David Wiraeus and James Creelman
Agile Strategy Management in the Digital AgeHow Dynamic Balanced Scorecards Transform Decision Making, Speed and Effectiveness
David Wiraeus
Stratecute Group, Gothenburg, Sweden
James Creelman
Creelman Strategy Alliance, London, UK
ISBN 978-3-319-76308-8e-ISBN 978-3-319-76309-5
Library of Congress Control Number: 2018945201
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG

The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland

I dedicate this book to my wife Vanja and our child Ella, as well as my sister Frida and parents Ulla and Anders, with all my love.

David Wiraeus

For my great nephews Kian Creelman and Ezra French and my great niece Arrabella French. Enjoy the long journey ahead.

James Creelman

Foreword

More than 25 years have passed since Bob Kaplan and I introduced the concept of the Balanced Scorecard through a Harvard Business Review article. This relayed the findings from a research project we led in 1990 with 12 large companies to find better ways to measure performance, rather than relying solely on financial measures. At that time, we were transitioning into the knowledge age, in which intangible assets were becoming more valuable than tangible ones, and where the increasing speed of change in markets meant that financial measures were no longer reliable predictors of future performance.

Financial results would remain, and continue to be, important, at least for commercial entities, but what were the non-financial drivers of those outcomes? This was the question we grappled with.

The answer proved simple and logical. Customers delivered financial results; the organization had to ensure its internal processes delivered value to the customer and that they possessed the required skills and capabilities to deliver those processes effectively and efficiently.

These observations were translated into the Balanced Scorecard framework, which comprised Financial , Customer , Internal Process , and Learning and Growth perspectives, each of which contained objectives (what we want to achieve), measures and targets (how we will monitor progress), and initiatives (how we will deliver to those targets).

A further question we wrestled with was why 90% of organizations failed to deliver to their strategy, even when it was well thought-out and logical. We found that the Balanced Scorecard could describe and operationalize strategies that previously were generally restricted to a very detailed strategic plan, which rarely left the boardroom shelf. Bob and I chronicled the successes of the original tranche of scorecard users in our first book, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action .

In our continued research, we found that some of the early Balanced Scorecard users, such as Mobil Oil’s North American Division, gained additional value when the strategic objectives were laid out separately to show the causal effect from the learning and growth perspective, through internal processes to customer and financial. Furthermore, although originally launched to overcome strategic performance management and measurement challenges in commercial organizations, government and not-for-profit entities, such as the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, soon adopted the framework. However, to meet their needs, such organizations reordered the perspectives, with stakeholder at the top (typically replacing the term customer) and financial lower down the Strategy Map.

These first Strategy Maps proved as valuable to users as the original Balanced Scorecard itself, as we explained in our second book, The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment and described fully in our third book, Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes.

The story did not end there. We continued to learn from the experiences of an ever-growing number of users. Our fourth book, Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies, documented the value organizations gained from cascading the Balanced Scorecard from the corporate level to business units and then to operating departments and support functions, as well as being the basis for strategically aligning external stakeholders.

Our final book. The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage, set out to offer a complete strategy management system through a six-stage model: defining the strategy, translating the strategy, aligning the organization, aligning operations, monitoring and learning, and testing and adapting.

However, even completing the fifth and final book does not mean the end of the story. On introducing the Balanced Scorecard framework and methodology, Bob Kaplan and I realized we were launching a revolution, not a static system. We knew it would continue to evolve to meet the strategic requirements of organizations in ever-changing and fast-moving markets.

Our work, and most notably the final book, serves as the inspiration for this book, Agile Strategy Management in the Digital Age How Dynamic Balanced Scorecards Transform Decision Making, Speed, and Effectiveness.

Just as Bob and I grappled with the challenges of transitioning from the industrial age to the knowledge age, Wiraeus and Creelman turn their attention to the challenges of moving into the digital age.

Changing roles from Balanced Scorecard historian to Balanced Scorecard futurist, the authors inventory the issues that must be integrated into the management systems of the future – They are to be commended for the audacity of their undertaking and for the reach of their results.

The revolution continues.

David P. Norton
Massachusetts
March, 2018
Acknowledgements

This book could not have been written without the advice, knowledge, and support of many people, whom we here acknowledge.

Bill Barberg (Insightformation), James Bass (Certified Scrum Professional), Bjarte Bogsnes (Statoil), James Coffey (Beyond Scorecard), Deepanjan Chakrabarty (previously Palladium), Marcello Coluccia (Imerys Graphite & Carbon), Jade Evans (Palladium), Liam Fahey (Leadership Inc.), Elena Gómez Domenech (Palladium) Mihai Ionescu (Strategys), Saliha Ismail (Ministry of Works, Municipality Affairs & Urban Planning, Bahrain), Brett Knowles (pm2Consulting), Stanley Labovitz (SurveyTelligence), Armen Mnatsakanyan (ConconFM), Sandy Richardson (Collaborative Strategy), Hubert Saint-Onge (Saint-Onge Alliance), Alistair Schneider ( startupsinnovati​on.​com ), Andreas de Vries (Oil & Gas Strategy Management Speuncialist expert), Iain Wicking (Oyonix Group).

We also extend our gratitude to Dr. David Norton for providing the Foreword to this book and to all our ex-colleagues in Palladium, who shared their knowledge and experience with us over many years.

Thanks also to Palgrave Macmillan’s Stephen Partridge and Gabriel Everington for their continued support and guidance.

Finally, James would like to thank Matt Sabbath Stark, Hugh Sturrock, Hugh Macleod, and Anto Brownes for their many nights in the Earl of Derby, Kilburn, London, patiently listening to his constant talking about the writing of the book.

Contents

Index273

List of Figures

Fig. 1.1 First generation Balanced Scorecard2
 
Fig. 1.2 A Strategy Map. (Source: Palladium)3
 
Fig. 1.3 The Execution Premium Process4
 
Fig. 1.4 Agile and adaptive strategy execution model5
 
Fig. 1.5 Age 2 Strategy Management System20
 
Fig. 2.1 Stage 1: How to formulate strategies for the digital age24
 
Fig. 2.2 Mapping the customer journey38
 
Fig. 3.1 Stage 1: How to formulate strategies for the digital age46
 
Fig. 3.2 A PESTEL analysis50
 
Fig. 3.3 Porter’s Five Forces framework50
 
Fig. 3.4 A SWOT analysis template51
 
Fig. 3.5 Strategsys SWOT analysis. (Source: Strategsys)52
 
Fig. 3.6 Strategic Change Agenda60
 
Fig. 3.7 FBI Strategic Change Agenda61
 
Fig. 3.8 FBI strategy map62
 
Fig. 3.9 Strategic Change Agenda, arranged from four perspectives63
 
Fig. 4.1 Stage 2: How to build an “agile,” and “adaptive,” Balanced Scorecard System72
 
Fig. 4.2 Strategic themes within the internal process perspective76
 
Fig. 4.3 Example of strategic themes within customer and internal process perspectives. (Source: Palladium)76
 
Fig. 4.4 A.W. Rostamani strategic pillars77
 
Fig. 4.5 Mobil oil linkage model for 199481
 
Fig. 4.6 Intellectual capital model82
 
Fig. 4.7 The risk Bow-Tie86
 
Fig. 5.1 Stage 2: How to build an “agile,” and “adaptive,” Balanced Scorecard System90
 
Fig. 5.2 Three sub-processes of hospital example strategic objective94
 
Fig. 5.3 Initiative scoring model108
 
Fig. 6.1 Stage 3. Driving rapid enterprise alignment114
 
Fig. 7.1 Stage 4: getting results through agile and adaptive strategy execution130
 
Fig. 7.2 Statoil’s alternative to the budget132
 
Fig. 7.3 Statoil’s menu for managing costs133
 
Fig. 7.4 Using rolling forecasts alongside Balanced Scorecard targets and initiatives. (Source: Palladium)137
 
Fig. 7.5 Driver models provide the analytical framework to focus on key leverage points and to link operational KPIs and action plans to strategic priorities137
 
Fig. 7.6 Decomposing an internal process objective into operational drivers and KPIs145
 
Fig. 7.7 Patient access operational dashboard146
 
Fig. 8.1 Stage 4: getting results through agile and adaptive strategy execution152
 
Fig. 8.2 Execution: the “seventh” stage of the execution premium process152
 
Fig. 8.3 The roles of the three offices within a transformation office. (Source: ShiftIn)159
 
Fig. 8.4 Initiative realization time-lag. (Source: Synergys)161
 
Fig. 9.1 Stage 9. Unleashing the power of analytics for strategic learning and adapting168
 
Fig. 9.2 The 4Vs of big data170
 
Fig. 9.3 Gartner analytic ascendancy model. (Source: Gartner)171
 
Fig. 9.4 A Fishbone diagram177
 
Fig. 9.5 The five whys problem solving tool178
 
Fig. 10.1 Strategy-aligned leadership and culture192
 
Fig. 10.2 The Leadership for the Execution of Strategy Model. (Source: Palladium)194
 
Fig. 11.1 Strategy-aligned leadership and culture208
 
Fig. 11.2 A Strategy Map with a “build a high performance culture” objective214
 
Fig. 11.3 High-level Eggi schematic, showing alignment as the core focus. (Source: SurveyTelligence)221
 
Fig. 12.1 Create a strategt-aligned workforce for the 4th industrial revolution226
 
Fig. 12.2 The causal relationship between the four human capital pillars and ultimate financial or mission success237
 
Fig. 13.1 A Sustainability Strategy Map. (Source: pm2Consulting)246
 
Fig. 13.2 A Sustainability Strategy Map aligned to the 21 Sustainability Business Goals. (Source: pm2Consulting)247
 
Fig. 13.3 Thriving Weld County Strategy Map. (Source: Insightformation)251
 

List of Tables

Table 1.1 Self-assessment checklist21
 
Table 2.1 Self-assessment checklist43
 
Table 3.1 Self-assessment checklist66
 
Table 4.1 Self-assessment checklist88
 
Table 5.1 Self-assessment checklist111
 
Table 8.1 The difference between traditional and agile approaches to project management154
 
Table 8.2 Self-assessment checklist166
 
Table 9.1 Performance area breakdown for customers that provided an overall rating of 5179
 
Table 9.2 Performance area breakdown for customers that provided an overall rating of 3179
 
Table 9.3 Self-assessment checklist189
 
Table 10.1 Self-assessment checklist206
 
Table 12.1 Self-assessment checklist241
 
Table 13.1 Self-assessment checklist256