Log In
Or create an account ->
Imperial Library
Home
About
News
Upload
Forum
Help
Login/SignUp
Index
Cover
Half-title
Title
Copyright
Contents
Figures
Tables
Notes on the contributors
1 Capital punishment: improve it or remove it?
Review of the debate: the usual suspects
The moratorium movement: progress or procrastination?
Deterrence
Judge/jury sentencing in capital trials
Wrongful conviction and execution of the innocent
Racial discrimination
Juvenile executions
The mentally impaired and the mentally ill
Public opinion versus public education
The Council of Europe, the European Union and the United Nations
The European Convention on Human Rights and the origins of the death penalty debate
Abolition in Europe
Enigmatic Asia
The Philippines
Taiwan: preparing for abolition
China
Summary
2 International law and the death penalty: reflecting or promoting change?
Does international law prohibit capital punishment?
Crimes subject to the death penalty
Reintroduction of the death penalty
Fair trial guarantees and the death penalty
The ‘death row phenomenon’
Protected categories
Method of execution
Conclusions
3 Doctors and the death penalty: ethics and a cruel punishment
Introduction
Development of ethics against professional participation
Physicians
Psychiatrists
Nurses
Developments in the 1990s
Mental health and the death penalty
Professional ethics
Legal action by health professionals
Issues of further concern
Continuing practice of executing those with learning disabilities
Spread of lethal injection and potential for wider medicalisation of executions
Limited detail on medical/psychiatric participation in capital punishment around the world
Potential rupture between law and ethics
Maintaining medical ethics by the displacement of the medical role onto other health professionals or technicians
Conclusion
4 Replacing the death penalty: the vexed issue of alternative sanctions
Introduction
Rethinking how we deal with serious offenders: what are the alternatives?
Life imprisonment
History of the life sentence
Which crimes call for the life sentence
Mandatory and discretionary life sentences
Authority for release
Life imprisonment without the possibility of parole
The whole-life sentence in England and Wales
Natural life in the United States
Consequences of whole-life sentences
Long fixed prison sentences
Making the transition: overcoming resistance to abolition
The costs of long-term imprisonment
Regimes and programmes for life sentence prisoners
International standards for the treatment of long-term prisoners
Initial planning after sentence
Work, education and other activities
Contacts with family and the outside world
Progress through the system
Difficult and disruptive prisoners
Conclusions
5 Religion and the death penalty in the United States: past and present
Early efforts at abolition
Post-Second World War developments
The Furman decision
The conversion of the Roman Catholic Church
Revival of capital punishment in the 1980s
Into the 1990s
Shift in momentum in the late 1990s
Concluding observations
6 On botched executions
Introduction
Methods
Findings
Patterns of botched executions
An instantaneous, painless and non-lingering death?
Conclusions
Appendix 1 Descriptions of botched executions
7 Death as a penalty in the Shari’a
Crimes and penalties in the Shari’a
Hudud crimes
Qesas crimes
Ta’azir crimes
Repentance as a bar to punishment
Conclusion
8 Abolishing the death penalty in the United States: an analysis of institutional obstacles and future prospects
Prison guards and officials
Prosecutors
Trial juries
Trial judges
Appellate courts
Chief executives
Legislatures
Law enforcement personnel
Murder victims’ families
The Bar
Political parties
Medical profession
Academic organisations
Religious denominations
Civil liberties and civil right groups
The media
Labour unions
International human rights organisations
The general public
A moratorium strategy
Conclusion
9 Capital punishment in the United States: moratorium efforts and other key developments
Introduction
The increasing unfairness of the death penalty as implemented in the United States
Counsel
Incomprehensible or misleading jury instructions
'Automatic death penalty’ jurors involved in imposing sentence
Geographic and racial inconsistencies in imposing the death sentence
Failure to consider clemency seriously, even in egregious cases
Increasing threats to judicial independence
Increasing public awareness of systemic unfairness in death penalty implementation
The egregious arbitrariness, capriciousness and unfairness of the capital punishment system, even aside from innocence issues
Increased international judicial, diplomatic and business criticism of the United States’ unfair implementation of capital punishment
Increasing criticism of death penalty implementation and support for moratoriums, and Governor Ryan’s clemencies for all Illinois death row inmates
Conclusion
10 The experience of Lithuania’s journey to abolition
Introduction
The problem of the death penalty in Lithuania after the re-establishment of independence
Opinion polls on the death penalty
Description of the survey
Analysis of the results
Raising public awareness of death penalty issues
Concluding comments
11 The death penalty in South Korea and Japan: ‘Asian values’ and the debate about capital punishment?
Introduction
South Korea: from retentionist to de facto abolitionist?
Japan: judicial attempts to restrict the use of the death penalty
The issue of public opinion
Conclusion
12 Georgia, former republic of the USSR: managing abolition
13 Capital punishment in the Commonwealth Caribbean: colonial inheritance, colonial remedy?
The capital punishment process in the Caribbean
Constitutional arguments
Mandatory death penalty
Hanging: mediaeval barbarity or lawful punishment?
Executions in the modern era in the Caribbean
‘Evolving standards of decency’: the constitutional jurisprudence of the Privy Council in capital cases
Delay and ‘the phenomena of alternating hope and despair’
‘Barbarous regimes’: prison conditions in the Caribbean
‘Some people in Costa Rica’: the effect of decisions of international human rights bodies in domestic law
No apology for Mr Reckley: the justiciability of the prerogative of mercy
Responses by states to the Privy Council and the future of the death penalty in the Caribbean
The Caribbean Court of Justice
Legislative amendments
Signs of hope
14 Public opinion and the death penalty
What is public opinion?
Measuring public opinion?
Public opinion polls
Legislative behaviour
Executive behaviour
International law and practice
Juries
Human rights law and public opinion
Conclusion
15 Capital punishment: meeting the needs of the families of the homicide victim and the condemned
Crime victim issues in the UK
Victims and capital punishment: the US
Victim-driven criminal justice
Victim impact statements
Victim offender mediation/dialogue (VOM/D)
Execution witness programme
Conclusions
Index
← Prev
Back
Next →
← Prev
Back
Next →