Log In
Or create an account -> 
Imperial Library
  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Upload
  • Forum
  • Help
  • Login/SignUp

Index
Foreword Eleven Documents of Vital Importance on the Ayodhya Dispute (2) Satyopākhyānam (3) Vishnu-hari inscription
Verse 5. Verse 21. Verse 24.
(4) Joannes De Laet’s book (1631 A.D.) (5) Thomas Herbert’s book (1634 A.D.) (6) Joseph Tieffenthaler’s Account (c.1670 A.D.) (7) French scholar C. Mentelle’s book (1801 A.D.) (8) A Dictionary, Geographical, Statistical and Historical, Vol. 2. (9) Complaint of Syyed Muhammad Khatib dated 30th November, 1858 A.D. [Exhibit 20 (Suit-1)] Gharib Parwar Aadil-e-Zaman Salamat! (10) P. Carnegy’s Writing (1870 A.D.) (11) Ayodhya sanad (8th July, 1723 A.D.) Diacritical Marks used in this book Important historical events of Ayodhyā with religious connotations in the last 1000 years Preface Chapter One Ayodhyā was never an abandoned city Chapter Two Janmabhūmi-māhātmya in the Skanda Purāna, Rudra-yāmala, Satyopākhyāna and Avadha-vilāsa of Lal Das Chapter Three Babur was not a religious fanatic Babur had no role either in the demolition of any temple at Ayodhyā or in the construction of the mosque Inscriptions on the structure were fake and factitious Mir Baqi of inscriptions is a fictitious person different from Bāqī of Bābur-nama Babur never visited Ayodhyā, nor did he ever issue any sanad in favour of the disputed shrine Aurangzeb’s ascendancy to the throne led to the demolition of temples at Ayodhyā How has demolition ghost been haunting Babur A tale of two edicts (Tretā Kā Thākura and Vishnu-hari inscriptions) The existence of Rāma’s Janmasthāna and a temple thereon is based not on beliefs alone but on unimpeachable evidences also Ayodhyā rarely witnessed demolition of temples during the Sultanate period Many Mughal monarchs were magnanimous rulers Inferno of Fanaticism during the reign of Aurangzeb Ayodhyā under Awadh Nawabs How a rumour resulted in the rupture of relations between the twocommunities in 1855 Aligarh Historians’ Contumelious Criticism of the Ayodhyā Verdict is devoid of substance
(1) Introduction ENVOI
Appendix II
Texts used in this book Official Publications
  • ← Prev
  • Back
  • Next →
  • ← Prev
  • Back
  • Next →

Chief Librarian: Las Zenow <zenow@riseup.net>
Fork the source code from gitlab
.

This is a mirror of the Tor onion service:
http://kx5thpx2olielkihfyo4jgjqfb7zx7wxr3sd4xzt26ochei4m6f7tayd.onion