his wife the first time is a hint to the identity of Samson’s real father. She was out there by herself in a field when the angel appeared, no witnesses. Who knows what really happened, and anyway, would you blame her?
Young Samson was blessed by God and gradually grew aware of his special gifts. As a kind of BamBam Flintstone, innocent and naive, he no doubt surprised those around him and himself with his feats of superhuman strength. Although he may have been frightened by the realization that he was a freak of nature, perhaps he took comfort in knowing he was destined for great things. Then he hit puberty, and all hell broke loose.
Samson the hero struggled to build normative relationships with women. When we next meet him, he is hopelessly infatuated with a Philistine girl he had caught sight of on a jaunt to Timnah, a city of the uncircumcised. He demanded that his parents arrange a marriage to her at once, and they responded with that timeless “Jewish” guilt trip: couldn’t you find someone from the tribe to marry? Unbeknown to all of them, the hand of God was behind Samson’s hots for the Philistine maiden (Judg. 14:4), but it seems that even in ancient Israel gentile girls wielded a magnetic power over men of the Mosaic faith. What was it about them? Did they have cute, upturned noses? Narrow hips? Blonde highlights from frolics in the crow’s nest? Opposite these bewitching women, Samson couldn’t think straight.
The first showdown came at the wedding when Samson’s Philistine guests at the bachelor party were frustratingly stumped by his riddle. Clearly unwilling to concede gentlemanly defeat, they threatened to ice the bride and her family if she didn’t come up with the answer. An intelligent woman would have appealed rationally to her new husband: “Darling, the townies’ honor is at stake. If you make them look bad, they will kill me. Please find a way to let them win and boost their self-esteem so that you and I can conclude the celebrations and live together happily ever after.”
However, the Philistine bride (who, interestingly, also remained nameless) instead chose the newlywed tack: she accused Samson of withholding information because he didn’t really love her. She then proceeded to lock herself in the equivalent of the bathroom and to cry for the entire weeklong wedding party. She nagged her new husband so relentlessly that he finally gave in and revealed the answer to the riddle. Not only did Samson go home furious after being bested by the wedding guests, but the reader is left wondering how the hero of Israel gave in to a whining, vapid Philistine “princess.” He vented his anger by slaughtering thirty Philistines in Ashkelon. As the Samson story unfolds, every failed relationship with a Philistine girl will be followed by an act of terrorism.
After three experiences with Philistine women, hundreds of dead Philistines, and untold damage caused by Samson, the story climaxes with Delilah the infamous temptress. Her origins are never mentioned; she may have been a Judaean girl (according to the rabbinic commentators her Hebrew name means “she who weakened”) or the ultimate shiksa. She is the only woman in Samson’s life whose name is revealed to us, and we are told that Samson loved her, although she was unaware of his nazarite vows and the significance of his long hair. We never learn whether she loved him, but if she was willing to entrap him in exchange for money it’s possible that his love for her was unrequited. Samson must have known this, but he played along at her game, coyly offering false explanations for the secret of his strength. She tied him up every which way and made him jump while her handlers waited for results. He sent her running for fresh thongs, new ropes, pins with a loom—anything to keep her busy and out of reach of his secret. But Delilah too pulled the emotional card. “How can you say you love me, when you don’t confide in me?”(16:15). And he fell for it. Samson, the great Jewish hero, was humiliatingly defeated because he couldn’t resist the power of a nagging girlfriend. He succumbed knowing full well that the consequences would be horrendous, preferring death to her relentless hectoring.
The most vexing question about these stories is the glaring contradiction between Samson’s designation as a superhero without an army and his potential to defeat the Philistines, and his undoing to a very tragic end thanks to his great weakness in the face of a woman. Despite the unique circumstances of his birth and God’s blessing over him, Samson’s destiny was ultimately to be defeated by his own character flaws. How could God have chosen such a problematic individual to be the redeemer of Israel? What was God thinking when he devised this bizarre strategy to deliver his people?
If we reread the verses about Samson’s birth story and the prediction that he would begin the conquest of the Philistines, we can’t say we weren’t warned that the Philistines would prevail over him. Samson was not the ideal hero, but he was probably the best the Israelites had to offer in the search for leadership potential. The fact that he couldn’t deliver the goods was indicative of the sorry state the people of Israel had reached at this point. Scattered, incohesive, in constant violation of the special covenant they had taken on, the tribes of Israel were a mess. God, in his mercy, tried to help out, and Samson was the best material he had to work with. He was a reflection of the rut into which the Israelites had fallen and were now stuck, spinning their wheels wildly in an attempt to extricate themselves. In revealing the disappointing results of Samson’s gifts, the book of Judges is leading us toward an inevitable conclusion: the answer to Israel’s tribulations is not charismatic chieftains but rather a stable monarchy.
So, should we urge our kids to eat their spinach so they can be strong like Samson? The rabbinic sages concluded that Samson was not a great role model, insisting that physical strength is meaningless as long as it is not matched by strong character and integrity. The Mishna declares, “Who is strong? He who can control his desire”(Avot iv,1), thus effectively framing Samson in a negative light.
Yet, Samson’s might has left an indelible impression nonetheless. The Danite strongman is a bona fide brand name in modern Israel; the name “Samson” has been adopted by a diverse collection of groups such as units of the Israel Defense Forces, special force squads of the police, and a chain of body-building gyms. With the birth of the Zionist movement, the idea of the new Jew—physically strong, independent, and resolute—was nourished by the Samson character, who, rediscovered and reinvented, symbolized strength, self-reliance, and victory in his modern Zionist remaking.