Today’s psychologists continue to sleuth why people have depressive disorders and bipolar disorder, and to design more effective ways to treat and prevent them. Here, we focus primarily on depressive disorders. One research group summarized the facts that any theory of depression must explain, including the following (Lewinsohn et al., 1985, 1998, 2003):
The factors that put women at risk for depression (genetic predispositions, child abuse, low self-esteem, marital problems, and so forth) similarly put men at risk (Kendler et al., 2006). Yet women are more vulnerable to disorders involving internalized states such as depression, anxiety, and inhibited sexual desire. Women experience more situations that increase their risk for depression, such as receiving less pay for equal work, juggling multiple roles, and caring for children and elderly family members (Freeman & Freeman, 2013). Men’s disorders tend to be more external—alcohol use disorder, and disorders related to antisocial conduct and lack of impulse control. When women get sad, they often get sadder than men do. When men get mad, they often get madder than women do.
Armed with these facts, today’s researchers propose biological and cognitive explanations of depression, often combined in a biopsychosocial perspective.
Depression is a whole-body disorder. It involves genetic predispositions and biochemical imbalances, as well as negative thoughts and a gloomy mood.
Depressive disorders and bipolar disorder run in families. As one researcher noted, emotions are “postcards from our genes” (Plotkin, 1994). The risk of being diagnosed with one of these disorders increases if your parent or sibling has the disorder (Sullivan et al., 2000; Weissman et al., 2016). If one identical twin is diagnosed with major depressive disorder, the chances are about 1 in 2 that at some time the other twin will be, too. If one identical twin has bipolar disorder, the chances of a similar diagnosis for the co-twin are even higher—7 in 10—even for twins raised apart (DiLalla et al., 1996). Summarizing the major twin studies, one research team estimated the heritability of major depressive disorder—the extent to which individual differences are attributable to genes—at 40 percent (Polderman et al., 2015; see also Figure 67.2 for another study’s similar heritability findings for this and other disorders).
To tease out the genes that put people at risk for depression, some researchers have turned to linkage analysis. First, geneticists find families in which the disorder appears across several generations. Next, the researchers examine DNA from affected and unaffected family members, looking for differences. Linkage analysis points them to a chromosome neighborhood; “A house-to-house search is then needed to find the culprit gene” (Plomin & McGuffin, 2003). But depression is a complex condition. Many genes work together, producing a mosaic of small effects that interact with other factors to put some people at greater risk. Researchers continue to identify culprit gene variations that may open the door to more effective drug therapy (Hyde et al., 2016; Power et al., 2017).
Scanning devices let us eavesdrop on the brain’s activity during depressed and manic states. One study gave 13 elite Canadian swimmers the wrenching experience of watching a video of the swim in which they failed to make the Olympic team or failed at the Olympic games (Davis et al., 2008). Functional MRI scans showed the disappointed swimmers experiencing brain activity patterns similar to those of people with depressed moods.
Many studies have found diminished brain activity during slowed-down depressive states, and more activity during periods of mania (Figure 67.3). Depression can cause the brain’s reward centers to become less active (Miller et al., 2015; Stringaris et al., 2015). During positive emotions, the left frontal lobe and an adjacent reward center become more active (Davidson et al., 2002; Robinson et al., 2012).
Neuroscientists have also discovered altered brain structures in people with bipolar disorder. These studies discovered a decrease in myelinated axons (see Module 9) and enlarged fluid-filled ventricles (Arnone et al., 2009; Hibar et al., 2016).
Neurotransmitter systems also influence depressive disorders and bipolar disorder. Norepinephrine, which increases arousal and boosts mood, is scarce during depression and overabundant during mania. Drugs that decrease mania reduce norepinephrine.
Serotonin is also scarce or inactive during depression (Carver et al., 2008). One well-publicized study of New Zealand young adults found that the recipe for depression combined two necessary ingredients—significant life stress plus a variation of a serotonin-controlling gene (Caspi et al., 2003; Moffitt et al., 2006). Depression arose from the combination of an adverse environment plus a genetic susceptibility, but not from either alone. But stay tuned: The story of gene-environment interactions is still being written, as other researchers debate the reliability of this result (Culverhouse et al., 2013; Karg et al., 2011).
Drugs that relieve depression tend to increase norepinephrine or serotonin supplies by blocking either their reuptake (as Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil do with serotonin) or their chemical breakdown. Repetitive physical exercise, such as jogging, reduces depression in part because it increases serotonin, which affects mood and arousal (Airan et al., 2007; Ilardi, 2009; Jacobs, 1994). In one study, running for two hours increased brain activation in regions associated with euphoria (Boecker et al., 2008). To run away from a bad mood, you can use your own two feet.
What’s good for the heart is also good for the brain and mind. People who eat a heart-healthy “Mediterranean diet” (heavy on vegetables, fish, and olive oil) have a comparatively low risk of developing heart disease, stroke, late-life cognitive decline, and depression—all of which are associated with inflammation (Kaplan et al., 2015; Psaltopoulou et al., 2013; Rechenberg, 2016). Excessive alcohol use also correlates with depression, partly because depression can increase alcohol use but mostly because alcohol misuse leads to depression (Fergusson et al., 2009).
Biological influences contribute to depression, but in the nature–nurture dance, our life experiences also play a part. Diet, drugs, stress, and other environmental influences lay down epigenetic marks, molecular genetic tags that can turn certain genes on or off. Animal studies suggest that long-lasting epigenetic influences may play a role in depression (Nestler, 2011).
Thinking matters, too. The social-cognitive perspective explores how people’s assumptions and expectations influence what they perceive. Many depressed people view life through the dark glasses of low self-esteem (Orth et al., 2016). Their intensely negative assumptions about themselves, their situation, and their future lead them to magnify bad experiences and minimize good ones (Wenze et al., 2012). Listen to Norman, a Canadian university professor, recalling his depression:
I [despaired] of ever being human again. I honestly felt subhuman, lower than the lowest vermin. Furthermore, I was self-deprecatory and could not understand why anyone would want to associate with me, let alone love me. . . . I was positive that I was a fraud and a phony and that I didn’t deserve my Ph.D. . . . I didn’t deserve the research grants I had been awarded; I couldn’t understand how I had written books and journal articles. . . . I must have conned a lot of people. (Endler, 1982, pp. 45–49)
Expecting the worst, depressed people’s self-defeating beliefs and their negative explanatory style feed their depression.
Women may respond more strongly to stress (Hankin & Abramson, 2001; Mazure et al., 2002; Nolen-Hoeksema, 2001, 2003). For example, 38 percent of women and 17 percent of men entering American colleges and universities have reported feeling at least occasionally “overwhelmed by all I have to do” (Pryor et al., 2006). Relationship stresses also affect teen girls more than boys (Hamilton et al., 2015).
This gender stress difference may help explain why, beginning in their early teens, women have been nearly twice as vulnerable to depression. Susan Nolen-Hoeksema (2003) related women’s higher risk of depression to what she described as their tendency to ruminate or overthink. Staying focused on a problem (thanks to the continuous firing of a frontal lobe area that sustains attention)—can be adaptive (Altamirano et al., 2010; Andrews & Thomson, 2009a,b). But relentless, self-focused rumination can distract us, increase negative emotion, and disrupt daily activities (Johnson et al., 2016; Kircanski et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2017). Comparisons can also feed misery. While Josh is happily playing video games, lonely Lauren scrolls through her social media feed and sees Maria having a blast with friends, Angelique enjoying a family vacation, and Tyra looking super in a swimsuit. In response, Lauren broods: “My life is terrible.”
Even so, why do life’s unavoidable failures lead only some people to become depressed? The answer lies partly in their explanatory style—who or what they blame for their failures. Think of how you might feel if you failed a test. If you can externalize the blame (“What an unfair test!”), you are more likely to feel angry. If you blame yourself, you probably will feel stupid and depressed.
“ I think I, like a lot of people, have that type of brain where I find it interesting or fulfilling to worry about something.”
Comedian Maria Bamford
So it is with depressed people, who often explain bad events in terms that are stable (“It’s going to last forever”), global (“It’s going to affect everything I do”), and internal (“It’s all my fault”) (Figure 67.4). Depression-prone people respond to bad events in an especially self-focused, self-blaming way (Huang, 2015; Mor & Winquist, 2002; Wood et al., 1990a,b). When they describe themselves, their brains show extra activity in a region that processes self-relevant information (Sarsam et al., 2013). Their self-esteem is also more plastic—it climbs with praise and plummets with threats (Butler et al., 1994).
Self-defeating beliefs may arise from learned helplessness, the hopelessness and passive resignation humans and other animals learn when they experience uncontrollable painful events (Maier & Seligman, 2016) (see Module 29). Pessimistic, overgeneralized, self-blaming attributions may create a depressing sense of hopelessness (Abramson et al., 1989; Panzarella et al., 2006). As Martin Seligman has noted, “A recipe for severe depression is preexisting pessimism encountering failure” (1991, p. 78). What then might we expect of new college students who exhibit a pessimistic explanatory style? Lauren Alloy and her colleagues (1999) monitored several hundred students every 6 weeks for 2.5 years. Among those identified as having a pessimistic thinking style, 17 percent had a first episode of major depression, as did only 1 percent of those who began college with an optimistic thinking style.
Why is depression so common among young Westerners? Seligman (1991, 1995) pointed to the rise of individualism and the decline of commitment to religion and family. In non-Western cultures, where close-knit relationships and cooperation are the norm, major depressive disorder is less common and less tied to self-blame over personal failure (Ferrari et al., 2013; WHO, 2004a). In Japan, for example, depressed people instead tend to report feeling shame over letting others down (Draguns, 1990a).
Critics note a chicken-and-egg problem nesting in the social-cognitive explanation of depression. Which comes first—the pessimistic explanatory style or the depressed mood? The negative explanations coincide with a depressed mood, and they are indicators of depression. (Before or after being depressed, people’s thoughts are less negative. Perhaps a depressed mood triggers negative thoughts.) But do negative thoughts cause depression, any more than a speedometer’s reading causes a car’s speed? If you temporarily put people in a bad or sad mood, their memories, judgments, and expectations suddenly become more pessimistic. Memory researchers call this tendency to recall experiences that fit our current good or bad mood state-dependent memory (Module 32).
Depression is both a cause and an effect of stressful experiences that disrupt our sense of who we are and why we are worthy human beings. Such disruptions can lead to brooding, which amplifies negative feelings. Being withdrawn, self-focused, and complaining can in turn elicit rejection (Furr & Funder, 1998; Gotlib & Hammen, 1992). Indeed, people in the throes of depression are at high risk for divorce, job loss, and other stressful life events. Weary of the person’s fatigue, hopeless attitude, and negativity, a spouse may threaten to leave or a boss may begin to question the person’s competence. (This provides another example of genetic-environmental interaction: People genetically predisposed to depression more often experience depressing events.) Rejection and depression feed each other. Misery may love another’s company, but company does not love another’s misery.
“ Man never reasons so much and becomes so introspective as when he suffers, since he is anxious to get at the cause of his sufferings.”
Luigi Pirandello, Six Characters in Search of an Author, 1922
We can now assemble some of the pieces of the depression puzzle (Figure 67.5): (1) Stressful experiences interpreted through (2) a ruminating, pessimistic explanatory style create (3) a hopeless, depressed state that (4) hampers the way the person thinks and acts. This, in turn, fuels (1) further stressful experiences such as rejection. Depression is a snake that bites its own tail.
None of us are immune to the dejection, diminished self-esteem, and negative thinking brought on by rejection or defeat. Even small losses can temporarily sour our thinking. In one study, researchers studied some avid Indiana University basketball fans who seemed to regard the team as an extension of themselves (Hirt et al., 1992). After the fans watched their team lose or win, the researchers asked them to predict the team’s future performance and their own. After a loss, the morose fans offered bleaker assessments not only of the team’s future but also of their own likely performance at throwing darts, solving anagrams, and getting a date. When things aren’t going our way, it may seem as though they never will.
“ Some cause happiness wherever they go; others, whenever they go.”
Irish writer Oscar Wilde (1854–1900)
It is a cycle we can all recognize. Bad moods feed on themselves: When we feel down, we think negatively and remember bad experiences. Britain’s Prime Minister Winston Churchill called depression a “black dog” that periodically hounded him. Abraham Lincoln was so withdrawn and brooding as a young man that his friends feared he might take his own life (Kline, 1974). Poet Emily Dickinson was so afraid of bursting into tears in public that she spent much of her adult life in seclusion (Patterson, 1951). As their lives remind us, people can and do struggle through depression. Most regain their capacity to love, to work, and even to succeed at the highest levels.