Index

A/B tests, 65–66. See also Randomized controlled trials

Acceptability, 102

Animal spirits (Keynes), 34, 45

Ashraf, Nava, 74–75

Attendance at recruitment events, 88–89

increasing (see SMS invitations to employee recruitment events)

Automatic System, 39, 40, 46, 47, 184

behavioral insights and, 40, 182–183

disrupting the, 182–183

growing recognition of the power of, 39

rational choice theory and, 46

Reflective System and, 159, 163, 183, 184

reliance on, 128, 159, 163

Availability heuristic, 30

Becker, Gary, 41, 44

Bedford Jobcentre, 81, 92, 99, 101, 105–108, 116, 118, 132

Behavioral economics, 45–46, 55

animal spirits approach and, 34, 45

criticisms of, 39, 149

evolution of, 26–35

internalities and, 148

meanings and connotations of the term, 32

origins of, 32

rational choice theory and, 27–28, 32, 45

regulation and, 50

Behavioral insights, 1–5

barriers to more strategic use of, 125–126

ethics of using, 146–156, 158

impact, 20–23

increasing interest in, 193

the “key” insight of, 2

as a lens, 12–14

meaning of the term, x

as a movement, 60–65

origin of the term, 21

sparking wider engagement, 184–185

steps in applying, 82

Step 1: establish the scope, 83–85

Step 2: break the challenge into addressable parts, 86, 87f, 88

Step 3: identify the target outcome, 88–91

Step 4: map the relevant behaviors, 91–94, 93f, 95f

Step 5: identify the factors that affect each behavior, 94–98, 97f

Step 6: choose priority behaviors to address, 98–99, 100f, 101

Step 7: create evidence-led interventions to produce the priority behaviors, 101–108

Step 8: implement, 108–110

Step 9: assess the effects, 110–119

Behavioral insights (cont.)

Step 10: take actions based on the results, 119–122

ways they can produce enduring change, 129–130

Behavioral insights approach

ethics and acceptability of, 145–165

as practical and empirical, 16–20

robustness of the theory and evidence, 133–143

what to do in face of this crisis of evidence, 143–145

theory of, as incomplete and simplistic, 134–136

what it delivers in practice, 124

limited impact on high-level policy, 124–126

longevity and habituation, 128–131

measurement problems, 126–128

surviving scale-up, 131–133

what it offers, 6

incentives, 7–9

information, 6–7

legislation, 10–12

Behavioral insights “ecosystem,” emergence of a, 65–69

Behavioral Insights Group (Harvard University), 68

Behavioral prompts, internalization of external, 130

Behavioural Insights Team (BIT)/”Nudge Unit,” 55–61, 178

birth/creation of, 54–57

coining the term “behavioral insights,” 21

EAST framework, 105

goals, 57–59

size, 56–57

sunset clause, 56, 57

unemployment centers and, 109–110, 121

Bias, 39, 149. See also specific biases

among behavioral scientists, 174–175

Bias blind spot, 154

Big Five personality traits, 142–143

“Boost” approach, 40, 134, 154

Bounded rationality, 27–28

Capability, individual, 95

Capability, opportunity, and motivation. See COM-B model

Carbon emissions, reducing, 72–73, 125

Causal inference, 111

Choice architects, 48, 149

Choice architecture, 47

behavioral insights and, 129–130, 149, 180

compromise effect and, 12–13

impact on decisions, 46–47

nature of, 12, 46

role of, and level of responsibility, 153

Cialdini, Robert, 37

Citizen forums, 164

Citizen juries. See Deliberative forums/citizen juries

Clinical trial registration. See Preregistration

Cluster randomization (RCTs), 117–118

Colonoscopies made more bearable by exploiting the peak-end effect, 78–79

COM-B model, 94–95, 97, 101

Complex adaptive systems (CAS), 189

behavioral insights and, 187

cause and effects in, 188–189

overview and nature of, 185–186

Compromise effect, 12–13

Condoms, female

sales of, 74–75

Confirmation bias, 25, 149, 172

Contraception, 74–75

Control, illusion of, 189, 191

Control groups and treatment groups (RCTs), 113–114

Costbenefit analysis, 42, 59, 90

Crime. See Deterrence

Dark patterns, 146

Default option, 21, 73

Defaults, 53f, 72–73, 120, 125, 126, 163, 172

Default settings, 43, 47–48

Default template, 102, 122

Deliberative forums/citizen juries, 164–165, 184

Design thinking, 180

Desire lines, 181

Deterrence, 41–42. See also Rational choice theory

Dolan, Paul, 51–54

Dual-process theories, 66, 134–136, 171, 177

essence of the dual-process perspective, 37

the path toward, 35–40

EAST framework (BIT), 105

Ecological rationality, 39–40

Economics, 27. See also Behavioral economics; Homo economicus

Employment law, 86

Ethical critiques of behavioral insights, 148. See also Ethics; Manipulation; Paternalism

Ethical dilemmas, 162

Ethics, 102

of behavioral insights approach, 145–165

nudges/nudging and, 124, 163, 164

of using behavioral insights, 146–156, 158

Expected utility theory, 30

Express volitional deliberation, 37. See also Reflective System

External validity, 140. See also Generalizability

Fair Tax Mark, 185

File-drawer effect, 136–137, 143–144

Financial incentives. See Incentives

Food choices, 47. See also Sugared drink tax

Framing, 25

Friction, 146

Gallagher, Rory, 191

Generalizability, 123, 140–143

Gigerenzer, Gerd, 39–40

Good enough decision, 28

Good enough improvement, 90

Governments. See also specific topics

a shift in how they think about behavior, 40–46

Green consumer behavior, 72–73

Greener household energy tariffs, 72–73

Halpern, David, 51–55

Hansen, Pelle Guldborg, 214n46

Hassle factor, 72, 109, 110. See also “Sludge”

Health care and health decisions, 8–9, 10f, 47, 74–75, 78–79, 181–182

Heuristics, 28–30, 39–40, 134, 182, 183. See also Rules of thumb

Heuristic thinking, 134

Hindsight bias, 175

Hobbes, Thomas, 41

Homo economicus (economic man), 27, 29–32

Human-centered design, 178–183, 185

Hypothesis testing, 137, 143–144

standard assumptions of, 137

Incentives, 53f

when nonfinancial rewards are better than money, 74–75

Influence (Cialdini), 37

Information. See also specific topics

the effect of who says what, and how they say it, 76–77

Institute for Government (UK), 51–52

Internalities, 148

Internalization of external behavioral prompts, 130

Internal validity, 140

International Rescue Committee, 178

Involuntary action, 39. See also Automatic System

Ioannidis, John, 136–138

Irrationality, 134, 148, 151

James, William, 35–37

Jespersen, Andreas Maaløe, 214n46

Kahneman, Daniel, 28–31, 36–37, 40

King, Dominic, 51–54

“Knowledge brokers,” behavioral insights teams and experts acting as, 192

Legislation, 10–12

Leviathan (Hobbes), 41

Libertarian paternalism, 48, 54, 151

Loss aversion, 30–31

Malpractice, 138

Manipulation, 50, 65

concern that use of behavioral insights is manipulative, 153–156

use of behavioral insights in ways that are manipulative, 146

Market failures, 42–43

Marshmallow test, 141–143

Medical care. See Health care and health decisions

Mental accounting, 32, 34

Mere exposure effect, 25

Methodology. See Research practices

Milkman, Katy, 130–131

Mill, John Stuart, 26–27

MINDSPACE, 51–52, 53f, 54

Motivated reasoning, 155

Motivation, 97

Network analysis, 187

“Neutral design,” 48, 153

Norms, social, 21, 53f, 129

Nosek, Brian, 138–139

Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Thaler and Sunstein), 46–50, 66, 151, 170

Nudge(s)/nudging, 153, 163, 170, 174, 179

advantages of and arguments in favor of, 48–49

behavioral science, behavioral insights, and, 50, 55, 125, 170, 181, 184

vs. “boost,” 134

categories of, 172, 179, 214n46

to change food consumption, 172

complementing vs. replacing other approaches, 124–125

criticisms of, 49, 50, 124–125

definition, scope, and uses of the term, 170

development of the concept of, 48

ethics and, 124, 163, 164

guidelines for, 47

limitations of, 49

paternalism and, 48, 54, 153

politics and, 48, 55

research on, 172

vs. “sludge,” 146

Thaler and Sunstein’s vision of, 183

“Nudge for good,” 57, 67

Nudge plus networks, 188

“Nudge Unit.” See Behavioural Insights Team (BIT)/”Nudge Unit”

“Nudge unit” in India, 63

Nudging companies, 185

Null hypothesis, failing to (dis)prove the, 137, 143–144

O’Donnell, Gus, 51–54

Omission bias, 160f

Opportunity, 95

Overconfidence, 43, 149, 153

Packard, Vance, 65

Pain perception, peak-end effect and, 78–79

Paluck, Betsy Levy, 78

Partisan nudge bias, 163

Paternalism, 156

behavioral science, behavioral insights, and, 148, 149, 151, 153, 159–161

criticism of, 149

libertarian, 48, 54, 151

nudging and, 48, 153

public opinion and, 164

Peak-end effect, exploiting the, 78–79

Peak-end rule, 79

Persuasion, everyday, 37. See also specific topics

Power calculation, 113

Pragmatism, 193

Predictive analytics, 173–176

Preregistration (registered reports), 144

Priming, 53f, 154, 172

Publication bias, 140. See also File-drawer effect; Replication crisis

Publicity principle, 155

Public opinion on behavioral insights, 162–165

Public policy, behavioral, 195

Qualitative research approaches, 178

pairing quantitative approaches with, 178

Random assignment, 114–118

defined, 114

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 19, 20, 62, 65, 118, 187–188, 192

behavioral insights approach and, 18, 20, 126–127, 188

Behavioural Insights Team (BIT) and, 58–59

core principle, 18–19

features, 111–115

nature of, 110–112

paired with qualitative approaches, 178

purpose, 188

Rational actor model, 42

Rational choice theory, 32, 41–42, 46, 134

behavioral economics and, 27–28, 32, 45

vs. bounded rationality, 27–28

principles of, 27, 41

shortcomings and criticisms of, 27–32, 43, 44

Reasoned action, theory of, 36

Recruitment events. See Attendance at recruitment events; SMS invitations to employee recruitment events

Reflective System, 37, 128, 159, 163, 183, 184

Registered reports. See Preregistration

Reisch, Lucia, 162–163

Replication crisis, 133, 136–140

features of scientific publication that contribute to the, 136–138

Reproducibility Project, 138–139

Research practices, 145

bad, 137–138, 144

“there is no neutral design,” 48, 153

Risk assessment, 30

Rules of thumb, 2, 7, 28, 40, 73. See also Heuristics

Scalability, 102

Scale-up, surviving, 131–133

Self-control, 141–142

Similarity, illusion of, 104

Simon, Herbert, 27–28, 31

Skunk works, 57

“Sludge,” 146

SMS (short message service), 117f, 118f

SMS invitations to employee recruitment events, 81–82, 89–91, 94, 97f, 99, 100f, 101–103, 102f, 108–110

SMS system, 120

SMS template, 121, 122

Social and Behavioral Sciences Team (SBST), 62

Social marketing, 43–44

Social norms, 21, 53f, 129

Soda tax. See Sugared drink tax

Soft Drinks Industry Levy. See Sugared drink tax

Stanford marshmallow experiment. See Marshmallow test

Sugared drink tax, 8–9, 10f

Suicide, 161

Sunstein, Cass R., 46, 48–50, 162–163. See also Nudge

Behavioural Insights Team (BIT) and, 56

on libertarian paternalism, 48

on nudge/nudging, 47–49, 170, 183

policy, regulation, and, 50

Superiority bias, 191

Taxation, 14, 44, 58, 76, 125, 164. See also Sugared drink tax

Tax compliance, 19, 44, 58, 76, 185

Temptation bundling, 130–131

Test, Learn, Adapt process, 59

Text messaging. See SMS

Thaler, Richard H., 31–32, 46, 48–50. See also Nudge

Behavioural Insights Team (BIT) and, 56

Conservative Party (UK) advised by, 55

on libertarian paternalism, 48

on mental accounting, 32

on nudge/nudging, 47–49, 57, 170, 183

Token interference transparency, 214n45

Transparency, 156, 159, 160f

token interference, 214n45

Treatment groups, 113–114

Tversky, Amos, 28–31, 36–37

Unemployment, goal of reducing, 81–83, 86, 87f

Unemployment centers, 86, 88, 92–94, 109–110, 119–122. See also Bedford Jobcentre

Behavioural Insights Team (BIT) and, 109–110, 121

Unemployment policy, 90

“Upstreaming” (strategic) decision making, 192–193

Utilitarianism, 26, 205n3

Utility, 30

maximizing, 26, 205n3

Validity, 140. See also Generalizability

Vlaev, Ivo, 51–54

Voting behavior, 130

WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic), 140

WEIRD science and the problem of generalizability, 140–143

Workplace safety, improving

by redesigning the floor space around workstations, 77–78

Wu, Sherry Jueyu, 78

Wundt, Wilhelm, 36, 39

The MIT Press Essential Knowledge Series

AI Ethics, Mark Coeckelbergh

Algorithms, Panos Louridas

Annotation, Remi H. Kalir and Antero Garcia

Anticorruption, Robert I. Rotberg

Auctions, Timothy P. Hubbard and Harry J. Paarsch

The Book, Amaranth Borsuk

Behavioral Insights, Michael Hallsworth and Elspeth Kirkman

Carbon Capture, Howard J. Herzog

Citizenship, Dimitry Kochenov

Cloud Computing, Nayan B. Ruparelia

Collaborative Society, Dariusz Jemielniak and Aleksandra Przegalinska

Computational Thinking, Peter J. Denning and Matti Tedre

Computing: A Concise History, Paul E. Ceruzzi

The Conscious Mind, Zoltan E. Torey

Contraception: A Concise History, Donna J. Drucker

Critical Thinking, Jonathan Haber

Crowdsourcing, Daren C. Brabham

Cynicism, Ansgar Allen

Data Science, John D. Kelleher and Brendan Tierney

Deep Learning, John D. Kelleher

Extraterrestrials, Wade Roush

Extremism, J. M. Berger

Fake Photos, Hany Farid

fMRI, Peter A. Bandettini

Food, Fabio Parasecoli

Free Will, Mark Balaguer

The Future, Nick Montfort

GPS, Paul E. Ceruzzi

Haptics, Lynette A. Jones

Information and Society, Michael Buckland

Information and the Modern Corporation, James W. Cortada

Intellectual Property Strategy, John Palfrey

The Internet of Things, Samuel Greengard

Irony and Sarcasm, Roger Kreuz

Machine Learning: The New AI, Ethem Alpaydin

Machine Translation, Thierry Poibeau

Macroeconomics, Felipe Larrain B.

Memes in Digital Culture, Limor Shifman

Metadata, Jeffrey Pomerantz

The Mind–Body Problem, Jonathan Westphal

MOOCs, Jonathan Haber

Neuroplasticity, Moheb Costandi

Nihilism, Nolen Gertz

Open Access, Peter Suber

Paradox, Margaret Cuonzo

Phenomenology, Chad Engelland

Post-Truth, Lee McIntyre

Quantum Entanglement, Jed Brody

Recommendation Engines, Michael Schrage

Recycling, Finn Arne Jørgensen

Robots, John Jordan

School Choice, David R. Garcia

Science Fiction, Sherryl Vint

Self-Tracking, Gina Neff and Dawn Nafus

Sexual Consent, Milena Popova

Smart Cities, Germaine R. Halegoua

Spaceflight: A Concise History, Michael J. Neufeld

Spatial Computing, Shashi Shekhar and Pamela Vold

Sustainability, Kent E. Portney

Synesthesia, Richard E. Cytowic

The Technological Singularity, Murray Shanahan

3D Printing, John Jordan

Understanding Beliefs, Nils J. Nilsson

Virtual Reality, Samuel Greengard

Visual Culture, Alexis L. Boylan

Waves, Frederic Raichlen

Michael Hallsworth, PhD, is Managing Director of the Behavioural Insights Team (BIT) North America. He is an Assistant Professor (Adjunct) at Columbia University and an Honorary Lecturer at Imperial College London.

ELSPETH KIRKMAN founded BIT’s North American office before returning to the UK to run the organization’s social policy portfolio out of London. She has taught behavioral insights courses at Harvard and Warwick Universities and is a Visiting Senior Research Fellow at King’s College London.