Abatements
free-market environmentalism, 109–12, 122–23
real-world environmental policy, 128–29, 153n2
Aggregate output, 78
Agricultural preserves, 137, 138–39
Albert, M., 87
American Power Act, 152
An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Smith), 3–4, 54–55
Apollo Alliance, 99
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), 25
Arrhenius, Svante, 159
Arsenic standards, 18
Bias
contingent valuation (CV) surveys, 26–27
endogenous preferences model, 87–91
Boyce, J., 239
British Petroleum (BP), 39, 232
Brundtland Commission. See United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development
Bull in the China closet economy, 76, 100n1
Bush, George H.W., 96
Callendar, Guy Stewart, 159
Carbon cap-and-trade programs
auctioned permits, 131, 132, 135, 146–48
financial crises, 145–46, 148–51
grandfather system, 131
mandatory caps, 164–66, 175–76, 183–84
paternalism, 188
real-world environmental policy, 130–32, 144–49, 153n1
supply and demand, 148, 154n19
treaty conditions, 162, 166–72
versus international carbon tax, 204–7
Carbon cycle, 186
cost-benefit analysis (CBA), 21–24
See also Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
Carbon Limits and Energy for America’s Renewal (CLEAR) Act, 135, 152
Carbon sequestration
climate treaty guidelines, 199–201
Carbon tax, 129–30, 153n1, 204–7
Cardinal theory of utility, 14–15
Certified emissions reductions (CERs)
climate treaty guidelines, 196–97, 199–203
Kyoto Protocol (1997), 166–72, 180–81, 184, 185, 188
Civil rights, 18
Clean Air Act (1990), 24, 96, 97, 129
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), 162, 165, 170–72, 178, 180, 185, 189, 190, 199–201, 203
Clean Water Act, 129
Climate change
carbon dioxide emissions, 68–69, 79
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, 68–69, 79
mainstream economic theory, 68–69
Climate policy reform
community-based economics (CBE), 234–36, 242n4
environmental benefit-revealing
green consumerism, 233
institutional versus technical reform, 233–34
iteration facilitation board (IFB), 237–39
in my back yard (IMBY) principle, 234–36
not in my back yard (NIMBY) principle, 230, 235–36
participatory economy, 237–39, 242n8
participatory planning procedure, 237–39, 242n7
Climate treaty exercise, 165–66, 187, 215–27
efficiency criterion, 217, 219, 221, 223, 226–27
equity criterion, 217, 219, 221, 223–25, 227
Climate treaty guidelines
certified emissions reductions (CERs), 196–97, 199–203
environmental justice activism
Greenhouse Development Rights Framework, 191, 197–99, 206–7, 213n2
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, 196, 205–6
international carbon tax, 204–7
international compliance
China, 208
international monitoring agency, 201–3
less developed countries (LDCs), 197, 202–3, 206–7, 208
mainstream economic theory, 196
more developed countries (MDCs), 196–97, 201–3, 206–10
responsibility and capability criterion, 197–98, 206–7
Climate treaty negotiations
effectiveness criterion, 164
historical development, 159–63
See also Earth Summit (Rio de Janeiro, 1992); Kyoto Protocol (1997)
Clinton, Bill, 96
Coalition of Rainforest Nations, 188
Coase theorem. See Free-market environmentalism
Collective consumption, 84
Common pool resource (CPR)
climate change, 69
community management, 142–44, 154n16
fishing industry, 64–68, 140–44
institutional analysis and development (IAD), 140, 143–44
mainstream economic theory, 53–54, 64–68, 69
marginal private cost (MPC), 67
real-world environmental policy, 139–44
tragedy of the commons, 64, 67, 139–40
Common property resource, 64
Community-based economics (CBE), 234–36, 242n4
Community management, 142–44, 154n16
Competitive consumption, 82
Conference of the Parties to the Convention (COP) (Copenhagen, 2009), 161–62, 163, 178, 189, 190
Conspicuous consumption, 82–83
Consumption
collective consumption, 84
competitive consumption, 82
conspicuous consumption, 82–83
ecological footprint, 84, 101n11
endogenous preferences model, 85–91
free-rider problem, 84
mainstream economic theory, 81–84, 85–91
public goods, 84
Contingent valuation (CV) surveys
cost-benefit analysis (CBA), 19–20, 25–27, 29–30
embedded bias, 27
hypothetical bias, 27
ignorance bias, 27
strategic bias, 27
willingness to accept damages (WTA) survey, 26–27, 29–30
willingness to pay (WTP) survey, 26–27, 29–30
Corrective tax, 95–96, 237, 238–39
Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)
carbon dioxide emissions, 21–24
cardinal theory of utility, 14–15
civil rights, 18
contingent valuation (CV) surveys, 19–20, 25–27, 29–30
economic climate models, 30–32, 33n7
efficiency criterion, 12–13, 32n1
environmental preference-revealing mechanism, 28–29
environmental risk uncertainty, 30–32
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, 23, 30–32, 58, 59f
hedonic regression, 28
marginal social benefit (MSB), 12–13, 22
marginal social cost (MSC), 12–13, 21–22
option value, 25
ordinal theory of utility, 14–15
power and wealth impact, 19–20
power-weighted decision rule, 20
quantifying environmental benefits, 24–30, 33n6
rate of time discount, 20–21, 22f
social justice theory, 18
standard diagram, 12f
sulfur dioxide emissions, 24, 58
use value, 25
Cuba, 44
Defensive expenditures, 39
Deforestation
climate treaty guidelines, 200–1, 214n4
Kyoto Protocol (1997), 163, 188–90, 200–1
perverse incentives, 189, 200–1
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 191, 198
Designated national authority (DNA), 203
Development zones, 138
Downzoning, 135–36, 137, 138, 139
Drinking water, 18
Earth Summit (Rio de Janeiro, 1992)
environmental unemployment, 96
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, 161
negotiations of, 161–62, 163, 165
responsibility and capability criterion, 161, 165
sustainable development, 161
Ecological footprint, 84, 101n11
Economic climate models, 30–32, 33n7
Economic conversion programs, 98, 99–100
Economic democracy, 41–42, 44–46
Economic development, 77
Economic growth
aggregate output, 78
bull in the China closet economy, 76, 100n1
versus development, 77
sustainable growth, 36
Economic justice
cost-benefit analysis (CBA), 17, 32n3
sustainable development, 41–42, 44–46
Economic progress, 40–41, 44–46
Ecosystems
tipping points, 8
Effectiveness criterion
climate treaty negotiations, 164
sustainable development, 40–41, 44–45
Efficiency criterion
climate treaty exercise, 216–27
cost-benefit analysis (CBA), 12–13, 32n1
energy consumption, 97, 102n21
free-market environmentalism, 109–114, 122
Kyoto Protocol (1997), 165–66, 181–83, 190
Effluent tax, 95
Embedded bias, 27
Empty-world economics
consumption, 82
externalities, 7
mainstream economic theory, 3–4, 5–6
sustainable development, 41
Endogenous preferences model
hedonic calculus, 87
mainstream economic theory, 85–91
preference development effect, 88, 90
preference fulfillment effect, 88, 90
snowballing inefficiency theorem, 89–90
substitution effect, 87
warped human development theorem, 90–91
Energy consumption, 97, 102n21
Enforcement
Kyoto Protocol (1997), 192
real-world environmental policy, 132–33
Environmental benefit-revealing mechanism, 237–39, 242n5
Environmental justice activism, 210–13
Environmental Kuznets curve, 91–94
scale effect, 93
Environmental preference-revealing mechanism, 28–29
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 18
Environmental sustainability, 42–44, 46, 48n6, 49n9
Equity criterion
climate treaty exercise, 216–27
climate treaty guidelines, 197–99
climate treaty negotiations, 164–65
intergenerational equity, 41–42
intragenerational equity, 41
Kyoto Protocol (1997), 164–65, 183–84, 191
European Union, 162, 163, 197, 207–8
Evolutionary economics, 87
Exchange value, 80
Exogenous preferences model, 87
Externalities
defined, 6
empty-world economics, 7
free-market environmentalism, 107–8
invisible hand theory, 6–7, 9n1, 54–55
mainstream economic theory, 53–59
negative externality, 7, 58, 68, 95
positive externality, 68–69, 95
Exxon Valdez, 39
Financial crises, 145–46, 148–51
Fishing industry, 64–68, 140–44
Flat tax, 134
Fourier, Joseph, 159
Fourteenth Amendment, 136
France, 197
Free-market environmentalism
Coase theorem
complete information, 112, 115
divide-the-pie game, 112–14, 117–18
illustration, 107f
incomplete information, 115–18
multiple victims analysis, 109, 119–21
complete information, 112–14, 115, 122–23, 124, 125n7
divide-the-pie game, 112–14, 117–18
experimental literature, 112, 113–14, 125n10
theoretical literature, 112–13, 114
efficiency criterion, 109–114, 122
laissez-faire economics, 106, 109
multiple victims analysis, 109, 119–21, 123–24
representative coalitions, 120–21
separate negotiations, 120
perfect knowledge, 114–15, 123–24
perverse incentives, 121–22, 123–24
property rights, 105, 107–9, 121–23
transaction costs, 107–8, 119–21, 122, 123–24
Free-rider problem
climate change, 69
climate treaty guidelines, 212–13
climate treaty negotiations, 163–64
consumption, 84
contingent valuation (CV) surveys, 26–27
Earth Summit (Rio de Janeiro, 1992), 163–64
free-market environmentalism, 123–24
Kyoto Protocol (1997), 163–64, 176–77
mainstream economic theory, 53–54, 57–58, 59–63, 69, 88
Free trade agreements, 98
Frictional unemployment, 96, 97
Full-world economics
Gender Development Index (GDI), 44
Gender Empowerment Index (GEM), 44
Genuine progress indicator (GPI), 44
Germany, 197
Governing the Commons (Ostrom), 139–40
Grandfather system, 131
Green consumerism, 233
Greenhouse Development Rights Framework, 191, 197–99, 206–7, 213n2
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
climate treaty guidelines, 196, 205–6
cost-benefit analysis (CBA), 23, 30–32, 58, 59f
Earth Summit (Rio de Janeiro, 1992), 161
Green investment, 240
Green jobs, 240
Green tax, 95
Gross domestic product (GDP)
current GDP, 37
sustainable development, 36–39, 44–46
Gross national product (GNP), 36, 48n1, 77, 100n2
Growth boundaries, 138
Hahnel, R., 87
Hansen, James, 160
Hedonic calculus, 87
Hedonic regression, 28
Human Development Index (HDI), 44
Human Development Report (United Nations), 44
Hypothetical bias, 27
Iceland, 162
Ignorance bias, 27
Income inequality, 40, 41, 83, 91–94
Inflation, 37
In my back yard (IMBY) principle, 234–36
Institutional analysis and development (IAD), 140, 143–44
Intergenerational equity, 41–42
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 160–61
Intragenerational equity, 41
Invisible hand theory, 6–7, 9n1, 54–55
Iteration facilitation board (IFB), 237–39
Jobs in the Woods program, 99
Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA), 99
Keeling, Charles, 160
Keeling curve, 160
Keynes, John Maynard, 4
Kyoto Protocol (1997)
carbon cycle, 186
carbon trading
mandatory caps, 164–66, 175–76, 183–84
paternalism, 188
certified emissions reductions (CERs), 166–72, 180–81, 184, 185, 188
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), 162, 165, 170–72, 178, 180, 185, 189, 190, 199–201, 203
deforestation, 163, 188–90, 200–1
effectiveness criterion, 164
efficiency criterion, 165–66, 181–83, 190
emissions reduction schedule, 178
enforcement of, 192
environmental unemployment, 96
equity criterion, 164–65, 183–84, 191
free-rider problem, 163–64, 176–77
less developed countries (LDCs), 162, 165, 170–72, 177, 178, 183–84, 185, 188–90, 191
limitations of, 178
more developed countries (MDCs), 162, 164, 165, 166–72, 176–77, 178, 183–84, 185, 186–88, 191
national emission measures, 179–80
ratification incentives, 176–77
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD), 188–90, 200–201, 214n3
responsibility and capability criterion, 177, 191
United States position, 162–63, 176–77, 191
Laissez-faire economics, 106, 109
Laundry detergent, 62–63, 73n3
Less developed countries (LDCs)
climate treaty guidelines, 197, 202–3, 206–7, 208
Earth Summit (Rio de Janeiro, 1992), 161
Kyoto Protocol (1997), 162, 165, 170–72, 177, 178, 183–84, 185, 188–90, 191
Logic of Collective Action, The (Olson), 96
Mainstream economic theory
climate treaty guidelines, 196
collective consumption, 84
common pool resource (CPR), 53–54, 64–68, 69
employment versus environment, 96–100
empty-world economics, 3–4, 5–6
endogenous preferences model, 85–91
environmental Kuznets curve, 91–94
exogenous preferences model, 87
free-rider problem, 53–54, 57–58, 59–63, 69, 88
marginal private benefit (MPB), 55, 58, 59f, 63f
marginal private cost (MPC), 55, 58, 59f, 67
marginal social benefit (MSB), 54–55, 58, 59f, 61, 63f
marginal social cost (MSC), 54–55, 58, 59f, 61, 63f
natural resource economics, 4–6
net national product (NNP), 71–73
net national welfare (NNW), 71–73
perverse incentives, 53–54, 63, 67, 69, 75–76, 85
Pigovian taxes and subsidies, 95–96
pollution-damage-revealing mechanism, 95, 102n20
private resource extraction, 53–54, 69–73
profit maximization, 84–85, 86, 101n16
public goods, 53–54, 59–63, 69
transaction costs, 56–58, 61, 86–87, 88–89
Marginal private benefit (MPB)
public goods, 63f
Marginal private cost (MPC)
common pool resource (CPR), 67
Marginal social benefit (MSB)
cost-benefit analysis (CBA), 12–13, 22
Marginal social cost (MSC)
cost-benefit analysis (CBA), 12–13, 21–22
Marrakech Accords, 163
Marxism
exchange value, 80
surplus value, 80
Monitoring
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), 162, 165, 170–72, 178, 180, 185, 189, 190, 199–201, 203
designated national authority (DNA), 203
international monitoring agency, 201–3
project design document (PDD), 203
real-world environmental policy, 132–33
More developed countries (MDCs)
climate treaty guidelines, 196–97, 201–3, 206–10
Earth Summit (Rio de Janeiro, 1992), 161
Kyoto Protocol (1997), 162, 164, 165, 166–72, 176–77, 178, 183–84, 185, 186–88, 191
National Academy of Sciences, 18
National defense, 84
Natural capital
net domestic product (NDP), 38–41
sustainable development, 38–14, 48n2
Natural resource economics, 4–6
Net domestic product (NDP)
defensive expenditures, 39
sustainable development, 38–41, 44
Net national product (NNP) per capita, 71–73
Net national welfare (NNW)
defined, 71
New Zealand, 162
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), 98
North East Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, 132
Norway, 162
Not in my back yard (NIMBY) principle, 230, 235–36
Olson, M., 96
Option value, 25
Ordinal theory of utility, 14–15
Organization of Economic and Cooperation and Development (OECD), 162
Overspent American, The (Schor), 82
Overworked American, The (Schor), 81
Participatory economy, 237–39, 242n8
Participatory planning procedure, 237–39, 242n7
Perverse incentives
free-market environmentalism, 121–22, 123–24
mainstream economic theory, 53–54, 63, 67, 69, 75–76, 85
Pigovian taxes and subsidies, 7, 95–96, 237, 238–39
Political economy, 3
Political Economy of the Environment (Boyce), 239
Pollution-damage-revealing mechanism, 95, 102n20
Pollution tax, 95
Power-weighted decision rule, 20
Preference development effect, 88, 90
Preference fulfillment effect, 88, 90
net domestic product (NDP), 38–41
sustainable development, 38–44
Profit maximization, 84–85, 86, 101n16
Project design document (PDD), 203
Property rights
free-market environmentalism, 105, 107–9, 121–23
real-world environmental policy, 129, 132, 135–39
Proportional tax, 134
Public goods
climate change, 69
consumption, 84
environmental protection, 62–63
mainstream economic theory, 53–54, 59–63, 69
Quiet Revolution in Welfare Economics (Albert and Hahnel), 87
Rate of time discount
cost-benefit analysis (CBA), 20–21, 22f
future market failure, 71
net national welfare (NNW), 71–73
Readjustment assistance programs, 98–99
Real-world environmental policy
carbon cap-and-trade programs, 130–32, 144–49, 153n1
auctioned permits, 131, 132, 135, 146–48
financial crises, 145–46, 148–51
grandfather system, 131
supply and demand, 148, 154n19
common pool resource (CPR), 139–44
community management, 142–44, 154n16
institutional analysis and development (IAD), 140, 143–44
property rights, 129, 132, 135–39
rebates, 135
taxation
flat tax, 134
proportional tax, 134
revenue-neutral tax, 134
agricultural preserves, 137, 138–39
development zones, 138
downzoning, 135–36, 137, 138, 139
growth boundaries, 138
transfer development rights (TDRs), 138–39, 154n11
upzoning, 138
Rebates, 135
Redefining Progress, 44
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and
Degradation (REDD), 188–90, 200–1, 214n3
Regulation
common pool resource (CPR), 141–42, 154n15
real-world environmental policy, 128–29, 141–42, 153n1
Relative income hypothesis, 82–83
Resources for the Future, 5
Responsibility and capability criterion
climate treaty guidelines, 197–98, 206–7
Earth Summit (Rio de Janeiro, 1992), 161, 165
Kyoto Protocol (1997), 177, 191
Revenue-neutral tax, 134
Safety standards, 18
Scale effect, 93
Second World Climate Conference (1989), 160
Snowballing inefficiency theorem, 89–90
Social justice theory
cost-benefit analysis (CBA), 18
Social sustainability, 46
Sri Lanka, 44
Steady state economy, 36
Strategic bias, 27
Structural unemployment, 96–100
Sulfur dioxide emissions
cost-benefit analysis (CBA), 24, 58
structural unemployment, 97
Surplus value, 80
Sustainable development
Earth Summit (Rio de Janeiro, 1992), 161
economic democracy, 41–42, 44–46
economic efficacy, 40–41, 44–45
economic justice, 41–42, 44–46
economic progress, 40–41, 44–46
empty-world economics, 41
environmental sustainability, 42–44, 46, 48n6, 49n9, 48n6, 49n9
Gender Development Index (GDI), 44
Gender Empowerment Index (GEM), 44
genuine progress indicator (GPI), 44
gross domestic product (GDP), 36–39, 44–46, 48n1
Human Development Index (HDI), 44
intergenerational equity, 41–42
intragenerational equity, 41
net domestic product (NDP), 38–41, 44
social sustainability, 46
steady state economy, 36
sustainable growth, 36
Sustainable growth, 36
Sweden, 99
Taxation
carbon tax, 129–30, 153n1, 204–7
corrective tax, 95–96, 237, 238–39
effluent tax, 95
flat tax, 134
green tax, 95
Pigovian taxes and subsidies, 7, 95–96, 37, 238–39
pollution tax, 95
proportional tax, 134
revenue-neutral tax, 134
Throughput
defined, 6
Tipping points
cost-benefit analysis (CBA), 21–24
ecosystems, 8
Tragedy of the commons, 64, 67, 139–4
Transaction costs
free-market environmentalism, 107–8, 119–21, 122, 123–24
mainstream economic theory, 56–58, 61, 86–87, 88–89
Transfer development rights (TDRs), 138–39, 154n11
Tyndall, John, 159
Ukraine, 162
Unemployment
economic conversion programs, 98, 99–100
energy consumption, 97, 102n21
versus environmental standards, 96–100
free trade agreements, 98
frictional unemployment, 96, 97
readjustment assistance programs, 98–99
structural unemployment, 96–100
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. See Earth Summit (Rio de Janeiro, 1992)
United Nations Environment Program, 160
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 160–61, 165, 175–76
United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development, 35–36, 41, 160
United States
climate treaty guidelines, 208–10
Kyoto Protocol (1997), 162–63, 176–77, 191
United States Constitution, 136, 209
Upzoning, 138
Use value, 25
Utilitarianism
cardinal theory of utility, 14–15
cost-benefit analysis (CBA), 14–15, 18
ordinal theory of utility, 14–15
Vietnam, 44
Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Company (1926), 136
Warped human development theorem, 90–91
self-warping, 91
Willingness to accept damages (WTA) survey, 26–27, 29–30
Willingness to pay (WTP) survey, 26–27, 29–30
World Climate Conference (1979), 160
World Development Report (World Bank), 44
World Meteorological Organization, 160
World Trade Organization, 99
Zoning regulations
agricultural preserves, 137, 138–39
development zones, 138
downzoning, 135–36, 137, 138, 139
growth boundaries, 138
real-world environmental policy, 135–39
transfer development rights (TDRs), 138–39, 154n11
upzoning, 138