Chapter 12

Face-Offs

The offensive face-off gives coaching staffs and players their only opportunity to implement static set plays, like those that occur in football. Teams should prepare their plays off ice first and then work to integrate these face-off plans into their practices. Once a month, take time in practice to run through what you want the players to do at each face-off dot. Doing this takes time and tends to slow the pace of practice, but roughly 60 face-offs occur in a game, which means 60 times to win or lose possession of the puck, so the effort is worth the time. In addition to all players going through the face-offs, the centers must work on the skill of taking the draw. Not much time is needed for a coach to do 50 reps with a center before or after practice, focusing on his technique. Centers should work on winning draws on the forehand, on the backhand, by tying up, and at times by touching the puck through to catch the opposition by surprise. Make sure that one of your coaches becomes an expert at teaching these face-offs skills. High-level hockey has changed in this area of the game. When Ryan Walter began to play in the NHL as a center man, both centers tried to cheat laterally by adjusting the position of their skates to their advantage. Today, the requirement that skates face north–south has changed the way that center men try to generate an advantage. The center should get his skates as close to the center dot as possible, forcing him to hold the stick in a lateral position instead of straight out in front of him. This lateral stick positioning maximizes the center man’s leverage and positioning to win the face-off.

In the past many coaches taught their players to never turn the bottom hand on the stick because doing so was telling their opponent which way they would be drawing the puck. Turning the bottom hand is another way to increase the power and leverage needed to win face-offs. Most face-offs are won by powering under the opponent’s stick or obstructing the opponent’s stick with your own and kicking the puck back to your players. Few face-offs are won by chopping at the puck or picking the puck out of the air.

Face-off strategies in the defensive zone tend to be a little more conservative. The goal is still to win possession of the puck, but not losing the draw directly to the opponent is primary. To accomplish this strategy, the face-off tactics change as well. During his playing career, Ryan took many face-offs against Mark Messier. We like the face-off move that Mark used, so we will call this one the Messier. Instead of going directly after the puck, Mark’s first move was directly toward his opponent’s stick, interfering with his ability to win the face-off. Mark would then draw the puck directly back to secure puck possession for his team. Many players use this tactic but did not have Mark’s level of success, and here is why. Mark had a trick. He would elevate his bottom hand, thereby extending the amount of stick that he could reach toward his opponent’s stick. This maneuver allowed Mark to generate maximum interference against his opponent’s ability to win the face-off.

Understanding the strategy of face-offs and teaching the skill of winning face-offs will create more control for your team and help elevate the confidence of your players. Increased confidence comes from increased preparation. Continuously practicing the tactics and skill of your team’s face-offs will pay off in a big way.

If your team is playing at an advanced level, start to rotate each winger through face-off technique practice as well. Preparing your wingers to be better than average on winning face-offs allows your center men to be much more aggressive on their draws. This type of extra preparation pays off when your center is kicked out of the face-off circle on the penalty kill and the winger replaces him.

Consider having a face-off play book that includes responsibilities as well as diagrams illustrating the execution patterns. Some teams have developed a DVD or USB sticks to give to the centers, who much like a quarterback in football need to know the formation and how to set up. This video should have dialogue and a clear illustration of the plays. Because of the clarity and camera angle, a good method is to collect plays from NHL, college, and junior games and edit the material down for your players.

Finally, depending on the age of your group, you may want to have the centers pick the option for their line for that night or come to you with a play they think will work. This type of player ownership can be effective; the players will definitely focus if they choose the play because they want it to work.

Have face-off plays for all face-off dots and for specific game situations. The way that a team lines up five on five is much different from how they line up for four-on-four and three-on-three situations. Don’t forget power-play five on four, four on three, and five on three; penalty-kill four on five, three on four, and three on five; and late-game pulled-goaltender plays defensively and offensively. Over the course of my NHL career across three teams and seven head coaches, we implemented many face-off set plays, but they tended to be drawn from the following categories.

Offensive Zone Face-Offs

Offensive zone face-offs are an opportunity to create a scoring chance off a set play. Even if teams lose the draw, they can still recover possession and get a shot or chance. Many sophisticated offensive face-off alignments have been developed over the years, but the alignments discussed here cover the basics of offensive zone strategy and provide enough options for teams at every level. You may want to challenge your staff to come up with a set play of their own, but don’t overwhelm your team with too many choices.

Offensive Zone: Won Draws

In the offensive zone, winning the draw and maintaining possession are critical. This section describes various set plays off won draws. A team cannot run all of them every night. Having some variance is important, but as with all systems of play, execution is the key to success. Give the team one play to run for every game; that way they will become used to all the setups so that later in the year they can adjust on the spur of the moment. In addition, having variety in plays from game to game keeps the opposition off balance and forces them to have to react in coverage. Make the opposition coaches work to figure out what you are running and how to cover that setup.

Neutral Zone Face-Offs

At one time, many coaches, especially European coaches, gave little thought to draws in the neutral zone. Their feeling was that they were not important and didn’t lead to anything. Most times their players would line up and halfheartedly take the draw. Now almost all coaches realize the importance of winning the face-off and gaining puck possession. Because of the change in emphasis on neutral zone draws, many new strategies have evolved to create a quick attack off this face-off or to apply forechecking pressure when the draw is lost.

Neutral Zone: Won Draws

Only a few face-off plays create an offensive advantage in the neutral zone. Opponents will press with one or two players off a lost face-off in the neutral zone, taking away passing lanes or closing ice, so having a plan with the puck is crucial. These actions tend to emulate neutral zone regroup options for moving the puck up ice. Described here are seven face-off plays from the center-ice and blue-line face-off dots.

Neutral Zone: Lost Draws

To regain possession of the puck off a lost draw, these strategies may be used on any of the five neutral zone face-off circles. In most situations, this sets up a team’s neutral zone forecheck.

Defensive Zone Face-Offs

Winning a face-off in the defensive zone results in an opportunity to break out and go on the attack. Losing the face-off in the defensive zone forces a team to defend and essentially go into defensive zone coverage until a turnover happens. We discuss both situations and provide strategies for each.

Defensive Zone: Won Draws

Described here are seven plays that teams can use when they win the draw in the defensive zone. Teams should practice breaking out on a won draw from both sides of the ice. The option used will depend to a degree on how the opposition forechecks and what you believe your team can execute. The final two options in this section, the breakaway and quick-change plays, are trick plays that might be used only a couple times a year. They can be used at any time of the game but generally are saved for moments when you are down by a goal, because each of them includes a degree of risk. The rate of successfully completing these plays is much lower than for the others provided, but if your opponents are not ready, you may catch them by surprise

Defensive Zone: Lost Draws

Teams may use two variations of alignments in their defensive zone. Outlined here are the responsibilities for each player when the face-off is lost. Five across is the most common alignment, in which all players are set to defend; D back gives you an offensive advantage if you win the draw, but it requires some quick adjustments if you lose.

Power-Play Face-Offs

Winning or tying up and getting possession on power-play draws are crucial. If the other team clears the puck, the power-play unit generally needs 20 seconds to get set up again, which is both frustrating and tiring. Described here are three ways to get possession and set up. Players and coaches should also try to recognize what the penalty-killing unit is trying to do if they win the draw; by doing so, you may be able to regain possession even though you lost the draw.

Penalty-Kill Face-Offs

Because the face-off is such an important part of the penalty kill, it was covered in depth in chapter 10 on penalty kills. As mentioned in that chapter, gaining possession on special teams is important. Penalty-killing units want to frustrate the power play by making them go back down the ice 200 feet (61 m) to get the puck and start a breakout. More face-off options are presented in the Face-Offs and Penalty Kills section in chapter 10, but here are two common strategies to use after winning draws in the defensive zone.

Special Face-Off Situations

In this section, we cover face-off strategies for four-on-four play and late-game pulled-goaltender situations. Although four-on-four face-offs aren’t common in a game, the team needs to be prepared, especially because overtime at most levels uses four-on-four play to decide the game. Pulled-goaltender situations also don’t happen often, but good execution of face-offs can be critical in getting that tying goal.

Four-on-Four Face-Offs

We outline one offensive and two defensive alignments for four-on-four situations. On lost draws, coverage is much more difficult when teams are four on four because the center is often tied up taking the face-off and can’t get out to the opposing defenseman. Having the D take the draw is a strategy that should be considered.

Pulled Goaltender

The excitement ratchets upward when a team pulls the goaltender for an extra attacker. Usually, this occurs in the last minute of the game, and the strategy should be to create a chance right off the draw. The play doesn’t have to be complicated, but all players need to know what option is being executed. Here are a few strategies.