Chapter 16
IN THIS CHAPTER
Introducing the 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans
Extracting advice on smart food choices
Adapting the Guidelines to your real life
There is no end to the list of really good people who want to help you find a diet that will make it possible for you to live healthy and practically forever. The American Heart Association says to edit your consumption of fats. The American Cancer Society says to eat more fruits and veggies. The American Diabetes Association says to eat regular meals so your blood sugar stays even. The Food Police pretty much say if it tastes good, forget it!
Happily, one group puts it all together: The U.S. Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services’ 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans makes it possible to make and enjoy food choices that both taste good and benefit your body.
The Dietary Guidelines for Americans is a collection of sensible nutrition suggestions first published by the U.S. Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services (USDA/HHS) as a skinny, 20-page booklet in 1980.
Since then, USD and HHS have published seven revised editions (1985, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015). The one in 2010 weighed in at a hefty 110 pages, with so many words, sentences, and paragraphs — some repeated several times — that it was not released until January 31, 2011, one month into the timetable for the next edition.
The 2015–2020 edition of the Guidelines also took a while to arrive but made it onto the Internet by January 7, 2016, three weeks and three days faster than the previous one.
Surprisingly, the most user-friendly of the Guidelines remains the 2000 version, which seemed to have been written by real people who actually like real food. You could see this philosophy right upfront in the first sentence in the first paragraph: “Eating is one of life’s greatest pleasures.”
Contrast that with the first sentence of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005: “The Dietary Guidelines for Americans, first published in 1980, provides science-based advice to promote health and reduce risk for chronic disease through diet and physical activity.” Alas, what you saw was what you got: a frankly cranky, bare-bones, chilly presentation of the facts.
The 2010 edition was a verbose but directed pull-up-your-bootstraps-and-get-with-the-program document with a single-minded focus on the fact that too many Americans weigh too much (see Chapter 4). The take-away message could not be more clear: Control what you eat to control your weight to control your health.
The 2015–2020 edition with three multi-section chapters, 14 appendices, and 19 tables and 24 figures, some of which compare Americans’ performance to the recommendations to show exactly how bad people are at following dietary directions, delivers pretty much a similar common-sense dietary message but with a few important changes tossed in for flavor.
Note: Throughout this chapter, when you read “see Chapter X,” it means the chapter in this book, not in the Guidelines.
In general, the changes in the Guidelines over the years can be tracked in subtle shifts in emphasis. For example, from 1980 to 1995, the Guidelines offered the simple admonition to “Eat a variety of foods.” Then in 2000, that was expanded to suggest using the Food Guide Pyramid (see Chapter 17) to make nutritious choices including a variety of grains, fruits, and vegetables. In 2010, the My Plate diagram arrived to push the Pyramid off the table, a move some consumers still regret.
The 2015–2020 edition continues this tradition with its rather plain vanilla recommendations:
Approaching the specifics, the Guidelines say that: “Healthy eating patterns include a variety of nutritious foods like vegetables, fruits, grains, low-fat and fat-free dairy, lean meats and other protein foods and oils, while limiting saturated fats, trans fats, added sugars, and sodium. A healthy eating pattern is adaptable to a person’s taste preferences, traditions, culture, and budget.”
Well, you bet “nutritious foods” are a good bet. But not just any old nutritious foods. The authors of the Guidelines have some specifics firmly in mind:
After that, the 2015–2020 Guidelines take a short running jump into new territory. This edition
For more specific info on these new recommendations, read on through the following sections.
In 1980, the Guidelines advised consumers to “Avoid too much sodium.” By 2000, that had become “Choose and prepare foods with less salt.” The 2015–2020 recommendations are the same as those from 2010.
Most Americans consume about 3,400 milligrams (1.5 teaspoons) of sodium a day. The Guidelines say, “Enough already,” and advise everyone to cut that to 2,300 milligrams a day, or about 1 teaspoon of table salt. If you’re older than 51 or are African American or have hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes, or chronic kidney disease, the recommendation is even more stringent. People in this group, which includes about half of all Americans, should take in no more than 1,500 milligrams of sodium per day, or about ⅔ teaspoon of table salt.
These recommendations have stirred some serious discussion because most people have no problems with sodium. They eat a lot one day, a little less the next, and their bodies adjust.
Others, however, don’t react so evenly. For them, a high-sodium diet appears to increase the risk of high blood pressure. When you already have high blood pressure, you can tell fairly quickly whether lowering the amount of salt in your diet lowers your blood pressure. But no test is available to predict whether someone who doesn’t have high blood pressure will develop it by consuming a diet that’s high in sodium. That begs the question: Should medical advice that works for some people be applied to all people?
The new rule on dietary fat and cholesterol — no rules — is a truly revolutionary dietary revelation.
As all good foodies know, until now, the Guidelines have laid out precise numbers on how much fat and cholesterol a healthy diet would allow, such as “no more than 10 percent of a day’s calories from saturated fats” and “less than 300 milligrams cholesterol a day.”
No more. The 2015–2020 Guidelines simply say to be smart but not obsessive: Just avoid the saturated fats and keep cholesterol consumption low.
This change in factoring fats was driven by the fact that when told to cut back on fats, most people just cut back on fats — good, bad and in-between. But some fats, such as those found in certain plant foods like avocados and nuts (check out Chapter 28 for more on these superstar foods), are good for you.
Word to the fat-wise #1: You can reduce your intake of solid fats in food, and thus your intake of saturated fats, simply by wielding a sharp knife to cut away as much visible fat as possible from meat and poultry as well as stripping off the fat-laden poultry skin.
Word to the fat-wise #2: Liquid fats, otherwise known as oils, are mixtures of saturated fats and unsaturated fats. See Chapter 7 to find out which oils are high in saturated fatty acids and which are not.
Another first for the new Guidelines is the recommendation to hold your consumption of added sugars to less than 10 percent of your daily calories. Notice the word added because this means editing your diet to reduce foods to which sugar is added, such as cakes and cookies — or coffee with three spoons of sugar — not to avoid foods with naturally occurring sugars such as fruits. The new Guidelines bless moderate coffee consumption because coffee is sugar-free, so don’t mess with a good thing.
For various reasons, even an adequate diet may be deficient in specific nutrients. One example is the fact that as we age, our bodies may be less able to absorb vitamin B12 from food, meaning that supplements are sensible.
As always, this edition of the Guidelines stresses the need to obtain adequate amounts of important nutrients.
For the recommended amounts of each nutrient, as well as a more detailed explanation of their benefits, check out Chapter 8 (dietary fiber), Chapter 10 (vitamins), and Chapter 11 (minerals).
Finding a balance in what fish to eat and how much can be challenging. On the one hand, fish provides undeniably beneficial omega-3 fatty acids EPA and DHA, whose benefits are listed in Chapter 7. On the other hand, some fish is contaminated with methylmercury, a toxic metal that can wreak neurological and cardiovascular havoc, particularly in the fetus and in children.
Taking this into account, the Guidelines recommend that most healthy people consume about 8 ounces of fish and seafood a week to get the 250 milligrams per day of EPA and DHA associated with a lower risk of death from heart disease among otherwise healthy people and an improved outcome for newborns.
The fish of choice include salmon, anchovies, herring, shad, sardines, Pacific oysters, trout, and Atlantic and Pacific mackerel. Children and women who are of child-bearing age, pregnant, or nursing should avoid all King mackerel, shark, swordfish, and tile fish, species widely acknowledged to be highly contaminated. And these two groups should eat no more than 12 ounces of fish a week, including no more than 6 ounces of canned albacore tuna. (See Chapter 24 for a list of fish and their mercury levels.)
In 1980, the first Guidelines directed consumers to “Eat foods with adequate starch and fiber.” By 1990, that had become, “Choose a diet with plenty of vegetables, fruits, and grain products.” Today, the new, direct directive is to make half of your plate vegetables and fruits. Maybe the whole plate: The Guidelines say right out, no mincing words here, that vegetable-rich diets promise a variety of health benefits, including lower weight, a lower risk of heart disease, and — best of all — a longer life.
The Guidelines’ Appendix 5, “Healthy Vegetarian Eating Pattern,” and Table A5-1, “Healthy Vegetarian Eating Pattern: Recommended Amounts of Food from Each Food Group at 12 Calorie Levels,” make the choices easy to follow. You can find even more reader-friendly Dummies-style info on this subject in Plant-Based Diet For Dummies, by Marni Wasserman (Wiley).
Regular physical activity is one of the simplest — and most important — things you can do on your own to improve your health.
According to the Department of Health and Human Services’ 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (online at www.health.gov/paguidelines/guidelines/
), healthy adults need at least 2.5 hours of moderately intense physical activity each week, including muscle-strengthening exercises on two or more days each week. You won’t be surprised to read that one chart in the new Guidelines, Figure I-2 to be exact (“Percentage of Adults Meeting the Physical Activity Guidelines”), shows that American adults aren’t up to snuff. So get moving.
When you take in more calories from food than you use up running your body systems (heart, lungs, brain, and so on) and doing a day’s physical work, you end up storing the extra calories as body fat. In other words, you gain weight. The reverse also is true. When you spend more energy in a day than you take in as food, you pull the extra energy you need out of stored body fat, and you lose weight.
You don’t have to be a mathematician to reduce this principle to two simple equations in which E stands for energy (in calories), > stands for greater than, < stands for less than, and W stands for the change in weight:
It’s not Einstein’s theory of relativity, but you get the picture.
For real-life examples of how the energy-in, energy-out theory works, stick your bookmark in this page and go to Chapter 3 to find out how to calculate the number of calories a person can consume each day without pushing up the poundage.
Even being mildly active increases the number of calories you can wolf down without gaining weight. The more strenuous the activity, the more plentiful the calorie allowance. Suppose that you’re a 25-year-old man who weighs 140 pounds. The formula in Chapter 3 shows that you require 1,652 calories a day to run your body systems. Clearly, you need more calories for doing your daily physical work, simply moving around, or exercising.
Weight control is a good reason to step up your exercise level. But it isn’t the only one. Here are four more:
There are three basic types of activity to strengthen heart and lungs, muscles, and bones.
Yes. No. Maybe. And who knows?
On the plus side, the Guidelines offer a template for building a healthful diet.
On the down side, not many people take the time to do the building. It is impossible to prove a negative, so there is no way to say whether there would be even more overweight Americans without the Guidelines. What we know for sure is that obesity exploded in America while the Guidelines were available.
As a result, the release of the 2015–2020 Guidelines, like the publication of the previous seven editions, is likely to trigger specific criticisms from various corners of the food and nutrition world. In general, the critiques may echo broad complaints such as the following:
Nonetheless, the Guidelines, imperfect though they may be, do offer guidelines on how to eat smart.
To encourage that, the authors want people to work together toward a common goal: to create partnerships with food producers, suppliers, and retailers to convince them to increase access to foods that align with the Dietary Guidelines, and to continue to promote the availability of healthful food and food products in restaurants, as well as promote participation in physical activity programs offered in various settings.
Life is not a test. No one loses points for failing to follow the USDA/HHS advice every single day of the year.
So this may be the real rule: Let the good times roll every once in a while. Then, after the party’s over, compensate. For the rest of the week, go back to your exercise regimen and back to your healthful menu emphasizing lots of the nutritious, delicious foods that should make up most of your regular diet.
In the end, you’re likely to have averaged out to a desirable amount with no fuss and no muss and be right in line with that headline from the first page of the 2000 Guidelines that I mention at the beginning of this chapter: “Eating is one of life’s greatest pleasures.”