NOTES

PREFACE

1.  Hyland, L.A. “Pat” (1993), Call Me Pat, The Donning Company.

CHAPTER 1

1.  Jaruzelski, B., K. Schwartz, and V. Staack (2015), Strategy& Global Innovation 1000 Study, http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/innovation1000.

2.  Schwartz, L., R. Miller, D. Plummer, and A. Fusfeld (2011), “Measuring the Effectiveness of R&D,” Research-Technology Management 54(5): 29–36.

3.  Ibid.

4.  Cohen, W., R. Nelson, and J. Walsh (2000). “Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not),” NBER Working Paper No. 7552.

5.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1523369/.

6.  Scherer, F.M., and D. Harhoff (2000), Technology Policy For a World of Skew-Distributed Outcomes, Research Policy 29, 559–566.

7.  An existing trademark prevented me from using IQ outside the academic domain.

8.  Lewis, M. (2004), Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game, W. W. Norton & Company.

9.  http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=0965147.

CHAPTER 2

1.  Shapiro, G. (2011), How Innovation Will Restore the American Dream, Beaufort Books.

2.  Schumpeter, J. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper & Row.

3.  Stevens and Burley (1997), “3,000 Raw Ideas = 1 Commercial Success!” Research-Technology Management, 40(3): 16–27.

4.  Kengatharan, M., “Freakonomics of Factors That Determine Failure of a Biotech Company,” http://qb3.org/sites/qb3.org/files/QB3Podcast20120521_6.pdf.

5.  Nelson, R. (1959), “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research,” The Journal of Political Economy, 67(3): 297–306.

6.  https://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/complaint-189.

7.  Zenger, T. (2016), Beyond Competitive Advantage, HBS Press.

8.  Zenger, T. (1994), “Explaining Organizational Diseconomies of Scale in R&D: The Allocation of Engineering Talent, Ideas, and Effort by Company Size,” Management Science, 40 (6): 708–729.

9.  Allen, T. (1977), Managing the Flow of Technology, MIT Press.

10.  Liu, C. (2016), “Brokerage by Design; Formal Structure, Geographic Locations, and Crosscutting Ties,” working paper.

11.  Nelson, R. (1959), “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research,” The Journal of Political Economy, 67(3): 297–306.

12.  https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvyindustry/about/brdis/.

13.  http://spectrum.mit.edu/spring-2014/the-brilliance-of-basic-research.

14.  https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/carotherspolymers.html.

15.  Cohen, W. (2010), “Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance,” in B. H. Hall and N. Rosenberg, eds., Handbook of Economics of Innovation, North Holland Elsevier.

16.  Posen, H. (2005), Three Essays on Innovation and the Impact of Capital Markets, http://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI3197730.

17.  Inc. staff (2003), “Brief Profiles of 2003 Inc. 500 Companies,” Inc. Magazine, Fall: 34.

18.  Klepper, S. (2002), “The Capabilities of New Firms and the Evolution of the US Automobile Industry,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 11 (4): 645–666.

19.  Bhaskarabhatla, A., and S. Klepper (2014), “Latent Submarket Dynamics and Industry Evolution: Lessons from the US Laser Industry,” Industrial and Corporate Change, http://icc.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/01/12/icc.dtt060.

20.  Smith, D., and R. Alexander (1999), Fumbling the Future: How Xerox Invented, Then Ignored, the First Personal Computer, iUniverse.

21.  Lerner, J. (1995), Xerox Technology Ventures: March 1995, Harvard Business Review Case #: 295127-PDF-ENG.

22.  Anand, B. (2007), Schibsted, Harvard Business Review Case #: 707474-PDF-ENG.

23.  Gompers, P. (2002), “Corporations and the Financing of Innovation: The Corporate Venturing Experience,” Economic Review, Q4:1–17.

CHAPTER 3

1.  Porter, M.E. (1980), Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York.

2.  Kim, W.C., and R. Mauborgne (2005), Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make Competition Irrelevant, Harvard Business Review Press.

3.  Porter, M.E. (1990), Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press, New York.

4.  Hou, K., and D.T. Robinson (2006), “Industry Concentration and Average Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance, 61(4): 1927–1956.

5.  Schumpeter, J. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper and Row.

6.  Adner, R., and D. Levinthal (2001), “Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation,” Management Science, 47(5): 611–628.

7.  http://www.virgin.com/AboutVirgin/WhatWeAreAbout as of November 1, 2016. The page has since been updated and no longer contains this quote.

8.  Bower, J. L., and C. M. Christensen (1995), “Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave,” Harvard Business Review, 73(1): 43–53.

9.  “The Columnists,” WSJ Magazine, July/August 2016, 18.

CHAPTER 4

1.  Smith, A. (1776), Wealth of Nations.

2.  Romer, P.A. (1990), “Endogenous Technological Change,” Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): S71–S102.

3.  Solow, R. (1957), “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3): 312–320.

4.  Thompson, P. (1996), “Technological Opportunity and the Growth of Knowledge: A Schumpeterian Approach to Measurement,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 6: 77; Lentz, R., and D. Mortensen (2008), “An Empirical Model of Growth Through Product Innovation,” Econometrica, 76(6): 1317–1373.

5.  Jones, C. (1995), “R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 103(4): 759–784.

6.  Gordon, R. (2016), The Rise and Fall of American Growth, Princeton University Press.

7.  Hartmann, Myers, and Rosenbloom (2006), “Planning your Company’s R&D Investment,” Research-Technology Management, March–April, 27.

CHAPTER 5

1.  Lauren Coleman-Lochner and Carol Hymowitz, “Lafley’s CEO Encore at P&G Puts Rock Star Legacy at Risk: Retail,” May 28, 2013.

2.  Mansfield, E. (1981), “Composition of R and D Expenditures: Relationship to Size of Firm, Concentration, and Innovative Output,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 63(4): 610615.

3.  Nelson, R.R. (1959), “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research,” Journal of Political Economy, 67, 297306.

4.  http://csdd.tufts.edu/files/uploads/Tufts_CSDD_briefing_on_RD_cost_study_-_Nov_18,_2014..pdf.

5.  Ibid.

6.  Stevens, G., and J. Burley (1997), “3,000 Raw Ideas = 1 Commercial Success!,” Research-Technology Management, 3: 16–27.

7.  Guler, I. (2003), “A Study of Decision Making, Capabilities and Performance in the Venture Capital Industry,” Dissertations available from ProQuest. Paper AAI3095885.

8.  Rosen, R. (1991), “Research and Development with Asymmetric Company Sizes,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 22(3): 411–429.

9.  http://web.stanford.edu/dept/SUL/sites/mac/parc.html.

10.  Schawlow and Townes (1958), “Infrared and Optimal Masers,” Physical Review.

11.  https://www.aps.org/programs/outreach/history/historicsites/maiman.cfm.

12.  Adner, R. (2012), The Wide Lens, portfolio.

13.  Maimann, T. (2000), The Laser Odyssey, Laser Press.

14.  http://moller.com.

15.  Wu, B., and A.M. Knott (2006), “Entrepreneurial Risk and Market Entry,” Management Science, 52(9): 1315–1330.

16.  Elfenbein, D., A.M. Knott, and R. Croson, “Equity Stakes and Exit: An Experimental Approach to Decomposing Exit Delay,” Strategic Management Journal, forthcoming.

17.  Lerner, J. (1995), “Xerox Technology Ventures: March 1995,” Harvard Business Review, Case Study 295127-PDF-ENG.

18.  Bhaskarabhatla, A., and D. Hegde (2014), “An Organizational Perspective on Patenting and Open Innovation,” Organization Science, 25(6): 1744–1763.

CHAPTER 6

1.  Chesbrough, H. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business Review Press.

2.  Arora, A., W. Cohen, and J. Walsh (2014), “The Acquisition and Commercialization of Invention in American Manufacturing: Incidence and Impact,” NBER working paper w20264.

3.  Hippel, Eric von (1986), “Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts,” Management Science: 791–805.

4.  Kuan, J., D. Snow, and S. Helper (2014), “Supplier Innovation Strategy: Transactional Hazards and Innovation in the Automotive Supply Chain,” working paper.

5.  Boudreau, K., and K. Lakhani (2013), “Using the Crowd as an Innovation Partner,” Harvard Business Review, 91(4): 61–69.

6.  Levina, Fayard, and Gkeredakis (2014), “Organizational Impacts of Crowd Sourcing: What Happens with ‘Not Invented Here’ Ideas,” working paper.

7.  Oshri, I., and J. Kotlarsky (2011), “Innovation in Outsourcing: A Study of Client Expectations and Commitment,” Warwick Business School working paper.

8.  Morris, F., and B. Shackelford (2014), “Extramural R&D Funding by U.S.-Located Businesses Nears $30 Billion in 2011,” National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, NSF 14-314.

9.  Weigelt, C. (2009), “The Impact of Outsourcing New Technologies on Integrative Capabilities and Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 30, 595–616.

10.  Azoulay, P. (2004), “Capturing Knowledge Within and Across Company Boundaries: Evidence from Clinical Development,” American Economic Review, 94(5): 1591–1612.

11.  Bikhchandani, S., D. Hirshleifer, and I. Welch (1992), “A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades,” Journal of Political Economy, 100(5): 992–1026.

12.  Pisano, G., and W. Shih (2012), Producing Prosperity: Why America Needs a Manufacturing Renaissance, Harvard Business Review Press.

CHAPTER 7

1.  Geisler, E. (2001), Creating Value with Science and Technology, Praeger.

2.  Knott, A. (1994), GM Hughes Electronics, unpublished teaching case.

3.  Ibid.

4.  Coleman-Lochner, L., and C. Hymovitz (2012), “P&G’s 1,000 PhDs Not Enough to Crank Up New Blockbusters,” Bloomberg, September 12, 2012.

5.  Ibid.

6.  Brown, B., and S. Anthony (2011), “How P&G Tripled Its Innovation Success Rate,” Harvard Business Review, 89(6): 64–72.

7.  Nickerson, J., and T. Zenger (2002), “Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice,” Organization Science 13(5), 547–566.

8.  Argyres, N., and B. Silverman (2004), “R&D, Organization Structure, and the Development of Corporate Technological Knowledge,” Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9): 929–958.

9.  Arora, A., S. Belenzon, and L. Rios (2014), “Make, Buy, Organize: The Interplay Between Research, External Knowledge, and Company Structure,” Strategic Management Journal, 35(3): 317–337.

10.  http://www.forbes.com/sites/chunkamui/2011/10/17/five-dangerous-lessons-to-learn-from-steve-jobs/#68556e3d60da.

CHAPTER 8

1.  http://blog.trade-radar.com/2009/07/how-to-analyze-tech-stocks-7-factors.html.

2.  http://www.forbes.com/sites/innovatorsdna/2016/05/18/how-we-rank-the-most-innovative-mid-cap-companies-2016/#365ddd49d7e3.

3.  Note that some companies in the Forbes 100 aren’t in the figure because they either don’t conduct R&D or aren’t traded on U.S. exchanges (the source of the RQ data).

4.  Damodaran, A. (2009), “Valuing Companies with Intangible Assets,” working paper.

5.  Financial Accounting Standards Board (1974), Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 2: Accounting for Research and Development Costs.

6.  As quoted in Hagerty, J. (2013), “50,000 Products but 3M Still Searching for Growth: CEO Thulin Sticks with Long-Term Research,” Wall Street Journal, November 18, 2013.

7.  It may seem paradoxical that tying CEO compensation to stock price would favor R&D given my argument that the market doesn’t know how to value R&D. However, the market ultimately values the R&D once it shows up in profits. CEOs with a long-term perspective expect to stay long enough to capture that gain.

8.  While these returns aren’t risk adjusted, the beta of the RQ50 is comparable to that of the S&P 500.

9.  Knott, A.M., and C. Vieregger (2016), “The Puzzle of Market Value from R&D,” http://ssrn.com/abstract=2382885.

10.  Cooper, M., A.M. Knott, and W. Yang (2016), “Measuring Innovation,” http://ssrn.com/abstract=2631655.

11.  Note this is a shorthand valuation that assumes costs are changing in proportion to revenues.

CHAPTER 9

1.  Jones, C. (1995), “R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, 103(4): 759–784.

2.  Jones, B. (2009), “The Burden of Knowledge and the Death of the Renaissance Man,” The Review of Economic Studies, 76 (1): 283–317.

3.  http://www.mapsofworld.com/world-top-ten/world-top-ten-personal-computers-users-map.html.

4.  http://www.nytimes.com/1984/11/23/business/typewriters-of-electronic-era.html.

5.  Chandler, A. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise, MIT Press.

6.  Jin, G., and P. Leslie (2005), “The Case in Support of Restaurant Hygiene Grade Cards,” Choices, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, 20(2).

7.  Cutler, D., R. Huckman, and M. Landrum (2004), “The Role of Information in Medical Markets: An Analysis of Publicly Reported Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 94(2): 342–346.

8.  Song, H., A. Tucker, K. Murrell, and D. Vinson (2015), “Public Relative Performance Feedback in Complex Service Systems: Improving Productivity Through the Adoption of Best Practices,” working paper.

9.  Taylor, F. (1911), The Principles of Scientific Management, Harper & Brothers.

10.  http://www.trimble.com/Corporate/About_History.aspx.

CHAPTER 10

1.  Hall, B., J. Mairesse, and P. Mohnen (2010), “Measuring the Returns to R&D,” Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, B. H. Hall and N. Rosenberg (eds.), North-Holland.

2.  Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson, and J.P. Walsh (2000), “Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Companies Patent (Or Not),” NBER Working Paper 7552.

3.  Abrams, D.S., U. Akcigit, and J. Popadak (2013), “Patent Value and Citations: Creative Destruction or Strategic Disruption?,” NBER Working Paper 19647.

4.  For a summary, see Redding, S. (2010), “Theories of Heterogeneous Firms and Trade,” NBER Working Paper 16562.

5.  If the R&D decision is made at the same time as those for other inputs, then all inputs should be jointly optimized. We make the simplifying assumption that because the benefits of R&D are lagged, it is chosen a year prior to the decisions for other inputs.

6.  Thompson, P. (1996), “Technological Opportunity and the Growth of Knowledge: A Schumpeterian Approach to Measurement,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 6(1), 77–97; Lentz, R., and D. Mortensen (2008), “An Empirical Model of Growth Through Product Innovation,” Econometrica, 76(6), 1317–1373.

7.  Knott, A.M., and C. Vieregger (2014), “An Empirical Test of Endogenous Company Growth,” SSRN working paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2382885.