Log In
Or create an account -> 
Imperial Library
  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Upload
  • Forum
  • Help
  • Login/SignUp

Index
Chapter One Introduction
The Purpose of This Book A Brief Biography of Craig The Purpose of Craig’s Arguments The Structure of This Book A Note to the Reader
Chapter Two The Kalam Cosmological Argument
Overview of The Argument Premise One: Time is Tensed
The Inelimibility of Tense from Language Implies the Reality of Tense Our Direct Experience of Time Shows That it is Tensed Relativity Does Not Undermine Tensed Theories of Time The Tenseless Theory of Time Leads to Absurd Conclusions Summary
Premise Two: The Universe Began to Exist
An Actual Infinite is Impossible The Impossibility of Forming an Infinite by Successive Addition There is Powerful Empirical Evidence for a Beginning of the Universe Summary
Premise Three: Everything That Begins to Exist Has a Cause
That Nothing Comes from Nothing is a Basic Metaphysical Principle If Universes Could Come from Nothing Then So Could Anything We Have Strong Evidence in Favour of This Principle
Premise Four: If the Universe Had a Cause, That Cause Must be Personal
There Are No Other Plausible Candidates Free Agency is the Only Way for Change to Come from Changelessness
Summary of the Argument
Chapter Three The Fine-Tuning Argument
Overview of the Argument Premise One: The Universe is Fine-Tuned for Intelligent Life
The Evidence for Fine-Tuning The Possibility of Other Forms of Life Examining Martin Rees’ Six Numbers The Dimensionality Problem The Representativeness Problem
Premise Two: The Explanation of Fine-Tuning is Either Chance, Necessity, or Design Premise Three: Chance and Physical Necessity are not Plausible Explanations
Chance as an Explanation Physical Necessity as an Explanation
Summary of the Argument
Chapter Four The Moral Argument
Overview of the Argument Premise One: Moral Facts Require Grounding Premise Two: Objective Moral Facts Exist
Cognitivism and Non-Cognitivism Relativism and Universalism Craig’s Mutually-Conflicting Arguments Possible Defeaters of Our Moral Experience
Premise Three: God Provides a Foundation for Moral Facts
God’s Nature as the Basis of Morality The Euthyphro Dilemma The Challenge of Ideal Observer Theory
Premise Four: There is No Non-Theistic Grounding for Moral Facts
Non-Theistic Theories of Morality Humanity is Small and Ephemeral Humans as Mere Animals Morality and Free Will Atheism and Moral Duties Reductive Moral Naturalism Explanatory Stopping Points
Summary of the Argument
Chapter Five The Christological Argument
Overview of the Argument
The Structure of Craig’s Argument Criteria for Judging an Explanation The Four Historical Facts
The RHBS Hypothesis
Overview of the Hypothesis Postulate One: Removal of the Body Postulate Two: Private Hallucinatory Experiences Postulate Three: Collective Religious Experiences Postulate Four: Cognitive, Memory, and Social Biases Explanatory Scope and Power of the Postulates
The Resurrection Hypothesis
Overview of the Hypothesis Postulate One: God Exists Postulate Two: God Desired to Raise Jesus Postulate Three: Jesus Desired to Appear to his Followers Explanatory Scope and Power of the Postulates
Summary of the Argument
Chapter Six Other Arguments
The Leibnizian Cosmological Argument The Ontological Argument The Argument from Intentionality The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics
Chapter Seven Conclusions
An Overall Evaluation of Craig’s Arguments What Should We Believe?
Bibliography Endnotes
  • ← Prev
  • Back
  • Next →
  • ← Prev
  • Back
  • Next →

Chief Librarian: Las Zenow <zenow@riseup.net>
Fork the source code from gitlab
.

This is a mirror of the Tor onion service:
http://kx5thpx2olielkihfyo4jgjqfb7zx7wxr3sd4xzt26ochei4m6f7tayd.onion