This chapter examines the extensive evidence for textile production and working at this site: the full scope of the evidence, and its chronological range is set out in the introduction below. Textile-related finds constituted 11.34% of the recorded finds from the site. Because of the large quantities of artefacts recovered relating to this activity, illustration of the finds has had to be selective.
***
9.1 Introduction
The textile crafts at Flixborough are represented by objects associated with fibre-processing, spinning, weaving, cutting and stitching. Due to the poor preservation of organic materials at this site, there are no wooden tools present, but there are enough artefacts made from stone, clay, bone and metal, to act as representatives of each of these crafts. Only dyeing – if it was ever practised at Flixborough – has left no material evidence.
Altogether there are 1,104 items connected with textile production (1,134 if iron shears are included), most of which come from between Period 3, Phase 3b and Period 6. The different classes of object existed side-by-side through these phases, so that it may be concluded that raw flax and wool were brought to the site and made up into textiles, and then clothing, throughout the main site periods, from the 8th to the early 11th century. A summary of the objects is presented in FIG. 9.1.
Analysis of the evidence shows that certain aspects of textile production at the site changed with time. The Period 4, Phase 4ii artefacts, for example, indicate some form of specialised production, which continued into Period 5, Phase 5a, but disappeared during Phase 5b. The Period 6 evidence in itself is also particularly informative, as it presents a marked contrast with urban sites of the same date in terms of textile technology, and this in turn must have had social and economic implications. The artefacts will be described here, and the significance of this important body of material is discussed further in Volume 4, Ch. 6.
9.2 Fibre processing
Fragments of a wool-comb, no. 2504 (RF 11777/11778. FIG. 9.2), were recovered from an unstratified deposit. This is the typical Anglo-Saxon form of wool-comb, with a rectangular, iron-bound head and two rows of relatively short iron teeth, 93mm long. The wooden head that the iron would have encased, and the wooden handle are no longer present. Wool-combs of this sort were used in pairs to prepare wool for spinning. Better preserved combs, often in pairs, have been found at a number of Middle and Late Anglo-Saxon sites, the earliest being from 7thcentury Lechlade, Gloucestershire (Ottaway 1992, 538–40; Boyle et al. 1998, 58–9, 156, and 192–3). They probably continued in use until the 13th or 14th century, when they were displaced by the modern long-toothed wool-comb (Walton Rogers 1997, 1720–1, 1727–30).
A further 194 iron spikes were recovered from the excavation, 102 from stratified deposits (FIG. 9.1). Spikes of this sort are often assumed to be teeth from wool-combs, but there is another tool, the flax heckle, which has teeth of a similar nature. Heckles consist of a block of iron spikes set vertically in a wooden mount, and are used to split flax into individual fibres at the final stage of processing, prior to spinning. Their teeth are straight and sharp-tipped, and range from 40 to 200mm in length; they are mostly set into the wooden mount without the aid of an iron base-plate, although there are some exceptions to this rule on the Continent. The spikes from wool-combs are more standardised, at 90–110mm long, with a rounded rectangular cross-section (corrosion can make this look more angular); they have an almost imperceptible curve at the tip, and they sometimes retain remains of the iron base-plate 10–15mm from the base of the spike.
At Flixborough, there is a cluster of especially sharp-tipped spikes, 66–108mm long, from the fill of the ditch in Area G in Period 4, Phase 4ii (Loveluck and Atkinson, Volume 1, Ch. 5; see ADS archive distribution plot for Phase 4ii). Some of these spikes have clearly been embedded in a deep block of wood, and most, if not all, can be confidently identified as flax heckle spikes. This area is away from the main buildings, and supports the historical and archaeological evidence that flax processing was largely carried out in the open air (Walton Rogers 1997, 1796–9). In later phases, flax heckle spikes were found towards the centre of the site, in and around the dumps (Phase 5a, contexts 5139, 5193; Period 6, context 5988), but they rarely occurred in the same deposits as wool-comb teeth.
Spikes confidently identified as wool-comb teeth (90–110mm long, rounded rectangular section, with remains of an iron base-plate), were found in the central dumps in Period 5, phases 5a – contexts 5860, 5885; and 5b – contexts 3081, 3082 and 6344, (see ADS archive distribution plot for phases 5a and 5b). By Period 6, Phase 6iii, however, wool-comb spikes were concentrated in the eastern quadrant of the site, in site areas C and F (Volume 1, FIG. 2.3 and FIG. 7.10; Loveluck and Atkinson, Volume 1, Ch. 7). This reflects the general shift in occupation towards the east during the course of the 10th century (Loveluck and Atkinson, Volume 1, Ch. 7; Loveluck, Volume 4, Ch. 2). Wool-combing, unlike flax processing, was an indoor craft, and wool-combs tend to follow habitation more closely than flax heckles.
9.3 Spinning
Once the wool had been combed and the flax heckled, the fibres would be ready for spinning. The craft of spinning is represented by 62 spindle whorls, made from stone, lead, clay and bone (FIGS 9.3–9.6). Each of these would have been mounted on the end of a wooden spindle and used to give twist to fibres being drawn from a distaff. As already noted, wooden tools such as distaffs and spindles were not preserved at Flixborough.
Stone spindle whorls (FIG. 9.3)
Of the 48 stone whorls, 47 are hemispherical, or near-hemispherical, a type which was prevalent in the Humber region of Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire from the 7th to the 10th centuries (Walton Rogers 1997, 1736–41). This form of whorl has one flat face at the top (Form A1, FIG. 9.3. Nos 2515, 2517, 2521, 2523, 2525, and 2536–7; RFs 3512, 4001, 5498, 5830, 6000, 11518, 11543) or one large flat face at the top and one small flat face at the bottom (Form A2, FIG. 9.3. Nos 2545–6; RFs 10174, 11051). The whorls of this type from Period 6 are from the ‘dark soil’ refuse deposits above the earlier dumps, and have the typically small spindle hole, 6–9mm diameter, of Early and Middle Anglo-Saxon whorls. On typological grounds, it seems likely that these Period 6 whorls are residual, and the Phase 5b (late 9th century) whorls are therefore the latest confidently dated stone whorls from Flixborough. A single stone whorl, no. 2553 (RF 6290) from Phase 3bv–4ii, is an early example of the cylindrical/doughnut-shaped whorl, Form B, which was already in use in Yorkshire by the 8th century, but was not common until the later 10th century (Walton Rogers 1997, 1736–9).
The stone whorls are made from the types of limestone, chalk, siltstone and mudstone which can be found in the Yorkshire-Lincolnshire region, and some of the raw materials may have been collected quite close to the Flixborough site (see Gaunt below).
A review of stone spindle whorls from British sites down to the 14th century has shown that most whorls reflect the geology of the region in which they have been found (Walton Rogers 2000, 2531, Table 251). There is, therefore, a certain amount of overlap in raw materials, between Flixborough and 8th- to 11th-century York, 50 km to the north-west (Gaunt in Walton Rogers 1993, 1268; Gaunt in Walton Rogers 1997, 1736). This does not mean that there was any specialist production centre – the wide variation in shape and technology of production shows otherwise – merely outcrops of similar rocks in different parts of the region and perhaps also common collecting grounds for raw materials.
Almost all of the Flixborough stone whorls are lathe-turned, which contrasts with York, where three-quarters of the Anglo-Saxon whorls were either cut with a knife or ground to shape. Only two of the Flixborough whorls have an incised-line decoration (no. 2517; RF 4001, Period 2; and no. 2546; RF 11051, Phase 5a; FIG. 9.3), which is much less than the 15% of decorated stone whorls at York (Walton Rogers 1993, fig. 625; 1997, fig. 808) and 25% at Flaxengate, Lincoln (Mann 1982, figs 21–2). Altogether, the Flixborough whorls are more standardised and uniform than other Anglo-Saxon collections in the region.
The Flixborough whorls are also especially small. The 38 Form A1 whorls weigh only 7–33g, most being between 10g and 20g. The other stone whorls are a similar range of weight, although there are two heavier Form A2 whorls, one 48g (no. 2545; RF 10174), from Period 5b and another 37g (no. 2542; RF 5049), unstratified. In York, Form A whorls weighed 9–63g, the heavy, medium and light whorls being used together in the same phases. At Flaxengate, the stone whorls weighed 6–42g, most being 20–30g (Mann 1982, 22–57). In the Early Anglo-Saxon settlement at Mucking, Essex, stone whorls were few, but the potsherd and clay whorls weighed 14–60g, most being 25–45g (Hamerow 1993, 65). The significance of the lightweight whorls in Periods 4 and 5a at Flixborough will be discussed further in Volume 4, Ch. 6.
A note on the geology of the stone spindle whorls by Geoff Gaunt
THE LIMESTONE SPINDLE WHORLS
The 13 spindle whorls with a lithology exemplified by that of no. 2507 (RF 795) are made from fine-grained silty, and in some whorls slightly quartzitic or ‘sandy’, limestone. In no. 2519 (RF 4401) and a few other whorls the calcitic grains are seen to be mainly microbioclastic, i.e. consisting of finely comminuted fossil fragments. Microscopic flattish voids parallel to the grain layers are characteristic of the texture.
Seven spindle whorls exemplified by no. 2508 (RF 902) have an almost identical lithology to no. 2507 (RF 795) et al. except for being slightly coarser-grained (but still finegrained in absolute terms), less silty and apparently devoid of quartz ‘sand’. Three more spindle whorls exemplified by no. 2513 (RF 2756) are also almost identical except that their grain-size range extends slightly into the medium grade; they appear not to be silty and have hardly any microscopic voids.
The constituents and textures of the three lithologies exemplified by nos 2507–8 and 2513 (RFs 795, 902 and 2756) are so precisely similar that they suggest a common depositional environment and probably, therefore, a common provenance for all of the relevant 23 spindle whorls.
There are two possible local provenances. One comprises thin limestones in the upper part of the Scunthorpe Mudstones, but below the Frodingham Ironstone (Gaunt et al. 1992, 32–4). These limestones crop out on the west-facing scarp slope east of the site of the Flixborough excavations, locally less than 1km away. Other thin, but more coarsely bioclastic, limestones in the same sequence are considered to be the source of some of the padstones and sills from the buildings. The other possible local provenance is the Cleatham limestone, a thin basal layer within the Raventhorpe Beds, which comprise the lowest part of the Lincolnshire Limestone (Gaunt et al. 1992, 46–8). This thin limestone crops out irregularly on top of the Lincoln Edge, being nearest to the Flixborough site around Roxby, 4 to 6km to the north-east.
Considered together, the lithologies of the 23 spindle whorls reviewed here are most closely comparable to those in the thin limestones in the upper part of the Scunthorpe Mudstones, although that of the three whorls exemplified by no. 2513 (RF 2756) is admittedly equally comparable to mainly fine-grained oolith-free varieties of the Cleatham limestone occurring near its northern limit of outcrop west of Winterton. If, however, all the 23 limestone whorls considered here are from the same provenance, then on lithological grounds, and also those of proximity, the upper part of the Scunthorpe Mudstones is the more likely of the two possible local sources.
THE CHALK SPINDLE WHORLS
Of 19 spindle whorls made from chalk (nos 2527 and 2531, RFs 6282 and 6335, being from the same whorl), seven of them are from fine-grained varieties that imply a provenance in the circa 26m-thick Ferriby Chalk Formation in the lowest part of the >250m-thick Chalk Group, and another four have a very fine to fine-grained texture suggestive of the same provenance. The remaining eight spindle whorls have entirely very fine-grained textures and could have provenances in almost any part of the Chalk Group, which crops out widely in the Lincolnshire and Yorkshire Wolds (Gaunt et al. 1992, 77).
The manufacture of spindle whorls from chalk erratics is unlikely because such erratics (except recently formed beach pebbles) are degraded by weathering and ground-water, and would be insufficiently robust or durable for this purpose. In the nearest chalk-bearing deposits to the site of the Flixborough excavations, those occurring between Winteringham and Winterton, the degradation is such that ‘the number of chalk pebbles decreases markedly upwards in the top 1m, and they are virtually absent at the surface’ (Gaunt et al. 1992, 119).
It is likely, therefore, that the spindle whorls were made from chalk obtained directly from outcrops by excavating through the weathering zone into ‘fresh’ rock, a task more easily accomplished on steep slopes than flattish ground. Perhaps the relative abundance of spindle whorls made from Ferribly Chalk (despite this sequence comprising only about 10 percent of the entire Chalk Group) relates to the fact that the Ferriby Chalk crops out on the steep scarp slopes of the Wolds. Moreover, chalk does not readily occur in natural exposures except on sea cliffs, but the Ferriby Chalk is exposed naturally along South Ferriby Cliff, and may well have been similarly exposed on the landslip scars between Horkstow and Saxby All Saints. Whatever the provenances, the distances from the Flixborough site suggest a degree of specialist extraction.
***
Spindle whorls in other materials
The remaining fourteen spindle whorls consist of three bone, four clay and seven lead. The second bone example, no. 2561 (RF 1989, from phases 5b–6i), has been lathe-turned to the same A1 shape as the stone whorls, and has the curious feature of a lead sleeve lining the spindle hole (FIG. 9.4). Another, no. 2561 (RF 5745 from Phase 5b), has been lathe-turned to A2 shape (FIG. 9.5) and is made from antler pedicle, which is the part of the deer’s skull from which the antler rises (all bone identification by S. O’Connor). This cutting of bone to shape for spindle whorls is quite common in the Early and Middle Anglo-Saxon period (e.g. Brodribb et al. 1972, 122, 124; Hamerow 1993, 65; Eagles and Evison 1970, 45), but in the 10th and 11th centuries cattle femur heads, which have a naturally domed surface, began to be used instead (Woodland 1990, 217; Walton Rogers 1997, 1743). There is one example of this later type from Flixborough, no. 2560 (RF 1555) from Phase 6iii (FIG. 9.5).
Two of the clay whorls have also been shaped into A1 forms: no. 2565, RF 3044, Phase 5a–5b; and no. 2563, RF 6892, Phase 6iii–7 (no. 2563, RF 6892 is shown in FIG. 9.6); a third is doughnut-shaped form B (no. 2564, RF 14126, unstratified; FIG. 9.6). They therefore reflect the shapes of the stone whorls. The fourth clay whorl, RF 10374 from Phase 3biii, is of the rounded biconical, Form C; a type which is rare in this region. Clay whorls are more common in areas where there are no easily accessible outcrops of rock, such as the Thames basin (Walton Rogers 2000), and at Mucking, situated on Essex clay, where there were nine flattened-globular and rounded-biconical clay whorls (Hamerow 1993, 65). This, then, could be a rare example of a whorl from outside the region.
Six of the seven lead whorls have been cast in a mould, with a former for the spindle hole, but the seventh, no. 2559 (RF 12449), has been cut by hand. Most have been made in the same Form A1 and A2 shapes as the stone whorls, which suggests that they originated in Middle or Late Anglo-Saxon levels, although five are from unstratified deposits and one is from upper levels of the site (no. 2555; RF 333, Period 7). There was evidence for the manufacture of lead whorls in the same shapes at 10th-century Coppergate (Walton Rogers 1997, 1799). A single lead whorl, no. 2558 (RF 12448), also unstratified, is biconical, with a decoration of raised dots (FIG. 9.4). This type is sometimes attributed to the Roman period (Wheeler 1958, 50, Pl. III), but the pattern of raised dots is much more common in lead whorls from post-medieval sites (Oakley and Hall 1979, 287, Ivens et al. 1995, 359).
Several of the stratified spindle whorls are distributed close to buildings and two are from occupation deposits from inside buildings (no. 2517, RF 4001, Building 20, Period 2; and no. 2550, RF 5419, Building 7, Period 6, Phase 6i), exactly as they were at Coppergate (Walton Rogers 1997, fig. 841); the rest are all from the central dumps. Spindle spinning is an easily portable craft, and spindle and distaff were sometimes carried out into the fields in later times. At Flixborough and at Coppergate, however, the evidence suggests that spinning was largely practised indoors, or at any rate close to buildings.
9.4 Weaving
Weaving at Flixborough is represented by pin-beaters and loom-weights. The loom-weights indicate the use of the warp-weighted loom, in which the loom frame is leant against a wall, and the warp (the vertical threads) suspended from the top beam and tensioned with weights at the bottom (Walton Rogers 1997, fig. 812). Double-ended pin-beaters are used with this loom as an all-purpose hand tool, to pick out misplaced threads, to strum across the warp to even out tension, and to push the weft (horizontal threads) loosely into position. Iron sword-beaters were also used with this loom, to beat up the weft, but they seem to have been regarded as valuable objects, and are more often found deliberately placed in Early Anglo-Saxon women’s burials (e.g. Walton Rogers 1998), rather than lost or discarded in areas of habitation such as this.
Pin-beaters (FIG. 9.7; PL. 9.2)
There are two complete pin-beaters and fragments of eleven more (a selection is shown in FIG. 9.7). All are made from animal long-bones (identified by S. O’Connor). The complete ones are of the double-ended form, which has a point at either end and a round cross-section; and the incomplete ones appear to be mainly of the same type. The double-ended pin-beater is firmly associated with the warp-weighted loom and, significantly, the six pin-beaters from phases 4ii to 6iii (FIG. 9.1) all come from deposits which have also yielded loom-weights (contexts 3758, 6472, 3451 and 6300). Three pin-beaters have a band of incised lines around the girth (nos 2568 and 2570–1; RFs 2226, 3577, 7246, FIG. 9.7; PL. 9.2), and where the surface is well preserved it has a high polish from use. These incised bands are often called ‘decoration’, although experience with the warp-weighted loom suggests that they are in fact intended to help the hand keep a grip on the polished surface.
Bone pin-beaters are well known from Anglo-Saxon sites, but the Flixborough ones are particularly long and slender. The two complete pin-beaters, nos 2573 and 2575 (RFs 12158 and 14042; FIG. 9.7), are 110mm long, and three of the incomplete ones were probably originally closer to 170mm in length. Diameters are mainly 6.0–8.0mm, except in the late examples, from Phases 6iii and 7 where they are 8.0–10.0mm. Anglo-Saxon pin-beaters recorded so far have been 80–160mm long and 8–12 mm diameter, but the shorter, sturdier types are the most common. At Århus, Denmark, there is a more slender example, 136mm long, 6mm wide, from the same ceramic phase as a cutoff piece of linen warp (Andersen et al. 1971), and it is possible that these slim pin-beaters should be associated with linen production. The appearance of the thicker pin-beaters at Flixborough coincides with an increase in the weight of loom-weights between Period 5, Phase 5b and the end of Period 6, and probably also with an increase in the production of wool cloth in these later periods of occupation.
There were 756 separate finds of loom-weights, but, since many of these were collections of fragments, they have been summarised by weight for FIG. 9.8. There are only 12 complete loom weights (see FIGS 9.10–9.12 for the majority of these), but confident estimates of original dimensions and weights could be obtained from a further 230 almost complete examples, and the discussion of size and weight, below, is based on these 242 weights.
The weights are all hand-made from an estuarine clay which was probably collected from the Trent Valley close to Flixborough (Vince, petrological analysis, ADS archive). The evidence of an un-worked bar of clay, no. 2572 (RF 9997), in association with half-finished (no. 2751; RF 9996) and unfired (no. 2750; RF 9982) weights in context 6885, Phase 4ii, adjacent to a dump containing partially fired loom-weights and a pin-beater (context 3758), suggests that weights were being made on the site, not far from where they were used. Further half-made and nonfired weights were found in another central dump, context 8108, Phase 5a. Non-fired (or perhaps under-fired) weights were also found in deposits from Period 5, Phase 5b and Period 6, but in these cases, it is possible that they represent loom-weights used ‘in the green’ (unfired), as seems to have been the case with many of the weights from the Anglo-Saxon villages at West Stow, Suffolk (West 1985 II, 138), and Mucking, Essex (Hamerow 1993, 68).
To make each weight, the clay has been worked into a round shape and then the central hole has been pushed through, so that there is often a flange around the hole on one side. They occur in a variety of shapes, ranging from flat quoit-shaped to near-spherical. Anglo-Saxon loom-weights are often divided into ‘annular’, in which the hole is wider than the thickness of the ring; ‘intermediate’, in which the hole is narrower; and ‘bun-shaped’, in which the hole is small. Broadly speaking, annular is regarded as Early, intermediate as Middle, and bun-shaped as Late Anglo-Saxon (Hurst 1959, 23–25, reconsidered by Holden 1976, 310–11; and Hedges 1980, 87–93). At Flixborough, the weights are all bun-shaped and intermediate, as is to be expected of a Middle and Late Anglo-Saxon site, but the two types clearly existed side-by-side through all phases. There seems to be a better correlation between shape and weight, rather than between shape and date; the bun-shaped weights being mostly heavier than the intermediate ones. As a result, the number of bun-shaped weights rises and falls with the average weight in each phase (FIG. 9.8).
Many weights have a groove emerging from the central hole, where a thin cord has probably suspended the weight – although it is curious that some of these grooves seem to have been made before firing. Sixty-three weights also have impressed marks (cf. FIGS 9.9–9.11). These first appear in Phase 3b (7 examples), but are largely a Period 4 (44 examples) phenomenon, especially Phase 4ii (40 examples). The Phase 4ii marks include a large circle (at least 16 examples), a small circle (at least 6 examples), four dots in a square (seven examples), a double row of dots (two examples), and single deep, round marks evenly spaced around the weight (five examples); there is also a single example of a small impressed square from Phase 4ii–5a. Six weights with these designs also occur in Phase 5b and Period 6 deposits, almost certainly residually, as one example with a small circle from Phase 6iii (no. 2832; RF 3832, context 3989) fits a fragment from Phase 4ii (no. 2648; RF 3859, context 3758). In these later periods, however, some new marks appear. There are two examples of a ‘+’ mark enclosed in a circle, one from Phase 5b and the other from Period 6; and one example of a reversed, curled ‘S’ on a large weight from Period 6, Phase 6ii–6iii (no. 2812, FIG. 9.11).
Circular loom-weights were used by most of the Germanic peoples in northwest Europe, and those with impressed marks are best represented at trading centres with a well-to-do population, such as Dorestad (Roes 1965, 70), Haithabu (Graham-Campbell 1980, 21), Ribe (Bender Jørgensen 1991, 67ff) and Birka (Andersson, pers. comm.). They seem less common in England, although a large, undated bun-shaped weight from Binton, Warwickshire, has a mark which Mytum suggests has been made with a cattle-branding iron. This could well be true of the reversed curled ‘S’ from Period 6 at Flixborough, but the earlier Flixborough marks have more in common with the stamped decoration on Early Anglo-Saxon pottery (Hamerow 1993, 45–52): these marks seem to have been made with carved antler tines, such as those found at West Stow (West 1985 II, 125). The purpose of the marks is not entirely clear. They may have been a potter’s mark, an owner’s mark or an indicator of a set of standard weight. At Flixborough, the different marks in Period 4 are jumbled together in the dumps, so that there is no reason to suggest that they indicate different workshops.
Perhaps the most significant feature of the Flixborough loom-weights is the way in which their weight changes through the different periods (FIG. 9.9). Anglo-Saxon loom-weights most commonly weigh 150–500g, although the full range of recorded weights is 100–1460g. At Flixborough, the weights were especially light in Period 4, and heavier in Period 6. The average weights for the main phases are 337g for Period 3, Phase 3b; 236g for Period 4; 329g for Period 5; and 416g for Period 6; and if the residual material in Period 6 (weights with Phase 4ii-type impressed marks, found in Period 6 deposits directly above the Period 4 central dumps) is removed, the average weight for Period 6 is closer to 500g. The Period 4 weights are broadly speaking 120–350g and 70–110mm diameter, but their main cluster is around 200g and 80mm diameter. It is these small, standardised weights that most commonly have the impressed marks. A comparison can be made with the Early Anglo-Saxon village at Mucking, Essex, where weights were between 150g and 1000g, and 80–130mm diameter (Hamerow 1993 I, 67); and the farmstead at Middle Anglo-Saxon Old Erringham, Shoreham, West Sussex, where weights were between 532 and 1,396g, and 109 and 150mm diameter (Holden 1976, 315). Combined with the long slender pin-beaters and small spindle whorls, the Flixborough weights suggest some form of specialised production – possibly of finer, more lightweight fabrics – in Period 4.
In Period 3, Phase 3b and Period 4 most of the weights seem to have been deposited in the central dumps. In Period 5 (phases 5a–5b), however, there is a cluster of especially thin and flat weights, 180–220g, around Building 36/37, in contexts 256, 275, 503 and 515 (also context 3107 Phase 5a and, residually, 3427 Phase 5b–6). As there had been no previous dumping of loom-weights in that area, these are likely to represent a ‘set’ of loom-weights used in that building. They form a separate group from the heavier weights, which had started to appear in Period 5, Phase 5b, and which, by Period 6, Phase 6ii, were distributed over the eastern half of the site, along with the thicker pin-beaters (Loveluck and Atkinson, Volume 1, Ch. 7, FIG. 7.10; and ADS archive distribution plot for Phase 6ii–6iii).
The arrival of heavier weights with new impressed marks, in a different part of the site, in Period 6 provides clear evidence that the warp-weighted loom continued in use in this area into the second half of the 10th century. In contrast, in towns such as Winchester and York, the warp-weighted loom can be shown to have disappeared by about AD 900, and to have been replaced by the two-beam vertical loom (Keene 1990, 203–8; Walton Rogers 1997, 1799–1801). Outside Winchester, however, in the hamlet of Sparkford, the warp-weighted loom remained in use as late as the 11th century (Collis 1978). The Flixborough evidence confirms the late use of this loom in rural parts. The 10th-century changes in textile production are too complex to debate here (see instead, Volume 4, Ch. 6; Walton Rogers 1997 and 2001), but as far as Flixborough is concerned, it is important to note that the signs of specialised production visible in Period 4, Phase 4ii had disappeared by Period 6 and, in terms of weaving technology, the settlement had become something of a backwater, using an old style of loom and probably producing rather coarser types of cloth than formerly.
9.5 Cutting and stitching
After weaving, the cloth would be washed and pressed. It would then be ready for cutting and stitching into garments and soft furnishings.
Remains of 30 pairs of iron shears suitable for cutting cloth and yarn have been recovered from the site: 18 pairs, or fragments of pairs, in stratified deposits from Period 1, Phase 1b to Period 7, and 12 unstratified.
Shears (FIG. 9.13; PLS 9.3–9.4)
by Patrick Ottaway and Penelope Walton Rogers
All the shears appear to be, or to have been, very similar in form. The bows are slightly looped and there are no examples of the simple U-shaped bow common in the early Anglo-Saxon period. Viewed from the side the bows either have straight sides and widen gradually to the top (e.g. no. 2877; RF 9952), or are more distinctly formed and have convex sides (e.g. no. 2859; RF 325 – Period 7; PL. 9.3).
Three bows have internal nibs at the base: no. 2861 (RF 1864; phases 6ii–iii), on which they are particularly pronounced, and no. 2871 (RF 5482; Phase 4ii) and no. 2882 (RF 12147; Phase 6ii–iii). All the blades are very similar in form, having a straight back which curves in to the tip; this corresponds to knife blade back form C (see Ottaway, Ch. 5, above). The only exception is no. 2866 (RF 3587; phases 1b–2), a single blade which has an angle-back. The shoulders between blade and stem are in roughly equal measure horizontal, sloping, and concave. There are also four examples of stepped shoulders: nos 2871, 2873, and 2886–7 (RF 5482; Phase 4ii; RF 5660; Phase 4ii; RF 12333, unstratified; and RF 12627; unstratified), which are otherwise uncommon, although two Anglo-Scandinavian examples were recorded at York (Ottaway 1992, fig. 219, 2689–90). Other features to note include a moulded collar at the junction of bow and stem on the now fragmentary no. 2860 (RF 416; Phase 4ii) and short projecting ‘ears’ at the same place on no. 2868 (RF 4111, Phase 4ii). This latter feature has no parallel in England, but can be found on a pair of shears from the Viking ship from Oseberg, Norway (Grieg 1928, fig. 118). The surviving stem of no. 2890 (RF 13503, unstratified) has three grooves around it below the bow, and two in the centre. This is again a rare feature, but similar grooves can be seen on a 9th- to 10th-century pair of shears from York (22 Piccadilly sf352) and also on a pair from Hedeby (Westphalen 1993, Taf. 28, 3).
The overall length of the complete shears is from 100mm to 205mm, and the blades are from 43 × 9.5mm (no. 2891, RF 13510) to >150 ×15mm (no. 2867, RF 3749). At least one pair, no. 2875 (RF 6004), from a central dump in Phase 5a, represents the sort of shears with long shanks and short blades (overall length 144mm, blades 44 × 9mm), which are sometimes found in Anglo-Saxon women’s burials, suspended from the belt. These were probably used for small domestic tasks, such as snipping thread during sewing. Only the larger bladed examples would be suitable for cutting cloth.
Needles
by Penelope Walton Rogers, with investigative conservation by Ian Panter
Altogether there are 68 iron needles, seven copper alloy and six bone (FIG. 9.1), although it will be shown that some of the bone ones may be garment pins rather than sewing needles. The iron needles range from 25 to 47mm in length, and are 1.3 to 3.8mm thick. Investigation of those where the eye has been preserved, carried out by Ian Panter, has shown that at least 13 iron needles have round eyes and over 20 have long eyes. The round eyes appear to have been punched, as have two unusual needles with triangular (no. 2927; RF 8989) and rectangular (no. 2928; RF 9049) eyes. The long eyes have in a few cases been made by splitting the shank into a Y shape, and then re-joining it above the eye (nos 2932–3, 2939 and 2941; RFs 11475, 11772, 13622, 13656). Most, however, have an oval eye punched into a long groove. The latter may have been made with two punches, one long to form the groove, and one round to perforate the needle, as described by Rollins for the more recent manufacture of needles (Rollins 1981, 8–9). Alternatively, they may have been made in a similar manner to the copper alloy needles described below. Most of the iron needles are rounded in cross-section, but some of the longer ones are more angular – usually triangular – in section (see below).
The seven copper alloy needles are alike in general appearance and method of manufacture. The complete examples are 43–58mm long, and 1.3–2.0mm thick. They are round in cross-section, but flatter towards the head. The eyes have a long tapering groove on either side, in which there is a punched oval eye. Examination of the grooves at ×10 magnification reveals longitudinal scratches, which suggest the grooves were made by drawing out the end of the needle with a strong pair of pincers, before punching through the eye. The six stratified copper-alloy needles come from phases 3b to 5a (FIG. 9.1), but it is possible that they are a discrete early to mid 9th-century type, as an example from Phase 5a, no. 2897 (RF 8497), comes from an area with much re-deposited Period 4 material.
The bone objects resembling needles are 63–93mm long, and 4.5–7.5mm thick. The shanks are round to oval in section, but the heads are slightly flatter. The eyes are oval in the early examples, and circular in those from Period 5, Phase 5b and Period 6. Needles such as these would function well as darning needles, for repairs to the coarser types of wool cloth, but the wear pattern, where visible, does not support this view. There is a modest amount of polish on nos 2900, 2901 and 2903 (RFs 766, 6037 and 6089), but this is not around the eye, where needles receive most wear, and in 766 it is clearly concentrated on the tip. This contrasts with three small bone needles from Coppergate, York, which had a very high degree of polish all over, with obvious signs of wear around the eye. It is possible that the Flixborough bone ‘needles’ are in fact garment pins of the sort which have a thong loop threaded through the eye, the loop being passed over the tip of the pin when in use. A pin of this sort, still with remains of the leather thong in the eye, was found crossways at the throat of a woman in a 7th-century burial at Castledyke, North Lincolnshire, and had probably been used to fasten the woman’s cloak (Grave 137, Drinkall and Foreman 1998, 75, 276, 290).
Even the objects confidently identified as sewing needles may not necessarily have been used on textiles. A group of longer iron needles with angular (mostly triangular) cross-sections were found in the same ditch as the flaxprocessing spikes (nos 2929, 2975 and unnumbered: RF 415, RF 2811, RF 9325 in Phase 4ii and RF 10539 in Phase 6iii). A needle with a sharpened, chamfered tip, no. 2966 (RF 9289), was also found in the ditch and there is another, no. 2926 (RF 8931), unstratified. Cordwainers (leatherworkers) use needles with triangular sections, and they frequently sharpen their needles with small hones. They also use needles which are curved lengthways, of which there is one unstratified example, no. 2935 (RF 12595). It may be suggested that leather goods were being stitched on the site, in an area separate from the buildings in which textile-making took place. In contrast, the simpler forms of iron needle, with round cross-sections, were mainly recovered from the central dumps, along with the copper alloy needles, bone needles/pins and other textile tools.
The Flixborough collection of needles and needle-like objects is comparable with the material from Late Anglo-Saxon Winchester (Biddle and Elmhirst 1990) and Anglo-Scandinavian York (Walton Rogers 1997, 1781–5). In these towns, iron needles were more numerous than copper alloy until the Anglo-Norman period, when copper alloy started to come to the fore; bone needles (and garment pins) occurred up until the end of the Anglo-Saxon period, and then tapered off rapidly after the Conquest. Among the metal needles, round eyes and long eyes were used contemporaneously, the round eyes becoming more common in later periods. When lengths and thicknesses of needles are compared, it becomes clear that the Flixborough collection, including the leatherworking needles, falls towards the finer end of the scale. The iron needles from Anglo-Scandinavian Coppergate, York, for example, were 23–73mm × 1.0–5.0mm, compared with 25–47mm × 1.3-3.8mm for Flixborough; the copper alloy from Coppergate were mainly 50–80mm × 2.0mm, compared with 43–58mm × 1.3–2.0mm at Flixborough. Here, once again, the Flixborough material indicates finer, more delicate work.
Rubbing stones (FIG. 9.15)
by Lisa M. Wastling
Six stones were recovered from Flixborough which, although polished, do not fit into the hones or accepted slick-stone categories. The stratified examples were all recovered from 9th- to 10th-century deposits. These types of tools may be under-represented in the archaeological record, as they are difficult to categorise, and can be overlooked during excavation.
Three are of chalk, all bar-shaped, and of small size. There are a number of very similar objects to these at Flaxengate, Lincoln, found in 11th–12th century levels (Mann 1982, fig. 45, 415–19, 423). No. 2983 (RF 6267) appears to be a reused fragment of a larger wedge-sectioned rubber, which has split along the bedding plane of the chalk, and subsequently has been smoothed along these planes. No. 2988 (RF 342) has been worn obliquely at both ends, in a similar way to two examples at Lincoln (ibid., 65). The limestone example, no. 2986 (RF 5290), has a plano-convex section, similar to that of slick-stones, though the wear patterns and material are incompatible with textile finishing.
Although nos 2987 and 2984 (RFs 244 and 3162) do not possess the usual circular plano-convex form of the glass slick stones and some stone examples, both appear to bear comparable wear marks, when examined at ×20 magnification. Their fine-grained, hard lithology would also seem to be consistent with this function. Though these are not of the usual form, they may still have been of use for finishing or the flattening of seams.
All of these stones are likely to have been used in the finishing of materials, probably of leather and textiles, in the case of nos 2987 and 2984 (RFs 244 and 3162).
9.6 Summary
The evidence of the artefacts presented above demonstrates that a full range of textile crafts was in action at Flixborough from the mid 8th to the early 11th century. Flax was prepared, wool combed, yarn spun, cloth woven and garments stitched throughout this period of time. The tools used for these processes – the two-row wool-comb, the suspended spindle with hemispherical spindle whorl, the warp-weighted loom with circular clay loom-weights and double-ended pin-beaters – are all typically Anglo-Saxon, and many of the textiles found in Anglian cemeteries of the region, or on later Anglo-Saxon habitation sites, could have been made with them. The tools themselves are made from raw materials available within the region, and the loom-weights, for example, seem to have been made in the immediate vicinity of the looms with which they were used.
The small, lightweight nature of many of the Flixborough textile tools has been repeatedly emphasised above, and it has been suggested that this indicates the production of fine qualities of cloth and clothing, as would be appropriate for a high-status settlement. Signs of this specialised production had already begun to appear in Period 3, Phase 3b, but are clearest in Period 4. The evidence from the boundary ditch was especially associated with flax production in Period 4, although wool was also being processed at this time. By Period 6, however, there is a marked increase in the weights of loom-weights, the thickness of pin-beaters and perhaps also the weights of spindle whorls. How quickly this change came about is not clear. Light weights were still present in Phases 5a–5b, at the same time as heavier ones, and it is possible that the process was a gradual one, which was only accomplished by Period 6 (although Loveluck regards the light weights as residual: Loveluck and Atkinson, Volume 1, Ch. 6; Loveluck Volume 4, Chs 2 and 6). By Phase 6ii, the focus of the settlement has shifted to the east, towards North Conesby (Loveluck, Volume 4, Ch. 2), and some of the heavier tools can be seen following this shift. Wool-combing is especially well represented in these later phases. The implications of this evidence are discussed further in Volume 4, Ch. 6.
Selective catalogue
Compiled by Penelope Walton Rogers, Chris Loveluck, Patrick Ottaway, Lisa M. Wastling and Geoff Gaunt
Fibre processing (FIG. 9.2)
The 194 individual spikes from the processing of flax and wool are listed in the ADS archive. Only the fragmentary wool-comb is presented here.
2504 |
Fragmentary wool-comb. Six spikes set in an iron baseplate; spikes in two rows. Two further spikes loose. Corroded rectangular sections. The two main fragments are illustrated. L.93mm. (FIG. 9.2). |
STONE: (47) |
|
Form A1 |
|
2505 |
Whorl |
2506 |
Whorl |
2507 |
Whorl |
2508 |
Whorl |
2509 |
Whorl |
2510 |
Whorl |
2511 |
Whorl |
2512 |
Whorl |
2513 |
Whorl |
2514 |
Whorl |
2515 |
Whorl |
Whorl |
|
2517 |
Whorl |
2518 |
Whorl |
2519 |
Whorl |
2520 |
Whorl |
2521 |
Whorl |
2522 |
Whorl |
2523 |
Whorl |
2524 |
Whorl |
2525 |
Whorl |
2526 |
Whorl |
2527 |
Whorl |
2528 |
Whorl |
2529 |
Whorl |
2530 |
Whorl |
2531 |
Whorl |
2532 |
Whorl |
2533 |
Whorl |
Whorl |
|
2535 |
Whorl |
2536 |
Whorl |
2537 |
Whorl |
2538 |
Whorl |
2539 |
Whorl |
2540 |
Whorl |
2541 |
Whorl |
Form A2 |
|
2542 |
Whorl |
2543 |
Whorl |
2544 |
Whorl |
2545 |
Whorl |
2546 |
Whorl |
2547 |
Whorl |
2548 |
Whorl |
2549 |
Whorl |
Form A1 or A2 |
|
2550 |
Whorl |
2551 |
Whorl |
Form B |
|
2552 |
Whorl |
2553 |
Whorl |
LEAD (FIG. 9.4) |
|
2554 |
Whorl |
2555 |
Whorl |
2556 |
Whorl |
2557 |
?Whorl |
2557a Whorl |
|
Complete, lead, deep hemispherical, irregularly cut, spindle hole asymmetrical (7 x 5mm, tapering). Form A1. |
|
2558 |
Whorl |
2559 |
Whorl |
BONE/ANTLER (FIG. 9.5) |
|
2560 |
Whorl |
2561 |
Whorl |
2562 |
Whorl |
FIRED CLAY/CERAMIC (FIG. 9.6) |
|
2563 |
Whorl |
2564 |
Whorl |
2565 |
Whorl |
2566. |
Whorl |
2567 |
Pin-beater |
2568 |
Pin-beater |
2569 |
Pin-beater |
2570 |
Pin-beater |
2571 |
Pin-beater |
2572 |
Pin-beater |
2573 |
Pin-beater |
2574 |
Pin-beater |
2575 |
Pin-beater |
2576 |
Pin-beater |
2577 |
Pin-beater |
2578 |
Pin-beater |
2578a Pin-beater |
|
Incomplete. Oval section. Very polished by wear. Distorted by burning. Calcined medium-sized mammal longbone. |
LOOM-WEIGHTS (FIGS 9.8–9.12)
(abbreviated catalogue)
There were 756 separately itemised finds (recorded find numbers) of loom-weights from Flixborough. Many of these were represented by bags of small fragments. In the accompanying table (FIG. 9.8), the total weight of fragments recovered from each context has been given. Only significant items have been described in detail in the catalogue.
Abbreviations
Wt. = weight of fragment
est.Wt. = estimated original weight of loom-weight
D. = diameter of loom-weight
est.D. = estimated original diameter of loom-weight
Th. = width of clay in ring when loom-weight laid flat and viewed from above
H. = depth of clay in ring when loom-weight laid flat and viewed from side
Hl.D. = diameter of central hole
Period 2, late 7th to early 8th century
2579 |
Tall D. section, Wt.186g, est.Wt.900g, est.D.110mm, Th.52 × H.54mm. |
Phase 2–3a, late 7th to mid 8th century |
|
2580 |
Round D-section, Wt.105g, est.Wt.550g, est.D.100mm, Th.36 × H.46mm |
2581 |
Flat section (quoit-shaped) Th.33, H.14 |
Phase 2–4ii, late 7th to mid 9th century |
|
2582 |
Complete, shallow asymmetrical D-section, three fine grooves. Radiating from centre, Wt.438g, D.106–109mm, Th.39–45mm, H.38mm, Hl.D.26–28mm (FIG. 9.10). |
2583 |
Approximately one-quarter, D-section with prominent flange around hole, Wt.25g, est.Wt.100g, est.D.75mm, Th.28 × H.28mm. |
2584 |
Asymmetrical D-section, H.50mm |
Phase 3a, early to mid 8th century |
|
2585 |
Unfired, round D-section, est.Wt.330g, est.D.80mm, Th.39 × H.41mm |
Phase 3a–3bv, early 8th to early 9th century |
|
2586 |
Irregular round D-section, four impressed dots evenly spaced, Wt.118g, est.Wt.180g, D.81, Th.26–32 × H.25–27mm |
Phase 3b, mid 8th to early 9th century |
|
2587 |
Quarter, round D-section, Wt.134g, est.Wt.525g, est. D.110mm, Th.44 × H.44mm |
2588 |
D-section, Wt.115g, est.Wt.275g, est.D.80mm, Th.35 × H.42mm |
2589 |
One block of four impressed dots and part of a second, Wt.12g |
2590 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.100g, est.Wt.400g, est.D.80mm, Th.36 × H.48mm |
2591 |
Quoit-shaped (shallow pointed D-section), Wt.112g, est. D.130–40mm |
?pointed D-section?, Wt.76g, est.Wt.500g, Th.42 × H.41mm |
|
Phase 3bi, early to mid 8th century |
|
2593 |
Round D-section, Th.37 × H.32mm |
Phase 3bi–3bv, mid 8th to early 9th century |
|
2594 |
Approximately half, sandy fabric under-fired or not fired; pointed D cross-section Wt.160.0, est.Wt.320g, D.87, Th.40 × H.40mm |
2595 |
Unfired sand in calcareous clay (different fabric from rest), D-section, Wt.147g, est.Wt.165g, D.78, Th.29 × H.31mm |
Phase 3bii, mid 8th to early 9th century |
|
2596 |
Asymmetrical section, Wt.154g, est.Wt.385g, est.D. 100mm, Th.39 × H.39mm |
2597 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.187g, est.Wt.600g, est.D.110mm, Th.45 × H.44mm |
2598 |
Shallow pointed D-section, Wt.91g, est.Wt.400g, Th.42 × H.38mm |
2599 |
Groove radiating from hole, Wt.142g, est.Wt.500g, est. D.>110mm |
2600 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.41g |
2601 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.140g, est.Wt.310g, D.99, Th.41 × H.38mm |
2602 |
Pointed D-section, very like RF 10521, Wt.134g, est. Wt.300g, D.96, Th.33 × H.41mm |
2603 |
Asymmetrical D-section, Wt.58g, Th.44mm |
2604 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.67g, Th.37 × H.38mm |
2605 |
Pointed D-section, flanges both sides, Wt.172g, est. Wt.350g, D.100, Th.36 × H.38mm |
2606 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.109g, est.Wt.300g, est.D.100mm, Th.40mm |
2607 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.71g, est.D.95mm, Th.37 × H.40mm |
2608 |
Round asymmetrical D-section, Wt.173g, est.Wt.600g, est. D.>110mm, Th.49 × H.48 |
2609 |
Round asymmetrical D-section, Wt.110g, est.Wt.475g, est. D.100mm, Th.46 × H.46mm |
Phase 3biii, mid 8th to early 9th century |
|
2610 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.78g, Th.38 × H.44mm |
Phase 3biii–3bv, mid 8th to early 9th century |
|
2611 |
Pointed D-section with flange, Wt.129g, est.Wt.290g, est. D.100mm, Th.33 × H.43mm |
Phase 3biv–3bv, mid 8th to early 9th century |
|
2612 |
Round D-section, groove radiating from hole, Wt.224g, est.Wt.550g, est.D.115mm, Th.42 |
Phase 3bv, mid 8th to early 9th century (probably early 9th century) |
|
2613 |
Wt.62g, est.D.>100mm, Th.39mm |
2614 |
Shallow pointed D-section, Wt.62g, est.Wt.240g, est. D.90mm, Th.40 × H.27mm |
2615 |
Flattened D-section, Wt.130g, est.D.90mm, Th.39 × H.29mm |
2616 |
Round D-section, hole off-centre, Wt.150g, est.Wt.160g, D.80, Th.32 × H.29mm |
2617 |
(Three-quarters), shallow wedge-shaped section, 265g, est. Wt.360g, D.108, Th.40 × H.37. |
2618 |
?unbaked, irregular section, Wt.89g, est.Wt.400g, Th.36 × H.31mm |
2619 |
Fired at low temp., wedge-shaped section, est.Wt.235g, est.D.110mm, Th.43 × H.36mm |
2620 |
Irregular, shallow wedge section, one deep impressed dot, Wt.63g, est.Wt.140g, D.90, Th.25–33 × H.19–23mm |
2621 |
Broad D-section, two impressed marks each consisting of four dots, Wt.78g, D.84, Th.27, H.27. (FIG. 9.12). |
2622 |
Broad D-section with slight flange, Wt.230g, est.Wt.290g, D.97, Th.36 × H.37mm |
2623 |
Fragments of more than one weight, one possibly unbaked |
2624 |
Round D-section, impressed dots in double row, Wt.96g, est.Wt.140g, D.80, Th.27mm |
2625 |
Impressed circle 15 × 17mm, Wt.50g, est.D.100mm |
2626 |
Wt.38g, est.D.>100mm |
2627 |
Fragments of more than one weight, (i) D-section, est.Wt. 300g, est.D.95mm, Th.38 × H.30 (ii) pointed D-section, smaller than (i), Wt.80g, est.Wt.160g, D.83, Th.23 |
Est.Wt.300g, est.D.90 mm |
|
2629 |
Wt.23g, est.D.85 mm |
2630 |
Grooves radiating from central hole, Wt.74g, est.Wt.160g, D.76, Th.22–26mm |
2631 |
Deep groove radiating from centre, Wt.106g, est. D.>100mm |
2632 |
Fired at low temp., one (or two?) impressed circles 16mm diam. Wt.226g, est.D.100 mm |
2633 |
Shallow D-section, Wt.94g, est.Wt.380g, est.D.90mm, Th.38 × H.36mm |
2634. |
Complete, round D-section, one groove radiating from hole, Wt.402g, est.Wt.410g, D.100, Th.40 × H.50–52mm, Hl.D.20mm. (FIG. 9.10). |
Phase 3bi–4i, mid 8th to early 9th century |
|
2635 |
Fragment of very large weight, Wt.358g, est.D.155mm, H.>65 × Th.>65mm |
2636 |
Groove radiating from hole. |
Period 4, early to mid 9th century |
|
2637 |
Complete, round D-section, elliptical hole 38 × 52mm, possibly annular (or eroded to this shape), Wt.620g, D.120–125, Th.38–43, H.45mm, Hl.D.38–52mm |
2638 |
Irregular D-section, 3 or 4 deep impressed dots 10mm wide. Evenly spaced, hole off-centre, Wt.515g, est.Wt.625g, D.103–110, Th.40–52 × H.48mm |
2639 |
Flattened pointed D, Wt.73g, est.D.100mm, Th.36 × H.29mm |
2640 |
Fragments, two parallel rows of impressed dots, Wt.42g |
Phase 4i, early to mid 9th century |
|
2641 |
Wt.63g, est.D.80mm |
2642 |
Fragment of large weight, Wt.111g, est.Wt.?600g, D.>135mm, Th.52mm |
2643 |
Wt.30g, est.D.80 mm |
Phase 4i–4ii, early–mid 9th century |
|
2644 |
Impressed with circle 17mm diam. Wt.3g |
Phase 4ii, mid 9th century |
|
2645 |
Small, wedge-shaped section, Wt.25g, est.Wt.120g, est. D.70mm, Th.25 × H.21mm |
2646 |
Wedge-section with flange, Wt.93g, est.Wt.200g, D.95, Th.28 × H.26mm |
2647 |
Pointed flat D-section, 2 sets impressed marks 4 dots each, Wt.170g, est.Wt.250g, D.95, Th.38 × H.>36mm |
2648 |
Pointed flattened D-section, impressed circle 12mm, fits RF 3832 from context 3989, Period 6, Wt.89g, est. Wt.180–200g, D.85mm, Th.35mm |
2649 |
Flattened D-section with flange, two impressed circles 17mm diam. Wt.179g, est.Wt.200g, D.89, Th.36 × H.20mm. |
2650 |
Impressed circle 17mm diam., fragments totalling Wt.208g, Th.34 × H.28mm |
2651 |
Impressed circle 17mm diam. Wt.16g |
2652 |
Two small deep circular impressed marks, Wt.71g, D.98, Th.31mm |
2653 |
Shallow D-section, Wt.31g, Th.36 × H.21mm |
2654 |
Circular to round-D section, Wt.85g, est.Wt.250g, D.87, Th.34mm |
2655 |
Fragments, including one with groove radiating from hole, Wt.46g |
2656 |
Complete, wedge-shaped section with flange, impressed with four dots arranged in square, Wt.163g, D.85, Th.33 × H.30mm. (FIG. 9.10). |
2657 |
Flattened D-section, est.D.110mm, Wt.102g, Hl.D.26mm |
2658 |
Irregular section, Wt.140g, est.D.75mm Th.33 × H.23–25mm |
2659 |
Includes one irregular flattened D-section, Th.33 × H.22mm |
2660 |
Includes one irregular D-section, Th.27 × H.20mm |
2661 |
Irregular section with flange, Wt.104, est.Wt.300g, est. D.105, Th.35 × H.30mm |
2662 |
Impressed circle of 15mm diam. Wt.10g |
2663 |
Shallow pointed D-section, Wt.84g, est.Wt.165g, D.85, Th.32 × H.22mm |
2664 |
Two impressed ovals 15–17mm diam., est.D.80mm |
2665 |
Asymmetrical section, Wt.62g, est.Wt.250g, est.D.100mm, Th.41 × H.35mm |
2666 |
Irregular, wedge-shaped section with flange, 3 impressed ovals 15 × 17mm, Wt.214g, est.Wt.330g, D.102, Th.36–9 × H.26–30mm |
2667 |
Pointed D-section, 2 deep impressed dots, Wt.54g, est. Wt.130g, D.80, Th.28 × H.28mm |
2668 |
Deep impressed dot, Wt.14g |
2669 |
Asymmetrical section, impressed mark, edge of circle, Wt.60g, est.D.100mm, Th.33 × H.25mm |
2670 |
Flattened D-section, impressed oval 15 × 17mm, Wt.53g, est.D.80, Th.31 × H.24mm |
2671 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.153g, est.Wt.185g, D.86, Th.36 × H.30mm |
2672 |
Deep impressed dot |
2673 |
Complete or near-complete, flattened round D-section, Wt.172g, est.Wt.180g, D.93 Th.37 × H.27mm, Hl.D.24mm |
2674 |
Flattened pointed D-section, Wt.79g, est.Wt.160g, est. D.84mm, Th.29mm |
2675 |
Parallel grooves emerging from central hole, Wt.70g |
2676 |
Est.D.80mm |
2677 |
Irregular section with flange, Wt.129g, est.Wt.320g, est. D.105mm, Th.37–41 × H.32mm |
2678 |
Flattened D-section, Wt.150g, est.Wt.200g, est.D.95mm, Th.33 × H.23mm |
2679 |
Section probably asymmetrical, Wt.145g, est.Wt.260g, D.97mm, Th.39 × H.28mm |
2680 |
Flange around hole, two impressed circles 11mm diam. Wt.60g, est.D.85mm (FIG. 9.12) |
2681 |
Wide wedge-shaped section, Wt.58g, est.Wt.130g, est. D.80mm, Th.34 × H.24mm |
2682 |
Flared hole 22–28mm diam. Wt.65g, est.D.>100mm |
2683 |
Round D-section, Wt.157g, est.Wt.175g, D.87mm, Th.28 × H.36mm |
2684 |
Two impressed circles 11–12mm diam. Wt.52g, est. Wt.300g, est.D.80mm |
2685 |
Impressed circle 17mm diam. Wt.55g |
2686 |
Impressed mark, edge of circle 19mm diam. Wt.21g |
2687 |
D-section, Wt.128g, est.Wt.155g, D.80mm, Th.23–28 × H.28mm |
2688 |
Fragment of fired clay, possibly not loom-weight, Wt.6g |
2689 |
Fragments fired at low temperature, total Wt.205g, largest 45 × 37 × 25mm |
2690 |
Fired at low temperature, pointed D-section, Wt.94g, Th.32mm |
2691 |
Fragments, one with impressed circle 17mm diam., total Wt.37g |
2692 |
Fragments, unfired, total Wt.87g |
2693 |
Wedge-shaped section, Wt.84g, est.D.100 mm, Th.42 × H.25 mm |
2694 |
Irregular pointed D-section, Wt.145g, est.Wt.190g, D.86, Th.29 × H.31mm |
2695 |
Fired at low temperature, quoit-shaped (flat with rounded edge), Wt.243g, est.Wt.330g, D.106, Th.38 × H.29 mm |
2696 |
?unbaked, Wt.55g |
2697 |
?unbaked, Wt.22g |
2698 |
D-section with flange, Wt.57g, est.Wt.180g, D.80, Th.22 × H.28 mm |
2699 |
Asymmetrical section with slight flange, at least two impressed circles 11–12mm, Wt.121g, est Wt.190g, D.86, Th.32 × H.29mm |
2700 |
Wedge-shaped section, Wt.35g, est.Wt.130g, est.D.75mm, Th.29 × H.18mm |
2701 |
Impressed circle 17mm diam. Wt.24g |
2702 |
Wt.15g, est.D.70mm |
2703 |
Pointed D-section, two grooves radiating from hole, Wt.157g, est.Wt.195g, D.83, Th.27 × H.33mm |
2704 |
Flattened D-section with flange, impressed circle 10–12 mm diam. Wt.125g, est.Wt.325g, Th.41 × H.30mm |
2705 |
Wedge section with slight flange, Wt.254g, est.Wt.500g, D.110, Th.41 × H.37mm |
2706 |
Est.D.80mm |
2707 |
D-section, irregular hole, Wt.100g, est.D.90mm, Th.34 × H.30mm |
Single deep impressed dot, Wt.10g |
|
2709 |
Impressed circle 9 × 11mm, Wt.10g |
2710 |
Round D-section, Wt.84g, est.Wt.350g, est.D.100mm, Th.35 × H.35mm |
2711 |
Complete, irregular pointed D-section with flange, radiating groove(s), evenly spaced impressed dots, Wt.140g, D.75–82, Th.26 × H.28–29mm, Hl.D.33mm. (FIG. 9.10). |
2712 |
Block of four impressed dots, Wt.25g, est.D.80mm, Th.33mm |
2713 |
Fragments, one with impressed incomplete circle 15mm diam., total Wt.18g |
2714 |
Fragments of more than one weight, including one irregular flanged section, Wt.101g, est.Wt.130g, D.82, Th.32, H.26 |
2715 |
Shallow D-section, Wt.110g, est.D.85mm |
2716 |
?unbaked, total Wt.128g |
2717 |
Block of 4 impressed dots |
2718 |
D-section, Wt.43g, est.Wt.170g, est.D.75mm, Th.27 × H.25mm |
2719 |
Impressed oval 15 × 20mm, Wt.34g |
2720 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.45g, est.Wt.200g, est.D.100mm, Th.30 × H.29mm |
2721 |
Flattened D-section, block of four impressed dots, Wt.56g, est.Wt.200g, est.D.95mm, Th.35 × H.27mm |
2722 |
Impressed oval 20 × 15mm, Wt.47g, Th.39 × H.23mm |
2723 |
?unbaked, 92g |
2724 |
Wt.56g, est.Wt.160g, est.D.80mm, Th.30mm |
2725 |
Pointed D-section, two parallel rows of impressed dots, Wt.101g, est.Wt.250g, est.D.90mm, Th.34 × H.30mm |
2726 |
Flat quoit-like shape, two impressed circles 15–16mm diam, Wt.61g, est.Wt.180g, est.D.80mm |
2727 |
Fragments, total Wt.274g, est.D.105mm, Th.42 mm |
2728 |
Asymmetrical section with flange, Wt.185g, est.Wt.210g, D.81mm, Th.2 × H.16mm |
2729 |
Asymmetrical section with flange, Wt.138g, est.Wt.200g, D.81mm, Th.29 × H.32mm |
2730 |
One set of four impressed dots, Wt.31g, est.D.80mm, Th.36 × H.20mm |
2731 |
Shallow wedge-shaped section, Wt.41g |
2732 |
Asymmetrical pointed D-section, Wt.63g, est.Wt.160g, D.80mm, Th.30 × H.29mm |
2733 |
Fragments of ?two weights, both shallow asymmetrical D-section, One with set of four impressed dots, total Wt.230g, est.Wt.120g each, est.D.80mm each, Th.33 × H.25mm |
2734 |
One set of four large impressed dots, Wt.37g. (FIG. 9.12). |
2735 |
Edge of impressed circle, Wt.2g |
2736 |
One set of four large impressed marks, Wt.11g |
2737. |
Pointed D-section, Wt.87g, est.Wt.170g, D.80mm, Th.26 × H.33mm |
2738 |
Wt.42g, est.D.85mm, Th.32 × H.18mm |
2739 |
D-section, Wt.84g, est.Wt.300g, est.D.90mm, Th.40 × H.35mm |
2740 |
Asymmetrical section, Wt.62g, est.Wt.300g, Th.38 × H.33mm |
2741 |
Pointed D, groove(s) radiating from hole, Wt.154g, est. Wt.210g, D.97mm, Th.30 × H.30 |
2742 |
Asymmetrical D-section, Wt.52g, est.Wt.200g, est. D.80mm |
2743 |
Pointed D-section with flange, Wt.61g, est.Wt.150g, est. D.80mm, Th.28 × H.27mm |
2744 |
Shallow pointed D-section, Wt.101g, est.Wt.200g, D.85mm, Th.30 × H.26mm |
2745 |
Grooves radiating from hole, two parallel rows of impressed dots, Wt.125g, est.Wt.220g, est.D.95mm, Th.31mm. (FIG. 9.12). |
2746 |
Wt.84g, est.D.100mm |
2747 |
D-section, Wt.68g, est.Wt.250g, est.D.100mm, Th.37 × H.30mm |
2748 |
D-section, Wt.59g, Th.32 × H.36mm |
2749 |
D-section, Wt.143g, est.Wt.245g, D.90mm, Th.27 × H.34mm |
Fragments, total Wt.50g, ?unfired |
|
2751 |
Complete, unfired or fired at low temperature, unfinished, D-section, but hole does not fully penetrate clay, Wt.150g, D.75mm, Th.26 × H.30mm. (FIG. 9.10). |
2752 |
Rectangular piece of unfired clay (not a loom-weight), 68 × 28 × 27mm, Wt. |
2753 |
Flattened D-section, Wt.87g, est.D.100mm, Th.43mm |
2754 |
Rounded rectangular section, Wt.35g, Th.28 × H.24mm |
Phase 4ii–5a, mid to late 9th century |
|
2755 |
Shallow D section, small deep impressed square, Wt.203g, est.Wt.300g, D.100mm, Th.41 × H.30mm. (FIG. 9.12). |
2756 |
Triangular section, flared hole, Wt.103g, est.Wt.206g, D.85mm, Th.29 × H.30–33mm |
Phase 5a, mid to late 9th century |
|
2757 |
Rounded D-section, Wt.79g, est.D.80–90mm |
2758 |
Not fired or possibly low-fired, D-shaped section, Wt.310g, est.Wt.425g, D.105mm, Th.48–52 × H.41mm |
2759 |
Th.30 × H.22mm |
2760 |
Impressed dots in a row, Wt.31g |
2761 |
Unfired, flattened pointed D-section, small, unfinished hole off-centre, Wt.190g, est.Wt.200g, D.90mm, Th.32–39 × H.26mm |
2762 |
Probably unfired, flattened pointed D-section, elongated hole off-centre, cf. RF 8825, Wt.155g, est.Wt.180g, D.87mm, Th.32–38 × H.25mm |
2763 |
Fragments, probably unfired, total Wt.88g |
2764 |
Unfired, quoit-shaped (flat pointed section), unfinished – hole does not penetrate clay, Wt.210g, est.Wt.300g, D.107mm, H.26–36mm |
2765 |
Clay fragment irregular shape, possibly not loom-weight, Wt.67g, |
2766 |
Wt.39g, est.D.75mm |
2767 |
Wt.68g, est.D.80mm |
Phase 5a–5b, mid 9th to early 10th century |
|
2768 |
Thin wedge-shaped cross-section, flange around hole, Wt.55g, est.Wt.200g |
2769 |
Thin wedge-shaped cross-section, Wt.33g, est.Wt.180g |
2770 |
Thin, rounded wedge-shaped cross-section, Wt.30g |
2771 |
Fragments of two weights, largest est.Wt.135g |
2772 |
Thin wedge-shaped cross-section, flange around hole, Wt.34g, est.Wt.220g |
2773 |
Groove radiating from hole, Wt.68g, Th.32mm |
2774 |
Wt.30g, est.D.100mm, Th.36 |
2775 |
Irregular section, Wt.232g, est.Wt.900g, est.D.150mm |
Phase 5b, late 9th to early 10th century |
|
2776 |
Complete, round D-section, Wt.511g, D.110–115, Th.36–40 × H.43, Hl.D.40mm. (FIG. 9.11). |
2777 |
Impressed circle 10 × 12mm, Wt.9g |
2778. |
Wedge-shaped section, Wt.146g, est.Wt.450g, est.D.100–110mm, Th.43 × H.41mm |
2779 |
Wt.43g, est.D.90mm |
2780 |
Wedge-shaped section, Wt.56g, est.D.80mm, Th.36 × H.31mm |
2781 |
D-section, Wt.80g, est.Wt.275g, est.D.90mm, Th.35 × H.42mm |
2782 |
Impressed circle 15 × 14 diam. Wt.4g |
2783 |
?unbaked |
2784 |
Groove radiating from hole, two impressed marks in form of +, Wt.12g |
Phase 5b–6i, late 9th to mid 10th century |
|
2785 |
Complete, irregular pointed D-section, hole off-centre, groove inside hole, Wt.498g, D.100–106, Th.39–48 × H.52–59mm. (FIG. 9.11). |
2786 |
Possibly unfired, total 21g |
2787 |
Round D-section, irregular hole, groove radiating from hole, Wt.261g, est.Wt.350g, D.99, Th.28–40 × H.50mm |
2788 |
Irregular round D-section, impressed dots arranged in square, Wt.76g, est.Wt.300g, est.D.90mm |
2789 |
D-section, Wt.104g, est.Wt.350g, est.D.80mm, Th.38 × H.39mm |
2790 |
Irregular round section, total Wt. 69g, Th.33 × H.30mm |
2791 |
Shallow round D-section, Wt.135g, est.Wt.270g, D.84mm, Th.37 × H.40mm |
2792 |
Complete, D-section, single groove radiating from centre, Wt.181g, D.83mm, Th.24–27 × H.30mm, Hl.D.32mm |
2793 |
Impressed circle 10–11mm diam. Wt.19g |
2794 |
Edge of impressed circle, Wt.6g |
Period 6, early 10th to early 11th century |
|
2795 |
Wedge-section with flange around hole, two impressed marks +, Wt.83g, est.Wt.250g, est.D.85–90mm, Th.40 × H.30mm, Hl.D.19–23 mm. (FIG. 9.12). |
Phase 6i, early to mid 10th century |
|
2796 |
Wedge-shaped section, Wt.42g, est.Wt.170g, est.D.80mm, Th.30 × H.23mm |
2797 |
Groove radiating from hole, Wt.27g |
2798 |
Wt.85g, est.D.90–100mm |
2799 |
Wedge-shaped section with flange, Wt.21g, est.D.80mm, Th.25 × H.26mm |
Phase 6i–6ii, early to mid 10th century |
|
2800 |
?unfired |
Phase 6ii, mid 10th century |
|
2801 |
Thin, flat, wedge-shaped cross-section, flange around hole, Wt.48g, est.Wt.300g |
2802 |
Angular D-section, Wt.282g, est.Wt.420g, D.97, Th.40 × H.50–3, Hl.D.17–18mm RF3661, Context 3610, Phase 6ii. |
2803 |
Pointed D-section, groove at edge of central hole, Wt.321g, est.Wt.390g, D.95mm, Th.40 × H.53mm |
2804 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.73g, est.D.100mm |
2805 |
Wt.54g, est.D.100mm |
2806 |
D-section, Wt.47g, est.Wt.275g, est.D.80mm Th.26 × H.35mm |
2807 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.198g, est.Wt.500g, est.D.100mm, Th.36 × H.57mm |
2808 |
Pointed D-section, two grooves radiating from hole, Wt.337g, est.Wt.400g, D.102mm, Th.39 × H.47mm |
2809 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.220g, est.Wt.625g, est.D.110mm, Th.47 × H.54mm |
Phase 6ii–6iii, mid 10th century to early 11th century |
|
2810 |
Asymmetrical section, Wt.147g, est.Wt.600g, est. D.100mm, Th.37 × H.43mm |
2811 |
Remains of groove |
2812 |
Irregular D-section, large impressed mark 42 × 35 mm (reversed curled S), Wt.485g, est.Wt.650g, D.110, Th.45–50 × H.55mm. (FIG. 9.11). |
2813 |
D-section, Wt.315g, est.Wt.400g, D.109mm, Th.45 × H.>50mm |
2814 |
Round D-section, Wt.25g, Th.23 × H.26mm |
2815 |
Shallow D-section, deliberate impressed marks, but not in pattern, Wt.85g, est.Wt.155g, D.84mm, Th.27 × H.23mm |
Phase 6iii, mid/late 10th to early 11th century |
|
2816 |
Wt.129g, est.Wt.375g |
2817 |
Irregular shape, approx. D-shape cross-section, Wt.39g |
2818 |
D-section, Wt.103g, est.Wt.450g, est.D.100mm |
2819 |
Irregular flattened D-section, Wt.45g, est.Wt.250g |
2820 |
RF 1562, Context 1440, Phase 6iii. |
2821 |
Fragment, roughly one quarter, asymmetrical D-section, Wt.96g, est.Wt.380g, est.D.95 mm, Th.37 × H.47 mm |
2822 |
Flattened asymmetrical D-section, Wt.211g, est.Wt.450g, est.D.97 mm, Th.47 × H.50mm |
2823 |
Tall D-section, Wt.64g, est.D.100mm, Th.35 × H.46mm |
2824 |
Round D-section, Wt.154g, est.Wt.575g, H.49mm |
2825 |
Wt.47g, est.D.110mm, Th.52mm |
2826 |
Irregular, rounded D-section, Wt.138g, est.Wt.625g, est. D.110mm, Th.35 × H.49mm |
2827 |
Round D-section, Wt.237g, est.Wt.350g, D.92, Th.33 × H. 43(+)mm |
2828 |
Irregular, D-section, Wt.71g, est.D.100mm |
2829 |
Complete, pointed D-section, Wt.426g, D.98–104, Th.42–45 × H.48mm, Hl.D.16–20mm |
2830 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.138g, est.Wt.575g, est.D.110mm, Th.43 × H.49mm |
2831 |
Wedge-shaped section with flange, Wt.84g, est.Wt.330g, est.D.90mm, Th.40 × H.32mm |
2832 |
Flattened D-section, impressed circle 12mm diameter, fits RF 3859(i), context 3758 (Period 5a), Wt.61g, est. D.85mm |
2833 |
Flattened D or wedge section, Wt.28g, est.D.85mm |
2834 |
Wt.133g, est.Wt.400g, est.D.100mm, Th.46 × H.35mm |
2835 |
Wt126g, est.Wt.425g, est.D.130mm |
Phase 6iii–7, mid/late 10th to 12th–14th century |
|
2836 |
Wedge-shaped section, Wt.100g, est.D.100mm, Th.42 |
2837 |
Quoit-shaped (shallow pointed section), Wt.64g, est. Wt.160g, D.79, Th.34 × H.21mm |
2838 |
Wt.42g, est.D.100mm |
2839 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.56g |
Unstratified |
|
2840 |
Regular D-shaped cross-section, Wt.135g, est.Wt.300g, D.91mm, Th.36 × H.37mm |
2841 |
Round D cross-section, hole flared, Wt.145g, est. Wt.600g |
2842 |
Wt.92g, est.Wt.550g |
2843 |
Impressed circle 17mm diam. Wt.6g |
2844 |
Pointed D-section, Wt.67g, est.Wt.240g, est.D.80mm, Th.31 × H.25mm |
2845 |
Wt.116g, est.D.90mm |
2846 |
Asymmetrical D-section, Wt.170g, est.Wt.410g, D.100mm, Th.49 × H.42mm |
2847 |
Tall D-section, deep groove formed before firing, Wt.134g, est.Wt.475g, est.D.90mm, Th.40 × H.53mm |
2848 |
Shallow wedge-shaped section, Wt.32g, est.Wt.120g, est. D.75mm, Th. 27 × H.18mm |
2849 |
Pointed D-section, groove radiating from hole, Wt.325g, est.Wt.350g, D.103mm, Th.37–40 × H.33–40 |
2850 |
Flattened round D-section, Wt.136g, est.Wt.260g, D.95mm, Th.36 × H.32mm |
2851 |
Round D-section, Wt.125g, est.Wt.500g, est.D.100mm, Th.48 |
2852 |
Round D-section, Wt.55g, Th.38 × H.42mm |
2853 |
Complete, asymmetrical D-section, irregular, two grooves radiating from hole, Wt.242g, D.85–91, Th.33×40 × H.31mm, Hl.D.20–22mm |
2854 |
Wt.115g, est.D.80–90mm, Th.36mm |
2855 |
D-section, possibly same weight as RF 14114, Wt.144g, est.Wt.425g, est.D.100mm, Th.39 × H.48mm |
2856 |
Possibly same weight as RF 14113, Wt.120g, est.Wt.420g, Th.40 |
2857 |
D-section, Wt.65g, Th.37 × H.50mm |
2858 |
Large weight, tall D-section, Wt.142g |
SHEARS (FIG. 9.13; PLS 9.3–9.4)
Unless stated they all have slightly looped bows and blades of which the backs are straight before curving in to the tip.
2859 |
Complete. Blades have horizontal shoulders. L.188mm (FIG. 9.13; PL. 9.3) |
2860 |
Fragment of bow and stem only. There is a moulding at the junction of the bow and stem. L.28mm |
2861 |
Bent in centre, tip of one blade missing. Blades have sloping shoulders. Bow has pronounced internal nibs at the base. L.143mm (FIG. 9.13) |
286 |
Blade and stub of stem. L.75mm |
2863 |
Complete, but bent into an L-shape. L. (originally) 111mm |
2864 |
Complete. Blades have sloping shoulders. L.115mm |
2865 |
Complete. Blades have concave shoulders. L.144mm |
2866 |
Blade and stub of stem only. Blade has angle back and a rough groove cut into the top of one face. L.92mm (FIG. 9.13) |
2867 |
One half missing, bow bent over. Blade shoulder horizontal. Original L.c.205mm |
2868 |
Bent at 90° in centre, one blade incomplete. Bow has external ‘ears’ on each side. Blade shoulders sloping. L.(originally) 136mm |
2869 |
Blade and stub of stem. Random organic material on the blade and tang; possible traces of handle, with indication of extent, just on the blade. L.66mm |
2870 |
Blade and stub of stem only. L.77mm |
Complete. Bow has slight internal nibs at base. Blades have stepped shoulders. L.160mm (FIG. 9.13) |
|
2872 |
In two pieces. Blades have sloping shoulders. Random organic material present. L.197mm |
2873 |
Complete, but in two pieces and bent in the centre. Blade shoulders stepped. L.(originally) 126mm |
2874 |
In two pieces, one blade missing. Blade has sloping shoulder. L.100mm |
2875 |
Complete. Blades have sloping shoulders. L.144mm; blade L.44mm |
2876 |
Fragment of bow and stem. L.32mm |
2877 |
One blade incomplete. Blades have horizontal shoulders. L.191mm (FIG. 9.13) |
2878 |
Two blades with incomplete stems. Largest piece: L.181mm |
2879 |
Complete. Blades have concave shoulders. L.185mm (FIG. 9.13; PL. 9.4 |
2880 |
Blade and stub of tang. L.31mm |
2881 |
One arm missing. Surviving arm bent at 90° in centre, blade tip missing. L.(originally) 130mm |
2882 |
Bow and stems only. Bow has internal nibs. L.99mm |
2883 |
Complete, but in two pieces. Blades have sloping shoulders. L.128mm |
2884 |
Blade and stub of stem only. Concave shoulder. L.60mm |
2885 |
Complete, but one stem bent outwards below the bow. Blades have concave shoulders. L.146mm |
2886 |
One blade incomplete. Blades have stepped shoulders. L.124mm |
2887 |
Incomplete blade with stepped shoulder. L.55mm |
2888 |
One arm missing. Surviving blade incomplete and has sloping shoulder. L.105mm |
2889 |
Blade and stub of stem only. Shoulder concave. L.53mm |
2890 |
One arm missing. Surviving blade has concave shoulder. Stem has three grooves around it below the bow and two in the centre. L.115mm |
2891 |
Blade and stub of stem only. Concave shoulder. L.54mm |
2892 |
Blade and stub of stem only. L.81mm |
NEEDLES (FIG. 9.14)
Copper alloy (FIG. 9.14): (7 needles, plus 3 probable shank fragments)
2893 |
Needle |
2894 |
Needle |
2895 |
Needle |
2896 |
Needle |
2897 |
Needle |
2898 |
Needle |
2899 |
Needle |
In addition to the seven needles with extant eyes, two probable needle shanks were recovered from context 3758 (RFs 5450 and 6009) and a third was unstratified (RF 348).
BONE (FIG. 9.14) (6)
2900 |
Needle |
2901 |
Needle |
2902 |
Needle |
2903 |
Needle |
2904 |
Needle |
2905 |
Needle |
IRON (FIG. 9.14). (68)
The eyes are round and have been punched through an elongated countersinking unless stated. The shanks have a rounded cross-section and are c.2–3mm thick unless stated.
2906 |
Needle, fragment, shank only, angular section, part of a long eye visible at one end. L.34mm, D.2.0mm. |
2907 |
Needle, fragment, shank only, rounded rectangular section. L.28mm, D.1.7mm. |
2908 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and head, angular section, flattened head, circular eye 0.9mm set in groove 5mm. L.21mm, D.2.8mm. |
2909 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and head, rounded section, fine long eye set in long groove. L.19mm, D.2.1mm. |
2910 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and head, oval section, long rectangular eye 2.0 × 0.8mm, ?Y-eyed. L.16mm, D.1.9mm. |
2911 |
Needle, complete, rounded section, slightly flattened head, oval eye 1.4 × 1.0mm set in groove 4mm long. L.40mm, D.2.2mm. (FIG. 9.14) |
2912 |
Needle, incomplete, point missing, rounded section, flattened head, oval eye 1.5 × 0.8mm set in groove 7mm. L.37mm, D.2.2mm. |
2913 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and head, rounded square section flattened towards tip, long eye 3mm long. L.32mm, D. 3.0mm. |
2914 |
Needle, incomplete, head and shank, rounded section, flattened head, oval eye 1.6 × 1.2mm set in groove. L.31mm, D.2.5mm (FIG. 9.14). |
2915 |
Oval eye. Tip missing. L.36mm. (FIG. 9.14). |
2916 |
Needle, fragment, shank with end of eye, rounded section. L.33mm, D.1.8mm. |
2917 |
Needle, fragment, shank only, round section, flattened at head and end of groove for eye. L.22mm, D.2.7mm. |
2918 |
Head incomplete, shank bent. L.39mm |
2919 |
Needle, fragment, shank only, rounded section. L.30mm, D.2.3mm. |
2920 |
Needle, complete, rounded section, head only slightly flattened, oval eye 1.0 × 2.0mm in long groove. L.31mm, D.2.5mm. |
2921 |
Oval eye, shank incomplete. L.19mm |
2922 |
Needle, near-complete; tip missing. Rounded section, flattened at head, oval eye 1.8 × 1.0mm, groove both side. L.36mm, D.2.1mm (FIG. 9.14). |
2923 |
Needle, fragment, shank only, heavily corroded. L.13mm, D.2.2mm. |
2924 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and eye, rounded rectangular section, head not flattened, small round eye 0.8mm. L.16mm, D.1.4mm. |
2925. |
Needle, incomplete, shank and head, rounded section, head barely flattened, oval eye 1.2 × 0.8mm, ?Y-eyed. L.33mm, D.2.3mm. |
2926 |
Needle, complete, rounded section. L.25mm, |
2927 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and eye, near-round section, punched triangular eye 0.5mm wide in conical depression. L.18mm, D.1.6mm. |
2928 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and eye, rounded section, head slightly flattened, rectangular eye 1.5 × 0.8mm. L.41mm, D.3.0mm. |
2929 |
Needle, fragment, head and part of shank, flat rounded rectangular section, punched round eye. L.12mm, D.3.8mm. |
2930 |
Needle, fragment, head and shank, rounded section, flattened at head, long eye 0.6 × 0.3 set in groove (Y?). L.13mm, D.1.3mm. |
2931 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and head, rounded section, head slightly flattened, long eye 1.2 × 0.5 set in groove. L.16mm, D.1.8mm. |
2932 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and head, rounded section, head slightly flattened, oval eye 1.1 × 0.5mm set in groove (Y). L.27, D.1.8mm. |
2933 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and head, rounded section, flattened head, irregular oval eye 1.0 × 0.5 set in groove (Y). L.40mm, D.2.1mm. |
2934 |
Needle, complete, rounded section, head not flattened, circular eye 1.1mm diam. set in groove. L.47mm, D.3.4mm. |
2935 |
Shank curved. L.36mm |
2936 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and head, rounded section, head slightly flattened, long eye 2.0 × 0.6mm set in groove. L.29mm, D.1.9mm. |
2937 |
Needle, incomplete, head and shank, rounded section, head not flattened, long eye 1.0 long. L.21mm, D.2.1mm. |
2938 |
Head incomplete, tip missing. L.30mm |
2939 |
Head and shank incomplete. L.26mm |
2940 |
Head incomplete, point missing. |
2941 |
Oval eye, point missing. L.28mm |
2942 |
Point missing. L.65mm |
NEEDLE SHANKS (IRON) |
|
2943 |
Needle, fragment, point only, rounded rectangular section. L.25mm. |
2944 |
Needle fragment. L.47mm |
2945 |
Needle fragment. L.26mm |
2946 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and point, rounded section. L.28mm, D.1.9mm. |
2947 |
Needle fragment. L.26mm |
2948 |
Needle fragment. L.36mm |
2949 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and point, rounded rectangular section. L.38mm, D. 3.0mm. |
2950 |
Needle, fragment, shank only, rounded section, beginning to flare for head. L.25mm, D. 2.7mm. |
2951 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and point, angular section. L.23mm, D.2.8mm. |
2952 |
Needle, fragment, point only, circular section. L.11mm. |
2953 |
Needle, incomplete, head missing, angular section. L.41mm, D.3.6mm. |
2954 |
Needle, fragment, shank only, rounded section. L.20mm, D.2.0mm. |
2955 |
Needle fragment. L.25mm. |
2956 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and point, rounded square section. L.32mm, D.1.4mm. |
2957 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and point, rounded triangular section. L.27mm, D.2.2mm. |
2958 |
Needle, incomplete, point and part of head missing, round section. L.43mm, D.2.7mm. |
2959 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and point, rounded section. L.42mm, D.2.4mm. |
2960 |
Needle, fragment, shank only, rounded rectangular section. L.21mm, D.2.2mm. |
2961 |
Needle, fragment, shank only, rounded rectangular. L.23mm, D.2.1mm. |
2962 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and tip, triangular section, end of groove for eye. L.26mm, D.1.4mm. |
2963 |
Needle fragment |
2964 |
Needle fragment. L.39mm. |
2965 |
Needle fragment. L.31mm. |
2966 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and point, round section, tip ?chamfered. L.41mm, D.2.1mm. |
2967 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and point, rounded section, end of groove for eye. L.28mm, D.2.5mm. |
2968 |
Needle, fragment, shank only, broken lengthways, flattened towards one end. L.35mm. |
2969 |
Needle, fragment, point only, rounded section, very sharp. L.10mm. |
2970 |
Needle fragment. L.41mm. |
2971 |
Needle, incomplete, shank and point, rounded section. L.33mm, D.3.3mm. |
2972 |
Needle, fragment, shank only, rounded square section, flattened towards one end. L.31mm, D.3.5mm. |
2973 |
Needle, fragment, point only, rounded section. L.21mm. |
2974 |
Needle, fragment, shank and ?point, rounded section. L.25mm, D.1.3mm. |
Needle, fragment, shank only, rectangular section. L.20mm, D.2.5mm. |
|
2976 |
Needle, fragment, tapering shank only, rounded section. L.25mm, D.1.9mm. |
2977 |
Needle fragment. L.20mm. |
2978 |
Needle fragment. L.31mm. |
2979 |
Needle fragment. L.48mm. |
2980 |
Needle fragment. L.23mm. |
2981 |
Needle, fragment, shank and point, round section. L.25mm, D.1.4mm. |
2982 |
Needle, fragment, shank only, rounded section. L.15mm, D.2.1mm. |
2982a |
Needle, incomplete, shank and head, sub-square section, flattened head, circular eye 2.5mm, no groove. L.35mm, Th.8.0mm. |
RUBB ING STONES (FIG. 9.15) |
|
(Lithological identifications by Geoff Gaunt) |
|
2983 |
Rubber or burnisher. |
2984 |
?Slick stone. |
2985 |
Rubber or burnisher. |
2986 |
Rubber or burnisher. |
2987 |
?Slick stone. |
2988 |
Rubber or burnisher. |