George Catlett Marshall was born on the last day of 1880 between two worlds. His birthplace was Uniontown, Pennsylvania, a grimy industrial town fast becoming the coke capital of America. George’s father was a “coke baron,” a man who converted bituminous coal into a high-carbon ash used in blast furnaces for reducing ore to metallic iron. For a time George Senior rode the growth wave that transformed America into the world’s manufacturing powerhouse. Yet in George’s boyhood Uniontown was still geographically and culturally close to the rural countryside. His earliest memory was climbing up a ladder in the family barn, where the Marshalls kept a horse and a cow, to get a haymow, a piece of farm equipment. George indulged fully in the boyhood pleasures of nineteenth-century rural life. He never enjoyed cities and in later years would regret what industry had done to his hometown.
There was an even more significant divide in George’s youth and childhood. His parents represented a tradition at odds with the texture of life in southwestern Pennsylvania. Though both his father’s family, the Marshalls, and his mother’s, the Bradfords, had long resided in Kentucky, they traced their ancestry to Virginia. That pattern was not uncommon; hordes of old-stock Americans could claim Virginia origins, for the Old Dominion had scattered thousands of its sons and daughters across the nation’s landscape to merge and blend with streams of people from other commonwealths and other countries. Yet many of these Virginians, wherever they lived, held themselves special for their ancestry and their ancestral values.
The proud claim was based in part on a myth of royalist forebears fleeing Oliver Cromwell’s Puritan England. These high-toned Cavaliers had fought for King Charles I and fled Britain for America in the 1640s, when Cromwell’s low-born Roundheads triumphed and beheaded their monarch. In fact few English royalists actually sought refuge in the infant colony named for the Virgin Queen, Elizabeth I; far more Puritan Roundheads settled in frigid New England. Yet the legend of Virginia’s Cavalier heritage, reinforced by the century-long struggle between North and South over slavery and states’ rights, would prove potent as a formative cultural influence among its children, whether at home or abroad.
One result was inflated collective pride, as expressed by the lineage society the Order of the First Families of Virginia (FFV), a state version of the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR) or the Sons of the American Revolution (SAR). The full myth went beyond the Cavalier-Roundhead distinction, however. More legitimately, it also drew on the critical role of Virginia in the events leading to the Revolution, and on the fame of its revolutionary sons—Washington, Jefferson, Madison—in the creation of the early republic. For George’s family the esteemed forebear was John Marshall, the fourth chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, who established judicial supremacy as the cornerstone of American constitutional practice.
Though at best a distant, “collateral” relation, the famous jurist loomed large in Marshall’s family lore. George Catlett Senior revered John Marshall and treasured his connection to the chief justice. However, as a boy his younger son never had much use for the puffed-up family pride that infused his father. In fact he believed that “continual harping on the name of John Marshall was a kind of poor business.”1 George at one point offended his father when, thumbing through a history of the Marshall family, he fastened on the pirate Blackbeard, husband of one of the ancestral Marshall women, as the only interesting character in the work, and boasted to his classmates about his raffish forebear.
But if indifferent to his own pedigree, George was susceptible to the Virginia myth as a force for molding character and personality. In reality, from the outset, the settlers of colonial Virginia and their descendants enjoyed a mixed reputation, one that included proclivities for hard drinking, boisterous sports, reckless gambling, and heedless extravagance. But at its best the ideal of “Virginian” shaped a code of values and behavior that appended pride with honor, grace, and integrity that George somehow absorbed on the road to adulthood. Among those who seriously practiced what they preached, it included a love of place and country, an exalted standard of personal honor and public rectitude, an avoidance of overt self-serving, and a respect for women, children, and the weak. Alas, in George’s case, it also discounted humor. Many people had words of high praise for Marshall over the years, but few ever called him funny. Years later, when he presided over his country’s military operations in the greatest war in history, a colleague in the War Department recalled his manner of giving orders. “He was a demanding man,” an aide, Col. Frank McCarthy, later told an interviewer. “There was nothing except, ‘Take this’ and ‘Do this’ and so on, and ‘Yes sir.’ . . . Never with humor, never with warmth, but with correctness and politeness.”2 Few of the published pictures of Marshall show him with a smile on his face.
For George as a boy the Virginian myth was steeped in the special mystique of George Washington. Close to his Uniontown home was Fort Necessity, where in 1754 the French had defeated the young lieutenant colonel of the Virginia militia sent to oust them during what became a dress rehearsal for the French and Indian War. When George Junior was seven his father took him on a memorable tour of the fort, then in ruins. In 1957, in his first interviews with his biographer Forrest Pogue, Marshall seemed almost obsessed with Washington and his early military exploits. It is not surprising that as he evolved into an adult George would borrow the attributes of his childhood hero and make them his own.
Interestingly, Washington’s own self-creation had foreshadowed George’s. According to his recent biographer Ron Chernow, the Father of His Country “tended his image with extreme care.” He “trained himself to play the gentleman in polite drawing rooms. . . . People sensed something a bit studied about his behavior.”3 Chernow says that Washington’s model was the British aristocracy as he perceived it before the Revolution, but Marshall in his turn learned much of what manhood meant, or should mean, from Washington directly. One telling instance of imitation was Marshall’s devotion to horseback riding. The first president was famous for his superb horsemanship, and it appears likely that Marshall’s almost compulsive attachment to riding was inspired by his great predecessor.
Marshall’s exposure to noble Virginians and their attributes intensified at Virginia Military Institute, where George would receive his military training as a young man. At VMI in Marshall’s day the Civil War victories of Confederate general Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson in the Valley Campaign, at Antietam, and at Fredericksburg remained heroic legends. His classmates at the institute, moreover, were predominantly Southerners, many from the wealthier classes who cherished and emulated the Virginia type. Reinforcement came from that still-more-famous Virginia general, Robert E. Lee, the commander of the Army of Northern Virginia and general in chief of the Confederate army. After the South’s surrender at Appomattox in 1865 Lee had settled in Lexington, adjacent to VMI, to serve as president of Washington College. He was a potent presence, both literally and figuratively, in Marshall’s early manhood.
And then, to further strengthen the Virginia affinity, there was Marshall’s first wife and her family. Lily Coles was descended from a long line of Virginia gentry. Her mother, Elizabeth Childs Pendleton Coles, a member of the FFV whose forebears included a signer of the Declaration of Independence, harped on her ancestry. As Marshall later recalled, she was “a very ardent Virginian” who thought that the name Uniontown “sounded rather common and was rather ashamed of where I came from.”4 Marshall claimed that his mother-in-law’s pretensions amused him, but they could not have failed to reinforce his sense of how important the Virginia connection was in the eyes of many people.* These influences left their deep mark on the later man in the form of a cast of mind, a mode of behavior, a way of relating to others. It showed in his taciturnity, social reticence, and even in his notably erect posture and stiff physical bearing. However they may have questioned his military judgment or his intellectual prowess, virtually no one who knew him doubted Marshall’s elevated character. Gen. Alan Brooke, chief of the Imperial General Staff, who for more than four years during World War II was Marshall’s British counterpart and frequent opponent, invariably scorned the American general’s strategic grasp. But never his character. In a radio broadcast in 1958 Lord Alanbrooke—as he was by then known—though still no fan of Marshall’s generalship, described the American as “amongst the biggest gentlemen . . . that I’ve ever met. [He had] a sense of extraordinary integrity. One could trust him with anything. . . . He treated his inferiors almost the same as his peers.”5 Nor was Brooke alone in his admiration. One of Marshall’s staff during World War II, Gen. Frederick Osborn, whose rich and influential New Jersey family had known a half dozen presidents and other distinguished men, later claimed that none of them compared to Marshall in strength of character. “I never had any . . . impression from any of them as I always had of General Marshall. I had always the sense that I was in the presence of a man who was altogether my superior . . . in his tremendous control over himself, and in his tremendous determination. When he came to the conclusion that something should be done, he said it with such firmness and with such lucidity that you just agreed with him. You knew he was right.”6
However acquired—whether inherent or contrived—Marshall’s austere persona was undoubtedly useful. It reassured many of those with whom he had important transactions—his British allies, newspaper reporters, members of Congress, the president of the United States, the American public—and often resolved their doubts on thorny and controversial issues. It also protected Marshall from his enemies. During his years of power and prominence Marshall would make mistakes, some serious; his performance as a decision maker, as we shall see, was not always stellar. But seldom did his critics penetrate the shield of his reputation. Almost invariably he survived without serious damage. To the end the carpers would be dismissed as bigots and extremists by the conventional thinkers, as many were; in the eyes of most informed midrange Americans he would remain a great man.
A qualifier is in order here: The full array of these personal qualities remained buried in the struggling junior officer, as indeed they could not fail to be, not becoming fully manifest until Marshall attained high rank.
But George belonged to two worlds. In contrast to this tradition and these values was the reality of his early life. He was born in a Pennsylvania town of some five thousand, fifty miles southwest of smoky industrial Pittsburgh. Uniontown was located on the old National Road built by the federal government in the early nineteenth century before the railroads, to provide connections between the Atlantic coast and the nation’s trans-Appalachian interior. The road was a monument to enterprise, and this is where his ancestor-proud father had come in the early 1870s to make his fortune. Besides its importance as a transportation hub the town abutted the famous Connellsville coalfield, the site of some of the best “coking coal” in the world. Here Henry Clay Frick constructed his banks of earth-covered “beehive” ovens to create the coke that fed the new Bessemer converters making cheap steel. At about the time of Marshall’s birth Frick became an executive in the thriving steel business run by the Scottish immigrant Andrew Carnegie, eventually becoming one of the richest industrialists of his day.
George’s father never attained the eminence of Frick. But for a time he was an affluent coke baron, with wide-ranging commercial and real estate interests. Following the collapse of a Virginia land development venture in 1890, his fortunes waned and the family struggled to stay solvent, but George Senior never ceased to be a man of business, a part of the great industrial surge of America’s Gilded Age.
On the other hand, in Marshall’s youth Uniontown retained most of its rural roots, and the general never lost his attachment to country life. In his account of his childhood taped for Forrest Pogue, he described with affection the bucolic pleasures of turn-of-the-century western Pennsylvania. George remembered how much he enjoyed working on the prosperous farm of his friend Andy’s grandfather, and how he was not above getting down to earthy agricultural basics. He helped, he recalled, to “distribute the manure on the parts of the land [that] needed refreshment.” George retained his affection for farming and the natural landscape. He deeply regretted the destruction wrought on the land by industrialization. When he saw the farm again in the mid-1950s, he noted “it had been ruined by the coal veins being taken out from under it.”7 He also recalled the arrival of the railroad in Uniontown as a blight on the town—the source of periodic floods, soot-filled air, and grimy black surfaces.
And yet, pointing again to his two worlds, as a schoolboy he was inspired as much by profit and enterprise as by the Arcadian activities of the remaining unspoiled Pennsylvania countryside. An observer of his boyhood activities might have sworn that he was destined for success in the world of business. At one point he and his buddy Andy established a hand-poled ferry that crossed a small stream, for which they charged a toll. The boys printed up tickets for their ferry on a toy typewriter and sold them to the local girls. One day in midstream the girls decided that they would not pay their pennies. In retaliation “Captain” Marshall pulled the boat’s cork plug, sinking it in the shallow water while the passengers screamed in dismay. George and his friend also raised tomatoes on the site of an old barn where the soil, enriched by years of animal waste, produced giant fruit. The local grocer snapped these up eagerly for pennies until the boys, advised by George Senior, insisted on getting more money for their labor. At this point the grocer refused to buy any more.
Whether agrarian or commercial, life in Uniontown in the last decades of the nineteenth century was insular. His environment made George acutely conscious of the local past. Within a few miles of town, besides the remains of Fort Necessity, was the grave of British general James Braddock, who had died leading a failed military expedition to annul Washington’s earlier defeat by the French. The battles and campaigns of the Civil War, moreover, were still part of living memory in the Uniontown area when George was growing up. But his intellectual environment included little about the great contemporary world outside his corner of Pennsylvania. By his own admission, George’s early education was seriously deficient. He attended private elementary schools run by local gentlewomen, but apparently he learned little there beyond the most basic skills, and when his father entered him in the local public school the admitting officer was dismayed at the boy’s inability to answer simple factual questions. There is no evidence that George the boy knew much about Europe, Asia, or Africa, places that would loom large on his later military and diplomatic world stage. Nor did his reading expand his horizons by much. It can be argued that few Americans of that day, adults included, knew much more. Still, George’s background was not equal to that of a contemporary boy in large port cities like New York, Boston, New Orleans, or San Francisco, who might have absorbed through his pores, as it were, considerable knowledge of the wider world.
There is little evidence that George’s formal higher education expanded his horizons very much either. What it did do was reinforce the aloof, Olympian “Virginia” persona he would inhabit in his adult life.
As he reached his midteens George, like other middle-class boys, faced the prospect of training for a profession. Unfortunately he had limited options. With his deficient school record he was not suited to the “learned professions.” Temperamentally he was not fit for a life behind a desk or a counter. (He would always despise the work environment his career would actually impose on him.) What about the army? As a lad from a semirural environment, active in fishing, hunting, and camping, the life of a soldier must have seemed congenial. There was also the inspiration of Washington, Jackson, and Lee. But there remains a puzzle. The military life was not widely esteemed in 1890s America. Disrespected, the army was small and poorly funded. In that decade it was a shadow of the proud and powerful Grand Army of the Republic that had paraded down the capital’s Pennsylvania Avenue at the great victory review in May 1865. In 1897, the year of George’s admission to VMI, the U.S. Army budget was $35.3 million out of a total federal budget of $366 million. The army consisted of fewer than thirty thousand men scattered across the Western frontier primarily to keep the restless Indian tribes on their reservations. The rank and file was largely composed of the castoffs of society, men who could not compete in civilian life. As the New York Sun noted in March 1888, “The regular army is composed of bummers, loafers, and foreign paupers.” The lives of these soldiers were hard. A new enlisted man received only thirteen dollars a month (though he was also fed, clothed, and sheltered). With discipline harsh and workloads heavy, personnel turnover was high, often 25 to 40 percent a year in some units. Officers’ circumstances were not much better. A second lieutenant’s pay was fourteen hundred dollars a year, from which he had to buy his own uniforms and many other personal items to make his life comfortable on post. Worst of all, promotion was snail-like. Many officers were in their forties before reaching the rank of captain.
George’s father was fully aware of the drawbacks of the military as a career. His older son, Stuart, had already attended VMI, but he had majored in chemistry and after graduation found work as an industrial chemist, an acceptable vocation. But however skeptical, George Senior sought to get his younger son a place at West Point, where he could receive a free education at the United States government’s expense. But a placement at the U.S. military academy required a recommendation by the aspirant’s local member of Congress. George Senior, a lifelong Democrat, had little influence with the district’s Republican representative, and George Junior was not admitted to the prestigious academy. VMI was the next best thing. Stuart, however, did not want his cutup, ill-educated kid brother to go to his alma mater. He would disgrace the family name, he told their mother. George overheard Stuart’s remarks and was enraged. It “made more an impression on me than all the instructors, parental pressures or anything else, and I decided right then I was going to ‘wipe his face’ as we say or ‘wipe his eye’ and I ended up at the VMI.” This eruption of sibling rivalry, George later claimed, not only propelled him into VMI; it fueled his drive to excel for the rest of his career.8 It was just as well that George failed to get into West Point. He probably would have flunked out academically: George had not yet learned how to study.
In the end it proved easy to get George into the freshman class at VMI despite his unimpressive school record. The institute required no entrance exam. The only hurdle to admission was Superintendent Scott Shipp, a former Confederate general who respected the distinguished Marshall ancestry as much as George’s father did and simply admitted the young Pennsylvanian on sight.
Founded in 1839 in Lexington, Virginia, at the site of a former state arsenal, VMI had graduated its first class of sixteen cadets in 1842. Thereafter, during the antebellum years, it played a minor role in the Old South’s system of higher education. Not until the Civil War would its graduates make their mark on Southern life. There was one exception. During the 1850s the professor of “Natural and Experimental Philosophy” was Thomas Jonathan Jackson, a West Pointer and a veteran of the Mexican War, who later, as a Confederate general, would acquire the nickname “Stonewall.” A notoriously poor teacher while there, Professor Jackson’s memory would be revered at the institute in later years.
VMI indelibly etched one side of George’s life and personality. The institute’s collective culture and atmosphere were decidedly Southern through the nineteenth century. Besides the Jackson connection, during the Civil War, VMI cadets fought in fourteen battlefield engagements wearing Confederate gray. Fifteen of its graduates rose to the rank of general in the Confederate army. In May 1864 VMI cadets fought as a unit in the Battle of New Market. Ranging in age from fifteen to twenty-four, the cadets suffered ten killed and forty-two wounded, but they captured a Union artillery emplacement and helped turn the tide of battle. After Appomattox the memory of the “Baby Corps” and the South’s “Lost Cause” in general permeated the school’s atmosphere. The Confederate association was fortified, as we saw, by the veneration of Robert E. Lee, general in chief of the Confederate army. After the general’s death his presence was felt through Lee Chapel at the college, which housed his remains.
Lee was more than a respected former soldier. Son of a Revolutionary War general and former governor of Virginia, like Washington he embodied all those qualities—integrity, honor, dignity, breeding, generosity—associated with the Virginia elite. Marshall later acknowledged that he had been “greatly influenced by the traditions concerning General Lee and General Jackson.” He had gone “to frequent services in the Washington and Lee chapel” and had often reflected on the traditions that these men represented.9 In Marshall’s day VMI was unself-conscious about announcing its mission to fashion Southern gentlemen. Superintendent Shipp, who had actually led the brave VMI cadets at New Market, caught the spirit of the institute in his 1901 report. School life, he wrote, should emphasize “habits of obedience, self-denial, and self-restraint.” It should encourage “respect for lawful authority and to that self-respect which the consciousness of duty well done carries with it.”10
As a Yankee, George stood out. He was one of fourteen Northerners in a freshman class of eighty-two. Taunted for his Pennsylvania accent, he modified it to conform to his peers’ way of speaking. He also revised other ingrained habits. The four years at VMI suppressed the bumptious Tom Sawyer in George and helped mold him into a gentleman imbued with dignity and the spirit of noblesse oblige.
VMI’s coursework was not demanding, yet even so Marshall absorbed only a modest amount of what was offered. He considered a complete waste the time he spent there learning French and German, two languages that he could have used profitably in later years. He also regretted that his instructors had never taught him how to express himself well either orally or in writing. “What I learned most at the V.M.I.,” he later said, “was self-control, discipline, so it was ground in.”11 His academic failings did not affect his standing among the leading voices in the cadet corps, however, for what he lacked in intellectual achievement he made up in strength of character, however acquired.
Besides indoctrination, VMI’s character-molding ends were abetted by a system that subjected its freshman class—the “Rats”—to a brutal hazing regime. The institute forbade inflicting bodily harm on the novices, but promoted the “Rat Line,” which it admitted was “among the toughest and most grueling initiation programs in the country.”12 Under it freshmen were expected to walk a prescribed straight line—the Rat Line—when moving in barracks from place to place, all the while with shoulders held stiffly back and heads up in an exaggerated sort of mobile “at attention.” Rats were subject to verbal abuse from upperclassmen who could also impose on them humiliating and arduous physical penalties—exhausting push-ups and the like—for supposed infractions of rules or slippage of proper demeanor. One former Rat recalled the cruel rituals of his first week at VMI with revulsion. He and a group of fellow freshmen were subjected to a “Sweat Party”; the freshmen were crammed into a shower stall wearing their fatigues and raincoats and ordered to run in place and perform push-ups until they were drenched in perspiration. Then the upperclassmen turned on scalding water, ostensibly to wash the sweat off the exhausted freshmen. On one occasion at the end of this ordeal, an upperclassman taunted the novices: “Well, rats, what do you think of Friday nights at your new school?”13
The Sweat Party account describes a Rat Line experience almost half a century after Marshall’s years at VMI. No authorized explanation of the purpose of the freshman hazing system survives from Marshall’s time at VMI. But it was widely believed that by the mid-twentieth century the system had been moderated, not intensified. In any case, in 1897 freshman George felt its sting literally. One of the most appalling aspects of the Rat Line routine was its capriciousness. Upperclassmen were indeed forbidden to inflict bodily harm, but almost anything could pass muster if perpetrated out of sight of the faculty and administrators. Tall, skinny George, with his Pittsburgh twang, was a natural target for the sadists, and at one point he was ordered by some upperclassmen, as a test of physical stamina, to squat over a naked bayonet fixed point up in the ground. George had just arrived at the institute weakened by a bout of typhoid fever and soon slipped from his position, barely missing a serious wound to his buttocks if not to more vital parts of his anatomy. He might have reported the upperclassmen for their extreme punishment, but to their great relief he chose not to. In the end, then, the event elicited the respect of the cadet body for Marshall as a coolheaded, gutsy young man.
In addition to the Rat Line, VMI stood out from other schools for its strict honor system. At the institute doors were left unlocked. Exams were unproctored. Students attested in writing to the authenticity of all submitted papers and reports, and that was enough. Cadets were not only expected to abide by the rules; they were expected to report strictly all violations of the rules. Failure to do so was itself a violation, and like other infractions of the code resulted in immediate dismissal from the institute.
And then, as a further character builder, there was the overall austerity of cadet life. Wake-up call was in the very early morning, a requirement that George despised. Food was atrocious. The main dish at mess, Marshall recalled, was “growlie,” a concoction of “most anything . . . that was around . . . handy to dump into it.” There was little time off: just “part of a day here and part of a day there.” Moreover, “there were . . . no arrangements practically to amuse the cadets . . . . It was pretty much a case of looking after yourself and the old cadets chasing you.”14 Marshall would remember this recreation deficiency and as chief of staff would seek to alleviate it in the World War II citizen army.
It is not entirely clear how George managed in his senior year to become first captain, the place of highest honor in the VMI cadet corps. The process required recommendations from the four cadet senior captains, and from the institute’s tactical instructors, as well as the school adjutant and school quartermaster. How did George secure these accolades? Perhaps his stoicism and reticence on the occasion of the bayonet mishap contributed to the favorable response of the top cadets, But clearly he had also captured the attention of the faculty and administrators by his diligence, which had already won him the rank of first sergeant. He had worked very hard at this secondary post to win the favor of his peers and his superiors. “As first sergeant. I fell the company in, called the roll, kept tabs on it, and marched the detail to guard mount every morning,” he later recalled.15 These were routine duties of the first sergeant, but George performed them so well—with commanding posture and a bullhorn voice—that it deeply impressed the cadets.
As first captain George’s performance was equally notable. The cadets inevitably tested his mettle, and he proved equal to the job. He accepted their challenges, sternly responding without losing their goodwill and respect. It was at this point in his career, apparently, that he adopted the cool, aloof persona that later set him apart from many other army officers. “What I learned at the V.M.I.,” he later declared, “was self-control, discipline, so it was ground in, and the problem of managing men which fell to the cadet noncommissioned officer and cadet officer.”16
While still a cadet, Marshall managed to find a wife. His choice fell on Elizabeth Carter Coles, called “Lily,” a red-haired, fair-skinned beauty six years his senior. As we noted, Lily came from an old Virginia family that was inordinately proud of its connections with the Old Dominion’s glorious past. A cultivated young woman with a heart condition, she lived with her widowed mother in Lexington, in a house near the institute’s outer gate. George knew of Lily through his brother, Stuart, who had courted her for a time while he attended VMI, but it was when he stopped outside her house one evening in his senior year to listen to her play the piano—pieces his mother had played—that she truly captured his heart. Lily found the lanky cadet to her liking as well. Though still a student, with uncertain prospects, he was intelligent, well mannered, and devoted. Besides, she was already twenty-seven, in those days perilously close to spinsterhood, and with a heart condition at that, and could not hold out for a “brilliant” match to a rich, settled man. Though she would probably be fated, as an army wife, to spend years in remote, primitive Western “forts” and “camps” the match was still appealing. She and the first captain were soon seeing much of each other. The courting process required George to violate VMI rules. He often left the institute barracks and grounds after hours to see her, though if caught, he might have been expelled from school.
In the normal course of events Lily and George might have chosen to marry when he graduated. But even after the VMI commencement ceremonies George’s future remained uncertain. Unlike graduates of West Point, those from VMI were not automatically commissioned as army officers. In fact, though a military school, VMI did not send many of its graduates into military service. In 1890 only ten VMI graduates were officers in the regular army. Of the 122 young men who started the class of 1901, only six became professional soldiers. VMI graduate Marshall was, then, faced with the prospect of winning a commission and beginning a military career against serious odds.
Fortunately 1901 was an auspicious year for a young man to begin the long upward climb in the U.S. Army. Though long ignored, the army’s deficiencies had been exposed by the Spanish-American War. The United States had won that “Splendid Little War” against a feeble, decayed European empire, but the army’s performance had been disappointing, marked by inefficiency, poor training, corruption, and incompetence. Too small to fight a European nation possessing superior arms and tactics, it had relied on volunteers, including most famously Theodore Roosevelt’s Rough Riders. The logistic conduct of the war was worse than the actual fighting. The War Department chose the small city of Tampa, Florida, as the assembly point for the invasion of Cuba. The town lacked proper rail and port facilities. Freight cars carrying troops, munitions, and military supplies were soon backed up on sidings as far north as Columbia, South Carolina. Meanwhile, officers fought one another for ship space to assure their units were not left behind and arrived late in Cuba, at the scene of fighting. The provision of food, clothing, tents, weapons, and medical supplies was mishandled. Men wore woolen uniforms in the tropical heat; ate tasteless, stringy canned beef; and fought with outdated Springfield rifles. They died in droves of yellow fever, malaria, dysentery, and other diseases.
Had precedent been followed. peace would have encouraged Americans to return to their miserly, neglectful prewar military policies. But Marshall was lucky. Despite the incompetence, victory after scarcely 150 fighting days brought the United States a small overseas empire including Puerto Rico in the Caribbean and the Philippines, the large, diverse archipelago off the East Asian coast. Most Americans saw their acquisition of colonies as a liberation of the “little brown brothers” from European oppression. They were rudely awakened when in East Asia local Filipino nationalists rose up against the American successors to the defeated Spaniards. The force authorized in the wake of the “Philippine Insurrection” more than doubled the size of the former peacetime army. Obviously the expansion created the need for new officers, greatly improving Marshall’s immediate chances for a commission.
And there was more. After the scandalous wartime failures came a cascade of military reforms that would deeply affect Marshall’s future career. Pushed by the new secretary of war, the New York lawyer Elihu Root, successor to the bungling Russell Alger, the changes ended the confusing division of military authority between the secretary of war and his bureau subordinates and the commanding general of the army by creating the post of chief of staff. The new chief would serve as top military adviser to the president and, under the secretary, would in effect reign as the uniformed head of the army. Under him, in turn, would be a new general staff to prepare plans for future military contingencies. To upgrade old-fashioned officer training, Root also created a number of schools for various broad divisions of the army such as the infantry, field artillery, cavalry, engineers, and medical corps. Serving to round out the new reeducation institutions would be the Army War College.
Yet another of Root’s changes, reform of the National Guard, would impinge on Marshall’s career. The antique state militia system, composed of part-time local volunteers, which had served—and often misserved—the nation since colonial times when dangers threatened, was inadequate. It was underfunded, its officers were often untrained political appointees, and its rank and file was composed of men interested largely in camaraderie and boozy good cheer. It was better known as a strikebreaking device than a military organization. Under Root’s reforms the inept guard would be subject to new standards; Guard units would now be instructed by regular army officers; guard officers would have to pass federal examinations; guardsmen would participate with regulars on military training maneuvers.
These postwar changes undoubtedly offered new opportunities for aspiring officers, but how was the fledgling VMI graduate, without West Point credentials or family military connections, to qualify for the required second lieutenants’ exam? Happily a combination of George Senior’s string pulling, the new graduate’s own enterprise, and sheer good luck got George on the applicants’ exam list. In late September he came to New York for three days of tests. These were pitched at so low a level that a diligent high school student could have passed. But George could not be sure of his success, and he returned to his summer appointment as an instructor at Danville Military Institute, a Virginia secondary school, seriously worried about the results.
On October 8 the examining board issued its report. Marshall had passed with a score of 84 and was judged “well qualified for the position of a commissioned officer in the United States Army.”17 In fact Marshall had done so well that he would be eligible for service in the artillery, a competitive branch considered more desirable than the infantry.
Marshall resigned from his job at Danville and returned to Uniontown to await orders. Just after the New Year he received them. To his surprise they were for service in the infantry. Apparently no vacancies existed in the artillery for second lieutenants, and Marshall would be assigned to the Thirtieth Infantry Regiment, stationed in the Philippines. Though his posting was a disappointment, Marshall submitted his signed oath of office on February 3.
A week later Lily and George were married in a simple ceremony at the Coleses’ home in Lexington, with the bride’s brother standing in for Lily’s deceased father. The next morning the married couple took the train to Washington for what they assumed would be a one-day honeymoon before George would have to report to Fort Myer. He would then depart immediately for early transport to the Philippines. Happily, when George appeared at the War Department, a compassionate officer noted his recent marriage and took pity on the newlywed. He could delay his departure for five extra days, he was told.
Army rules did not allow the wives of junior officers to accompany their husbands to their posts. But even if they had, Lily’s uncertain health would have precluded it. All of six days, then, would be the extent of George and Lily’s “wedded bliss” for two years. Meanwhile, the new bride returned to her mother’s house in Lexington while George entrained west to the Presidio in San Francisco. In mid-April he took ship aboard the Kilpatrick sailing for Manila and the new American colony across the Pacific. He was about to begin his life as an officer in the U.S. Army.