Dirk Helbing

Next Civilization

Digital Democracy and Socio-Ecological Finance—How to Avoid Dystopia and Upgrade Society by Digital Means

2nd ed. 2021
Dirk Helbing
ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
ISBN 978-3-030-62329-6e-ISBN 978-3-030-62330-2
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2015, 2021
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG

The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland

I would like to dedicate this book to Dietmar Huber

for the incredible support he has given to me over so many years.

Prologue

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

The United States Declaration of Independence after Thomas Jefferson 1

Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.

Benjamin Franklin 2

Many people know me as the scientist who has worked, among other things, on traffic and pedestrian flows and crowd disasters. As some may still remember, I have also been the initiator and scientific coordinator of the FuturICT project.3 This project attracted serious interest of Google, NASA, the US government,4 Russia5 and China,6 for example.

FuturICT was a visionary project for the digital age that was in the pole position for Europe’s one billion dollar flagship funding.7 You will find more information about it in the Epilogue. In short: hundreds of scientists were ready to bring a new paradigm for the world on the way. But, then, to everyone’s—including our competitors’—surprise, another flagship candidate was chosen.8 With the 1 billion Euro Human Brain Project,9 Europe wanted to build a realistic brain in silico, and Barack Obama announced a multi-billion dollar Brain Initiative.10 With this, the transhumanist era was launched.11 In the course of this book, we will understand the worrying implications of this.

In principle, it is a normal thing that one project wins and another one loses, and people move on. However, here, things were pretty different for various reasons. Whatever part of the project I wanted to follow up on—Nervousnet,12 for example—was seriously obstructed. This applied also to our work on “Digital Democracy”,13 which was repeatedly not even accessible on the Internet. Furthermore, I was permanently put under pressure for years, and so I wondered what was going on…

My discoveries were highly concerning.14 In the meantime, a digital mirror world15 has become reality16—but without privacy, ethics, participation and democracy, it seems. Instead of a visionary, almost utopian project, it appears that dystopia is on its way, as I will show in the course of this book (besides the great potentials of the digital revolution, too).

I have been warning the world about the dangers of dual use17 of digital technologies since 2011.18 After the FuturICT flagship was turned down, I got concerned and started to alert the public.19 In the years since 2013, hundreds of newspaper articles appeared (these can be found with Google News). I have given several hundred talks, which were uploaded to the FuturICT youtube channel20 (but not all of them are publicly accessible). I have also published dozens of blogs (see http://​futurict.​blogspot.​com), many of which appeared in two books entitled “Thinking Ahead”21 and “Towards Digital Enlightenment”.22

Furthermore, I have worked on the self-published book “The Automation of Society Is Next: How to Survive the Digital Revolution”,23 which is written for a scientifically interested readership that is open to philosophical, ethical and programmatic considerations. The 10 chapters from 2015 (Chaps. 1–5 and 7–11) have become the core of this book with the title Next Civilization, but I have added 4 new chapters that were written in 2019 (Chap. 14) and 2020 (Chaps. 6, 12 and 13). For the sake of historical authenticity, I left the previous chapters largely unchanged.

From today’s perspective, it is hard to imagine that the 2015 version of the book was highly controversial. At that time, a global digital control system was in the making. My alternative vision of the future, based on distributed organization, coordination, self-organization, and self-governance, fundamentally questioned the data-driven paradigm controlled by a powerful Artificial Intelligence (AI).

At that time, many were looking forward to the “singularity”, after which we would see a superintelligent system or “digital God,”24 which may be allowed to reign the world like a “benevolent dictator”,25 based on mass surveillance data. It could also be tasked to make the world sustainable. Unfortunately, the Artificial Intelligence system may figure out that a “depopulation strategy” might “fix the problem”. Later on, you will learn that this terrible scenario is not just theoretical, but a real possibility and serious threat.

I have, therefore, started to work on concepts that could make the world more sustainable in a democratic way: “digital democracy,” “City Olympics,” “democratic capitalism,” and a “socio-ecological finance system” (“FIN4”) to boost a circular economy26—to mention just a few of the ideas featured in Chaps. 713. In other words, there are surely alternatives to a dystopian future, but we would have to bring them on the way.

It turns out, however, that this is more difficult than expected, because many stakeholders seem to have different plans in mind, such as China, for example, or the big tech companies of “surveillance capitalism”. These often appear to be more interested in maximizing power or profit than in “saving the world”. And even those who claim that they want to save the world (such as CERN,27 the United Nations,28 and the World Economic Forum29) seem to pursue a centralized approach based on mass surveillance, with little transparency and no democratic participation.

In the end, one of the people who probably know more about this made a worrying statement in front of the United Nations’ General Assembly 2019:

“Can we still have confidence in politics, in business, in international organizations? These are questions to which we must find answers at our General Assembly”.30

In fact, the past years have been a tough time characterized by a global struggle for the path into the future. The following events give just a glimpse of what has happened in these years.31

On September 25, 2015, for example, a Snowden revelation was published about the “Karma Police” program run by British secret service GCHQ, which judges (the value of) everyone’s life based on mass surveillance.32 On the same day, Pope Francis promoted the Sustainability Development Goals (Agenda 2030) at the United Nation’s general assembly.33 I mention this here, because—believe it or not—I sent him a preprint of “The Automation of Society Is Next: How to Survive the Digital Revolution” before (it was my only mail to a pope ever). Just ahead of his speech, on September 24, 2015, and on September 11, 2015, Saudi Arabia suffered from a twin disaster. It was the biggest tragedy in the history of the Muslim pilgrimage34 and felt like part of the apocalypse.

As a follow-up to the UN general assembly, from November 30 to December 16, 2015, the Paris Agreement was worked out, which tried to bring a binding global contract to fight climate change on the way.35 However, before the US Congress signed the agreement, Donald Trump was elected US president, who later quit the international climate deal.36

Shortly before the Paris Agreement, I published the Digital Manifesto (“Digital Democracy Rather than Data Dictatorship”)37 together with an interdisciplinary team of scientists. The German online version appeared on November 12, 2015, but one day later, the world got distracted by the shocking terror attacks in Paris38 ahead of the climate summit. The publication of the English translation was ready to be published in Scientific American the week after. However, it got delayed for more than a year (in fact, until the end of the Obama administration).

Already before Obama left his office, it seems that China was trying to take over the role of the world’s leading superpower. At the G20 summit in Hangzhou in September 2016, Obama was denied the usual red carpet treatment.39 Before this happened, on April 30, 2016, Obama had warned the world40:

“… this is also a time around the world when some of the fundamental ideals of liberal democracies are under attack, and when notions of objectivity, and of a free press, and of facts, and of evidence are trying to be undermined. Or, in some cases, ignored entirely.

And in such a climate, it’s not enough just to give people a megaphone. And that’s why your power and your responsibility to dig and to question and to counter distortions and untruths is more important than ever”.

This hinted at the upcoming post truth era,41 which apparently took over after the control of the Internet was given to ICANN at the end of September 2016.42 It seems this cleared the way for a highly personalized Internet (using surveillance data about all of us). The development was complemented by two laws allowing for (counter-)propaganda.43 I believe, we have been in a kind of information war44 ever since. After the Cambridge Analytica scandal,45 we know how much this development has challenged democracies all over the world.

You are certainly aware that the struggle for the future of this planet has further intensified since the world started suffering from COVID-19.46 So, if you want to understand what might come next and what are the alternatives, it is about time to read this book, because these developments will likely affect your life much more than you ever have imagined.

August, 202047

Zürich, Switzerland
Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the FuturICT community for the many inspiring discussions and also everyone, who had to be patient with me in the last couple of years, including my parents.

I am also very grateful to Philip Ball, Stefano Bennati, Anna Carbone, Andreas Diekmann, Jeroen van den Hoven, Dietmar Huber, Eoin Jones, Caleb Koch, Richard Mann, Heinrich Nax, Paul Ormerod, Evangelos Pournaras, Kay-Ti Tan, and others for their valuable feedback on the manuscript and the many improvements (but don’t hold them responsible for any contents of this book). Jan Fasnacht, Petr Neugebauer, Petra Parikova, and Felix Schulz have been a great help with figures, formatting, references, permissions, and cover designs.

Furthermore, I would like to thank the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin—Institute for Advanced Study for the creative atmosphere and excellent opportunity to do research and prepare this book.48

Contents