Log In
Or create an account ->
Imperial Library
Home
About
News
Upload
Forum
Help
Login/SignUp
Index
Chapter One
Introduction
The Purpose of This Book
A Brief Biography of Craig
The Purpose of Craig’s Arguments
The Structure of This Book
A Note to the Reader
Chapter Two
The Kalam Cosmological Argument
Overview of The Argument
Premise One: Time is Tensed
The Inelimibility of Tense from Language Implies the Reality of Tense
Our Direct Experience of Time Shows That it is Tensed
Relativity Does Not Undermine Tensed Theories of Time
The Tenseless Theory of Time Leads to Absurd Conclusions
Summary
Premise Two: The Universe Began to Exist
An Actual Infinite is Impossible
The Impossibility of Forming an Infinite by Successive Addition
There is Powerful Empirical Evidence for a Beginning of the Universe
Summary
Premise Three: Everything That Begins to Exist Has a Cause
That Nothing Comes from Nothing is a Basic Metaphysical Principle
If Universes Could Come from Nothing Then So Could Anything
We Have Strong Evidence in Favour of This Principle
Premise Four: If the Universe Had a Cause, That Cause Must be Personal
There Are No Other Plausible Candidates
Free Agency is the Only Way for Change to Come from Changelessness
Summary of the Argument
Chapter Three
The Fine-Tuning Argument
Overview of the Argument
Premise One: The Universe is Fine-Tuned for Intelligent Life
The Evidence for Fine-Tuning
The Possibility of Other Forms of Life
Examining Martin Rees’ Six Numbers
The Dimensionality Problem
The Representativeness Problem
Premise Two: The Explanation of Fine-Tuning is Either Chance, Necessity, or Design
Premise Three: Chance and Physical Necessity are not Plausible Explanations
Chance as an Explanation
Physical Necessity as an Explanation
Summary of the Argument
Chapter Four
The Moral Argument
Overview of the Argument
Premise One: Moral Facts Require Grounding
Premise Two: Objective Moral Facts Exist
Cognitivism and Non-Cognitivism
Relativism and Universalism
Craig’s Mutually-Conflicting Arguments
Possible Defeaters of Our Moral Experience
Premise Three: God Provides a Foundation for Moral Facts
God’s Nature as the Basis of Morality
The Euthyphro Dilemma
The Challenge of Ideal Observer Theory
Premise Four: There is No Non-Theistic Grounding for Moral Facts
Non-Theistic Theories of Morality
Humanity is Small and Ephemeral
Humans as Mere Animals
Morality and Free Will
Atheism and Moral Duties
Reductive Moral Naturalism
Explanatory Stopping Points
Summary of the Argument
Chapter Five
The Christological Argument
Overview of the Argument
The Structure of Craig’s Argument
Criteria for Judging an Explanation
The Four Historical Facts
The RHBS Hypothesis
Overview of the Hypothesis
Postulate One: Removal of the Body
Postulate Two: Private Hallucinatory Experiences
Postulate Three: Collective Religious Experiences
Postulate Four: Cognitive, Memory, and Social Biases
Explanatory Scope and Power of the Postulates
The Resurrection Hypothesis
Overview of the Hypothesis
Postulate One: God Exists
Postulate Two: God Desired to Raise Jesus
Postulate Three: Jesus Desired to Appear to his Followers
Explanatory Scope and Power of the Postulates
Summary of the Argument
Chapter Six
Other Arguments
The Leibnizian Cosmological Argument
The Ontological Argument
The Argument from Intentionality
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics
Chapter Seven
Conclusions
An Overall Evaluation of Craig’s Arguments
What Should We Believe?
Bibliography
Endnotes
← Prev
Back
Next →
← Prev
Back
Next →