Chapter 1. Fitness and the Human Codebase: Reboot Your Operating System

You get up in the morning with the shades yanked down, after having collapsed under the covers at some indeterminate time past midnight (which followed several robotic hours of Facebook typing). Luckily, you’d set the coffee maker on a timer, so a quart of strong joe waits on the kitchen counter. Twelve ounces of that washes down a toasted bagel smeared with extra margarine and jelly, as you’re out the door on the way to a 45-minute car commute.

It’s just the beginning of a marathon bout of sitting.

Sound familiar? When you get to work it’s an elevator ride off to the cubicle, where you refill the to-go coffee mug with joe that already tastes old, and someone’s left an open box of donuts in convenient proximity. You write code until you’re cross-eyed, interspersed with two meetings where you sit on your behind listening to two marketing/admin guys who love to hear themselves pontificate.

At lunchtime, you take the elevator downstairs and walk half a block to Subway, where you buy a “healthy” tuna n’ cheese sub, which is almost the size of the baseball bat you used in Little League. Half of it is munched down before you get back to your cubicle and that C++ module you were supposed to finish by 5:30, which rolls around with an amazing sense of time squashed into a smaller space than you ever needed it to be.

A few times during the day, you join the crowd congregating in front of the vending machines (to which an entire work enclave has been devoted). The temptation to push a couple of buttons on this amazing invention and get something—chips (many varieties), a Pop-Tart, crackers and tuna salad (yup, they have those in vending machines)—is overwhelming. The lively sounds of conversation are interspersed with the ripping noise of little bags being opened.

image with no caption

The messages your body undoubtedly sends you, however, roughly translated as I feel like crap, probably indicate that you’re not really designed to live this way. In fact, a bunch of scientists, fitness experts, philosophers, economists, anthropologists, medical doctors, and overall outside-the-box thinkers have come up with the sensible hypothesis that we are designed for our ancestors’ way of living, which was very different from the latter narrative.

We were not born to be chair livers, eating factory fare and keeping sleep hours like a vampire (unless we’re in college, that is). Chapter 3, Chapter 4, Chapter 7, Chapter 8, and Chapter 9 will fill in just about all you need to know about eating right, kicking up your heels, and getting some rest. We need to find another design pattern.

I tend to agree with the meme, or paradigm, that has made its way about the Web and even among the scientific journals (call it “paleo,” ancestral health, the return to Eden, or whatever you want to) that we were born to move around in sunlight, eat real food, and sleep much more than our friends want us to (you know, the ones who are knocking on the door right now and trying to get you to go to that party).

As a geek, think of our situation this way. We’re all born with preinstalled software, our human codebase. The genome. You know, the curlicues of DNA in our chromosomes inside the nuclei of most cells: all that ATGC code that defines what we are biologically. It is kind of cool, almost mesmerizing, how Mother Nature seems to have her own software language. Perhaps we’ve subconsciously invented computer programs that have the look and feel of our own internal code.

It took hundreds of thousands of years to write this software. The evolutionary process is very slow, meaning we haven’t changed very much in thousands of years. We’re all separated by tiny changes in our genes, such as the fact that some people can’t digest lactose that well and others eat asparagus and sense a different smell in their pee (really).

Our ancestors, with basically our genome, ate dead meat (as in, scavenged), wild meat that they hunted, stuff that grew, tree nuts, whatever lake or sea foods they could grab, and gobs of raw honey produced by swarms of bees made docile by the smoky fires lit beneath their nests.

image with no caption

Some of the time, as the weather was changing crazily around them (sound familiar?), they couldn’t find any food, for days—for weeks.

Whatever, essentially, our earliest forebears could eat to remain alive, they did eat. It all had to be hunted and wild; they didn’t have bodegas or convenience stores back then. They had to move to the food (no pizza deliveries or fancy caterers), and often had to chase and subdue it, if not fend off other predators who sought to reclaim their carcasses. They were outside a good chunk of the time during daylight hours.

We’re so close to these ancient forebears biochemically that molecular biologists have hypothesized a link from each of us to an ultimate Mom, a primordial Eve (see the sidebar, The Ultimate Super Mom: Mitochondrial or African Eve).

Imagine that you’re standing next to your grandmother in a long line. She is standing next to her mother, and then your grandmother’s grandmother is the next Mom in line after that, and the string of people extends for “10,000 grandmothers,” as the author Brian Fagan puts it in his book Cro-Magnon: How the Ice Age Gave Birth to the First Modern Humans. The 10,000th grandmother might be the ultimate Mom that all humans are related to.

It’s safe to say that the hunter-gatherers and us moderns are pretty similar in our genetic programming.

“Shallow” genetic changes that can dig in their heels faster are taking place all the time, according to Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending’s book The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution. These are variations on our genome; see the sidebar Night of the Mampires: How Genes Can Affect the Way We Handle Food.

About 99 percent of our genetic history, however, has been spent interacting with our environment more like a Maasai tribeswoman, a Plains Indian, or a modern lady getting her butt kicked during an Outward Bound course, rather than the characters depicted in the TV show Men of a Certain Age.

This has something to do with those eighteenth- to nineteenth-century Plains Indians being the buffest bad-asses in the world during their time.3 They were hunters who acted like hunter-gatherers and killed, ate, made stuff out of, and revered the American bison.

image with no caption

Here’s another evolution-related example, partly from Chapter 4 on micronutrients. We can’t biosynthesize or make our own vitamin C or vitamin E, as plants can (although we can biosynthesize vitamin D, from the sun). We therefore evolved to get vital micronutrients like vitamins from those photosynthesizing plants, as well as farther up the food chain, from the animals that munched the veggies. It’s part of our design; we eat plants and animals because, in turn, we need the C and E vitamins to keep our internal machinery going.

To reach the plants and animals, guess what, we had to be moving around in a cyclical pattern of hunt-gather-rest, then do-it-again. We are bipedal people, ambulatory by nature. Whether or not at any moment we could have been ripped asunder and devoured by wild beasts or stomped to death by the underestimated prehistoric bison (you can’t really sugarcoat that Paleolithic life, pun intended), this scenario still represents the diet and locomotive patterns that our ancestors, and we ourselves, were and have evolved for.

Is it possible to live in a way that completely undermines your own software configuration? Are we corrupting our own code? Well, yeah, I guess that’s where I’m leading, based on the aforementioned hypothesis of our closeness in design to our ancient forebears. Scientists call it evolutionary discordance.

The anthropologist Jared Diamond fumed in a famous essay from more than 20 years ago that the move to agriculture 10,000 years ago was “the worst mistake in the history of the human race” (Discovery Magazine, May 1987) and “a catastrophe from which we have never recovered.”

Diamond emphasized the rigid class-based systems and “gross social and sexual inequalities, the disease and despotism” that agricultural systems have bred, but there were other physical and health-related downsides as well, which persist in a different nature all the way up to modern times.

See the sidebar A Tale of HOE: Protein and thus Height “Tanked” for what the effect of the agricultural transition was on height and health in general.

The oft-stated disclaimer is that all this hunter-gatherer talk is baloney: human longevity has never been greater than it is now, and even inside bustling, youth-oriented places like Manhattan, you can find many centenarians. In contrast, the lives of our Paleolithic ancestors were “nasty, brutish, and short,” maybe averaging a third or less the length of one of those centenarians’.

A big problem with that argument, as a number of essayists have pointed out, is the concept of using an “average lifespan” to describe the health of a population of people.

As Jeff Leach pointed out in an October 2010 letter titled “Paleo Longevity Redux” in Public Health Nutrition:

Along the same lines, the author of The Black Swan, Taleb Nassim, pointed out in an essay called “Why I Walk”:

Undoubtedly, some of those ancient lives were “nasty, brutish, and short,” and inherently violent, without antibiotics, modern medicine in general, and a local police department.

In a way, the claims about brief Paleolithic lives are a red herring: the few remaining modern hunter-gatherers tend to go through their lives with only rare occurrences of the contemporary “diseases of Western civilization.”

Jeff Leach concludes his essay:

Note the “mismatch between genes and the environment” point in the “Tale of Hoe” sidebar. Things are at least as bad now in modern society as they were during the dawn of the agricultural age (at least those early farmers spent a lot of time outside doing hard-scrabble chores in sunlit gardens).

The World Health Organization estimates that lifestyle-oriented diseases will cost the global economy $30 trillion over the next 20 years (that includes smoking and alcohol abuse, as well as chowing down sugary and salt-laden snack foods).10

What’s going on here—why do we have such a massive health crisis? Don’t our experts have an incredibly deep and nuanced knowledge about how health and the body function? We’ve sequenced the human genome. We’re even working on “nutrigenomics,” or specifically tailoring nutrition and supplements to a person’s genes.

I guess health isn’t exclusively about science, medical practices, or conventional public-health recommendations, or we’d be able to apply that knowledge about how to stay healthy with greater success than we do. Couldn’t we do a better job of embracing a new design pattern, one based on our own inherited operating systems?

In a 2005 article in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, the medical doctor Boyd Eaton and his colleagues pointed out how lame the diet many of us depend on—which is commonly lampooned as the Standard American Diet (SAD)—is:11

Although dairy products, cereals, refined sugars, refined vegetable oils, and alcohol make up 72.1% of the total daily energy consumed by all people in the United States, these types of foods would have contributed little or none of the energy in the typical preagricultural hominin diet.

In a word, ouch!

Boyd Eaton also pointed out in a recent speech that “50 percent of our ancestor’s diet was fruits and vegetables; now for Americans it’s 13 percent, which represents a huge [decline]” in antioxidant intake (see the sidebar in Chapter 4 on those all-important antioxidants). “The skin of the fruit contains most of the antioxidants, and the smaller wilder fruits contain more antioxidants,” given that you have to eat more fruit skin with the smaller, wilder varieties to fill up on fruit servings.

Eaton and his colleagues have hypothesized, along with other researchers, that the “diseases of civilization,” like cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and depression, could be caused by this evolutionary discordance in food intake.

In addition, some studies have pointed to the lack of physical exercise as more evidence that we are badly out of sync with our built-in codebase.

“Recent cultural changes have engineered physical activity out of the daily lives of humans,” pointed out Manu Chakravarthy and Frank W. Booth in the Journal of Applied Physiology in 2004:12

As a result of the introduction of habitual physical inactivity into the pattern of daily living, the risks of at least 35 chronic health conditions have increased...we will speculate that the feast-famine cycling and physical activity-rest cycling that were related to food procurement for [hunter-gatherers] selected genes for an oscillating enzymatic regulation of food-storage and usage.

Ironically, our own built-in “man-page” (the software instructions for the Unix operating system) carries the imprint of our earliest low-tech ancestors, and provides many clues for maintaining fitness.

Of course, most of us cannot dash out the back door and give the hunter-gatherer life the old college try.

Nor can I advocate that we all sprint out into the woods with scary face masks and beat drums, throw spears at shadows, and howl at the moon (although, now that I mention it, what a blast that would be). We can initiate a kind of mashup of modern and ancient life, though. Our preloaded software represents a useful template with which we can assess our own daily choices. We know what we’re designed for; we read this book!

We’ve discussed nutrition a bit up to now; the rest of the book launches into the savory subjects of food, fitness, and exercise in quite a bit of detail. The movement angle of fitness is obviously very important, but to what degree?

Will Ferrell leans back in the movie Wedding Crashers and memorably cries out, “Hey Ma—the meatloaf—we want it now—the meatloaf!” He crystallizes an evolving biological tribe we could call Homo barcalounger.

We’ve become a species of sitters, as eloquently put by a doctor in a recent online issue of the Brooklyn Eagle:13

We move from the chair in the car to the chair in front of the computer in the office; then we go home in the chair in the car to the chair in front of a copious dinner to the chair in front of the TV. The next day the cycle repeats itself. We sit too much.

Believe it or not, scientists have coined a term for this trend: chair living. It has been a part of cubicle life for us geeks since the early epochs of the digital age, but many of us, along with others of the deskbound variety, have since altered our workstations to combine standing with computer work (check out the stand-up workstation called the GeekDesk at www.geekdesk.com).

Chair living apparently takes sedentary living to a new level.

If you’re like me, you probably think of sitting as an activity that is as common as, well, standing, and that might be bad for you if you did it for 25 years in a row. It’s much worse than that, apparently.

As James Levine, an M.D. at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, wrote in a November 10, 2010, journal article, “a growing body of evidence suggests that chair-living is lethal... linked to cardiovascular disease, metabolic [problems], excess weight, and shorter life span.”14

You can read that article and weep, then, consequently, leap out of your chair. Levine goes on:

A very useful measure of how much we are moving throughout the day is the metabolic equivalent of task (MET), or just metabolic equivalent. It’s a simple way to quantify our energy output, and it starkly underlines the differences between sitting and real movement. The MET is designed to represent the amount of energy in the form of heat we’re generating, using a numeric multiple. For example, reclining in a chair is 1 MET; sleeping is 0.8.15

This scale moves all the way up through walking about a mile per hour on the flat (1.9), actively raking leaves (2.9), light biking or golf (5.0), to running 12-minute miles (8.5), to running faster than nine miles an hour (9.5).

We’re going to be returning to METs throughout this book, particularly in the tools and exercise chapters. For example, Chapter 2 discusses a nifty little gadget called the Fitbit that you can use to measure your average MET for a day.

The bottom line is that you want to push up your MET for the day, because it’s what we’re designed for. We seem to be evolved for a steady oscillation of physical activity throughout the day, along with short bursts of intense, almost scary effort (yeah, exercise can be hormesis!—see Chapter 11).

By now it should be obvious that we are built to eat Mother Nature’s food, such as wild (or wild-like) meat or fish, and multicolored plants that come from organic farms and leap from the pages of Mother Earth magazine. We’re supposed to boogie down, and we’re not designed for self-imposed muscular paralysis. You might even think that this chapter belabors these points, which would amount to a harangue if not for the fact that most of these negative trends are instantly reversible.

I won’t include much in this chapter about the specifics of fitness-oriented exercise and training, because so much of the book (see Chapter 2, Chapter 7, and Chapter 8) is crammed with various techniques for sprinting, resistance training, trekking (with or without weighted vests), and more for capturing all of your exercise data on a web page for various forms of analysis.

This chapter will conclude on an upward swing with the flip side of the “daily grind” we began with. It includes a couple of adjustments that bring it much closer to our installed software base—and our own pursuit of optimal fitness.

Try this: you wake up without an alarm sometime soon after sunrise, with plenty of time to spare to make it to work.

It was a good sleep; you went to bed just after nine o’clock after having a snack consisting of coconut milk blended with blueberries and a little whey powder. You’re already savvy about getting enough REM sleep, but now you aim to bump up your deep sleep, or restorative NREM. You might even check out the wave chart your Zeo produced.

The first thing you do is pour a cup of black tea or coffee and go outside to this pool of sunlight you’ve noticed out your window.

You bask and reflect in it for a minute, perhaps followed by a few Tai Chi moves, push-ups on the lawn, or pull-ups on the jungle gym across the street from your apartment. You sip a bit more coffee and return to your living space to get ready for the commute.

Technically speaking, as you gazed up into the sky and basked in that sun, the light rays touched your retinas and were transduced by the hypothalamus and pineal gland in your brain, which has now helped set your circadian rhythms for the day.

The sun you got wasn’t much, not like spending the morning on the beach in the British Virgin Islands (gotta do that someday...), but it had the effect of lightening your mood, clearing your head, and kick-starting the day. You’ve sent the message to your body and your brain, “It’s morning and I’m well rested and ready to go.” (See Chapter 9 for more info on the health importance of sleep and rest.)

Every other day you stop at an intervening fitness facility to lift a few weights or do a 300-yard swim interspersed with a handful of 25-yard sprints—nothing too much, but today you’re biking to the train station, where they’ve thoughtfully included a place to lock your rig.

The train ride into the center of the city (Boston, New York, San Francisco, Seattle, Portland, Vancouver, Montreal; Zurich, Frankfurt, Copenhagen, London, Sydney, Wellington, Tokyo, Osaka, Kyoto...) takes 35 minutes, and you stand for most of it, just because it feels better.

Are you getting the point here? You’re able to shoulder a pretty hard job and commute, while staying healthy, mindful, and reasonably content. The days seem to flow more, instead of banging together like an extended train wreck, with you occupying the middle passenger car. Who could argue with that? You even get the monthly $50 bonus they pay at work to the employees with the fewest sick days!

The intent of the last assemblage of paragraphs wasn’t to get all vainglorious and virtuous about healthy lifestyles—although it was fun to write—as much as to paint a narrative about surviving the Digital Age and emerging from your days mostly unscathed (maybe an occasional bruised ego, but it comes with the territory, right?). This chapter has introduced some basic fitness concepts that the rest of the book will cover in sometimes extensive detail:

Unlike many faddish weight-loss and fitness schemes, the changes just described do not involve any expensive program or club fees, or drastic dietary changes (like “zero carb or fat”), except for the optional purchase of a few fun and useful gadgets or tools when you have a little extra change. In the next chapter, we look at some of these tools and apps with which you can analyze and quantify your fitness progress.