[BACK TO 19:1] Saul told his son … to kill David. Saul now abandons his indirect attempts on David’s life (see 18:13 , 17 , 21 , 25 ) and adopts a more direct approach, leading to David’s departure from the court and from service to Saul (see vv. 12 , 18 ; 20:42 ).
[BACK TO 19:4] Jonathan spoke well of David. Jonathan does not let his own personal ambition distort his perception of David’s true theocratic spirit (see v. 5 and notes on 14:6 ; 17:11 ; 18:1 ).
[BACK TO 19:5] The L ORD won a great victory. See notes on 10:18 ; 12:11 ; 14:23 .
[BACK TO 19:6] Saul listened to Jonathan and took this oath. See 14:24 , 44 for previous oaths that Saul did not keep (see note on 14:39 ).
[BACK TO 19:9] evil spirit from the L ORD. See note on 16:14 ; cf. 18:10–11 .
[BACK TO 19:10] with his spear. See 18:10–11 ; 20:33 .
[BACK TO 19:12] through a window. For similar escapes, see Jos 2:15 ; Ac 9:25 .
[BACK TO 19:18] Ramah. Samuel’s home (see 7:17 and note on 1:1 ). Naioth. Means “habitations” or “dwellings.” The term appears to designate a complex of houses in a certain section of Ramah where a group of prophets resided (see vv. 19–20 , 22–23 ).
[BACK TO 19:20] group of prophets. See 10:5 and note. prophesying. See notes on 10:5 ; 18:10 .
[BACK TO 19:24] He lay naked all that day and all that night. Saul was so overwhelmed by the power of the Spirit of God that he was prevented from carrying out his intention to take David’s life. His frustrated attempts to kill David—his own inability to harm David and the thwarting of his plans by Jonathan’s loyalty, by Michal’s deception and by David’s own cleverness—all reach their climax here. Is Saul also among the prophets? This second occasion reinforced the first (see 10:11 and note). Its repetition underscores how alien Saul’s spirit was from that of these zealous servants of the Lord.
[BACK TO 20:1] Naioth at Ramah. See note on 19:18 .
[BACK TO 20:3] as surely as the L ORD lives. See note on 14:39 , 45 .
[BACK TO 20:5] New Moon feast. Each month of the year was consecrated to the Lord by bringing special sacrifices ( Nu 28:11–15 ) and blowing trumpets ( Nu 10:10 ; Ps 81:3 ). This observance also involved cessation from normal work, especially at the beginning of the seventh month ( Lev 23:24–25 ; Nu 29:1–6 ; 2Ki 4:23 ; Isa 1:13 ; Am 8:5 ).
[BACK TO 20:6] annual sacrifice. David’s statement indicates that it was customary for families to observe the New Moon feast together once in the year. There is no other reference in the OT to this practice.
[BACK TO 20:8] covenant. See note on 18:3 .
[BACK TO 20:11] let’s go out into the field. Jonathan acted to save David. Cain had said the same to Abel, but in order to kill him ( Ge 4:8 ; but see NIV text note there).
[BACK TO 20:13] may the L ORD deal with Jonathan , be it ever so severely. A common curse formula (see note on 3:17 ). May the L ORD be with you as he has been with my father. A clear indication that Jonathan expects David to become king.
[BACK TO 20:14] that I may not be killed. It was quite common in the ancient world for the first ruler of a new dynasty to secure his position by murdering all potential claimants to the throne from the preceding dynasty (see 1Ki 15:29 ; 16:11 ; 2Ki 10:7 ; 11:1 ).
[BACK TO 20:15] not … cut off your kindness from my family. This request was based on the covenant previously concluded between Jonathan and David (see note on 18:3 ) and was subsequently honored in David’s dealings with Jonathan’s son Mephibosheth (see 2Sa 9:3 , 7 ; 21:7 ).
[BACK TO 20:16] May the L ORD call David’s enemies to account. Jonathan aligns himself completely with David, calling for destruction of his enemies, even if that should include his father, Saul.
[BACK TO 20:17] reaffirm his oath. See vv. 14–15 , 42 ; 18:3 . he loved him as he loved himself. See 18:3 ; 2Sa 1:26 .
[BACK TO 20:18] New Moon feast. See note on v. 5 .
[BACK TO 20:19] the place where you hid. Perhaps the place referred to in 19:2 .
[BACK TO 20:21] as surely as the L ORD lives. See note on 14:39 , 45 .
[BACK TO 20:23] the matter you and I discussed. See vv. 14–17 . the L ORD is witness. Invoking God to act as witness and judge between them ensures that their agreement will be kept.
[BACK TO 20:25] Abner. Saul’s cousin and the commander of his army (see 14:50 ).
[BACK TO 20:26] ceremonially unclean. See note on 16:5 ; cf. Lev 7:19–21 ; 15:16 ; Dt 23:10 .
[BACK TO 20:27] , 30–31 son of Jesse. A contemptuous way of referring to David (see 22:7–9 , 13 ; 25:10 ; cf. 2Sa 16:10 ; Isa 7:4 ).
[BACK TO 20:30] son of a perverse and rebellious woman. The Hebrew idiom intends to characterize Jonathan, not his mother.
[BACK TO 20:31] neither you nor your kingdom will be established. Saul is now convinced that David will succeed him if David is not killed (see notes on 18:13 , 17 , 29 ; 19:1 ), and he is incapable of understanding Jonathan’s lack of concern for his own succession to the throne.
[BACK TO 20:33] hurled his spear. See 18:11 ; 19:10 .
[BACK TO 20:41] bowed … three times. A sign of submission and respect (see Ge 33:3 and note; 42:6 ).
[BACK TO 20:42] sworn friendship. See vv. 14–15 , 23 ; 18:3 . the town. Gibeah (see 10:26 ).
[BACK TO 21:1] Nob. A town northeast of Jerusalem and southeast of Gibeah (see map ) where the tabernacle was relocated after the destruction of Shiloh ( 4:3 ; Jer 7:12 ). Although it appears that no attempt was made to bring the ark to this sanctuary (see note on 7:1 ), Ahimelek the high priest, 85 other priests ( 22:16–18 ), the ephod (v. 9 ) and the consecrated bread (v. 6 ) are mentioned in connection with it. Ahimelek the priest. See note on 14:3 . It appears from 22:10 , 15 that David’s purpose in coming to Nob was to seek the Lord’s guidance by means of the Urim and Thummim (see notes on 2:28 ; Ex 28:30 ).
[BACK TO 21:2] It is not clear why David resorts to deception in his response to Ahimelek. Perhaps it was an attempt to protect Ahimelek from the charge of involvement in David’s escape from Saul. If so, his strategy was not successful (see 22:13–19 ).
[BACK TO 21:4] consecrated bread. The “bread of the Presence” (v. 6 ; see Ex 25:30 and note), which was placed in the Holy Place in the tabernacle and later in the temple as a thank offering to the Lord, symbolizing his provision of daily bread. provided the men have kept themselves from women. Although the bread was to be eaten only by the priests (see Lev 24:9 ), Ahimelek agreed to give it to David and his men on the condition that they were ceremonially clean (see Ex 19:15 ; Lev 15:18 ). Jesus uses this incident to illustrate the principle that the ceremonial law was not to be viewed in a legalistic manner (see Mt 12:3–4 ). He also teaches that it is always lawful to do good and to save life (see Lk 6:9 ). Such compassionate acts are within the true spirit of the law.
[BACK TO 21:5] are holy. That is, have been consecrated to God (see note on Ex 3:5 ).
[BACK TO 21:9] sword of Goliath. See note on 17:54 . ephod. See note on 2:28 .
[BACK TO 21:10] Achish. See note on Ps 34 title. The name may have been a traditional title used by Philistine rulers (see note on 1Ki 2:39 ). It appears as the title of a king of Ekron several centuries later (as attested in the annals of the Assyrian kings Esarhaddon and Ashurbanipal, as well as in an inscription found at Ekron in 1996). Gath. See 5:8 and note.
[BACK TO 21:11] See 29:5 and note on 18:7 . king of the land. The designation of David as “king” by the Philistines may be understood as a popular exaggeration expressing an awareness of the enormous success and popularity of David among the Israelite people.
[BACK TO 22:1] cave of Adullam. See 2Sa 23:13 ; Ge 38:1 and note; Jos 12:15 ; 15:35 .
[BACK TO 22:2] four hundred men were with him. David, officially an outlaw, was joined by others in similar circumstances, so that he began to develop a military power base that would sustain him throughout his later years as king (see note on 14:52 ).
[BACK TO 22:3] let my father and mother come and stay with you. The king of Moab was a natural ally for David because Saul had warred against Moab (see 14:47 ) and David’s own great-grandmother was a Moabite (see Ru 4:5 , 13 , 22 ).
[BACK TO 22:4] stronghold. Perhaps a specific fortress, but more likely a reference to a geographic area in which it was easy to hide (see 23:14 ; 2Sa 5:17 ; 23:14 ).
[BACK TO 22:5] prophet Gad. The king-designate is now served also by a prophet. Later a priest would come to him (v. 20 ) and complete the basic elements of a royal entourage—and they were all refugees from Saul’s administration. This is the first appearance of the prophet who later assisted David in musical arrangements for the temple services (see 2Ch 29:25 ), wrote a history of David’s reign (see 1Ch 29:29 ) and confronted David with the Lord’s rebuke for his sin of numbering the Israelites (see 2Sa 24:11–25 ). forest of Hereth. Located in the tribal area of Judah (see map ).
[BACK TO 22:6] tamarisk tree. See note on Ge 21:33 . Gibeah. See note on 10:5 .
[BACK TO 22:7–9] , 13 son of Jesse. See note on 20:27 , 30–31 .
[BACK TO 22:7] men of Benjamin. Saul, a Benjamite ( 9:1–2 ; 10:21 ), seeks to strengthen his position with his own officials by emphasizing tribal loyalty. David was from the tribe of Judah (see note on 16:1 ; 2Sa 2:4 ). give all of you fields and vineyards? Saul does exactly what Samuel had warned him that he would do—become like the kings of other nations (see 8:14 ). His actions are contrary to the covenantal ideal for kingship (see notes on 8:7 ; 10:25 ). commanders of thousands … hundreds. See 8:12 .
[BACK TO 22:10] Ahimelek inquired of the L ORD for him. See note on 21:1 .
[BACK TO 22:17] They knew he was fleeing. How much the priests really knew is not clear. David himself had not told them (see 21:2–3 , 8 ).
[BACK TO 22:18] linen ephod. See note on 2:18 .
[BACK TO 22:19] put to the sword Nob. Thus the prophecy of judgment against the house of Eli is fulfilled (see 2:31 and note).
[BACK TO 22:20] Abiathar , escaped and fled to join David. See note on v. 5 . Abiathar brought the high priestly ephod with him (see 23:6 ) and subsequently “inquired of the L ORD ” for David (see 23:2 and note; see also 23:4 , 9 ; 30:7–8 ; 2Sa 2:1 ; 5:19 , 23 ). He served as high priest until removed from office by Solomon for participating in the rebellion of Adonijah (see 1Ki 2:26–27 ).
[BACK TO 23:1–26:25] Four tests of David’s use of his growing power: (1) Will he use that power to defend Israel or only to promote his personal ambitions ( 23:1–6 )? (2) Will he use the power in his hand to kill the king who is trying to kill him ( 23:7–24:22 )? (3) Will he use his power to avenge the disdain of a commoner in the realm (ch. 25 )? (4) Will he use the power in his hand to kill the king who is out to destroy him (ch. 26 )?
[BACK TO 23:1] Keilah. Located about three miles southeast of Adullam (see map ).
[BACK TO 23:2] , 4 inquired of the L ORD. By means of the Urim and Thummim through the high priest Abiathar (see vv. 6 , 9 and note on 2:28 ).
[BACK TO 23:5] saved the people of Keilah. God uses David rather than Saul to be Israel’s protective “shepherd”—so again David protects Saul’s “flock.”
[BACK TO 23:9] Bring the ephod. See note on v. 2 .
[BACK TO 23:13] about six hundred. The number of David’s men has grown significantly (cf. 22:2 ).
[BACK TO 23:14] wilderness strongholds. Inaccessible places (see note on 22:4 ). Desert of Ziph. Located south of Hebron. God did not give David into his hands. The reality of God’s protection of David portrayed here contrasts sharply with the wishful thinking of Saul in v. 7 .
[BACK TO 23:17] You will be king over Israel. See notes on 18:4 ; 20:13 , 16 , 31 . I will be second to you. Jonathan’s love and respect for David enable him to accept a role subordinate to David without any sign of resentment or jealousy (see notes on 18:3 ; 19:4 ). This is the last recorded meeting between Jonathan and David. Saul knows this. See 18:8 and note on 20:31 .
[BACK TO 23:18] covenant. See notes on 18:3 ; 20:14–15 .
[BACK TO 23:19] strongholds. See v. 14 and note on 22:4 .
[BACK TO 23:29] En Gedi. See note on SS 1:14 ; see also map .
[BACK TO 24:1–26:25] In each of the three episodes in these chapters, David is put to a severe test in the desert as the Lord’s anointed ( 16:1–13 ; cf. Dt 8 , the testing of Israel in the wilderness; Mt 4:1–11 , the testing of Jesus in the wilderness). In all three events, circumstances place David in a position of power with opportunity to use that power for purely personal ends (avenging wrongs done to him) rather than in the service of the Lord and Israel. To have failed this test would have disqualified David—as it had disqualified Saul—from serving as the Lord’s appointed king over Israel.
Within these three chapters the final two confrontations between Saul and David take place. In both, the tables are turned and Saul is at the mercy of David. These two episodes (chs. 24 ; 26 ) bracket another (ch. 25 ) in which David has dealings with Nabal, a wealthy Judahite whose flocks David and his men have protected—as they have protected Saul’s “flock” from Philistine aggression. In this center episode, Nabal serves as a literary picture of Saul, who is thus exposed as a fool whom the Lord will soon strike down (see 25:38 ; cf. 26:10 ; 28:19 ; 31:4 ).
[BACK TO 24:1–22] Saul at the mercy of David while seeking privacy in a cave.
[BACK TO 24:4] This is the day the L ORD spoke of when he said. There is no previous record of the divine revelation here alluded to by David’s men. Perhaps this was their own interpretation of the anointing of David to replace Saul (see 16:13–14 ), or of assurances given to David that he would survive Saul’s vendetta against him and ultimately become king (see 20:14–15 ; 23:17 ). If the alternative given in the NIV text note is taken, the reference would be not to a verbal communication from the Lord but to the providential nature of the incident itself, which David’s men understood as a revelation from God that David should not ignore. I will give your enemy into your hands. So it seemed to David’s men (see also 26:8 ). Cf. what David says to Saul in v. 10 and contrast what the author has stated in 23:14 . cut off a corner of Saul’s robe. Perhaps David was symbolically depriving Saul of his royal authority and transferring it to himself (see v. 11 ; cf. also 15:27–28 ; 18:4 ).
[BACK TO 24:6] for he is the anointed of the L ORD. See v. 10 ; 26:9 , 11 , 16 , 23 ; 2Sa 1:14 , 16 . Because Saul’s royal office carried divine sanction by virtue of his anointing (see note on 9:16 ), David is determined not to wrest the kingship from Saul but to leave its disposition to the Lord who gave it (see vv. 12 , 15 ; 26:10 ).
[BACK TO 24:11] my father. See also Saul’s address to David as “my son” (v. 16 ). David uses this form of address either because (1) Saul was David’s father-in-law (see 18:27 ) or because (2) the special relationship between father and son was at times used as a metaphor for an intimate relationship between king and subject (see notes on 2Sa 7:14 ; Ps 2:7 ; see also chart ).
[BACK TO 24:14] dead dog. See note on 2Sa 9:8 . flea. See note on 26:20 .
[BACK TO 24:16] he wept aloud. Saul experiences temporary remorse (see 26:21 ) for his actions against David but quickly reverts to his former determination to kill him (see 26:2 ).
[BACK TO 24:21] not kill off my descendants. See notes on 20:14–15 .
[BACK TO 24:22] stronghold. An inaccessible place (see note on 22:4 ). From previous experience David did not place any confidence in Saul’s words of repentance.
[BACK TO 25:1–44] David’s dealings with Nabal (see notes on 23:1–26:25 ; 24:1–26:25 ). Nabal, the “fool” (see 25:25 and note), lived near Carmel, where Saul had erected a monument in his own honor (see 15:12 and note). The account of Nabal effectively serves the author’s purpose in a number of ways: (1) Nabal’s general character, his disdainful attitude toward David though David had guarded his flocks, and his sudden death at the Lord’s hand all parallel Saul (whose “flock” David had also protected). Thus the author indirectly characterizes Saul as a fool (see 13:13 ; 26:21 ) and foreshadows his end. (2) David’s vengeful attitude toward Nabal displays his natural tendency and highlights his restraint toward Saul (this event is sandwiched between the two instances in which David spared Saul in spite of the urging of his men). (3) Abigail’s prudent action prevents David from using his power as leader for personal vengeance (the very thing Saul was doing). (4) Abigail’s confident acknowledgment of David’s future accession to the throne foreshadows that event and even anticipates the Lord’s commitment to establish David’s house as a “lasting dynasty” (v. 28 ; cf. 2Sa 7:11–16 ). (5) Abigail’s marriage to David provides him a worthy wife, while Saul gives away David’s wife Michal to another.
[BACK TO 25:1] The author begins the David-Nabal episode by noting David’s loss of his chief protector in Israel (see 19:18–24 ) and ends it with a notation that David also loses his wife Michal, one of his protectors in the royal family itself (see 19:11–17 ). Meanwhile he obtains a wife whose wisdom rivals that of Ahithophel (see 2Sa 16:23 ). She is one of two wives who link him with the aristocracy of Judah. This account of how David obtained Nabal’s wife serves as a foil to the later account of how David obtained the wife of Uriah the Hittite ( 2Sa 11 ). There it is David who acts the fool. all Israel … mourned for him. Samuel was recognized as a leader of national prominence who played a key role in the restructuring of the theocracy with the establishment of the monarchy (see chs. 8–12 ). The loss of his leadership was mourned much like that of other prominent figures in Israel’s past history, including Jacob ( Ge 50:10 ), Aaron ( Nu 20:29 ) and Moses ( Dt 34:8 ). Ramah. See 7:17 and note on 1:1 .
[BACK TO 25:2] In ancient times wealth often consisted primarily of livestock (see Ge 12:16 ; 13:2 ).
[BACK TO 25:3] intelligent and beautiful … surly and mean. The stark contrast between the foolish Nabal and the wise Abigail is played out through the rest of the chapter. Calebite. A descendant of Caleb (see Nu 14:24 ), who settled at Hebron (see Jos 14:13 ) after the conquest of Canaan. Since Caleb’s name can mean “dog,” Nabal is subtly depicted as a dog, as well as a fool. He would soon be a dead dog (see note on 2Sa 9:8 ), when the Lord would avenge his acts of contempt toward David. The hint is strong that when the Lord avenges Saul’s sins against David (see 24:12 , 15 ), the king will no longer pursue a dead dog (see 24:14 ) but will himself become one—a case of biting irony.
[BACK TO 25:4] shearing sheep. A festive occasion (see v. 8 ; 2Sa 13:23–24 ).
[BACK TO 25:8] give … whatever you can find for them. David and his men ask for some consideration for their protection of Nabal’s shepherds and flocks against pillage (see vv. 15–16 , 21 ).
[BACK TO 25:10] son of Jesse. See note on 20:27 , 30–31 .
[BACK TO 25:17] wicked man. See note on Dt 13:13 . no one can talk to him. In this way, too, Nabal is like Saul (cf., e.g., 20:27–33 ).
[BACK TO 25:18] She took … bread … wine … sheep … grain … raisins … figs. A feast for a king. Cf. what Nabal had mentioned in v. 11 .
[BACK TO 25:19] did not tell her husband. Cf. Michal’s treatment of Saul ( 19:11–17 ).
[BACK TO 25:22] May God deal with David , be it ever so severely. See note on 3:17 . David invokes a curse on himself if he should fail to kill every male in Nabal’s household and so obliterate Nabal’s family.
[BACK TO 25:24] Pardon your servant. Abigail begins her appeal to David on an apologetic note (she is not taking on herself the blame for Nabal’s action), as she does again when she begins the second half of her appeal (v. 28 ). Contrast Nabal’s high-handed treatment of David.
[BACK TO 25:25] wicked man. See v. 17 and note on Dt 13:13 . He is just like his name. In ancient times a person’s name was believed to reflect their nature and character.
[BACK TO 25:26] as surely as the L ORD … lives. See note on 14:39 , 45 .
[BACK TO 25:28] The L ORD … will certainly make a lasting dynasty. While the idea that David was destined to become king in place of Saul may have spread among the general populace, Abigail’s assessment of David contrasts sharply with that of her husband (see v. 10 ). you fight the L ORD ’s battles. Abigail is familiar with David’s victories over the Philistines, in which he sought to glorify the Lord rather than advance his own honor (see 17:26 , 45–47 ; 18:17 ). no wrongdoing will be found in you. See v. 39 . Abigail shows concern for the preservation of David’s integrity in view of the office he was later to assume (see vv. 30–31 ).
[BACK TO 25:29] bound securely in the bundle of the living. Using the figure of placing a valuable possession in a carefully wrapped package for safekeeping, Abigail assures David that the Lord will preserve his life in the midst of danger. hurl away as from the pocket of a sling. A word that soon comes true for Nabal after he becomes “like a stone” (v. 37 ).
[BACK TO 25:30] ruler. See note on 9:16 .
[BACK TO 25:31] needless bloodshed. See note on v. 28 .
[BACK TO 25:32–34] Cf. David’s words in vv. 21–22 . His words there and here bracket the account of his meeting with Abigail and highlight the crucial role of wise Abigail’s actions.
[BACK TO 25:32] who has sent you. David recognizes the providential leading of the Lord in his encounter with Abigail (see v. 39 ).
[BACK TO 25:33] your good judgment. See v. 3 and note.
[BACK TO 25:36] holding a banquet. See Pr 30:21–22 . like that of a king. The author is using Nabal as a subtle portrayal of Saul.
[BACK TO 25:37] when Nabal was sober. Lit. “when the wine had gone out of Nabal”—containing a clever wordplay on Nabal’s name, which sounds very much like the Hebrew word for wineskin (as in v. 18 ). became like a stone. He who was without moral sensitivity (was a nabal ; see v. 25 and note) became as senseless as a stone.
[BACK TO 25:42] became his wife. She who acknowledged the Lord’s anointed came to share in his kingdom while her fool of a husband ended up a dead dog, a dead fool, an empty wineskin, a stone flung from a sling. He typifies Saul and all who reject the Lord’s anointed.
[BACK TO 25:43] Ahinoam. The mother of David’s first son, Amnon (see 2Sa 3:2 ). Jezreel. Located near Carmel (see v. 2 ; Jos 15:55–56 ) and not to be confused with the northern town of the same name, where Israel camped against the Philistines (see 29:1 , 11 ) and where Ahab resided in later times (see 1Ki 18:45–46 ; 21:1 ).
[BACK TO 25:44] Michal , David’s wife. See 18:27 .
[BACK TO 26:1–25] Saul is at the mercy of David while sleeping in the midst of his army encampment (see notes on 23:1–26:25 ; 24:1–26:25 ; 24:1–22 ).
[BACK TO 26:1] Ziphites. See 23:19 ; see also note on 23:14 . Gibeah. The site of Saul’s royal residence (see 10:26 ).
[BACK TO 26:2] Desert of Ziph. See 23:19 ; see also note on 23:14 . three thousand. Apparently Saul’s standing army (see 24:2 ).
[BACK TO 26:5] Abner. Saul’s cousin (see 14:50 ). lain down. David arrived at Saul’s camp during the night when the men were sleeping.
[BACK TO 26:6] Ahimelek the Hittite. Hittites had long resided in Canaan (see note on Ge 10:15 ; see also Ge 15:20 ; 23:3–20 ; Dt 7:1 ; 20:17 ). Another Hittite in David’s service was Uriah (see 2Sa 11:6–7 ; 23:39 ). Abishai son of Zeruiah , Joab’s brother. Zeruiah was David’s sister ( 1Ch 2:16 ), so Abishai and Joab (and their brother Asahel, 2Sa 2:18 ) were David’s nephews, as well as trusted military leaders. Joab would serve as the commander of his army for a long time.
[BACK TO 26:8] delivered your enemy into your hands. See 24:4 and note. pin him to the ground with … the spear. Just as Saul had tried to pin David to the wall with his spear (see 18:11 ; 19:10 ).
[BACK TO 26:9] , 11 lay a hand on the L ORD ’s anointed. See note on 24:6 .
[BACK TO 26:10] , 16 As surely as the L ORD lives. See note on 14:39 , 45 .
[BACK TO 26:12] David took the spear and water jug. In this way he sought to prove again to Saul that he did not seek his life. But he also showed Saul that God had given him the power to take away the spear with which Saul had often tried to kill him and the water jug on which Saul’s very life depended in the hot and dry Desert of Ziph.
[BACK TO 26:19] may he accept an offering. David knows no reason why God should be angry with him; but if for some reason God is behind Saul’s determined effort to kill him, David appeals for God to accept an offering of appeasement (cf. 16:5 )—in any event, to let the matter be settled between David and God without Saul’s involvement. may they be cursed before the L ORD ! David commits any such men to the judgment of God. the L ORD ’s inheritance. See note on 10:1 . David appeals to Saul’s conscience by describing his present exclusion from the fellowship of God’s people and from living at peace in the Lord’s land. Go , serve other gods. In their view, to be expelled from the Lord’s land was to be separated from the Lord’s sanctuary (an OT form of excommunication) and left to serve the gods of whatever land in which one might settle (see Jos 22:24–27 and note on 1Ki 5:17 ).
[BACK TO 26:20] look for a flea. See 24:14 . David suggests that Saul is making a fool of himself in his fanatical pursuit of an innocent and undesigning man.
[BACK TO 26:21] I have sinned. See 24:17 . I have acted like a fool. Saul confesses that his behavior has been not only unwise but also ungodly (see notes on 13:13 ; 25:2–44 ).
[BACK TO 26:23] I would not lay a hand on the L ORD ’s anointed. See v. 9 and note on 24:6 .
[BACK TO 26:25] you will … triumph. Saul makes a veiled reference to his own conviction that David will replace him as king (see 24:20 ).
[BACK TO 27:1–31:13] David’s flight to Philistia and Saul’s final defeat by the Philistines—while David is engaged in a campaign against the Amalekites.
[BACK TO 27:1] I will be destroyed by the hand of Saul. Under the pressure of Saul’s superior forces David feels compelled to seek security outside Israel’s borders. land of the Philistines. For the second time David seeks refuge in Philistia (see 21:10–15 ).
[BACK TO 27:2] Achish … king of Gath. See 21:10 and note. In contrast to David’s previous excursion into Philistia, Achish is now ready to receive him because he has become known as a formidable adversary of Saul. Moreover, to offer sanctuary under the circumstances would obligate David and his men to serve at his call in any military venture (see 28:1 ).
[BACK TO 27:3] Ahinoam. See note on 25:43 . Abigail. See 25:39–42 .
[BACK TO 27:4] he no longer searched for him. Saul did not have sufficient military strength to make incursions into Philistine territory, and with David out of the country he no longer faced an internal threat to his throne.
[BACK TO 27:5] in one of the country towns. David desired more independence and freedom of movement than was possible while residing under the very eyes of the king of Gath. Why should your servant live in the royal city with you? David implies that he is not worthy of this honor.
[BACK TO 27:6] Ziklag. Included in a list of towns in southern Judah (see Jos 15:31 ; see also map ). It was given to the tribe of Simeon (see Jos 19:1–5 ) and was presumably occupied by them (cf. Jdg 1:17–18 ), only to be lost to the Philistines at a later, undisclosed time. it has belonged to the kings of Judah ever since. As royal property.
[BACK TO 27:7] It was not until after the death of Saul that David moved his residence from Ziklag (see 2Sa 1:1 ; 2:1–3 ) to Hebron.
[BACK TO 27:8] Geshurites. A people residing in the area south of Philistia who were not defeated by the Israelites at the time of the conquest (see Jos 13:1–3 ) and who are to be distinguished from the Geshurites residing in the north near the upper Jordan in Aram (see 2Sa 3:3 ; 13:37–38 ; Dt 3:14 ; Jos 12:5 ). Girzites. Not mentioned elsewhere in the OT. Amalekites. See note on 15:2 . Shur. See note on 15:7 .
[BACK TO 27:9] he did not leave a man or woman alive. David’s reason for this is given in v. 11 ; his action conformed to that of Joshua in the conquest of Canaan (see, e.g., Jos 6:21 and note on 6:17 ).
[BACK TO 27:10] Negev of Judah. Negev in Hebrew means “dry” and designates a large area from Beersheba to the highlands of the Sinai peninsula. Jerahmeel. The Jerahmeelites were descendants of Judah through Hezron (see 1Ch 2:9 , 25 ). Kenites. See note on 15:6 .
[BACK TO 27:12] Achish trusted David. David led Achish to believe that he was raiding outposts of Israelite territory when in actuality he was attacking the Geshurites, Girzites and Amalekites (see v. 8 and map ).
[BACK TO 28:1] accompany me in the army. In the ancient Near East, to accept sanctuary in a country involved obligations of military service (see note on 27:2 ).
[BACK TO 28:2] you will see for yourself what your servant can do. Perhaps an ambiguous answer. I will make you my bodyguard. Very likely this was conditional on David’s proof of his loyalty and effectiveness in the projected campaign. Later, David would have a personal guard made up largely of Philistines (see 2Sa 15:18 and note).
[BACK TO 28:3] Now Samuel was dead. See 25:1 . Saul could not turn to him, even in desperation. expelled … from the land. Possibly a euphemism for “put to death,” in agreement with Pentateuchal law (see vv. 9 , 21 ). mediums and spiritists. See Lev 19:31 ; 20:6 , 27 ; Dt 18:11 .
[BACK TO 28:4] Shunem. The Philistines assembled their forces far to the north, along the plain of Jezreel in the territory of Issachar (see Jos 19:18 ). Gilboa. A range of mountains east of the plain of Jezreel (see map ).
[BACK TO 28:5] terror filled his heart. Because he was estranged from the Lord and was not performing his role as the true theocratic king (see note on 17:11 ).
[BACK TO 28:6] He inquired of the L ORD. Presumably through the agency of a priest. Saul seems to sense disaster in the approaching battle and seeks divine revelation concerning its outcome. dreams. Direct personal revelation (see Nu 12:6 and note on 12:6–8 ). Urim. Revelation through the priest (see note on 2:28 ). Since the authentic ephod and its Urim were with Abiathar, who was aligned with David (see 23:2 , 6 , 9 ), either Saul had fabricated another ephod for his use or the author used a conventional statement, including the three visual forms of revelation, to underscore his point. prophets. David had a prophet (Gad, 22:5 ), but after Samuel’s alienation from Saul ( 15:35 ) no prophet served Saul.
[BACK TO 28:7] Find me a woman who is a medium. In his desperation Saul turns to a pagan practice that he himself had previously outlawed (v. 3 ) in accordance with the Mosaic law (see Lev 19:31 ). Endor. Located about six miles northwest of Shunem (see v. 4 ; Jos 17:11 ).
[BACK TO 28:9] Why have you set a trap for my life … ? The woman is very cautious about practicing her trade with strangers, afraid that she might be betrayed to Saul (see note on v. 3 ).
[BACK TO 28:10] As surely as the L ORD lives. See note on 14:39 , 45 .
[BACK TO 28:12] When the woman saw Samuel. The episode has been understood in various ways. Most likely, God permitted the spirit of Samuel to actually appear to the woman. In any event, the medium was used to convey to Saul that the impending battle would bring death and end his dynasty—just as Samuel had previously announced ( 15:26 , 28 ), because of Saul’s unfaithfulness to the Lord. she cried out … You are Saul! By whatever means, the medium suddenly becomes aware that she is dealing with Saul.
[BACK TO 28:14] An old man wearing a robe. Saul remembers Samuel as customarily dressed in this apparel (see 15:27 ).
[BACK TO 28:17] torn the kingdom out of your hands and given … to David. See 15:28 and note. In desperation Saul had torn Samuel’s robe, an act symbolizing the Lord’s snatching the kingdom away from Saul (see 15:27–28 ). David had earlier cut off a corner of Saul’s robe, with similar symbolic meaning (see 24:4 and note).
[BACK TO 28:18] See 15:17–26 .
[BACK TO 28:19] tomorrow you and your sons will be with me. In the realm of the dead—Saul’s doom is sealed (see 31:6 ).
[BACK TO 28:21] When the woman came to Saul. This statement suggests that the woman removed herself from the direct view of Saul while she gave her messages.
[BACK TO 29:1] The Philistines gathered all their forces. The narrative flow broken at 28:2 is resumed. Aphek. A place in the vicinity of Shunem ( 28:4 ), to be distinguished from another place of the same name referred to in 4:1 (see note there; see also 1Ki 20:26 , 30 ; 2Ki 13:17 ).
[BACK TO 29:2] Philistine rulers. See note on 5:8 .
[BACK TO 29:3] I have found no fault in him. David’s tactics described in 27:10–12 were highly successful. (Cf. Pilate’s similar words about Jesus [ Lk 23:4 ; Jn 18:38 ].)
[BACK TO 29:4] the place you assigned him. Ziklag (see 27:6 ). or he will turn against us during the fighting. The Philistines had experienced just such a reversal on a previous occasion (see 14:21 ). taking the heads. As trophies of victory (see 17:51 ; see also 5:4 ; 31:9 and notes).
[BACK TO 29:5] See 21:11 and note on 18:7 .
[BACK TO 29:6] As surely as the L ORD lives. See note on 14:39 , 45 . Achish swears by the God of Israel apparently as a means of proving his sincerity to David.
[BACK TO 29:8] But what have I done? David pretends disappointment in order to keep intact his strategy of deception. In reality this turn of events rescued David from a serious dilemma. Why can’t I go and fight against the enemies of my lord the king? David again uses an ambiguous statement (see 28:2 ). To whom was he referring as “my lord the king”—Achish or Saul or the Lord?
[BACK TO 29:9] as an angel of God. A common simile (see 2Sa 14:17 and note).
[BACK TO 29:11] Jezreel. The place of Israel’s camp (see v. 1 ).
[BACK TO 30:1–31:13] While Saul goes to his death at the hands of the Philistines, David is drawn into and pursues the Lord’s continuing war with the Amalekites (see 15:2–3 and notes).
[BACK TO 30:1] Ziklag. See note on 27:6 . Amalekites. See 27:8 and note on 15:2 . The absence of David and his warriors gave the Amalekites opportunity for revenge. Negev. See note on 27:10 .
[BACK TO 30:5] Ahinoam. See note on 25:43 . Abigail. See 25:42 .
[BACK TO 30:6] David found strength in the L ORD. As he had throughout his life (see 17:37 and note).
[BACK TO 30:7] Abiathar the priest. See note on 22:20 . ephod. See note on 2:28 .
[BACK TO 30:14] Negev. See note on 27:10 . Kerethites. Along with the Pelethites, they later contributed contingents of professional warriors to David’s private army (see 2Sa 8:18 and note; 15:18 ; 20:7 ; 1Ki 1:38 ). The name may indicate that they originally came from the island of Crete (see Jer 47:4 and note). Negev of Caleb. The area south of Hebron (see Jos 14:13 ).
[BACK TO 30:17] camels. The mount of choice for the Amalekites and other eastern peoples (see Jdg 6:3 , 5 and note on 6:5 ).
[BACK TO 30:22] troublemakers. See note on Dt 13:13 .
[BACK TO 30:23] what the L ORD has given us. See 25:28 and note. David gently but firmly rejects the idea that their victory is to be attributed to their own prowess. Because the Lord gave the victory, no segment of David’s men could claim any greater right to the spoils than any other.
[BACK TO 30:24] All will share alike. Cf. Ex 16:18 and note.
[BACK TO 30:26] elders of Judah , who were his friends. David sent the plunder as an expression of gratitude to those who had assisted him during his flight from Saul (see v. 31 ), thus preparing the way for his later elevation to kingship in Judah (see 2Sa 2:1–4 ).
[BACK TO 30:29] Jerahmeelites. See note on 27:10 . Kenites. See note on 15:6 .
[BACK TO 30:31] Hebron. The most important city in the central part of Judah. The other locations mentioned are to the southwest and southeast of Hebron.
[BACK TO 31:1] , 8 Mount Gilboa. A range of hills (see 2Sa 1:21 ) at the southeast end of the Plain of Jezreel and at the head of the valley that leads down to Beth Shan. It is referred to elsewhere in the OT only as the place where Saul died (see 2Sa 1:6 , 21 ; 21:12 ; see also map ).
[BACK TO 31:2] Jonathan , Abinadab and Malki-Shua. See note on 14:49 . The surviving son, Ish-Bosheth or Esh-Baal ( 1Ch 8:33 ; 9:39 ), was afterward promoted by Abner, who somehow survived the battle, to succeed his father as king ( 2Sa 2:8–9 ).
[BACK TO 31:4] uncircumcised fellows. See 14:6 and note. abuse me. A practice that was not uncommon; previously the Philistines had mutilated and humiliated Samson after his capture (see Jdg 16:21–25 ). took his own sword and fell on it. The culmination of a long process of self-destruction.
[BACK TO 31:6] all his men. Those who had served around him in his administration (but see note on v. 2 ).
[BACK TO 31:9] They cut off his head. David had done the same to Goliath (see 17:51 ). sent messengers throughout the land. Probably bearing Saul’s head and armor as proof and trophies of their victory (see 5:4 and note).
[BACK TO 31:10] They put his armor in the temple. Symbolic of ascribing the victory to the Philistine gods. Ashtoreths. See note on 7:3 . Beth Shan. See note on Jos 17:11 .
[BACK TO 31:11] Jabesh Gilead. See note on 11:1 .
[BACK TO 31:12] They took down the bodies of Saul and his sons. The men of Jabesh Gilead had not forgotten how Saul had come to their defense when they were threatened by the Ammonites (see 11:1–11 ). burned them. Cremation was not customary in ancient Israel and here appears to have been done to prevent any further abuse of the bodies of Saul and his sons by the Philistines.
[BACK TO 31:13] took their bones and buried them. David later had their remains removed from Jabesh and placed in the family burial grounds of Zela in Benjamin (see 2Sa 21:11–14 ). fasted seven days. As an indication of their mourning for Saul (cf. 2Sa 1:12 ; 3:35 ; 12:16 , 21–23 ).
2 Samuel
a quick look
Author:Unknown
Audience:God’s chosen people, the Israelites
Date:Sometime after Israel was divided into the northern and southern kingdoms in about 930 BC
Theme:2 Samuel presents the story of David’s 40-year reign, beginning with his rise to become Israel’s model king and ending with his subsequent decline caused by sin.
Title
1 and 2 Samuel were originally one book (see Introduction to 1 Samuel: Title ).
Literary Features, Authorship and Date
See Introduction to 1 Samuel: Literary Features, Authorship and Date .
Contents and Theme: Kingship and Covenant
2 Samuel depicts David as a true (though imperfect) representative of the ideal theocratic king. David was initially acclaimed king at Hebron by the tribe of Judah (chs. 1–4 ) and subsequently was accepted by the remaining tribes after the murder of Ish-Bosheth, one of Saul’s surviving sons ( 5:1–5 ). David’s leadership was decisive and effective. He captured Jerusalem from the Jebusites and made it his royal city and residence ( 5:6–13 ). Shortly afterward he brought the ark of the Lord from the house of Abinadab to Jerusalem, publicly acknowledging the Lord’s kingship and rule over himself and the nation (ch. 6 ; Ps 132:3–5 ).
Under David’s rule the Lord caused the united kingdom to prosper, to defeat its enemies and, in fulfillment of his promise (see Ge 15:18 ), to extend its borders from Egypt to the Euphrates (ch. 8 ). David wanted to build a temple for the Lord—as his royal house, as a place for his throne and as a place for Israel to worship him. But the prophet Nathan told David that he was not to build the Lord a house (temple); rather, the Lord would build David a house (dynasty). Ch. 7 announces the Lord’s promise that this Davidic dynasty would endure forever. This climactic chapter also describes the establishment of the Davidic covenant (see notes on 7:1–29 , 11 , 16 ; Ps 89:30–37 ). Later the prophets make clear that a descendant of David who sits on David’s throne will perfectly fulfill the role of the theocratic king. He will complete the redemption of God’s people (see Isa 9:6–7 ; 11:1–16 ; Jer 23:5–6 ; 30:8–9 ; 33:14–16 ; Eze 34:23–24 ; 37:24–25 ), thus enabling them to achieve the promised victory with him ( Ro 16:20 ).
David was a king after God’s own heart because he was willing to acknowledge his sin and repent.
After the description of David’s rule in its glory and success, chs. 9–20 depict the darker side of his reign and describe David’s weaknesses and failures. Even though David remained a king after God’s own heart because he was willing to acknowledge his sin and repent ( 12:13 ), he nevertheless fell far short of the theocratic ideal and suffered the disciplinary results of his disobedience ( 12:10–12 ). His sin with Bathsheba (chs. 11–12 ) and his leniency with regard both to the wickedness of his sons ( 13:12–39 ; 14:1 , 33 ; 19:4–6 ) and to the insubordination of Joab ( 3:28–39 ; 20:10 , 23 ) led to intrigue, violence and bloodshed within his own family and the nation. It eventually drove him from Jerusalem at the time of Absalom’s rebellion. Nonetheless the Lord was gracious to David, and his reign became a standard by which the reigns of later kings were measured (see 1Ki 15:3–5 ; 2Ki 18:3 ; 22:2 ).
The book ends with David’s own words of praise to God, who had delivered him from all his enemies ( 22:31–51 ), and with words of expectation for the fulfillment of God’s promise that a king will come from the house of David and rule “over people in righteousness” ( 23:3–5 ). These poems echo many of the themes of Hannah’s song ( 1Sa 2:1–10 ), and together they frame (and interpret) the basic narrative.
The Gihon spring (see 2Sa 5:8 and note) provided a natural water source for ancient Jerusalem.
Todd Bolen/ www.BiblePlaces.com
Chronology
See Introduction to 1 Samuel: Chronology .
Outline
Below is an outline for 2 Samuel. For an outline of both 1 and 2 Samuel, see Introduction to 1 Samuel: Outline .
7. David’s reaction to and lament over Saul’s death ( 2Sa 1 )C. David Becomes King over Judah ( 2:1–3:5 )
D. David Becomes King over All Israel ( 3:6–5:5 )
VII. David’s Reign Characterized Illustratively ( 5:6–8:18 )
A. David’s Conquest of Jerusalem and His Recognition by the King of Tyre ( 5:6–16 )
B. David’s Crushing of the Philistine Threat ( 5:17–25 )
C. David’s Bringing the Ark into His Royal City (ch. 6 )
D. God’s Covenant with David (ch. 7 )
E. David’s Victories that Secure the Boundaries of His Kingdom (ch. 8 )
VIII. Threats to David’s Reign Overcome (chs. 9–20 )
A. David’s Kindness to Saul’s Remaining Heir (ch. 9 )
B. Defeat of the Ammonite-Aramean Challenge to David’s Reign ( 10:1–19 ; 12:26–31 )
C. David’s Shameful Abuse of His Royal Power in the Matter of Bathsheba and Uriah ( 11:1–12:25 )
D. Absalom’s Challenge to David’s Rule (chs. 13–20 )
1. Amnon’s abuse of power and Absalom’s revenge (ch. 13 )2. Absalom’s revolt crushed (chs. 14–19 )3. Absalom’s attempt sparks another unsuccessful revolt (ch. 20 )IX. Sidebars to the David Story (Chiastically Arranged) (chs. 21–24 )
A. God’s Wrath against Israel because of Something Saul Had Done ( 21:1–14 )
B. Exploits of David’s Mighty Men in Wars against Philistines ( 21:15–22 )C. David’s Song in Praise of the Lord for Victories Granted (ch. 22 )C’. David’s “Last Words” that Speak of God’s Ways with Him and His House ( 23:1–7 )B’. David’s Mighty Men and Their Exploits, Especially against Philistines ( 23:8–39 )A’. God’s Wrath against Israel because of Something David Did (ch. 24 )