Log In
Or create an account -> 
Imperial Library
  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Upload
  • Forum
  • Help
  • Login/SignUp

Index
1. Introduction, 3 2. Classical Antiquity, 3. The Middle Ages, 4. The Renaissance and Beyond: Technology 1500-1750, 5. The Years of Miracles: The Industrial Revolution, 1750-1830, 6. The Later Nineteenth Century: 1830-1914, 7. Understanding Technological Progress, 8. Classical and Medieval Technology, 9. China and Europe, 10. The Industrial Revolution: Britain and Europe, 11. Evolution and the Dynamics of Technological Change, 12. Epilogue, Bibliography, Index, This view of technological change is inconsistent with one of the most pervasive half-truths that ec 2. Commercial expansion. It is the standard fare of intermediate courses in microeconomics to illust The literature produced by modern economists on technological change is vast.' Before we rashly decide that inventions should not be the focus of the study of the economic history Until recently, the consensus on classical civilizations ((',reek, Hellenistic, and Roman) was that What technological progress there was in the classical world, especially in Roman times, served the The Roman Empire, which commanded enormous resources, brought public-good engineering to great hei cribed to the Romans."t The economic significance of' Roman roads should not be exaggerated. The roads that survived deep Another area in which technical ingenuity improved efficiency in the public sector was in the constr A recent discovery that reveals the technical genius of Hellenism is the famous Antikythera mechanis In the private sectors, such as agriculture, textiles, and the use of power and materials, the progr outside the Mediterranean perimeter. The Gauls and other Celtic people improved harvesting equipment engineer Vitruvius, who lived in the second half of the first century B.C., describes a waterwheel i In assessing classical technology, then, it is important not to overemphasize the lack of achievemen 1 Can archaeology shed more light on the issue? Archaeological evidence has demonstrated recently original, and in(luisitive. But it was not particularly technologically creative. It built waterwhee When classical civilization succeeded in creating it novel technique it was often unable or unwillin The essential elements of the agricultural evolution were the introduction of the heavy plow and the it required a team of oxen to pull it.' A second area in which early medieval Europe was successful was energy utilization. Energy takes two the ninth century their use had become common and their economic effects had been felt throughout Eu By increasing the stability and comfort of the ride, the stirrup made the horse an increasingly im The Moslems' most original contribution was in chemical technology. Al Jabir'and Al Razi (known in t tends that it is difficult to discover anything that could be called an enrichment of acquired knowl the water mill and the sail. It, too, may have been imported to Europe by Moslems (from central Asia A third area of progress was metallurgical engineering. Mining and metallurgy were especially highly Of' equal technical brilliance was the weight-driven mechanical clock. Its inventor is unknown, but Another important mechanical idea was the flywheel, which had previously been used only for grindsto Some other useful inventions (late from the thirteenth century. Spectacles were invented around 1285 As noted, by I50(1 Europe was no longer the technological backwater it had been in 900, nor was it t Yet in the two centuries before 1500, Europe's technological creativity had become increasingly or On or immediately below the surface of Europe lay vast supplies of stored-up solar energy in the for nent, including the Principality of Liege in what is today eastern Belgium, coal was used in iron fo most detailed books on mining engineering ever written.' From it we can infer the improvements introduced into mining after 1450. Agricola describes the ma
  • ← Prev
  • Back
  • Next →
  • ← Prev
  • Back
  • Next →

Chief Librarian: Las Zenow <zenow@riseup.net>
Fork the source code from gitlab
.

This is a mirror of the Tor onion service:
http://kx5thpx2olielkihfyo4jgjqfb7zx7wxr3sd4xzt26ochei4m6f7tayd.onion