Log In
Or create an account ->
Imperial Library
Home
About
News
Upload
Forum
Help
Login/SignUp
Index
Cover
Front Matter
Title Page
Publisher Information
Other Books in this Series
Preface
Contributors
The Moral Philosophy of Elizabeth Anscombe
David Albert Jones
1
2
3
4
Anselm Winfried Müller
1. A tale of two birds
2. Thought and behaviour
3. The immateriality of human thought
4. Thought and what it is of
5. Two rival conceptions of the human mind
6. Meaning, thought and truth
7. Cave language
8. Failure as disappointment
9. No distinction between grounds of failure
10. Falsehood versus failure
11. The teleology of assertion and judgment
12. Cave-assertions and cave-beliefs
13. The truthlessness of cats and cavemen
14. Assertion, truth, reality
15. Conscious normativity: truth and goodness
16. Morality as spirituality
17. Human dignity and its basis
Duncan Richter
1. The role of the moral ‘ought’
2. The role of the architectonic good
3. Is there an architectonic good?
4. So what?
José M. Torralba
1. The possibility of practical truth.
2. The necessity of practical truth.
Matthew B. O’Brien
1. Obligation as practical necessity
2. Obligation and practical inference
3. Obligation, authority and law
Thomas Pink
1. Obligation and its place in morality
2. Normativity - direction and appraisal
3. Obligation and appraisal
Candace Vogler
1. Scanlon’s concern
2. Scanlon’s encounter with Anscombe
3. Anscombe’s account
4. A glance at Michael Thompson in conclusion
Luke Gormally
1. Exposition of Anscombe on killing human beings
2. Killing and human dignity
3. Distinguishing what is intended from side effects
David Goodill OP
1. Anscombe’s three papers on war
2. Denyer’s criticism of Anscombe and the just war tradition
3. A moral distinction?
4. Deriving non-combatant and combatant from innocent and non-innocent
5. Intentionally killing the enemy
6. Conclusion
David Albert Jones
1. Anscombe on personhood
2. Anscombe on delayed hominization
3. Deductions from embryology and the significance of twinning
4. Anscombe ‘not that sort of “good Aristotelian”‘
5. When does the embryo become ‘visibly a human being’?
6. Anscombe on the moral status of the embryo
Kevin L. Flannery SJ
1. Defending Vermeersch
2. Agreeing with Anscombe, against Vermeersch
3. Anscombe’s solution
4. A criticism of Anscombe’s theory
5. Conclusion
Roger Teichmann
1
2
3
4
Mary Geach
Edward Harcourt
1
2
3
4
5
John Finnis
1
2
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
Back Matter
Also Available
← Prev
Back
Next →
← Prev
Back
Next →