Log In
Or create an account ->
Imperial Library
Home
About
News
Upload
Forum
Help
Login/SignUp
Index
Cover
Front Matter
1. Introduction
2. The Nature and Effects of Adversarialism: Jury Decision-Making in Sexual Assault Trials
3. Factors That Predict Outcomes in Sexual Assault Trials
4. ‘Commonsense’ or ‘Life Experience’: Jurors’ Perceptions of Guilt
5. ‘No Means Yes and Yes Means Anal’: The Cultural Climate in Which Sex Offences Are Prosecuted
6. The Nature and Effects of Adversarialism: Sites of Activation for Heuristic Reasoning Processes
7. Modernisation of the Substantive Law of Consent
8. Cross-Examination in Sexual Assault Trials: Evidentiary Safeguard or an Opportunity to Confuse?
9. Contemporary Reforms to Cross-Examination
10. The Problems Facing Reformers of the Sexual Assault Trial
11. Achieving Best Evidence for Vulnerable Witnesses: The Use of Trauma-Informed Theory to Reform the Sexual Assault Trial
12. Reform Measures: The Devil Is in the Detail
Back Matter
← Prev
Back
Next →
← Prev
Back
Next →